Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-09T20:13:12.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 5 - Gravity Gradient Stabilization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

Marcel J. Sidi
Marcel J. Sidi
Affiliation:
Israel Aircraft Industries Ltd
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The present and remaining chapters deal with attitude control of spacecraft; this section serves as an introduction to all of them. The expression attitude control has the general meaning of controlling the attitude of the satellite. In practice, there exist a multitude of variations to this simple and apparently straightforward expression. The following are some examples of primary control tasks for which the attitude control system is responsible.

  1. In orbital maneuvering and adjustments, the attitude of the satellite must be pointed and held in the desired ΔV direction.

  2. A spin-stabilized satellite may be designed to keep the spin axis of its body pointed at some particular direction in space.

  3. A nadir-pointing three-axis-stabilized satellite must keep its three Euler angles close to null relative to the orbit reference frame; this is true of most communications satellites.

  4. In earth-surveying satellites, the attitude control system is designed to allow the operative payload to track defined targets on the earth's surface.

  5. A scientific satellite observing the sky must maneuver its optical instruments toward different star targets on the celestial sphere in some prescribed pattern of angular motion.

The few examples listed and the many others not mentioned suggest a multitude of different tasks and missions to be performed by the attitude control system. However, we shall see that some features are common to all such systems.

An important distinction for attitude control concepts is between passive and active attitude control. Passive attitude control is attractive because the hardware required is less complicated and relatively inexpensive. Natural physical properties of the satellite and its environment are used to control the s/c attitude. However, the achievable accuracies with passive attitude control are generally much lower than those that are possible with active attitude control, which uses sophisticated (and much more expensive) control instrumentation.

Another important distinction is between attitude-maneuvering and nadir-pointing (earth-pointing) stabilized satellites.

Type
Chapter
Information
Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
A Practical Engineering Approach
 , pp. 112 - 131
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bryson, A. (1983), “Stabilization and Control of Spacecraft,” Microfiche supplement to the Proceedings of the Annual AAS Rocky Mountain Guidance and Control Conference (5–9 February, Keystone, CO). San Diego, CA: American Astronautical Society.Google Scholar
Clopp, W., and Osborn, L. (1987), “Satellite Bus Design for the Multiple Satellite System,” AIAA/DARPA Meeting on Lightweight Satellite Systems (4–6 August, Monterey, CA). Washington, DC: AIAA. 105–15.
Fleeter, R., and Warner, R. (1989), “Guidance and Control of Miniature Satellites,” Automatic Control in Aerospace, IFAC (Tsukuba, Japan). Oxford, UK: Pergamon. pp. 243–8.
Hughes, P. C. (1988), Spacecraft Attitude Dynamics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kaplan, M. (1976), Modern Spacecraft Dynamics and Control. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Martel, F., Pal, P., and Psiaki, M. (1988), “Active Magnetic Control System for Gravity Gradient Stabilized Spacecraft,” Second Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites (26–28 September, Logan, UT). Washington, DC: AIAA.
Runavot, J. (1980), “Le Système de Commande d7Attitude et d'Orbite: Généralités et Définition du Système,” in Le Mouvement du Véhicule Spatial en Orbite. Toulouse, France: Centre National d'Études Spatiales. 909–28.Google Scholar
William, H. C. and Osborn, L. (1987), “Satellite Bus and Design for the Multiple Satellite System,” AIAA/DARPA Meeting on Lightweight Satellite Systems (4–6 August, Monterey, CA). Washington, DC: AIAA.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×