<span class='italic'>Shared content within the</span> Sendgericht <span class='italic'>corpus of manuscripts</span>

Alice Hicklin; Steffen Patzold; Bastiaan Waagmeester; Charles West

Appendix 4: - Shared content within the Sendgericht corpus of manuscripts

from Appendices

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 October 2025

Alice Hicklin ,

Steffen Patzold ,

Bastiaan Waagmeester and

Charles West

Show author details

Alice Hicklin: Affiliation:
King’s College London
Steffen Patzold: Affiliation:
Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Germany
Bastiaan Waagmeester: Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin
Charles West: Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh

Book contents

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Local Priests in the Latin West, 900–1050 , pp. 240 - 246

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009575379 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2025
Creative Commons: This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

Appendix 4: Shared content within the Sendgericht corpus of manuscripts

These tables show which texts are present in which Sendgericht manuscripts, as discussed in Chapter 5.

Table A.2

A. Synodal material	K2	S	C	M1	M2	P	H	T
1. Augsburger SendordnungFootnote ^a				69r-70v	119r-120v	78r-79rFootnote ^b	142v-144v	176v-177rFootnote ^c
2. Ordo local synodFootnote ^d	170v-171v	147v-148v	43r-44r					158r-159v
3. Admonitio synodalisFootnote ^e								159v-162v
4. Admonitio sacerdotum			50v-51v					162v-163v
5. Ammonicione ad presbiterosFootnote ^f							51r-53r
6. Sermo synodalisFootnote ^g					123v-126v		147r-151r

^a Koeniger, Sendgerichte, pp. 191–4; Krause, ‘Münchener Handschriften’, pp. 118–20.

^b Due to missing folia, it only contains the latter half.

^c Only the questionnaires found at the end, not the ordo itself.

^d De Clercq, Législation religieuse franque, pp. 407–10.

^e West, ‘Admonitio Synodalis’, pp. 374–80.

^f Zachová, ‘Adhortace’, pp. 287–9.

^g MGH Ordines, pp. 539–42.

Table A.3

B. Canonical material	K1 (pp.)	K2	S	C	M1	M2	P	H	T
1. Letter Hrabanus to ReginbaldFootnote ^a	33-45	151r-158r	134v-139r		19r-24r	70r-77v	55v-61v	94r-101r
2. Letter Hrabanus to HumbertFootnote ^b	45-49	158r-160v	139r-141r		24r-26r	77v-80r	61v-64r	101v-104v
3. Decretal Nicholas IFootnote ^c	49-51	160v-2vFootnote ^d	141r-142r
4. Letter Gregory the GreatFootnote ^e	52-53				26r	80v-81r	64r-65r	104v-5v	177rFootnote ^f
5. Canons Council of Mainz (852)Footnote ^g	53	163r-4vFootnote ^h	142rvFootnote ⁱ 143v-144r		26v-27r	81r	65r	105v-6r
6. Canons Council of Worms (868)Footnote ^j	104-21	165v-6vFootnote ^k	144v-145r	31v-43rFootnote ^l	53rvFootnote ^m	81v-128v	13vFootnote ⁿ 69v-70v 71r-73r	106r-52vFootnote ^o

^a MGH Epp. 5, pp. 448–54.

^b Footnote Ibid., pp. 444–8.

^c MGH Epp. 6, pp. 670–1 (JE 2710). Part of addition to Paenitentiale ad Heribaldum, see Kottje, Bußbücher, pp. 131–4.

^d Excerpt of MGH Epp. 6, pp. 675–7 (JE †2709), omits part of the introduction and c. 5 on murdering priests.

^e MGH Epp. 2, c. 5, pp. 335–6 (JE 1843).

^f Footnote Ibid., c. 1, p. 333.

^g MGH Conc. 3, cc. 9–10, pp. 247–8.

^h Footnote Ibid., cc. 9–10, 11, 13 and 6, pp. 243–5 and 247–50.

ⁱ Footnote Ibid.

^j MGH Conc. 4, pp. 259–82. Also, Hartmann, Konzil von Worms, pp. 14–5 on K1, C, M1, M2, P and H.

^k MGH Conc. 4, cc. 16, 5 and 36, pp. 270–1, 265–6 and 278.

^l Without cc. 15, 40, 44–5.

^m Incomplete due to missing pages.

ⁿ 181 canons attributed to the Council of Worms (868). Due to missing folia, only MGH Conc. 4, cc. 13–25 and 32–43, pp. 268–74 and 276–81 remain.

^o Footnote Ibid.

Table A.4

C. Episcopal statutes	K1 (pp.)	K2	S	M1	M2	P	H	T
1. Hincmar of Reims 1Footnote ^a	126-135			60r-63v	109r-113rFootnote ^b	77rvFootnote ^c	132v-137rFootnote ^d
2. Hincmar of Reims 2Footnote ^e				63v-64v	113r-114v		137r-138v
3. Theodulf of Orléans 1Footnote ^f				55r-60r	101v-109r	76vFootnote ^g	125v-132v	164r-75vFootnote ^h
4. Gerbald of Liège 1Footnote ⁱ					259v		279v
5. Gerbald of Liège 2		123v-126rFootnote ^j
6. Gerbald of Liège 3Footnote ^k		122r-123vFootnote ^l 171v-172rFootnote ^m	148v-149v
7. Haito of Basel				4v-5rFootnote ⁿ
8. Waltcaud of Liège		126r-127vFootnote ^o
9. Herard of ToursFootnote ^p				68v-69r	118v		142r	177rvFootnote ^q
10. Capitula Trecensia								209rFootnote ^r
11. Capitula MonacensiaFootnote ^s				65rv 69rFootnote ^t	114v-115v 118v-119rFootnote ^u		138v-139v 142vFootnote ^v

^a MGH Capit. episc. 2, pp. 34–45.

^b Footnote Ibid., cc. 1–7 and 10–17, pp. 34–7 and 39–45.

^c Footnote Ibid. (cc. 1b–7 and 10–11. The rest is missing).

^d See n. a.

^e MGH Capit. episc. 2, cc. 1–20, pp. 45–70.

^f MGH Capit. episc. 1, cc. 1–20, 45a, 21–7a, pp. 103–16, 141 and 117–24.

^g Due to missing folia, only part of the introduction remains.

^h MGH Capit. episc. 1, pp. 103–42. The praefatio and c. 1 merged into one entry, and cc. 22 and 45 both split in two entries.

ⁱ Footnote Ibid., cc. 7, 8 and 4, pp. 17–18. The authenticity of these statutes is contested, see Chapter 5, p. 197, n. 94

^j Footnote Ibid., pp. 26–32. Numbered as cc. 1–15 and 17–18, but the text is complete.

^k Footnote Ibid., pp. 37–42.

^l Numbered as cc. 1–14, 16–21, but the text is complete.

^m Footnote Ibid., cc. 1–7, pp. 37–9.

ⁿ Footnote Ibid., cc. 1–8, pp. 210–12. Added later and incomplete.

^o Footnote Ibid., pp. 45–9.

^p MGH Capit. episc. 2, cc. 101–3, 132–3 and 135, pp. 149 and 155–6.

^q Footnote Ibid., cc. 132, 135, 133, 7, 101 and 3, pp. 155–6, 129 and 149.

^r MGH Capit. episc. 3, pp. 169–71.

^s Footnote Ibid., pp. 162–5.

^t Footnote Ibid., cc. 15–16, p. 165.

^u Footnote Ibid.

^v Footnote Ibid.

Table A.5

D. Penitential material	K1 (pp.)	K2	S	C	M1	M2	P	H	T
1. Penitential of Pseudo-Bede			116vFootnote ^a
2. Penitential of Pseudo-Egbert									268vFootnote ^b
3. Penitentiale Pseudo-Bedae- EgbertiFootnote ^c	135-155 95-99			11v-31v	38r-52v	15r-40v	16v-36r	45r-50v 53r-63r
4. Penitentiale ad HeribaldumFootnote ^d	55-94	129r-150v	117r-134r		6r-18vFootnote ^e	44r-69vFootnote ^f	36r-55v	63r-76r 82r-93v
5. Penitential of HalitgarFootnote ^g				1r-11v	27r-37v	1r-15r	1r-16v	30v-45r	244r-268r
6. Penitential of Pseudo-Theodore									269r-309rFootnote ^h
7. Penitentiale Trecense									309v-324rFootnote ⁱ
8. Sermo de paenitentiaFootnote ^j	101-104				66r-67r	115v-117r	[…]Footnote ^k	139v-41r

^a F. W. Wasserschleben, Die Bußordnungen der abendländischen Kirche (Halle: Graeger, 1851), p. 556; Haggenmüller, Überlieferung, p. 99. It is a later addition.

^b Wasserschleben, Bußordnungen, pp. 246–7, ch. 16.

^c Haggenmüller, Überlieferung, pp. 67–8, 57, 74–6, 94–5 and 63–4.

^d Kottje, Bußbücher, pp. 29, 31, 57, 37, 39, 53 and 27.

^e Missing c. 10 due to a missing folium.

^f Capitula 2 is taken from Halitgar’s penitential (5.2).

^g Kottje, Bußbücher, pp. 19 (3.7–5.17, folia missing at the beginning), 37 (prologue, praefatio, 3–5.17), 38 (prologue, praefatio, 3–5.17), 53 (prologue, praefatio, 3, 4.1–30, 5.1–17), 26 (prologue, praefatio, 3, 4.3–34, 5.1–17), 64 (praefatio, 1.1–17).

^h C. van Rhijn (ed.), Paenitentiale pseudo-Theodori, CCSL 156 B (Turnhout: Brepols, 2009), p. lvii.

ⁱ Meens, ‘Continuing Carolingian Reform’, pp. 35–53.

^j Caesarius of Arles, Sermones, pp. 272–4. Here falsely attributed to Augustine.

^k Folia are missing, but the sermon is present in the table of contents, see P, f. 68v.

Table A.6

E. Tables of content

K1 (pp.)

54-55

104-106

135-137

3v-18r

128r-129r

150v-151r

162v-163r 171v

3v-15r 118v-119r 134rv

142v

153rv

14rv

33v-34v

18v

29v

32rv

35v

43r

53rv

6r-7r

11v

22v-23v

45v-46v 69v-70r 81v-85v 160r-162v 183v-186r 206r-207r 218r-219v 231r-232v 248rv

254r

256r-257r 264r-268r

7r-9v

65r-68v

98r-100v 118v-120r 130v-132r 144r-145r 158r-160r

1r-5r

7r-29v

94r

152v-154v 184r-186r 205v-208r 227r-228r 237r-238v 253r-254r

266v-267v 273rv

276r-277r 283r-287r

40v-41r

41v-44r 269rv

313rv

314r

¹ In compiling this list, we have consulted Schröder, Die westfränkischen Synoden; Mazel, L’évêque; and M. Boye, ‘Quellenkatalog der Synoden Deutschlands und Reichsitaliens von 922–1059’, Neues Archiv der Gesellschaft für ältere deutsche Geschichtskunde 48 (1930), pp. 45–96, as well as checking the CEMA online database of charters. An exception is no. 52, issued ‘in concilio publico’, which is ambiguous, but we have followed Boye’s lead in including it as a diocesan synod.

Footnotes