Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-tldsr Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-11-09T10:35:22.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - The History of Semantic Theory

from Part II - Tracking Change in the History of English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2025

Joan C. Beal
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Get access

Summary

The chapter is grounded in the idea that semantic change is rooted in pragmatic meaning and discursive context. The principle underpinning this idea is that meaning is both cognitive and communicative in nature, such that we understand semantics as meaning and pragmatics as use. In this chapter, we trace this approach from nineteenth- and twentieth- century philological theories of meaning change, through the formalisation of the relationship of pragmatic and semantic domains of meaning in the invited inference theory of semantic change as developed by Traugott and her collaborators. The chapter explores the implications for a theory of semantic change of a new approach that begins not with the lexical item (semasiology) or the concept (onomasiology) but with discourse. We draw upon innovative digital methods for studying meaning change in the history of English to explore patterns and processes of semantic change in very large text corpora that invite distant rather than close reading, afforded by computational methodologies. In the process, we elaborate how linguistic concept modelling permits the structure of a pragmatic discursive theory of semantic change.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
The New Cambridge History of the English Language
Transmission, Change and Ideology
, pp. 572 - 597
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allan, Kathryn. Forthcoming. Historical semantics. In Wright, Laura and Hickey, Raymond (eds.), New Cambridge History of the English Language, Volume I: Context, Contact and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel. 2006. Pathways in the development of pragmatic markers in English. In van Kemenade, Ans and Los, Bettelou (eds.), The Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 307334.Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Chichester: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2004. Truth-conditional content and conversational implicature. In Bianchi, Claudia (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, pp. 65100.Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2010. Metaphor: ad hoc concepts, literal meaning and mental images. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society CX.3: 295321.Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2012. Word meaning and concept expressed. The Linguistic Review 29.4: 607623.Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2016. The heterogeneity of procedural meaning. Lingua 175–176: 154166.Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2019. Ad hoc concepts, polysemy and the lexicon. In Scott, Kate, Clark, Billy and Carston, Robyn (eds.), Relevance, Pragmatics and Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 150162.Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2021. Polysemy, pragmatics and sense conventions. Language and Mind 36.1: 108133.10.1111/mila.12329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darmesteter, Arsene. 1886. The Life of Words as Symbols of Ideas. Translator unnamed. London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Co.Google Scholar
Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership (EEBO-TCP). 2015. ProQuest.https://proquest.libguides.com/eebopqp.Google Scholar
Erdmann, Karl-Otto. 1910. Die Bedeutung des Wortes: Aufsätze aus dem Grenzgebiet der Sprachpsychologie und Logik. Second edition. Leipzig: Avenarius.Google Scholar
Firth, John R. 1957. A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930–1955. In Palmer, Frank R. (ed.), Selected Papers of J. R. Firth 1952–1959. London: Longman, pp. 168205.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2009. The sociopragmatic of a lovers’ spat: the case of the eighteenth-century courtship letters of Mary Pierrepont and Edward Wortley. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 10.2: 215237. Reprinted in Jonathan Culpeper (ed.). 2011. Historical Sociopragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/jhp.10.2.04fitCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2015. Ideology, race and place in historical constructions of belonging in the case of Zimbabwe. English Language and Linguistics 19.2: 327354.10.1017/S1360674315000106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2016. Semantic and pragmatic change. In Kytö, Merja and Pahta, Päivi (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 256270.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2017. When natives became Africans: a historical sociolinguistic study of semantic change in colonial discourse. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 3.1: 136.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2021. Looking for concepts in Early Modern English: hypothesis building and the uses of encyclopaedic knowledge and pragmatic work. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 22.2: 282300.10.1075/jhp.00057.fitCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2022. From constellations to discursive concepts; or: the historical pragmatic construction of meaning in Early Modern English. Transactions of the Philological Society 120.3: 489506.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan, Robinson, Justyna A., Alexander, Marc, Hine, Iona C., Mehl, Seth and Dallachy, Fraser. 2017. Linguistic DNA: investigating conceptual change in Early Modern English discourse. Studia Neophilologica 89: 2138.10.1080/00393274.2017.1333891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan and Mehl, Seth. 2022. Volatile discursive concepts: co-occurrence quads as indicators of semantic and pragmatic change in Early Modern English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17.4: 428450.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2010. Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haase, Friedrich. 1874–1880. Vorlesungen über lateinische Sprachwissenschaft, gehalten ab 1840. Leipzig: Simmel.Google Scholar
Hecht, Max. 1888. Die griechische Bedeutungslehre: eine Aufgabe der klassischen Philologie. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm. 1836. Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: Dümmler.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. 1755. A Dictionary of the English Language. London: W. Strahan.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. (ed.). 1995. Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lazarus, Moritz. 1856–1857. Das Leben der Seele in Monographien über seine Erscheinung und Gesetze. Berlin: Dümmler.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1995. Three levels of meaning. In Palmer, Frank R. (ed.), Grammar and Meaning: Essays in Honor of Sir John Lyons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 90115.10.1017/CBO9780511620638.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehl, Seth. 2022. Discursive quads: new kinds of lexical co-occurrence data with linguistic concept modelling. Transactions of the Philological Society 120.3: 474488.10.1111/1467-968X.12251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moody, Michael E. 2004. Browne, Robert (1550?–1633). Dictionary of National Biography. https://doi-org.sheffield.idm.oclc.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/3695.Google Scholar
Nerlich, Brigitte. 1992. Semantic Theories in Europe 1830–1930: From Etymology to Contextuality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sihols.59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1891. Principles of the History of Language. [Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte] Trans. by H. A. Strong. London: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
Recanati, François. 2004. Pragmatics and semantics. In Horn, Laurence R. and Ward, Gregory (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics. Chichester: Blackwell, pp. 442462.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst. 1977. Hermeneutik und Kritik; mit einem Anhang sprachphilosophischer Texte Schleiermachers. Edited with an introduction by Frank, Manfred. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Stout, G. F. 1891. Thought and language. Mind 62: 181205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 57: 3165.10.2307/414841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Dasher, Richard B.. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ullmann, Stephen. 1963. The Principles of Semantics. Glasgow: Glasgow University Publications.Google Scholar
Whitlock, Gillian. 2000. The Intimate Empire: Reading Women’s Autobiography. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan. 2004. Relevance theory. In Horne, Laurence R. and Ward, Gregory (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics. Chichester: Blackwell, pp. 607632.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The PDF of this book conforms to version 2.0 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic (A) level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.

Structural and Technical Features

ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×