Future of Radio and Communication

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139192255.007

6 - Future of Radio and Communication

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2014

Olli Ikkala and

R. Kaunisto and

Tapani Ryhänen: Affiliation:
Nokia Research Center, Cambridge
Mikko A. Uusitalo: Affiliation:
Nokia Research Center, Helsinki
Olli Ikkala: Affiliation:
Helsinki University of Technology
Asta Kärkkäinen: Affiliation:
Nokia Research Center, Cambridge
A. Pärssinen: Affiliation:
Nokia Research Center
R. Kaunisto: Affiliation:
Nokia Research Center
A. Kärkkäinen: Affiliation:
Nokia Research Center

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

Rapid progress in radio systems since the early 1990s has fundamentally changed all human communication. Mobile phones and the Internet have enabled globalization of both private and business communication and access to information. This has required increased data rates and capacity as well as the means to achieve a reliability similar to that of wireline systems. On the other hand, the importance of local information whether it is the opening hours of a local shop or finding friends in the vicinity will increase the role of short-range radios.

New forms of mobile communication, e.g. location-based services, will increase the need for enhanced performance of connectivity. In the future everything will be connected through embedded intelligence. Not only will people be communicating but things will also be connected. The first step toward the Internet of Things is to enhance the usability of the current devices by better connection to the services. All the capacity that can be provided is likely to be used. The hype about ubiquitous communication will not be realized unless extremely cheap, small, low-power wireless connection devices can be created for personal area and sensor networks. The goal is to have data rates which are comparable to wireline connections today. This will require very wide bandwidths with radio frequency (RF) operation frequencies in the gigahertz range.

However, a wider bandwidth is not the only way to obtain more capacity. As discussed later in this chapter, cognitive radio will provide a new paradigm to embed intelligence not only at the application level but also in the radio connectivity. In brief, it promises to share radio spectrum autonomously and more dynamically than previously, thus allowing better spatial spectrum efficiency, i.e., more capacity using the same bandwidth.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Nanotechnologies for Future Mobile Devices , pp. 174 - 212

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192255.007 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1] C. E., Shannon, Communication in the presence of noise, Proc. IRE, 37, 10-21, Jan. 1949.Google Scholar

[2] J., Mitola and G. Q., Maguire, Cognitive radio: Making software radios more personal, IEEE Pers. Commun., 6, 13-18, 1999.Google Scholar

[3] S., Haykin, Cognitive radio: Brain-empowered wireless communications, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 23, 201-220, 2005.Google Scholar

[4] B., Razavi, RF Microelectronics, Prentice Hall, 1998.Google Scholar

[5] H., Zimmermann, OSI reference model the ISO model of architecture for open systems interconnection, IEEE Trans. Commun., 28, 425-432, 1980.Google Scholar

[6] R. H., Walden, Analog-to-digital converter survey and analysis, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 17, 539-550, 1999.Google Scholar

[7] P., Elorantaet al., Direct-digital RF-modulator: A multi-function architecture for a system-independent radio transmitter, IEEE Commun. Mag., 46, 14-151, 2008.Google Scholar

[8] K., van Berkelet al., Vector processing as an enabler for software-defined radio in handheld devices, EURASIP J. Appl. Signal Processing, issue 16, 2613-2625, 2005.Google Scholar

[9] A. A., Abidi, The path to the software-defined radio receiver, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 42, 954-966, 2007.Google Scholar

[10] U., Ramacher, Software-defined radio prospects for multistandard mobile phones, IEEE Computer, 40, 62-69, 2007.Google Scholar

[11] C., Kocabaset al., Radio frequency analog electronics based on carbon nanotube transistors, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 105, no. 5, 1405-1409, 2008.Google Scholar

[12] S., Datta, Quantum Transport, Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

[13] P., Burke, AC performance of nanoelectronics: towards a ballistic THz nanotube transistor, Solid-State Electronics, 48, 1981-1986, 2004.Google Scholar

[14] P., Burkeet al., Quantitive theory of nanowire and nanotube antenna performance, IEEE Trans. Nanotechnology, 5, no. 4, 314-334, 2006.Google Scholar

[15] S., Hasanet al., High-frequency performance projections for ballistic carbon-nanotube transistors, IEEE Trans. Nanotechnology, 5, no. 1, 14-22, 2006.Google Scholar

[16] D., Wang, Ultrahigh frequency carbon nanotube transistor based on a single nanotube, IEEE Trans. Nanotechnology, 6, no. 4, 400-403, 2007.Google Scholar

[17] M., Reznikovet al., Temporal correlation of electrons: suppresson of shotnoise in aballistic quantum point contact, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, no. 18, 3340-3343, 1995.Google Scholar

[18] C., Caves, Quantum limits on noise in linear amplifiers, Phys. Rev. D, 26, no. 8, 1817-1839, 1982.Google Scholar

[19] K., Jensenet al., Nanotube radio, Nano Lett., 7, 374, 2007.Google Scholar

[20] M. P., Anantram and F., Leonard, Physics of carbon nanotube electronic devices, Rep. Prog. Phys., 69, 507-561, 2006.Google Scholar

[21] J. F., Davis, High-Q Mechanical Resonator Arrays Based on Carbon Nanotubes, IEEE, 2003.Google Scholar

[22] J., Kinaretet al., A carbon-nanotube-based nanorelay, Appl. Phys. Lett., 82, no. 8, 1287-1289, 2003.Google Scholar

[23] V., Sazonovaet al., A tunable carbon nanotube electromechanical oscillator, Nature, 431, 284-287, 2004.Google Scholar

[24] H., Penget al., Ultrahigh frequency nanotube resonators, Phys. Rev. Lett., 97, 087203, 2006.Google Scholar

[25] P., Ikonen, Artificial electromagnetic composite structures in selected microwave applications, Dissertation, Helsinki University of Technology, 2007.Google Scholar

[26] P. R., Wallace, The bandt heory of graphite, Phys. Rev., 71, 622-634, 1947.Google Scholar

[27] K. S., Novoselovet al., Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films, Science, 306, 666-669, 2004.Google Scholar

[28] Y., Zhanget al., Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry's phase in graphene, Nature, 438, 201, 2005.Google Scholar

[29] S. V., Morozovet al., Strong suppression of weak localization in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett., 97, 016801, 2006.Google Scholar

[30] J. S., Bunch, et al., Impermeable atmoc membranes from graphene sheets, Nano Lett., 2008.Google Scholar

[31] M. Y., Hanet al., Energy band-gap engineering of graphene nanoribbons, Phys. Rev. Lett., 98, 206805, 2007.Google Scholar

[32] J. R., Williams, L., DiCarlo, and C. M., Marcus, Quantum Hall effect in gate-controlled p–n junction of graphene, Science, 317, 638-641, 2007.Google Scholar

[33] S. Y., Zhouet al., Substrate-induced bandgap opening in epitaxial graphene, Nature Mater., 6, 770, 2007.Google Scholar

[34] H., Minet al., Intrinsic and Rashba spin-orbit interactions in graphene sheets, Phys. Rev. B, 74, 165310, 2006.Google Scholar

[35] C. H., Parket al., Anisotropic behaviours of massless Dirac fermions in graphene under periodic potential, Nature Phys., 4, 213-217, 2008.Google Scholar

[36] R., Ruizet al., Density multiplication and improved lithography by directed block copolymer assembly, Science, 321, 936-939, 2008.Google Scholar

[37] F., Varchonet al., Electronic structure of epitaxial graphene layers on SiC: effect of the substrate, Phys. Rev. Lett., 99, 126805, 2007.Google Scholar

[38] V. C., Tunget al., High-throughput solution processing of large-scale graphene, Nature Nanotech., 4, 25-29, 2009.Google Scholar

[39] K. S., Kimet al., Large-scale pattern growth of graphene films for stretchable transparent electrodes, Nature, 457, 706-710, 2009.Google Scholar

[40] M. C., Lemmeet al., A graphene field effect device, IEEE Electron Dev. Lett., 28, 282-284, 2007.Google Scholar

[41] Y.-M., Linet al., Operation of graphene transistors at GHz frequencies, Phys. Rev. B, 2008.Google Scholar

[42] J., Kedzierskiet al., Epitaxial graphene Transistors on SiC substrates, IEEE Trans Electron Dev., 55, 2078-2085, 2008.Google Scholar

[43] V V, Cheianov, V., Fal'ko, and B. L., Altshuler, The focusing of electron flow and a veselago lens in graphene pn-junctions, Science, 315, 1252, 2007.Google Scholar

[44] F., Traversi, V., Russo, and R., Sordan, Integrated complementary graphene inverter, arXiv:0904.2745v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 17 Apr 2009.

[45] J. S., Bunchet al., Electromechanical resonators from graphene sheets, Science, 26, 490-493, 2007.Google Scholar

[46] S. S., Verbridgeet al., High quality factor resonance at room temperature with nanostrings under high tensile stress, J. Appl. Phys., 99, 2006.Google Scholar

[47] M. A., Sillanpaaet al., Direct observation of Josephson capacitance, Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 206-806, 2005.Google Scholar

[48] M., Arroyo, and T., Belytschko, Finite element method for the non-linear mechanics of crystalline sheets and nanotubes, Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng., 59, 419-456, 2004.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.