Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-7jgsp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-27T18:34:32.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - ‘Bad Data’: The Case for Early Audio Records

from Part III - Genre and Medium in the Record

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2025

Merja Kytö
Affiliation:
Uppsala Universitet, Sweden
Erik Smitterberg
Affiliation:
Uppsala Universitet, Sweden
Get access

Summary

The lexicalised use of the term ‘bad data’ in present-day sociolinguistics refers to fragmentary material which is the only data for a certain source, for example a historical stage of a variety/language. Although far from ideal, such data can nonetheless yield significant insights if examined and assessed judiciously. In this chapter two quite different cases are considered to illustrate how one can proceed with such data. The first considers the development of Voice Onset Time in Received Pronunciation, embodied in the recorded speeches of English monarchs, while the second looks at how supraregional accents of Irish English changed between the late nineteenth and the mid twentieth century by appraising the changes in pronunciation across generations of speakers, which resulted from shifts in political and cultural status and which were subsequently mirrored by shifts in linguistic identity.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
The New Cambridge History of the English Language
Documentation, Sources of Data and Modelling
, pp. 559 - 585
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anita, Auer, Schreier, Daniel and Watts, Richard J. (eds.). 2015. Letter Writing and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1994. Watching English Change. An Introduction to the Study of Linguistic Change in Standard Englishes in the Twentieth Century. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bekker, Ian. 2017. Earlier South African English. In Hickey (ed.), 2017e, pp. 464483.Google Scholar
Carr, Philip. 2020. English Phonetics and Phonology. Third edition. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cho, Taehong and Ladefoged, Peter. 1999. Variation and universals in VOT: evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics 27: 207229.10.1006/jpho.1999.0094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Felicity and Palethorpe, Sallyanne. 2017. Open vowels in historical Australian English. In Hickey (ed.), 2017e, pp. 502528.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan. 2014. Gimson’s Pronunciation of English. Eighth edition. London: Hodder Education.10.4324/9780203784969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Docherty, Gerard. 1992. The Timing of Voicing in British English Obstruents. Berlin: Foris.10.1515/9783110872637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Docherty, Gerard. 2021. Phonological innovation in contemporary spoken British English. In Kirkpatrick, Andy (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes. Second edition. London: Routledge, pp. 5977.Google Scholar
Docherty, Gerard, Watt, Dominic, Llamas, Carmen, Hall, Damien and Nycz, Jennifer. 2011. Variation in Voice Onset Time along the Scottish–English border. Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong, August 2011. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong, pp. 591594.Google Scholar
Dossena, Marina and van Ostade, Ingrid Tieken-Boon (eds.). 2008. Studies in Late Modern English Correspondence. Methodology and Data. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Fabricius, Anne. 2017. Twentieth-century Received Pronunciation: prevocalic /r/. In Hickey (ed.), 2017e, pp. 3965.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2002. The Familiar Letter in Early Modern English. A Pragmatic Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan. 2006. An acoustic analysis of ‘happy-tensing’ in the Queen’s Christmas broadcasts. Journal of Phonetics 34: 439457.10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan. 2010. Phonetic Analysis of Speech Corpora. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan, Palethorpe, Sallyanne and Watson, Catherine. 2000. Monophthongal vowel changes in Received Pronunciation: an acoustic analysis of the Queen’s Christmas Broadcasts. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 30.1/2: 6378.10.1017/S0025100300006666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henton, Caroline. 1983. Changes in the vowels of Received Pronunciation. Journal of Phonetics 11: 353371.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30835-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 1984. Coronal segments in Irish English. Journal of Linguistics 20.2: 233251.10.1017/S0022226700013876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2003. What’s cool in Irish English?: linguistic change in contemporary Ireland. In Tristram, Hildegard L. C. (ed.), Celtic Englishes III. Heidelberg: Winter, pp. 357373.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2004a. A Sound Atlas of Irish English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2004b. The phonology of Irish English. In Kortmann, Bernd and Upton, Clive (eds.), Handbook of Varieties of English. Vol. 1: Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 6897.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2009. Weak segments in Irish English. In Minkova, Donka (ed.), Phonological Weakness in English. From Old to Present-Day English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 116129.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2014. The Sound Structure of Modern Irish. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2016. English in Ireland: development and varieties. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Sociolinguistics in Ireland. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 340.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2017a. Analysing early audio recordings. In Hickey (ed.), 2017e, pp. 112.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2017b. Twentieth-century Received Pronunciation: stop articulation. In Hickey (ed.), 2017e, pp. 6684.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2017c. Early recordings of Irish English. In Hickey (ed.), 2017e, pp. 199231.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2017d. The development of recording technology. In Hickey (ed.), 2017e, pp. 562568.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond (ed.). 2017e. Listening to the Past. Audio Records of Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781107279865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2019. Mining vernacular correspondence for linguistic insights. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Keeping in Touch. Emigrant Letters across the English-Speaking World. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 124.10.1075/ahs.10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2023a. Sounds of English Worldwide. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781119131304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2023b. The pronunciation of English in Ireland. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Irish English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 121143.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel. 1956 [1909]. The Pronunciation of English. Fourth edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel. 1964 [1918]. An Outline of English Phonetics. Ninth edition. Cambridge: W. Heffer.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1.1: 97120.10.1017/S0047404500006576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. I: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter and Johnson, Keith. 2011. A Course in Phonetics. Sixth edition. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Lisker, Leigh and Abramson, Arthur S.. 1964. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: acoustical measurements. Word 20: 384422.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 1999. Making the best use of ‘bad’ data: evidence for sociolinguistic variation in Early Modern English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 100.4: 499533.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu and Tanskanen, Sanna-Kaisa (eds.). 2007. Letter Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Originally published as a special issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5.2 (2004).10.1075/bct.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reetz, Henning and Allard, Jongman. 2020. Phonetics: Transcription, Production, Acoustics, and Perception. Second edition. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2003. The dynamics of New Englishes: from identity construction to dialect birth. Language 79.2: 233281.10.1353/lan.2003.0136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English. Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511618901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreier, Daniel. 2019. /h/ insertion as a ‘camouflaged archaism’?: dialect contact, colonial lag and the feature pool in South Atlantic English. Diachronica 36.1: 3664.Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane, Rathcke, Tamara, Sonderegger, Morgan and Macdonald, Rachel. 2015. A real-time study of plosives in Glaswegian using an automatic measurement algorithm: change or age-grading? In Torgersen, Eivind Nessa, Hårstad, Stian, Mæhlum, Brit and Røyneland, Unn (eds.), Language Variation – European Perspectives V. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 225238.10.1075/silv.17.17stuCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Erik. 2011. Sociophonetics. An Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Upton, Clive. 2008. Received Pronunciation. In Kortmann, Bernd and Upton, Clive (eds.), Varieties of English 1: The British Isles. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 237252.Google Scholar
Walker, John. 1815 [1791]. A Critical Pronouncing Dictionary and Expositor of the English Language. London: Robinson and Cadell.Google Scholar
Watt, Dominic and Yurkova, Jillian. 2007. Voice Onset Time and the Scottish Vowel Length Rule in Aberdeen English. Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Saarbrücken: University of Saarbrücken, pp. 15211524.Google Scholar
Wells, John. 1982. Accents of English. Vol. 2: The British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611759CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The PDF of this book conforms to version 2.0 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic (A) level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.

Structural and Technical Features

ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×