Book contents
- The New Cambridge History of the English Language
- The New Cambridge History of the English Language
- The New Cambridge History of the English Language
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors to Volume III
- General Preface
- Abbreviations
- General Editor’s Introduction
- Introduction to Volume III
- Part I The Transmission of English
- Part II Tracking Change in the History of English
- Part III Ideology, Society and the History of English
- Index
- References
Introduction to Volume III
Published online by Cambridge University Press: aN Invalid Date NaN
Edited by
Book contents
- The New Cambridge History of the English Language
- The New Cambridge History of the English Language
- The New Cambridge History of the English Language
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors to Volume III
- General Preface
- Abbreviations
- General Editor’s Introduction
- Introduction to Volume III
- Part I The Transmission of English
- Part II Tracking Change in the History of English
- Part III Ideology, Society and the History of English
- Index
- References
Summary
The development of English in the past few centuries is highlighted in this volume with the major issues of transmission and change forming the main focus. Different levels of languages are examined in individual chapters and individual case studies throw light on specifically relevant developments. The chronological range of the volume extends to the present with changes in Modern English viewed as continuations of trajectories established over a much longer preceding period. The role of ideology and prescriptivism in shaping the manner in which English was standardised in the Late Modern English period is also a central concern with the nature of networks, coalitions, communities of practice and enregisterment examined in detail.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The New Cambridge History of the English LanguageTransmission, Change and Ideology, pp. 14 - 32Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Aarts, Bas, Bowie, Jill and Popova, Gergana (eds.). 2020. The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, Cynthia. 2019. Dative External Possessors in Early English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2002. Negation in Non-standard British English: Gaps, Regularisations and Asymmetries. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2016. Language between Description and Prescription: Verb Categories in Nineteenth-Century Grammars of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Conrad., Susan 2019. Register, Genre, and Style. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110907582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 2017. The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers in English: Pathways of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, Don and Rawlins, Jacob D. (eds.). 2020. Language Prescription: Values, Ideologies and Identity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Considine, John (ed.). 2019. The Cambridge World History of Lexicography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2016. The Oxford Dictionary of Original Shakespearean Pronunciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acref/9780199668427.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danet, Brenda and Herring, Susan C. (eds.). 2007. The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture and Communication Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De, Smet, Hendrik. 2013. Spreading Patterns: Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2007. Morphosyntactic Change: Functional and Formal Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grund, Peter J. 2021. The Sociopragmatics of Stance. Community, Language, and the Witness Depositions from the Salem Witch Trials. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hasselgård, Hilde. 2010. Adjunct Adverbials in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hejná, Míša and Walkden., George 2022. A History of English. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel and Conde-Silvestre, Juan Camilo (eds.). 2025. The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics. Second edition. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kopaczyk, Joanna and Jucker, Andreas H. (eds.). 2013. Communities of Practice in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja and Smitterberg, Erik (eds.). 2020. Late Modern English: Novel Encounters. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larrivée, Pierre and Ingham, Richard P. (eds.). 2012. The Evolution of Negation. Beyond the Jespersen Cycle. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Lenker, Ursula. 2010. Argument and Rhetoric: Adverbial Connectors in the History of English. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110216066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2006. Twentieth-Century English: History, Variation, and Standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 1992. Linguistic Variation and Change. On the Historical Sociolinguistics of English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, James and Milroy., Lesley 1999. Authority in Language. Investigating Language Standardisation and Prescription. Third edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Minkova, Donka. 2014. A Historical Phonology of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Colette and Palmer, Chris C. (eds.). 2019. Teaching the History of the English Language. New York: The Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
Mugglestone, Lynda (ed.). 2000. Lexicography and the OED: Pioneers in the Untrodden Forest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198237846.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mugglestone, Lynda. 2003. ‘Talking Proper’: The Rise of Accent as Social Symbol. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mugglestone, Lynda (ed.). 2005. Lost for Words: The Hidden History of the Oxford English Dictionary. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mugglestone, Lynda. 2015. Samuel Johnson and the Journey into Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu and Raumolin-Brunberg., Helena 2016. Historical Sociolinguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England. Second edition. London: Pearson Education.10.4324/9781315475172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petré, Peter. 2014. Constructions and Environments: Copular, Passive and Related Constructions in Old and Middle English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 1982. Socio-historical Linguistics: Its Status and Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenbach, Anette. 2002. Genitive Variation in English. Conceptual Factors in Synchronic and Diachronic Studies. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110899818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salkie, Raphael, Busuttil, Pierre and van der Auwera, Johan (eds.). 2009. Modality in English: Theory and Description. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110213331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Kate, Clark, Billy and Carston, Robyn (eds.). 2019. Relevance, Pragmatics and Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suárez-Gómez, Cristina. 2006. Relativisation in Early English (950–1250). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid (ed.). 2008. Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar Writing in Eighteenth-Century England. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110199185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2009. An Introduction to Late Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2020. Describing Prescriptivism: Usage Guides and Usage Problems in British and American English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Timofeeva, Olga. 2022. Sociolinguistic Variation in Old English. Records of Communities and People. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ahs.13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Laura (ed.). 2020. The Multilingual Origins of Standard English. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The PDF of this book
conforms to version 2.0 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic
(A)
level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.