Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 November 2025
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Three Economic EnlightenmentsOld–New Lessons for Business Ethics, pp. 175 - 190Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Anderson, E. (1995). Value in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. H., & Sun, P. Y. T. (2017). Reviewing leadership styles: Overlaps and the need for a new “full-range” theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19, 76–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, (1984). Complete Works of Aristotle, Volume 2: The Revised Oxford Translation, ed. by Barnes, J.. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (2014). Nicomachean Ethics, ed. by Crisp, R.. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, D. G., & Harris, J. D. (eds.) (2012). Kantian Business Ethics: Critical Perspectives. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, K. M., & Reill, P. H. (2001). What’s Left of Enlightenment? A Postmodern Question. Stanford, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Barile, N. L. (2012). Renaissance Monti di Pietà in modern scholarship: Themes, studies, and historiographic trends. Renaissance and Reformation, 35(3), 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bee, M. (2021). The pleasure of exchange: Adam Smith’s third kind of self-love. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 43(1), 118–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bee, M., & Desmarais-Tremblay, M. (2023). The birth of Homo Œconomicus: The methodological debate on the economic agent from JS Mill to V. Pareto. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 45(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, R. (1987). “Da metafisico a mercatante”: Antonio Genovesi and the development of a new language of commerce in eighteenth-century Naples. In Pagden, A. (ed.), The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, J. ([1790] 2007). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. New York, Dover Philosophical Classics.Google Scholar
Beschorner, T. (2006). Ethical theory and business practices: The case of discourse ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, F. (2009). Why the responsible practice of business ethics calls for a due regard for history. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2018). The New Spirit of Capitalism. London, Verso Books.Google Scholar
Bonica, M. J., & Klein, D. B. (2021). Adam Smith on reputation, commutative justice, and defamation laws. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 184, 788–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgerson, J. L. (2023). On the harmony of feminist ethics and business ethics. In Panter, M., & Werhane, P. H. (eds.), Leadership, Gender, and Organization. Cham, Springer International Publishing, 37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, N. (2000). A Kantian theory of leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 21(4), 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, N. (2002). A Kantian approach to business ethics. In Donaldson, T., Werhane, P. H., & Cording, M. (eds.), Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach. New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 61–71.Google Scholar
Bowie, N. (2017). Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenkert, G. G. (2016). Business ethics and human rights: An overview. Business and Human Rights Journal, 1(2), 277–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, L. (2007). The “technology of happiness” and the tradition of economic science. In Bruni, L., & Porta, P. L. (eds.), Handbook of Economics of Happiness. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 24–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, L. (2012). The Genesis and Ethos of the Market. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, L. (2017). On the concept of economia civile and “Felicitas Publica”: a comment on Federico D’Onofrio. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 39(2), 273–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, L. (2023). Capitalism and Christianity: Origins, Spirit and Betrayal of the Market Economy. Abingdon, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, L. (2024). Capitalismo meridiano: alle radici dello spirito mercantile tra religione e profitto. Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Bruni, L., & Porta, P. L. (2003). Economia civile and pubblica felicità in the Italian Enlightenment. History of Political Economy, 35(5), 361–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, L., & Santori, P. (2018). The plural roots of rewards: Awards and incentives in Aquinas and Genovesi. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 25(4), 637–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, L., & Santori, P. (2022a). The Adam Smith problem theologically reconsidered. In Ballor, J. (ed.), Theology, Morality and Adam Smith. London, Routledge, 258–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, L., & Santori, P. (2022b). The other invisible hand: The social and economic effects of theodicy in Vico and Genovesi. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 29(3), 548–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, L., Santori, P., & Zamagni, S. (2021). Lezioni di Storia del Pensiero Economico. Dall’Antichità al Novecento. Rome, Città Nuova.Google Scholar
Bruni, L., & Sugden, R. (2008). Fraternity: Why the market need not be a morally free zone. Economics & Philosophy, 24(1), 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, L., & Sugden, R. (2013). Reclaiming virtue ethics for economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(4), 141–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, L., & Zamagni, S. (2007). Civil Economy: Efficiency, Equity, Public Happiness. Oxford, Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Card, D., & Smith, N. A. (2020). On consequentialism and fairness. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 3(34), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassirer, E. ([1865] 1981). Kant’s Life and Thought. New Heaven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Chan, G. K. Y. (2008). The relevance and value of Confucianism in contemporary business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chazan, P. (1993). Rousseau as psycho-social moralist: The distinction between amour de soi and amour-propre. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 10(4), 341–354.Google Scholar
Chiarenza, M. (1993). Dante’s Lady Poverty. Dante Studies, with the Annual Report of the Dante Society, 111, 153–175.Google Scholar
Ciulla, J. B. (2020). The Search for Ethics in Leadership, Business, and Beyond. Cham, Springer Nature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, A., Matten, D., Glozer, S., & Spence, L. (2019). Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, C. (2011). The repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act and the current financial crisis. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 9(1), 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, Sage.Google Scholar
Dal Degan, F. (2018). Antonio Genovesi and Italian economic thought: When ethics matters in economics. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 25(4), 524–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, P. (2021). The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review (Abridged Version). London, HM Treasury.Google Scholar
Davis, P. (1990). Lives and Times of Ebenezer Scrooge. New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
De Cruz, A. F. (2024). Business Ethics: An Institutional Governance Approach to Ethical Decision Making. Singapore, Springer Nature Singapore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Pierris, G., & Friedman, M. (2024). Kant and Hume on causality. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2024/entries/kant-hume-causality/. Last access: February 12, 2025.Google Scholar
De Roover, R. (1954). New interpretations of the history of banking. Journal of World History, 2(1), 38–76.Google Scholar
Derry, R., & Green, R. M. (1989). Ethical theory in business ethics: A critical assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 521–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Onofrio, F. (2015). On the concept of “felicitas publica” in eighteenth-century political economy. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 37(3), 449–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dragonetti, G. (1788). Origine dei feudi nei regni di Napoli e Sicilia. Naples, Nella Stamperia Regale.Google Scholar
Dubbink, W. (2018). The bystander in commercial life: Obliged by beneficence or rescue? Journal of Business Ethics, 149, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubbink, W, & van der Deijl, W. (2023). Corporate responsibility and the morality of the market. In Dubbink, W., & van der Deijl, W. (eds.), Business Ethics: A Philosophical Introduction. Cham, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubbink, W., & Van Liedekerke, L. (2014). Grounding positive duties in commercial life. Journal of Business Ethics, 120, 527–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubbink, W., & Van Liedekerke, L. (2020). Rethinking the purity of moral motives in business: Kant against moral purism. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(3), 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubbink, W., & Slegers, R. (2022). The trolley dilemma and the art of making judgments on concrete situations. Ethical Perspectives, 29(3), 313–334.Google Scholar
Dumez, H. (2015). What is a case, and what is a case study? Bulletin of Sociological Methodology, 127(1), 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duska, R. F. (1993). Aristotle: A pre-modern post-modern? Implications for business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 3(3), 227–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In David, P. A., & Reder, M. W. (eds.), Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz. New York: Academic Press, 89–125.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. (1987). Toward a Kantian socio-economics. Review of Social Economy, 45(1), 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzioni, A. (2003). Communitarianism. In Rossel, S. A. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Community: From the Village to the Virtual World. Ottawa, Carleton University Press, 224–228.Google Scholar
Evensky, J. (2005). “Chicago Smith” versus “Kirkaldy Smith.” History of Political Economy, 37(2), 197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatima, T., & Elbanna, S. (2023). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) implementation: A review and a research agenda towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(1), 105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, F. (1852). Preface. In Biblioteca dell’Economista, vol. 3. Turin, Cugini Pomba ed Editori Librai.Google Scholar
Fiorentino, F. (1887). Manuale di Storia della Filosofia a Uso dei Licei, Diviso in Tre Parti. Seconda Edizione. Naples, Morano.Google Scholar
Fleischacker, S. (1991). Philosophy in moral practice: Kant and Adam Smith. Kant-Studien, 82(3), 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischacker, S. (1996). Values behind the market: Kant’s response to the “Wealth of Nations.” History of Political Thought, 17(3), 379–407.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (2023). Foreword. In Painter-Morland, M., & Ten Bos, R. (eds.), Business Ethics and Continental Philosophy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frey, B. S. (1997). Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. ([1992] 2006). The End of History and the Last Man. New York, Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Galiani, F. ([1750] 1803). Della Moneta, Collezione Custodi di Scrittori Classici di Economia Politica. Parte Moderna. Milan, De Stefanis.Google Scholar
Genovesi, A. ([1753] 1984). Discorso sopra il vero fine delle lettere e delle scienze. Naples, Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici.Google Scholar
Genovesi, A. (1757). “Ragionamento sul commercio universale.” In Cary, J., Storia del commercio della Gran Brettagna scritta da John Cary mercatante di Bristol, tradotta in nostra volgar lingua da Pietro Genovesi giureconsulto napoletano. Con un Ragionamento sul commercio in universale, e alcune annotazioni riguardanti l’economia del nostro regno, di Antonio Genovesi. Naples, Benedetto Gessari, vii–cviii.Google Scholar
Genovesi, A. ([1765–1767] 1824–1825). Lezioni di commercio o sia d’economia civile con un ragionamento sull’agricoltura e un altro sul commercio in universale di Antonio Genovesi. Milan, Società Tipografica dei Classici Italiani.Google Scholar
Genovesi, A. ([1766] 1973). Della diceosina o sia della filosofia del giusto e dell’onesto. Milan, Marzorati.Google Scholar
Genovesi, A. (1775). Istituzioni di metafisica per li principianti del signor abbate Antonio Genovesi. Ad uso delle scuole pubbliche di Venezia. Venice, Tommaso Bettinelli Editore.Google Scholar
Genovesi, A. ([1777] 1838a). Lo spirito delle leggi di Carlo Secondat Barone di Montesquieu con le annotazioni dell’abate Antonio Genovesi. Tomo Primo. Milan, Giovanni Silvestri.Google Scholar
Genovesi, A. ([1777] 1838b). Lo spirito delle leggi di Carlo Secondat Barone di Montesquieu con le annotazioni dell’abate Antonio Genovesi. Tomo Secondo. Milan, Giovanni Silvestri.Google Scholar
Genovesi, A. (1835). Logica e Metafisica di Antonio Genovesi. Milan, Società Tipografica dei Classici Italiani.Google Scholar
Gentile, G. ([1903] 2003). Storia della filosofia italiana. Dal Genovesi al Galluppi. Florence, Le Lettere.Google Scholar
Gibson, K. (2023). Ethics and Business: An Introduction. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, L. R. (2019). Decolonizing philosophy. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 57, 16–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graafland, J. (2022). Ethics and Economics: An Introduction to Free Markets, Equality and Happiness. Oxon, Routledge.Google Scholar
Graafland, J., & De Gelder, E. (2023). The impact of perceived due care on trustworthiness and free market support in the Dutch banking sector. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32(1), 384–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. (2007). Enlightenment’s Wake: Politics and Culture at the Close of the Modern Age. London, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, C. F. (1989). Business ethics in banking. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 631–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guasti, N. (2006). Antonio Genovesi’s Diceosina: Source of the Neapolitan enlightenment. History of European Ideas, 32(4), 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guriev, S., & Papaioannou, E. (2022). The political economy of populism. Journal of Economic Literature, 60(3), 753–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, K. (1996). Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamowy, R. (1987). The Scottish Enlightenment and the Theory of Spontaneous Order. Carbondale, Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, R. (2011). The Cratchits on film: Neo-Victorian visions of domesticity. In Kohlke, M., & Gutleben, C. (eds.), Neo-Victorian Families. Amsterdam, Rodopi, 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. (1975). Can the maximin principle serve as a basis for morality? A critique of John Rawls’s theory. American Political Science Review, 69(2), 594–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, O. (2017). Incomplete contracts and control. American Economic Review, 107(7), 1731–1752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, O., & Moore, J. (1988). Incomplete contracts and renegotiation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 56(4), 755–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, E. (2008). The ethics and implications of paying participants in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(4), 335–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, E. (1995). The commerce of sympathy: Adam Smith on the emergence of morals. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 33(3), 447–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herman, A. (2003). The Scottish Enlightenment: The Scots’ Invention of the Modern World. London, Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
Herman, B. (1984). Mutual aid and respect for persons. Ethics, 94(4), 577–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, B. (1993). The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Herman, B. (2016). Morality as Rationality: A Study of Kant’s Ethics. London, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzog, L. (2013). The Community of Commerce: Smith’s rhetoric of sympathy in the opening of the Wealth of Nations. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 46(1), 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzog, L. (2014). Adam Smith on markets and justice. Philosophy Compass, 9(12), 864–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, N. S. (1983). Isaac Newton’s influence on Adam Smith’s natural laws in economics. Journal of the History of Ideas, 44(3), 497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, B. (2023). Rule consequentialism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism-rule/. Last accessed Oct. 15, 2023.Google Scholar
Iannaccone, L. R. (1991). The consequences of religious market structure: Adam Smith and the economics of religion. Rationality and Society, 3(2), 156–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, J. (2006). Enlightenment! Which Enlightenment? Journal of the History of Ideas, 67(3), 523–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, P. S. (1996). Managing credit for the rural poor: Lessons from the Grameen Bank. World Development, 24(1), 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Januard, P. (2021). Analysis risk and commercial risk: The first treatment of usury in Thomas Aquinas’s Commentary on the Sentences. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 28(4), 599–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyner, B. E., & Payne, D. (2002). Evolution and implementation: A study of values, business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaner, S. (2014). Facilitator’s Guide to Participatory Decision-Making. San Francisco, Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Kant., I. ([1781] 1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. ([1783] 2004). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. ([1784] 1991). An answer to the question: “What is Enlightenment?” In Reiss, H. S. (ed.), Kant: Political Writings. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. ([1785] 2012). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. by Gregor, M. & Timmermann, J.. New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1996). The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, ed by Gregor, M. J. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2016). Natural right course lecture notes by Feyerabend. In Rauscher, F. (ed.), Lectures and Drafts on Political Philosophy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, J., & Kittay, E. F. (2017). Feminist ethics of care. In Garry, A., Khader, S. J., & Stone, A. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Feminist Philosophy. New York, Routledge, 540–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, G. (2011). The hidden Adam Smith in his alleged theology. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 33(3), 385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, P. (2011). Kant and Cosmopolitanism: The Philosophical Ideal of World Citizenship. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, P. (2017). Contradiction and Kant’s formula of universal law. Kant-Studien, 108(1), 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knell, M. (2025). Isaac Newton, Robert Simson and Adam Smith. Homo Oeconomicus, 41(1)1–16.Google Scholar
Koehn, D. (2023). Narrative business ethics versus narratives within business ethics: Problems and possibilities from an Aristotelian virtue ethics perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 189(4), 1–17.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. M. (1985). Kant’s formula of universal law. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 66(1–2), 24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, C. M. (1996). Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, C. M. (2013). Kantian ethics, animals, and the law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 33(4), 629–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liedman, S. E. (ed.). (1997). The Postmodernist Critique of the Project of Enlightenment, vol. 58. Amsterdam, Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liedtka, J. M. (1996). Feminist morality and competitive reality: A role for an ethic of care? Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(2), 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, L., & Shih, J. B. (1997). Sources of happiness: A qualitative approach. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(2), 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luban, D. (2012). Adam Smith on vanity, domination, and history. Modern Intellectual History, 9(2), 275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lurie, Y., & Albin, R. (2007). Moral dilemmas in business ethics: From decision procedures to edifying perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, L. (1992). Economics and the public interest: The emergence of economics as an academic subject during the 18th century. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malthus, T. R. ([1798] 1966). An Essay on the Principle of Population. London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marx, K. ([1859] 2002). Preface: A contribution to the critique of political economy. In Raines, J. (ed.), Marx on Religion. Philadelphia, Temple University Press, 107–112.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (2005). Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. London, Penguin.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. (2008). Adam Smith, the last of the former virtue ethicists. History of Political Economy, 40(1), 43–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meijer, K., & Smit, M. (2024). The status of business ethics teaching, research and training: The Netherlands. In Robinson, B., & Enderle, G. (eds.), Global Survey of Business Ethics: 2022–2024: Teaching, Research and Training – Europe. Geneva, Globethics Global Series, 340–373.Google Scholar
Meld Shell, S. (1980). The Rights of Reason. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melé, D. (2024). The Humanistic Person-Centered Company. Cham, Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micewski, E. R., & Troy, C. (2007). Business ethics–deontologically revisited. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(1), 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaelson, C. (2005). Dealing with swindlers and devils: Literature and business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 58, 359–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaelson, C. (2010). Revisiting the global business ethics question. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(2), 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkelsen, J. M. (2013). Kant and the Concept of Race: Late Eighteenth-Century Writings. Albany, State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. ([1861] 2017). Utilitarianism: With Related Remarks from Mill’s Other Writings, ed. by Eggleston, B.. Indianapolis, Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Montes, L. (2003). The Adam Smith problem: Its origins, the stages of the current debate, and one implication for our understanding of sympathy. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 25(1), 63–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montes, L. (2008). Newton’s real influence on Adam Smith and its context. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32(4), 555–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montes, L. (2019). Adam Smith’s foundational idea of sympathetic persuasion. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 43(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulsow, M. (2015). Enlightenment Underground: Radical Germany, 1680–1720. Charlottesville, University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Myint, H. (1977). Adam Smith’s theory of international trade in the perspective of economic development. Economica, 44(175), 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, J. A. (1995). Feminism and economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nersisyan, Y. (2015). The repeal of the Glass–Steagall Act and the Federal Reserve’s extraordinary intervention during the global financial crisis. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 37(4), 545–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolae, M., Ion, I., & Nicolae, E. (2013). The research agenda of spiritual leadership: Where do we stand? Revista De Management Comparat International, 14(4), 551–566.Google Scholar
Niekerk, C. (2003). “Spätaufklärung”: Rethinking the late eighteenth century in German literary history. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 102(3), 317–335.Google Scholar
O’Neill, O. (1975). Acting on Principle: An Essay on Kantian Ethics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Otte, J. T. (2009). Virtuous enterprises: The place of Christian ethics. Finance & Bien Commun, 33(1), 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oz-Salzberger, F. (1995). Translating the Enlightenment: Scottish Civic Discourse in Eighteenth-Century Germany. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pabst, A. (2018). Political economy of virtue: Civil economy, happiness and public trust in the thought of Antonio Genovesi. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 25(4), 582–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pabst, A., & Scazzieri, R. (2019). Virtue, production, and the politics of commerce: Genovesi’s “civil economy” revisited. History of Political Economy, 51(4), 703–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pabst, A. & Scazzieri, R. (2023). The Constitution of Political Economy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paganelli, M. P. (2015). Recent engagements with Adam Smith and the Scottish enlightenment. History of Political Economy, 47(3), 366–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paganelli, M. P. (2022). Adam Smith and economic development in theory and practice: A rejection of the stadial model? Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 44(1), 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paganelli, M. P., & Simon, F. (2022). Crime and punishment: “Adam Smith’s theory of sentimental law and economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 44(2), 268–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagden, A. (2013). The Enlightenment: And Why It Still Matters. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (1995). Equality or Priority? The Lindley Lecture. University of Kansas: Department of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Pihlström, S. (2003). On the concept of philosophical anthropology. Journal of Philosophical Research, 28, 259–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress. London, Penguin.Google Scholar
Pirson, M. (2017). Humanistic Management: Protecting Dignity and Promoting Well-Being. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porta, P. L. (2018). From economia civile to kameralwissenschaften: The line of descent from Genovesi to Beccaria in pre-Smithian Europe. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 25(4), 531–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pozzo, R. (2016). Review of J. Colin McQuillan, Immanuel Kant: The very idea of a critique of pure reason, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 17, 1–3.Google Scholar
Provis, C. (2020). Business ethics, Confucianism and the different faces of ritual. Journal of Business Ethics, 165(2), 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, A. M. (2005). Enlightenment and reform: An overview of culture and politics in Enlightenment Italy. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 10(2), 142–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raphael, D. D. (1988). Newton and Adam Smith. In Sweet-Stayer, M. (ed.), Newton’s Dream. Montreal, Queen’s Quarterly, 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (2000). Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reill, P. H. (1975). The German Enlightenment and the Rise of Historicism. Berkeley, University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinert, S. A. (2011). Translating Empire: Emulation and the Origins of Political Economy. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisman, D. A. (1998). Adam Smith on market and state. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 154(2), 357–383.Google Scholar
Rickless, S. C. (2018). Brief for an inclusive anti‐canon. Metaphilosophy, 49(1–2), 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, J. (1997). The Enlightenment above national context: Political economy in eighteenth-century Scotland and Naples. The Historical Journal, 40(3), 667–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, R. M. (2022). Business Ethics: Kant, Virtue, and the Nexus of Duty – Foundations and Case Studies. Cham, Springer Nature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, B., & Enderle, G. (2024). Global Survey of Business Ethics 2022–2024: Teaching, Research and Training, vol. 3, Europe. Geneva, Globethics Publications.Google Scholar
Rosile, G. A. (ed.). (2016). Tribal Wisdom for Business Ethics. Bingley, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosmini, A. ([1865] 1993). The Philosophy of Right: The Essence of Right, vol 1. Durham, Rosmini House.Google Scholar
Rosmini, A. (1883). The Origin of Ideas by Antonio Rosmini Serbati. Translated from Fifth Italian Edition of the Nuovo Saggio sull’Origine delle Idee. London, Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Rothschild, E. (1994). Adam Smith and the invisible hand. The American Economic Review, 84(2), 319–322.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J. ([1755] 1997). Discourse on the Origins and Foundations of Inequality Among Men. In Gourevitch, V. (ed.), The Discourses and Other Early Writings, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. (1982). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. (2012). What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of the Markets. Farrar, Straus and Giroux (Ebook).Google Scholar
Santori, P. (2019). The foundation of the right of property: Rosmini as Genovesi’s interpreter. International Review of Economics, 66(4), 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santori, P. (2020). Donum, exchange and common good in Aquinas: The dawn of civil economy. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 27(2), 276–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santori, P. (2021). Thomas Aquinas and the Civil Economy Tradition: The Mediterranean Spirit of Capitalism. London, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santori, P. (2022). Is relationality always other-oriented? Adam Smith, catholic social teaching, and civil economy. Philosophy of Management, 21(1), 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santori, P. (2022). Idleness and the very sparing hand of God: The invisible tie between Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and Smith’s Wealth of Nations. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 44(2), 246–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santori, P. (2024). The market in the kingdom of ends: Kant’s moral philosophy for business ethics. Philosophy of Management, 23, 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santori, P. (2024). The curious case of the three Adam Smiths: Women and the Nobel Prize in economics. Journal of Contextual Economics–Schmollers Jahrbuch, 1–16.Google Scholar
Satz, D. (2010). Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The moral Limits of Markets. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabas, M., & De Marchi, N. (2003). Introduction to oeconomies in the age of Newton. History of Political Economy, 35(5), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, B. (2024). Henry Sidgwick. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2024/entries/sidgwick/. Last accessed Oct. 15, 2024.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. ([1954] 1986). History of Economic Analysis. Taylor & Francis e-library.Google Scholar
Schwartz, T. (1972). Rationality and the myth of the maximum. Noûs, 6(4), 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1977). Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 317–344.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1980). Equality of what? In Tanner Lectures on Human Values, vol. 1. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2011b). Uses and abuses of Adam Smith. History of Political Economy, 43(2), 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, W., & Miller, D. (2024). Business Ethics: A Textbook with Cases. Boston, Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Singer, P. (2023). Animal Liberation Now: The Definitive Classic Renewed. New York, Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Singer, E., & Kulka, R. A. (2002). Paying respondents for survey participation. Studies of Welfare Populations: Data Collection and Research Issues, 4, 105–128.Google Scholar
Slegers, R. (2024). Vanity and social media: Adam Smith reassures us that we are not all narcissists. Journal of Contextual Economics–Schmollers Jahrbuch, 1–14.Google Scholar
Smith, A. ([1776] 1976). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. In Campbell, R. H., Sranner, A. S., & Todd, B. (eds.), The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, vol. 2. Indianapolis, Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Smith, A. ([1896] 1982). Lectures on Jurisprudence. In Meek, R. L., Raphael, D. D., & Stein, P. G. (eds.), The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Indianapolis, Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Solomon, R. C. (2004). Aristotle, ethics and business organizations. Organization Studies, 25(6), 1021–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, R., & Proops, I. (2024). Kant and the king: Lying promises, conventional implicature, and hypocrisy. Ratio, 37(1), 51–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapelbroek, K. (2006). Preserving the Neapolitan state: Antonio Genovesi and Ferdinando Galiani on commercial society and planning economic growth. History of European Ideas, 32(4), 406–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G. J. (1971). Smith’s travels on the ship of state. History of Political Economy, 3(2), 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G. J. (1976). The successes and failures of Professor Smith. Journal of Political Economy, 84(6), 1199–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stobart, J., & Van Damme, I. (2016). Introduction: Markets in modernization – Transformations in urban market space and practice, c. 1800–c. 1970. Urban History, 43(3), 358–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugden, R. (2002). Beyond sympathy and empathy: Adam Smith’s concept of fellow-feeling. Economics & Philosophy, 18(1), 63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugden, R. (2018). The Community of Advantage: A Behavioural Economist’s Defence of the Market. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, C.M., & Cain, D. (2004). Ethical and safety considerations when obtaining information from or about battered women for research purposes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(5), 603–618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surmiak, A. (2020). Ethical concerns of paying cash to vulnerable participants: The qualitative researchers’ views. The Qualitative Report, 25(12), 4461–4481.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. (1996). Paying respondents and informants. Social Research Update, 14, 1–5.Google Scholar
Throop, C. J. (2012). Moral sentiments. In Fassin, D. (ed.), A Companion to Moral Anthropology. Chichester, Wiley-Blackwell, 150–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirole, J. (1999). Incomplete contracts: Where do we stand? Econometrica, 67(4), 741–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todeschini, G. (2024). Christian financial government and Jewish political culture in Italy (15th–17th c.): A dialectic of modernity. Jews and State Building: Early Modern Italy, and Beyond, 79, 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toenjes, R. H. (2002). Why be moral in business? A Rawlsian approach to moral motivation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(1), 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonelli, G. (1974). Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason within the tradition of modern logic. In Funke, G. (ed.), Akten des 4. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses: Mainz, 6.–10. April 1974, Teil 3: Vorträge. Berlin, De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tonelli, G. (1994). Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason within the Tradition of Modern Logic, ed by Chandler, D. H. Zürich, Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Tribe, K. (2016). The German reception of Adam Smith. In Mizuta, H. (ed.), A Critical Bibliography of Adam Smith. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Van der Deijl, W. (2023). Moral reasons. In Dubbink, W., & van der Deijl, W. (eds.), Business Ethics: A Philosophical Introduction, Cham, Springer, 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varden, H. (2017). Kant and women. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 98(4), 653–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickers, M. R. (2005). Business ethics and the HR role: past, present, and future. Human Resource Planning, 28(1), 26–33.Google Scholar
Viner, J. (2015). The Role of Providence in the Social Order: An Essay in Intellectual History. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wahba, M. (1990). Ideals of the enlightenment for today. Social Philosophy Today, 3, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walschots, M. (2022). Achtung in Kant and Smith. Kant-Studien, 113(2), 238–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, E., & Stan, M. (2023). Kant’s Philosophy of Science. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/kant-science/. Last accessed Feb. 12, 2025.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (2005). Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London, Routledge Classics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, A. (2017). Decolonizing feminist freedom: Indigenous relationalities. In Mclaren, M. A. (ed.), Decolonizing Feminism: Transnational Feminism and Globalization. London, Rowman & Littlefield, 257–287.Google Scholar
Weiss, J. W. (2021). Business Ethics: A Stakeholder and Issues Management Approach. Oakland, Westchester Publishing Services.Google Scholar
Werhane, P. H. (1999). Moral Imagination and Management Decision-Making. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
White, M. D. (2010). Adam Smith and Immanuel Kant: On markets, duties, and moral sentiments. Forum for Social Economics, 39, 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicksteed, P. H. ([1910] 1933). The Common Sense of Political Economy. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Williams, D. (2014). Adam Smith and colonialism. Journal of International Political Theory, 10(3), 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollstonecraft, M. ([1792] 2019). The Feminist Papers: A Vindication of the Rights of Women. Layton, Gibbs Smith Publisher.Google Scholar
Zafirovski, M. (2010). The Enlightenment and Its Effects on Modern Society. New York, Springer.Google Scholar
Zamagni, S. (2020). On the birth of economic science during the Italian-Scottish Enlightenment: Two paradigms compared. Roczniki Nauk Społecznych, 48(2), 5–28.Google Scholar
Zambelli, P. (1978). Antonio Genovesi and eighteenth-century empiricism in Italy. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 16(2), 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.