Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-m2b9p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-09T17:37:43.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I - The Context of English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2025

Edited by
Laura Wright  and
Raymond Hickey
Laura Wright
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Raymond Hickey
Affiliation:
University of Limerick
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
The New Cambridge History of the English Language
Context, Contact and Development
 , pp. 25 - 162
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Anthony, David W. 2007. The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Will, Cathcart, Chundra, Hall, David and Garrett, Andrew. 2015. Ancestry-constrained phylogenetic analysis supports the Indo-European steppe hypothesis. Language 91: 194–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clackson, James. 2007. Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511808616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry. 2010. An Introduction to Historical Linguistics. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Steven N., Ringe, Don and Warnow, Tandy. 2006. Inference of divergence times as a statistical inverse problem. In Forster, Peter and Renfrew, Colin (eds.), Phylogenetic Methods and the Prehistory of Languages. Cambridge: McDonald Institute, pp. 119–129.Google Scholar
Fortson, Benjamin W. IV. 2010. Indo-European Language and Culture: An Introduction. Second edition. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fox, Anthony. 1995. Linguistic Reconstruction: An Introduction to Theory and Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198700005.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fruehwald, Josef. 2016. The early influence of phonology on a phonetic change. Language 92: 376–410.10.1353/lan.2016.0041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Russell D. and Atkinson, Quentin D.. 2003. Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426: 435–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haak, Wolfgang Iosif Lazaridis, Patterson, Nick, Rohland, Nadin, Mallick, Swapan, Llamas, Bastien, Brandt, Guido, Nordenfel, Susanne et al. 2015. Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages in Europe. Nature 522: 207–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, Eugen. 2004. Das germanische Verb für ‘tun’ und die Ausgänge des germanischen schwachen Präteritums. Sprachwissenschaft 29: 257–303.Google Scholar
Hill, Eugen. 2010. A case study in grammaticalized inflectional morphology: origin and development of the Germanic weak preterite. Diachronica 27: 411–458.10.1075/dia.27.3.02hilCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoenigswald, Henry M. 1960. Language Change and Linguistic Reconstruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Jay H. 2003. Hittite and the Indo-European Verb. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249053.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Joshua T. 1998. Topics in Indo-European personal pronouns. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Kessler, Brett. 2001. The Significance of Word Lists. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Kessler, Brett and Lehtonen, Annukka. 2006. Multilateral comparison and significance testing of the Indo-Uralic question. In Forster, Peter and Renfrew, Colin (eds.), Phylogenetic Methods and the Prehistory of Languages. Cambridge: McDonald Institute, pp. 33–42.Google Scholar
Kroonen, Guus. 2012. Non-Indo-European root nouns in Germanic: evidence in support of the Agricultural Substrate Hypothesis. In Grünthal, Riho and Kallio, Petri (eds.), A Linguistic Map of Prehistoric Northern Europe. Helsinki: Société Finno-Ougrienne, pp. 239–260.Google Scholar
Kümmel, Martin. 2007. Konsonantenwandel. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Kümmel, Martin. 2020. The development of the perfect within IE verbal systems: an overview. In Crellin, Robert and Jügel, Thomas (eds.), Perfects in Indo-European Languages and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 15–47.10.1075/cilt.352.02kumCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 2020. The regularity of regular sound change. Language 96.1: 42–59.10.1353/lan.2020.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lühr, Rosemarie. 1984. Reste der athematischen Konjugation in den germanischen Sprachen. In Untermann, Jürgen and Brogyanyi, Béla (eds.), Das Germanische und die Rekonstruktion der indogermanischen Grundsprache. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 25–90.10.1075/cilt.22.04luhCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallory, J. P. 1989. In Search of the Indo-Europeans: Language, Archaeology, and Myth. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Mottausch, Karl-Heinz. 2013. Untersuchungen zur Vorgeschichte des germanischen starken Verbs: die Rolle des Aorists. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač.Google Scholar
Nakhleh, Luay, Ringe, Don and Warnow, Tandy. 2005. Perfect phylogenetic networks: a new methodology for reconstructing the evolutionary history of natural languages. Language 81: 382–420.10.1353/lan.2005.0078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1920 [1880]. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Fifth edition. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Jens Elmegård. 1996. On the origin of the Germanic weak preterite. Copenhagen Working Papers in Linguistics 4: 161–168.Google Scholar
Reich, David. 2019. Who We Are and How We Got Here: Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Past. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Ringe, Don. 2017. From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringe, Don. 2022. Stative perfects. In Peter, M. Scharf (ed.), Indian Linguistic Studies in Honor of George Cardona, Vol. II: Historical Linguistics, Vedic, etc. Providence, RI: The Sanskrit Library, pp. 85–98.Google Scholar
Ringe, Don and Eska, Joseph F.. 2013. Historical Linguistics: Toward a Twenty-First Century Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringe, Don and Taylor, Ann. 2014. The Development of Old English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207848.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringe, Don, Warnow, Tandy and Taylor, Ann. 2002. Indo-European and computational cladistics. Transactions of the Philological Society 100: 59–129.10.1111/1467-968X.00091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rix, Helmut, Kümmel, Martin, Zehnder, Thomas, Lipp, Reiner and Schirmer, Brigitte. 2001. LIV, Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben: die Wurzeln und ihre Primärstammbildungen. Second edition. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Stiles, Patrick V. 1985–1986. The fate of the numeral ‘4’ in Germanic. North-Western European Language Evolution 6: 81–104, 7: 3–27, 8: 3–25.10.1075/nowele.6.06stiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiles, Patrick V. 2010. The Gothic extended forms of the dental preterite endings. North-Western European Language Evolution 58–59: 343–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Anthony R. 1993. English Auxiliaries: Structure and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511752995CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Antonsen, Elmer. 1975. A Concise Grammar of the Older Runic Inscriptions. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bech, Kristin and Walkden, George. 2014. English is (still) a West Germanic language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39: 65–100.10.1017/S0332586515000219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremmer, Rolf. 1989. Late medieval and early modern opinions on the affinity between English and Frisian: the growth of a commonplace. Folia Linguistica Historica 22: 167–192.10.1515/flih.1989.9.1.167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremmer, Rolf. 2009. An Introduction to Old Frisian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buccini, Anthony. 2010. Between pre-German and pre-English: the origin of Dutch. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 22: 310–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCamp, David. 1958. The genesis of the Old English dialects: a new hypothesis. Language 34: 232–244.10.2307/410826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drinka, Bridget. 2014. Phylogenetic and areal models of Indo-European relatedness: the role of contact in reconstruction. Journal of Language Contact 6: 379–410.10.1163/19552629-00602009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph and Terje Faarlund, Jan. 2014. English: The Language of the Vikings. Olomouc: Palacký University.Google Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje and Emonds, Joseph. 2016. English as North Germanic. Language Dynamics and Change 6: 1–17.10.1163/22105832-00601002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Font-Santiago, Cristopher and Salmons, Joseph. 2016. The descent of English: West Germanic, any way you slice it. Language Dynamics and Change 6: 37–41.10.1163/22105832-00601009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooskens, Charlotte. 2020. The North Germanic dialect continuum. In Michael, T. Putnam and Page, Richard B. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 761–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grønvik, Ottar. 1998. Untersuchungen zur älteren nordischen und germanischen Sprachen. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Harbert, Wayne. 2007. The Germanic Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2012. Early English and the Celtic hypothesis. In Nevalainen, Terttu and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 497–507.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1998. How young is Standard Average Indo-European? Language Sciences 20: 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keel, William D. 2020. The West Germanic dialect continuum. In Michael, T. Putnam and Richard, B. Page (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 736–782.10.1017/9781108378291.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kortlandt, Frederik. 1986. The origin of the Old English dialects. In Kastovsky, Dieter and Szwedek, Aleksander (eds.), Linguistics across Historical and Geographical Boundaries, Vol. I. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 437–442.10.1515/9783110856132.437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kortlandt, Frederik. 1999. The origin of the Old English dialects revisited. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 49: 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Hans. 1955. Friesisch und Nordseegermanisch. Us Wurk IV: 37–46.Google Scholar
Markey, Thomas L. 1976a. Germanic Dialect Grouping and the Position of Ingvaeonic. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, University of Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Markey, Thomas L. 1976b. A North Sea Germanic Reader. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Migdalski, Krysztof. 2016. Second Position Effects in the Syntax of Slavic and Germanic Languages. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John. 2002. What happened to English? Diachronica 19: 217–272.10.1075/dia.19.2.02whaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulton, William G. 1954. The stops and spirants of early Germanic. Language 30: 1–42.10.2307/410217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Hans Frede. 1981. Old English and the Continental Germanic Languages: A Survey of Morphological and Phonological Interrelations. Innsbrück: University of Innsbrück.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Hans Frede. 1998. The Continental Backgrounds of English and Its Insular Development until 1154. Odense: Odense University Press.10.1075/nss.19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Hans Frede. 2001. Frisian and the grouping of the older Germanic languages. In Munske, Horst Haider, Århammer, Nils, Volker F. Faltings, Alastair G. H. Walters and Wilts, Ommo (eds.), Handbuch des Friesischen/Handbook of Frisian Studies, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, pp. 512–523.10.1515/9783110946925.512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringe, Donald. 2006. From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ringe, Donald. 2013. What is Old English? Unity and Diversity in West Germanic (ed. Hans Frede Nielsen and Patrick V. Stiles). Special issue of NOWELE 66.1: 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringe, Donald and Taylor, Ann. 2014. The Development of Old English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207848.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberge, Paul. 2020. Contact in the history of the Germanic languages. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Handbook of Language Contact. Second edition. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell, p. 323–344.10.1002/9781119485094.ch16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrijver, Peter. 2014. Language Contact and the Origins of the Germanic Languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Seebold, Elmar. 1995. Wer waren die Friesen – sprachlich gesehen? [Who were the Frisians – from a language point of view?]. In Faltings, Volkert F., Walter, Alastair G. H. and Williams, Ommo (eds.), Friesische Studien II. Odense: Odense University Press, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Seebold, Elmar. 2013. Die Aufgliederung der germanischen Sprachen. NOWELE 66: 55–77.10.1075/nowele.66.1.04seeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siebs, Theodor. 1901. Geschichte der friesischen Sprache. Pauls Grundriss der germanischen Philologie. Second edition. Vol. I. Strasbourg: K. J. Trübner, pp. 1152–1464.Google Scholar
Stenbrenden, Gjertrud Flermoen. 2016. Why English is not dead: a rejoinder to Emonds and Faarlund. Folia Linguistica Historica 37: 239–279.10.1515/flih-2016-0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiles, Patrick. 1995. Remarks on the ‘Anglo-Frisian’ thesis. In Faltings, Volkert F., Walter, Alastair G. H. and Williams, Ommo (eds.), Friesische Studien II. Odense: Odense University Press, pp. 177–220.10.1075/nss.12.11stiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiles, Patrick. 2013. The Pan-West Germanic isoglosses and the sub-relationships of West Germanic to the other branches. NOWELE 66: 5–38.10.1075/nowele.66.1.02stiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. and Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520912793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 2001. Language Contact: An Introduction. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
van Bree, Cor. 1999. The strange simplicity of Gothic. NOWELE 35: 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Coetsem, Frans. 1988. Loan Phonology and the Two Transfer Types in Language Contact. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110884869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Coetsem, Frans. 2000. A General and Unified Theory of the Transmission Process in Language Contact. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 2010. Contact and prehistory: the Indo-European Northwest. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 380–406.10.1002/9781444318159.ch19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Adamczyk, Elżbieta. 2023. Traces of language contact in nominal morphology of Late Northumbrian and Northern Middle English. In Sara, M. Pons-Sanz and Sylvester, Louise (eds.), Medieval English in a Multilingual Context Current Methodologies and Approaches. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 279–310.10.1007/978-3-031-30947-2_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. N. 2007. The Regional Diversification of Latin 200 BC – AD 600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511482977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Charles James N. and Maroldt, Karl. 1977. The French lineage of English. In Meisel, Jürgen (ed.), Langues en contact – Pidgins – Creoles – Languages in Contact. Tübingen: Narr, pp. 21–51.Google Scholar
Benskin, Michael. 1994. Descriptions of dialect and areal distributions. In Laing, Margaret and Williamson, Keith (eds.), Speaking in Our Tongues: Proceedings of a Colloquium on Medieval Dialectology and Related Disciplines. Cambridge: Brewer, pp. 169–187.Google Scholar
Benskin, Michael. 2011. Present indicative plural concord in Brittonic and early English. Transactions of the Philological Society 109: 158‒185.10.1111/j.1467-968X.2011.01279.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom, Alderik H. 2017. Glossing the Psalms: The Emergence of the Written Vernaculars in Western Europe from the Seventh to the Twelfth Centuries. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110501865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Michelle P. 2016. ‘A good woman’s Son’: aspects of Aldred’s agenda in glossing the Lindisfarne Gospels. In Cuesta, Julia Fernández and Pons-Sanz, Sara (eds.), The Old English Glosses to the Lindisfarne Gospels: Language, Author and Context. Buchreihe der Anglia. Anglian Book Series, Vol. 51. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 13–36.10.1515/9783110449105-006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capelli, Cristian, Redhead, Nicola, Abernethy, Julia K., Gratrix, Fiona, Wilson, James F., Moen, Torolf, Hervig, Tor, Richards, Martin, Stumpf, Michael P. H., Underhill, Peter A., Bradshaw, Paul, Shaha, Alom, Thomas, Mark G., Bradman, Neal and Goldstein, David B.. 2003. A Y chromosome consensus of the British Isles. Current Biology 13: 979–984.10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00373-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capelli, C. Redhead, N., Abernethy, J. K., Gratrix, F., Wilson, J. F., Moen, T., Hervig, T., Richards, M., Stumpf, M. P. H., Underhill, P. A., Bradshaw, P., Shaha, A., Thomas, M. G., Bradman, N. and Goldstein, D. G. 2003. A Y chromosome consensus of the British Isles. Current Biology 13: 979–984.10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00373-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Cecily. 1992. Onomastics. In Blake, Norman (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. II: 1066–1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 542–604.10.1017/CHOL9780521264754.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, Richard. 2007. Invisible Britons: the view from linguistics. In Higham, Nicholas (ed.), Britons in Anglo-Saxon England. Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer, pp. 172–191.10.1515/9781846155185-019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Marcelle. 2014. Old Northumbrian Verbal Morphosyntax and the (Northern) Subject Rule. NOWELE Supplement Series 25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisma, Paola and Pintzuk, Susan. 2019. The noun phrase and the ‘Viking hypothesis’. Language Variation and Change 31: 219–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 1995. Middle English is a Creole and its opposite: on the value of plausible speculation. In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Linguistic Change under Contact Conditions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 35–50.10.1515/9783110885170.35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dance, Richard. 2019. Words Derived from Old Norse in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight: An Etymological Survey. Publications of the Philological Society 50. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Domingue, Nicole Z. 1977. Middle English: another creole? Journal of Creole Studies 1: 89–100.Google Scholar
Eble, Connie. 1970. Noun inflection in Royal 7.C.XII, Ælfric’s First Series of Catholic Homilies. PhD dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph and Terje Faarlund, Jan. 2014. The Language of the Vikings. Olomouc Modern Language Monographs 3. Olomouc: Palacký University.Google Scholar
Faulkner, Mark. 2020. Quantifying the consistency of ‘standard’ Old English spelling. Transactions of the Philological Society 118.1: 192–205.10.1111/1467-968X.12182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández Cuesta, Julia and Langmuir, Christopher. 2019. Verbal morphology in the Old English gloss to the Durham Collectar. North-Western European Language Evolution 72.2: 134–164.10.1075/nowele.00025.ferCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández Cuesta, Julia and Langmuir, Christopher. 2025. Mood selection in the Old Northumbrian Gloss to Durham MS A.iv.19. Transactions of the Philological Society 123.1.Google Scholar
Fernández Cuesta, Julia and Rodríguez Ledesma, Nieves. 2020. Reduced forms in the nominal morphology of the Lindisfarne Gospel Gloss: a case of accusative/dative syncretism. Folia Linguistica Historica 41.1: 37–66.10.1515/flih-2020-0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filppula, Marku, Klemola, Juhani and Paulasto, Heli. 2008. English and Celtic in Contact. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203895009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, Robin. 2010. Britain after Rome: The Fall and Rise 400 to 1070. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gneuss, Helmut. 1972. The origin of Standard Old English and Æthelwold’s school at Winchester. Anglo-Saxon England 1: 63–83.10.1017/S0263675100000089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Görlach, Manfred. 1986. Middle English – a Creole? In Kastovsky, Dieter and Szwedek, Aleksander (eds.), Linguistics across Historical and Geographical Boundaries. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 329–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gretsch, Mechthild. 2003. In search of Standard Old English. In Kornexl, Lucia and Lenker, Ursula (eds.), Bookmarks from the Past: Studies in Early English Language and Literature in Honour of Helmut Gneuss. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 33–67.Google Scholar
Gretsch, Mechthild. 2006. A key to Ælfric’s Standard Old English. Leeds Studies in English 37: 161–177.Google Scholar
Grimmer, Martin. 2002. Britons and Saxons in Pre-Viking Wessex: reflections on the Law 77 of King Ine. Parergon: Bulletin of the Australian and New Zealand Association for Medieval and Renaissance Studies 19.1: 1–17.10.1353/pgn.2002.0093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadley, Dawn M. 2006. The Vikings in England: Settlement, Society and Culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1966. Dialect, language, nation. American Anthropologist 68.4: 922–935.10.1525/aa.1966.68.4.02a00040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Härke, Heinrich. 2007. Invisible Britons, Gallo-Romans and Russians: perspectives on culture change. In Higham, Nicholas J. (ed.), Britons in Anglo-Saxon England. Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer, pp. 57–67.10.1515/9781846155185-010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2012. Assessing the role of contact in the history of English. In Nevalainen, Terttu and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 485–496.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2020a. The interplay of internal and external factors in varieties of English. In Kytö, Merja and Smitterberg, Erik (eds.), Late Modern English: Novel Encounters. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 43–64.10.1075/slcs.214.02hicCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond (ed.). 2020b. The Handbook of Language Contact. Second edition. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781119485094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higham, Nicholas J. 2013. Britain in and out of the Roman Empire. In Higham, Nicholas J. and Ryan, Martin J. (eds.), The Anglo-Saxon World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 20–69.Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard. 1992a. General Editor’s preface. In Richard Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. I: The Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. xiii–xvi.Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard. 1992b. Introduction. In Richard Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. I: The Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Hough, Carol. 2012. Celts in Scandinavian Scotland and Anglo-Saxon England: place-names and language contact reconsidered. In Stenroos, Merja, Mäkinen, Martti and Særheim, Inge (eds.), Language Contact and Development around the North Sea. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 3–22.10.1075/cilt.321.01houCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolly, Karen L. 2012. The Community of St. Cuthbert in the Late Tenth Century: The Chester-le-Street Additions to Durham Cathedral Library A.IV.19. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter. 1992. Semantics and vocabulary. In Hogg, Richard (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. I: The Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 290–407.10.1017/CHOL9780521264747.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornexl, Lucia. 2012. Old English: standardization. In Bergs, Alexander and Brinton, Laurel J. (eds.), English Historical Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol. I. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 373–385.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 2016. The Viking hypothesis from a dialectologist’s perspective. Language Dynamics and Change 6: 27–30.10.1163/22105832-00601006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Sherman. 1945. e and æ in Farman’s Mercian Glosses. PMLA 60: 641–642.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. I: Internal Factors. Language in Society 20. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Laing, Margaret and Lass, Roger. 2010. Raiders of the lost archetype: eo in the strong verbs of classes IV and V. Transactions of the Philological Society 108.2: 145–163.10.1111/j.1467-968X.2010.01238.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1980. On Explaining Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenker, Ursula. 2000. Monasteries of the Benedictine Reform and the ‘Winchester School’: model cases of social networks in Anglo-Saxon England? Social Network Analysis and the History of English (ed. Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Terttu Nevalainen and Luisella Caon). Special issue of European Journal of English Studies 4.3: 225–238.Google Scholar
Leslie, Stephen, Winney, Bruce, Hellenthal, Garett, Davison, Dan, Abdelhamid Boumertit, Day, Tamm, Hutnik, Katarzyna, Royrvik, Ellen C., Cunliffe, Barry, Lawson, Daniel J, Falush, Daniel, Freeman, Colin, Pirinen, Matti, Myers, Simon, Robinson, Mark, Donnelly, Peter and Bodmer, Walter. 2015. The fine-scale genetic structure of the British Population. Nature 519: 309–314.10.1038/nature14230CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowe, Kathryn A. 2001. On the plausibility of Old English dialectology: the ninth-century Kentish charter material. Folia Linguistica Historica 2.1: 136–170.Google Scholar
Machan, Tim. 2016. Snakes, ladders, and standard language. In Machan, Tim (ed). Imagining Medieval English: Language Structures and Theories, 500–1500. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 54–77.10.1017/CBO9781107415836.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Márkus, Gilbert. 2017. Conceiving a Nation: Scotland to AD 900. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 1992. Middle English dialectology. In Blake, Norman (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. I: 1066–1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 156–204.10.1017/CHOL9780521264754.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James. 2003. On the role of the speaker in language change. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Motives for Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 143–158.10.1017/CBO9780511486937.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James and Milroy, Lesley. 2012. Authority in Language. London/New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203124666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2009. The evolution of language: hints from creoles and pidgins. In Minett, James and Wang, William (eds.), Language, Evolution, and the Brain. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
O’Neil, David. 2019. The Middle English creolization hypothesis: persistence, implications and language ideology. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 54: 113–132.10.2478/stap-2019-0006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pons-Sanz, Sara M. 2013. The Lexical Effects of Anglo-Scandinavian Linguistic Contact on Old English. Turnhout: Brepols.10.1484/M.SEM-EB.5.106260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poussa, Patricia. 1982. The evolution of early Standard English: the creolization hypothesis. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 14: 69–85.Google Scholar
Richards, Julian D. and Haldenby, Dave. 2018. The scale and impact of Viking settlement in Northumbria. Medieval Archaeology 62.2: 322–350.10.1080/00766097.2018.1535382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Jane. 2016. Aldred: Glossator and book historian. In Cuesta, Julia Fernández and Pons-Sanz, Sara (eds.), The Old English Glosses to the Lindisfarne Gospels: Language, Author and Context. Buchreihe der Anglia. Anglian Book Series 51. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 37–60.10.1515/9783110449105-007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez Ledesma, Nieves. 2022. Changes in progress in Old Northumbrian: the extension of -s as genitive and plural marker. English Language and Linguistics 26.4: 697–722.10.1017/S1360674321000435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Alan S. C. 1937. Studies in the Accidence of the Lindisfarne Gospels. Leeds School of English Language Texts and Monographs 2. Leeds University.Google Scholar
Ross, Alan S. C. 1970. Conservatism in the Anglo-Saxon gloss to the Durham Ritual. Notes and Queries 215: 363–366.10.1093/nq/17-10-363bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, P. H. 1958. The density of the Danish settlement in England. University of Birmingham Historical Journal 6: 1–17.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Peter. 2007. What Britons spoke around 400 AD. In Nicholas, J. Higham (ed.), Britons in Anglo-Saxon England. Publications of the Manchester Centre for Anglo-Saxon Studies 7. Woodbridge: Boydell Press, pp. 165–171.10.1515/9781846155185-018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scragg, Donald. 2006. The Return of the Vikings: The Battle of Maldon 991. Cheltenham: The History Press.Google Scholar
Sykes, Bryan. 2006. Blood of the Isles: Exploring the Genetic Roots of Our Tribal History. London: Bantam.Google Scholar
Synder, Christopher. 2003. The Britons (The Peoples of Europe). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey. 2001. Language Contact. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey and Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520912793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timofeeva, Olga. 2010. Anglo-Latin bilingualism before 1066: prospects and limitations. In Hall, Alaric, Timofeeva, Olga, Kiricsi, Ágnes and Fox, Bethany (eds.), Interfaces between Language and Culture in Medieval England: A Festschrift for Matti Kilpiö. Leiden: Brill, pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
Timofeeva, Olga. 2017. AELFRED MEC HEHT GEWYRCAN: sociolinguistic concepts in the study of Alfredian English. English Language and Linguistics 22.1: 123–148.10.1017/S1360674316000435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timofeeva, Olga. 2022. Sociolinguistic Variation in Old English: Records of Communities and People. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ahs.13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toon, Thomas. 1983. The Politics of Early Old English Sound Change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Toon, Thomas. 1992. Old English dialects. In Hogg, Richard (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. I: The Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 409–451.10.1017/CHOL9780521264747.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townend, Matthew. 2002. Language and History in Viking Age England: Linguistic Relations Between Speakers of Old Norse and Old English. Turnhout: Brepols.10.1484/M.SEM-EB.5.106296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townend, Matthew. 2006. Contacts and conflicts: Latin, Norse and French. In Mugglestone, Lynda (ed.), Oxford History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 61–85.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2016. Norsified English or Anglicized Norse? Language Dynamics and Change 6: 46–48.10.1163/22105832-00601011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkden, George. 2017. The actuation problem. In Ledgeway, Adam and Roberts, Ian (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 403–424.10.1017/9781107279070.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Anthony. 2017. Norse contact, simplification, and sociolinguistic typology. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 118.2: 317–404.Google Scholar
Weale, Michael E., Deborah A. Weiss, Rolf. F. Jager, Neil Bradman and Mark. G. Thomas. 2002. Y chromosome evidence for Anglo-Saxon mass migration. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19.7: 1008–1021.10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004160CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William and Herzog, Mervin. 1968 [1953]. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, Winfred and Malkiel, Yakov (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 95–189.Google Scholar
Woolf, Alex. 2007. Apartheid and economics in Anglo-Saxon England. In Higham, Nicholas (ed.), Britons in Anglo-Saxon England. Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer, pp. 115–129.10.1515/9781846155185-015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrenn, C. L. 1933. Standard Old English. Transactions of the Philological Society 32: 65–88.10.1111/j.1467-968X.1933.tb00190.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Laura. 2000. The Development of Standard English 1300–1800: Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511551758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Laura. 2013. The contact origins of Standard English. In Schreier, Daniel and Hundt, Marianne (eds.), English as a Contact Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 58–74.10.1017/CBO9780511740060.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Laura (ed.). 2020. The Multilingual Origins of Standard English. Topics in English Linguistics 107. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110687545CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Anderson, John and Britton, Derek. 1999. The orthography and phonology of the Ormulum. English Language and Linguistics 3.2: 299–334.10.1017/S1360674399000258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, Christopher J. E. 1970. The language of the Vespasian Psalter: two caveats. Review of English Studies 21: 462–465.10.1093/res/XXI.84.462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beadle, Richard. 1991. Prolegomena to a literary geography of later medieval Norfolk. In Riddy, Felicity (ed.), Regionalism in Late Medieval Manuscripts and Texts. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, pp. 89–108.Google Scholar
Benskin, Michael. 1982. The letters <þ> and <y> in later Middle English, and some related matters. Journal of the Society of Archivists 7.1: 13–30.10.1080/00379818209514199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benskin, Michael. 1991. The ‘fit’-technique explained. In Riddy, Felicity (ed.), Regionalism in Late Medieval Manuscripts and Texts. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, pp. 9–26.Google Scholar
Benskin, Michael. 1992. Some new perspectives on the origins of standard written English. In van Leuvensteijn, J. A. and Berns, J. B. (eds.), Dialect and Standard Language in the English, Dutch, German and Norwegian Language Areas. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, pp. 71–105.Google Scholar
Benskin, Michael and Laing, Margaret. 1981. Translations and Mischsprachen in Middle English manuscripts. In Benskin, Michael and Samuels, Michael L. (eds.), So Meny Peple Longages and Tonges: A Festschrift to Angus McIntosh. Edinburgh: Middle English Dialect Project, pp. 55–106.Google Scholar
Bergs, Alexander. 2006. Spreading the word: patterns of diffusion in historical dialectology. In Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani, Palander, Marjatta and Penttilä, Esa (eds.), Topics in Dialectal Variation: Selection of Papers from the Eleventh International Conference on Methods in Dialectology. Joensuu: Joensuu University Press, pp. 5–30.Google Scholar
Bergstrøm, Geir. 2017. ‘Yeuen at Cavmbrigg’: a study of the medieval English documents of Cambridge. PhD dissertation, University of Stavanger.Google Scholar
Black, Merja. 1998. Lollardy, language contact and the Great Vowel Shift: spellings in the defence papers of William Swinderby. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 99: 53–69.Google Scholar
Brandt, Deborah. 1998. Sponsors of literacy. College Composition and Communication 49: 165–185.10.58680/ccc19983181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britain, David. 2013. Space, diffusion and mobility. In Chambers, Jack K. and Schilling, Natalie (eds.), Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Second edition. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 471–500.Google Scholar
Britain, David. 2012. English in England. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Areal Features of the Anglophone World. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 23–52.10.1515/9783110279429.23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britain, David. 2005. Dialect and accent. In Ammon, Ulrich, Mattheier, Klaus and Trudgill, Peter (eds.), Sociolinguistics: An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society. Second edition. Vol. II. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 267–273.Google Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen, Campbell, Bruce M. S., Klein, Alexander, Overton, Mark and van Leeuwen, Bas. 2015. British Economic Growth, 1270–1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Alistair. 1959. Old English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Caxton, William. Dedication to Boke of Eneydos. Westminster: William Caxton, c. 1490. EEBO. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A14476.0001.001.Google Scholar
Cole, Marcelle. 2012. The Old English origins of the Northern Subject Rule: evidence from the Lindisfarne gloss to the Gospels of John and Mark. In Stenroos, Merja, Mäkinen, Martti and Særheim, Inge (eds.), Language Contact and Development around the North Sea. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 141–168.10.1075/cilt.321.08colCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Marcelle. 2019. Towards a nuanced history of early English spelling: Old Northumbrian witnesses and northern orthography. In Auer, Anita, Renevey, Denis, Marshall, Camille and Oudesluijs, Tino (eds.), Revisiting the Medieval North of England: Interdisciplinary Approaches. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, pp. 243–278.Google Scholar
Crowley, Joseph P. 1986. The study of Old English dialects. English Studies 2: 97–112.10.1080/00138388608598430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCamp, David. 1958. The genesis of the Old English dialects: a new hypothesis. Language 34: 232–244.10.2307/410826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Haas, Nynke K. 2011. Morphosyntactic Variation in Northern English: The Northern Subject Rule, Its Origins and Early History. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
DOEWC = Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus. 2009. Compiled by Antonette diPaolo Healey, with John Price Wilkin and Xin Xiang. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project. https://doe.artsci.utoronto.ca/.Google Scholar
Edmonds, Fiona. 2019. Gaelic Influence in the Northumbrian Kingdom: The Golden Age and the Viking Age. Cambridge: Boydell Press.10.1515/9781787445864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Robert. 2008. ‘Fer in the north; I can not telle where’: dialect, regionalism and philologism. Studies in the Age of Chaucer 30: 95–124.10.1353/sac.0.0021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filppula, Markku, Juhani Klemola and Heli Paulasto. 2008. English and Celtic in Contact. New York/Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9780203895009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisiak, Jacek. 2004. Some remarks on Middle English word geography. Poetica 62: 1–15.Google Scholar
Gneuss, Helmut. 1972. The origin of Standard Old English and Æthelwold’s school at Winchester. Anglo-Saxon England 1: 63–83.10.1017/S0263675100000089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel and Camilo Conde-Silvestre, Juan. 2005. Sociolinguistic and geolinguistic approaches to the historical diffusion of linguistic innovations: incipient standardisation in Late Middle English. International Journal of English Studies 5.1: 101–134.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2012. Early English and the Celtic hypothesis. In Nevalainen, Terttu and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 497–507.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higden, Ranulph. 1865–1886. Polychronicon. Together with the English Translations of John Trevisa and of an Unknown Writer of the Fifteenth Century. Ed. Babington, Churchill and Lumby, Joseph. Rolls Series 41. 9 vols. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hoad, Terry. 1994. Word geography: previous appproaches and achievement. In Laing, Margaret and Williamson, Keith (eds.), Speaking in Our Tongues: Medieval Dialectology and Related Disciplines. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, pp. 197–203.Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard M. 1992. A Grammar of Old English. Vol. I: Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard M. 1998. On the ideological boundaries of Old English dialects. In Fisiak, Jacek and Krygier, Marcin (eds.), Advances in English Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 107–118.Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard M. 2006a. English in Britain. In Hogg, Richard M. and Denison, David (eds.), A History of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 352–383.10.1017/CBO9780511791154.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Richard M. 2006b. Old English dialectology. In van Kemenade, Ans and Los, Bettelou (eds.), Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 395–416.Google Scholar
Horobin, Simon. 2001. Tolkien, J. R. R. as a philologist: a reconsideration of the northernisms in Chaucer’s Reeve’s Tale. English Studies 82.2: 97–105.10.1076/enst.82.2.97.9598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horobin, Simon. 2002. Chaucer’s Norfolk Reeve. Neophilologus 84: 609–612.10.1023/A:1019601712558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ihalainen, Ossi. 1994. The dialects of England since 1776. In Burchfield, Robert (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. V: English in Britain and Overseas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–274.10.1017/CHOL9780521264785.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitson, Peter. 1993. Geographical variation in Old English prepositions and the location of Ælfric’s and other literary dialects. English Studies 74.1: 1–50.10.1080/00138389308598839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitson, Peter. 2004. On margins of error in placing OE literary dialects. In Dossena, Marina and Lass, Roger (eds.), Methods and Data in English Historical Dialectology. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 219–239.Google Scholar
Knox, Philip. 2014. The ‘dialect’ of Chaucer’s Reeve. The Chaucer Review 49.1: 102–124.10.5325/chaucerrev.49.1.0102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzschmar, William A. Jr. 2009. The Linguistics of Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511576782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensson, Gillis. 1967–2001. A Survey of Middle English Dialects 1290–1350: The Six Northern Counties. Lund: University of Lund Press.Google Scholar
Kristensson, Gillis. 1987. A Survey of Middle English Dialects 1290–1350: The West Midland Counties. Lund: University of Lund Press.Google Scholar
Kristensson, Gillis. 1990. Middle English kirk and cognates in the Midlands. In Edlund, Lars-Erik and Persson, Gunnar (eds.), Language: The Time-Machine. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell, pp. 51–61.Google Scholar
Kristensson, Gillis. 1995. A Survey of Middle English Dialects 1290–1350: The East Midland Counties. Lund: University of Lund Press.Google Scholar
Kristensson, Gillis. 2001a. A Survey of Middle English Dialects 1290–1350: The Southern Counties. I: Vowels (except Diphthongs). Lund: University of Lund Press.Google Scholar
Kristensson, Gillis. 2001b. A Survey of Middle English Dialects 1290–1350: The Southern Counties. II: Diphthongs and Consonants. Lund: University of Lund Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Sherman M. 1965. The Vespasian Psalter. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
LAEME = A Linguistic Atlas of Early Middle English, 1150–1325. Version 3.2. 2013–. Compiled by Margaret Laing. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/laeme2/laeme2.html.Google Scholar
LALME = A Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English. 1986. Ed. McIntosh, Angus, Samuels, Michael L. and Benskin, Michael. 4 vols. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press. Revised online edition (eLALME) 2013. With revisions and supplements by Michael Benskin and Margaret Laing; webscripts by Vasilis Karaiskos and Keith Williamson. University of Edinburgh. www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/elalme/elalme.html.Google Scholar
Leslie, Stephen, Winney, Bruce, Garrett Hellenthal, Dan Davison, Abdelhamid Boumertit, Tammy Day, Katarzyna Hutnik et al. 2015. The fine-scale genetic structure of the British population. Nature 519.7543: 309–314.10.1038/nature14230CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowe, Kathryn A. 2001. On the plausibility of Old English dialectology: the ninth-century Kentish charter material. Folia Linguistica Historica 22.1 –2: 67–102.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Angus. 1956. The analysis of written Middle English. Transactions of the Philological Society 55.1: 26–55.10.1111/j.1467-968X.1956.tb00563.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, Angus. 1963. A new approach to Middle English dialectology. English Studies 44: 1–6.10.1080/00138386308597152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MELD = A Corpus of Middle English Local Documents. Version 2017.1. Compiled by Stenroos, Merja, Thengs, Kjetil V. and Bergstrøm, Geir. University of Stavanger. www.uis.no/meld.Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 1992. Linguistic Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
MMW = Moore, Samuel, Meech, Sanford B. and Harold, Whitehall. 1935. Middle English dialect characteristics and dialect boundaries. In Essays and Studies in English and Comparative Literature. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 1–60.Google Scholar
Oakden, James P. 1930. Alliterative Poetry in Middle English: The Dialectal and Metrical Survey. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Okamoto, Hiroki. 2017. ‘Curious fact’: fading of northernisms in The Reeve’s Tale. Bulletin of the Society for Chaucer Studies 5: 3–21.Google Scholar
Page, Raymond I. 1971. How long did the Scandinavian language survive in England? The epigraphical evidence. In Clemoes, Peter and Hughes, Kathleen (eds.), England before the Conquest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 165–181.Google Scholar
Page, Raymond I. 1999. An Introduction to English Runes. Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer.Google Scholar
Palliser, David M. 2000. Introduction. In Palliser, David M. (ed.), The Cambridge Urban History of Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–15.10.1017/CHOL9780521444613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puttenham, George. 1589. The arte of English poesie Contriued into three bookes: the first of poets and poesie, the second of proportion, the third of ornament. London: Richard Field. EEBO 2. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A68619.0001.001.Google Scholar
Samuels, Michael L. 1971. Kent and the Low Countries. In Aitken, A. J., McIntosh, Angus and Palsson, Herman (eds.), Edinburgh Studies in English and Scots. London: Longman, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Samuels, Michael L. 1985. The great Scandinavian belt. In Eaton, Roger, Fischer, Olga, Koopman, Willem F. and van der Leek, Frederike (eds.), Papers from the Fourth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Amsterdam, 10–13 April, 1985. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 269–281.10.1075/cilt.41.20samCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2013. Investigating historical variation and change in written documents: new perspectives. In Chambers, Jack K. and Schilling, Natalie (eds.), Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Second edition. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 57–81.10.1002/9781118335598.ch3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Albert H. 1956. English Place-name Elements. English Place-name Society, Vols. xxv–vi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Jeremy. 2004. John Gower and London English. In Echard, Sîan (ed.), A Companion to Gower. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, pp. 61–72.Google Scholar
Stenroos, Merja. 2016. Regional language and culture: the geography of Middle English linguistic variation. In Machan, Tim (ed.), Imagining Medieval English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 100–125.10.1017/CBO9781107415836.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenroos, Merja. 2019. Langage o northrin lede: Northern Middle English as a written medium. In Auer, Anita and Renevey, Denis (eds.), Revisiting the Medieval North of England. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, pp. 39–57.10.2307/jj.14491515.10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenroos, Merja. 2020a. The ‘vernacularisation’ and ‘standardisation’ of local administrative writing in late and post-medieval England. In Wright, Laura (ed.), The Multilingual Origins of Standard English. Berlin: Mouton, pp. 39–85.10.1515/9783110687545-003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenroos, Merja. 2020b. Land documents as a source of word geography. In Stenroos and Thengs (eds.), pp. 175–202.Google Scholar
Stenroos, Merja. 2021. What, if anything, are Middle English dialects? Some thoughts on a changing concept. In Vezzosi, Letizia (ed.), Current Issues in Medieval England. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 217–244.Google Scholar
Stenroos, Merja and Thengs, Kjetil V.. 2020a. Local documents as source material for the study of late medieval English. In Stenroos, Merja and Thengs, Kjetil V. (eds.), Records of Real People: Linguistic Variation in Middle English Local Documents. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 3–21.10.1075/ahs.11.01steCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenroos, Merja and Thengs, Kjetil V.. 2020b. The geography of Middle English documentary texts. In Stenroos, Merja and Thengs, Kjetil V. (eds.), Records of Real People: Linguistic Variation in Middle English Local Documents. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 69–92.10.1075/ahs.11.04steCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, Henry. 1876. Dialects and prehistoric forms of Old English. Transactions of the Philological Society 16: 543–569.10.1111/j.1467-968X.1876.tb00069.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thengs, Kjetil V. 2013. English medieval documents of the North-West Midlands: a study in the language of a real space text corpus. PhD dissertation, University of Stavanger.Google Scholar
Tolkien, J. R. R. 1934. Chaucer as a philologist: The Reeve’s Tale. Transactions of the Philological Society 33.1: 1–70.10.1111/j.1467-968X.1934.tb01091.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toon, Thomas E. 1983. The Politics of Early Old English Sound Change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Toon, Thomas E. 1992. Old English dialects. In Richard, M. Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. I: The Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 409–451.10.1017/CHOL9780521264747.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townend, Matthew. 2002. Language and History in Viking Age England. Turnhout: Brepols.10.1484/M.SEM-EB.5.106296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme. 2005. The social context of Kentish raising: issues in Old English sociolinguistics. International Journal of English Studies 5.1: 59–76.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1999. The Dialects of England. Second edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Upton, Clive. 2006. Modern regional English in the British Isles. In Mugglestone, Lynda (ed.), The Oxford History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 305–333.Google Scholar
Wakelin, Martyn. 1982. Evidence for spoken regional English in the sixteenth century. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 5: 1–25.Google Scholar
Williamson, Keith. 2004. On chronicity and space(s) in historical dialectology. In Dossena, Marina and Lass, Roger (eds.), Methods and Data in English Historical Dialectology. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 97–136.Google Scholar
Wilson, Richard M. 1959. The provenance of the Vespasian Psalter gloss: the linguistic evidence. In Clemoes, Peter (ed.), The Anglo-Saxons: Studies in Some Aspects of Their History and Culture Presented to Bruce Dickins. London: Bowes and Bowes, pp. 292–310.Google Scholar

References

Archer, Ian W. 2008. Smith, Sir Thomas (1513–1577), scholar, diplomat, and political theorist. In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/25906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Nathan. 1721. A Universal Etymological English Dictionary. Fifth edition, 1731. London: E. Bell.Google Scholar
Baker, Donald C. 1984. Frederick James Furnivall. In Paul, G. Ruggiers (ed.), Editing Chaucer: The Great Tradition. Norman, OK: Pilgrim, pp. 157–179.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan. 1999. English Pronunciation in the Eighteenth Century: Thomas Spence’s ‘Grand Repository of the English Language’. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198237815.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beal, Joan. 2004. ‘Marks of disgrace’: attitudes to non-standard pronunciation in eighteenth-century English pronouncing dictionaries. In Dossena, Marina and Lass, Roger (eds.), Methods and Data in English Historical Dialectology. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 329–349.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan. 2008. ‘Shamed by your English?’ The market value of a good pronunciation. In Beal, Joan, Nocera, Carmela and Sturiale, Massimo (eds.), Perspectives on Prescriptivism. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 21–40.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan. 2010a. An Introduction to Regional Englishes: Dialect Variation in England. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748629374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beal, Joan. 2010b. Prescriptivism and the suppression of variation. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Eighteenth-Century English: Ideology and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–37.10.1017/CBO9780511781643.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boberg, Charles, Nerbonne, John and Watt, Dominic (eds.). 2017. The Handbook of Dialectology. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118827628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blount, Thomas. 1656. Glossographia; or a Dictionary, interpreting all such Hard Words. London: Printed by The Newcomb. Repr. Menston: The Scolar Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Brewer, Charlotte. Forthcoming. English dictionaries from the eighteenth century onwards. In Beal (ed.), NCEL, Vol. III: Transmission, Change and Ideology.Google Scholar
Brewer, Charlotte and Turton, Stephen (eds.). 2022–. Murray Scriptorium. www.murrayscriptorium.org.Google Scholar
Bullokar, John. 1616. An English Expositor: Teaching the Interpretation of the Hardest Words in our Language. London: Iohn Legatt.Google Scholar
Chambers, Jack and Schilling, Natalie (eds.). 2013. Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Second edition. Malden, MA/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118335598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dieth, Eugen. 1946. A new survey of English dialects. Essays and Studies 32: 72–104.Google Scholar
Dobson, Eric John. 1968 [1957]. English Pronunciation 1500–1700. Second edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dollinger, Stefan. Forthcoming. The lexical profile of English in Canada. In Schilling, Denis and Hickey (eds.), NCHEL, Vol. V: North America and the Caribbean.Google Scholar
Ellis, Alexander. 1869–1889. On Early English Pronunciation. 5 vols. London: Philological Society and Early English Text Society/Asher and Truebner. Vol. V (1889).Google Scholar
Fairer, David. 1986. Anglo-Saxon Studies. In Sutherland, L. S. and Mitchell, Leslie (eds.), The History of the University of Oxford (1688–1800), Vol V. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 807–829.Google Scholar
Fisiak, Jacek (ed.). 1988. Historical Dialectology: Regional and Social. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110848137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frawley, William J. (ed.). 2004. International Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gelling, Margaret. 2002. Kenneth Cameron 1922–2001. Proceedings of the British Academy 115: 103–116. www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/371/115p103.pdf.Google Scholar
Gil, Alexander. 1972 [1619]. Logonomia Anglicana. Ed. Danielsson, Bror and Gabrielson, Arvid. Trans. R. C. Alston. 2 vols. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Gilliver, Peter. 2016. The Making of the Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283620.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gneuss, Helmut. 1972. The origin of standard Old English and Æthelwold’s school at Winchester. Anglo-Saxon England 1: 63–68.10.1017/S0263675100000089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Görlach, Manfred. 1995. Dialect lexis in early modern dictionaries. In Görlach, Manfred (ed.), New Studies in the History of English. Heidelberg: Winter, pp. 82–127.Google Scholar
Graham, Timothy (ed.). 2000. The Recovery of Old English: Anglo-Saxon Studies in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, Medieval Institute Publications.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2007. Irish English: History and Present-Day Forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511551048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2017. Dialectology, philology and historical linguistics. In Boberg, Nerbonne and Watt (eds.), pp. 23–38.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond (ed.). 2015. Researching Northern English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/veaw.g55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kökeritz, Helge. 1937. Robert Eugen Zachrisson in memoriam. Studia Neophilologica 10.1: 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393273708586804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. 1755. Dictionary of the English Language. London: Printed for W. Strahan for J. and P. Knapton.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, Thomas Raynesford. 1897 [1879]. History of the English Language. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Maguire, Warren. 2012. Mapping the existing phonology of English dialects. Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 20: 84–107.10.1515/dialect-2012-0006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, Warren. Forthcoming. Dialects, dialectology and history of English. In Hickey (ed.), NCHEL, Vol. IV: English in Britain, Ireland and Europe.Google Scholar
Miller, Stephen. 1993. The ‘philological labours’ of Prince Louis Lucien Bonaparte (1813–1891). Henry Sweet Society for the History of Linguistic Ideas Bulletin 21.1: 2–5.10.1080/02674971.1993.11745418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Momma, Haruko. 2015. From Philology to English Studies Language and Culture in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mugglestone, Lynda. 2007. Talking Proper: The Rise and Fall of the English Accent as Social Symbol. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199250622.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, J. and Murray, H. M. R.. 1910–1911. English language. In Encyclopaedia Britannica. Eleventh edition, pp. 587–600. www.britannica.com.Google Scholar
Orton, Harold and Dieth, Eugen (eds.). 1962–1971. Survey of English Dialects: Basic Materials. 4 vols. Leeds: Arnold & Son.Google Scholar
Oxford Dictionary of National Biography: www.oxforddnb.com.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary: OED Online. www.oed.com.Google Scholar
Penhallurick, Robert. 2009. Dialect dictionaries. In Cowie, Anthony (ed.), The Oxford History of English Lexicography, Vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 290–313.Google Scholar
Peyton, V. C. 1771. The History of the English Language; deduced from its origin, and traced through its different stages and revolutions. London: R. Hilton.Google Scholar
Puttenham, George. 1589. The Arte of English Poesie. London: Richard Field.Google Scholar
Pyles, Thomas and Algeo, John. 2004. The Origins and Development of the English Language. Fifth edition. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Ray, John. 1969 [1674]. A Collection of English Words not Generally Used. London: Printed for Christopher Wilkinson. Repr. Menston: The Scolar Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Robins, Robert Henry. 1964. General Linguistics: An Introductory Survey. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Robinson, Robert. 1617. The Art of Pronunciation. London: Nicholas Okes. In Alston, R. C. (ed.), English Linguistics 1500–1800: A Collection of Facsimile Reprints No. 150. Menston: The Scolar Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Roper, Jonathan. 2018. The clergyman and the dialect speaker: some Sussex examples of a nineteenth-century research tradition. In Wright, Laura (ed.), Southern English Varieties Then and Now. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 110–131.10.1515/9783110577549-005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruano-García, Javier. 2009. Looking for regional words in late seventeenth-century England: Bishop White Kennett and his glossary to Parochial Antiquities (1695). SEDERI (Yearbook of the Spanish and Portuguese Society for English Renaissance Studies) 19: 151–173.Google Scholar
Ruano-García, Javier. 2010. Early Modern Northern English Lexis: A Literary Corpus-Based Study. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rydén, Mats. 1999. Axel Erdmann: Sweden’s first professor of English. In Guy, A. Tops, J., Devriendt, Betty and Geukens, Steven (eds.), Thinking English Grammar: To Honour Xavier Dekeyser, Professor Emeritus. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 297–305.Google Scholar
Savage, W. H. 1833. The Vulgarisms and Improprieties of the English Language. London: T. S. Porter.Google Scholar
Shorrocks, Graham. 1991. A. J. Ellis as dialectologist: a reassessment. Historiographica Linguistica 18.2–3: 321–334.10.1075/hl.18.2-3.05shoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skeat, Walter. 1912. English Dialects from the Eighth Century to the Present Day. New York: Kraus Reprint Co.Google Scholar
Stein, Gabriele. 1997. John Palsgrave as a Renaissance Linguist: A Pioneer in Vernacular Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oso/9780198235057.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strabone, Jeff. 2018. Poetry and British Nationalisms in the Bardic Eighteenth Century: Imagined Antiquities. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-95255-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tengstrand, Erik. 1965. In memoriam: Eilert Ekwall. Studia Neophilologica 37.1: 199–201.10.1080/00393276508587335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolkien, J. R. R. 1934. Chaucer as a philologist: The Reeve’s Tale. Transactions of the Philological Society 33.1: 1–70.10.1111/j.1467-968X.1934.tb01091.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1999. The Dialects of England. Second edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Turner, James. 2014. Philology: The Forgotten Origins of the Modern Humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.2307/j.ctt5hhrxfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upton, Clive, Sanderson, Stewart and Widdowson, John. 1987. Word Maps: A Dialect Atlas of England. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Upton, Clive and Widdowson, John. 2006. An Atlas of English Dialects. Second edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wakelin, Martyn. 1987. The treatment of dialect in English dictionaries. In Burchfield, Robert (ed.), Studies in Lexicography. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 156–177.Google Scholar
Wales, Katie. 2006. Northern English: A Social and Cultural History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511487071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wales, Katie. 2010. Northern English in writing. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Varieties of English in Writing: The Written Word as Linguistic Evidence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 61–80.10.1075/veaw.g41.04walCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, John. 1968 [1791]. A Critical Pronouncing Dictionary and Expositor of the English Language. London. In Alston, R. C. (ed.), English Linguistics 1500–1800: A Collection of Facsimile Reprints. No. 117. Repr. Menston: The Scolar Press, 1968.Google Scholar
West, Geoffrey. 2009. Bonaparte, Louis Lucien (1813–1891), philologist. In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/96959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Joseph (ed). 1898–1905. English Dialect Dictionary. 5 vols. Oxford: Frowde.Google Scholar
Wright, Laura. 2008. Social attitudes towards Londoners’ front-glide insertion after velar consonants and before front vowels. In Sturiale, Massimo, Beal, Joan and Nocera, Carmen (eds.), Perspectives on Prescriptivism. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 215–235.Google Scholar
Wright, Laura. 2020a. A critical look at accounts of how English standardised. In Wright (ed.), pp. 17–38.Google Scholar
Wright, Laura. 2020b. Rising living standards, the demise of Anglo-Norman and mixed-language writing, and Standard English. In Wright (ed.), pp. 486–515.Google Scholar
Wright, Laura (ed.). 2020c. The Multilingual Origins of Standard English. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110687545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyld, Henry. 1921. English Philology in English Universities, An Inaugural Lecture Delivered in the Examination Schools on February 2, 1921. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://archive.org/details/englishphilology00wyld/page/10/mode/2up.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The PDF of this book conforms to version 2.0 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic (A) level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.

Structural and Technical Features

ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×