Feedback stabilization for the Navier–Stokes equations: theory and calculations

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139235792.008

7 - Feedback stabilization for the Navier–Stokes equations: theory and calculations

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2012

A.V. Fursikov and

Edited by

José L. Rodrigo and

A.V. Fursikov: Affiliation:
Moscow State University
A.A. Kornev: Affiliation:
Moscow State University
James C. Robinson: Affiliation:
University of Warwick
José L. Rodrigo: Affiliation:
University of Warwick
Witold Sadowski: Affiliation:
Uniwersytet Warszawski, Poland

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Abstract This paper considers the feedback stabilization problem for the Navier-Stokes equations defined in a bounded domain. Control via a forcing term (both distributed and impulsive) supported in a subdomain, via the initial condition, and via boundary conditions are studied, and relationships between these different kinds of control are presented. The precise meaning of ‘feedback control’ is discussed, and a feedback map providing control via the state variable is constructed for initial and distributed control (in the latter case for the linear Oseen equations only). Numerical algorithms for the calculation of stable invariant manifolds and projection operators on these sets are discussed. Finally the results of a numerical stabilization of a particular fluid flow are presented.

Introduction

The aim of this paper is to give a relatively short presentation of mathematical and numerical results concerning stabilization of the Navier-Stokes equations by feedback control. A description of the mathematical stabilization construction will be accompanied by a discussion of how mathematical notions of stabilization theory can be adapted to calculations.

Control theory for partial differential equations has been developed very intensively over the last few decades, and is now a very wide and farreaching field, even if one excludes extremal theory for partial differential equations. For some idea of this field more broadly, see the recent books by Coron (2007) and Tucsnak & Weiss (2009), as well as the earlier survey in Fursikov & Imanuilov (1999), together with the references in these publications.

The stabilization problem for the 2D Navier-Stokes system by a feedback distributed control supported in the whole fluid domain was studied by Barbu & Sritharan (1998).

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Mathematical Aspects of Fluid Mechanics , pp. 130 - 172

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235792.008 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anosov, D.V. (1959) A Multidimensional Analog of an Hadamard Theorem. Nauchn. Dokl. Vyssh. Shkoly. Fiz.-Mat. Nauki. no. 1, 3–12.

Anosov, D.V. (1967) Geodesic Flows on Closed Riemannian Manifolds of Negative Curvature. Tr. Mat. Inst. im. V.A. Steklova, Akad. Nauk SSSR, 90.

Babin, A.V. & Vishik, M.I. (1992) Attractors of Evolution Equations. North-Holland, Amsterdam, London, New York, Tokyo.

Barbu, V. (2003) Feedback stabilization of Navier–Stokes equations. ESAIM: Control, Optimization and Calculus of Variation 9, 197–205.Google Scholar

Barbu, V. & Sritharan, S.S. (1998) H∞-control theory of fluid dynamics. Proc. R. Soc. Lond.A 454, 3009–3033.

Barbu, V. & Triggiani, R. (2004) Internal stabilization of Navier–Stokes equations with finite-dimensional controllers. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 53, no. 5, 1443–1494.Google Scholar

Barbu, V., Lasiecka, I., & Triggiani, R. (2006) Abstract setting of tangential boundary stabilization of Navier–Stokes equations by high- and low-gain feedback controllers. Nonlinear Analysis 64, no. 12, 2704–2746.Google Scholar

Barbu, V., Rodrigues, S., & Shirikyan, A. (2011) Internal exponential stabilization to a non-stationary solution for 3D Navier–Stokes equations. SIAM J. Control Optim. 49, 1454–1478.Google Scholar

Chizhonkov, E.V. (2003) Numerical aspects of one stabilization method. Russ. J. Numer. Anal. and Math. Modelling 18, no. 5, 363–376.Google Scholar

Chizhonkov, E.V. (2004) On projection operators for numerical stabilization. Num. Meth. and Programming 5, 161–169.Google Scholar

Chizhonkov, E.V. & Ivanchikov, A.A. (2004) On numerical stabilization of solutions of Stokes and Navier–Stokes equations by the boundary conditions. Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modelling 19, no. 6, 477–494.Google Scholar

Coron, J.M. (1999) On null asymptotic stabilization of the two-dimensional incompressible Euler equations in a simply connected domains. SIAM J. Control Optim. 37, no. 6, 1874–1896.Google Scholar

Coron, J.M. (2007) Control and Nonlinearity. Math. Surveys and Monographs 136 AMS, Providence, RI.

Daletskiy, Yu.L. & Krein, M.G. (1974) Stability of solutions for differential equations in Banach space. Translation of Math. Monographs 43. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI.

Danilov, S.D., Dolzhanskii, F.V., Dovzenko, V.A., & Krymov, V.A. (1996) An advanced investigation of interaction of allocated quasi-two-dimensional vortices. Chaos 6, no 3, 297–308.Google Scholar

Duan, J. & Fursikov, A.V. (2005) Feedback stabilization for Oseen fluid equations: a stochastic approach. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 7, 574–610.Google Scholar

Fursikov, A.V. (2000) Optimal control of Distributed Systems. Theory and Applications. Transl. of Math. Monographs 187, AMS, Providence, RI.

Fursikov, A.V. (2001a) Stabilizability of quasilinear parabolic equation by feedback boundary control. Sbornik: Mathematics 192, no. 4, 593–639.Google Scholar

Fursikov, A.V. (2001b) Stabilizability of two-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations with help of boundary feedback control. J. of Math. Fluid Mechanics 3, 259–301.Google Scholar

Fursikov, A.V. (2001c) Feedback stabilization for the 2D Navier–Stokes equations, in The Navier–Stokes equations: theory and numerical methods. Lecture Notes in pure and appl. Math. 223, Marcel Dekker, Inc., NewYork, Basel, 179–196.

Fursikov, A.V. (2002a) Feedback stabilization for the 2D Oseen equations: additional remarks, in Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Control of Distributed Parameter Systems. International series of numerical mathematics. 143, Birkhäser Verlag, 169–187.

Fursikov, A.V. (2002b) Real process corresponding to 3D Navier–Stokes system and its feedback stabilization from boundary. Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser.2, 206, Advances in Math. Sciences-51. PDE M.Vishik seminar, 95–123.Google Scholar

Fursikov, A.V. (2002c) Real Processes and Realizability of a Stabilization Method for Navier–Stokes Equations by Boundary Feedback Control, in Nonlinear Problems in Mathematical Physics and Related Topics II, In Honor of Professor O.A. Ladyzhenskaya, Kluwer/Plenum Publishers, New-York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow, 137–177.

Fursikov, A.V. (2004) Stabilization for the 3D Navier–Stokes system by feedback boundary control. Discrete and Cont. Dyn. Syst. 10, no. 1&2, 289–314.Google Scholar

Fursikov, A.V. (2010) Local Existence Theorems with Unbounded Set of Input Data and Unboundedness of Stable Invariant Manifolds for 3D Navier–Stokes Equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems Series S, 3, no. 2, 269–290.Google Scholar

Fursikov, A.V. & Imanuvilov, O.Yu. (1995) On controllability of certain systems simulating a fluid flow. IMA Vol. Math. Appl. 68, 149–184.Google Scholar

Fursikov, A.V. & Imanuvilov, O.Yu. (1996) Controllability of evolution equations. Lecture Notes Ser. Seoul (Global Anan. Res. Ctr.) 34, 1–163.Google Scholar

Fursikov, A.V. & Imanuilov, O.Yu. (1999) Exact controllability of Navier–Stokes and Boussinesq equations. Russian Math. Surveys 54, no. 3, 565–618.Google Scholar

Hartman, P. (1964) Ordinary differential equations. John Wiley & Sons, NewYork, London, Sydney.

Henry, D. (1981) Geometric Theory of Semilinear Parabolic Equations. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 840, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

Hirsch, M., Pugh, C., & Shub, M. (1977) Invariant manifolds. Lectures notes in Math. 583, Springer, Berlin.

Ivanchikov, A.A. (2006) On numerical stabilization of unstable Couette flow by the boundary conditions. Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modelling 21, no. 6, 519–537.Google Scholar

Ivanchikov, A.A., Kornev, A.A., & Ozeritskii, A.V. (2009) On a new approach to asymptotic stabilization problems. Zh. Vychisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz. 49, no. 12, 2167–2181. [Comp. Math. and Math. Phys. (2009) 49, 12, 2070–2084]Google Scholar

Kalinina, A.B. (2006) Numerical realization of the method of functionalanalytic series for projecting on a stable manifold. Num. Meth. and Programming 7, no. 1, 65–72.Google Scholar

Kornev, A.A. (2003) On the stability theory of semidynamical systems. Tr. mat. tsentra im. N.I. Lobachevskogo, Kazan' 20, 3–30. [in Russian]Google Scholar

Kornev, A.A. (2004) On an iterative method for the construction of Hadamard Mustaches. Zh. Vychisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz. 44, 1346–1355 [Comput. Math. Math. Phys. (2004) 44, 1274–1283].Google Scholar

Kornev, A.A. (2005) Classification of methods of approximate projection onto a stable manifold. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. 400, 736–738 [Dokl. (2005) 71, 124–126].

Kornev, A.A. (2006) The method of asymptotic stabilization to a given trajectory based on a correction of the initial data. Zh. Vychisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz. 46, no. 1, 37–51 [Comput. Math. Math. Phys. (2006) 46, 1, 34–48].Google Scholar

Kornev, A.A. (2007) A method of graph transformation type for numerical simulation of invariant manifolds. Trydi Mat. Inst. im. V.A. Steklova 256, 237–251. [Proc. of Steklov Inst. of Math. (2007) 256, 223–237]Google Scholar

Kornev, A.A. (2008) A problem asymptotic stabilization by the right-hand side. Russ. J. Numer. Anal. and Math. Modelling 23, no 4, 407–422.Google Scholar

Kornev, A.A. & Ozeritskii, A.V. (2010) Nonlocal stabilization of trajectories of saddle type. Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modelling 25, no. 16, 545–561.Google Scholar

Ladyzhenskaya, O.A. (1963) The Mathematical Theory of Viscous Incompressible Flow. Gordon and Breach, New York.

Ladyzhenskaya, O.A. & Solonnikov, V.A. (1973) On linearization principle and invariant manifolds for problems of magnetic hydromechanics. Zap. Nauchn. cem. LOMI 38, 46–93. [in Russian]Google Scholar

Marsden, J.E. & McCracken, M. (1976) The Hopf Bifurcation and Its Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York.

Pesin, Ya.M. (1977) Characteristic Lyapunov Exponents and Smooth Ergodic Theory. Usp. Mat. Nauk 32, no. 4 (196), 55–112.Google Scholar

Raymond, J.-P. (2006) Feedback boundary stabilization of the twodimensional Navier–Stokes equations. SIAM J. Control Optimization 45, no. 3, 709–728.Google Scholar

Raymond, J.-P. (2007) Feedback boundary stabilization of the threedimensional incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. J. Math. Pures Appl. 87, no. 6, 627–669.Google Scholar

Raymond, J.-P. & Thevenet, L. (2010) Boundary feedback stabilization of the two dimensional Navier–Stokes equations with finite dimensional controllers. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical SystemsA 27, no. 3, 1159–1187.Google Scholar

Ravindran, S.S. (2007) Stabilization of Navier–Stokes equations by boundary feedback. Intern. J. of Num. Analysis and Modelling 4, no. 3–4, 608–624.Google Scholar

Shil'nikov, L.P., Shil'nikov, A.L., Turaev, D.V., & Chua, L. (2004) Qualitative Theory of Nonlinear Systems. Izhevsk, Part 1 [in Russian].

Temam, R. (1984) Navier–Stokes Equations: Theory and Numerical Analysis. North Holland, Amsterdam.

Tucsnak, M. & Weiss, G. (2009) Observation and Control for Operator Semigroups. Birkhäuser Verlag AG, Basel, Boston, Berlin.

Yudovich, V.I. (1989) The Linearization Method in Hydrodynamical Stability Theory. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs, 74, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.

Vazquez, R. & Krstic, M. (2008) Control of turbulent and Magnetohydrodynamic Channel Flow. Boundary Stabilization and State Estimation. Birkhäuser Boston, Basel, Berlin.

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.