Book contents
- Truth and Reference in the Making of Fiction
- Cambridge Studies in Philosophy
- Truth and Reference in the Making of Fiction
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Truth in Fiction
- Chapter 2 On the Mood for Fiction
- Chapter 3 Fictional Worlds
- Chapter 4 Fictive Imaginings as Entertainings
- Chapter 5 Desires and Emotions in Response to Fiction
- Chapter 6 Fictional Narrators
- Chapter 7 Interpretation and Ontology
- Chapter 8 Learning from Fiction
- Chapter 9 Fictional Characters and Fictional Reference
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 December 2025
Book contents
- Truth and Reference in the Making of Fiction
- Cambridge Studies in Philosophy
- Truth and Reference in the Making of Fiction
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Truth in Fiction
- Chapter 2 On the Mood for Fiction
- Chapter 3 Fictional Worlds
- Chapter 4 Fictive Imaginings as Entertainings
- Chapter 5 Desires and Emotions in Response to Fiction
- Chapter 6 Fictional Narrators
- Chapter 7 Interpretation and Ontology
- Chapter 8 Learning from Fiction
- Chapter 9 Fictional Characters and Fictional Reference
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Truth and Reference in the Making of FictionA View on Fictionality, pp. 197 - 223Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2026
References
Abell, Catharine (2015): “Genre, Interpretation and Evaluation”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 115 (1), 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abell, Catharine (2020): Fiction: A Philosophical Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abraham, Anna (ed.) (2020): The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108580298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, William P. (2000): Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Álvarez, María (2017): “Reasons for Action: Justification, Motivation, Explanation”, in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/reasons-just-vs-expl/.Google Scholar
Alward, Peter (2007): “For the Ubiquity of Nonactual Fact-Telling Narrators”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (4), 401–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alward, Peter (2009): “Onstage Illocution”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 67 (3), 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alward, Peter (2010a): “Word-Sculpture, Speech Acts, and Fictionality”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68, 389–399.10.1111/j.1540-6245.2010.01433.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alward, Peter (2010b): “That’s the Fictional Truth, Ruth”, Acta Analytica 25, 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arcangeli, Margherita (2014): “Against Cognitivism about Supposition”, Philosophia 42, 607–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arcangeli, Margherita (2018): Supposition and the Imaginative Realm: A Philosophical Inquiry, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arcangeli, Margherita (2020): “The Two Faces of Mental Imagery”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101 (2), 304–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, David (1971): “Meaning and Communication”, Philosophical Review 80 (4), 427–447.10.2307/2183752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arpaly, Nomy, & Schroeder, Timothy (2014): In Praise of Desire, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aydede, Murat (2018): “A Contemporary Account of Sensory Pleasure”, in Shapiro, L. (ed.), Pleasure: A History, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 239–266.Google Scholar
Bach, Kent (1992): “Paving the Road to Reference”, Philosophical Studies 67, 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, Kent, & Harnish, Robert M. (1979): Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bach, Theodore (2022): “Same-Tracking Real Kinds in the Social Sciences”, Synthese 200, 118.10.1007/s11229-022-03521-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Badura, Christopher, & Berto, Francesco (2019): “Fiction, Impossible Worlds, and Belief Revision”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (1), 178–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, G. P., & Hacker, P. M. S. (1984): Frege: Logical Excavations, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Balcerak Jackson, Magdalena (2016): “On the Epistemic Value of Imagining, Supposing, and Conceiving”, in Kind, A. & Kung, P. (eds.), Knowledge Through Imagination, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, Brian (2021): “Speech Acts, Actions, and Events”, in Stalmaszczyk, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 335–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bareis, J. Alexander (2020): “The Implied Fictional Narrator”, Journal of Literary Theory 14 (1), 120–138.10.1515/jlt-2020-0007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beardsley, Monroe (1958): Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism, New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
Beardsley, Monroe (1970): The Possibility of Criticism, Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Beardsley, Monroe (1982): “Intentions and Interpretations: A Fallacy Revived”, in Wren, M. & Callen, D., From an Aesthetic Point of View, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 188–207.Google Scholar
Beebee, Helen (2018): “Philosophical Scepticism and the Aims of Philosophy”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 118 (1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, Karl Gustav, & Franzén, Nils (2022): “The Force of Fictional Discourse”, Synthese 200, article 474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berto, Francesco (2017): “Impossible Worlds and the Logic of Imagination”, Erkenntnis 82, 1277–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berto, Francesco (2018): “Aboutness in Imagination”, Philosophical Studies 175, 1871–1886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bird, Alexander, & Tobin, Emma (2024): “Natural Kinds”, in E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/natural-kinds/.Google Scholar
Blomkvist, Andrea (2023): “Aphantasia: In Search of a Theory”, Mind & Language 38, 866–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumberg, Kyle, & Hawthorne, John (2022): “Desire”, Philosophers’ Imprint 22, article 8.Google Scholar
Bonomi, Andrea (2008): “Fictional Contexts”, in Bouquet, P., Serafini, L., & Thomason, R. (eds.), Perspectives on Context, Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 213–248.Google Scholar
Bourget, David, & Chalmers, David (2023): “Philosophers on Philosophy: The 2020 PhilPapers Survey”, Philosophers’ Imprint 23, article 11.Google Scholar
Bowker, Mark (2021): “Truth in Fiction, Underdetermination, and the Experience of Actuality”, British Journal of Aesthetics 61 (4), 437–454.Google Scholar
Boyd, Brian (2017): “Does Austen Need Narrators? Does Anyone?”, New Literary History 48, 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Richard (2021): “Rethinking Natural Kinds, Reference and Truth: Towards More Correspondence with Reality, Not Less”, Synthese 198, S2863–S2903.10.1007/s11229-019-02138-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, David (2005): “Empty Names, Fictional Names, Mythical Names”, Noûs 39, 596–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, Stuart (2002): “Fictionalism about Fictional Characters”, Noûs 36, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, Stuart, & Everett, Antony (eds.) (2015): Fictional Objects, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735595.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, John (2013): Rationality Through Reasoning, Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118609088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Ray (2013): “Conversational Implicature, Communicative Intentions, and Content”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43, 720–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budd, Malcolm (2007): “Aesthetic Essence”, in Shusterman, R. & Tomlin, A. (eds.), The Value of Aesthetic Experience, London: Routledge, pp. 17–30.Google Scholar
Bueno, Otávio, & Cumpa, Javier (2021): “Resisting Easy Inferences”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 102 (3), 729–735.10.1111/phpr.12713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno, Otávio, & Zalta, Edward N. (2017): “Object Theory and Modal Meinongianism”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (4), 761–778.10.1080/00048402.2016.1260609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, Alex (1993): “Truth in Fiction: The Story Continued”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71, 24–35.10.1080/00048409312345022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camp, Elizabeth (2017): “Perspectives in Imaginative Engagement with Fiction”, Philosophical Perspectives 31, 73–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camp, Elizabeth (2018): “Insinuation, Common Ground, and the Conversational Record”, in Fogal, D., Harris, D., & Moss, M. (eds.), New Work in Speech Acts, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 40–66.Google Scholar
Cappelen, Herman (2017): “Why Philosophers Shouldn’t Do Semantics”, Review of Philosophy and Psychology 8, 743–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Noël (1995): “Critical Study: Mimesis as Make-Believe”, Philosophical Quarterly 45, 93–99.10.2307/2219853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Noël (1997): “Fiction, Nonfiction, and the Film of Presumptive Assertion”, in Allen, R. & Smith, M. (eds.), Film Theory and Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 173–202.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198159216.003.0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Noël (2000): “Photographic Traces and Documentary Films. Comments for Gregory Currie”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55, 303–306.10.1111/1540-6245.jaac58.3.0303aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Noël (2007): “Narrative Closure”, Philosophical Studies 135, 1–15.10.1007/s11098-007-9097-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Noël (2012): “Recent Approaches to Aesthetic Experience”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (2), 165–177.10.1111/j.1540-6245.2012.01509.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Noël (2016a): “Art Appreciation”, Journal of Aesthetic Education 50 (4), 1–14.10.5406/jaesteduc.50.4.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Noël (2016b): “Motion Picture Narration”, in Thomson-Jones, K. (ed.), Current Controversies in Philosophy of Film, London: Routledge, pp. 115–128.10.4324/9781315764887-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, Peter (2006): “Why Pretend?”, in Nichols, S. (ed.), The Architecture of the Imagination, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caryl, Christian (2015): “Saving Alan Turing from His Friends”, New York Review of Books 62, 2, 19–21.Google Scholar
Castañeda, H. N. (1971): “Intentions and the Structure of Intending”, Journal of Philosophy 681 (15), 453–466.10.2307/2024757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, John (2021): “The Diversity of Fiction and Copredication: An Accommodation Problem”, Erkenntnis 86, 1197–122310.1007/s10670-019-00150-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dan, Cavedon-Taylor (2022): “Aphantasia and Psychological Disorder: Current Connections, Defining the Imagery Deficit and Future Directions”, Frontiers in Psychology 13, 822989.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David (2002): “Does Conceivability Entail Possibility?”, in Gendler, T. & Hawthorne, J. (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 145–200.10.1093/oso/9780198250890.003.0004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Ruth (2004): “Can Desires Provide Reasons for Action?”, in Wallace, R. J., Pettit, P., Scheffler, S., & Smith, M. (eds.), Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 56–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chasid, Alon (2017): “Imaginative Content, Design-Assumptions and Immersion”, Review of Philosophy and Psychology 8, 259–272.10.1007/s13164-016-0315-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chasid, Alon (2020): “Imagining in Response to Fiction: Unpacking the Infrastructure”, Philosophical Explorations 23 (1), 31–48.10.1080/13869795.2019.1663249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chasid, Alon (2021): “Imaginative Immersion, Regulation, and Doxastic Mediation”, Synthese 199, 7083–7106.10.1007/s11229-021-03055-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro (1989): “Anaphora and Attitudes De Se”, in Bartsch, R., van Benthem, J., & van Emde Boas, P. (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expressions, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Choi, Jinhee (2001): “A Reply to Gregory Currie on Documentaries”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 59, 317–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, Jennifer (2008): “The Hidden Image: A Defense of Unconscious Imagining and Its Importance”, American Imago 65 (3), 379–404.10.1353/aim.0.0024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, Brandon (2014): “Ethics and Fictive Imagining”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72 (3), 317–327.10.1111/jaac.12091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbí, Josep E. (2020): “A Family Meal as Fiction”, Organon F 27 (1), 82–105.10.31577/orgf.2020.27104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Judith K. (2021): “Two Approaches to Natural Kinds”, Synthese 199, 12177–12198.10.1007/s11229-021-03328-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cray, Wesley C. (2019): “Some Ideas about the Metaphysics of Stories”, British Journal of Aesthetics 59 (2), 147–160.10.1093/aesthj/ayz002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, Angela (2016): “Fictional Indeterminacy, Imagined Seeing, and Cinematic Narration”, in Thomson-Jones, K. (ed.), Current Controversies in Philosophy of Film, London: Routledge, pp. 99–114.10.4324/9781315764887-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, Angela (2019): “Silly Questions and Arguments for the Implicit, Cinematic Narrator”, in Carroll, N., Di Summa, L. T., & Loht, S. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of the Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 97–117.10.1007/978-3-030-19601-1_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Gregory (1990): The Nature of Fiction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511897498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Gregory (1991): “Work and Text”, Mind 100, 325–340.10.1093/mind/C.399.325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Gregory (1995): “Unreliability Refigured: Narrative in Literature and Film”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (1), 19–29.Google Scholar
Currie, Gregory (1997): “The Paradox of Caring”, in Hjort, M. & Laver, S. (eds.), Emotion and the Arts, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 63–77.10.1093/oso/9780195111040.003.0005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Gregory (1999): “Visible Traces: Documentary and the Content of Photographs”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57, 285–297.10.1111/1540_6245.jaac57.3.0285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Gregory (2004a): “Interpreting the Unreliable”, in his Arts and Minds, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 134–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Gregory (2004b): “Interpreting and Pragmatics”, in his Arts and Minds, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 107–133.10.1093/0199256284.003.0007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Gregory (2004c): “Genre”, in his Arts and Minds, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 43–62.10.1093/0199256284.003.0004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Gregory (2010a): Narratives and Narrators, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199282609.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Gregory (2010b): “Bergman and the Film Image”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 34 (1), 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Gregory (2010c): “Actual Art, Possible Art, and Art’s Definition”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (3), 235–241.Google Scholar
Currie, Gregory (2010d): “Tragedy”, Analysis 70 (4), 632–638.10.1093/analys/anq076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Gregory (2014): “Standing in the Last Ditch: On the Communicative Intentions of Fiction Makers”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72 (4), 351–363.10.1111/jaac.12109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Gregory (2020): Imagining and Knowing, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199656615.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Gregory, & Ravenscroft, Ian (2002): Recreative Minds: Imagination in Philosophy and Psychology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198238089.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Alessandro, William (2016): “Explicitism about Truth in Fiction”, British Journal of Aesthetics 56 (1), 53–65.10.1093/aesthj/ayv031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Ambrosio, Justin, & Stoljar, Daniel (2021): “Vendler’s Puzzle about Imagination”, Synthese 199 (5–6), 12923–12944.10.1007/s11229-021-03360-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Ambrosio, Justin, & Stoljar, Daniel (2023): “Imagination, Fiction, and Perspectival Displacement”, Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Mind 3.Google Scholar
D’Arms, Justin, & Jacobson, Daniel (2000): “The Moralistic Fallacy: On the ‘Appropriateness’ of Emotions”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1), 65–90.10.2307/2653403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danto, Arthur (1981): The Transfiguration of the Commonplace: A Philosophy of Art, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, David (2007): Aesthetics and Literature, London: Continuum.10.5040/9781472545343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, David (2010): “Eluding Wilson’s ‘Elusive Narrators’”, Philosophical Studies 147, 387–394.10.1007/s11098-008-9292-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, David (2015): “Fictive Utterance and the Fictionality of Narratives and Works”, British Journal of Aesthetics 55, 39–55.10.1093/aesthj/ayu061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, David (2016): “Fictional Truth and Truth through Fiction”, in Carroll, N. & Gibson, J. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Literature, London: Routledge, pp. 372–381.Google Scholar
Davies, David (2020): “‘Categories of Art’ for Contextualists”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78 (1), 75–79.10.1111/jaac.12698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Wayne (1984): “The Two Senses of Desire”, Philosophical Studies 45 , 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Wayne (1999): “Communicating, Telling, and Informing”, Philosophical Inquiry 21 21–43.10.5840/philinquiry19992112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Wayne (2003): Meaning, Expression, and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Wayne (2005): Nondescriptive Meaning and Reference, Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0199261652.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deonna, Julien A., & Teroni, Fabrice (2012): The Emotions: A Philosophical Introduction, London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203721742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deonna, Julien A., & Teroni, Fabrice (2015): “Emotions as Attitudes”, Dialectica 69, 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRose, Keith (2002): “Assertion, Knowledge and Context”, Philosophical Review 111, 167–203.10.1215/00318108-111-2-167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, Harry (1985): “Fiction and Fabrication”, Philosophical Studies 47, 201–211.10.1007/BF00354147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devitt, Michael (1981): Designation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7312/devi90836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devitt, Michael (2008): “Resurrecting Biological Essentialism”, Philosophy of Science 75, 344–382.10.1086/593566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devitt, Michael (2021): “Defending Intrinsic Biological Essentialism”, Philosophy of Science 88, 67–82.10.1086/710029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Cora (1995): “Anything but Argument?”, in her The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 291–308.Google Scholar
Diffey, T. J. (1995): “What Can We Learn from Art?”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73, 204–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Summa-Knoop, Laura T. (2016): “It Is Like It Is Always Right Now: Richard Linklater’s Boyhood and the Fiction-Nonfiction Divide”, Film and Philosophy 20, 48–62.10.5840/filmphil2016205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Daisy (2022): “Novel Assertions: A Reply to Mahon”, British Journal of Aesthetics 62 (1), 115–124.10.1093/aesthj/ayab017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Peter, & Bortolussi, Marisa (2001): “Text Is Not Communication”, Discourse Processes 31 (1), 1–25.10.1207/S15326950dp3101_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doggett, Tyler, & Egan, Andy (2012): “How We Feel About Terrible, Non-Existent Mafiosi”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (2), 277–306.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00437.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorsch, Fabian (2012): The Unity of Imagining, Frankfurt: Ontos.10.1515/9783110325966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta (2021): “When Both Utterances and Appearances Are Deceptive: Deception in Multimodal Film Narrative”, in Macagno, F. & Capone, A. (eds.), Inquiries in Philosophical Pragmatics, Cham: Springer, pp. 205–252.10.1007/978-3-030-56696-8_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagle, Anthony (2007): “Telling Tales”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 107 (2), 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, Anne (2020): “Artifacts and Their Functions”, in Gaskell, I. & Carter, S. A. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of History and Material Culture, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 35–53.Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine (2015): “Speakers and Narrators”, in Birke, D. & Köppe, T. (eds.), Author and Narrator: Transdisciplinary Contributions to a Narratological Debate, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 153–85.Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine (2021): “In Search of the Narrator”, in Maier, E. & Stokke, A. (eds.), The Language of Fiction, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 157–185.10.1093/oso/9780198846376.003.0007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egré, Paul (2008): “Question-Embedding and Factivity”, Grazer Philosophische Studien 77 (1), 85–125.10.1163/18756735-90000845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ereshefsky, Marc (2022): “Species”, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/species/.Google Scholar
Elicker, Bradley (2020): “The Ontology of Graphically-Fixed Literature”, British Journal of Aesthetics 60, 13–26.Google Scholar
Everett, Anthony (2013): The Nonexistent, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674794.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, Anthony, & Schroeder, Timothy (2015): “Ideas for Stories”, in Brock, S. & Everett, A. (eds.), Fictional Objects, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 275–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evnine, Simon (2015): “‘But Is It Science Fiction?’: Science Fiction and a Theory of Genre”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 39, 1–28.10.1111/misp.12037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evnine, Simon (2016): Making Objects and Events: A Hylomorphic Theory of Artifacts, Actions, and Organisms, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198779674.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felappi, Giulia (2021): “Empty Names, Presupposition Failure, and Metalinguistic Negation”, Journal of Philosophy 118 (5), 270–287.10.5840/jphil2021118519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Kit (2017): “Truthmaker Semantics”, in Hale, B., Wright, C., & Miller, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, 2nd ed., Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 556–577.10.1002/9781118972090.ch22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folde, Christian (2015): “Grounding Interpretation”, British Journal of Aesthetics 55 (3), 361–374.Google Scholar
Forbes, Graeme (2018): “Content and Theme in Attitude Ascriptions”, in Grzankowski, A. & Montague, M. (eds.), Non-Propositional Intentionality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 114–133.Google Scholar
Franzén, Nils (2021): “Truth in Fiction: In Defence of the Reality Principle”, in Maier, E. & Stokke, A. (eds.), The Language of Fiction, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 88–106.10.1093/oso/9780198846376.003.0004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, Elizabeth (2012): “Stating and Insinuating”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 86, 61–94.10.1111/j.1467-8349.2012.00208.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedell, David (2021): “Creating Abstract Objects”, Philosophy Compass 16, e12783.10.1111/phc3.12783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, Stacie (2003): “How I Really Feel about JFK”, in Kieran, M. & Lopes, D. M. (eds.), Imagination, Philosophy and the Arts, London: Routledge, pp. 35–54.Google Scholar
Friend, Stacie (2006): “Narrating the Truth (More or Less)”, in Kieran, M. & Lopes, D. M. (eds.), Knowing Art: Essays in Aesthetics and Epistemology, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 35–49.10.1007/978-1-4020-5265-1_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, Stacie (2007a): “The Pleasures of Documentary Tragedy”, British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (2), 184–198.10.1093/aesthj/ayl055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, Stacie (2007b): “Narrating the Truth (More or Less)”, in Kieran, M. & Lopes, D. M. (eds.), Knowing Art: Essays in Aesthetics and Epistemology, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 35–49.10.1007/978-1-4020-5265-1_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, Stacie (2008): “Imagining Fact and Fiction”, in Stock, K. & Thomson-Jones, K. (eds.), New Waves in Aesthetics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 150–169.10.1057/9780230227453_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, Stacie (2010): “Getting Carried Away: Evaluating the Emotional Influence of Fiction Film”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 34 (1), 77–105.10.1111/j.1475-4975.2010.00196.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, Stacie (2011): “Fictive Utterance and Imagining”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society suppl. vol. 85, 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, Stacie (2012): “Fiction as a Genre”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 92, 179–208.10.1111/j.1467-9264.2012.00331.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, Stacie (2014): “Believing in Stories”, in Currie, G., Kieran, M., Meskin, A., & Robson, J. (eds.), Aesthetics and the Sciences of Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 227–247.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669639.003.0012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, Stacie (2017a): “The Real Foundations of Fictional Worlds”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (1), 29–42.10.1080/00048402.2016.1149736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, Stacie (2017b): “Elucidating the Truth in Criticism”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75, 387–399.10.1111/jaac.12397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, Stacie (2019): “Reference in Fiction”, Disputatio 11 (54), 179–206.10.2478/disp-2019-0016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, Stacie (2020a): “Categories of Literature”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78 (1), 70–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, Stacie (2020b): “Fiction and Emotion: The Puzzle of Divergent Norms”, British Journal of Aesthetics 60 (4), 403–418.10.1093/aesthj/ayaa010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, Stacie (2021): “Falsehoods in Film: Documentary vs Fiction”, Studies in Documentary Film 15 (2), 151–162.10.1080/17503280.2021.1923145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frigg, Roman, & Nguyen, James (2021): “Mirrors Without Warnings”, Synthese 198, 2427–2447.10.1007/s11229-019-02222-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funkhouser, Eric, & Spaulding, Shannon (2009): “Imagination and Other Scripts”, Philosophical Studies 143 (3), 291–314.10.1007/s11098-009-9348-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, Richard M. (1971): “The Fictive Use of Language”, Philosophy 46, 324–339.10.1017/S003181910001696XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2001): “Gricean Rational Reconstructions and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction”, Synthese 128, 93–13110.1023/A:1010301706013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2004): “Assertion and the Semantics of Force-Markers”, in Bianchi, C. (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 133–166.Google Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2007): “Fiction-Making as An Illocutionary Act”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65, 203–216.10.1111/j.1540-594X.2007.00250.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2010a): “Fictional Singular Imaginings”, in Jeshion, R. (ed.), New Essays on Singular Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 273–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2010b): “Fictional Entities, Theoretical Models and Figurative Truth”, in Frigg, R. & Hunter, M (eds.), Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 139–168.10.1007/978-90-481-3851-7_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2012): “Foundational Semantics, I & II”, Philosophy Compass 7 (6), 397–421.10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00484.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2013a): “Norms of Fiction-Making”, British Journal of Aesthetics 53 (3), 339–357.10.1093/aesthj/ayt021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2013b): “Explicit Performatives Revisited”, Journal of Pragmatics 49, 1–17.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.01.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2015a): “Contexts as Shared Commitments”, Frontiers in Psychology 6, article 1932.10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01932CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2015b): “Is Fictional Reference Rigid?”, Organon F 22, 145–168.Google Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2016): “To Tell What Happened as Invention: Literature and Philosophy on Learning from Fiction”, in Selleri, A. & Gaydon, P. (eds.), Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature: New Interdisciplinary Directions London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 123–147.10.1007/978-3-319-33147-8_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2018a): “The Mill-Frege Theory of Proper Names”, Mind 127 (508), 1107–1168.Google Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2018b): “Sneaky Assertions”, Philosophical Perspectives 32, 188–218.10.1111/phpe.12116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2019a): “Normative Fiction-Making and the World of the Fiction”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 77 (3), 267–279.10.1111/jaac.12660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2019b): “On the Nature of Fiction-Making: Austin or Grice?”, British Journal of Aesthetics, 59 (2), 203–210.10.1093/aesthj/ayy054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2019c): “Assertions in Fictions: An Indirect Speech Act Account”, Grazer Philosophische Studien 96 (3), 445–462.10.1163/18756735-09603013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2019d): “Singular Reference in Fictional Discourse?”, Disputatio 11 (54), 143–177.10.2478/disp-2019-0015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2019e): “Semantics of Fictional Terms”, Teorema 38 (2), 73–100.Google Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2020a): “Assertion and Fiction”, in Goldberg, S. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Assertion, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 437–457.Google Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2020b): “Referential Indeterminacy in Fiction”, Journal of Applied Logic 7 (2), 177–190.Google Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2020c): “Commentary on Greg Currie’s Imagining and Knowing”, The Junkyard, https://junkyardofthemind.com/blog/2020/6/13/book-symposium-garca-carpintero-commentary-and-response.Google Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2020d): “Co-Identification and Fictional Names”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101 (1), 3–34.10.1111/phpr.12552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2021a): “Metasemantics: A Normative Perspective (and the Case of Mood)”, Stalmaszczyk, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 401–418.10.1017/9781108698283.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2021b): “Documentaries and the Fiction/Nonfiction Divide”, Studies in Documentary Film 15 (2), 163–174.10.1080/17503280.2021.1923146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2021c): “Do the Imaginings that Fictions Invite Have a Direction of Fit?”, in Maier, E. & Stokke, A. (eds.), The Language of Fiction, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 131–152.10.1093/oso/9780198846376.003.0006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2021d): “Models as Hypostatizations”, in Cassini, A. & Redmond, J. (eds.), Models and Idealizations in Science: Fictional and Artifactual Approaches, Cham: Springer, pp. 179–197.10.1007/978-3-030-65802-1_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2021e): “Pretense, Cancellation, and the Act Theory of Propositions”, Inquiry, https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2021.1990795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2021f): “Reference-Fixing and Presuppositions”, in Biggs, S. & Geirsson, H. (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Reference, London: Routledge, pp. 179–198.Google Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2022a): “Predelli on Fictional Discourse”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 80 (1), 83–94.10.1093/jaac/kpab062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2022b): “How to Understand Rule-Constituted Kinds”, Review of Philosophy and Psychology 13, 7–27.10.1007/s13164-021-00576-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2022c): “Games, Artworks, and Hybrids”, in Terrone, E. & Tripodi, V. (eds.), Being and Value in Technology, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 187–217.10.1007/978-3-030-88793-3_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2023a): “Semantics of Fiction”, Mind & Language 38 (2), 604–618.10.1111/mila.12412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (2023b): “Lying vs. Misleading, with Language and Pictures: The Adverbial Account”, Linguistics and Philosophy 46 (3), 509–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (forthcoming-a): “Intention and Convention Revisited”, Analytic Philosophy.Google Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel (forthcoming-b): Tell Me What You Know, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gaskin, Richard (2013): Language, Truth, and Literature, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199657902.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaut, Berys (2003): “Creativity and Imagination”, in Gaut, B. & Livingston, P. (eds.), The Creation of Art: New Essays in Philosophical Aesthetics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 148–173.Google Scholar
Gaut, Berys (2006): “Art and Cognition”, in Kieran, M. (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 115–126.Google Scholar
Gaut, Berys (2010): A Philosophy of Cinematic Art, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511674716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaut, Berys (2015): “Elegy in LA: Blade Runner, Empathy and Death”, in Coplan, A. & Davies, D. (eds.), Blade Runner, London: Routledge, pp. 31–45.10.4324/9780203100592-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Susan A. (2003): The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195154061.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendler, Tamar Szabó (2000): “The Puzzle of Imaginative Resistance”, Journal of Philosophy 97 (2), 55–81.10.2307/2678446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendler, Tamar Szabó (2006): “Imaginative Resistance Revisited”, in Nichols, S. (ed.), The Architecture of the Imagination, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 149–173.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199275731.003.0009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendler, Tamar Szabó, & Kovakovich, Karson (2006): “Genuine Rational Fictional Emotions”, in Kieran, M. (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art, New York: Blackwell, pp. 241–253.Google Scholar
Gerrans, Philip, & Mulligan, Kevin (2018): “Intentional Imagination and Delusion”, in Saint-Germier, P. (ed.), Language, Evolution and Mind: Essays in Honour of Anne Reboul, Rickmansworth: College Publications, pp. 279–310.Google Scholar
Gerrig, Richard J., & Horton, William (2001): “Of Texts and Toggles: Categorical Versus Continuous Views of Communication”, Discourse Processes 32 (1), 81–87.10.1207/S15326950DP3201_05CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, Jonathan (2020): Apt Imaginings: Feelings for Fictions and Other Creatures of the Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190096342.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasgow, Joshua, & Woodward, Jonathan M. (2015): “Basic Racial Realism”, Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1 (3), 449–466.10.1017/apa.2015.7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasgow, Joshua, Haslanger, Sally, Jeffers, Chike, & Spencer, Quayshawn (2019): What Is Race? Four Philosophical Views, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190610173.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glavaničová, Daniela (2021): “Rethinking Role Realism”, British Journal of Aesthetics 61 (1), 59–74.10.1093/aesthj/ayaa034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffin, Kris (2019): “The Affective Experience of Aesthetic Properties”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 100, 283–300.10.1111/papq.12245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godman, Marion, Mallozzi, Antonella, & Papineau, David (2020): “Essential Properties Are Super-Explanatory: Taming Metaphysical Modality”, Journal of the American Philosophical Association 6, 316–334.10.1017/apa.2019.48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez-Torrente, Mario (2019): Roads to Reference: An Essay on Reference-fixing in Natural Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198846277.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Jeffrey (2010): “Fictionalia as Modal Artifacts”, Grazer Philosophische Studien 80, 21–46.10.1163/18756735-90000869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Nelson (1976): Languages of Art, Indianapolis: Hackett.10.5040/9781350928541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Rachel (2018): “Do Acquaintance Theorists Have an Attitude Problem?”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96, 67–86.10.1080/00048402.2017.1302488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorodeisky, Keren (2021a): “On Liking Aesthetic Value”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 102 (2), 261–280.10.1111/phpr.12641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorodeisky, Keren (2021b): “The Authority of Pleasure”, Noûs 55, 199–220.10.1111/nous.12310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorodeisky, Keren, & Marcus, Eric (2018): “Aesthetic Rationality”, Journal of Philosophy 115 (3), 113–140.10.5840/jphil201811538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Peter J. (2010): “Testimonial Entitlement and the Function of Comprehension”, in Millar, A., Haddock, A., & Pritchard, D. (eds.), Social Epistemology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 148–174.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577477.003.0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Robert (2001): “Fiction, Meaning, and Utterance”, Inquiry 44, 389–404.10.1080/002017401753263225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Lyndal, & Phillips-Brown, Milo (2020): “Getting What You Want”, Philosophical Studies 177, 1791–1810.10.1007/s11098-019-01285-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Mitchell (2017a): “Narrative Fiction as a Source of Knowledge”, in Olmos, P. (ed.), Narration as Argument, Cham: Springer, pp. 47–61.10.1007/978-3-319-56883-6_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Alex (2021): Desire as Belief: A Study of Desire, Motivation, and Rationality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198848172.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Dominic (2016): “Imagination and Mental Imagery”, in Kind, A. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of the Imagination, London: Routledge, pp. 97–110.Google Scholar
Green, Mitchell (2017b): “Assertion”, Oxford Handbooks Online, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935314.013.8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1957): “Meaning”, Philosophical Review 66 (3), 377–388.10.2307/2182440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975): “Logic and Conversation”, in Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in Grice (1989), pp. 22–40, from which I quote.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1989): Studies in The Ways of Words, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Griffith, Aaron (2020): “Realizing Race”, Philosophical Studies 177, 1919–1934.10.1007/s11098-019-01291-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, Richard (2004): “As Good as It Gets: Lewis on Truth in Fiction”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82, 112–128.10.1080/713659790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannon, Michael (2021): “Recent Work in the Epistemology of Understanding”, American Philosophical Quarterly 58 (3), 269–290.10.2307/48616060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannon, Michael, & Nguyen, James (2022): “Understanding Philosophy”, Inquiry, https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2146186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardimon, Michael O. (2003): “The Ordinary Conception of Race”, Journal of Philosophy 100 (9), 437–455.10.5840/jphil2003100932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Daniel W. (2022): “Imperative Inference and Practical Rationality”, Philosophical Studies 179, 1065–1090.10.1007/s11098-021-01687-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haukioja, Jussi, Nyquist, Mons, & Jylkkä, Jussi (2021): “Reports from Twin Earth: Both Deep Structure and Appearance Determine the Reference of Natural Kind Terms”, Mind & Language 36, 377–403.10.1111/mila.12278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawthorne, John, Rothschild, Daniel, & Spectre, Levi (2016): “Belief Is Weak”, Philosophical Studies 173 (5), 1393–1404.10.1007/s11098-015-0553-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine, & Gessler, Nicholas (2004): “The Slipstream of Mixed Reality: Unstable Ontologies and Semiotic Markers in The Thirteenth Floor, Dark City, and Mulholland Drive”, Proceedings of the Modern Language Association 119 (3), 482–499.10.1632/003081204X20541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazlett, Allan (2022): “Desires as Goodness”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 105, 160–18010.1111/phpr.12812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyd, Theresa (2006): “Understanding and Handling Unreliable Narratives: A Pragmatic Model and Method”, Semiotica 162, 217–243.Google Scholar
Hicks, Michael (2015): “Pretense and Fiction-Directed Thought”, Philosophical Studies 172, 1549–1573.10.1007/s11098-014-0364-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, Alison (2017): “Aesthetic Understanding”, in Grimm (ed.), S., Making Sense of the World: New Essays on the Philosophy of Understanding, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 160–176.Google Scholar
Hinchman, Edward (2020): “Assertion and Testimony”, in Goldberg, S. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Assertion, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 555–580.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Sarah (2004): “Fiction as Action”, Philosophia 31, 513–529.10.1007/BF02385199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holguín, Ben (2022): “Thinking, Guessing, and Believing” Philosophers’ Imprint 22, article 6.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Robert (2008): “What Do We See in Film?”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66, 149–159.10.1111/j.1540-6245.2008.00295.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Robert (2018): “How Imagination Gives Rise to Knowledge”, in Macpherson, F. & Dorsch, F. (eds.), Perceptual Memory and Perceptual Imagination, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 46–71.Google Scholar
Howard, Christopher (2023): “Fitting Attitude Theories of Value”, in Zalta, E. N. & Nodelman, U. (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/fitting-attitude-theories/.Google Scholar
Hudson, Jennifer (2004): “‘No Hay Banda, and Yet We Hear a Band’: David Lynch’s Reversal of Coherence in Mulholland Drive”, Journal of Film and Video 56, 17–24.Google Scholar
Hunt, Marcus William (2023): “Do Imaginings Have a Goal?”, Global Philosophy 33, article 11.10.1007/s10516-023-09658-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Daniel (1981): “Reference and Meinongian Objects”, Grazer Philosophische Studien 14, 23–36.Google Scholar
Ichikawa, Jonathan (2009): “Dreaming and Imagination”, Mind & Language 24 (1), 103–121.10.1111/j.1468-0017.2008.01355.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichikawa, Jonathan (2016): “Imagination, Dreaming, and Hallucination”, in Kind, A. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of the Imagination, London: Routledge, pp. 149–162.Google Scholar
Ichikawa, Jonathan, & Jarvis, Benjamin (2009): “Thought-Experiment Intuitions and Truth in Fiction”, Philosophical Studies 142, 221–246.10.1007/s11098-007-9184-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichikawa, Jonathan, & Jarvis, Benjamin (2013): The Rules of Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199661800.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichino, Anna (2024): “Imagination, Belief, and Regarding-as-True”, in Vendrell Ferran, Í. & Werner, C. (eds.), Imagination and Experience: Philosophical Explorations, London: Routledge, pp. 130–146.10.4324/9781003366898-10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichino, Anna, & Currie, Gregory (2017): “Truth and Trust in Fiction”, in Sullivan-Bissett, E., Bradley, H., & Noordhof, P. (eds.), Art and Belief, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 53–83.Google Scholar
Irvin, Sherri (2006): “Authors, Intentions and Literary Practices”, Philosophy Compass 1 (2), 114–128.10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00016.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, William (2015): “Authorial Declaration and Extreme Actual Intentionalism: Is Dumbledore Gay?”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 73 (2), 141–147.10.1111/jaac.12158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Michael & Burgos, Adam (2024): “Race”, in Zalta, E. N. & Nodelman, U. (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/race/.Google Scholar
Jerzak, Ethan (2019): “Two Ways to Want?”, Journal of Philosophy 116 (2), 65–98.10.5840/jphil201911624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kania, Andrew (2005): “Against the Ubiquity of Fictional Narrators”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63, 47–54.10.1111/j.0021-8529.2005.00180.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kania, Andrew (2007): “Against Them, Too: A Reply to Alward”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (4), 404–408.10.1111/j.1540-594X.2007.00274.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1952): The Critique of judgement, Trans. James Creed Meredith, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, David (1973): “Bob and Carol and Ted and Alice”, in K. J. J. Hintikka, , J. M. E. Moravcsik, & P. Suppes (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 490–518.10.1007/978-94-010-2506-5_27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, David (1978): “Dthat”, in Cole, P. (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9, New York: Academic Press, pp. 221–243.Google Scholar
Kaplan, David (1990): “Words”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society suppl. vol. 64, 93–119.10.1093/aristoteliansupp/64.1.93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri (1977): “Syntax and Semantics of Questions”, Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 1–44.10.1007/BF00351935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keil, Frank C. (1989): Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2065.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalidi, Muhammad Ali (2023): Natural Kinds, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009008655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalifa, Kareem, & Lauer, Richard (2021): “Do the Social Sciences Vindicate Race’s Reality?”, Philosophers’ Imprint 21, article 21.Google Scholar
Kim, Hannah H. (2022): “A New Class of Fictional Truths”, Philosophical Quarterly 72 (1), 90–107.10.1093/pq/pqab014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Hannah H. (2025): “Imagination and the Permissive View of Fictional Truth”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2025.2497043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kind, Amy (2001): “Putting the Image Back in Imagination”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (1), 85–110.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00042.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kind, Amy (2011): “The Puzzle of Imaginative Desire”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3), 421–439.10.1080/00048402.2010.503763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kind, Amy (2013): “The Heterogeneity of the Imagination”, Erkenntnis 78, 141–159.10.1007/s10670-011-9313-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kind, Amy (2016a): “Introduction”, in Kind, A. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of the Imagination, London: Routledge, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Kind, Amy (2016b): “Imagining under Constraints”, in Kind, A. & Kung, P. (eds.), Knowledge Through Imagination, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 145–159.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716808.003.0007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kind, Amy (2016c): “Desire-like Imagination”, in Kind, A. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of the Imagination, London: Routledge, pp. 163–176.Google Scholar
Kind, Amy (2019): “Imagination Minimalized”, British Journal of Aesthetics 59 (2), 215–218.Google Scholar
Kind, Amy (2021): “Can Imagination Be Unconscious?”, Synthese 199, 13121–13141.10.1007/s11229-021-03369-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindt, Tom & Müller, Hans-Harald (2011): “Six Ways Not to Save the Implied Author”, Style 45 (1), 67–79.10.5325/style.45.1.0067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Alexandra (2012): “The Aesthetic Attitude”, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://iep.utm.edu/aesthetic-attitude/.Google Scholar
King, Jeffrey (2013): “Supplementives, the Coordination Account, and Conflicting Intentions”, Philosophical Perspectives 27, 288–311.10.1111/phpe.12028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kivy, Peter (2011): Once-Told Tales: An Essay in Literary Aesthetics, Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444397666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klauk, Tobias (2014): “Zalta on Encoding Fictional Properties”, Journal of Literary Theory 8 (2), 234–256.10.1515/jlt-2014-0012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klock, Geoff (2017): “‘Goodnight, Sweet Betty’: Levels of Illusion in Mulholland Drive and Hamlet”, Quarterly Review of Film and Video 34 (1), 50–65.10.1080/10509208.2016.1144038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Jonas (2011): “Unreliable and Discordant Film Narration”, Journal of Literary Theory 5 (1), 57–80.10.1515/jlt.2011.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köppe, Tilmann & Kindt, Tom (2011): “Unreliable Narrator with a Narrator and Without”, Journal of Literary Theory 5 (1), 81–94.10.1515/jlt.2011.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köppe, Tilmann, & Stühring, Jan (2011): “Against Pan-Narrator Theories”, Journal of Literary Theory Semantic 40, 59–80.10.1515/jlse.2011.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köppe, Tilmann, & Stühring, Jan (2015): “Against Pragmatic Arguments for Pan-Narrator Theories: The Case of Hawthorne’s ‘Rappaccini’s Daughter’”, in Birke, D. & Köppe, T. (eds.), Author and Narrator: Transdisciplinary Contributions to a Narratological Debate, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 13–43.10.1515/9783110348552.13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika (2023): “Situations in Natural Language Semantics”, in Zalta, E. N. & Nodelman, U. (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/situations-semantics/.Google Scholar
Kriegel, Uriah (2013): “Entertainings as a Propositional Attitude: A Nonreductive Characterization”, American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Kriegel, Uriah (2015): The Varieties of Consciousness, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199846122.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul (1977): “Speaker’s Reference and Semantic Reference”, in French, P., Uehling, T., & Wettstein, H (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 255–276.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul (1979): “A Puzzle about Belief”, in Margalit, A. (ed.), Meaning and Use, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 239–83.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul (2013): Reference and Existence, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Based on the John Locke Lectures originally delivered in 1973.)10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199928385.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroon, Fred, & Voltolini, Alberto (2018): “Fictional Entities”, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/fictional-entities/.Google Scholar
Kung, Peter (2010): “Imagining as a Guide to Possibility”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (3), 620–663.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00377.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kung, Peter (2016): “You Really Do Imagine It: Against Error Theories of Imagination”, Noûs 50 (1), 90–120.10.1111/nous.12060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, Jennifer (2007): “Norms of Assertion”, Noûs 41 (4), 594–626.10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00664.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamarque, Peter (1981): “How Can We Fear and Pity Fictions?”, British Journal of Aesthetics 21 (4), 291–304.10.1093/bjaesthetics/21.4.291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamarque, Peter (1990): “Reasoning to What Is True in Fiction”, Argumentation 4, 333–346.10.1007/BF00173970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamarque, Peter (1996): Fictional Points of View, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lamarque, Peter (2009b): Review of Much Ado about Nonexistence: Fiction and Reference, by Martinich, A. P. and Stroll, Avrum, Philosophical Review, 118 (3), 406–409.10.1215/00318108-2009-011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamarque, Peter, & Olsen, Stein Haugom (1994): Truth, Fiction and Literature: A Philosophical Perspective, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Langland-Hassan, Peter (2020): Explaining Imagination, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198815068.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauria, Federico (2017): “The ‘Guise of the Ought-to-Be’: A Deontic View of the Intentionality of Desire”, in Lauria, F. & Deonna, J. (eds.), The Nature of Desire, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 139–164.Google Scholar
Levinson, Jerrold (1992): “Intention and Interpretation: A Last Look”, in Iseminger, G. (ed.), Intention and Interpretation, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, pp. 221–256.Google Scholar
Levinson, Jerrold (1996): “Film Music and Narrative Agency”, in Bordwell, D. & Carroll, N. (eds.), Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 248–282.Google Scholar
Levinson, Jerrold (1998): “Two Notions of Interpretation”, in Haapala, A. & Naukkarinen, O. (eds.), Interpretation and Its Boundaries, Helsinki: Helsinki University Press, pp. 2–21. Also in his Contemplating Art, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2006, pp. 275–287.Google Scholar
Levinson, Jerrold (2010): “Defending Hypothetical Intentionalism”, British Journal of Aesthetics 50, 129–150.10.1093/aesthj/ayp072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Jerrold (2016): “Aesthetic Contextualism”, in his Aesthetic Pursuits, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 17–27.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198767213.003.0003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinstein, Ben (2007): “Facts, Interpretation, and Truth in Fiction”, British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (1), 64–75.10.1093/aesthj/ayl039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Arnon (2015): “Modeling Without Models”, Philosophical Studies 172, 781–98.10.1007/s11098-014-0333-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David (1970): “General Semantics”, Synthese 22, 18–67. Reprinted in D. Lewis, Philosophical Papers, vol. 1, pp. 189–229, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.10.1007/BF00413598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David (1978): “Truth in Fiction”, American Philosophical Quarterly 15, 37–46. Reprinted with postscripts in D. Lewis, Philosophical Papers, vol. 1, pp. 261–280, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983, from which I quote.Google Scholar
Lewis, David (1979): “Attitudes De Dicto and De Se”, Philosophical Review 88, 513–543.10.2307/2184843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David (1982): “Logic for Equivocators”, Noûs 16, 431–414.10.2307/2216219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David (1983): “New Work for a Theory of Universals”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61, 343–377.10.1080/00048408312341131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David (1988): “Relevant Implication”, Theoria 54 (3), 161–174.10.1111/j.1755-2567.1988.tb00716.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, Shen-yi, & Gendler, Tamar (2020): “Imagination”, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/imagination/puzzles.html.Google Scholar
Liebesman, David, & Sterken, Rachel Katharine (2021): “Generics and the Metaphysics of Kinds”, Philosophy Compass 16 (7), e12754.10.1111/phc3.12754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Szu-Yen (2023): “Defending the Hypothetical Author”, British Journal of Aesthetics 63 (4), 579–599.10.1093/aesthj/ayac062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lind, Richard (1980): “Attention and the Aesthetic Object”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 39 (2), 131–142.10.1111/1540_6245.jaac39.2.0131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lind, Richard (1992): “The Aesthetic Essence of Art”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 50 (2), 117–129.10.1111/1540_6245.jaac50.2.0117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingston, Paisley (1993): “What’s the Story?”, SubStance 22 (2/3), 98–112.10.2307/3685273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingston, Paisley (2005): Art and Intention: A Philosophical Study, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199278067.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorand, Ruth (2001): “Telling a Story or Telling a World?”, British Journal of Aesthetics 41, 425–443.10.1093/bjaesthetics/41.4.425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludlow, Peter (2014): Living Words: Meaning Underdetermination and the Dynamic Lexicon, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198712053.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lycan, William G. (2012): “Desire Considered as a Propositional Attitude”, Philosophical Perspectives 26, 201–215.10.1111/phpe.12003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Margaret (1954): “The Language of Fiction”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society suppl. vol. 28, 165–184.10.1093/aristoteliansupp/28.1.165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, Emar (2017): “Fictional Names in Psychologistic Semantics”, Theoretical Linguistics 43 (1–2), 1–45.10.1515/tl-2017-0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, Eric (2014): “Thinking Is Believing”, Inquiry 57 (1), 55–96.10.1080/0020174X.2014.858417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marías, Javier (1998): Negra Espalda Del Tiempo, Madrid: Alfaguara. (English translation by Esther Allen, Vintage International 2013, from which I quote.)Google Scholar
Marques, Teresa, & García-Carpintero, Manuel (2014): “Disagreement about Taste: Commonality Presuppositions and Coordination”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (4), 701–723.10.1080/00048402.2014.922592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marques, Teresa, & García-Carpintero, Manuel (2020): “Really Expressive Presuppositions and How to Block Them”, Grazer Philosophische Studien 97, 138–158.10.1163/18756735-09701008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsili, Neri (2023): “Fictions that Purport to Tell the Truth”, Philosophical Quarterly 73 (2), 509–531.10.1093/pq/pqac035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsili, Neri (2024): “Fictions that Don’t Tell the Truth”, Philosophical Studies 181, 1025–1046.10.1007/s11098-024-02098-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinich, A. P. (1980): “Conversational Maxims and Some Philosophical Problems”, Philosophical Quarterly 30 (120), 215–228.10.2307/2219243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinich, A. P., & Stroll, Avrum (2007): Much Ado about Nonexistence: Fiction and Reference, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Matravers, Derek (1997): “The Paradox of Fiction”, in Hjort, M. & Laver, S. (eds.), Emotion and the Arts, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 78–92.10.1093/oso/9780195111040.003.0006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matravers, Derek (2014): Fiction and Narrative, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199647019.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthen, Mohan (2017): “The Pleasure of Art”, Australasian Philosophical Review 1 (1), 6–28.10.1080/24740500.2017.1287034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, Kris, & Bradley, Ben (2008): “Desires”, Mind 117, 267–302.10.1093/mind/fzn044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinn, Colin (2004): Mindsight: Image, Dream, Meaning, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McGinn, Colin (2009): “Imagination”, in McLaughlin, B., Beckermann, A., & Walter, S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 595–606.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199262618.003.0035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, Rafe (2015): “Literary Thickness”, British Journal of Aesthetics 55 (3), 343–360.Google Scholar
McHugh, Conor, & Way, Jonathan (2016): “Fitness First”, Ethics 126, 575–606.10.1086/684712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, Paul, & Van De Putte, Frederik (2021): “Deontic Logic”, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/logic-deontic/.Google Scholar
Meinong, Alexius (1902): Ueber Annahmen, Leipzig: J. A. Barth. Erg.-Bd. [Suppl. Vol.] II of Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane. Reprinted in Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe [Complete Edition], ed. Haller, R. & Kindinger, R., in collaboration with Chisholm, R. M., 7 vols., 1968–1978, Graz: Akademische Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt, Vol. IV: XV–XXV and 1–384.Google Scholar
Mele, Alfred (2003): Motivation and Agency, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/019515617X.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaelian, Kourken, Klein, Stanley B., & Szpunar, Karl K. (eds.) (2016): Seeing the Future: Theoretical Perspectives on Future-Oriented Mental Time Travel, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190241537.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaelian, Kourken, Perrin, Denis, & Sant’Anna, André (2020): “Continuities and Discontinuities Between Imagination and Memory: The View from Philosophy”, in Abraham, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 293–310.10.1017/9781108580298.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Patrick L. (2013): “Monstrous Maturity on Mulholland Dr.”, in Giannopoulou, Z. (ed.), Mulholland Drive: Philosophers on Film, London: Routledge, pp. 97–120.Google Scholar
Miller, Richard (1998): “Three Versions of Objectivity: Aesthetic, Moral, and Scientific”, in Levinson, J. (ed.), Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 26–59.10.1017/CBO9780511663888.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, Richard (1994): “The Expression of Feeling in Imagination”, Philosophical Review 103 (1), 75–106.10.2307/2185873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motoarcă, Ioan-Radu (2017): “A Bad Theory of Truth in Fiction”, British Journal of Aesthetics 57 (4), 379–387.10.1093/aesthj/ayx028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulligan, Kevin (1998): “From Appropriate Emotions to Values”, Monist 81 (1), 161–188.10.5840/monist199881114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munroe, Wade (2016): “Words on Psycholinguistics”, Journal of Philosophy 113 (12), 593–616.10.5840/jphil20161131240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munroe, Wade (2022): “What It Takes to Make a Word (Token)”, Synthese 200, article 287.10.1007/s11229-022-03751-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, Iris (1997): Existentialists and Mystics, Conradi, P. (ed.), Penguin Press: London.Google Scholar
Nanay, Bence (2023): “Against Imagination”, in McLaughlin, B. & Cohen, J. (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind 2nd ed., Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 553–569.10.1002/9781394259847.ch30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nawar, Tamer (2021): “Veritism Refuted? Understanding, Idealization, and the Facts”, Synthese 198, 4295–4313.10.1007/s11229-019-02342-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neale, Stephen (2016): “Silent Reference”, in Ostertag, G. (ed.), Meaning and Other Things, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 229–342.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684939.003.0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neale, Stephen, & Schiffer, Stephen (2021): “How Demonstratives and Indexicals Really Work”, in Biggs, S. & Geirsson, H. (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Reference, London: Routledge, pp. 439–448.Google Scholar
Neill, Alex, & Ridley, Aaron (2012): “Relational Theories of Art: The History of an Error”, British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (2), 141–151.10.1093/aesthj/ays004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Shaun (2006): “Just the Imagination: Why Imagining Doesn’t Behave Like Believing”, Mind & Language 21 (4), 459–474.Google Scholar
Nolan, Daniel (2007): “A Consistent Reading of Sylvan’s Box”, The Philosophical Quarterly 57, 667–673.10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.501.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha (1990): “‘Finely Aware and Richly Responsible’: Literature and the Moral Imagination”, in her Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature, pp. 148–167, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oddie, Graham (2017): “Desire and the Good: In Search of the Right Fit”, in Lauria, F. & Deonna, J. A. (eds.), The Nature of Desire, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 29–56.Google Scholar
Ohmann, Richard (1971): “Speech Acts and the Definition of Literature”, Philosophy & Rhetoric, 4 (1), 1–19.Google Scholar
Orlando, Eleonora (2021): “Fictional Names and Fictional Concepts: A Moderate Fictionalist Account”, Organon F 28 (1), 107–134.10.31577/orgf.2021.28106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacocke, Christopher (1985): “Imagination, Experience, and Possibility: A Berkeleian View Defended”, in Foster, J. & Robinson, H. (eds.), Essays on Berkeley, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–35.Google Scholar
Pettersson, Anders (1993): “On Walton’s and Currie’s Analyses of Literary Fiction”, Philosophy and Literature 17: 84–97.10.1353/phl.1993.0079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, John F. (1999): “Truth and Inference in Fiction”, Philosophical Studies 94, 273–293.10.1023/A:1004239709212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picciuto, Elizabeth & Carruthers, Peter (2016): “Imagination and Pretense”, in Kind, A. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of the Imagination, London: Routledge, pp. 314–325.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. (2020): Filmed Thought: Cinema as Reflective Form, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Carl (2005): “What a Documentary Is, After All”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63, 105–117.10.1111/j.0021-8529.2005.00188.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plebani, Matteo, & Spolaore, Giuseppe (2021): “Subject Matter: A Modest Proposal”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 71 (3), 605–622.10.1093/pq/pqaa054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponech, Trevor (1997): “What Is Non-Fiction Cinema?”, in Allen, R. & Smith, M. (eds.), Film Theory and Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 203–220.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198159216.003.0009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, Mary Louise (1977): Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Predelli, Stefano (1997): “Talk about Fiction”, Erkenntnis 46, 69–77.10.1023/A:1005341818171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Predelli, Stefano (2002): “‘Holmes’ and Holmes – A Millian Analysis of Names from Fiction”, Dialectica 56 (3), 261–279.Google Scholar
Predelli, Stefano (2005): Contexts: Meaning, Truth, and the Use of Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199281734.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Predelli, Stefano (2010): “Malapropisms and the Simple Picture of Communication”, Mind & Language 25 (3), 329–345.10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01392.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Predelli, Stefano (2017): Proper Names: A Millian Account, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198778158.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Predelli, Stefano (2019): “Determination and Uniformity: The Problem with Speech-Act Theories of Fiction”, Erkenntnis 84, 309–324.10.1007/s10670-017-9959-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Predelli, Stefano (2020): Fictional Discourse: A Radical Fictionalist Semantics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198854128.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Predelli, Stefano (2021): “Fictional Tellers: A Radical Fictionalist Semantics for Fictional Discourse”, Organon F 28 (1), 76–106.10.31577/orgf.2021.28105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, Graham (1997): “Sylvan’s Box: A Short Story and Ten Morals”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38, 573–582.10.1305/ndjfl/1039540770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, Graham (2011): “Creating Non-Existents”, in Lihoreau, F. (ed.), Truth in Fiction, Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, pp. 107–118.Google Scholar
Proudfoot, Diane (2006): “Possible Worlds Semantics and Fiction”, Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (1), 9–40.10.1007/s10992-005-9005-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (1975): “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’”, in Gunderson, K. (ed.), Language, Mind, and Knowledge (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 7), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 131–193.Google Scholar
Quilty-Dunn, Jake (2015): “Believing Our Eyes: The Role of False Belief in the Experience of Cinema”, British Journal of Aesthetics 55 (3), 269–283.10.1093/aesthj/ayv016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W.V.O. (1951): “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”, Philosophical Review 60 (1), 20–43. Reprinted in in his From a Logical Point of View, 2nd ed., revised, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980, pp. 20–4610.2307/2181906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowitz, Peter (1977): “Truth in Fiction: A Reexamination of Audiences”, Critical Inquiry 4 (1), 121–141.10.1086/447927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railton, Peter (2012): “That Obscure Object, Desire”, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 86 (2), 22–46.Google Scholar
Recanati, François (2000): Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta, Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5163.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recanati, François (2016): Mental Files in Flux, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198790358.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recanati, François (2018): “Fictional, Metafictional, Parafictional”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 118, 25–54.10.1093/arisoc/aoy001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recanati, François (2021): “Fictional Reference as Simulation”, in Maier, E. & Stokke, A. (eds.), The Language of Fiction, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 17–36.10.1093/oso/9780198846376.003.0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reicher, Maria (2012): “Knowledge from Fiction”, in Daiber, J., E.-M. Konrad, & T. Petraschka (eds.), Understanding Fiction: Knowledge and Meaning in Literature, Paderborn: Mentis, pp. 114–132.10.30965/9783957439598_010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, Marga (2005): “The Ellipsis Account of Fiction-Talk”, in Elugardo, R. & Stainton, R. (eds.), Ellipsis and Nonsentential Speech, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 203–215.10.1007/1-4020-2301-4_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, Mark (2013): “What Are Propositions?”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43 (5–6), 702–719.10.1080/00455091.2013.870738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricks, Christopher (1996): “Literature and the Matter of Fact”, in his Essays in Appreciation, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 280–310.10.1093/oso/9780198183440.003.0010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridge, Michael (2021): “Individuating Games”, Synthese 198, 8823–8850.10.1007/s11229-020-02603-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riffaterre, Michael (1990): Fictional Truth, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.10.56021/9780801839337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, Luke (2023): “Longings in Limbo: A New Defence of I‑Desires”, Erkenntnis 88, 3331–3355.10.1007/s10670-021-00505-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, M. W. (1997): “Lamarque and Olsen on Literature and Truth”, Philosophical Quarterly 47, 322–341.10.1111/1467-9213.00062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, Anne (2007): “‘Policemen in a Search Team’: Iris Murdoch’s The Black Prince and Ian McEwan’s Atonement”, in Rowe, A. (ed.), Iris Murdoch: A Reassessment, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, pp. 148–160.10.1057/9780230625174_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert (1933): “Imaginary Objects”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society suppl. vol. 12, 18–43.10.1093/aristoteliansupp/12.1.18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saemi, Amir (2015): “Aiming at the Good”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (2), 197–121.10.1080/00455091.2015.1054230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sainsbury, Mark (2014): “Fictional Worlds and Fiction Operators”, in García-Carpintero, M. & Martí, G. (eds.), Empty Representations: Reference and Non-Existence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 277–289.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199647057.003.0012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sainsbury, Mark (2021): “Fictional Names: Reference, Definiteness and Ontology”, Organon F 28 (1), 44–59.10.31577/orgf.2021.28103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salis, Fiora (2016): “The Problem of Satisfaction Conditions and the Dispensability of i-Desire”, Erkenntnis 81 (1), 105–118.10.1007/s10670-015-9731-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salis, Fiora (2021): “The Meaning of Fictional Names”, Organon F 28 (1), 9–43.10.31577/orgf.2021.28102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, Nathan (1998): “Nonexistence”, Noûs 32, 277–319.10.1111/0029-4624.00101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, Charles T. (1967): “Blow-Up: Sorting Things”, The American Scholar 37 (1), 120–131.Google Scholar
Saucelli, Andrea (2024): “Pretending and Disbelieving”, Inquiry 67 (6), 1991–2004.10.1080/0020174X.2021.1982403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savile, Anthony (1982): The Test of Time: An Essay in Philosophical Aesthetics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Sarah (2012): “Empty Names”, in Russell, G. & Fara, D. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Language, New York: Routledge, pp. 153–162.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. (1998): What We Owe to Each Other, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schacter, Daniel L., & Addis, Donna Rose (2020): “Memory and Imagination: Perspectives on Constructive Episodic Simulation”, in Abraham, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 111–131.10.1017/9781108580298.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, Karl (2013): “Perception and the Rational Force of Desire”, Journal of Philosophy 110, 258–281.10.5840/jphil2013110528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schapiro, Tamar (2014): “What Are Theories of Desire Theories of?”, Analytic Philosophy 55 (2), 131–50.10.1111/phib.12043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schellenberg, Susanna (2013): “Belief and Desire in Imagination and Immersion”, Journal of Philosophy 110 (9), 497–517.10.5840/jphil2013110914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, Stephen (2017): “Intention and Convention in the Theory of Meaning”, in Hale, B., Wright, C., & Miller, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, 2nd ed., Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 49–72.10.1002/9781118972090.ch3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Tim (2020): “Desire”, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/desire/.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Tim (2004): Three Faces of Desire, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195172379.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schueler, G. F. (1995): Desire: Its Role in Practical Reason and the Explanation of Action, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2378.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scruton, Roger (1974): Art and Imagination: A Study in the Philosophy of Mind, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Searle, John (1969): Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John (1975): “The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse”, New Literary History 6, 319–332.10.2307/468422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semeijn, Merel (2020): “The ‘In’ and ‘According to’ Operators”, Proceedings of the ESSLLI & WESSLLI Student Session 2020.Google Scholar
Semeijn, Merel & Zalta, Edward (2021): “Revisiting the ‘Wrong Kind of Object’ Problem”, Organon F 28 (1), 168–197.10.31577/orgf.2021.28108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Ashley (2020): “Desire and Satisfaction”, Philosophical Quarterly 70, 371–384.10.1093/pq/pqz068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Ashley (2021): “Desire and What It’s Rational to Do”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 99 (4), 761–775.10.1080/00048402.2020.1822424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, Mandy (2018): “Convention, Intention, and the Conversational Record”, in Preyer, G. (ed.), Beyond Semantics and Pragmatics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 284–302.Google Scholar
Sinhababu, Neil (2013): “The Desire-Belief Account of Intention Explains Everything”, Noûs 47, 680–696.10.1111/j.1468-0068.2012.00864.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithies, Declan, & Weiss, Jeremy (2019): “Affective Experience, Desire, and Reasons for Action”, Analytic Philosophy 60 (1), 27–54.10.1111/phib.12144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smuts, Aaron (2009): “Story Identity and Story Type”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 67, 5–14.10.1111/j.1540-6245.2008.01330.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soames, Scott (2015): Rethinking Language, Mind, and Meaning, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sparshott, Francis (1990): “Imagination – The Very idea”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 48 (1), 1–8.Google Scholar
Spaulding, Shannon (2016): “Imagination Through Knowledge”, in Kind, A. & Kung, P. (eds.), Knowledge Through Imagination, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 207–226.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716808.003.0010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Quayshawn (2014): “A Radical Solution to the Race Problem”, Philosophy of Science 81 (5), 1025–1038.10.1086/677694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Quayshawn (2018): “A Racial Classification for Medical Genetics”, Philosophical Studies 175 (5), 1013–1037.10.1007/s11098-018-1072-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Quayshawn (2019): “A More Radical Solution to the Race Problem”, Proceedings of The Aristotelian Society suppl. vol. 93, 25–48.10.1093/arisup/akz011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. et al. (2010): “Epistemic Vigilance”, Mind & Language 25, 359–393.10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert (1978): “Assertion”, in Cole, P. (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9, New York: Academic Press, pp. 315–332. Included in R. Stalnaker, Context and Content, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 78–95, to which I refer.Google Scholar
Stecker, Robert (2006): “Moderate Actual Intentionalism Defended”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64, 429–438.10.1111/j.1540-594X.2006.00221.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stecker, Robert (2010): Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art, 2nd ed., Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.10.5040/9798216383604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stecker, Robert (2013): “Film Narration, Imaginative Seeing, and Seeing-In”, Projections: The Journal for Movies and Mind 7 (1), 147–154.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Leslie (2003): “Twelve Conceptions of Imagination”, British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (3), 238–259.10.1093/bjaesthetics/43.3.238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, Kathleen (2011): “Fictive Utterance and Imagining”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society suppl. vol. 85, 145–162.10.1111/j.1467-8349.2011.00200.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, Kathleen (2017): Only Imagine: Fiction, Interpretation and Imagination, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198798347.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, Kathleen (2021): Material Girls: Why Reality Matters for Feminism, London: Fleet, Little Brown.Google Scholar
Stokes, Dustin (2006): “Art and Modal Knowledge”, in Kieran, M. & Lopes, D. M. (eds.), Knowing Art: Essays in Aesthetics and Epistemology, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 67–81.10.1007/978-1-4020-5265-1_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stojnić, Una (2022): “Just Words: Intentions, Tolerance and Lexical Selection”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 105 (1), 3–17.10.1111/phpr.12781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokke, Andreas (2021): “Fictional Names and Individual Concepts”, Synthese 198, 7829–7859.10.1007/s11229-020-02550-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokke, Andreas (2022): “Fiction and Importation”, Linguistics and Philosophy 45, 65–89.10.1007/s10988-020-09321-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokke, Andreas (2023a): “Fictional Force”, Philosophical Studies 180, 3099–3120.10.1007/s11098-023-02035-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokke, Andreas (2023b): “Fictional Names and Co-Identification”, Philosophers’ Imprint 23, article 19.Google Scholar
Stokke, Andreas (2025): “Fiction as a Defeater”, Philosophical Quarterly, 75 (2), 718–733.10.1093/pq/pqae020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, Peter (1971): “Imagination and Perception”, in Foster, L. & Swanson, J. W. (eds.), Experience and Theory, London: Duckworth, pp. 31–54.Google Scholar
Suits, Bernard (1978): The Grasshopper: Games, Life and Utopia, Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1978. Reissued in 2005, Canada: Broadview Press.10.3138/9781487574338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan-Bissett, Ema (2019): “Biased by Our Imaginings”, Mind & Language 34, 627–647.10.1111/mila.12225CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutrop, Margit (2002): “Imagination and the Act of Fiction-Making”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (3), 332–344.Google Scholar
Szabó, Zoltán Gendler (2020): “The Goal of Conversation”, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 94 (1), 57–86.10.1093/arisup/akaa005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, David E. (2018): “A Minimal Characterization of Indeterminacy”, Philosophers’ Imprint 18, article 5.Google Scholar
Taylor, David E. (2020): “Deflationism, Creeping Minimalism, and Explanations of Content”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101 (1), 101–129.10.1111/phpr.12572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenenbaum, Sergio (2008): “Appearing Good: A Reply to Schroeder”, Social Theory and Practice 34, 131–138.10.5840/soctheorpract20083417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina (2011): “The Puzzle of Indirect Speech”, Journal of Pragmatics 43, 2861–2865.10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrone, Enrico (2020a): “Imagination and Perception in Film Experience”, Ergo 7, article 5.Google Scholar
Terrone, Enrico (2020b): “Documentaries, Docudramas, and Perceptual Beliefs”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78 (1), 43–55.10.1111/jaac.12703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrone, Enrico (2021a): “The Standard of Correctness and the Ontology of Depiction”, American Philosophical Quarterly 58 (4).10.2307/48619323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrone, Enrico (2021b): “Twofileness: A Functionalist Approach to Fictional Characters and Mental Files”, Erkenntnis 86, 129–147.10.1007/s10670-018-0097-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Nigel J. T. (2014): “The Multidimensional Spectrum of Imagination: Images, Dreams, Hallucinations, and Active, Imaginative Perception”, Humanities 3 (2), 132–184.10.3390/h3020132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. (1999): Fiction and Metaphysics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. (2003): “Speaking of Fictional Characters”, Dialectica 57: 205–223.10.1111/j.1746-8361.2003.tb00266.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. (2014): “Public Artifacts, Intentions and Norms”, in Franssen, M., Kroes, P., Reydon, T. A. C., & Vermaas, P. E. (eds.), Artefact Kinds: Ontology and the Human-Made World, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 48–49.Google Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. (2021): “What Do Easy Inferences Get Us?”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 102 (3), 736–744.10.1111/phpr.12769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobia, Kevin P., Newman, George E., & Knobe, Joshua (2020): “Water Is and Is Not H2O”, Mind & Language 35 (2), 183–208.10.1111/mila.12234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unnsteinsson, Elmar (2017): “A Gricean Theory of Malaprops”, Mind & Language 32 (4), 446–462.10.1111/mila.12149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urmson, J. O. (1967): “Memory and Imagination”, Mind 76 (301), 83–91.10.1093/mind/LXXVI.301.83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Mosselaer, Nele (2020): “Imaginative Desires and Interactive Fiction: On Wanting to Shoot Fictional Zombies”, British Journal of Aesthetics 60 (3), 241–251.10.1093/aesthj/ayz049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderveken, Daniel (1991): “Non-Literal Speech Acts and Conversational Maxims”, in Lepore, E. & van Gulick, R. (eds.), John Searle and His Critics, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 371–384.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter (1977): “Creatures of Fiction”, American Philosophical Quarterly 14, 299–308.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter (1983): “Fiction and Metaphysics”, Philosophy and Literature 7 (1), 67–77.10.1353/phl.1983.0059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter (2003): “Existence, Ontological Commitment, and Fictional Entities”, in Loux, M. J. & Zimmerman, D. W. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 131–157.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Neil (2013): “The Meaning of ‘Imagine’ Part I: Constructive Imagination”, Philosophy Compass 8 (3), 220–230.10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00508.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Neil (2021): “Imagining Stories: Attitudes and Operators”, Philosophical Studies 178, 639–664.10.1007/s11098-020-01449-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, David (2000): “On the Aim of Belief”, in his The Possibility of Practical Reason, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 244–281.10.1093/oso/9780198238256.003.0011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vicente, Agustín, & Falkum, Ingrid L. (2017): “Polysemy”, in Aronoff, M. (ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Viebahn, Emanuel (ms): “The Poet Affirmeth”.Google Scholar
Voltolini, Alberto (2006): “Fiction as a Base of Interpretation Contexts”, Synthese 153, 23–47.10.1007/s11229-006-0001-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voltolini, Alberto (2016): “The Nature of Fiction/Al Utterances”, Humana-Mente 25, 28–55.Google Scholar
Voltolini, Alberto (2021): “What We Can Learn from Literary Authors”, Acta Analytica 36, 479–499.10.1007/s12136-021-00467-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Solodkoff, Tatjana (2022): “Demoting Fictional Names – A Critical Note to Fictional Discourse: A Radical Fictionalist Semantics”, British Journal of Aesthetics 62 (2), 223–230.10.1093/aesthj/ayab024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Solodkoff, Tatjana, & Woodward, Richard (2017): “To Have and to Hold”, Philosophical Issues 27, 407–427.10.1111/phis.12107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, Lee (2015): “Serial Fiction, the End?”, British Journal of Aesthetics 55 (3), 323–341.10.1093/aesthj/ayv013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, Lee (2017): “Fictionality and Imagination, Revisited”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (1), 15–21.10.1111/jaac.12341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, Kendall (1970): “Categories of Art”, Philosophical Review 79, 334–367.10.2307/2183933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, Kendall (1978): “On Fearing Fictions”, Journal of Philosophy 75, 5–27. Included in his In Other Shoes: Music, Metaphor, Empathy, Existence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 252–272.10.2307/2025831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, Kendall (1983): “Fiction, Fiction-Making, and Styles of Fictionality”, Philosophy and Literature 7 (1), 78–88.10.1353/phl.1983.0004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, Kendall (1990): Mimesis and Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, Kendall (1994): “Morals in Fiction and Fictional Morality”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society suppl. vol. 68, 27–50.10.1093/aristoteliansupp/68.1.27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, Kendall (1997): “Spelunking, Simulation, and Slime”, in Hjort, M. & Laver, S. (eds.), Emotion and the Arts, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 37–49.10.1093/oso/9780195111040.003.0003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, Kendall (2015a): “Fictionality and Imagination – Mind the Gap”, in his In Other Shoes: Music, Metaphor, Empathy, Existence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 17–35.Google Scholar
Walton, Kendall (2015b): “‘It’s Only a Game!’: Sports as Fiction”, in his In Other Shoes: Music, Metaphor, Empathy, Existence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 77–83.Google Scholar
Walton, Kendall (2020): “Aesthetic Properties: Context Dependent and Perceptual”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78 (1), 79–84.10.1111/jaac.12702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, Jonathan, & Meskin, Aaron (2006): “Puzzling over the Imagination: Philosophical Problems, Architectural Solutions”, in Nichols, S. (ed.), The Architecture of the Imagination: New Essays on Pretence, Possibility, and Fiction, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 175–202.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199275731.003.0010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendorf, Richard (1982): “Antonioni’s Blow-Up: Implicated Artists and Unintentional Art”, Journal of Aesthetic Education 16 (1), 57–67.10.2307/3332386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildman, Nathan (2018): “The Possibility of Empty Fictions”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 77 (1), 35–42.10.1111/jaac.12620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildman, Nathan, & Folde, Christian (2017): “Fiction Unlimited”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (1), 73–80.10.1111/jaac.12332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildman, Nathan & Folde, Christian (2018): “No Trouble with Poetic Licence: A Reply to Xhignesse”, British Journal of Aesthetics 58 (3), 319–326.10.1093/aesthj/ayy020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1973): “Imagination and the Self”, in his Problems of the Self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 26–45.10.1017/CBO9780511621253.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1981): “Internal and External Reasons”, in his Moral Luck, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 101–113.10.1017/CBO9781139165860.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. Robert G., & Woodward, Richard (2021): “The Cognitive Role of Fictionality”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 102 (2), 423–438.10.1111/phpr.12660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy (1996): “Knowing and Asserting”, Philosophical Review 105, pp. 489–523. Included with some revisions as Chapter 11 of his Knowledge and Its Limits, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000, from which I quote.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy (2016): “Knowing by Imagining”, in Kind, A. & Kung, P. (eds.), Knowledge through Imagination, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 113–123.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716808.003.0005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy (2020): Suppose and Tell: The Semantics and Heuristics of Conditionals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198860662.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy (2022): The Philosophy of Philosophy, 2nd ed., Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781119616702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy (forthcoming): “Knowledge, Credence, and the Strength of Belief”, in Flowerree, A. K. & Reed, B. (eds.), Towards an Expansive Epistemology: Norms, Action, and the Social Sphere, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilson, George (1986): Narration in Light: Studies in Cinematic Point of View, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, George (2006): “Transparency and Twist in Narrative Fiction Film”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (1), 81–95.10.1111/j.0021-8529.2006.00231.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, George (2011): Seeing Fictions in Film: The Epistemology of Movies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199594894.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, W. K. Jr., & Beardsley, M. C. (1946): “The Intentional Fallacy”, The Sewanee Review 54 (3), 468–488.Google Scholar
Wiltsher, Nicholas (2019a): “Characterizing the Imaginative Attitude”, Philosophical Papers 48 (3), 437–469.10.1080/05568641.2018.1531725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiltsher, Nicholas (2019b): “Imagination: A Lens, Not a Mirror”, Philosophers’ Imprint 19, article 30.Google Scholar
Wood, Michael (1998): The Magician’s Doubts: Nabokov and the Risks of Fiction, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Robin (2013): Ingmar Bergman (ed. Grant, B. K.), Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Woods, John (2018): Truth in Fiction: Rethinking Its Logic, Cham: Synthese International Publishers.10.1007/978-3-319-72658-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, Richard (2011): “Truth in Fiction”, Philosophy Compass 6 (3), 158–167.10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00367.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, Richard (2014): “Walton on Fictionality”, Philosophy Compass 9 (12), 825–836.10.1111/phc3.12178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, Richard (2016): “Fictionality and Photography”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (3), 279–289.10.1111/jaac.12284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xhignesse, Michel-Antoine (2016): “The Trouble with Poetic Licence”, British Journal of Aesthetics 56 (2), 149–161.10.1093/aesthj/ayv053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xhignesse, Michel-Antoine (2021a): “Imagining Fictional Contradictions”, Synthese 199, 3169–3188.10.1007/s11229-020-02929-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xhignesse, Michel-Antoine (2021b): “Exploding Stories and the Limits of Fiction”, Philosophical Studies 178, 675–692.10.1007/s11098-020-01451-wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yablo, Stephen (1993): “Is Conceivability a Guide to Possibility?”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53, 1–42.10.2307/2108052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yablo, Stephen (2014b): “Carnap’s Paradox and Easy Ontology”, Journal of Philosophy 111 (9/10), 470–501.10.5840/jphil20141119/1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yablo, Stephen (2020): “Nonexistence and Aboutness: The Bandersnatches of Dubuque”, Crítica 52, 165, 77–100.Google Scholar
Zangwill, Nick (1998): “Direction of Fit and Normative Functionalism”, Philosophical Studies 91 (2), 545–574.10.1023/A:1004252526870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zangwill, Nick (2010): “Normativity and the Metaphysics of Mind”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1), 21–39.10.1080/00048400902739610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zemach, Eddy (1997): Real Beauty, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Zemach, Eddy (1998): “Tom Sawyer and The Beige Unicorn”, British Journal of Aesthetics 38 (2), 167–179.10.1093/bjaesthetics/38.2.167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeman, Adam (2020): “Aphantasia”, in Abraham, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 692–710.10.1017/9781108580298.042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zipfel, Frank (2015): “Narratorless Narration? Some Reflections on the Arguments for and Against the Ubiquity of Narrators in Fictional Narration”, in Birke, D. & Köppe, T. (eds.), Author and Narrator: Transdisciplinary Contributions to a Narratological Debate, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 45–80.10.1515/9783110348552.45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucchi, Sandro (2017): “Games of Make-Believe and Factual Information”, Theoretical Linguistics 43 (1–2), 95–101.10.1515/tl-2017-0007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucchi, Sandro (2021): “On the Generation of Content”, in Maier, E. & Stokke, A. (eds.), The Language of Fiction, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 107–130.10.1093/oso/9780198846376.003.0005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.