The Textual Record

Part I - The Textual Record

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 October 2025

Edited by

Merja Kytö and

Erik Smitterberg

Show author details

Merja Kytö: Affiliation:
Uppsala Universitet, Sweden
Erik Smitterberg: Affiliation:
Uppsala Universitet, Sweden

Book contents

Get access

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The New Cambridge History of the English Language
Documentation, Sources of Data and Modelling
, pp. 25 - 356

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009205443 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Anderson, John and Britton, Derek. 1998. The orthography and phonology of the Ormulum. English Language and Linguistics 3: 299–334.10.1017/S1360674399000258CrossRef Google Scholar

Bell, Allan. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13: 145–204.10.1017/S004740450001037XCrossRef Google Scholar

Benskin, Michael and Laing, Margaret. 1981. Translation and Mischsprachen in Middle English manuscripts. In Benskin, Michael and Samuels, Michael L. (eds.), So Meny People Longages and Tonges: Philological Essays in Scots and Medieval English Presented to Angus McIntosh. Edinburgh: M. Benskin and M. L. Samuels, pp. 55–106.Google Scholar

Campbell, Alistair. 1959. Old English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carroll, Ruth, Peikola, Matti, Salmi, Hanna, Varila, Mari-Liisa, Skaffari, Janne and Hiltunen, Risto. 2013. Pragmatics on the page: visual text in late medieval English books. European Journal of English Studies 17.1: 54–71.10.1080/13825577.2013.755006CrossRef Google Scholar

Chiesa, Paolo. 2020. The genealogical method: principles and practice. In Roelli, Philipp (ed.), Handbook of Stemmatology: History, Methodology, Digital Approaches. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton, pp. 74–87.Google Scholar

Clanchy, M. T. 2013. From Memory to Written Record: England 1066–1307. Third edition. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Colgrave, Bertram and Hyde, Ann. 1962. Two recently discovered leaves from Old English manuscripts. Speculum 37.1: 60–78.10.2307/2850599CrossRef Google Scholar

Da Rold, Orietta. 2020. Paper in Medieval England: From Pulp to Fictions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108886536CrossRef Google Scholar

Evans, Melanie. 2016. ‘By the Queen’: collaborative authorship in scribal correspondence of Queen Elizabeth I. In Daybell, James and Gordon, Andrew (eds.), Women and Epistolary Agency in Early Modern Culture, 1450–1600. London: Routledge, pp. 36–55.Google Scholar

Faulkner, Mark. 2011. Archaism, belatedness and modernisation: ‘Old’ English in the twelfth century. Review of English Studies 63(259): 179–203.Google Scholar

Fröhlich, Walter. 1990. The Letters of Saint Anselm of Canterbury. Kalamazoo: Cistercian Publications.Google Scholar

Fulk, Robert D. 2016. Philological methods. In Kytö, Merja and Pahta, Päivi (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 95–108.10.1017/CBO9781139600231.007CrossRef Google Scholar

Gameson, Richard. 2002. The Scribe Speaks? Colophons in Early English Manuscripts. Cambridge: Department of Anglo-Saxon, Norse and Celtic.Google Scholar

Gameson, Richard. 2012. Anglo-Saxon scribes and scriptoria. In Gameson, Richard (ed.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain. Vol. 1: c.400–1100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 94–120.Google Scholar

Garmonsway, G. N. (ed.). 1991. Ælfric’s Colloquy. Exeter: Exeter University Press.Google Scholar

Gullick, Michael. 1998. Professional scribes in eleventh- and twelfth-century England. English Manuscript Studies 1100–1700 7: 1–24.Google Scholar

Gwara, Scott. 1996. Drypoint glossing in a tenth-century manuscript of Aldhelm’s Prose Treatise on Virginity. Traditio 51: 99–145.10.1017/S0362152900013386CrossRef Google Scholar

Hernández-Campoy, Juan M. and García-Vidal, Tamara. 2018. Style-shifting and accommodative competence in Late Middle English written correspondence: putting Audience Design to the test of time. Folia Linguistica Historica 39.2: 383–420.Google Scholar

Hogg, Richard M. 2002. An Introduction to Old English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Johannesson, Nils-Lennart. 1995. Old English versus Old Norse vocabulary in the Ormulum: the choice of third person plural personal pronouns. In Melchers, Gunnel and Warren, Beatrice (eds.), Studies in Anglistics. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International, pp. 171–80.Google Scholar

Johannesson, Nils-Lennart and Cooper, Andrew (eds.). 2023. Ormulum: Edited from Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Junius I and London, Lambeth Palace Library, MS 783. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the Early English Text Society.Google Scholar

Ker, Neil R. 1957. Catalogue of Manuscripts Containing Anglo-Saxon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Koopman, Willem F. 1992. The study of Old English syntax and the Toronto Dictionary of Old English. Neophilologus 76: 605–615.10.1007/BF00209877CrossRef Google Scholar

Kwakkel, Erik. 2011. Commercial organisation and economic innovation. In Wakelin, Daniel and Gillespie, Alexandra (eds.), The Production of Books in England 1350–1500. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 173–191.10.1017/CBO9780511976193.010CrossRef Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Laing, Margaret. 1988. Dialectal analysis and linguistically composite texts in Middle English. Speculum 63: 83–103.10.2307/2854323CrossRef Google Scholar

Laing, Margaret. 2004. Multidimensionality: time, space and stratigraphy in historical dialectology. In Dossena, Marina and Lass, Roger (eds.), Methods and Data in English Historical Dialectology. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 49–93.Google Scholar

Laing, Margaret and Lass, Roger. 2009. Shape-shifting, sound change and the genesis of prodigal writing systems. English Language and Linguistics 13.1: 1–31.10.1017/S1360674308002840CrossRef Google Scholar

Lass, Roger. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In Blake, Norman (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. 2: 1066–1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 23–155.10.1017/CHOL9780521264754.003CrossRef Google Scholar

Lyall, R. J. 1989. Materials: the paper revolution. In Griffiths, Jeremy and Pearsall, Derek (eds.), Book Production and Publishing in Britain 1375–1475. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–31.Google Scholar

McIntosh, Angus. 1956. The analysis of written Middle English. Transactions of the Philological Society 55: 26–55.Google Scholar

McIntosh, Angus. 1974. Towards an inventory of Middle English scribes. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 75: 602–624.Google Scholar

Angus, McIntosh, Samuels, Michael L. and Benskin, Michael. 1986. A Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar

Merritt, Herbert Dean. 1945. Old English Glosses (A Collection). New York: Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Bruce and Robinson, Fred C.. 1996. A Guide to Old English. Fifth edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Möhlig-Falke, Ruth. 2015. Using the dictionary of Old English Corpus for linguistic analyses: a basic classification of the textual sources. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 116.2: 395–420.Google Scholar

Nichols, Stephen. 1990. Introduction: philology in a manuscript culture. Speculum 65.1: 1–10.Google Scholar

Orton, Peter. 2000. The Transmission of Old English Poetry. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar

Overty, Joanne Filippone. 2008. The cost of doing scribal business: prices of manuscript books in England, 1300–1483. Book History 11: 1–32.Google Scholar

Pons-Sanz, Sara M. 2015. Norse-derived terms in Orm’s lexico-semantic field of emotion. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology 114.4: 552–586.Google Scholar

Robinson, Fred C. 1973. Syntactical glosses in Latin manuscripts of Anglo-Saxon provenance. Speculum 48.3: 443–475.10.2307/2854443CrossRef Google Scholar

Robinson, Pamela R. 1978. Self-contained units in composite manuscripts of the Anglo-Saxon period. Anglo-Saxon England 7: 231–238.10.1017/S0263675100002957CrossRef Google Scholar

Rowley, Sharon M. 2004. Nostalgia and the rhetoric of lack: the missing exemplar for Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, Manuscript 41. In Lionarons, Joyce Tally (ed.), Old English Literature in Its Manuscript Context. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press, pp. 11–35.Google Scholar

Rumble, Alexander R. 2009. The construction and writing of Anglo-Saxon manuscripts. In Owen-Crocker, Gale R. (ed.), Working with Anglo-Saxon Manuscripts. Exeter: Exeter University Press, pp. 29–60.Google Scholar

Scase, Wendy. 2019. The LALME typology of scribal practice: some issues for manuscript studies. In Stenroos, Merja, Mäkinen, Martti, Thengs, Kjetil V. and Traxel, Oliver M. (eds.), Current Explorations in Middle English. Berlin: Peter Lang, pp. 13–34.Google Scholar

Schiegg, Markus. 2016. Scribes’ voices: the relevance and types of early medieval colophons. Studia Neophilologica 88.2: 129–147.Google Scholar

Seiler, Annina. 2014. The Scripting of the Germanic Languages: A Comparative Study of ‘Spelling Difficulties’ in Old English, Old High German and Old Saxon. Zurich: Chronos.Google Scholar

Seiler, Annina. 2021. Germanic names, vernacular sounds, and Latin spellings in early Anglo-Saxon and Alemannic charters. In Gallagher, Robert, Roberts, Edward and Tinti, Francesca (eds.), The Languages of Early Medieval Charters: Latin, Germanic Vernaculars, and the Written Word. Leiden: Brill, pp. 117–153.Google Scholar

Smith, Jeremy. 1996. An Historical Study of English: Function, Form and Change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Stork, Nancy Porter. 1990. Through a Gloss Darkly: Aldhelm’s Riddles in the British Library MS Royal 12.C.xxiii. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar

Sweet, Henry. 1897. First Steps in Anglo-Saxon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Wakelin, Daniel. 2014. Scribal Correction and Literary Craft: English Manuscripts 1375–1510. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Waldispühl, Michelle and Wallis, Christine. 2023. Personal names in medieval libri vitæ as a sociolinguistic resource. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 9.1: 129–161.10.1515/jhsl-2021-0020CrossRef Google Scholar

Wallis, Christine. 2013a. Layers of reading in the Old English Bede: the case of Oxford Corpus Christi College 279B. In Jucker, Andreas H., Landert, Daniela, Seiler, Annina and Studer, Nicole (eds.), Meaning in Words, Texts and Discourse in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 19–38.Google Scholar

Wallis, Christine. 2013b. The Old English Bede: Transmission and Textual History in Anglo-Saxon Manuscripts. University of Sheffield. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/5459.Google Scholar

Wallis, Christine. 2016. Unpublished dry-point annotations in a manuscript of the Old English Bede: Oxford, Corpus Christi College 279B. Medium Ævum 85.1: 15–32.Google Scholar

Webber, Teresa. 2020. Where were books made and kept? In Da Rold, Orietta and Treharne, Elaine (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Medieval British Manuscripts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 214–236.Google Scholar

Wenisch, Franz. 1979. Spezifisces anglisches Wortgut in den nordhumbrischen Interlinearglossierungen des Lukasevangeliums. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

Wieland, Gernot Rudolf. 1983. The Latin Glosses on Arator and Prudentius in Cambridge University Library MS GG.5.35. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar

Wright, Laura. 2000. Bills, accounts, inventories: everyday trilingual activities in the business world of later Medieval England. In Trotter, D. A. (ed.), Multilingualism in Later Medieval Britain. Cambridge: Brewer, pp. 149–156.Google Scholar

Wright, Laura. 2012. On variation and change in London medieval mixed-language business writing. In Stenroos, Merja, Mäkinen, Martti and Særheim, Inge (eds.), Language Contact and Development around the North Sea. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 99–118.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The PDF of this book conforms to version 2.0 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic (A) level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.

Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.

Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.

Structural and Technical Features

ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.