Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-5q6g5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-21T16:13:57.996Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2025

Alena Drieschova
Alena Drieschova
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Representants and International Orders
The Staging of Political Authority
 , pp. 272 - 312
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aalberts, Tanja, Kurowska, Xymena, Leander, Anna, Mälksoo, Maria, Heath-Kelly, Charlotte, Lobato, Luisa, and Svensson, Ted. 2020. ‘Rituals of World Politics: On (Visual) Practices Disordering Things.’ Critical Studies on Security 8(3): 240–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abélès, Marc. 1996. En attente d’Europe. Baume-les-Dames: Hachette.Google Scholar
Abélès, Marc. 2000a. ‘L’Europe: un objet conceptual mal identifié’, in Abensour, Alexandre (ed.) Le XXe siècle en France: Art, Politique, Philosophie. Paris: Berger-Levrault.Google Scholar
Abélès, Marc. 2000b. ‘Virtual Europe’, in Bellier, Irène and Wilson, Thomas (eds.) An Anthropology of the European Union: Building, Imagining and Experiencing the New Europe. Oxford: Berg, pp. 31–52.Google Scholar
Abélès, Marc. 2000c. Un ethnologue à l’Assemblée. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Abélès, Marc. 2007. Le spectacle du pouvoir. Paris: l’Herne.Google Scholar
Abélès, Marc. 2008. Anthropologie de la globalisation. Paris: Éditions Payot & Rivages.Google Scholar
Abrahams, Max. 2018. Rules for Rebels: The Science of Victory in Militant History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramson, Scott. 2017. ‘The Economic Origins of the Territorial State.’ International Organization 71(1): 97–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adcock, Michael. 2010. ‘Parables of Power: Architecture and the “Ancien Regime”.’ Agora 45(3): 11–17.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 2019. World Ordering: A Social Theory of Cognitive Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Drieschova, Alena. 2021. ‘The Epistemological Challenge of Truth Subversion to the Liberal International Order.’ International Organization 75(2): 359–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Pouliot, Vincent (eds.). 2011. International Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2008. ‘Organized Duplicity? When States Opt Out of the European Union’, in Adler-Nissen, Rebecca and Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas (eds.) Sovereignty Games: Instrumentalizing State Sovereignty in Europe and Beyond. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2009. ‘Late Sovereign Diplomacy.’ The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 4: 121–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2014. Opting Out of the European Union: Diplomacy, Sovereignty and European Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, and Drieschova, Alena. 2019. ‘Track-Change Diplomacy: Technology, Affordances, and the Practice of International Negotiations.’ International Studies Quarterly 63(3): 431–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, and Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas. 2008. Sovereignty Games: Instrumentalizing State Sovereignty in Europe and Beyond. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, and Tsivonoi, Alexei. 2019. ‘International Misrecognition: The Politics of Humour and National Identity in Israel’s Public Diplomacy.’ European Journal of International Relations 25(1): 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, and Zarakol, Ayse. 2021. ‘Struggles for Recognition: The Liberal International Order and the Merger of Its Discontents.’ International Organization 75(2): 611–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, Andersen, Katrine Emilie, and Hansen, Lene. 2020. ‘Images, Emotions, and International Politics: The Death of Alan Kurdi.’ Review of International Studies 46(1): 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, Galpin, Charlotte, and Rosamond, Ben. 2017. ‘Performing Brexit: How a Post-Brexit World Is Imagined outside the United Kingdom.’ British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19(3): 573–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aggestam, Lisbeth, and Hedling, Elsa. 2019. ‘Performing EU Foreign Policy Leadership: A Dramaturgical Approach.’ CERGU’s Working Paper Series 2019:2. University of Gothenburg, Centre for European Research.Google Scholar
Agné, Hans. 2013. ‘The Politics of International Recognition: Symposium Introduction.’ International Theory 5(1): 94–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, John. 1994. ‘The Territorial Trap: The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory.’ Review of International Political Economy 1(1): 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, John. 2002. ‘Political Power and Geographical Scale’, in Ferguson, Yale and Jones, Barry (eds.) Political Space: Frontiers of Change and Governance in a Globalized World. New York: State University of New York Press, pp. 115–129.Google Scholar
Agnew, John. 2009. Globalization and Sovereignty. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Agnew, John, and Duncan, James. 1989. ‘Introduction’, in Agnew, John and Duncan, James (eds.) The Power of Place: Bringing together Geographical and Sociological Imaginations. Boston: Unwin Hyman, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Agulhon, Maurice. 1981. Marianne in Combat: Imagery and Republican Symbols from 1789 to 1880. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ahearn, Laura. 2001. ‘Language and Agency.’ Annual Review of Anthropology 30: 109–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, Mathias. 2010. ‘Modern Systems Theory in World Politics’, in Albert, Mathias, Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Wendt, Alexander (eds.) New Systems Theories of World Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 43–68.Google Scholar
Allan, Bentley. 2017. ‘Producing the Climate: States, Scientists, and the Constitution of Global Governance Objects.’ International Organization 71(1): 131–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, Bentley. 2018. Scientific Cosmology and International Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, Pierre, and Keller, Alexis. 2006. What Is a Just Peace? Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Graham. 2018. ‘The Myth of the Liberal Order.’ Foreign Affairs 97(4): 124–133.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 2006. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. S. 1961. Europe in the Eighteenth Century 1713–1783. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. S. 1988. War and Society in Europe of the Old Regime, 1618–1789. London: Fontana Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. S. 1993. The Rise of Modern Diplomacy 1450–1919. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. S. 1998. The Origins of the Modern European State System, 1494–1618. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Anderson, Perry. 2013. Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Anghie, Antony. 2005. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, Christopher. 2004. ‘Restructuring Authority and Territoriality’, in Ansell, Christopher and Di Palma, Giuseppe (eds.) Restructuring Territoriality: Europe and the United States Compared. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aradau, Claudia. 2010. ‘Security That Matters: Critical Infrastructure and Objects of Protection.’ Security Dialogue 41(5): 491–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardant, Gabriel. 1975. ‘Financial Policy and Economic Infrastructure of Modern States and Nations’, in Tilly, Charles (ed.) The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 164–242.Google Scholar
Argan, Guilio. 1969. The Renaissance City. New York: Braziller.Google Scholar
Arnull, Anthony, and Wincott, Daniel (eds.). 2003. Accountability and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashley, Richard. 1984. ‘The Poverty of Neorealism.’ International Organization 38(2): 225–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashley, Richard. 1988. ‘Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique.’ Millennium 17: 227–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkin, Albert. 2005. ‘Peirce on the Index and Indexical Reference.’ Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41(1): 161–188.Google Scholar
Auchter, Jessica. 2013. ‘Border Monuments: Memory, Counter-Memory, and (B)ordering Practices along the US–Mexico Border.’ Review of International Studies 39(2): 291–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auchter, Jessica. 2022. Global Corps Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Augé, Marc. 2008. Non-places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Austin, Jonathan Luke, with Leander, Anna. 2022. ‘Visibility: Practices of Seeing and Overlooking’, in Drieschova, Alena, Bueger, Christian, and Hopf, Ted (eds.) Conceptualizing International Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Autrand, Francoise. 1996. in Bely, Lucien (ed.) L’invention de la diplomatie – Moyen Ages – Temps modernes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Baele, Stephane J., and Balzacq, Thierry. 2022. ‘International Rituals: An Analytical Framework and Its Theoretical Repertoires’. Review of International Studies 48(1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bak, Janos. 1990. ‘Introduction: Coronation Studies – Past, Present, and Future’, in Bak, Janos (ed.) Coronations: Medieval and Early Modern Monarchic Ritual. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bankowski, Zenon, and Christodoulidis, Emilios. 1998. ‘The European Union as an essentially Contested Project.’ European Law Journal 4(4): 341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbiche, Bernard, and de Dainville-Barbiche, Segolene. 1996. ‘Les légats a latere à l’époque moderne et le personnel des légations’, in Bely, Lucien (ed.) L’invention de la diplomatie – Moyen Ages – Temps modernes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 283–293.Google Scholar
Bardi, Luciano. 2014. ‘The Structure of the Europarty System after the 2014 Elections of the European Parliament’, Challenges in Constitutional Affairs in the New Term: Taking Stock and Looking Forward, Workshop for the AFCO Committee, 6 November 2014, pp. 76–87.Google Scholar
Barker, Rodney. 2001. Legitimating Identities: The Self-Presentations of Ruler and Subjects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barraclough, Geoffrey. 1962. The Origins of Modern Germany. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barry, Andrew. 1993. ‘The European Community and European Government: Harmonization, Mobility and Space’. Economy and Society 22(3): 314–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartelson, Jens. 2005. A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartelson, Jens. 2010. ‘Double Binds: Sovereignty and the Just War Tradition’, in Kalmo, Hent and Skinner, Quentin (eds.) Sovereignty in Fragments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartelson, Jens. 2014. Sovereignty as Symbolic Form. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beasley, Ryan, Kaarbo, Juliet, and Oppermann, Kai. 2021. ‘Role Theory, Foreign Policy, and the Social Construction of Sovereignty: Brexit Stage Right’. Global Studies Quarterly 1(1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechu, Claire. 1996. ‘Les ambassadeurs français au XVIIIe siècle: Formation et carrière’, in Bely, Lucien (ed.) L’invention de la diplomatie – Moyen Ages – Temps modernes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 331–346.Google Scholar
Beetz, Manfred. 1995. ‘Überlebtes Welttheater: Goethes autobiographische Darstellung der Wahl und Krönung Josephs II. In Farnkfurt/M. 1764’, in Jochen Berns, Jörgen and Rahn, Thomas (eds.) Zeremoniell als höfische Ästhetik in Spätmittelalter und Früher Neuzeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, pp. 572–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behnke, Andreas. 2014. ‘Recognizing the Enemy: Terrorism as Symbolic Violence’, in Lindemann, Thomas and Ringmar, Erik (eds.) The International Politics of Recognition. London: Routledge, pp. 189–206.Google Scholar
Behrens, C. B. A. 1967. The Ancien Regime. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Bellier, Irène. 2000. ‘The European Union, Identity Politics and the Logic of Interests’ Representation’, in Bellier, Irène and Wilson, Thomas (eds.) An Anthropology of the European Union: Building, Imagining and Experiencing the New Europe. Oxford: Berg, pp. 53–73.Google Scholar
Bellier, Irène, and Wilson, Thomas. 2000. ‘Building, Imaging and Experiencing Europe: Institutions and Identities in the European Union’, in Bellier, Irène and Wilson, Thomas (eds.) An Anthropology of the European Union: Building, Imagining and Experiencing the New Europe. Oxford: Berg, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Bély, Lucien. 1996. ‘L’invention de la diplomatie’, in Bély, Lucien (ed.) L’invention de la diplomatie – Moyen Ages – Temps modernes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 11–23.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter. Duke, NC: Durham University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jim, and Johnston, Stephen. 1996. The Geometry of War 1500–1750, Catalogue of the Exhibition. Oxford: University of Oxford, Museum of the History of Science.Google Scholar
Bepler, Jill. 1995. ‘Ansichten eines Staatsbegräbnisses: Funeralwerke und Diarien als Quelle zeremonieller Praxis’, in Berns, Jörgen Jochen and Rahn, Thomas (eds.) Zeremoniell als höfische Ästhetik in Spätmittelalter und Früher Neuzeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, pp. 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bérenger, Jean. 1994. A History of the Habsburg Empire 1273–1700. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Berents, Helen. 2019. ‘Apprehending the “Telegenic Dead”: Considering Images of Dead Children in Global Politics.’ International Political Sociology 13(2): 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, Dieter. 1988. ‘Imperium und Regna’, in Peter Moraw (ed.) ‘Bündnissysteme’ und ‘Außenpolitik’ im späteren Mittelalter, special issue of Zeitschrift für historische Forschung, Beiheft 5, pp. 13–37.Google Scholar
Berger, Arthur Asa. 2009. What Objects Mean: An Introduction to Material Culture. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Bergsma, Wiebe. 1994. ‘The Low Countries’, in Scribner, Bob, Porter, Roy, and Teich, Mikulás (eds.) The Reformation in National Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Paul. 2022. ‘The Intellectual Catastrophe of Vladimir Putin.’ Foreign Policy, 13 March 2022, pp. 52–58.Google Scholar
Berns, Jörgen Jochen. 1995. ‘Luthers Papstkritik als Zeremoniellkritik: Zur Bedeutung des päpstlichen Zeremoniells für das fürstliche Hofzeremoniell der Frühen Neuzeit’, in Berns, Jörgen Jochen and Rahn, Thomas (eds.) Zeremoniell als höfische Ästhetik in Spätmittelalter und Früher Neuzeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, pp. 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, Jacqueline. 2014. Governing Failure: Provisional Expertise and the Transformation of Global Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, Christopher, Hodson, Dermot, and Puetter, Uwe. 2015. ‘The New Intergovernmentalism and the Study of European Integration’, in Bickerton, Christopher J., Hodson, Dermot, and Puetter, Uwe (eds.) The New Intergovernmentalism: States and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, Christopher, Puetter, Uwe and Hudson, Dermot. 2014. ‘The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era.’ Journal of Common Market Studies 53(4): 703–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biddulph, Michael. 1994. ‘Book Review: Economies of Signs and Space: Scott Lash and John Urry, 1994, London: Sage Publications 360 pp.’ Urban Studies 31: 1786–1788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjola, Corneliu. 2018. Countering Online Propaganda and Violent Extremism: The Dark Side of Digital Diplomacy. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjola, Corneliu, and Holmes, Marcus (eds.). 2015. Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Jeremy. 1990. The Rise of the European Powers 1679–1793. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Black, Jeremy. 1996. ‘Evolution de la diplomatie anglaise de 1603 à 1793’, in Bely, Lucien (ed.) L’invention de la diplomatie – Moyen Ages – Temps modernes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 125–138.Google Scholar
Blanchet, Therese. 2011. ‘The Treaty of Lisbon: A Story in History or the Making of a Treaty.’ Fordham International Law Journal 34(5): 1217–1250.Google Scholar
Blaydes, Lisa, and Chaney, Eric. 2013. ‘The Feudal Revolution and Europe’s Rise: Political Divergence of the Christian West and the Muslim World before 1500 CE.’ American Political Science Review 107(1): 16–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleiker, Roland. 2001. ‘The Aesthetic Turn in International Political Theory.’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies 30(3): 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleiker, Roland. 2015. ‘Pluralist Methods for Visual Global Politics.’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies 43(3): 872–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleiker, Roland (ed.). 2018. Visual Global Politics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blet, Pierre. 1996. ‘La double mission du nonce auprès du roi très chrétien’, in Bely, Lucien (ed.) L’invention de la diplomatie – Moyen Ages – Temps modernes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 249–261.Google Scholar
Bloch, Marc. 2014. Feudal Society. New York: Routledge Classics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, Tanja, and Risse, Thomas. 2018. ‘From the Euro to the Schengen Crises: European Integration Theories, Politicization, and Identity Politics.’ Journal of European Public Policy 25(1): 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosbach, Franz. 1988. Monarchia Universalis: Ein politischer Leitbegriff der Frühen Neuzeit. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Bösel, Bernard, and Wiemer, Serjoscha (eds.). 2020. Affective Transformations: Politics – Algorithms – Media. Lüneburg: meson press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1989. ‘Social Space and Symbolic Power.’ Sociological Theory 7(1): 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2007. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, Wacquant, Loic, and Farage, Samar. 1994. ‘Rethinking the State: Genesis and Structure of the Bureaucratic Field.’ Sociological Theory 12(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourlanges, Jean-Louis, and Abélès, Marc. 1996. ‘Débat’, in Abélès, Marc (ed.) En attente d’Europe. Baume-les-Dames: Hachette, pp. 137–148.Google Scholar
Branch, Jordan. 2011. ‘Mapping the Sovereign State: Technology, Authority, and Systemic Change.’ International Organization 65(1): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branch, Jordan. 2012. ‘“Colonial Reflection” and Territoriality: The Peripheral Origins of Sovereign Statehood.’ European Journal of International Relations 18: 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branch, Jordan. 2014. The Cartographic State: Maps, Territory, and the Origins of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brassat, Wolfgang. 1995. ‘Monumentaler Rapport des Zeremoniells: Charles Le Bruns Tenture de l’Histoire du Roy’, in Berns, Jörgen Jochen and Rahn, Thomas (eds.) Zeremoniell als höfische Ästhetik in Spätmittelalter und Früher Neuzeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, pp. 353–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, Daniela, and Popa, Sebastian. 2018. ‘This Time It Was Different? The Salience of the Spitzenkandidaten System among European Parties.’ West European Politics 41(5): 1125–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, Rudolf. 1975. ‘Taxation, Sociopolitical Structure, and State-Building: Great Britain and Brandenburg-Prussia’, in Tilly, Charles (ed.) The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 243–327.Google Scholar
Breuilly, John. 1993. ‘Sovereignty and Boundaries: Modern State Formation and National Identity in Germany’, in Fulbrook, Mary (ed.) National Histories and European History. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, Stephen, and Wohlforth, William. 2008. World Out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American Primacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bruneau, Quentin. ‘Rethinking International Order in Early Modern Europe: Evidence from Courtly Ceremonial.’ International Organization 77(4): 691–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruter, Michael. 2009. ‘Ein Spiel von Schuldzuweisungen? Politiker, Institutionen und die europäische Identität der Bürger’, in Meyer, Thomas and Eisenberg, Johanna (eds.) Europäische Identiät als Projekt: Innen- und Aussensichten. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruun, Geoffrey. 1967. The Enlightened Despots. New York: Holt Reinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Bryant, Laurence. 1990. ‘The Medieval Entry Ceremony at Paris’, in Bak, Janos (ed.) Coronations: Medieval and Early Modern Monarchic Ritual. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 88–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueger, Christian, and Gadinger, Frank. 2014. International Practice Theory: New Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bukowansky, Mlada. 2002. Legitimacy and Power Politics: The American and French Revolutions in International Political Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulmer, S. J. 1996. ‘The European Council and the Council of the European Union: Shapers of a European Confederation.’ Publius: The Journal of Federalism 26(4): 17–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhardt, Johannes. 1998. ‘Auf dem Weg zu einer Bildkultur des Staatensystems. Der Westfälische Frieden und die Druckmedien’, Historische Zeitschrift, Beiheft, New Series, 26: 81–114.Google Scholar
Burns, Tony, and Thompson, Simon (eds.). 2013. Global Justice and the Politics of Recognition. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, H. 1966. ‘The Balance of Power’, in Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin (eds.) Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics. London: George Allen & Unwin, pp. 132–148.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry. 1993. ‘From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory.’ International Organization 47(3): 327–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Lawson, George. 2015. The Global Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Little, Richard. 1996. ‘Reconceptualizing Anarchy: Structural Realism Meets World History.’ European Journal of International Relations 2(4): 403–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Euan. 2012. The European Reformation, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, David 1998. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Canaday, John. 1972. Baroque Painters. New York: Norton Library.Google Scholar
Caporaso, James. 1996. ‘The European Union and Forms of State: Westphalian, Regulatory or Post-Modern?’ Journal of Common Market Studies 34(1): 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caporaso, James, and Tarrow, Sidney. 2009. ‘Polanyi in Brussels: Supranational Institutions and the Transnational Embedding of Markets.’ International Organization 63: 593–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carammia, Marcello, Princen, Sebastian, and Timmermans, Arco. 2016. ‘From Summitry to EU Government: An Agenda Formation Perspective on the European Council.’ Journal of Common Market Studies 54(4): 809–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, M. 2016. ‘Public–Private Partnerships in National Cyber Security Strategies.’ International Affairs 92(1): 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carstensen, Martin, and Schmidt, Vivien. 2018. ‘Power and Changing Modes of Governance in the Euro Crisis.’ Governance 31(4): 609–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, Edward. 1993. Getting Back into Place: A Renewed Understanding of the Place-World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Casey, Edward. 1997. The Fate of Place: A Philosophical History. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel. 2000. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture Volume I. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, Cornelius. 1987. The Imaginary Institution of Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
CDU/CSU. 1991. ‘Durchbruch erzielt - aber offene Fragen bleiben’, in Schmuck, Otto and Schröder, Maximilian (eds.) Der Weg zur Europäischen Union. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, pp. 26–27.Google Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik. 2010. ‘Complexity and Change in World Politics: Resurrecting Systems Theory’, in Albert, Mathias, Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Wendt, Alexander (eds.) New Systems Theories of World Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 127–157.Google Scholar
Chaloupecký, Václav. 1946. ‘Karel IV a Čechy’, in Pavel, Jakub (ed.) Vlastní Životopis Karla IV. Prague: Melantrich, pp. 5–87.Google Scholar
Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey. 2001. ‘Why Comply? Constructivism, Social Norms, and the Study of International Institutions.’ International Organization 55(3): 553–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey. 2005. ‘International Institutions and Socialization in Europe.’ Special issue of International Organization 59(4): 801–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Keith. 2013. ‘The Effect of Language on Economic Behavior: Evidence from Savings Rates, Health Behaviors, and Retirement Assets.’ American Economic Review 103(2): 690–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christiansen, Thomas. 2016. ‘After the Spitzenkandidaten: Fundamental Change in the EU’s Political System?’ West European Politics 39(5): 992–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cini, Michelle, and McGowan, Lee. 1998. Competition Policy in the European Union. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cipolla, Carlo. 1956. Money, Prices, and Civilization in the Mediterranean World, Fifth to Seventeenth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Andy. 1997. Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Andy, and Chalmers, David. 1998. ‘The Extended Mind.’ Analysis 58(1): 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Ian. 2008. Legitimacy in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian. 2009. The hierarchy of states: Reform and Resistance in the International Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian. 2011. Hegemony in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claude, Inis. 1962. Power and International Relations. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Claude, Inis. 1965. Swords into Plowshares: The Problems and Prospects of International Organization. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Antonin. 2013. ‘The Genesis of Europe: Competing Elites and the Emergence of a European Field of Power’, in Kauppi, Niilo and Madsen, Mikael Rask (eds.) Transnational Power Elites: The New Professionals of Governance, Law and Security. New York: Routledge, pp. 103–120.Google Scholar
Colgan, Jeff, and Keohane, Robert. 2017. ‘The Liberal Order Is Rigged: Fix It Now or Watch It Wither.’ Foreign Affairs 96: 36–44.Google Scholar
Collinson, Patrick. 1994. ‘England’, in Scribner, Bob, Porter, Roy, and Teich, Mikulás (eds.) The Reformation in National Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 80–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission of the European Communities. 2003. Communication from the Commission on Buildings Policy and Infrastructures in Brussels, COM(2003) 755 final, Brussels, 10.12.2003.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities. 2007. Communication from the Commission: On Policy for the Accommodation of Commission Services in Brussels and Luxembourg, COM(2007) 501, Brussels, 05.09.2007.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities. 2009. Communication from the Commission: Guide to the Commission’s Architectural Policy, C(2009) 7032 final, Brussels, 23 September 2009.Google Scholar
Constant, Monique. 1996. ‘Les traités: validité, publicité’, in Bély, Lucien (ed.) L’invention de la diplomatie – Moyen Ages – Temps modernes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 235–248.Google Scholar
Constantinou, Costas, and Der Derian, James. 2010. ‘Sustaining Global Hope: Sovereignty, Power and the Transformation of Diplomacy’, in Constantinou, Costas and Der Derian, James (eds.) Sustainable Diplomacies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooley, Alexander, and Nexon, Daniel. 2020. Exit from Hegemony: The Unraveling of the American Global Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Richard. 1998. The European Parliament’s Role in Closer EU Integration. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornett, Linda, and Caporaso, James. 1992. ‘And Still It Moves! State Interests and Social Forces in the European Community’, in Rosenau, James and Czempiel, Ernst-Otto (eds.) Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 219–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosgrove, Denis. 1989. ‘Power and Place in the Venetian Territories’, in Agnew, John and Duncan, James (eds.) The Power of Place: Bringing Together Geographical and Sociological Imaginations. Boston: Unwin Hyman, pp. 104–122.Google Scholar
Coulter, Jeff. 2001. ‘Human Practices and the Observability of the “Macro-Social”’, in Schatzki, Theodore R., Cetina, Karin Knorr, and Von Savigny, Eike (eds.) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 29–41.Google Scholar
Coyle, Diane. 2014. GDP: A Brief but Affectionate History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, Neta. 1999. Argument and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crone, Mani. 2014. ‘Religion and Violence: Governing Muslim Militancy through Aesthetic Assemblages.’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies 43(1): 291–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuneo, Pia. 1996. ‘Propriety, Property, and Politics: Joerg Breu the Elder and Issues of Iconoclasms in Reformation Augsburg.’ German History 14(1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, Simon. 2011. ‘Global Cities and the Transformation of the International System.’ Review of International Studies 37(4): 1923–1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, Claire. 2001. ‘Critical Reflections on the Westphalian Assumptions of International Law and Organization: A Crisis of Legitimacy.’ Review of International Studies 27(2): 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Estaing, Valery-Giscard. 2007. ‘Le Traité simplifié, oui, motilé, non.’ Le Monde, 15 June 2007, p. 23.Google Scholar
Daase, Christopher, Geis, Anna, Fehl, Caroline, and Kolliarkis, Georgios. 2015. Recognition in International Relations: Rethinking a Political Concept in a Global Context. Houndmills: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1957. ‘The Concept of Power.’ Behavioral Science 2(3): 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damro, Chad. 2001. ‘Building an International Identity: The EU and Extraterritorial Competition Policy.’ Journal of European Public Policy 8(2): 208–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danet, Brenda, and Katriel, Tamar. 1994. ‘Glorious Obsessions, Passionate Lovers, and Hidden Treasures: Collecting, Metaphor, and the Romantic Ethic’, in Riggins, Stephen Harold (ed.) The Socialness of Things: Essays on the Socio-Semiotics of Objects. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 23–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis Cross, Mai’a. 2007. The European Diplomatic Corps: Diplomats and International Cooperation from Westphalia to Maastricht. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dawson, Mark, and de Witte, Floris. 2013. ‘Constitutional Balance in the EU after the Euro-Crisis.’ Modern Law Review 76(5): 817–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Certeau, Michel. 1990. L’invention du quotidien: 1. arts de faire. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
De León, Fernando González. 1996. ‘“Doctors of the Military Discipline”: Technical Expertise and the Paradigm of the Spanish Soldier in the Early Modern Period.’ Sixteenth Century Journal 27(1): 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Wilde, Pieter, Leupold, Anna, and Schmidtke, Henning. 2016. ‘Introduction: The Differentiated Politicization of European Governance.’ West European Politics 39(1): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehaene, Jean-Luc. 2008. Draft Report on the Impact of the Treaty of Lisbon on the Development of the Institutional Balance of the European Union. Brussels: European Parliament, Committee on Constitutional Affairs (2008/2073(INI)).Google Scholar
Deibert, Ronald. 2000. ‘International Plug’n Play? Citizen Activism, the Internet, and Global Public Policy.’ International Studies Perspectives 1(3): 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Der Derian, James. 1987b. On Diplomacy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1992. The Other Heading: Reflections on Today’s Europe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deudney, Daniel. 2007. Bounding Power: Republican Security Theory from the Polis to the Global Village. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Deudney, Daniel, and Ikenberry, John. 1999. ‘The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order.’ Review of International Studies 25(2): 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, Karl. 1966. Nationalism and Social Communication. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Deutsche Welle. 2019. ‘EU Summit: Merkel, Macron at Odds over Top European Commission Job.’ Deutsche Welle, 28 May 2019. www.dw.com/en/eu-summit-merkel-macron-at-odds-over-top-european-commission-job/a-48919406 [last accessed 1 July 2022].Google Scholar
Devetak, Richard. 2021. ‘Reason of State’, in de Carvalho, Benjamin, Lopez, Julia Costa, and Leira, Halvard (eds.) Handbook of Historical International Relations. London: Routledge, pp. 277–288.Google Scholar
Dewald, Jonathan. 1993. Aristocratic Experience and the Origins of Modern Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicicco, Jonathan, and Levy, Jack S.. 1999. ‘Power Shifts and Problem Shifts: The Evolution of the Power Transition Research Program.’ Journal of Conflict Resolution 43(6): 675–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diez, Thomas. 1996. ‘Postmoderne und europäische Integration: Die Dominanz des Staatsmodells, die Verantwortung gegenüber dem Anderen und die Konstruktion eines alternativen Horizonts.’ Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 3(2): 255–281.Google Scholar
Dinan, Desmond. 2015. ‘Governance and Institutions: The Year of the Spitzenkandidaten.’ Journal of Common Market Studies 53(1): 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2006. ‘Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society.’ European Journal of International Relations 12(2): 139–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2009. ‘Rethinking Political Structures: From “Ordering Principles” to “Vertical Differentiation” – and Beyond.’ International Theory 1(1): 49–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2012a. ‘The Differentiation of International Societies: An Approach to Structural International Theory.’ European Journal of International Relations 18(1): 151–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2012b. ‘The Elements of the Structures of International Systems.’ International Organization 66(4): 609–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doty, Roxanne. 1993. ‘Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines.’ International Studies Quarterly 37(3): 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, William. 1978. The Old European Order 1660–1800. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Drieschova, Alena. 2017. ‘Peirce’s Semeiotics: A Methodology for Bridging the Material–Ideational Divide in IR Scholarship.’ International Theory 9(1): 33–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drieschova, Alena. 2019a. ‘Sri Lanka’s Easter Sunday Attacks Were Meant for International Audience, but Have Local Consequences.’ The Conversation, 6 June 2019. https://theconversation.com/sri-lankas-easter-sunday-attacks-were-meant-for-international-audience-but-have-local-consequences-117704 [last accessed 5 September 2022].Google Scholar
Drieschova, Alena. 2019b. ‘A Role for Phenomenology in IR Scholarship’, in J. P. Singh, Madeline Carr and Renée Marlin-Bennett (eds.) Science, Technology, and Art in International Relations. London: Routledge, pp. 19–28.Google Scholar
Drieschova, Alena. 2021. ‘In Consideration of Evolving Matters: A New Materialist Addition to Emanuel Adler’s Cognitive Evolution’, in Ish-Shalom, Piki, Kornprobst, Markus, and Pouliot, Vincent (eds.) Theorizing World Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drieschova, Alena. 2022. ‘Representants and International Orders.’ International Theory 14(2): 233–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drieschova, Alena. 2024. ‘The Social Media Revolution and Shifts in the Climate Change Discourse’, in Bjola, Corneliu and Kornprobst, Markus (eds.) Digital International Relations: Technology, Agency, and Order. London: Routledge, pp. 227–257.Google Scholar
Drieschova, Alena, Bueger, Christian, and Hopf, Ted (eds.). 2022. Conceptualizing International Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, Eamon. 1992. The Stripping of the Altars: Traditional Religion in England c. 1400–c. 1580. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dukes, Paul. 1990. The Making of Russian Absolutism, 1613–1801. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Duncan, James. 1989. ‘The Power of Place in Kandy, Sri Lanka: 1780–1980’, in Agnew, John and Duncan, James (eds.) The Power of Place: Bringing Together Geographical and Sociological Imaginations. Boston: Unwin Hyman, pp. 185–201.Google Scholar
Duque, Marina. 2018. ‘Recognizing International Status: A Relational Approach.’ International Studies Quarterly 62(3): 577–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duque, Marina. 2024. ‘Do Nuclear Weapons Confer Status?’ Book chapter presented at the Cambridge IR/History Working Group, Cambridge, 30 January 2024.Google Scholar
Duranthon, Marc. 1978. La Carte de France. Paris: Solar.Google Scholar
Durchhardt, Heinz. 1989. ‘Westfälischer Friede und internationales System im Ancien Regime.’ Historische Zeitschrift 24(3): 529–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durchhardt, Heinz. 2001. ‘Zwischenstaatliche Friedens- und Ordnungskonzepte im Ancien Régime: Idee und Realität’, in Asch, Ronald G., Voß, Wulf Eckart, and Wrede, Martin (eds.) Frieden und Krieg in der Frühen Neuzeit. Die europäische Staatenordnung und die außereuropäische Welt. Munich: Fink, pp. 37–45.Google Scholar
Duvall, Raymond, and Chowdhury, Arjun. 2011. ‘Practices of Theory’, in Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent (eds.) International Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberlein, Burkard, and Grande, Edgar. 2005. ‘Beyond Delegation: Transnational Regulatory Regimes and the EU Regulatory State.’ Journal of European Public Policy 12(1): 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Murray. 1971. Politics as Symbolic Action: Mass Arousal and Quiescence. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Edgerton, Samuel Y. 1975. The Renaissance Rediscovery of Linear Perspective. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Egel, Naomi, and Ward, Steven. 2022. ‘Hierarchy, Revisionism, and Subordinate Actors: The TPNW and the Subversion of the Nuclear Order.’ European Journal of International Relations 28(4): 751–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Ghamari, Magdalena. 2017. ‘Pro-DEASH Jihadist Propaganda. A Study of Social Media and Video Games.’ Security and Defence Quarterly 14(1): 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elden, Stuart. 2001. Mapping the Present – Heidegger, Foucault and the Project of a Spatial History. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Elden, Stuart. 2007. ‘Governmentality, Calculation, Territory.’ Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 25: 562–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elden, Stuart. 2010. ‘Land, Terrain, Territory,’ Progress in Human Geography 34(6): 799–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elden, Stuart. 2013. The Birth of Territory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 1969. Die höfische Gesellschaft: Untersuchungen zur Soziologie des Königtums und der höfischen Aristokratie mit einer Einleitung: Soziologie und Geschichtswissenschaft. Berlin: Hermann Luchterhand Verlag GmbH.Google Scholar
Epstein, Charlotte. 2011. ‘Who Speaks? Discourse, the Subject and the Study of Identity in International Politics.’ European Journal of International Relations 17(2): 327–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Charlotte. 2018. ‘The Productive Force of the Negative and the Desire for Recognition: Lessons from Hegel and Lacan.’ Review of International Studies 44(5): 805–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, Erik (ed.). 2005. Making the European Polity: Reflexive Integration in the European Union. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eriksen, Erik, and Fossum, John (eds.). 2000. Democracy in the European Union: Integration through Deliberation? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Erman, Eva. 2013. ‘The Recognitive Practices of Declaring and Constituting Statehood.’ International Theory 5(1): 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eulau, Heinz. 1942. ‘The Depersonalization of the Concept of Sovereignty.’ Journal of Politics 4(1): 3–19.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2001. European Governance: A White Paper COM(2001)428. Official Journal of the European Communities. 12.10.2001, C287/1.Google Scholar
European Commission 2012. State of the Union 2012. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_12_596 [last accessed 1 July 2022].Google Scholar
European Parliament. 2012. European Parliament Resolution of 22 November 2012 on the Elections to the European Parliament in 2014. P7_TA(2012)0462. –www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0462_EN.pdf [last accessed 1 July 2022].Google Scholar
Evans, R. J. W. 1979. The Making of the Habsburg Monarchy 1550–1700: An Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fasone, Cristina. 2014. ‘European Economic Governance and Parliamentary Representation. What Place for the European Parliament?’ European Law Journal 20(2): 164–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fausey, Caitlin M., and Boroditsky, Lera. 2010. ‘Subtle Linguistic Cues Influence Perceived Blame and Financial Liability.’ Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17(5): 644–650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FDP. 1992. ‘Europäische Union’, in Schmuck, Otto and Schröder, Maximilian (eds.) Der Weg zur Europäischen Union. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, pp. 27–28.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Yale, and Mansbach, Richard. 1996. Polities: Authority, Identities, and Change. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Yale, and Mansbach, Richard. 1999. ‘History’s Revenge and Future Shock: The Remapping of Global Politics’, in Hewson, Martin and Sinclair, Timothy (eds.) Approaches to Global Governance Theory. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 197–238.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Yale, and Mansbach, Richard. 2004. Remapping Global Politics: History’s Revenge and Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fierke, Karin. 2012. Political Self-Sacrifice: Agency, Body, and Emotion in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Financial Times. 2019. ‘Who Can Stop Manfred Weber from Becoming European Commission President?’ Financial Times, 23 May 2019. www.ft.com/content/5cb2d2e4-7d67-11e9-81d2-f785092ab560 [last accessed 1 July 2022]Google Scholar
Finer, Samuel. 1975. ‘State- and Nation-Building in Europe: The Role of the Military’, in Tilly, Charles (ed.) The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 84–163.Google Scholar
Fischer, Wolfram, and Lundgreen, Peter. 1975. ‘The Recruitment and Training of Administrative and Technical Personnel’, in Tilly, Charles (ed.) The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 456–561.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil, and Mara-Drita, Iona. 1996. ‘How to Make a Market: Reflections on the Attempt to Create a Single Market in the European Union.’ American Journal of Sociology 102(1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fossum, John. 2003. ‘The European Union: In Search of an Identity.’ European Journal of Political Theory 2(3): 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2008. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fourcade, Marion. 2009. Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franko, Mark. 2003. ‘Majestic Drag: Monarchical Performativity and the King’s Body Theatrical.’ TDR: The Drama Review 47(2): 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, Joshua. 2020. ‘Back of the Queue: Brexit, Status Loss, and the Politics of Backlash.’ British Journal of Politics and International Relations 22(4): 631–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freistein, Katja, and Gadinger, Frank. 2020. ‘Populist Stories of Honest Men and Proud Mothers: A Visual Narrative Analysis.’ Review of International Studies 46(2): 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, Howard. 2022. ‘Why the World Isn’t Really United against Russia.’ Foreign Policy, 19 April 2022, pp. 4–8.Google Scholar
Frey, Linda, and Frey, Marsha. 1993. ‘“The Reign of the Charlatans Is Over”: The French Revolutionary Attack on Diplomatic Practice.’ Journal of Modern History 65(4): 706–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrichs, Jörg. 2015. ‘An Intercultural Theory of International Relations: How Self-Worth Underlies Politics among Nations.’ International Theory 8(1): 63–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fubini, Ricardo. 1996. ‘La “residentialité” de l’ambassadeur dans le mythe et dans la réalité: une enquête sur les origines’, in Bely, Lucien (ed.) L’invention de la diplomatie – Moyen Âges – Temps modernes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 27–35.Google Scholar
Furet, François. 1978. Penser la Révolution française. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1975. Truth and Method. London: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar
Gagliardo, John. 1991. Germany under the Old Regime, 1600–1790. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Julia. 2018. ‘Misrecognition in the Making of a State: Ghana’s International Relations under Kwame Nkrumah.’ Review of International Studies 44(5): 882–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartner, Scott Sigmund. 2011. ‘On Behalf of a Grateful Nation: Conventionalized Images of Loss and Individual Opinion Change in War.’ International Studies Quarterly 55(2): 545–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartzke, Erik. 2013. ‘The Myth of Cyberwar: Bringing War in Cyberspace Back Down to Earth.’ International Security 38(2): 41–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. ‘Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture’, in The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
Gell, Alfred. 1998. Art and Agency: Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gestrich, Andreas. 1995. ‘Höfisches Zeremoniell und sinnliches Volk: Die Rechtfertigung des Hofzeremoniells im 17. und frühen 18. Jahrhundert’, in Berns, Jörgen Jochen and Rahn, Thomas (eds.) Zeremoniell als höfische Ästhetik in Spätmittelalter und Früher Neuzeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, pp. 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond. 2005. Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giesey, Ralph. 1990. ‘Inaugural Aspects of French Royal Ceremonials’, in Bak, Janos (ed.) Coronations: Medieval and Early Modern Monarchic Ritual. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gieysztor, Aleksander. 1990. ‘Gesture in the Coronation Ceremonies of Medieval Poland’, in Bak, Janos (ed.) Coronations: Medieval and Early Modern Monarchic Ritual. Berkley: University of California Press, pp. 152–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilady, Lilach. 2017. The Price of Prestige. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gill, Stephen. 1998. ‘European Governance and New Constitutionalism: Economic and Monetary Union and Alternatives to Disciplinary Neoliberalism in Europe.’ New Political Economy in Europe 3(1): 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giry-Deloison, Charles. 1995. ‘La diplomaties anglaise 1485–1603’, in Bely, Lucien (ed.) L’invention de la diplomatie – Moyen Âges – Temps modernes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 115–124.Google Scholar
Glarbo, Kenneth. 1999. ‘Wide-Awake Diplomacy: Reconstructing the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union.’ Journal of European Public Policy 6(4): 634–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Charles. 2019. ‘A Flawed Framework: Why the Liberal International Order Concept Is Misguided.’ International Security 43(4): 51–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glencross, Andrew. 2008. ‘Federalism, Confederalism, and Sovereignty Claims: Understanding the Democracy Game in the European Union’, in Adler-Nissen, Rebecca and Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas (eds.) Sovereignty Games: Instrumentalizing State Sovereignty in Europe and Beyond. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 105–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Go, Julian. 2008. ‘Global Fields and Imperial Forms: Field Theory and the British and American Empires.’ Sociological Theory 26(3): 201–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golovchenko, Yevgeniy, Hartmann, Mareike, and Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2018. ‘State Media and Civil Society in the Information Warfare over Ukraine: Citizen Curators of Digital Disinformation.’ International Affairs 94(5): 975–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorski, Philip. 2000. ‘Historicizing the Secularization Debate: Church, State, and Society in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe.’ American Sociological Review 65(1): 138–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorski, Philip, and Sharma, Vivek Saroop. 2017. ‘Beyond the Tilly Thesis: “Family Values” and State Formation in Latin Christendom’, in Kaspersen, Lars and Strandsbjerg, Jeppe (eds.) Does War Make States? Investigations of Charles Tilly’s Historical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 98–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottdiener, Mark. 1995. Postmodern Semiotics: Material Culture and the Forms of Postmodern Life. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goudge, Thomas A. 1965. ‘Peirce’s Index.’ Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 1(2): 52–70.Google Scholar
Graham, Robert. 1959. Vatican Diplomacy: A Study of Church and State on the International Plane. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grahame, Peter. 1994. ‘Objects, Texts, and Practices: The Refrigerator in Consumer Discourses between the Wars’, in Riggins, Stephen Harold (ed.) The Socialness of Things: Essays on the Socio-Semiotics of Objects. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graves-Brown, Paul. 2000. ‘Introduction’, in Graves-Brown, Paul (ed.) Matter, Materiality and Modern Culture. London: Routledge, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Greenhill, Brian. 2008. ‘Recognition and Collective Identity Formation in International Politics.’ European Journal of International Relations 14(2): 343–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grell, Ole Peter. 1988. ‘Scandinavia’, in Scribner, Bob, Porter, Roy, and Teich, Mikulás (eds.) The Reformation in National Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 111–130.Google Scholar
Guerlac, Henry. 1986. ‘Vauban: The Impact of Science on War’, in Paret, Peter (ed.) Makers of Modern Strategy: From Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 64–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulick, Edward. 1967. Europe’s Classical Balance of Power: A Case History of the Theory and Practice of One of the Great Concepts of European Statecraft. New York: Norton Library.Google Scholar
Gunitsky, Seva. 2015. ‘Corrupting the Cyber-Commons: Social Media as a Tool of Autocratic Stability.’ Perspectives on Politics 13(1): 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, S. J. 1995. ‘Henry VIII’s Foreign Policy and the Tudor Cult of Chivalry’, in Giry-Deloisen, Charles (ed.) François Ier et Henri VIII: Deux Princes de la Renaissance (1515–1547). Lille: Université Charles de Gaulle, pp. 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurevich, A. J. 1985. Categories of Medieval Culture. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, Karl. 2016. ‘Recognising Recognition through Thick and Thin: Insights from Sino-Japanese Relations.’ Cooperation and Conflict 51(3): 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano (ed.). 2012. The Return of Geopolitics in Europe? Social Mechanisms and Foreign Policy Crises. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haacke, Jürgen. 2005. ‘The Frankfurt School and International Relations: On the Centrality of Recognition.’ Review of International Studies 31(1): 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Ernest. 1958. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economical Forces 1950–1957. London: Stevens & Sons.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernest. 1968. ‘Technocracy, Pluralism, and the New Europe’, in Nye, Joseph (ed.) International Regionalism. Boston: Little Brown, pp. 62–88.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernest. 2001. ‘Does Constructivism Subsume Neo-functionalism?’ in Christiansen, Thomas, Jorgensen, Knud, and Wiener, Antje (eds.) The Social Construction of Europe. London: Sage, pp. 22–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1997. ‘Modern and Postmodern Architecture’, in Leach, Neil (ed.) Rethinking Architecture: A Reader in Cultural Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 227–235.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2001. The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hagender, Othmar. 1985. ‘Weltherrschaft im Mittelalter.’ Institut für Österreichische Geschichtsforschung, Mitteilungen 93: 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, Peter Michael. 2001. ‘Dynastische Selbstdarstellung und Militärmacht. Kriegerische Symbolik als höfische Zeichensprache in Brandenburg‐Preußen im 17. Jahrhundert’, in Asch, Ronald G., Voß, Wulf Eckart, and Wrede, Martin (eds.) Frieden und Krieg in der Frühen Neuzeit. Die europäische Staatenordnung und die außereuropäische Welt. Munich: Fink, pp. 115–138.Google Scholar
Hale, J. R. 1985. War and Society in Renaissance Europe 1450–1620. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Ian. 2017. ‘The “Revolt against the West” Revisited’, in Dunne, Tim and Reus-Smit, Christian (eds.) The Globalization of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Rodney Bruce. 1997. ‘Moral Authority as a Power Resource.’ International Organization 51(4): 591–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Rodney Bruce. 1999. National Collective Identity: Social Constructs and International Systems. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Keith, and Langhorne, Richard. 2011. The Practice of Diplomacy: Its Evolution, Theory and Administration. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hamřík, Lukáš, and Kaniok, Petr. 2019. ‘Is It all about European Democracy? The Motives behind the Institutionalisation of the Spitzenkandidaten.’ Journal of Contemporary European Research 15(4): 355–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Lene. 2006. Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hansen, Lene. 2015. ‘How Images Make World Politics: International Icons and the Case of Abu Ghraib.’ Review of International Studies 41(2): 263–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Lene, and Nissenbaum, Helen. 2009. ‘Digital Disaster, Cyber Security, and the Copenhagen School.’ International Studies Quarterly 53: 1155–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harna, Josef, and Fišer, Rudolf. 1995. Dějiny Českých Zemí: Od Pravěku do Poloviny 18. Století, Vol. I. Praha: Nakladatelství Fortuna.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Jürgen. 1988. Staatszeremoniell. Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 1996. Justice, Nature, and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Havercroft, Jonathan. 2008. ‘Sovereignty, Recognition and Indigenous Peoples’, in Price, Richard (ed.) Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 112–137.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1971. ‘Building, Dwelling, Thinking’, in Poetry, Language, Thought, trans. Hofstadter, Albert. New York: Harper & Row, pp. 143–161.Google Scholar
Hein, Carola. 2004. The Capital of Europe: Architecture and Urban Planning for the European Union. London: Praeger.Google Scholar
Héritier, Adrienne, Moury, Catherine, Schoeller, Magnus, Meissner, Katharina, and Mota, Isabel. 2015. The European Parliament as a Driving Force of Constitutionalisation. Study for the AFCO Committee. European Parliament. Directorate General for Internal Policies.Google Scholar
Heuser, Beatrice. 2010. The Evolution of Strategy: Thinking War from Antiquity to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewson, Martin. 1999. ‘Did Global Governance Create Informational Globalism?’ in Hewson, Martin and Sinclair, Timothy (eds.) Approaches to Global Governance Theory. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 97–116.Google Scholar
Hinsley, F. 1963. Power and the Pursuit of Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hix, Simon, and Høyland, Bjørn. 2013. ‘Empowerment of the European Parliament.’ Annual Review of Political Science 16: 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjorth, Frederik, and Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2019. ‘Ideological Asymmetry in the Reach of Pro-Russian Digital Disinformation to United States Audiences.’ Journal of Communication 69(2): 168–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric, and Ranger, Terence (eds.). 1983. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, John. 2012. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, John, and Sharman, Jason, 2005. ‘The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change.’ European Journal of International Relations 11(1): 63–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoeller, Maximilian. 2021. ‘The Human Component in Social Media and Fake News: The Performance of UK Opinion Leaders on Twitter during the Brexit Campaign.’ European Journal of English Studies 25(1): 80–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Alvina. 2022. ‘Voting as a Political Ritual: The Logic of Aggregation in Electoral Practice.’ Cambridge Review of International Affairs 35(1): 21–25.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Erich. 1990. ‘Coronation and Coronation Ordines in Medieval Scandinavia’, in Bak, Janos (ed.) Coronations: Medieval and Early Modern Monarchic Ritual. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Stanley. 1966. ‘Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation State and the Case of Western Europe.’ Daedalus 95: 862–915.Google Scholar
Holmes, Douglas. 2000. ‘Surrogate Discourses of Power: The European Union and the Problem of Society’, in Bellier, Irène and Wilson, Thomas (eds.) An Anthropology of the European Union: Building, Imagining and Experiencing the New Europe. Oxford: Berg, pp. 93–115.Google Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi. 1991. Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order 1648–1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi. 1992. ‘Governance without Government: Polyarchy in Nineteenth Century European International Politics’, in Rosenau, James and Czempiel, Ernst-Otto (eds.) Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 30–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi. 2002. ‘The Problem of Change in International Relations Theory’, in Ferguson, Yale and Jones, Barry (ed.) Political Space: Frontiers of Change and Governance in a Globalized World. New York: State University of New York Press, pp. 23–44.Google Scholar
Holtzmann, Robert. 1939. ‘Der Weltherrschaftsgedanke des mittelalterlichen Kaisertums und die Souveränität der europäischen Staaten.’ Historische Zeitschrift 159 (1): 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet. 2005. ‘Several Roads Lead to International Norms, but few via International Socialization: A Case Study of the European Commission.’ International Organization 59(4): 861–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary. 2001. Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary. 2007. ‘Sources of Euroscepticism.’ Acta Politica 42(2): 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary. 2009. ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus.’ British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hookway, Christopher. 1992. Peirce. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Höpel, Thomas. 2012. ‘The Versailles Model.’ European History Online (EGO). Mainz: Leibniz Institute of European History (IEG), 2012-03-22. www.ieg-ego.eu/hoepelt-2010-en [last accessed on 20 June 2014].Google Scholar
Hopf, Ted. 2018. ‘Change in International Practices.’ European Journal of International Relations 24(3): 687–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höpner, Martin, and Schäfer, Armin. 2012. ‘Embeddedness and Regional Integration: Waiting for Polanyi in a Hayekian Setting.’ International Organization 66(3): 429–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppe, Klaus. 1998. ‘Ermordung Wallensteins’, in Galen, Hans (ed.) 30jähriger Krieg, Münster und der Westfälische Frieden. Münster: Satdtmuseum Münster, p. 124.Google Scholar
Horn, D. B. 1961. The British Diplomatic Service 1689–1789. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Horn, D. B. 1967. Great Britain and Europe in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Michael. 2009. War in European History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, Andres. 1990. ‘The Origins and Descent of the Fourth Recension of the English Coronation’, in Bak, Janos (ed.) Coronations: Medieval and Early Modern Monarchic Ritual. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huju, Kira. 2022. ‘Saffronizing Diplomacy: The Indian Foreign Service under Hindu Nationalist Rule.’ International Affairs 98(2): 423–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummel, Alexandre. 2014. ‘Recognition, the Non-proliferation Regime and Proliferation Crises’, in Lindemann, Thomas and Ringmar, Erik (eds.) The International Politics of Recognition. London: Routledge, pp. 171–188.Google Scholar
Hurewitz, J.C. 1961. ‘Ottoman Diplomacy and the European State System.’ Middle East Journal 15(2): 141–152.Google Scholar
Hurrelmann, Achim, Gora, Anna, and Wagner, Andrea. 2015. ‘The Politicization of European Integration: More than an Elite Affair?’ Political Affairs 63(1): 43–59.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Emma. 2014. ‘A Global Politics of Pity? Disaster Imagery and the Emotional Construction of Solidarity after the 2004 Asian Tsunami.’ International Political Sociology 8(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, Emma. 2016. Affective Communities in World Politics: Collective Emotions after Trauma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutter, Sven, and Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2019. ‘Politicizing Europe in Times of Crisis.’ Journal of European Public Policy 26(7): 996–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, John. 2011. Liberal Leviathan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingrao, Charles. 1994. ‘Paul Schroeder’s Balance of Power: Stability or Anarchy?’ International History Review 16(4): 681–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, Jonathan. 1997. Conflicts of Empires: Spain, the Low Countries and the Struggle for World Supremacy, 1585–1713. London: The Hambledon Press.Google Scholar
Ives, Eric. 1995. ‘Anne Boleyn and the “entente évangélique”’, in Giry-Deloisen, Charles (ed.) Francçois Ier et Henri VIII: Deux Princes de la Renaissance (1515–1547). Lille: Université Charles de Gaulle, pp. 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jabko, Nicolas. 1999. ‘In the Name of the Market: How the European Commission Paved the Way for Monetary Union.’ Journal of European Public Policy 6(3): 475–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jachtenfuchs, Markus. 2001. ‘The Governance Approach to European Integration.’ Journal of Common Market Studies 39(2): 245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Patrick. 2004. ‘Hegel’s House, or “People Are States Too”.’ Review of International Studies 30: 281–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Patrick T. 2008. ‘Foregrounding Ontology: Dualism, Monism, and IR Theory.’ Review of International Studies 34(1): 129–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus, and Nexon, Daniel H.. 1999. ‘Relations before States: Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics.’ European Journal of International Relations 5(3): 291–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Robert H. 1987. ‘Quasi-States, Dual Regimes, and Neoclassical Theory: International Jurisprudence in the Third World.’ International Organization 41(4): 519–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Robert H. 2000. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. 1984. ‘Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism.’ New Left Review I(146): 53–92.Google Scholar
Jöchner, Cornelia. 1995. ‘Barockgarten und zeremonielle Bewegung: Die Möglichkeiten der Alee couverte. Oder: Wie arrangiert man ein incognito im Garten’, in Berns, Jörgen Jochen and Rahn, Thomas (eds.) Zeremoniell als höfische Ästhetik in Spätmittelalter und Früher Neuzeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, pp. 471–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Matthew. 1996. An Archaeology of Capitalism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Johnston, Alistair Iain. 2019. ‘China in a World of Orders.’ International Security 44(2): 9–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J. R. 1966. Britain and Europe in the Seventeenth Century. New York: W. W. North.Google Scholar
Joseph, Jonathan. 2010. ‘The Limits of Governmentality: Social Theory and the International.’ European Journal of International Relations 16(2): 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juncker, Jean-Claude. 2014. ‘A New Start for Europe: My Agenda for Jobs, Growth, Fairness and Democratic Change: Political Guidelines for the next European Commission.’ Strasbourg: Opening Statement in the European Parliament Plenary Session, 15 July 2014. https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2019-09/juncker-political-guidelines-speech_en.pdf [last accessed 24 November 2024].Google Scholar
Kalmo, Hent, and Skinner, Quentin. 2010. Sovereignty in Fragments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kampf, Ronit, Manor, Ilan, and Segev, Elad. 2015. ‘Digital Diplomacy 2.0? A Cross-National Comparison of Public Engagement in Facebook and Twitter.’ Hague Journal of Diplomacy 10(4): 331–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kann, Robert. 1974. A History of the Habsburg Empire 1526–1918. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst. 1957. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kassim, Hussein. 2017. ‘What’s New? A First Appraisal of the Juncker Commission.’ European Political Science 16(1): 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauppi, Niilo. 2003. ‘Bourdieu’s Political Sociology and the Politics of European Integration.’ Theory and Society 32 (5/6): 775–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelemen, Daniel R. 2019. ‘European Conservatives’ Spitzenkandidat Dilemma.’ Politico, 12 June 2019. www.politico.eu/article/manfred-weber-commission-president-european-conservatives-spitzenkandidat-dilemma/ [last accessed 1 July 2022].Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith, and Simmons, Beth. 2015. ‘Politics by Number: Indicators as Social Pressure in International Relations.’ American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Paul. 1987. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert, and Hoffmann, Stanley (eds.). 1991. The New European Community. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Kerscher, Gottfried. 1995. ‘Das mallorquinische Zeremoniell am päpstlichen Hof: Comederunt cum papa rex maioricarum…’, in Berns, Jörgen Jochen and Rahn, Thomas (eds.) Zeremoniell als höfische Ästhetik in Spätmittelalter und Früher Neuzeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, pp. 125–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, Oliver, and Herborth, Benjamin. 2013. ‘Recognition and the Constitution of Social Order.’ International Theory 5(1): 155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, Oliver, and Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2010. ‘Systems Theory beyond Explaining and Understanding’, in Albert, Mathias, Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Wendt, Alexander (eds.) New Systems Theories of World Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 23–39.Google Scholar
Kietz, Daniela, and Maurer, Andreas. 2007. ‘The European Parliament and Treaty Reform: Predefining IGCs through Interinstitutional Agreements.’ European Law Journal 13(1): 20–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Woosang. 1992. ‘Power Transitions and Great Power War: From Westphalia to Waterloo.’ World Politics 45(1): 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Anthony. 2000. ‘Thinking with Bourdieu against Bourdieu: A “Practical” Critique of the Habitus.’ Sociological Theory 18(3): 417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittelson, James. 1982. ‘The Confessional Age: The Late Reformation in Germany’, in Ozment, Steven (ed.) Reformation Europe: A Guide to Research. St. Louis, MO: Center for Reformation Research, pp. 361–381.Google Scholar
Klein, Judy. 1997. Statistical Vision in Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Robert. 1974. Sovereign Equality among States: The History of an Idea. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, Morris. 1953. Mathematics in Western Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knappett, Carl. 2005. Thinking through Material Culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochi, Tarik. 2009. The Other’s War: Recognition and the Violence of Ethics. Abingdon: Birkbeck Law Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koebner, Richard. 1961. Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kohl, Helmut. 1995. ‘Unauflöslicher Zusammenhang’, in Schmuck, Otto and Schröder, Maximilian (eds.) Der Weg zur Europäischen Union. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, p. 55.Google Scholar
Kohler, Manfred. 2014. ‘European Governance and the European Parliament: From Talking Shop to Legislative Powerhouse.’ Journal of Common Market Studies 52(3): 600–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen. 1993. ‘Westphalia and All That’, in Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert (eds.) Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 235–264.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen. 2009. Power, the State and Sovereignty: Essays on IR. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen. 2010. ‘The Durability of Organized Hypocrisy’, in Kalmo, Hent and Skinner, Quentin (eds.) Sovereignty in Fragments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 96–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1986. ‘Of Systems, Boundaries, and Territoriality: An Inquiry into the Formation of the State System.’ World Politics 39(1): 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreppel, Amie. 1999. ‘The European Parliament’s Influence over EU Policy Outcomes.’ Journal of Common Market Studies 37(3): 521–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2014. ‘The Populist Challenge.’ West European Politics 37(2): 361–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krippendorf, Ekkhardt. 2000. ‘Die Erfindung der Außenpolitik’, in Siegelberg, Jens and Schlichte, Klaud (eds.) Strukturwandel Internationaler Beziehungen: zum Verhältnis von Staat und internationalem System seit dem Westfälischen Frieden. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Kurowska, Xymena, and Reshetnikov, Anatoly. 2018. ‘Neutrollization: Industrialized Trolling as a Pro-Kremlin Strategy of Descuritization.’ Security Dialogue 49(5): 345–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kustermans, Jorg, Svensson, Ted, Lopez, Julia Costa, Blasenheim, Tracey, and Hoffmann, Alvina. 2022. ‘Ritual and Authority in World Politics.’ Cambridge Review of International Affairs 35(1): 2–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe, Chantal. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laffey, Mark, and Weldes, Jutta. 1997. ‘Beyond Belief: Ideas and Symbolic Technologies in the Study of International Relations.’ European Journal of International Relations 3(2): 193–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David, Martin, Lisa, and Risse, Thomas. 2021. ‘Challenges to the Liberal International Order: Reflections on International Organization.’ International Organization 75(S2): 225–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langins, Janis. 2004. Conserving the Enlightenment: French Military Engineering from Vauban to the Revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Latham, Andrew. 2012. Theorizing Medieval Geopolitics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, John. 1999. ‘Materialities, Spatialities, Globalities.’ Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK. www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/resources/sociology-online-papers/papers/law-hetherington-materialities-spatialities-globalities.pdf. [last accessed 24 November 2024].Google Scholar
Le Goff, Jacques. 1990. ‘A Coronation Program for the Age of Saint Louis: The Ordo of 1250’, in Bak, Janos (ed.) Coronations: Medieval and Early Modern Monarchic Ritual. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leander, Anna. 2017. ‘Digital/Commercial (In)Visibility: The Politics of DAESH Recruitment Videos.’ European Journal of Social Theory 20(3): 348–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned. 2008. A Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri. 2009. The Production of Space, trans. Nicholson-Smith, Donald. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Legg, Catherine. 2008. ‘The Problem of the Essential Icon.’ American Philosophical Quarterly 45(3): 207–232.Google Scholar
Leguey-Feilleux, Jean-Robert. 2009. The Dynamics of Diplomacy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1996. ‘Language and Space.’ Annual Review of Anthropology 25: 353–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Archibald. 1974. Knights and Samurai: Feudalism in Northern France and Japan. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jeffrey. 2003. ‘Informal Integration and the Supranational Construction of the Council.’ Journal of European Public Policy 10(6): 996–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Jeffrey. 2005. ‘The Janus Face of Brussels: Socialization and Everyday Decision Making in the European Union.’ International Organization 59(4): 937–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ley, David. 1989. ‘Modernism, Post-Modernism and the Struggle for Place’, in Agnew, John and Duncan, James (eds.) The Power of Place: Bringing Together Geographical and Sociological Imaginations. Boston: Unwin Hyman, pp. 44–65.Google Scholar
Lindemann, Thomas, and Ringmar, Erik (eds.). 2014. The International Politics of Recognition. New York: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Lindsay, Jon. 2013. ‘Stuxnet and the Limits of Cyber Warfare.’ Security Studies 22(3): 365–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linklater, Andrew. 1998. The Transformation of Political Community. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Liszka, James Jakob. 1996. A General Introduction to the Semeiotic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, Christopher, and Beetham, David. 2001. ‘Legitimizing the EU: Is There a “Post-Parliamentary Basis” for Its Legitimation?’ Journal of Common Market Studies 39(3): 443–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luard, Evan. 1992. The Balance of Power: The System of International Relations, 1648–1815. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lücke, Ulrich. 1991. ‘Vor einem historischen Gipfel.’ General-Anzeiger, 9 December 1991.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 1975. ‘Political Ritual and Social Integration.’ Sociology 9(2): 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupovici, Amir. 2023. ‘Ontological Security, Cyber Technology, and States’ Responses.’ European Journal of International Relations 29(1): 153–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M’Closkey, Kathy. 1994. ‘Navajo Weaving as Sacred Metaphor’, in Riggins, Stephen Harold (ed.) The Socialness of Things: Essays on the Socio-Semiotics of Objects. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico. 1993. ‘The European Community between Social Policy and Social Regulation.’ Journal of Common Market Studies 31(2): 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico. 2001. ‘Two Logics of Delegation: Agency and Fiduciary Relations in EU Governance.’ European Union Politics 2(1): 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malettke, Klaus. 1996. ‘L’ “équilibre” européen face à la “monarchia universalis”: Les réactions européennes aux ambitions hégémoniques à l’époque moderne’, in Bely, Lucien (ed.) L’invention de la diplomatie – Moyen Âges – Temps modernes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, Moran. 2020. ‘“Making Our Country Great Again”: The Politics of Subjectivity in an Age of National-Populism.’ International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 33: 451–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, Michael. 2012a. The Sources of Social Power, Volume I, A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael. 2012b. The Sources of Social Power: Volume 2, The Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Manners, Ian. 2000. Substance and Symbolism. An Anatomy of Cooperation in the New Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Manor, Ilan. 2019. The Digitalization of Public Diplomacy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marin, Louis. 1988. Portrait of the King. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, Gyoergy. 2009. ‘Identität und Konfliktlinien in Europa – eine ungarische Sicht’, in Meyer, Thomas and Eisenberg, Johanna (eds.) Europäische Identität als Projekt: Innen- und Außensichten. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maronitis, Kostas. 2021. ‘The Present Is a Foreign Country: Brexit and the Performance of Victimhood.’ British Politics 16: 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Hannah, and Drieschova, Alena. 2018. ‘Post-Truth Politics and the UK’s Brexit Referendum.’ New Perspectives 26(3): 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martill, Benjamin, and Steiger, Uta. 2021. ‘Negotiating Brexit: The Cultural Sources of British Hard Bargaining.’ Journal of Common Market Studies 59(2): 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattingly, Garrett. 1963. Renaissance Diplomacy. London: Butler & Tanner.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. 1936. ‘Les Techniques du corps.’ Journal de Psychologie XXXII(3–4), 15 mars–15 avril 1936.Google Scholar
McCoy, Richard. 1990. ‘“The Wonderful Spectacle”: The Civic Progress of Elizabeth I and the Troublesome Coronation’, in Bak, Janos (ed.) Coronations: Medieval and Early Modern Monarchic Ritual. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHugh, James. 2012. Sandalwood and Carrion: Smell in Indian Religion and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, Kathleen. 2015. The Politics of Everyday Europe: Constructing Authority in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, William. 1982. The Pursuit of Power: Technology, Armed Force, and Society Since A.D. 1000. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meissner, Katerina, and Schoeller, Magnus. 2019. ‘Rising despite the Polycrisis? The European Parliament’s Strategies of Self-Empowerment after Lisbon.’ Journal of European Public Policy 26(7): 1075–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melissen, Jan, and Wang, Jian (eds.). 2019. Debating Public Diplomacy: Now and Next. Wageningen: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menchi, Silvana Seidel. 1988. ‘Italy’, in Scribner, Bob, Porter, Roy, and Teich, Mikulás (eds.) The Reformation in National Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 181–201.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, Barak. 2005. ‘Sovereignty under Attack: The International Society Meets the Al Qaeda Network.’ Review of International Studies 31(1): 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mérand, Frédéric. The Political Commissioner: A European Ethnography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2002. Phenomenology of Perception. New York: Routledge Classics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merlingen, Michael. 2006. ‘Foucault and World Politics: Promises and Challenges of Extending Governmentality Theory to Europe and Beyond.’ Millennium – Journal of International Studies 35(1): 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Christopher. 1999. ‘Political Legitimacy and the Invisibility of Politics: Exploring the European Union’s Communication Deficit.’ Journal of Common Market Studies 37(4): 617–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Thomas. 2009. ‘Europäische Identität’, in Meyer, Thomas and Eisenberg, Johanna (eds.) Europäische Identität als Projekt: Innen- und Aussensichten. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalski, Segiusz. 1993. The Reformation and the Visual Arts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Middleton, Charles Ronald. 1977. The Administration of British Foreign Policy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mieck, Ilja. 1996. ‘La diplomatie classique à l’épreuve: Les rencontres princières avec Pierre Ier de Russie’, in Bely, Lucien (ed.) L’invention de la diplomatie – Moyen Âges – Temps modernes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 319–329.Google Scholar
Miller, Daniel. 2005. ‘Materiality: An Introduction’, in Miller, Daniel (ed.) Materiality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 1–50.Google Scholar
Miller, Manjari Chatterjee. 2013. Wronged by Empire: Post-Imperial Ideology and Foreign Policy in India and China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milliken, Jennifer. 1999. ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods.’ European Journal of International Relations 5(2): 225–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milward, Alan. 1992. The European Rescue of the Nation-State. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. 2002. Rule of Experts. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. 2005. ‘The Work of Economics: How a Discipline Makes Its World.’ European Journal of Sociology 46(2): 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. 2008. ‘Rethinking Economy.’ Geoforum 39: 1116–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitterrand, Francois. 1991. ‘Ein wirklicher Erfolg.’ Frankreich-Info, 37/1991, 18 December 1991.Google Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer. 2005. ‘Reading Habermas in Anarchy: Multilateral Diplomacy and Global Public Spheres.’ American Political Science Review 99(3): 401–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer. 2006. ‘Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma.’ European Journal of International Relations 12(3): 341–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer. 2013. Power in Concert: The Nineteenth-Century Origins of Global Governance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modelski, George. 1978. ‘The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation State.’ Comparative Studies in Society and History 20(2): 214–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möller, Ulrika. 2007. The Prospects of Security Cooperation: A Matter of Relative Gains or Recognition. Goeteborg: Goeteborg Studies in Politics.Google ScholarPubMed
Monteiro, Nuno. 2014. Theory of Unipolar Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravscik, Andrew. 1991. ‘Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community.’ International Organization 45(1): 19–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1993. ‘Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach.’ Journal of Common Market Studies 31(4): 473–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Moravscik, Andrew. 2007. ‘The European Constitutional Settlement’, in McNamara, Kathleen and Meunier, Sophie (eds.) Making History: European Integration and Institutional Change at 50. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–50.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans. 1985. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Mori, Jennifer. 2010. The Culture of Diplomacy: Britain in Europe, c. 1750–1830, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Mukerji, Chandra. 1997. Territorial Ambitions and the Gardens of Versailles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Rohan. 2022. Ascending Order: Rising Powers and the Politics of Status in International Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Alexander. 1996. ‘The Sovereign State System as Political-Territorial Ideal: Historical and Contemporary Considerations’, in Biersteker, Thomas and Weber, Cynthia (eds.) State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 81–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Michelle. 2018. The Struggle for Recognition in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musgrave, Paul, and Nexon, Daniel. 2018. ‘Defending Hierarchy from the Moon to the Indian Ocean: Symbolic Capital and Political Dominance in Early Modern China and the Cold War.’ International Organization 72(3): 591–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nair, Janaki. 2002. ‘Past Perfect: Architecture and Public Life in Bangalore.’ Journal of Asian Studies 61(4): 1205–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naylor, Tristen. 2019. Social Closure and International Society: Status Groups from the Family of Civilised Nations to the G20. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver. 1999. Uses of the Other: ‘The East’ in European Identity Formation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver. 2004. ‘Beware of Organicism: The Narrative Self of the State.’ Review of International Studies 30: 259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Iver. 2008. ‘Discourse Analysis’, in Klotz, Audie and Prakash, Deepa (eds.) Qualitative Methods of International Relations: A Pluralist Guide. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Iver. 2010. ‘Sustainability and Transformation in Diplomatic Culture: The Case of Eurocentrism’, in Constantinou, Costas and Der Derian, James (eds.) Sustainable Diplomacies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 128–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Iver. 2011. ‘Entry into International Society Reconceptualised: The Case of Russia.’ Review of International Studies 37(2): 463–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Iver, and Pouliot, Vincent. 2011. ‘Untimely Russia: Hysteresis in Russian-Western Relations over the Past Millennium.’ Security Studies 20: 105–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Iver, and Sending, Ole Jacob. 2010. Governing the Global Polity: Practice, Mentality, Rationality. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nexon, Daniel. 2009. The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neyer, Jürgen. 2003. ‘Discourse and Order in the EU: A Deliberative Approach to Multi-level Governance.’ Journal of Common Market Studies 41(4): 687–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolson, Harold. 1954. The Evolution of Diplomatic Method. London: Constable.Google Scholar
Noury, Abdul, and Roland, Gérard. 2002. ‘More Power to the European Parliament.’ Economic Policy 17(35): 279–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Malley, John W. 1982. ‘Catholic Reform’, in Ozment, Steven (ed.) Reformation Europe: A Guide to Research. St. Louis, MO: Center for Reformation Research, pp. 297–319.Google Scholar
Oakley, Francis. 2010. Empty Bottles of Gentilism. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Oakley, Francis. 2012. The Mortgage of the Past. London: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, Francis. 2015. The Watershed of Modern Politics. London: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organski, Abramo. 1958. World Politics, 2nd ed. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas. 1994. The States System of Europe, 1640–1990. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osiander, Andreas. 2001a. ‘Sovereignty, International Relations and the Westphalian Myth.’ International Organization 55 (2): 251–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osiander, Andreas. 2001b. ‘Before Sovereignty: Society and Politics in Ancien Régime Europe.’ Review of International Studies 27: 119–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osiander, Andreas. 2007. Before the State: Systemic Political Change in the West from the Greeks to the French Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Österle, Günter. 1995. ‘Die Kaiserkrönung Napoleons: Eine ästhetische und ideologische Instrumentalisierung’, in Berns, Jörgen Jochen and Rahn, Thomas (eds.) Zeremoniell als höfische Ästhetik in Spätmittelalter und Früher Neuzeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, pp. 632–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ott, Joachim. 1995. ‘Vom Zeichencharakter der Herrscherkrone: Krönungszeremoniell und Krönungsbild im Mittelalter: Der Mainzer Ordo und das Sakramentar Heinrichs II’, in Berns, Jörgen Jochen and Rahn, Thomas (eds.) Zeremoniell als höfische Ästhetik in Spätmittelalter und Früher Neuzeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, pp. 534–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, Patricia. 2015. Economy of Force: Counterinsurgency and the Historical Rise of the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozouf, Mona. 1976. La Fête révolutionnaire, 1789–1799. Paris: Gallimard.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palan, Ronen. 2002. ‘Offshore and the Institutional Environment of Globalization’, in Ferguson, Yale and Jones, Barry (ed.) Political Space: Frontiers of Change and Governance in a Globalized World. New York: State University of New York Press, pp. 211–224.Google Scholar
Palmer, Robert Roswell. 1986. ‘Frederick the Great, Guibert, Buelow: From Dynastic to National War’, in Paret, Peter (ed.) Makers of Modern Strategy: From Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 91–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panofsky, Erwin. 1951. Gothic Architecture and Scholasticism. Latrobe, PA: Archabbey Press.Google Scholar
Panofsky, Erwin. 1980. ‘Die Perspektive als symbolische Form’, in Hariolf, Oberer and Verheyen, Egon (eds.) Aufsätze zu Grundfragen der Kunstwissenschaft. Berlin: Verlag Volher Spieß, pp. 99–167.Google Scholar
Pansardi, Pamela, and Battegazzorre, Francesco. 2018. ‘The Discursive Legitimation Strategies of the President of the Commission: A Qualitative Content Analysis of the State of the Union Addresses (SOTEU).’ Journal of European Integration 40(7): 853–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Seo-Hyun. 2017. Sovereignty and Status in East Asian International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Craig. 2006. A Certain Idea of Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Paul, Darel. 1999. ‘Sovereignty, Survival, and the Westphalian Blind Alley in International Relations.’ Review of International Studies 25: 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, T. V., Larson, Deborah, and Wohlforth, William (eds.). 2014. Status in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedeo, Dan. 1976. Geometry and the Liberal Arts. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Peñalver García, Nereo, and Priestley, Julian. 2015. The Making of a European President. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Genevieve. 1945. ‘II. Political Inequality at the Congress of Vienna.’ Political Science Quarterly 60(4): 532–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, John. 2015. ‘The Commission and the New Intergovernmentalism: Calm within the Storm?’ in Bickerton, Christopher J., Hodson, Dermot, and Puetter, Uwe (eds.) The New Intergovernmentalism: States and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 185–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Andrew. 2010. ‘The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Jihadism – Transnational Religious Insurgencies and the Transformation of International Orders.’ Review of International Studies 36(2): 257–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Andrew. 2011. War, Religion, and Empire: The Transformation of International Orders. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Andrew. 2014. ‘The Islamic State’s Challenge to International Order.’ Australian Journal of International Affairs 68(5): 495–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Andrew, and Reus-Smit, Christian. 2020. Culture and Order in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Andrew, and Sharman, Jason. 2015. International Order in Diversity: War, Trade, and Rule in the Indian Ocean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philpott, Daniel. 2000. ‘The Religious Roots of Modern International Relations.’ World Politics 52(2): 206–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philpott, Daniel. 2001. Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pickering, Andrew. 2001. ‘Practice and Posthumanism: Social Theory and a History of Agency’, in Schatzki, Theodore R, Cetina, Karin Knorr, and Von Savigny, Eike (eds.) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 163–174.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1996. ‘The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis.’ Comparative Political Studies 29(2): 123–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinelli, Cesare. 2013. ‘The Discourses on Post-National Governance and the Democratic Deficit Absent an EU Government.’ European Constitutional Law Review 9(2): 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirenne, Henri. 1962. Economic and Social History of Medieval Europe. New York: Polygraphyc Company.Google Scholar
PIS (Pražská informační služba). 2000a. Korunovační klenoty. Prague: Pražská informační služba.Google Scholar
PIS (Pražská informační služba). 2000b. Chrám Sv. Víta. Prague: Pražská informační služba.Google Scholar
PIS (Pražská informační služba). 2000c. Pražské barokní paláce a jejich umělecká výydoba. Prague: Pražská informační služba.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1972. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press. 2001 edition.Google Scholar
Pollack, Mark. 2003. The Engines of European Integration: Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollak, Johannes, and Slominski, Peter. 2015. ‘The European Parliament: Adversary or Accomplice of the New Intergovernmentalism?’, in Bickerton, Christopher J, Hodson, Dermot, and Puetter, Uwe (eds.) The New Intergovernmentalism: States and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polleroß, Friedrich. 1995. ‘Des abwesenden Prinzen Porträt: Zeremonielldarstellung im Bildnis und Bildnisgebrauch im Zeremoniell’, in Berns, Jörgen Jochen and Rahn, Thomas (eds.) Zeremoniell als höfische Ästhetik in Spätmittelalter und Früher Neuzeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, pp. 382–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, Sheldon. 2006. The Language of the Gods in the World of Men: Sanskrit, Culture, and Power in Premodern India. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Patrick. 2020. The False Promise of Liberal Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Pötter, Herbert. 1998. ‘Einzug des Gesandten Adriaen Pauw in Münster’, in Galen, Hans (ed.) 30jähriger Krieg, Münster und der Westfälische Frieden. Münster: Satdtmuseum Münster, p. 9.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent. 2010. ‘The Materials of Practice: Nuclear Warheads, Rhetorical Commonplaces and Committee Meetings in Russian–Atlantic relations.’ Cooperation and Conflict 45(3): 294–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pounds, Norman. 1990. An Historical Geography of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prigogine, Ilya, and Stengers, Isabelle. 1984. Order out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. London: New Science Library.Google Scholar
Puetter, Uwe. 2012. ‘Europe’s Deliberative Intergovernmentalism: The Role of the Council and European Council in EU Economic Governance.’ Journal of European Public Policy 19(2): 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puetter, Uwe. 2014. The European Council and the Council: New Intergovernmentalism and Institutional Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puetter, Uwe. 2015. ‘The European Council: The Centre of New Intergovernmentalism’, in Bickerton, Christopher J., Hodson, Dermot, and Puetter, Uwe (eds.) The New Intergovernmentalism: States and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pütz, Christine, and van de Rakt, Eva. 2019. ‘European Elections 2019: Learning from Mistakes.’ Heinrich Böll Stiftung, 16 August 2019. https://eu.boell.org/en/2019/08/16/european-elections-2019-learning-mistakes-made [last accessed 1 July 2022].Google Scholar
Queller, Donald. 1967. The Office of Ambassador in the Middle Ages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul. 2006. Une France Si Moderne: Naissance du Social 1800–1950. Paris: Buchet/Chastel.Google Scholar
Rai, Shirin, and Johnson, Rachel. 2014. Democracy in Practice: Ceremony and Ritual in Parliament. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rajkovic, Nikolas. 2010. ‘“Global Law” and Governmentality: Reconceptualizing the “Rule of Law” as Rule “through” Law.’ European Journal of International Relations 18(1): 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, Ronald. 1980. ‘Historical Links between Cartography and Art.’ Geographical Review 70(1): 60–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, Audrey. 2018. ‘Mobilising Bodies, Narrating Security: Tourist Choreographies at Jerusalem’s Holocaust History Museum.’ Mobilities 13(2): 216–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiding, Hilde, and Meijer, Fons. 2019. ‘This Time It’s Different – The European Lead Candidate Procedure of 2014 and Its Historical Background.’ Parliaments, Estates and Representation 39(1): 64–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinle, Adolf. 1976. Zeichensprache der Architektur: Symbol, Darstellung und Brauch in der Baukunst des Mittelalters und der Neuzeit. Zürich: Verlag für Architektur Artemis.Google Scholar
Renshon, Jonathan. 2016. ‘Status Deficits and War.’ International Organization 70(3): 513–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 1999. The Moral Purpose of the State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2011. ‘Obligation through Practice.’ International Theory 3(2): 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2013a. Individual Rights and the Making of the International System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2013b. ‘The Concept of Intervention.’ Review of International Studies 39(5): 1057–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2013c. ‘The Liberal International Order Reconsidered’, in Friedman, Rebekka, Oskanian, Kevork, and Ramon Pacheco, Pardo (eds.) After Liberalism? The Future of Liberalism in International Relations. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 167–186.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2017. ‘Cultural Diversity and International Order.’ International Organization 71(4): 851–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revel, Jacques. 1991. ‘Knowledge of the Territory.’ Science in Context 4(1): 133–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Susan. 1997. Kingdoms and Communities in Western Europe 900–1300, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Ingrid, and Third, Amanda. 2009. ‘Cultural Phenomenology and the Material Culture of Mobile Media’, in Vannini, Phillip (ed.) Material Culture and Technology in Everyday Life: Ethnographic Approaches. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 145–156.Google Scholar
Richefort, Isabelle. 1996. ‘Présents diplomatiques et diffusion de l’image de Louis XIV’, in Bely, Lucien (ed.) L’invention de la diplomatie – Moyen Âges – Temps modernes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 263–279.Google Scholar
Riggins, Stephen Harold. 1994a. ‘Introduction’, in Riggins, Stephen Harold (ed.) The Socialness of Things: Essays on the Socio-Semiotics of Objects. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggins, Stephen Harold. 1994b. ‘Fieldwork in the Living Room: An Autoethnographic Essay’, in Riggins, Stephen Harold (ed.) The Socialness of Things: Essays on the Socio-Semiotics of Objects. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 101–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringmar, Erik. 1996. Identity, Interest and Action: A Cultural Explanation of Sweden’s Intervention in the Thirty Years War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringmar, Erik. 2012. ‘Performing International Systems: Two East-Asian Alternatives to the Westphalian Order.’ International Organization 66(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringmar, Erik. 2014. ‘Recognition and the Origins of International Society.’ Global Discourse 4(4): 446–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2001. ‘A European Identity? Europeanization and the Evolution of Nation-State Identities’, in Cowles, Maria, Caporaso, James, and Risse, Thomas (eds.) Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 198–216.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2004. ‘Social Constructivism and European Integration’, in Wiener, Antje and Diez, Thomas (eds.) Europe: an Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 159–176.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, and Engehnann-Martin, Daniela. 2002. ‘Identity Politics and European Integration. The Case of Germany’, in Pagden, Anthony (ed.) The Idea of Europe. From Antiquity to the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 287–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittberger, Berthold. 2001. ‘Which Institutions for Europe? Explaining the Institutional Design of Europe’s First Community.’ Journal of European Public Policy 8: 673–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittberger, Berthold. 2012. ‘Institutionalizing Representative Democracy in the European Union: The Case of the European Parliament.’ Journal of Common Market Studies 50(1): 18–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittberger, Berthold, and Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2006. ‘Explaining the Constitutionalization of the European Union.’ Journal of European Public Policy 13(8): 1148–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Michael. 1968. The Early Vasas: A History of Sweden, 1523–1611. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roosen, William James. 1976. The Age of Louis XIV: The Rise of Modern Diplomacy. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.Google Scholar
Roothenberg, Gunther. 1986. ‘Maurice of Nassau, Gustavus Adolphus, Raimondo Montecuccoli, and the “Military Revolution” of the Seventeenth Century’, in Paret, Peter (ed.) Makers of Modern Strategy: From Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 32–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenau, James. 1979. ‘Muddling, Meddling and Modelling: Alternative Approaches to the Study of World Politics in an Era of Rapid Change.’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies 8(2): 130–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Andrew. 2020. ‘The Power of Viral Expression in World Politics’, in Koschut, Simon (ed.) The Power of Emotions in World Politics. London: Routledge, pp. 166–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, George. 2011. The European Union and Its Crises: Through the Eyes of the Brussels Elite. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John. 1982. ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order.’ International Organization 36(2): 379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John. 1986. ‘Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis’, in Keohane, Robert (ed.) Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 131–157.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John. 1993. ‘Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations.’ International Organization 47(1): 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sack, Robert David. 1986. Human Territoriality: Its Theory and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saever, Paul. 1982. ‘The English Reformation’, in Ozment, Steven (ed.) Reformation Europe: A Guide to Research. St. Louis, MO: Center for Reformation Research, pp. 271–296.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Peter. 1989. Boundaries: The Making of France and Spain in the Pyrenees. Berkeley: University of California PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salgo, Eszter. 2017. Images from Paradise: The Visual Communication of European Union’s Federalist Utopia. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Saltman, Michael. 1987. ‘Feudal Relationships and the Law.’ Comparative Studies in Society and History 29(3): 514–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne, and Sweet, Alec Stone (eds.). 1998. European Integration and Supranational Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. 2006. Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Satow, Ernest. 2011. A Guide to Diplomatic Practice. Volume I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz. 1994. ‘Community and Autonomy: Multi-level Policy Making in the European Union.’ Journal of European Public Policy 1(2): 219–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore. 2001a. ‘Introduction: Practice Theory’, in Schatzki, Theodore, Cetina, Karin Knorr, and Von Savigny, Eike (eds.) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore. 2001b. ‘Practice Mind-ed Orders’, in Schatzki, Theodore, Cetina, Karin Knorr, and Von Savigny, Eike (eds.) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 42–55.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2003. The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe: Rules and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schivelbusch, Wolfgang.1986. The Railway Journey: The Industrialization of Time and Space in the 19th Century. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schmid, Christian. 2005. Stadt. Raum und Gesellschaft: Henri Lefebvre und die Theorie der Produktion des Raumes. München: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien. 2018. ‘Politicizing in the EU: Between National Politics and EU Political Dynamics.’ European Public Policy 26(7): 1018–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Olivier. 2020. ‘How to Challenge an International Order: Russian Diplomatic Practices in Multilateral Security Organisations.’ European Journal of International Relations 26(3): 922–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe. 2000. How to Democratize the European Union … and Why Bother? London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe. 2004. ‘Neo-functionalism’, in Wiener, Antje and Diez, Thomas (eds.) European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 45–74.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Paul. 1992. ‘Did the Vienna Settlement Rest on a Balance of Power?’ American Historical Review 97(3): 683–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Paul. 1994. The Transformation of European Politics 1763–1848. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schueth, Sam. 2010. ‘Assembling International Competitiveness: The Republic of Georgia, USAID, and the Doing Business Project.’ Economic Geography 87(1): 51–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütte, Ulrich. 1995. ‘Höfisches Zeremoniell und sakraler Kult in der Architektur des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts: Ansätze zu einem strukturellen Vergleich’, in Berns, Jörgen Jochen and Rahn, Thomas (eds.) Zeremoniell als höfische Ästhetik in Spätmittelalter und Früher Neuzeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, pp. 410–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James. 2002. ‘A Networked Space of Meaning? Spatial Politics as Geostrategies of European Integration.’ Space and Polity 6(2): 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scribner, Bob. 1994. ‘Introduction’, in Scribner, Bob, Porter, Roy, and Teich, Mikulás (eds.) The Reformation in National Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. 2010. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sending, Ole Jacob, and Neumann, Iver. 2011. ‘Banking on Power: How Some Practices in an International Organization Anchor Others’, in Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent (eds.) International Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 231–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senior, Carl, Stewart, Patrick, Bucy, Erik, and Lee, Nick. 2021. ‘Performance, Politics and Boris Johnson’s Brexit.’ Frontiers in Psychology 12: 1–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sewell, William. 1996. ‘Historical Events as Transformations of Structures: Inventing Revolution at the Bastille.’ Theory and Society 25: 841–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shamieh, Luna, and Szenes, Zoltan. 2015. ‘The Propaganda of ISIS/DEASH through the Virtual Space.’ Defence against Terrorism Review 7(1): 7–31.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Michael. 1994. ‘Moral Geographies and the Ethics of Post-Sovereignty.’ Public Culture 6: 479–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Aradhana, and Gupta, Akhil. 2006. The Anthropology of the State: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Sheehan, James. 1989. German History 1770–1866. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sherlock, Peter. 2005. ‘Henry VII’s “Miraculum Orbis” Royal Commemoration at Westminster Abbey 1500–1700’, in Kent, F. W. and Zika, Charles (eds.) Rituals, Images, and Words: Varieties of Cultural Expression in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, pp. 175–199.Google Scholar
Shields, Rob. 1994. ‘The Logic of the Mall’, in Riggins, Stephen Harold (ed.) The Socialness of Things: Essays on the Socio-Semiotics of Objects. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 203–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shore, Chris. 2011. ‘European Governmentality? The European Commission and the Future of Democratic Government.’ European Law Journal 17(3): 287–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Short, T. L. 1996. ‘Interpreting Peirce’s Interpretant: A Response to Lalor, Liszka and Meyers.’ Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 32(4): 488–541.Google Scholar
Short, T. L.. 2004. ‘The Development of Peirce’s Theory of Signs’, in Misak, Cheryl (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Peirce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 214–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Short, T. L.. 2007. Peirce’s Theory of Signs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieberson, Stephen. 2004. ‘The Proposed European Union Constitution – Will It Eliminate the EU’s Democratic Deficit?’ Columbia Journal of European Law 10(2): 173–264.Google Scholar
Simms, Brendan. 2017. Britain’s Europe: A Thousand Years of Conflict and Cooperation. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Simpson, Gerry. 2009. Great Powers and Outlaw States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Timothy. 1999. ‘Synchronic Global Governance and the International Political Economy of the Commonplace’, in Hewson, Martin and Sinclair, Timothy (eds.) Approaches to Global Governance Theory. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 157–172.Google Scholar
Singer, David, and Small, Melvin. 1966. ‘The Composition and Status Ordering of the International System: 1815–1940.’ World Politics 18(2): 236–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjursen, Helene. 2006. ‘The European Union as a “Normative Power”: How Can This Be?’ Journal of European Public Policy 13(2): 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skagestad, Peter. 2004. ‘Peirce’s Semeiotic Model of the Mind’, in Misak, Cheryl (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Peirce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 2002. Visions of Politics, Volume I: Regarding Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 2010. ‘The Sovereign State: A Genealogy’, in Kalmo, Hent and Skinner, Quentin (eds.) Sovereignty in Fragments: The Past, Present, and Future of a Contested Concept. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluga, Glen. 2021. The Invention of International Order: Remaking Europe after Napoleon. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Claire, Burke, Heather, de Leiuen, Cherrie, and Jackson, Gary. 2016. ‘The Islamic State’s Symbolic War: Da’esh’s Socially Mediated Terrorism as a Threat to Cultural Heritage.’ Journal of Social Archaeology 16(2): 164–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. K. 2008. The Cartographic Imagination in Early Modern England: Re-writing the World in Marlow, Spenser, Raleigh and Marvell. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Smith, Mary Elizabeth. 2018. ‘De Facto State Foreign Policy “Social Moves” in Abkhazia and South Ossetia.’ Iran & the Caucasus 22(2): 181–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer-Mathis, Andrea. 1995. ‘Theatrum und Ceremoniale: Rang- und Sitzordnungen bei theatralischen Veranstaltungen am Wiener Kaiserhof im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert’, in Berns, Jörgen Jochen and Rahn, Thomas (eds.) Zeremoniell als höfische Ästhetik in Spätmittelalter und Früher Neuzeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, pp. 511–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, Georg. 2011. A Liberal World Order in Crisis: Choosing between Imposition and Restraint. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sorrell, Kory Spencer. 2004. Representative Practices: Peirce, Pragmatism and Feminist Epistemology. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Sotiriou, Stylianos. 2019. ‘The Irreversibility of History.’ Problems of Post-Communism 66(3): 172–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SPD. 1991. ‘Reaktion der SPD’, in Schmuck, Otto and Schröder, Maximilian (eds.) Der Weg zur Europäischen Union. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, p. 27.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 1994. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 2017. ‘War and State Formation: Amending the Bellicist Theory of State Making’, in Kaspersen, Lars Bo and Strandsbjerg, Jeppe (eds.) Does War Make States? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statham, Paul, and Trenz, Hans-Jörg. 2013. ‘How EU Politicization Can Emerge through Contestation: The Constitution Case.’ Journal of Common Market Studies 51(5): 965–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, Brent. 2017. ‘Recognising, and Realising, the Promise of the Aesthetic Turn.’ Millennium Journal of International Studies 45(2): 206–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiger, Heinhard. 1998. ‘Der Westfälische Frieden: Grundgesetz für Europa?’ Historische Zeitschrift, Beiheft, New Series 26: 33–80.Google Scholar
Stepanova, Ekaterina. 2008. ‘South Ossetia and Abkhazia: Placing the Conflict in Context.’ SIPRI Policy Brief. Solna: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, November 2008.Google Scholar
Stirk, Peter. 2012. ‘The Westphalian Model and Sovereign Equality.’ Review of International Studies 38(3): 641–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoller, Paul. 1989. The Taste of Ethnographic Things: The Senses in Anthropology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec, and Sandholtz, Wayne. 1998. ‘Integration, Supranational Governance, and the Institutionalization of the European Polity’, in Sandholtz, Wayne and Stone Sweet, Alec (eds.) European Integration and Supranational Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Strang, David. 1996. ‘Contested Sovereignty: The Social Construction of Colonial Imperialism’, in Biersteker, Thomas and Weber, Cynthia (eds.) State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 22–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strange, Susan. 1996. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stripple, Johannes, and Bulkeley, Harriet. 2013. Governing the Climate: New Approaches to Rationality, Power and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strömbom, Lisa. 2014. ‘Thick Recognition: Advancing Theory on Identity Change in Intractable Conflicts.’ European Journal of International Relations 20(1): 168–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturdy, David. 1990. ‘“Continuity” versus “Change”: Historians and English Coronations of the Medieval and Early Modern Periods’, in Bak, Janos (ed.) Coronations: Medieval and Early Modern Monarchic Ritual. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 228–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Shogo. 2008. ‘Seeking “Legitimate” Great Power Status in Post-Cold War International Society: China’s and Japan’s Participation in UNPKO.’ International Relations 22(1): 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Tomo. 2003. ‘The Epistemology of Macroeconomic Reality: The Keynesian Revolution from an Accounting Point of View.’ Accounting, Organization and Society 28: 471–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svendsen, Øyvind. 2022. ‘Theorizing Public Performances for International Negotiations.’ International Studies Quarterly 66(3): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swidler, Ann. 2001. ‘What Anchors Cultural Practices’, in Schatzki, Theodore R., Cetina, Karin Knorr, and Von Savigny, Eike (eds.) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 74–92.Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas. 2000. ‘The Anatomy of Autonomy: An Institutional Account of Variation in Supranational Influence.’ Journal of Common Market Studies 38(5): 834–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas. 2006. Leadership and Negotiation in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina. 1999. ‘The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use.’ International Organization 53(3): 433–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 2004. Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teffer, Peter. 2018. ‘Spitzenkandidat System Here to Stay, MEPs Warn Capitals.’ EUobserver, 23 January 2018. https://euobserver.com/eu-political/140656 [last accessed 1 July 2022].Google Scholar
Teschke, Benno. 1998. ‘Geopolitical Relations in the European Middle Ages: History and Theory.’ International Organization 52(2): 325–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teschke, Benno. 2003. The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics and the Making of Modern International Relations. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Thevenot, Laurent. 2001. ‘Pragmatic Regimes Governing the Engagement with the World’, in Schatzki, Theodore R., Cetina, Karin Knorr, and Von Savigny, Eike (eds.) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 56–73.Google Scholar
Thompson, Ian. 2006. The Sun King’s Garden: Louis XIV, André Le Nôtre and the Creation of the Gardens of Versailles. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Thompson, John. 1984. Studies in the Theory of Ideology. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, William. 2014. ‘Status Conflict, Hierarchies, and Interpretation Dilemmas’, in Paul, T. V, Larson, Deborah, and Wohlforth, William (eds.) Status in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Janice. 1994. Mercenaries, Pirates, and Sovereigns: State-Building and Extraterritorial Violence in Early Modern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1975. ‘Reflections on the History of European State-Making’, in Tilly, Charles (ed.) The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–83.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1990. Coercion, Capital and European States, AD 990–1990. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tömmel, Ingeborg, and Verdun, Amy. 2017. ‘Political Leadership in the European Union: An Introduction.’ Journal of European Integration 39(2): 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Towns, Ann, and Rumelili, Bahar. 2017. ‘Taking the Pressure: Unpacking the Relation between Norms, Social Hierarchies, and Social Pressures on States.’ European Journal of International Relations 23(4): 756–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Towns, Ann. 2010. Women and States: Norms and Hierarchies in International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traub, James. 2022. ‘The West Is Reborn.’ Foreign Policy, 18 April 2022: 14–15.Google Scholar
Treaty of Lisbon. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A12007L%2FTXT [last accessed 24 August 2022].Google Scholar
Treaty on European Union. 1992. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A12012M%2FTXT [last accessed 24 August 2022].Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George, and Garrett, Geoffrey. 2001. ‘The Institutional Foundations of Intergovernmentalism and Supranationalism in the European Union.’ International Organization 55(2): 357–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Stephen. 1994. The Social Theory of Practices: Tradition, Tacit Knowledge and Presuppositions. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Ullmann, Walter. 1949. ‘The Development of the Medieval Idea of Sovereignty.’ English Historical Review 64(250): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urry, John. 2003. Global Complexity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Vagts, Alfred. 1948. ‘The Balance of Power: Growth of an Idea.’ World Politics 1(1): 82–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valeriano, Brendon, and Maness, Ryan. 2015. Cyber War Versus Cyber Realities: Cyber Conflict in the International System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Engen, John. 1986. ‘The Christian Middle Ages as an Historiographical Problem.’ American Historical Review 91: 519–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ham, Peter. 2010. Social Power in International Politics. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Middelaar, Luuk, 2019. Alarums & Excursions: Improvising Politics on the European Stage, translated by Liz Waters. Newcastle upon Tyne: Agenda Publishing.Google Scholar
Vastokas, Joan. 1994. ‘Are Artifacts Texts? Lithuanian Woven Sashes as Social and Cosmic Transactions’, in Riggins, Stephen Harold (ed.) The Socialness of Things: Essays on the Socio-Semiotics of Objects. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 337–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viola, Lora Anne. 2020. The Closure of the International System: How Institutions Create Political Equalities and Hierarchies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, Toby. 2014. ‘Juncker Nomination Runs into Opposition.’ EuropeanVoice, 28 May 2014.Google Scholar
Von Weizsäcker, Richard. 1995. ‘Meilenstein Maastricht’, in Schmuck, Otto and Schröder, Maximilian (eds.) Der Weg zur Europäischen Union. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, p. 19.Google Scholar
Waever, Ole. 1995. ‘Securitization and Desecuritization’, in Lipschutz, Ronnie (ed.) On Security. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 46–86.Google Scholar
Walker, Christopher. 2016. ‘The Authoritarian Threat: The Hijacking of “Soft Power”.’ Journal of Democracy 27(1): 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, Helen. 2002. ‘The Council: An Institutional Chameleon?’ Governance 15(3): 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, William. 2002. ‘The Power of Inscription: Beyond Social Construction and Deconstruction in European Integration Studies.’ Millennium – Journal of International Studies 31(1): 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, William. 2022. ‘Resistance as Power’, in Drieschova, Alena, Burger, Christian, and Hopf, Ted (eds.) Conceptualizing International Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 122–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, William, and Haahr, Jens Henrik, 2005. Governing Europe: Discourse, Governmentality and European Integration. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walther, Helmut G. 1988. ‘Der westliche Mittelmeerraum in der zweiten Hälfte des 13. Jahrhunderts als politisches Gleichgewichtssystem’, in Peter Moraw (ed.) ‘Bündnissysteme’ und ‘Außenpolitik’ im späteren Mittelalter. Special issue of Zeitschrift für historische Forschung, Beiheft 5, pp. 39–67.Google Scholar
Walton, Guy. 1986. Louis XIV’s Versailles. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1967. ‘On the Role of Symbolism in Political Thought.’ International Studies Quarterly 82(2): 191–204.Google Scholar
Ward, Steven. 2017. Status and the Challenge of Rising Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Adam. 1992. The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber, Cynthia. 1995. Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, the State and Symbolic Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Webster, Charles. 1963. The Congress of Vienna. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph. 1981. ‘The Community System: the Dual Character of Supranationalism.’ Yearbook of European Law 1(1): 267–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, Joseph. 1994. ‘Fin de siècle Europe’, in Dehouse, Renaud (ed.) Europe after Maastricht: An Ever Closer Union? München: Becks, pp. 203–216.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph. 2001. ‘Federalism without Constitutionalism: Europe’s Sonderweg’, in Nicolaidis, Kalypso and Howse, Robert (eds.) The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, Gilbert, and Wodak, Ruth. 2000. ‘Debating Europe: Globalization Rhetoric and European Union Employment Policies’, in Bellier, Irène and Wilson, Thomas (eds.) An Anthropology of the European Union: Building, Imagining and Experiencing the New Europe. Oxford: Berg, pp. 75–92.Google Scholar
Weiss, Jessica Chen, and Wallace, Jeremy. 2021. ‘Domestic Politics, China’s Rise, and the Future of the Liberal International Order.’ International Organization 75(S2): 635–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 2000. ‘On the Via Media: A Response to the Critics.’ Review of International Studies 26: 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 2003. ‘Why a World State Is Inevitable.’ European Journal of International Relations 9(4): 491–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 2004. ‘The State as Person in International Theory.’ Review of International Studies 30: 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, K. F. 1965. ‘Das hochmittelalterliche Imperium im politischen Bewusstsein Frankreichs (10.–12. Jahrhundert).’ Historische Zeitschrift 200(1): 1–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessels, Wolfgang. 2014. ‘Differentiation of the Governance in the European Union and Challenges of Democratic Legitimacy.’ Challenges in Constitutional Affairs in the New Term: Taking Stock and Looking Forward, Workshop for the AFCO Committee, 6 November 2014, pp. 38–47.Google Scholar
Westlake, Martin. 1999. The Council of the European Union. London: John Harper.Google Scholar
Westlake, Martin. 2016. Chronicle of an Election Foretold: The Longer-Term Trends Leading to the ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ Procedure and the Election of Jean-Claude Juncker as European Commission President. LSE ‘Europe in Question’ Discussion Paper Series, 102/2016.Google Scholar
White, James. 1964. The Origins of Modern Europe. New York: Horizon Press Publishers.Google Scholar
White, John. 1987. The Birth and Rebirth of Pictorial Space. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Wickham, Chris. 2017. Medieval Europe. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wight, Colin. 2004. ‘State Agency: Social Action without Human Activity?’ Review of International Studies 30: 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wight, Martin. 1966. ‘The Balance of Power’, in Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin (eds.) Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics. London: George Allen & Unwin, pp. 149–175.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin. 1977. Systems of States. Bristol: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael. 2018. ‘International Relations in the Age of the Image.’ International Studies Quarterly 62(4): 880–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2001. Philosophical Investigations. The German Text, with a Revised English Translation, translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolf, John. 1951. The Emergence of the Great Powers 1685–1715. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.Google Scholar
Wolf, John. 1970. Toward a European Balance of Power 1620–1715. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company.Google Scholar
Wolf, Reinhard. 2011. ‘Respect and Disrespect in International Politics: The Significance of Status Recognition.’ International Theory 3(1): 105–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, David. 1985. ‘Reality, Symbolism, Time, and Space in Medieval World Maps.’ Annals of the Association of American Geographers 75(4): 510–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolley, Reginald Maxwell. 1915. Coronation Rites. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Woosang, Kim. 1995. ‘Power Transitions and Great Power War from Westphalia to Waterloo.’ World Politics 45: 153–172.Google Scholar
Wydra, Harald. 2015. Politics and the Sacred. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynen, Arthur. 1922. Die Päpstliche Diplomatie. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder & Co. G.m.b.H. Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Zaiotti, Ruben. 2011. ‘Performing Schengen: Myths, Rituals and the Making of European Territoriality beyond Europe.’ Review of International Studies 37(2): 537–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarakol, Ayse. 2011. After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Zarakol, Ayse. 2022. Before the West: The Rise and Fall of Eastern World Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeidel, Ronen, and al-Hashimis, Hisham. 2019. ‘A Phoenix from the Ashes? Daesh after Its Territorial Losses in Iraq and Syria.’ Perspectives on Terrorism 13(3): 32–43.Google Scholar
Zielinski, Dominik. 2009. ‘Garden Complex of the Herrenchiemsee Palace. Presentations of Versailles.’ Rocznik Historii Sztuki 34: 109–133.Google Scholar
Zielonka, Jan. 2007. Europe as Empire: The Nature of the Enlarged European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel. 2003. ‘Awe or Envy: Herder contra Kant on the Sublime.’ The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 61(3): 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 2019. ‘Politicization Compared: At National, European, and Global Levels.’ Journal of European Public Policy 26(7): 977–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Alena Drieschova, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Representants and International Orders
  • Online publication: 15 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009575850.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Alena Drieschova, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Representants and International Orders
  • Online publication: 15 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009575850.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Alena Drieschova, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Representants and International Orders
  • Online publication: 15 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009575850.011
Available formats
×