Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T09:10:32.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - ‘Learning to Say “No” in Different Ways’

Tracking EFL Learner Performance and Perceptions of Pragmatics Instruction in Mexico

from Part II - Instructed Pragmatics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2022

By
Elizabeth Flores-Salgado  and
Nicola Halenko
Edited by
Nicola Halenko  and
Jiayi Wang
Nicola Halenko
Affiliation:
University of Central Lancashire, Preston
Jiayi Wang
Affiliation:
De Montfort University, Leicester
Get access

Summary

This quasi-experimental study tracks the efficacy of a planned explicit intervention with an EFL learner group in Mexico, using the under-researched speech act of refusals as the pragmatic target. Thirty university students were recruited to an Experimental (N=15) or Control group (N=15) to measure instructional effects of a ten-hour training programme which employed a pre-test, post-test design. Performance results were enhanced with semi-structured interviews to identify learners’ cognitive processes when producing refusals and their perceptions of the pragmatics training. The findings revealed the pragmatic instruction facilitated more elaborate refusals which showed increased sensitivity to sociopragmatic aspects. Both the frequency and variety of indirect strategies and adjuncts were markedly different to those produced by their non-instructed counterparts. This positive trend in the quantitative findings was also corroborated in the qualitative data. The interview data highlighted the instructed group’s cognitive processes when carrying out the pragmatic tasks and showed the learners’ planning and thought processes when performing refusals were different before and after receiving instruction.

Keywords

Mexican EFL learnersrefusalstechnologyexplicit instruction
Type
Chapter
Information
Pragmatics in English Language Learning , pp. 173 - 199
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, Z. (2014). Using film to provide a context for teaching L2 pragmatics. System, 46, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcón Soler, E. (2012). Teachability and bilingualism effects on third language learners’ pragmatic knowledge. Intercultural Pragmatics, 9, 511–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcón Soler, E., & Guzmán-Pitarch, J. (2010). The effect of instruction on learners’ pragmatic awareness: A focus on refusals. International Journal of English Studies, 10, 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcón-Soler, E., & Guzmán-Pitarch, J. (2013). The effect of instruction on learners’ use and negotiation of refusals. Utrecht Studies in Language & Communication, 25, 41–63.Google Scholar
Allami, H., & Naeimi, A. (2011) A cross-linguistic study of refusals: An analysis of pragmatic competence development in Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2015). Designing instructional effect studies for L2 pragmatics: A guide for teachers and researchers. In Gesuato, S., Bianchi, F., & Cheng, W. (eds.), Teaching, Learning and Investigating Pragmatics: Principles, Methods and Practices. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 135–164.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2017). Acquisition of L2 pragmatics. In Loewen, S. & Sato, M. (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge, pp. 224–245.Google Scholar
Bardovi Harlig, K., & Hartford, B. (1993). Learning the rules of academic talk: A longitudinal study of pragmatic change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 279–304.Google Scholar
Beebe, L., Takahashi, T., & Uliss-Weltz, R. (1990). Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In Scarcella, R., Andersen, E., & Krashen, S. (eds.), Developing Communicative Competence in a Second Language. New York: Newbury House, pp. 55–73.Google Scholar
Bella, S. (2011). Mitigation and politeness in Greek invitation refusals: effects of length of residence in the target community and intensity of interaction on non-native speakers’ performance. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 1718–1740.Google Scholar
Bella, S. (2014). Developing the ability to refuse: A cross-sectional study of Greek FL refusals. Journal of Pragmatics, 61, 35–62.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals of Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byon, A. S. (2004). Sociopragmatic analysis of Korean requests: Pedagogical settings. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1673–1704.Google Scholar
Covarrubias, P. (2002). Culture, Communication, and Communication: Interpersonal Relations and Pronominal Address in a Mexican Organization. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Derakhshan, A., & Eslami-Rasekh, Z. (2015). The effect of consciousness-raising instruction on the pragmatic development of apology and request. TESLEJ, 18, 1–24.Google Scholar
Economidou-Kogetsidis, M., & Halenko, N. (2022). Developing spoken requests during UK study abroad: A longitudinal look at Japanese learners of English. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education, 7(1), 23–53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Eslami-Rasekh, A., & Mardani, M. (2010). Investigating the effects of teaching apology speech act, with a focus on intensifying strategies, on pragmatic development of EFL learners: The Iranian context. The International Journal of Language Society and Culture, 30, 96–103.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, C. (2003). Validity in data collection methods in pragmatics research. In Kempehinsky, P. & Piñeros, C. E. (eds.), Theory, Practice, and Acquisition. Papers from the 6th Hispanic Linguistic Symposium and the 5th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 239–257.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, C. (2008a). Politeness in Mexico and the United States: A Contrastive Study of the Realizations and Perceptions of Refusals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, C. (2008b). Perceptions of refusals to invitations: exploring the minds of foreign language learners. Language Awareness, 17, 195–211.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, C. (2009). Estado de la cuestión sobre el discurso de la (des) cortesía y la imagen social en México. In Alfano Rodríguez, L. (ed.), La (des) cortesía y la imagen social en México: Estudios semiótico discursivos desde varios enfoques analíticos. Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León. Monterrey: Universidad de Nuevo León, pp. 15–46.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M., & Houck, N. (1999). Interlanguage Refusals: A Cross-Cultural Study of Japanese-English. New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1967). Interactional Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Halenko, N. (2018). Using computer-assisted language learning (CALL) tools to enhance output practice. In Jones, C. (ed.), Practice in Second Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 137–163.Google Scholar
Halenko, N. (2021). Teaching Pragmatics and Instructed Second Language Acquisition. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halenko, N., & Flores-Salgado, E. (2019). Embedding ICT to teach and assess the pragmatic targets of refusals and disagreements in spoken English. British Council ELT Research Papers, 19(3), 1–21.Google Scholar
Halenko, N., & Jones, C. (2011). Teaching pragmatic awareness of spoken requests to Chinese EAP learners in the UK: Is explicit instruction effective? System, 39, 240–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halenko, N., & Jones, C. (2017). Explicit instruction of spoken requests: an examination of pre-departure instruction and L2 contact in the study abroad environment. System 68, 26–37.Google Scholar
Halenko, N., Jones, C., Davies, L., & Davies, J. (2019). Surveying pragmatic performance during a study abroad stay: A cross-sectional look at the language of spoken requests. Intercultural Communication Education, 2(2), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, N. (2010). Incorporating technology into pragmatics-focused instruction. In Ishihara, N. & Cohen, A. D. (eds.), Teaching and Learning Pragmatics: Where Language and Culture Meet. London: Routledge, pp. 244–263.Google Scholar
Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D. (2010). Teaching and Learning Pragmatics: Where Language and Culture Meet. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kondo, S. (2008). Effects on pragmatic development through awareness-raising instruction: Refusals by Japanese EFL learners. In Alcón Soler, E. & Martínez-Flor, A. (eds.), Investigating Pragmatics in Foreign Language Learning, Teaching and Testing. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 153–178.Google Scholar
Kwon, J. (2004). Expressing refusals in Korean and in American English. Multilingua, 23(4), 339–364.Google Scholar
Liao, Ch., & Bresnahan, M. (1996). A contrastive pragmatic study on American English and Mandarin refusal strategies. Language Sciences, 18(3–4), 703–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Flor, A. (2011). Analysing request modification devices in films: Implications for pragmatic learning in instructed foreign language contexts. In Alcón Soler, E. & Safont Jordà, M. P. (eds.), Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 245–280.Google Scholar
Martínez-Flor, A. (2016). Teaching apology formulas at the discourse Level: Are instructional effects maintained over time? ELIA, 16, 13–48.Google Scholar
Martínez-Flor, A., & Usó-Juan, E. (2010). Speech Act Performance: Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nelson, G., Carson, J., Al Batal, M., & El Bakary, W. (2002). Cross‐cultural pragmatics: Strategy use in Egyptian Arabic and American English refusals. Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 163–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Zhuang, J. (2019). A meta-analysis of L2 pragmatics instruction. In Taguchi, N. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of SLA and Pragmatics. New York: Routledge, pp. 297–307.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. (eds.), Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–101.Google Scholar
Rose, K. (2000). An exploratory cross-sectional study of interlanguage pragmatic development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(1), 27–67.Google Scholar
Schauer, G. (2009). Interlanguage Pragmatic Development: The Study Abroad Context. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2001). Intercultural Communication, 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48, 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Sykes, J. M. (2013). Technology in Interlanguage Pragmatics Research and Teaching. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Takahashi, T., & Beebe, L.M. (1987). The development of pragmatic competence by Japanese learners of English. JALT Journal, 8, 131–155.Google Scholar
Turnbull, W. (2001). An appraisal of pragmatic elicitation techniques for the social psychological study of talk: The case of request refusals. Journal of Pragmatics, 11(1), 31–61.Google Scholar
Turnbull, W., & Saxton, K. (1997). Modal expressions as facework in refusals to comply with requests: I think I should say ‘no’ right now. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 145–181.Google Scholar
Usó-Juan, E. (2010). Requests: A sociopragmatic approach. In Martínez-Flor, A. & Usó-Juan, E. (eds.), Speech Act Performance: Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 237–256.Google Scholar
Usó-Juan, E. (2013). Effects of metapragmatic instruction on EFL learners’ production of refusals. In Martí-Arandiz, O. & Salazar Campillo, P. (eds.), Refusals in Instructional Contexts and Beyond. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 65–101.Google Scholar
Van Der Bom, I., & Mills, S. (2015). A discursive approach to the analysis of politeness data. Journal of Politeness Research, 11(2), 179–206.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×