Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T13:58:50.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 14 - Outcomes, Controversies, and Future Trends

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2024

By
Julia Metzner  and
Karen B. Domino
Edited by
Richard D. Urman  and
Alan David Kaye
Richard D. Urman
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Alan David Kaye
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

The incidence of sedation-related complications for procedures is unknown, as mandatory reporting of outcomes is lacking. However, two sources of information are available that can shed light on the risks of sedation encountered in non-operating-room locations.

Type
Chapter
Information
Moderate and Deep Sedation in Clinical Practice , pp. 182 - 193
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Havidich, JE, Cravero, JP. The current status of procedural sedation for pediatric patients in out-of-operating room locations. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2012;25:453–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cravero, JP, Blike, GT, Beach, M, et al. Incidence and nature of adverse events during pediatric sedation/anesthesia for procedures outside the operating room: report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. Pediatrics. 2006;118:1087–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhananker, SM, Posner, KL, Cheney, FW, et al. Injury and liability associated with monitored anesthesia care: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:228–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzner, J, Posner, KL, Domino, KB. The risk and safety of anesthesia in remote locations: the US closed claims analysis. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22:502–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metzner, J, Domino, KB. Risks of anesthesia or sedation outside the operating room: the role of the anesthesia care provider. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010;23:523–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). Standards for basic anesthetic monitoring. Affirmed December 13, 2020 (last amended October 20, 2010). www.asahq.org/standards-and-practice-parameters/standards-for-basic-anesthetic-monitoringGoogle Scholar
Pino, RM. The nature of anesthesia and procedural sedation outside of the operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007;20:347–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soto, RG, Fu, ES, Vila, H, Miguel, RV. Capnography accurately detects apnea during monitored anesthesia care. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:379–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Krauss, B, Hess, DR. Capnography for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50:172–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, JL, Junkins, E, Pribble, C, Guenther, E. Capnography and depth of sedation during propofol sedation in children. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49:9–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deitch, K, Miner, J, Chudnofsky, CR, et al. Does end tidal CO2 monitoring during emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia with propofol decrease the incidence of hypoxic events? A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;55:258–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qadeer, M, Vargo, JJ, Dumot, JA, et al. Capnographic monitoring of respiratory activity improves safety of sedation for endoscopic cholangiopancreatography and ultrasonography. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:1568–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qadeer, MA, Vargo, JJ, Patel, S, et al. Bispectral index monitoring of conscious sedation with the combination of meperidine and midazolam during endoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:102–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agrawal, D, Feldman, HA, Krauss, B, Waltzman, ML. Bispectral index monitoring quantifies depth of sedation during emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;43:247–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dominguez, TE, Helfaer, MA. Review of bispectral index monitoring in the emergency department and pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006;22:815–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schilling, D, Rosenbaum, A, Schweizer, S, et al. Sedation with propofol for interventional endoscopy by trained nurses in high-risk octogenarians: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Endoscopy. 2009;41:295–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McQuaid, KR, Laine, L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials of moderate sedation for routine endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:910–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cote, GA, Hovis, RM, Ansstas, MA, et al. Incidence of sedation-related complications with propofol use during advanced endoscopic procedures. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:137–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fatima, H, DeWitt, J, LeBlanc, J, et al. Nurse-administered propofol sedation for upper endoscopic ultrasonography. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1649–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rex, DK, Deenadayalu, VP, Eid, E, et al. Endoscopist-directed administration of propofol: a worldwide safety experience. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:1229–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, H, Poluha, W, Cheung, M, et al. Propofol for sedation during colonoscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(4):CD006268.Google Scholar
Rex, DK, Heuss, LT, Walker, JA, Qi, R. Trained registered nurses/endoscopy teams can administer propofol safely for endoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2005;129: 1384–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheriyan, DG, Byrne, MF. Propofol use in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:5171–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dere, K, Sucullu, I, Budak, ET, et al. A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation, pain and hemodynamic control, during colonoscopy under conscious sedation. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:648–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The European Society of Anaesthesiology task force on the use of nitrous oxide in clinical anaesthetic practice. The current place of nitrous oxide in clinical practice: An expert opinion-based task force consensus statement of the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015;32(8):517–20.Google Scholar
Robertson, AR, Kennedy, NA, Robertson, JA, Church, NI, Noble, CL. Colonoscopy quality with Entonox® vs intravenous conscious sedation: 18608 colonoscopy retrospective study. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;9:471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newton, A, Fitton, L. Intravenous ketamine for adult procedural sedation in the emergency department: a prospective cohort study. Emerg Med J. 2008;25:498–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
David, H, Shipp, J. A randomized controlled trial of ketamine/propofol versus propofol alone for emergency department procedural sedation. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57:435–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miner, JR, Moore, JC, Austad, EJ, et al. Randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial of propofol, 1:1 propofol/ketamine, and 4:1 propofol/ketamine for deep procedural sedation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2015;65:479–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bahrami Gorji, F, Amri, P, Shokri, J, et al. Sedative and analgesic effects of propofol–fentanyl versus propofol–ketamine during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2016;22:e39835.Google Scholar
The Anesthetic and Analgesic Drug Products Advisory Committee. Oliceridine briefing document. www.fda.gov/media/121230/downloadGoogle Scholar
Goudra, B, Mason, KP. Emerging approaches in intravenous moderate and deep sedation. J Clin Med. 2021;10:1735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanious, MK, Beutler, S, Urman, RD. New hypnotic drug development and pharmacologic considerations for clinical anesthesia. Review. Anesthesiol Clin. 2017;35:e95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonik, LJ, Goldwater, DR, Kilpatrick, GJ, et al. A placebo- and midazolam-controlled phase I single ascending-dose study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of remimazolam (CNS 7056): part I. Safety, efficacy, and basic pharmacokinetics. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:274–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rex, DK, Bhandari, R, Desta, T, et al. A phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of remimazolam (CNS 7056) compared with placebo and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:427–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mandel, JE, Tanner, JW, Lichtenstein, GR, et al. A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of patient-controlled sedation with propofol/remifentanil versus midazolam/fentanyl for colonoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:434–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodrigo, MR, Irwin, MG, Tong, CK, Yan, SY. A randomised crossover comparison of patient-controlled sedation and patient-maintained sedation using propofol. Anaesthesia. 2003;58:333–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goudra, B, Singh, PM, Failure of SEDASYS: destiny or poor design? Anesth Analg. 2017;124:686–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, N, van Heusden, K, Gorges, M, et al. Design and evaluation of a closed-loop anesthesia system with robust control and safety system. Anesth Analg. 2018;127:883–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×