Book contents
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 August 2025
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Torts and RetributionThe Case for Punitive Damages, pp. 271 - 294Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Abel, R, “The Real Tort Crisis – Too Few Claims” (1987) 48 Ohio State Law Journal 443.Google Scholar
Abrams, K and Keren, H, “Who’s Afraid of Law and the Emotions?” (2010) 94 Minnesota Law Review 1997.Google Scholar
Ackerman, F and Heinzerling, L, Priceless: On Knowing the Price of Everything and the Value of Nothing (The New Press 2004).Google Scholar
Ames, D L and Fiske, S T, “Intentional Harms Are Worse, Even When They’re Not” (2013) 24(9) Psychological Science 1755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, E S and Pildes, R H, “Expressive Theories of Law: A General Restatement” (2000) 148 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alstott, L, “A Fine Is Not a Price: Insights for Law,” in Hanson, J (ed), Ideology, Psychology, and Law (Oxford University Press 2012) 185–92.Google Scholar
Arlen, J and Kornhauser, L A, “Battle for Our Souls: A Psychological Justification for Corporate and Individual Liability for Organizational Misconduct” (2023) 3 University of Illinois Law Review 673.Google Scholar
Arvind, T T and Gray, J, “The Limits of Technocracy: Private Law’s Future in the Regulatory State,” in Barker, K, Fairweather, K and Grantham, R (eds), Private Law in the 21st Century (Hart Publishing 2017) 237–55.Google Scholar
Ausness, R C, “Danger Is My Business: The Right to Manufacture Unsafe Products” (2014) 67 Arkansas Law Review 827.Google Scholar
Baker, T, “Blood Money, New Money, and the Moral Economy of Tort Law in Action” (2001) 35(2) Law and Society Review 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandes, S A, “Feeling and Thinking Like a Lawyer: Cognition, Emotion and the Practice and Progress of Law” (2021) 89 Fordham Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Bandes, S A, “Introduction,” in Bandes, S A (ed), The Passions of Law (New York University Press 2000) 1–15.Google Scholar
Bant, E, “Culpable Corporate Minds” (2021) 48 University of Western Australia Law Review 352.Google Scholar
Bant, E and Paterson, J M, “Systems of Misconduct: Corporate Culpability and Statutory Unconscionability” (2021) 15 Journal of Equity 63.Google Scholar
Barker, K, “Punishment in Private Law – No Such Thing Anymore,” in Bant, E, Courtney, W, Goudkamp, J and Paterson, J M (eds), Punishment and Private Law (Hart Publishing 2021) 35–62.Google Scholar
Barker, K, “Private Law as a Complex System: Agendas for the Twenty-First Century,” in Barker, K, Fairweather, K and Grantham, R (eds), Private Law in the 21st Century (Hart Publishing 2017) 3–28.Google Scholar
Barker, K, “Private and Public: The Mixed Conception of Vindication in Torts and Private Law,” in Pitel, S G A, Neyers, J W and Chamberlain, E (eds), Tort Law: Challenging Orthodoxy (Hart Publishing 2013) 59–93.Google Scholar
Baron, J, “The Effect of Normative Beliefs on Anticipated Emotions” (1992) 63 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron, J, “Tradeoffs among Reasons for Action” (1986) 16 Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, J and Ritov, I, “Intuitions about Penalties and Compensation in the Context of Tort Law” (1993) 7 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beever, A, “Justice and Punishment in Tort: A Comparative Theoretical Analysis,” in Rickett, C E F (ed), Justifying Private Law Remedies (Hart Publishing 2008) 249–98.Google Scholar
Beever, A, “The Structure of Aggravated and Exemplary Damages” (2003) 23 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, L, “Feminist (Re)Torts: Thoughts on the Liability Crisis, Mass Torts, Power, and Responsibilities” (1990) 4 Duke Law Journal 848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benforado, A and Hanson, J D, “The Cost of Dispositionism: The Premature Demise of Situationist Law and Economics” (2005) 64 Maryland Law Review 24.Google Scholar
Bennett Moses, L, “Regulating in the Face of Sociotechnical Change,” in Brownsword, R, Scotford, E and Yeung, K (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Law, Regulation and Technology (Oxford University Press 2017) 573–96.Google Scholar
Bentham, J, “Principles of Penal Law,” in Bowring, J (ed), The Works of Jeremy Bentham (Russell & Russell 1962) 365–580.Google Scholar
Berman, M N, “Proportionality, Constraint, and Culpability” (2021) 15 Criminal Law and Philosophy 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, A, “Q: What Is Tort? A: Categorical Hurt” (2021) 14(2) Journal of Tort Law 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, A, “The Communities that Make Standards of Care Possible’ (2002) 77 Chicago-Kent Law Review 735.Google Scholar
Berryman, J, “Reconceptualizing Aggravated Damages: Recognizing the Dignitary Interest and Referential Loss” (2004) 41 San Diego Law Review 1521.Google Scholar
Best, E K, “Atypical Actors and Tort Law’s Expressive Function” (2012) 96 Marquette Law Review 461.Google Scholar
Bilz, K, “Testing the Expressive Theory of Punishment” (2016) 13(2) Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, G, “Victims and the Significance of Causing Harm” (2008) 28 Pace Law Review 713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birds, J, Lynch, B and Paul, S, MacGillivray on Insurance Law (14th ed.) (Sweet and Maxwell 2018).Google Scholar
Blanchard, S, “Nominal Damages as Vindication” (2022) 30(1) George Mason Law Review 227.Google Scholar
Borghetti, J-S, “Taking EU Product Liability Law Seriously: How Can the Product Liability Directive Effectively Contribute to Consumer Protection?” (2023) 1 French Journal of Legal Policy 136.Google Scholar
Borghetti, J-S, Santos Silva, M, Fairgrieve, D, García, P, Keirse, A, Machnikowski, P, Rajneri, E, Schmon, C, Ulbeck, V, Vallone, V and Zech, H, “Relevance of Risk-benefit for Assessing Defectiveness of a Product: A Comparative Study of Thirteen European Legal Systems” (2021) 29(1) European Review of Private Law 91.Google Scholar
Borghetti, J-S, “Punitive Damages in France,” in Koziol, H and Wilcox, V (eds), Punitive Damages: Common Law and Civil Law Perspectives (Springer 2009) 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, W, Kysar, D A and Rachlinski, J J, “Law, Environment, and the ‘Nondismal’ Social Sciences” (2012) 8 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, A, Digital Empires, The Global Battle to Regulate Technology (Oxford University Press 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, W J (Jr), “Reason, Passion, and ‘The Progress of the Law’” (1988) 10 Cardozo Law Review 3.Google Scholar
Bronsteen, J, Buccafusco, C and Masur, J, “Happiness and Punishment” (2009) 76 University of Chicago Law Review 1037.Google Scholar
Bublick, E M, “Mathias v Accor Economy Lodging, Inc (2003): Judge Richard A. Posner’s Message and Method on Punitive Damages,” in Goudkamp, J and Katsampouka, E (eds), Landmark Cases in the Law of Punitive Damages (Hart Publishing 2023) 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buell, S W, “Retiring Corporate Retribution” (2020) 83 Law and Contemporary Problems 25.Google Scholar
Busch, C, “Rethinking Product Liability Rules for Online Marketplaces: A Comparative Perspective” (July 31, 2021) Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3784466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrows, A, “Damages and Rights,” in Nolan, D and Robertson, A (eds), Rights and Private Law (Hart Publishing 2012) 275–308.Google Scholar
Burrows, A, Remedies for Torts and Breach of Contract (3rd ed.) (Oxford University Press 2004).Google Scholar
Burrows, A, “Reforming Exemplary Damages: Expansion or Abolition?” in Birks, P (ed), Wrongs and Remedies in the Twenty First Century (Oxford University Press 1996) 153–74.Google Scholar
Büyüksagis, E, Ebert, I, Fairgrieve, D, Meurkens, R C and Quarta, F, “Punitive Damages in Europe and Plea for the Recognition of Legal Pluralism” (2016) 1 European Business Law Review 137.Google Scholar
Calabresi, G, “The Complexities of Torts: The case of Punitive Damages,” in Madden, M Stuart (ed), Exploring Tort Law (Cambridge University Press 2005) 333–51.Google Scholar
Calabresi, G, “Some Thoughts on Risk Distribution and the Law of Torts” (1961) 70 Yale Law Journal 499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabresi, G, “Civil Recourse Theory’s Reductionism” (2013) 88 Indiana Law Journal 449.Google Scholar
Calabresi, G, “A Broader View of the Cathedral: The Significance of the Liability Rule, Correcting A Misapprehension” (2014) 77 Law and Contemporary Problems 1.Google Scholar
Calabresi, G and Melamed, A D, “Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral” (1972) 85 Harvard Law Review 1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, C, “Cognitive Emotions?” in Calhoun, C and Solomon, R C (eds), What Is An Emotion? Classic and Contemporary Readings (Oxford University Press 1984) 327–42.Google Scholar
Cane, P, “Searching for United States Tort Law in the Antipodes” (2011) 38 Pepperdine Law Review 257.Google Scholar
Cane, P, “Mens Rea in Tort Law” (2000) 20 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cane, P, “Retribution, Proportionality, and Moral Luck in Tort Law,” in Cane, P and Stapleton, J (eds), The Law of Obligations: Essays in Celebration of John Fleming (Oxford University Press 1998) 141–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelletti, M, “Comparative Reflections on Punishment in Tort Law,” in Borghetti, J-S and Whittaker, S (eds), French Civil Liability in Comparative Perspective (Hart Publishing 2019) 329–52.Google Scholar
Cardi, W J, Penfield, R D and Yoon, A H, “Does Tort Law Deter Individuals? A Behavioral Science Study” (2012) 9 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsmith, K M, “The Roles of Retribution and Utility in Determining Punishment” (2006) 42 Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsmith, K M and Darley, J M, “Psychological Aspects of Retributive Justice” (2008) 40 Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsmith, K M, Darley, J M and Robinson, P H, “Why Do We Punish? Deterrence and Just Deserts as Motives for Punishment” (2002) 83 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chamallas, M and Wriggins, J, The Measure of Injury: Race, Gender, and Tort Law (New York University Press 2010).Google Scholar
Chapman, B and Trebilcock, M, “Punitive Damages: Divergence in Search of a Rationale” (1989) 40 Alabama Law Review 741.Google Scholar
Cherry, M and Flanagan, O (eds), The Moral Psychology of Anger (Rowan and Littlefield International 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R, “The Problem of Social Cost” (1960) 3 Journal of Law and Economics 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colby, T B, “Clearing the Smoke from Phillips Morris v. Williams: The Past, Present and Future of Punitive Damages” (2008) 118 Yale Law Journal 392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colby, T B, “Beyond the Multiple Punishment Problem: Punitive Damages as Punishment for Individual, Private Wrongs (2003) 87 Minnesota Law Review 583.Google Scholar
Cooter, R D, “Expressive Law and Economics” (1998) 27 Journal of Legal Studies 585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooter, R D, “Punitive Damages, Social Norms, and Economic Analysis” (1997) 60 Law and Contemporary Problems 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooter, R D, “Punitive Damages for Deterrence: When and How Much?” (1989) 40 Alabama Law Review 1143.Google Scholar
Cooter, R D, “Economic Analysis of Punitive Damages” (1982) 56 Southern California Law Review 79.Google Scholar
Cooter, R D and Sugarman, S D, “A Regulated Market in Unmatured Tort Claims: Tort Reform by Contract,” in Olson, W (ed), New Directions in Liability Law (Academy of Political Science in conjunction with the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research 1988) 174–85.Google Scholar
Cooter, R D and Porat, A, Getting Incentives Right: Improving Torts, Contracts, and Restitution (Princeton University Press 2014).Google Scholar
Cooter, R D and Rubinfeld, D L, “Economic Analysis of Legal Disputes and Their Resolution” (1987) 27 Journal of Economic Literature 1067.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L and Tooby, J, “Cognitive Adaptations for Social Exchange,” in Barkow, J H, Cosmides, L and Tooby, J (eds), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture (Oxford University Press 1992) 163–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craswell, R, “Deterrence and Damages: The Multiplier Principle and Its Alternatives” (1999) 97 Michigan Law Review 2185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croley, S P and Hanson, J D, “Rescuing the Revolution: The Revived Case for Enterprise Liability” (1993) 91 Michigan Law Review 683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagan, H, “Pluralism and Perfectionism in Private Law” (2012) 112 Columbia Law Review 1409.Google Scholar
Dagan, H and Zipursky, B C, “Introduction: The Distinction between Private Law and Public Law,” in Dagan, H and Zipursky, B C (eds), Research Handbook on Private Law Theory (Edward Elgar 2020) 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darley, J M, “Citizens’ Sense of Justice and the Legal System” (2001) 10(1) Current Directions in Psychological Science 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darley, J M and Pittman, T S, “The Psychology of Compensatory and Retributive Justice” (2003) 7 Personality and Social Psychology Review 324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwall, S, Honor, History and Relationship. Essays in Second-Personal Ethics II (Oxford University Press 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, S, “Bipolar Obligation,” in Shafer-Landau, R (ed), Oxford Studies in Metaethics (Oxford University Press 2012) 332–57.Google Scholar
Darwall, S and Darwall, J, “Civil Recourse as Mutual Accountability” (2011) 39 Florida State University Law Review 17.Google Scholar
Deci, E L, Koestner, R M and Ryan, R A, “Meta-Analytic Review of Experiments Examining the Effect of Extrinsic Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation” (1999) 125 Psychological Bulletin 627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Jong, E R, “Tort Law and Judicial Risk Regulation: Bipolar and Multipolar Risk Reasoning in Light of Tort Law’s Regulatory Effects” (2018) 9 European Journal of Risk Regulation 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Olmo, P, “Punitive Damages in Spain,” in Koziol, H and Wilcox, V (eds), Punitive Damages: Common Law and Civil Law Perspectives (Springer 2009) 137–54.Google Scholar
De Sousa, R, “From the Rationality of Emotion,” in Solomon, R C (ed), What is an Emotion? Classic and Contemporary Readings (Oxford University Press 2003) 248–57.Google Scholar
Dheu, O and De Bruyne, J, “Artificial Intelligence and Tort Law: A ‘Multi-faceted’ Reality” (2023) 2–3 European Review of Private Law 261.Google Scholar
Diamantis, M E, “Erasing the Victims of Corporate Crime” (August 4, 2023) Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4531052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbs, D B, Dobbs Law of Remedies: Damages, Equity, Restitution (2nd ed.) (West Publishing 1993).Google Scholar
Donahue, N and Witt, J F, “Tort as Private Administration” (2020) 105 Cornell Law Review 1093.Google Scholar
Drutman, L, The Business of America is Lobbying: How Corporations Became Politicized and Politics Became More Corporate (Oxford University Press 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R A, “Torts, Crimes and Vindication: Whose Wrong Is It?” in Dyson, M (ed), Unravelling Tort and Crime (Cambridge University Press 2014) 146–73.Google Scholar
Duff, R A, “Repairing Harms and Answering for Wrongs,” in Oberdiek, J (ed), Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford University Press 2014) 212–29.Google Scholar
Dyson, M, “Tortious Apples and Criminal Oranges,” in Dyson, M (ed), Comparing Tort and Crime: Learning from Across and Within Legal Systems (Cambridge University Press 2015) 416–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, J, “In Defence of Exemplary Damages,” in Rickett, C E F (ed), Justifying Private Law Remedies (Hart Publishing 2008) 225–48.Google Scholar
Edelman, J, Colton, S and Varuhas, J (eds), McGregor on Damages (20th ed.) (Sweet & Maxwell 2017).Google Scholar
Eisenberg, T, Hannaford, P L, Heise, M, LaFountain, N, Ostrom, B, Wells, M T and Munsterman, G T, “Judges, Juries and Punitive Damages: Empirical Analyses Using the Civil Justice Survey of State Courts 1992, 1996 and 2001 Data” (2006) 3 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, T and Engel, C, “Assuring Civil Damages Adequately Deter: A Public Good Experiment” (2014) 11 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, T, Rachlinski, J J and Wells, M T, “Reconciling Experimental Incoherence with Real-World Coherence in Punitive Damages” (2002) 54 Stanford Law Review 1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, D, “Fairness and Efficiency in the Law of Punitive Damages” (1982) 56 Southern California Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Emerson, B, The Public’s Law: Origins and Architecture of Progressive Democracy (Oxford University Press 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Encarnacion, E, “Resilience, Retribution, and Punitive Damages” (2022) 100 Texas Law Review 1025.Google Scholar
Engel, D, The Myth of the Litigious Society: Why We Don’t Sue (University of Chicago Press 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, D, “The Oven Bird’s Song: Insiders, Outsiders and Personal Injuries in an American Community” (1984) 18 Law and Society Review 551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, N F and Rabin, R L, “Pursuing Public Health through Litigation: Lessons from Tobacco and Opioids” (2021) 73 Stanford Law Review 285.Google Scholar
Essert, C, “Thinking Like a Private Lawyer” (2018) 68 University of Toronto Law Journal 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairgrieve, D and Goldberg, R, Product Liability (3rd ed.) (Oxford University Press 2020).Google Scholar
Fairgrieve, D, Howells, G, Møgelvang-Hansen, P, Straetmans, G, Verhoeven, D, Machnikowski, P, Janssen, A and Schulze, R, “Product Liability Directive,” in Machnikowski, P (ed), European Product Liability-An Analysis of the State of the Art in the Era of New Technologies (Intersentia 2017) 17–108.Google Scholar
Feigenson, N R, “Can Tort Juries Punish Competently?” (2003) 78 Chicago-Kent Law Review 239.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J, “The Classic Debate,” in Feinberg, J and Coleman, J (eds), Philosophy of Law (6th ed.) (Wadsworth Publishing 1999) 799–803.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J, Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility (Princeton University Press 1970).Google Scholar
Feinman, J M, “Unmaking and Remaking Tort Law” (2005) 5 Journal of High Technology Law 61.Google Scholar
Feldman, Y and Lobel, O, “The Incentives Matrix: The Comparative Effectiveness of Rewards, Liabilities, Duties, and Protections for Reporting Illegality” (2010) 88 Texas Law Review 1151.Google Scholar
Feldman, Y and Teichman, D, “Are All ‘Legal Dollars’ Created Equal?” (2008) 102 Northwestern University Law Review 223.Google Scholar
Feldthusen, B, “Punitive Damages: Hard Choices and High Stakes” (1998) 1998(4) New Zealand Law Review 741.Google Scholar
Fischer, K W and Tangney, J P, “Self-Conscious Emotions and the Affect Revolution: Framework and Overview,” in Tangney, J P and Fischer, K W (eds), Self-Conscious Emotions: The Psychology of Shame, Guilt, Embarrassment, and Pride (Guilford Press 1995) 3–22.Google Scholar
Fischhoff, B, Slovic, P and Lichtenstein, S, “Weighting the Risks: Which Risks Are Acceptable?” in Slovic, P (ed), The Perception of Risk (Taylor & Francis 2000) 126–42.Google Scholar
Fiske, A P and Tetlock, P E, “Taboo Trade-Offs: Reactions to Transactions that Transgress the Spheres of Justice” (1997) 18 Political Psychology 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, G P, “The Place of Victims in the Theory of Retribution” (1999) 3 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabbay, Z, “Justifying Restorative Justice: A theoretical Justification for the Use of Restorative Justice Practices” (2005) 2 Journal of Dispute Resolution 349.Google Scholar
Galanter, M and Luban, D, “Poetic Justice: Punitive Damages and Legal Pluralism” (1993) 42 American University Law Review 1393.Google Scholar
Gamonal Contreras, S and Pino Emhart, A, “The Role of Human Dignity in Private Law: An Interpretation from the Concept of Dignity as Status” (2022) 43 Revista de Derecho Privado 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García Matamoros, L V and Herrera Lozano, M C, “El Concepto de los Daños Punitivos o Punitive Damages” (2003) 5(1) Revista Estudios Socio-Jurídicos 211.Google Scholar
Gardner, J, “What Is Tort Law For? Part I. The Place of Corrective Justice” (2011) 30 Law and Philosophy 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, J, “Torts and Other Wrongs” (2011) 39 Florida State University Law Review 43.Google Scholar
Gardner, J, “Crime: In Proportion and Perspective,” in Ashworth, A and Wasik, M (eds), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory (Oxford University Press 1998) 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geistfeld, M A, “Strict Products Liability 2.0: The Triumph of Judicial Reasoning Over Mainstream Tort Theory” (2021) 14(2) Journal of Tort Law 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geistfeld, M A, “Punitive Damages, Retribution, and Due Process” (2008) 81 California Law Review 263.Google Scholar
Gerber, M M and Jackson, J, “Retribution as Revenge and Retribution as Just Deserts” (2013) 26(1) Social Justice Research 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, G, “Moral Intuition=Fast and Frugal Heuristics,” in Sinnott-Armstrong, W (ed), Moral Psychology: Vol. 2. The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Diversity (MIT Press 2008) 1–26.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G and Todd, P M, “Fast and Frugal Heuristics: The Adaptive Toolbox,” in Stich, S (ed), Simple Heuristics that Make us Smart (Oxford University Press 1999) 3–34.Google Scholar
Gilles, M, “‘A Force Created’: The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Politics of Corporate Immunity” (2023) 72 DePaul Law Review 139.Google Scholar
Gilles, S G, “On Determining Negligence: Hand Formula Balancing, the Reasonable Person Standard, and the Jury” (2001) 45 Vanderbilt Law Review 813.Google Scholar
Gilliker, P, Vicarious Liability in Tort: A Comparative Perspective (Cambridge University Press 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gluck, A R, Burch, E C and Zimmerman, A S, “Against Bankruptcy: Public Litigation Values versus the Endless Quest for Global Peace in Mass Litigation” (2024) 133 Yale Law Forum 525.Google Scholar
Gneezy, U and Rustichini, A, “A Fine is a Price” (2000) 29 Journal of Legal Studies 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golash, D, The Case Against Punishment: Retribution, Crime Prevention, and the Law (New York University Press 2005).Google Scholar
Goldberg, J C P and Zipursky, B C, Recognizing Wrongs (Harvard University Press 2020).Google Scholar
Goldberg, J C P and Zipursky, B C, “The Fraud-on-the-Market Tort” (2013) 66 Vanderbilt Law Review 1755.Google Scholar
Goldberg, J C P and Zipursky, B C, “Civil Recourse Revisited” (2011) 39 Florida State University Law Review 273.Google Scholar
Gordon, R M, The Structure of Emotions: Investigations in Cognitive Philosophy (Cambridge University Press 1987).Google Scholar
Goudkamp, J, “Exemplary Damages,” in Virgo, G and Worthington, S (eds), Commercial Remedies: Resolving Controversies (Cambridge University Press 2017) 318–40.Google Scholar
Goudkamp, J and Courtney, W, “Introduction,” in Bant, E, Courtney, W, Goudkamp, J and Paterson, J M (eds), Punishment and Private Law (Hart Publishing 2021) 3–32.Google Scholar
Goudkamp, J and Katsampouka, E, “Punitive Damages: Ten Misconceptions,” in Bant, E, Courtney, W, Goudkamp, J and Paterson, J M (eds), Punishment and Private Law (Hart Publishing 2021) 187–224.Google Scholar
Goudkamp, J and Katsampouka, E, “Punitive Damages and the Place of Punishment in Private Law” (2021) 84(6) Modern Law Review 1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudkamp, J and Katsampouka, E, “Form and Substance in the Law of Punitive Damages,” in Robertson, A and Goudkamp, J (eds), Form and Substance in the Law of Obligations (Hart Publishing 2019) 331–52.Google Scholar
Goudkamp, J and Katsampouka, E, “An Empirical Study of Punitive Damages” (2018) 38 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudkamp, J and Nolan, D, Winfield & Jolowicz on Tort (20th ed.) (Sweet & Maxwell 2020).Google Scholar
Greco, C, “The Poly Implant Prothèse Breast Prostheses Scandal: Embodied Risk and Social Suffering” (2015) 147 Social Science and Medicine 150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, E, Coon, D and Bornstein, B H, “The Effects of Limiting Punitive Damages Awards” (2001) 25(3) Law and Human Behavior 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gromet, D M, “Psychological Perspectives on the Place of Restorative Justice in Criminal Justice Systems,” in Oswald, M E, Bieneck, S and Hupfeld-Heinemann, J (eds), Social Psychology of Punishment of Crime (Wiley-Blackwell 2009) 39–54.Google Scholar
Guttel, E, Harel, A and Lavie, S, “Torts for Nonvictims: The Case for Third-Party Litigation” (2018) 2018(3) University of Illinois Law Review 1049.Google Scholar
Hacker, P, “The European AI Liability Directives – Critique of a Half-Hearted Approach and Lessons for the Future” (2023) 51 Computer Law and Security Review 105871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadfield, G K, “Framing the Choice between Cash and the Courthouse: Experiences with the 9/11 Compensation Fund” (2008) 42 Law and Society Review 645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammesfahr, R W and Nugent, L S, Punitive Damages: A State-by-State Guide to Law and Practice (Thomson West 2012).Google Scholar
Hampton, J, “Correcting Harms versus Righting Wrongs: The Goal of Retribution” (1992) 39 University of California Law Review 1659.Google Scholar
Hampton, J, “An Expressive Theory of Retribution,” in Cragg, W (ed), Retributivism and Its Critics (Franz Steiner Verlag Wiesbaden GmbH 1992) 1–25.Google Scholar
Hampton, J, “A New Theory of Retribution,” in Frey, R G and Morris, C W (eds), Liability and Responsibility (Cambridge University Press 1991) 377–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, J, “The Retributive Idea,” in Murphy, J G and Hampton, J (eds), Forgiveness and Mercy (Cambridge University Press 1988) 111–61.Google Scholar
Hampton, J, “Forgiveness, Resentment and Hatred,” in Murphy, J G and Hampton, J (eds), Forgiveness and Mercy (Cambridge University Press 1988) 35–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, N, “Say What? A Critique of Expressive Retributivism” (2008) 27 Law and Philosophy 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hans, V P, Business on Trial: The Civil Jury and Corporate Responsibility (Yale University Press 2000).Google Scholar
Hanson, J D, “Introduction: Ideology, Psychology, and Law,” in Hanson, J (ed), Ideology, Psychology, and Law (Oxford University Press 2012) 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, J D and Kysar, D A, “Taking Behavioralism Seriously: The Problem of Market Manipulation” (1999) 74 New York University Law Review 630.Google Scholar
Hanson, J D and Kysar, D A, “Taking Behavioralism Seriously: Some Evidence of Market Manipulation” (1999) 112 Harvard Law Review 1420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanson, J D and Kysar, D A, “Taking Behavioralism Seriously: A Response to Market Manipulation” (2000) 6 Roger Williams University Law Review 259.Google Scholar
Hanson, J D and Logue, K D, “The Costs of Cigarettes: The Economic Case for Ex Post Incentive-Based Regulation” (1998) 107 Yale Law Journal 1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, J D and Yosifon, D, “The Situational Character: A Critical Realist Perspective on the Human Animal” (2004) 93 Georgetown Law Journal 1.Google Scholar
Harel, A, “Public and Private Law,” in Dubber, M D and Hörnle, T (eds), The Oxford Handbook on Criminal Law (Oxford University Press 2014) 1040–63.Google Scholar
Hart, H L A, Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law (2nd ed.) (Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastie, R and Viscusi, W K, “What Juries Can’t Do Well: The Jury’s Performance as a Risk Manager” (1998) 40 Arizona Law Review 901.Google Scholar
Hazard, G C (Jr.), “The Futures Problem” (2000) 148 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedley, S, “The Rise and Fall of Private Law Theory” (2018) 134 Law Quarterly Review 214.Google Scholar
Hedley, S, “Corrective Justice – An Idea Whose Time Has Gone?” in Del Mar, M and Lobban, M (eds), Law in Theory and History: New Essays on a Neglected Dialogue (Hart Publishing 2016) 305–26.Google Scholar
Hershovitz, S, “Treating Wrongs as Wrongs: An Expressive Argument for Tort Law” (2017) 10(2) Journal of Tort Law 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershovitz, S, “Tort as a Substitute for Revenge,” in Oberdiek, J (ed), Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Torts (Oxford University Press 2014) 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershovitz, S, “Corrective Justice for Civil Recourse Theorists” (2011) 39 Florida State University Law Review 107.Google Scholar
Herstein, O, “How Tort Law Empowers” (2015) 65 University of Toronto Law Journal 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hieronymi, P, “Articulating an Uncompromising Forgiveness” (2001) 62 Philosophy Phenomenological Research 529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, D A and O’Shea, M P, “Can Law and Economics Be Both Practical and Principled?” (2002) 53 Alabama Law Review 335.Google Scholar
Horwitz, M J, “The History of the Public/Private Distinction” (1982) 130 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howells, G, “Product Liability – A History of Harmonisation,” in Fairgrieve, D (ed), Product Liability in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge University Press 2005) 202–18.Google Scholar
Howells, G, “The Relationship between Product Liability and Product Safety – Understanding a Necessary Element in European Product Liability through a Comparison with the U.S. Position” (2000) 39 Washburn Law Journal 305.Google Scholar
Howells, G and Owen, D G, “Products Liability in America and Europe,” in Howells, G, Ramsay, I and Wilhelmsson, T (eds), Handbook of Research on International Consumer Law (2nd ed.) (Edward Elgar 2018).Google Scholar
Howells, G, Twigg-Flesner, C and Wilhelmsson, T, Rethinking EU Consumer Law (Routledge 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, P H, “Diverse Conceptions of Emotions in Risk Regulation” (2008) 156 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 435.Google Scholar
Husak, D, “Retributivism and Over-Punishment” (2022) 41 Law and Philosophy 169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Husak, D, “Why Legal Philosophers (Including Retributivists) Should be Less Resistant to Risk-Based Sentencing,” in de Keijser, J W, Roberts, J V and Ryberg, J (eds), Predictive Sentencing: Normative and Empirical Perspectives (Hart Publishing 2019) 33–50.Google Scholar
Husak, D, “Kinds of Punishment,” in Hurd, H M (ed), Moral Perplexities and Legal Puzzles: The Work of Larry Alexander (Cambridge University Press 2018) 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, D, “Does the State Have a Monopoly to Punish Crime?” in Flanders, C and Hoskins, Z (eds), The New Philosophy of Criminal Law (Rowman and Littlefield 2016) 95–110.Google Scholar
Husak, D, Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal Law (Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar
Husak, D, “Strict Liability, Justice, and Proportionality,” in Simester, A P (ed), Appraising Strict Liability (Oxford University Press 2005) 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hylton, K N, “A Theory of Wealth and Punitive Damages” (2008) 17 Widener Law Journal 927.Google Scholar
Hylton, K N, “Punitive Damages and the Economic Theory of Penalties” (1998) 87 Georgetown Law Journal 421.Google Scholar
Hylton, K L and Miceli, T J, “Should Tort Damages be Multiplied?” (2005) 21 Journal of Law Economics & Organization 388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingber, S, “Rethinking Intangible Injuries: A Focus on Remedy” (1985) 73 California Law Review 772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, N and Rademacher, L, “Punitive Damages in Germany,” in Koziol, H and Wilcox, V (eds), Punitive Damages: Common Law and Civil Law Perspectives (Springer 2009) 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Javela, J J, Mercadillo, R E and Ramírez, J M, “Anger and Associated Experiences of Sadness, Fear, Valence, Arousal, and Dominance Evoked by Visual Scenes” (2008) 103 Psychological Review 663.Google ScholarPubMed
Jolls, C, Sunstein, C R and Thaler, R, “A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics” (1998) 50 Stanford Law Review 1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, D M, “Two Conceptions of Emotion in Risk Regulation” (2008) 156 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 741.Google Scholar
Kahan, D M and Braman, D, “More Statistics, Less Persuasion: A Cultural Theory of Gun-Risk Perceptions” (2003) 151 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, D M, “Trust, Collective Action, and Law” (2001) 81 Boston University Law Review 333.Google Scholar
Kahan, D M, “Punishment Incommensurability” (1998) 1 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, D M, “What Do Alternative Sanctions Mean?” (1996) 63 University of Chicago Law Review 591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, P W, The Cultural Study of Law: Reconstructing Legal Scholarship (The University of Chicago Press 1999).Google Scholar
Kahneman, D and Frederick, S, “Representativeness Revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgment,” in Gilovich, T, Griffin, D and Kahneman, D (eds), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (Cambridge University Press 2002) 49–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D, Sibony, O and Sunstein, C R, Noise. A Flaw in Human Judgment (William Collins 2021).Google Scholar
Khaneman, D, Schkade, D and Sunstein, C R, “Shared Outrage and Erratic Awards: The Psychology of Punitive Damages” (1998) 16 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D and Tversky, A, “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk” (1979) 47 Econometrica 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D, Ritov, I and Schkade, D, “Economic Preferences of Attitude Expressions? An Analysis of Dollar Responses to Public Issues” (1999) 19 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaminski, M E, “Regulating the Risks of AI” (2023) 103 Boston University Law Review 1347.Google Scholar
Keating, G C, Reasonableness and Risk. Right and Responsibility in the Law of Torts (Oxford University Press 2023).Google Scholar
Keating, G C, “Is Tort Law ‘Private’?” in Oberdiek, J and Miller, P B (eds), Civil Wrongs and Justice in Private Law (Oxford University Press 2020) 351–72.Google Scholar
Keating, G C, “Is Cost-Benefit Analysis the Only Game in Town?” (2018) 91 Southern California Law Review 195.Google Scholar
Keating, G C, “Is the Role of Tort to Repair Wrongful Losses?” in Nolan, D and Robertson, A (eds), Rights and Private Law (Hart Publishing 2012) 367–406.Google Scholar
Keating, G C, “Pressing Precaution Beyond the Point of Cost-Justification” (2003) 56 Vanderbilt Law Review 653.Google Scholar
Keeton, W P, Dobbs, D B, Keeton, R E and Owen, D G, Prosser and Keeton on Torts (5th ed.) (West Publishing, 1984).Google Scholar
Kelman, M, “Moral Realism and the Heuristics Debate” (2013) 5 Journal of Legal Analysis 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D, “New Approaches to Comparative Law: Comparativism and International Governance” (1997) 1997 Utah Law Review 545.Google Scholar
Kessler, F, Contracts of Adhesion – Some Thoughts about Freedom of Contract (1943) 43 Columbia Law Review 629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, M, Freiberg, A M, Batagol, B M and Hyams, R L, Non-Adversarial Justice (2nd ed.) (Federation Press 2014).Google Scholar
Kircher, J J and Wiseman, C M, Punitive Damages: Law and Practice (2nd ed., 2 vols) (Clark Boardman Callaghan, 2023).Google Scholar
Kleinig, J, “What Does Wrongdoing Deserve?” in Tonry, M (ed), Retributivism Has a Past: Has It a Future? (Oxford University Press 2011) 46–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, B A, “Punitive Damages in European Law,” in Koziol, H and Wilcox, V (eds), Punitive Damages: Common Law and Civil Law Perspectives (Springer 2009) 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koehler, J J and Gershoff, A D, “Betrayal Aversion is Reasonable” (2005) 28 Behavioral and Brain Sciences 556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koehler, J J and Gershoff, A D, “Betrayal Aversion: When Agents of Protection Become Agents of Harm” (2002) 90 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koening, T and Rustad, M, “His and Her Tort Reform: Gender Injustice in Disguise” (1995) 70 Washington Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Kolber, A J, “The Subjective Experience of Punishment” (2009) 109 Columbia Law Review 182.Google Scholar
Komesar, N, “Injuries and Institutions: Tort Reform, Tort Theory, and Beyond” (1990) 64 New York University Law Review 60.Google Scholar
Königs, P, “The Expressivist Account of Punishment, Retribution, and the Emotions” (2013) 16 Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korzec, R, “Dashing Consumer Hopes: Strict Products Liability and the Demise of the Consumer Expectations Test” (1997) 20 Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 227.Google Scholar
Kotler, M A, “Utility, Autonomy and Motive: A Descriptive Model of the Development of Tort Doctrine” (1990) 58 University of Cincinnati Law Review 1231.Google Scholar
Koziol, H, “Punitive Damages – A European Perspective” (2008) 68 Louisiana Law Review 751.Google Scholar
Kuenzler, A, “Third-Generation Competition Law” (2023) 11(1) Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuenzler, A, “Competition Law Enforcement on Digital Markets – Lessons from Recent EU Case Law” (2019) 7(2) Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuenzler, A, Restoring Consumer Sovereignty: How Markets Manipulate Us and What the Law Can Do About It (Oxford University Press 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, R, “Why Reparations?” in Oberdiek, J (ed), Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Torts (Oxford University Press 2014) 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kusch, M, “Towards a Political Philosophy of Risk: Experts and Publics in Deliberative Democracy,” in Lewens, T (ed), Risk: Philosophical Perspectives (Routledge 2007) 131–55.Google Scholar
Kysar, D A, “The Public Life of Private Law: Tort Law as a Risk Regulation Mechanism” (2018) 9(1) European Journal of Risk Regulation 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kysar, D A, Regulating From Nowhere: Environmental Law and the Search for Objectivity (Yale University Press 2010).Google Scholar
Kysar, D A, “The Expectations of Consumers” (2003) 103 Columbia Law Review 1700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kysar, D A, “Preferences for Processes: The Process/Product Distinction and the Regulation of Consumer Choice” (2003) 118 Harvard Law Review 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, S, “The Psychology of Condemnation: Underlying Emotions and Their Symbolic Expression in Condemning and Shaming” (2003) 68 Brooklyn Law Review 929.Google Scholar
Landes, W M and Posner, R A, The Economic Structure of Tort Law (Harvard University Press 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langbein, J, “The Disappearance of Civil Trial in the United States” (2012) 122 Yale Law Journal 522.Google Scholar
Latin, H, “‘Good’ Warnings, Bad Products, and Cognitive Limitations” (1994) 41 University of California at Los Angeles Law Review 1193.Google Scholar
Latin, H, “Activity Levels, Due Care, and Selective Realism in Economic Analysis of Tort Law” (1987) 39 Rutgers Law Review 487.Google Scholar
Laux, J, Wachter, S and Mittelstadt, B, “Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence and the European Union AI Act: On the Conflation of Trustworthiness and Acceptability of Risk” (2024) 18 Regulation & Governance 3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laycock, D, “The Death of the Irreparable Injury Rule” (1990) 103 Harvard Law Review 687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laycock, D and Hasen, R L, Modern American Remedies: Cases and Materials (5th ed.) (Aspen Publishing 2018).Google Scholar
Legrand, P, “The Impossibility of ‘Legal Transplants’” (1997) 4 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lens, J W, “Product Recalls: Why is Tort Law Deferring to Agency Inaction?” (2016) 90 St. John’s Law Review 329.Google Scholar
Lens, J W, “Justice Holme’s Bad Man and the Depleted Purposes of Punitive Damages” (2003) 101 Kentucky Law Journal 789.Google Scholar
Lerner, A M, “From Socrates to Damasio, from Langdell to Kandel: The Role of Emotion in Modern Legal Education,” in Maharg, P and Maughan, C (eds), Affect and Legal Education. Emotion in Learning and Teaching the Law (Routledge 2011) 148–73.Google Scholar
Lerner, J S, Goldberg, J H and Tetlock, P E, “Sober Second Thought: The Effects of Accountability, Anger, and Authoritarianism on Attributions of Responsibility” (1998) 24 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, M J, The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion (Springer 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessig, L, “The Regulation of Social Meaning” (1995) 62 University of Chicago Law Review 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ley, A J, “The Costs and Benefits of American Policy-Making Venues” (2014) 48 Law and Society Review 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liau, T, Standing in Private Law. Powers of Enforcement in the Law of Obligations and Trusts (Oxford University Press 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenstein, S, Slovic, P, Fischhoff, B, Layman, M and Combs, B, “Judged Frequency of Lethal Events” (1978) 4 Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 551.Google Scholar
Loth, M A, “The Civil Court as Risk Regulator: The Issue of Its Legitimacy” (2018) 9 European Journal of Risk Regulation 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, J C, “Punishment and Deterrence: A Comparative Study of Tort Liability for Punitive Damages under Non-Fault Compensation Legislation” (1983) 16 UC Davis Law Review 231.Google Scholar
Maher, F, “An Empirical Analysis of Exemplary Damages in Australia” (2019) 43 Melbourne University Law Review 694.Google Scholar
Manikis, M, “Conceptualizing the Victim in England and Wales and the United States within a Spectrum of Public and Private Interests” (2021) 41(1) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, K, “Punitive Civil Sanctions: The Middleground between Criminal and Civil Law” (1992) 101 Yale Law Journal 1795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchisio, E, “In Support of ‘No-Fault’ Civil Liability Rules for Artificial Intelligence” (2021) 54(1) SN Social Sciences 1.Google Scholar
Markel, D, “How Should Punitive Damages Work?” (2009) 157 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1383.Google Scholar
Markel, D, “Retributive Damages: A Theory of Punitive Damages as Intermediate Sanction” (2009) 94 Cornell Law Review 239.Google Scholar
Markel, D and Flanders, C, “Bentham on Stilts: The Bare Relevance of Subjectivity to Retributive Justice” (2010) 98 California Law Review 907.Google Scholar
Martínez Alles, M G, “Reducing Inequality in Consumer Transactions: The Significance of Aggravated Vulnerabilities,” in Davis, K E and Pargendler, M (eds), Legal Heterodoxy in the Global South (Cambridge University Press 2025) 77–111.Google Scholar
Martínez Alles, M G, “Punitive Damages in Argentina and Mexico: Rethinking the Scope of the Public Policy Exception,” in Vanleenhove, C and Meurkens, L (eds), The Recognition and Enforcement of Punitive Damages Judgments across the Globe: Insights from Various Continents (Eleven International Publishing 2023) 129–47.Google Scholar
Martínez Alles, M G, “La Dimensión Sancionadora del Derecho de Daños. Los Daños Punitivos,” in Papayannis, D M (ed), Manual de Responsabilidad Extracontractual (Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación de Mexico 2022) 601–47.Google Scholar
Martínez Alles, M G, “La Dimensión Retributiva del Derecho de Daños: La Perspectiva de la Víctima,” in García Amado, J A and Papayannis, D M (eds), Dañar, Incumplir y Reparar. Ensayos de Filosofía del Derecho Privado (Palestra 2020) 107–31.Google Scholar
Martínez Alles, M G, “Tort Remedies as Meaningful Responses to Wrongdoing,” in Oberdiek, J and Miller, P B (eds), Civil Wrongs and Justice in Private Law (Oxford University Press 2020) 231–52.Google Scholar
Martínez Alles, M G, “Punitive Damages: Reorienting the Debate in Civil Law Systems” (2019) 10(1) Journal of European Tort Law 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez Alles, M G, “Moral Outrage and Betrayal Aversion: The Psychology of Punitive Damages” (2018) 11 Journal of Tort Law 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez Alles, M G, “¿Para Qué Sirven los Daños Punitivos? Modelos de Sanción Privada, Sanción Social y Disuasión Óptima” (2012) 5 Revista de Responsabilidad Civil y Seguros 55.Google Scholar
Martínez Alles, M G and Nazareno, P, “Desafíos Constitucionales de los Daños Punitivos: Los Problemas del Ne Bis in Idem,” in Legarre, S, Grosman, L S, Rivera, J C (h) and Elías, J S (eds), Tratado de los Derechos Constitucionales (Abeledo Perrot 2014) 688–731.Google Scholar
Masur, J, Bronsteen, J and Buccafusco, C, “Retribution and the Experience of Punishment” (2010) 98 California Law Review 1463.Google Scholar
Matravers, M, “The Place of Proportionality in Penal Theory: Or Rethinking Thinking about Punishment,” in Tonry, M (ed), Of One-Eyed and Toothless Miscreants: Making the Punishment Fit the Crime? (Oxford University Press 2019) 76–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, N J, “Punitive Damages,” in Birks, P (ed), Wrongs and Remedies in the Twenty-First Century (Oxford University Press 1996) 175–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, D C, Greene, J and Worzella, C, Day Fines in American Courts: The Staten Island and Milwaukee Experiments (National Institute of Justice, Department of Justice 1992).Google Scholar
McGeer, V, “Civilizing Blame,” in Coates, D J and Tognazzini, N A (eds), Blame. Its Nature and Norms (Oxford University Press 2013) 162–88.Google Scholar
McMichael, B J and Viscusi, W K, “Bringing Predictability to the Chaos of Punitive Damages” (2022) 54 Arizona State Law Journal 471.Google Scholar
Mendlow, G S, “On the State’s Exclusive Right to Punish” (2022) 41 Law and Philosophy 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendlow, G S, “Is Tort Law a Form of Institutionalized Revenge?” (2011) 39 Florida State University Law Review 129.Google Scholar
Menyhárd, A, “Punitive Damages in Hungary,” in Koziol, H and Wilcox, V (eds), Punitive Damages: Common Law and Civil Law Perspectives (Springer 2009) 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, S E and Silbey, S S, “What Do Plaintiffs Want? Re-Examining the Concept of Dispute” (1984) 9 Justice System Journal 151.Google Scholar
Merryman, J H and Pérez-Perdomo, R, The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America (3rd ed.) (Stanford University Press 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meurkens, R C, Punitive Damages: The Civil Remedy in American Law, Lessons and Caveats for Continental Europe (Kluwer 2014).Google Scholar
Meurkens, L and Nordin, E (eds), The Power of Punitive Damages. Is Europe Missing Out? (Intersentia 2012).Google Scholar
Michaels, R, “The Functional Method of Comparative Law,” in Reimann, M and Zimmermann, R (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford University Press 2006) 339–82.Google Scholar
Michelon, C, “The Public Nature of Private Law?” (2020) 7 Latin American Legal Studies 231.Google Scholar
Micklitz, H W, “Risk, Tort and Liability,” in Grundmann, S, Micklitz, H and Renner, M (eds), New Private Law Theory: A Pluralistic Approach (Cambridge University Press 2021) 272–97.Google Scholar
Miller, D T and Vidmar, N, “The Social Psychology of Punishment Reactions,” in Lerner, M J and Lerner, S C (eds), The Justice Motive in Social Behavior (Springer 1981) 145–72.Google Scholar
Moore, M S, Placing Blame: A Theory of the Criminal Law (Oxford University Press 1997).Google Scholar
Moore, M S, “Victims and Retribution: A Reply to Professor Fletcher” (1999) 3 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mor, S, “The Meaning of Injury: A Disability Perspective,” in Bloom, A, Engel, D and McCann, M (eds), Injury and Injustice: The Cultural Politics of Harm and Redress (Cambridge University Press 2018) 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, F W, “The Evolution of Punitive Damages in Product Liability Litigation for Unprincipled Marketing Behavior” (1989) 8 Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, J, “Reflections on Reforming Punitive Damages in English Law,” in Meurkens, L and Nordin, E (eds), The Power of Punitive Damages. Is Europe Missing Out? (Intersentia 2012) 183–207.Google Scholar
Morgan, P, “Vicarious Punishment: Vicarious Liability for Exemplary Damages?” in Bant, E, Courtney, W, Goudkamp, J and Paterson, J M (eds), Punishment and Private Law (Hart Publishing 2021) 287–318.Google Scholar
Morris, C, “Punitive Damages in Tort Cases” (1931) 44 Harvard Law Review 1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulcahy, L and Teeder, W, “Are Litigants, Trials and Precedents Vanishing After All?” (2022) 85(2) Modern Law Review 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, J, “Anomalies in Tort Law: A Cause for Concern?” (2023) 86 Modern Law Review 872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, J, “The Nature and Domain of Aggravated Damages” (2010) 69 Cambridge Law Journal 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, J G, Getting Even: Forgiveness and Its Limits (Oxford University Press 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, J G, “Two Cheers for Vindictiveness” (2000) 2 Punishment and Society 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, J G, “Retributive Hatred: An Essay on Criminal Liability and the Emotions,” in Frey, R G and Morris, C W (eds), Liability and Responsibility (Cambridge University Press 1991) 351–76.Google Scholar
Murphy, J G, “Forgiveness and Resentment” (1982) 7 Midwest Studies in Philosophy 503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, J G and Hampton, J (eds), Forgiveness and Mercy (Cambridge University Press 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagareda, R A, Mass Torts in a World of Settlement (University of Chicago Press 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, D, “Against Strict Product Liability,” in Nolan, D (ed), Questions of Liability. Essays on the Law of Tort (Hart Publishing 2023) 392–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, D, “Tort and Public Law: Overlapping Categories?” (2019) 135 Law Quarterly Review 272.Google Scholar
Note, “The Assessment of Punitive Damages against an Entrepreneur for the Malicious Torts of His Employees” (1961) 70 Yale Law Journal 1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Note, “Exemplary Damages in the Law of Torts” (1957) 70 Harvard Law Review 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M C, Anger and Forgiveness: Resentment, Generosity, Justice (Oxford University Press 2016).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M C, Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame and the Law (Princeton University Press 2006).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M C, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions (Cambridge University Press 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oatley, K, Keltner, D and Jenkins, J M, Understanding Emotions (2nd ed.) (Wiley-Blackwell 2006).Google Scholar
Okimoto, T G and Tyler, T R, “Is Compensation Enough? Relational Concerns in Responding to Unintended Inequity” (2007) 10(3) Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otero Crespo, M, “Punitive Damages Under Spanish Law: A Subtle Recognition?,” in Meurkens, L and Nordin, E (eds), The Power of Punitive Damages. Is Europe Missing Out? (Intersentia 2012) 283–302.Google Scholar
Owen, D G, “Aggravating Punitive Damages” (2010) 158 University of Pennsylvania Law Review PENNumbra 181.Google Scholar
Owen, D G, “The Evolution of Products Liability Law” (2007) 26 The Review of Litigation 955.Google Scholar
Owen, D G, “Risk-Utility Balancing in Design Defect Cases” (1997) 30 University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 239.Google Scholar
Owen, D G, “Deterrence and Desert in Tort: A Comment” (1985) 73 California Law Review 665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, D G, “Civil Punishment and the Public Good” (1982) 56 Southern California Law Review 103.Google Scholar
Owen, D G, “Problems in Assessing Punitive Damages against Manufacturers of Defective Products” (1982) 49 University of Chicago Law Review 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, D G, “Punitive Damages in Products Liability Litigation” (1976) 74 Michigan Law Review 1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, D G and Davis, M J, Owen & Davis on Products Liability (4th ed.) (Thomson West 2014–2021).Google Scholar
Papayannis, D M, “The Morality of Compensation through Tort Law” (2023) 36(1) Ratio Juris 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penner, J, “Punishments and Penalties in Private Law, with Particular Reference to the Law Governing Fiduciaries” in Bant, E, Courtney, W, Goudkamp, J and Paterson, J M (eds), Punishment and Private Law (Hart Publishing 2021) 105–30.Google Scholar
Pereira Fredes, E, “Un Alegato a Favor de las Consideraciones Punitivas en el Derecho Privado” (2015) 7 Revista de Derecho Escuela de Postgrado 61.Google Scholar
Perry, R, “Income-Dependent Punitive Damages” (2018) 95 Washington University Law Review 835.Google Scholar
Perry, R, “The Role of Retributive Justice in the Common Law of Torts: A Descriptive Theory” (2006) 73 Tennessee Law Review 163.Google Scholar
Persad, G C, “Risk, Everyday Intuitions, and the Institutional Value of Tort Law” (2010) 62 Stanford Law Review 1445.Google Scholar
Persad, G C, “When, and How, Should Cognitive Bias Matter to Law” (2014) 32 Law and Inequality 31.Google Scholar
Peteffi da Silva, R and Pickersgill Walker, M, “Punitive Damages: United States Conceptualization of the Doctrine and Case Law Analysis of Santa Catarina Court of Appeals” (2016) 74 Seqüência (Florianópolis) 295.Google Scholar
Peterson, M A, Sarma, S and Shanley, M G, Punitive Damages: Empirical Findings (Institute for Civil Justice Rand 1987).Google Scholar
Pildes, R H and Anderson, E S, “Slinging Arrows at Democracy: Social Choice Theory, Value Pluralism, and Democratic Politics” (1990) 90 Columbia Law Review 2121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillsbury, S H, Emotional Justice: Moralizing the Passions of Criminal Punishment (1989) 74 Cornell Law Review 655.Google Scholar
Pino Emhart, A, “No Sólo Quieren Dinero: La Función Expresiva de la Responsabilidad Extracontractual,” in Barría Díaz, R, Ferrante, A and San Martín Neira, L C (eds), Presente y Futuro de la Responsabilidad Civil (Thomson Reuters 2017) 159–76.Google Scholar
Pizarro, R D, “Daños Punitivos,” in De Carlucci, A Kemelmajer (ed), Derecho de Daños: Libro en Homenaje al Prof. Félix Trigo Represas (La Rocca 1993) 287–337.Google Scholar
Polinsky, A M, “Are Punitive Damages Really Insignificant, Predictable, and Rational? A Comment on Eisenberg et al.,” (1997) 26 Journal of Legal Studies 663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, A M and Shavell, S, “The Uneasy Case for Product Liability” (2010) 123 Harvard Law Review 1437.Google Scholar
Polinsky, A M and Shavell, S, “Punitive Damages: An Economic Analysis” (1998) 111 Harvard Law Review 869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, R A, “Emotion Versus Emotionalism in Law,” in Bandes, S A (ed), The Passions of Law (New York University Press 2000) 309–29.Google Scholar
Priest, G, “The Invention of Enterprise Liability: A Critical History of the Intellectual Foundations of Modern Tort Law” (1985) 14 Journal of Legal Studies 461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, G, “The Best Evidence of the Effect of Products Liability Law on the Accident Rate: Reply” (1982) 91 Yale Law Journal 1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, G, “A Theory of the Consumer Product Warranty” (1981) 90 Yale Law Journal 1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radin, M J, “Compensation and Commensurability” (1993) 43 Duke Law Journal 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radzik, L, “Tort Processes and Relational Repair,” in Oberdiek, J (ed), Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Torts (Oxford University Press 2014) 231–48.Google Scholar
Raphael, D D and Macfie, A L (eds), The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith: The Theory of Moral Sentiments (Oxford University Press 1976).Google Scholar
Reed, A, “Exemplary Damages: A Persuasive Argument for their Retention as a Mechanism of Retributive Justice” (1996) 1996 Civil Justice Quarterly 130.Google Scholar
Reimann, M, “Liability for Defective Products at the Beginning of the Twenty-first Century: Emergence of a Worldwide Standard?” (2003) 51 American Journal of Comparative Law 751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Relis, T, Perceptions in Litigation and Mediation: Lawyers, Defendants, Plaintiffs, and Gendered Parties (Cambridge University Press 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnik, J, “The Functions of Publicity and of Privatization in Courts and their Replacements (from Jeremy Bentham to #MeToo and Google Spain),” in Hess, B and Harvey, A K (eds), Open Justice: The Role of Courts in a Democratic Society (Nomos 2019) 177–252.Google Scholar
Rice, D A, “Exemplary Damages in Private Consumer Actions” (1969) 55 Iowa Law Review 307.Google Scholar
Ripstein, A, “Civil Recourse and Separation of Wrongs and Remedies” (2011) 39 Florida State University Law Review 163.Google Scholar
Ripstein, A and Zipursky, B C, “Corrective Justice in an Age of Mass Torts,” in Postema, G J (ed), Philosophy and the Law of Torts (Cambridge University Press 2001) 214–49.Google Scholar
Robbennolt, J K and Hans, V P, The Psychology of Tort Law (New York University Press 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, A and Richardson, M, “Privacy, Punishment and Private Law,” in Bant, E, Courtney, W, Goudkamp, J and Paterson, J M (eds), Punishment and Private Law (Hart Publishing 2021) 83–104.Google Scholar
Robinette, C J, “Harmonizing Wrongs and Compensation” (2021) 80 Maryland Law Review 343.Google Scholar
Robinette, C J, “Party Autonomy in Tort Theory and Reform” (2013) 6 Journal of Tort Law 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinette, C J, “Two Roads Diverge for Civil Recourse Theory” (2013) 88 Indiana Law Journal 543.Google Scholar
Rosenvald, N, As Funções da Responsabilidade Civil: a Reparação e a Pena Civil (2nd ed.) (Atlas 2014).Google Scholar
Ross, E A, Sin and Society: An Analysis of Latter-Day Iniquity (1907) (Reprint) (Cornell University Library 2009).Google Scholar
Rousseau, D M, Sitkin, S B, Burt, R S and Camerer, C, “Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust” (1998) 23 Academy of Management Review 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowan, S, “Punishment and Private Law: Some Comparative Observations,” in Bant, E, Courtney, W, Goudkamp, J and Paterson, J M (eds), Punishment and Private Law (Hart Publishing 2021) 63–82.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, W B, “On What A ‘Private Attorney General Is – And Why It Matters’” (2004) 57 Vanderbilt Law Review 2129.Google Scholar
Rustad, M L, “Happy No More: Federalism Derailed by the Court that would be King of Punitive Damages” (2005) 64 Maryland Law Review 461.Google Scholar
Rustad, M L, “In Defense of Punitive Damages in Products Liability: Testing Tort Anecdotes with Empirical Data” (1992) 78 Iowa Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Rustad, M L and Koenig, T, “The Historical Continuity of Punitive Damages: Reforming the Tort Reformers” (1993) 42 The American University Law Review 1269.Google Scholar
Sage, N, “Relational Wrongs and Agency in Tort Theory” (2021) 41 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sant’Ambrogio, M and Staszewski, G, “Democratizing Rule Development” (2021) 98 Washington University Law Review 793.Google Scholar
Scarso, A P, “Punitive Damages in Italy,” in Koziol, H and Wilcox, V (eds), Punitive Damages: Common Law and Civil Law Perspectives (Springer 2009) 103–13.Google Scholar
Schroeder, E T, “Note. A Tort by Any Other Name? In Search of the Distinction between Regulation through Litigation and Conventional Tort Law” (2005) 83 Texas Law Review 897.Google Scholar
Schwartz, A, “Proposals for Products Liability Reform: A Theoretical Synthesis” (1998) 97 Yale Law Journal 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B, “Crowding Out Morality: How the Ideology of Self-Interest Can Be Self-Fulfilling,” in Hanson, J (ed), Ideology, Psychology, and Law (Oxford University Press 2012) 160–84.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G T, “Empiricism and Tort Law” (2002) 4 University of Illinois Law Review 1067.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G T, “Mixed Theories of Tort Law: Affirming Both Deterrence and Corrective Justice” (1997) 75 Texas Law Review 1801.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G T, “Reality in the Economic Analysis of Tort Law: Does Tort Law Really Deter?” (1994) 42 University of California Law Review 377.Google Scholar
Schwartz, V E and Appel, C E, “Exporting United States Tort Law: The Importance of Authenticity, Necessity, and Learning from Our Mistakes” (2011) 38 Pepperdine Law Review 2.Google Scholar
Schwartz, V E and Lorber, L, “Twisting the Purpose of Pain and Suffering Awards: Turning Compensation into ‘Punishment’” (2002) 54 Southern California Law Review 47.Google Scholar
Sebok, A J, “Normative Theories of Punitive Damages: The Case of Deterrence,” in Oberdiek, J (ed), Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Torts (Oxford University Press 2014) 312–28.Google Scholar
Sebok, A J, “What Did Punitive Damages Do? Why Misunderstanding the History of Punitive Damages Matters Today” (2003) 78 Chicago Kent Law Review 163.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, T, A Treatise on the Measure of Damages (7th ed.) (Baker, Voorhis & Co. 1880).Google Scholar
Shapiro, M A, “The Indignities of Civil Litigation” (2020) 100 Boston University Law Review 501.Google Scholar
Shapo, M S, Products Liability and the Search for Justice (Carolina Academic Press 1993).Google Scholar
Shapo, M S, The Duty to Act – Tort Law, Power, & Public Policy (University of Texas Press 1978).Google Scholar
Sharkey, C M, “Punitive Damages Transformed into Societal Damages,” in Bant, E, Courtney, W, Goudkamp, J and Paterson, J M (eds), Punishment and Private Law (Hart Publishing 2021) 155–86.Google Scholar
Sharkey, C M, “Economic Analysis of Punitive Damages: Theory, Empirics, and Doctrine,” in Arlen, J (ed), Research Handbook on the Economics of Torts (Edward Elgar 2013) 486–511.Google Scholar
Sharkey, C M, “Crossing the Punitive-Compensatory Divide,” in Bornstein, B H, Wiener, R L, Schopp, R and Willborn, S L (eds), Civil Juries and Civil Justice: Psychological & Legal Perspectives (Springer 2008) 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharkey, C M, “Revisiting the Noninsurable Costs of Accidents” (2005) 64 Maryland Law Review 409.Google Scholar
Sharkey, C M, “Punitive Damages as Societal Damages” (2003) 113 Yale Law Journal 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavell, S, “Strict Liability versus Negligence” (1980) 9 Journal of Legal Studies 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, E, “Comments on Stephen Smith’s Duties, Liabilities and Damages” (2012) 125 Harvard Law Review Forum 164.Google Scholar
Sherwin, E, “Interpreting Tort Law” (2011) 39 Florida State University Law Review 227.Google Scholar
Shiffrin, S V, “Democratic Law and the Erosion of Common Law,” in Shiffrin, S V and Ginsborg, H (eds), Democratic Law (Oxford University Press 2021) 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuman, D W, “The Psychology of Compensation in Tort Law” (1994) 43 Kansas Law Review 39.Google Scholar
Silva, L, “Is Anger a Hostile Emotion?” (2024) 15 Review of Philosophy and Psychology 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinanis, N, “Aggravation in Tort before 1763” (2022) 43 Journal of Legal History 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, K W, “Response, Retributivists Need Not and Should Not Endorse the Subjectivist Account of Punishment” (2009) 109 Columbia Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Slovic, P, “Perception of Risk,” in Slovic, P (ed), The Perception of Risk (Taylor and Francis 2000) 219–31.Google Scholar
Slovic, P, “Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk-Assessment Battlefield” (1999) 19 Risk Analysis 689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, S A, Rights, Wrongs, and Injustices: The Structure of Remedial Law (Oxford University Press 2020).Google Scholar
Solomon, J M, “Equal Accountability through Tort Law” (2009) 103 Northwestern University Law Review 1765.Google Scholar
Solomon, R C, “From Emotions and Choice,” in Solomon, R C (ed), What Is an Emotion? Classic and Contemporary Readings (Oxford University Press 2003) 224–35.Google Scholar
Solomon, R C, “Justice v. Vengeance: On Law and the Satisfaction of Emotion,” in Bandes, S A (ed), The Passions of Law (New York University Press 2000) 121–48.Google Scholar
Solomon, R C, The Passions: Emotions and the Meaning of Life (Hackett Publishing 1993).Google Scholar
Spring, V L, Cameron, C D and Cikara, M, “The Upside of Outrage” (2018) 22(12) Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srinivasan, A, “The Aptness of Anger” (2018) 26(2) Journal of Political Philosophy 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapleton, J, “Products Liability in the United Kingdom: The Myths of Reform” (1999) 34 Texas International Law Journal 45.Google Scholar
Stark, F, “Tort Law, Expression, and Duplicative Wrongs,” in Oberdiek, J and Miller, P B (eds), Civil Wrongs and Justice in Private Law (Oxford University Press 2020) 441–62.Google Scholar
Steel, S, “Deterrence in Private Law,” in Psarras, H and Steel, S (eds), Private Law and Practical Reason: Essays on John Gardner’s Private Law Theory (Oxford University Press 2023) 123–42.Google Scholar
Steel, S, “On the Moral Necessity of Tort Law: The Fairness Argument” (2021) 41 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, J, “Satisfying Claims? Money, Tort, and ‘Consumer Society’” (2011) 20 Social & Legal Studies 516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, R, “Private Law and the Form of Reasons,” in Robertson, A and Goudkamp, J (eds), Form and Substance in the Law of Obligations (Hart Publishing 2019) 119–48.Google Scholar
Strawson, P F, “Freedom and Resentment,” in Watson, G (ed), Free Will (Oxford University Press 1982) 59–84.Google Scholar
Sugarman, S D, “Peter Cane on Torts,” in Goudkamp, J, Lunney, M and McDonald, L (eds), Taking Law Seriously: Essays in Honour of Peter Cane (Hart Publishing 2022) 73–92.Google Scholar
Sugarman, S D, “Doing Away with Tort Law” (1985) 73 California Law Review 555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C R, “Moral Heuristics and Risk,” in Lewens, T (ed), Risk: Philosophical Perspectives (Routledge 2007) 156–70.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C R, “Moral Heuristics” (2005) 28(4) Behavioral and Brain Sciences 531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sunstein, C R, “On the Psychology of Punishment” (2004) 11 Supreme Court Economic Review 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C R, Risk and Reason: Safety, Law, and the Environment (Cambridge University Press 2002).Google Scholar
Sunstein, C R, “Cognition and Cost-Benefit Analysis” (2000) 29 Journal of Legal Studies 1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C R, On the Expressive Function of Law (1996) 144 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C R, Hastie, R, Payne, J W, Schkade, D A and Viscusi, W K, Punitive Damages: How Juries Decide (The University of Chicago Press 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C R, Kahneman, D and Schkade, D, “Assessing Punitive Damages (with Notes on Cognition and Valuation in Law)” (1998) 107 Yale Law Journal 2071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C R, Schakade, D A and Kahneman, D, “Do People Want Optimal Deterrence?” (2000) 29 Journal of Legal Studies 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C R and Shih, J M, “Damages in Sexual Harassment Cases,” in MacKinnon, C A and Siegel, R B (eds), Directions in Sexual Harassment Law (Yale University Press 2004) 324–44.Google Scholar
Tadros, V, The Ends of Harm: The Moral Foundations of Criminal Law (Oxford University Press 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talesh, S A, “The Privatization of Public Legal Rights: How Manufacturers Construct the Meaning of Consumer Law” (2009) 43(3) Law and Society Review 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taliadoros, J, “The Roots of Punitive Damages at Common Law: A Longer History” (2016) 64 Cleveland State Law Review 251.Google Scholar
Tenbrunsel, A E and Messick, D M, “Sanctioning Systems, Decision Frames, and Cooperation” (1999) 44 Administrative Science Quarterly 684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tettenborn, A, “Punitive Damages – A View from England” (2004) 41 San Diego Law Review 1551.Google Scholar
Thaler, R H and Susntein, C R, Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness (Penguin 2008).Google Scholar
Thompson, S D, “Liability of Corporations for Exemplary Damages” (1895) 41 Central Law Journal 308.Google Scholar
Tilley, C C, “Private Law, Public Law, and the Production of American Virtue” (2020) 115 Northwestern University Law Review Online 270.Google Scholar
Tonry, M, “Is Proportionality in Punishment Possible, and Achievable?” in Tonry, M (ed), Of One-Eyed and Toothless Miscreants: Making the Punishment Fit the Crime? (Oxford University Press 2019) 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonry, M, “Preface,” in Tonry, M (ed), Of One-Eyed and Toothless Miscreants: Making the Punishment Fit the Crime? (Oxford University Press 2019) vii–x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A and Kahneman, D, “The Framing of Decisions and Psychology of Choice” (1981) 211 Science 453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, A and Kahneman, D, “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases” (1974) 185 Science 1124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Twerski, A D and Henderson, J A (Jr), “Manufacturers’ Liability for Defective Product Designs: The Triumph of Risk-Utility” (2009) 74 Brooklyn Law Review 1061.Google Scholar
Twigg-Flesner, C, “Guiding Principles for Updating the Product Liability Directive for the Digital Age” (2021) ELI Innovation Paper Series.Google Scholar
Tyler, T R, “The Psychology of Aggregation: Promise and Potential Pitfalls” (2015) 64 De Paul Law Review 711.Google Scholar
Van Boom, W H, Borghetti, J-S, Bloch Ehlers, A, Karner, E, Nolan, D, Oliphant, K, Scarso, A, Ulfbeck, V and Wagner, G, “Product Liability in Europe,” in Koziol, H, Green, M D, Lunney, M, Oliphant, K and Lixin, Y (eds), Product Liability: Fundamental Questions in a Comparative Perspective (De Gruyter 2017) 255–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, E, Mulder, L B and Kwaadsteniet, E W, “For the Common Good? The Use of Sanctions in Social Dilemmas,” in Van Lange, P A M, Rockendbach, B and Yamagishi, T (eds), Reward and Punishment in Social Dilemmas (Oxford University Press 2014) 70–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Uytsel, S, Different Liability Regimes for Autonomous Vehicles: One Preferable Above the Other? Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation (Springer 2021).Google Scholar
Vanleenhove, C and Meurkens, L (eds), The Recognition and Enforcement of Punitive Damages Judgments across the Globe: Insights from Various Continents (Eleven International Publishing 2023).Google Scholar
Varuhas, J N E, “The Concept of ‘Vindication’ in the Law of Torts: Rights, Interests and Damages” (2014) 34(2) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidmar, N and Miller, D T, “Social Psychological Processes Underlying Attitudes toward Legal Punishment” (1980) 14 Law and Society Review 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viscusi, W K, “Pricing Lives for Corporate and Governmental Risk Decisions” (2015) 6(2) Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viscusi, W K, “The Challenge of Punitive Damages Mathematics” (2001) 30 Journal of Legal Studies 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viscusi, W K, “Corporate Risk Analysis: A Reckless Act?” (2000) 52 Stanford Law Review 547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viscusi, W K, “The Social Costs of Punitive Damages against Corporations in Environmental and Safety Torts” (1998) 87 Georgetown Law Journal 285.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W K, “Why There Is No Defense of Punitive Damages” (1998) 87 Georgetown Law Journal 381.Google Scholar
Von Hirsch, A, “Proportionality in the Philosophy of Punishment” (1992) 16 Crime and Justice 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Hirsch, A, Roberts, J V, Bottoms, A E, Roach, K and Schiff, M (eds), Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice: Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms? (Hart Publishing 2003).Google Scholar
Von Hirsch, A and Shworth, A, Proportionate Sentencing (Oxford University Press 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, G, “Liability Rules for the Digital Age – Aiming for the Brussels Effect” (2022) 13(3) Journal of European Tort Law 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, G, “Robot, Inc.: Personhood for Autonomous Systems?” (2019) 88 Fordham Law Review 591.Google Scholar
Wagner, G, “Punitive Damages,” in Basedow, J, Hopt, K J, Zimmermann, R and Stier, A (eds), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of European Private Law (Oxford University Press 2012) 1403–6.Google Scholar
Wagner, W E, “When a Corporation’s Deliberate Ignorance Causes Harm: Charting a New Role for Tort Law” (2023) 72 DePaul Law Review 413.Google Scholar
Wagner, W E, “When All Else Fails: Regulatory Risky Products through Tort Litigation” (2007) 95 Georgetown Law Journal 693.Google Scholar
Walen, A, “Retributive Justice,” in Zalta, E N and Nodelman, U (eds), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter Edition 2023) Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/justice-retributive/.Google Scholar
Weaver, R and Kysar, D A, “Courting Disaster: Climate Change and the Adjudication of Catastrophe” (2017) 93(1) Notre Dame Law Review 295.Google Scholar
Weiguo Qu, Z W, “Betrayal Aversion in the Source of Risk: Research Methods and Influencing Factors” (2019) 9(4) Advances in Psychology 717.Google Scholar
Weimer, M, “The Origins of ‘Risk’ as an Idea and the Future of Risk Regulation” (2017) 8(1) European Journal of Risk Regulation 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, M H, “Domestic Violence and the Per Se Standard of Outrage” (1995) 54 Maryland Law Review 183.Google Scholar
Weinrib, E J, Reciprocal Freedom. Private Law and Public Right (Oxford University Press 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinrib, E J, “Civil Recourse and Corrective Justice” (2011) 39 Florida State University Law Review 273.Google Scholar
Weinrib, E J, “Two Conceptions of Remedies,” in Rickett, C E F (ed), Justifying Private Law Remedies (Hart Publishing 2008) 3–32.Google Scholar
Weinrib, E J, “Punishment and Disgorgement as Contract Remedies” (2003) 78 Chicago-Kent Law Review 55.Google Scholar
Weinrib, E J, “Understanding Tort Law” (1989) 23 Valparaiso University Law Review 485.Google Scholar
Wendehorst, C, “Strict Liability for AI and other Emerging Technologies” (2020) 11(2) Journal of European Tort Law 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, M E, “A Proposal for Further Common Law Development of the Use of Punitive Damages in Modern Product Liability Litigation” (1989) 40 Alabama Law Review 919.Google Scholar
White, G E, “The Emergence and Development of a Law of Torts, 1870–1930” (2014) 11 University of St. Thomas Law Journal 463.Google Scholar
Whittam, S, “Mind the Compensation Gap: Towards a New European Regime Addressing Civil Liability in the Age of AI” (2022) 30 International Journal of Law and Information Technology 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, J F, The Accidental Republic: Crippled Workingmen, Destitute Widows, and the Remaking of American Law (Harvard University Press 2006).Google Scholar
Witt, J F and Issacharoff, S, “The Inevitability of Aggregate Settlement: An Institutional Account of American Tort Law” (2004) 57 Vanderbilt Law Review 1571.Google Scholar
Wogalter, M S, Brems, D J and Martin, E G, “Risk Perception of Common Consumer Products: Judgments of Accident Frequency and Precautionary Intent” (1993) 24 Journal of Safety Research 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaffe, G, The Age of Culpability: Children and The Nature of Criminal Responsibility (Oxford University Press 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshikawa, J, “Sharing the Costs of Artificial Intelligence: Universal No-Fault Social Insurance for Personal Injuries” (2020) 21(4) Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 1155.Google Scholar
Zedner, L, “Reparation and Retribution: Are They Reconcilable?” (1994) 57 Modern Law Review 228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zipursky, B C, “Palsgraf, Punitive Damages, and Preemption” (2012) 125 Harvard Law Review 1757.Google Scholar
Zipursky, B C, “Punitive Damages after Philip Morris USA v. Williams” (2007) 44 Court Review 134.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 AA
The PDF of this book
conforms to version 2.0 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.