Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-p4db6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-09T23:40:57.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2025

Jaqueline Mariña
Jaqueline Mariña
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Indiana
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Kant's Metaphysics of the Will
Freedom, Reason, and the Moral Law
 , pp. 214 - 224
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adams, Robert Merrihew (1997). “Things in Themselves.” In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57.4, pp. 801–825.10.2307/2953804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allais, Lucy (2015). Manifest Reality: Kant’s Idealism and His Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747130.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (1973). The Kant-Eberhard Controversy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (1990). Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139172295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (1996). Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant’s Theoretical and Practical Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139172875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (2001a). “Ethics, Evil, and Anthropology in Kant: Remarks on Allen Wood’s: Kants Ethical Thought.” In: Ethics 111.3, pp. 594–613.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (2001b). Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Modern European Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511612671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (2004). Kant’s Transcendental Idealism. Revised and enlarged edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.10.2307/j.ctt1cc2kjcCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (2011). Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691531.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (2020). Kant’s Conception of Freedom: A Developmental and Critical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316535196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl (2003). Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl (2000a). Kant and the Fate of Autonomy: Problems in the Appropriation of the Critical Philosophy. Modern European Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl (2000b). Kant’s Theory of Mind: An Analysis of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason. Second edition Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198238975.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, and Höffe, Otfried, eds. (2009). Kant’s Moral and Legal Philosophy. The German Philosophical Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511581618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson-Gold, Sharon, and Muchnik, Pablo, eds. (2010). Kant’s Anatomy of Evil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aune, Bruce (1979). Kant’s Theory of Morals. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Basile, Giovanni Pietro, and Lyssy, Ansgar, eds. (2022). System and Freedom in Kant and Fichte. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781003044376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Manfred (2014). “Sittengesetz und Freiheit. Kant 1785 und 1788.” In: Kants Rechtfertigung des Sittengesetzes in Grundlegung iii. Ed. Puls, Heiko. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 209–225.10.1515/9783110365894.209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxley, Anne Margaret (2010). Kant’s Theory of Virtue: The Value of Autocracy. Modern European Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White (1963). A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah (1969). Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford Paperbacks, 116. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bittner, Rudiger (1974). “Maximen.” In: Akten des 4. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses: Mainz, 6-10 April 1974. Ed. Gerhard Funke. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 485–498.10.1515/9783110878707-057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breazeale, Daniel (2001). “J. G. Fichte: Review of Leonhard Creuzer: Skeptical Reflections on the Freedom of the Will (1793).” In: The Philosophical Forum 32.4, pp. 289–296.Google Scholar
Breitenbach, Angela (2004). “Langton on Things in Themselves: A Critique of Kantian Humility.” In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35.1, pp. 137–148.10.1016/j.shpsa.2003.12.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Talbot (2002a). “Maxims and Virtues.” In: The Philosophical Review 111.4, pp. 539–572.10.1215/00318108-111-4-539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Talbot (2002b). “The Real Problem with Internalism about Reasons.” In: Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32.4, pp. 443–473.10.1080/00455091.2002.10716526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchdahl, Gerd (1992). Kant and the Dynamics of Reason: Essays on the Structure of Kant’s Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cholbi, Michael (2016). Understanding Kant’s Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316681459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen L. (2006). The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dean, Richard (2006). The Value of Humanity in Kant’s Moral Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199285721.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deligiorgi, Katerina (2012). The Scope of Autonomy: Kant and the Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646159.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, Lara (2001). Moral Self-Regard: Duties to Oneself in Kant’s Moral Theory. Studies in Philosophy. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Denis, Lara ed. (2010). Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Cambridge Critical Guides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dietrichson, Paul (1969). “Kant’s Criteria of Universalizability.” In: Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals: Text and Critical Essays. Ed. Robert Paul Wolff. The Bobbs-Merrill Text and Commentary Series, 7. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, pp. 163–207.Google Scholar
Dyck, Corey (2014). Kant and Rational Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199688296.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen (1992). “The Concept of the Highest Good in Kant’s Moral Theory.” In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52.4, pp. 747–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen (2002). “The Inner Freedom of Virtue.” In: Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. Ed. Mark Timmons. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 289–315.10.1093/oso/9780198250098.003.0012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen (2009). The Form of Practical Knowledge: A Study of the Categorical Imperative. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674053793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb et al. (1962). J. G. Fichte-Gesamtausgabe Der Bayerischen Akademie Der Wissenschaften. In collab. with Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Friedrich Frommann Verlag.Google Scholar
Firestone, Chris L., ed. (2017). Kant and the Question of Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316337813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, Owen J., and Rorty, Amélie, eds. (1990). Identity, Character, andMorality: Essays in Moral Psychology. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3645.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Manfred (2004). The Philosophical Foundations of Early German Romanticism. SUNY Series Intersections-philosophy and Critical Theory. Albany: State University of New York Press.10.1353/book4754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankena, William (1958). “Obligation and Motivation in Recent Moral Philosophy.” In: Essays in Moral Philosophy. Ed. A. I. Melden. Seattle: University of Washington Press, pp. 40–81.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry G. (1988). The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511818172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, Paul W. (2005). All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael (2013). Kant’s Construction of Nature: A Reading of the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139014083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frierson, Patrick R. (2003). Freedom and Anthropology in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frierson, Patrick R. (2014). Kant’s Empirical Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fugate, Courtney D. (2012). “On a Supposed Solution to the Reinhold/Sidgwick Problem in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals.” In: European Journal of Philosophy 23.3, pp. 349–373.Google Scholar
Funke, Gerhard, ed. (1974). Akten des 4. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses: Mainz, 6.–10. April 1974. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110878707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, Ido (2015). “How Are the Different Formulas of the Categorical Imperative Related?” In: Kantian Review 20.3, pp. 395–419.Google Scholar
Gerhardt Volker, Matthias Weber, and Schlepelmann, Maja, eds. (2022). Immanuel Kant 1724–2024: Ein europäischer Denker. Oldenbourg: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
González, Ana Marta, and Alejandro, G. Vigo, eds. (2019). Reflexion, Gefühl, Identität im Anschluss an Kant = Reflection, Emotion, Identity from Kant Onwards. Philosophische Schriften Band 96. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.10.3790/978-3-428-55778-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenberg, Jeanine (2013). Kant’s Defense of Common Moral Experience: A Phenomenological Account. Modern European Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139520126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grier, Michelle (2001). Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion. Modern European Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul, ed. (1992). The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL0521365872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul ed. (1998). Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: Critical Essays. Critical Essays on the Classics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2000). Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2005). Kant’s System of Nature and Freedom: Selected Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273461.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul ed. (2006). The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL052182303XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2007). “Naturalistic and Transcendental Moments in Kant’s Moral Philosophy.” In: Inquiry 50.5, pp. 444–464.10.1080/00201740701612309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2009). “Problems with Freedom: Kant’s Argument in Groundwork III and Its Subsequent Emendations.” In: Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Ed. Jens Timmermann. Cambridge Critical Guides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 176–202.10.1017/CBO9780511770760.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul ed. (2010). The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL9780521883863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, John E. (1996). The Moral Gap: Kantian Ethics, Human Limits, and God’s Assistance. Oxford Studies in Theological Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1977). Faith and knowledge. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin et al. (2008). Being and Time. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Thought.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (1975). “Die Deduktion des Sittengesetzes.” In: Denken im Schatten des Nihilismus: Festschrift f. Wilhelm Weischedel z. 70. Geburtstag am 11. Apr. 1975. Ed. Wilhelm Weischedel and Alexander Schwan. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft [Abt. Verl.], pp. 55–112.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (1994). The Unity of Reason: Essays on Kant ’s Philosophy. Ed. Richard, L. Velkley. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter, and Förster, Eckart (1997). The Course of Remembrance and Other Essays on Hölderlin. Stanford Series in Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9781503623866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, Barbara (1993). The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge: Harvard UniversityPress.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. (1992). Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant’s Moral Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. (1998). “Kant’s Argument for the Rationality of Moral Conduct.” In: Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: Critical Essays. Ed. Guyer, Paul. Critical Essays on the Classics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Höffe, Otfried (1977). “Kants Kategorischer Imperativ als Kriterium des Sittlichen.” In: Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 31.3, pp. 354–384.Google Scholar
Höffe, Otfried ed. (1979). Ethik Und Politik: Grundmodelle und Probleme der Praktischen Philosophie. 1. Aufl. Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft 266. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Höffe, Otfried (1994). Immanuel Kant. SUNY Series in Ethical Theory. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Hogan, Desmond (2009a). “How to Know Unknowable Things in Themselves.” In: Noûs 43.1, pp. 49–63.10.1111/j.1468-0068.2008.01695.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, Desmond (2009b). “Noumenal Affection.” In: Philosophical Review 118.4, pp. 501–532. (2009c). “Three Kinds of Rationalism and the Non-spatiality of Things in Themselves.” In: Journal of the History of Philosophy 47.3, pp. 355–382.10.1353/hph.0.0130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, Desmond (2013). “Metaphysical Motives of Kant’s Analytic-Synthetic Distinction.” In: Journal of the History of Philosophy 51.2, pp. 267–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, Desmond (2021). “Leibniz and Kant on Divine Causation.” In: Leibniz and Kant. Ed. Brandon Look. First edition. Oxford Scholarship Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horn, Christoph, Schönecker, Dieter, and Mieth, Corinna, eds. (2006). Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110204551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horstmann, Rolf-Peter (1995). Die Grenzen der Vernunft: eine Untersuchung zu Zielen und Motiven des Deutschen Idealismus. 2. Aufl. Neue wissenschaftliche Bibliothek. Weinheim: Beltz Athenäum.Google Scholar
Hume, David, Selby-Bigge, L. A., and Nidditch, P. H. (1978). A Treatise of Human Nature. Second edition. Oxford: New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1969). Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals: Text and Critical Essays. Ed. Wolff, Robert Paul. Trans. Lewis White Beck. The Bobbs-Merrill Text and Commentary Series 7. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2008). Die Elektronische Edition der Schriften Immanuel Kants. Essen: Korpora. www.korpora.org/kant/.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, et al. (2002). Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant in Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Ameriks, Karl, and Naragon, Steve (1997). Lectures on Metaphysics. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant in Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107049505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, and Mary, J. Gregor (1996). Practical Philosophy. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, and Guyer, Paul (2005). Notes and Fragments. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant in Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, et al. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Walford, David, and Meerbote, Ralf (2002). Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1770. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant in Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Allen, W. Wood, and Giovanni, George Di (1996). Religion and Rational Theology. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511814433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, and Young, J. Michael (1992). Lectures on Logic. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant in Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511810039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, et al. (2007). Anthropology, History, and Education. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant in Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerstein, Samuel J. (2002). Kant’s Search for the Supreme Principle of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Patricia (2011). Kant’s Thinker. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199754823.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemme, Heiner et al., eds. (2006). Moralische Motivation: Kant und die Alternativen. Kant-Forschungen Bd. 16. Hamburg: F. Meiner.Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. (2014). “Freiheit oder Fatalismus? Kants positive und negative Deduktion der Idee der Freiheit in der Grundlegung (und seine Kritik an Christian Garves Antithetik von Freiheit und Notwendigkeit).” In: Kants Rechtfertigung des Sittengesetzes in Grundlegung III. Ed. Heiko Puls. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 59–102.10.1515/9783110365894.59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. (1989). “Personal Identity and the Unity of Agency: A Kantian Response to Parfit.” In: Philosophy & Public Affairs 18.2, pp. 101–132.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. (1996). Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. (2008). The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552733.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. (2009). Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552795.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, Katharina T. (2020). Kant on Self-Knowledge and Self-Formation: The Nature of Inner Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108874304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laberge, Pierre (1982). “L’espèce de Cercle Dont, à Ce Qu’il Semble, Il n’y a Pas Moyen de Sortir.” In: Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue canadienne de philosophie 21.4, pp. 745–753.Google Scholar
Langton, Rae (1998). Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves. Oxford: New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lipscomb, Benjamin, Bruxvoort, J., and Krueger, James, eds. (2010). Kant’s Moral Metaphysics: God, Freedom, and Immortality. New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110220049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice (1998). Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691214122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice (2017). I, Me, Mine: Back to Kant, and Back Again. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665761.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Look, Brandon, ed. (2021). Leibniz and Kant. First edition. Oxford Scholarship Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199606368.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louden, Robert B. (2000). Kant’s Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195130416.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louden, Robert B. (2011). Kant’s Human Being: Essays on His Theory of Human Nature. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199768714.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyssy, Ansgar, and Yeomans, Christopher, eds. (2021). Kant on Morality, Humanity, and Legality: Practical Dimensions of Normativity. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-54050-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Richard (2009). Kant’s Theory of Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567720.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Richard (1993). “Kantian Moral Motivation and the Feeling of Respect.” In: Journal of the History of Philosophy 31.3, pp. 421–435.10.1353/hph.1993.0050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Georg Friedrich (1749). Georg Friedrich Meiers öffentlichen Lehrers der Weltweisheit zu Halle Versuch eines neuen Lehrgebäudes von den Seelen der Thiere. In collab. with Wellcome Library. Halle: Verlegts Carl Herrmann Hemmerde.Google Scholar
Melden, A. I., ed. (1958). Essays in Moral Philosophy. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Merritt, Melissa (2018). Kant on Reflection and Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108344005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalson, Gordon E., ed. (2014). Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge Critical Guides. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139088138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mieth, Corinna, and Rosenthal, Jacob (2006). “Freedom Must Be Presupposed as a Property of All Rational Beings.” In: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Ed. Christoph Horn, Dieter Schönecker, and Corinna Mieth. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 247–284.10.1515/9783110204551.4.247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohr, Georg (1991). Das sinnliche Ich: innerer Sinn und Bewusstsein bei Kant. Epistemata Bd. 81. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Munzel, G. Felicitas (1999). Kant’s Conception of Moral Character: The “Critical” Link of Morality, Anthropology, and Reflective Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Neiman, Susan (1997). The Unity of Reason: Rereading Kant. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm, and Kaufmann, Walter (1974). The Gay Science: With a Prelude in Rhymes and an Appendix of Songs. First edition New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Nisenbaum, Karin Alina (2018). For the Love of Metaphysics: Nihilism and the Conflict of Reason from Kant to Rosenzweig. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190680640.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noller, Jörg, and Walsh, John, eds. and trans. (2022). Kant’s Early Critics on Freedom of the Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108687720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuzzo, Angelica (2008). Ideal Embodiment: Kant’s Theory of Sensibility. Studies in Continental Thought. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (1975). Acting on Principle: An Essay on Kantian Ethics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (1983). “I. Kant after Virtue.” In: Inquiry 26.4, pp. 387–405.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (1989). Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Papish, Laura (2018). Kant on Evil, Self-Deception, and Moral Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190692100.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, Derek (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pasternack, Lawrence, ed. (2002). Immanuel Kant: Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals in Focus. Routledge Philosophers in Focus Series. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Paton, H. J. (1947). The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk (2001). Living without Free Will. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereboom, Derk (2006). “Kant on Transcendental Freedom.” In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73.3, pp. 537–567.Google Scholar
Piché, Claude (2022). “Modal Concepts in Kant.” In: System and Freedom in Kant and Fichte. Ed. Giovanni Pietro Basile and Ansgar Lyssy. New York: Routledge, pp. 50–70.10.4324/9781003044376-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pistorius, Hermann Andreas (1786). “Hermann Andreas Pistorius, Review of Elucidations of Professor Kant’s ‘Critique of Pure Reason’ by Joh. Schulze, Royal Prussian Court Chaplain. Königsberg: Dengel, 1784. 1786.” In: Kant’s Early Critics on Freedom of the Will. Ed. Walsh, John and Noller, Jörg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–8.Google Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin (2017). Kant’s Theory of Normativity: Exploring the Space of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316412503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, Nelson (1974). “Does Kant Have Two Concepts of Freedom?” In: Akten des 4. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses: Mainz, 6.–10. April 1974. Ed. Funke, Gerhard. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 590–596.10.1515/9783110878707-069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, Nelson (1998). “The Argument of Kant’s Groundwork.” In: Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: Critical Essays. Ed. Paul Guyer. Critical Essays on the Classics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 29–49.Google Scholar
Prauss, Gerold (1974). Kant und das Problem der Dinge an sich. Abhandlungen zur Philosophie, Psychologie und Pädagogik Bd. 90. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
Proops, Ian (2003). “Kant’s Legal Metaphor and the Nature of a Deduction.” In: Journal of the History of Philosophy 41.2, pp. 209–229.Google Scholar
Puls, Heiko, ed. (2014). Kants Rechtfertigung Des Sittengesetzes in Grundlegung III: Deduktion Oder Faktum? Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110365894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puls, Heiko, (2016). Sittliches Bewusstsein Und Kategorischer Imperativ in Kants Grundlegung: Ein Kommentar Zum Dritten Abschnitt. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH.10.1515/9783110368864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauscher, Frederick (2009). “Freedom and Reason in Groundwork III.” In: Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Ed. Timmer-mann, Jens. Cambridge Critical Guides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 203–223.10.1017/CBO9780511770760.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674042605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John (1980). “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory.” In: Journal of Philosophy 77.9, pp. 515–572.10.2307/2025790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John (2000). Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Ed. Barbara Herman. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews (1989). “Kant’s Theory of Moral Sensibility. Respect for the Moral Law and the Influence of Inclination.” In: Kant-Studien 80, pp. 284–302.10.1515/kant.1989.80.1-4.284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reath, Andrews (2006). Agency and Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199288836.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reath, Andrews, and Timmermann, Jens, eds. (2010). Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge Critical Guides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511770869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C.,ed. (2012). A Plato Reader: Eight Essential Dialogues. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Reinhold, Karl Leonhard (1792). Briefe über die kantische Philosophie. Leipzig: G.J. Göschen.10.1515/9783111432151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhold, Karl Leonhard (2005). Letters on the Kantian Philosophy. Ed. Ameriks, Karl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Amélie, ed. (1976). The Identities of Persons. Topics in Philosophy 3. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520353060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, W. D. (1954). Kant’s Ethical Theory: A Commentary on the Grundlegung Zur Metaphysik Der Sitten. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Santos, Robinson dos, and Schmidt, Elke Elisabeth, eds. (2018). Realism and Antirealism in Kant’s Moral Philosophy: New Essays. Kantstudien. Ergänzungshefte Band 199. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sargentis, Konstantinos (2012). “Moral Motivation in Kant.” In: Kant Studies Online, pp. 93–121.Google Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter (2006). “How Is a Categorical Imperative Possible?” In: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Ed. Horn, Christoph, Schönecker, Dieter, and Mieth, Corinna. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 301–324.10.1515/9783110204551.4.301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter (2013). “Kant’s Moral Intuitionism: The Fact of Reason and Moral Predispositions.” In: Kant Studies Online 1, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter, and Allen, W. Wood (2002). Immanuel Kant “Grundlegung Zur Metaphysik Der Sitten”: Ein Einführender Kommentar. UTB Für Wissenschaft 2276. Paderborn: Ferdindand Schöningh.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (1841—1988). Über die Grundlage der Moral. Ed. Welsen, Peter. Bd. 4. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur, and Schirmacher, Wolfgang (1998). Philosophical Writings. German Library 27. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Sally (2008). Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: An Introduction. Cambridge Introductions to Key Philosophical Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511809538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid (1974). Essays in Philosophy and Its History. Philosophical Studies Series in Philosophy 2. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.10.1007/978-94-010-2291-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sensen, Oliver, ed. (2013). Kant on Moral Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steigleder, Klaus (2006). “The Analytic Relationship of Freedom and Morality.” In: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Ed. Christoph Horn, Dieter Schönecker, and Corinna Mieth. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 225–246.10.1515/9783110204551.4.225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratton-Lake, Philip (2000). Kant, Duty, and Moral Worth. Routledge Studies in Ethics and Moral Theory 2. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sussman, David (Mar. 2008). “From Deduction to Deed: Kant’s Grounding of the Moral Law.” In: Kantian Review 13.1, pp. 52–81.Google Scholar
The Ezra Klein Show (n.d.). What Does the “Post-Liberal Right” Actually Want? Apple Podcasts.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2007). Kants’ Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511487316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2009a). “Acting from Duty: Inclination, Reason, and Moral Worth.” In: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Ed. Jens Tim-mermann. Cambridge: Cambridge, pp. 45–62.10.1017/CBO9780511770760.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens ed. (2009b). Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Cambridge Critical Guides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511770760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2010). “Reversal or Retreat? Kant’s Deductions of Freedom and Morality.” In: Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Ed. Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–89.10.1017/CBO9780511770869.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2022b). “Das Neue in der Critik der reinen Vernunft.” In: Immanuel Kant 1724–2024: Ein europäischer Denker. Ed. Weber, Matthias and Volker, Maja Schlepel-mann Gerhardt. Oldenbourg: de Gruyter, pp. 75–82.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2022a). Kant’s Will at the Crossroads: An Essay on the Failings of Practical Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780192896032.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmons, Mark, ed. (2002). Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198250098.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tugendhat, Ernst (1993). Vorlesungen über Ethik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Uleman, Jennifer K. (2010). An Introduction to Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511801082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Platz, Jeppe (2016). “Singularity without Equivalence: The Complex Unity of Kant’s Categorical Imperative.” In: Journal of Value Inquiry 50.2, pp. 369–384.Google Scholar
Ware, Owen (2017). “Kant’s Deductions of Morality and Freedom.” In: Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47.1, pp. 116–147.10.1080/00455091.2016.1235856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, Owen (2021). Kant’s Justification of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198849933.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, Owen (2023). Kant on Freedom: Elements in the Philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009070652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric (2005). Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric (2019). Kant on Laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316683026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weischedel, Wilhelm, and Schwan, Alexander, eds. (1975). Denken im Schatten des Nihilismus: Festschrift f. Wilhelm Weischedel z. 70. Geburtstag am 11. Apr. 1975. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft [Abt. Verl.]Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. (2021). Kant’s Critical Epistemology: Why Epistemology Must Consider Judgment First. Routledge Studies in Eighteenth-Century Philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus (2006). “Practical Reason.” In: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Ed. Christoph Horn, Dieter Schönecker, and Corinna Mieth. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 121–138.10.1515/9783110204551.3.121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1976). “Persons, Character, and Morality.” In: The Identities of Persons. Ed. Rorty, Amélie and Williams, Bernard. Topics in Philosophy 3. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1981). Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers, 1973–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, T. C. (1968). The Concept of the Categorical Imperative: A Study of the Place of the Categorical Imperative in Kant’s Ethical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2020). Review of Kant’s Conception of Freedom: A Developmental and Critical Analysis. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.Google Scholar
Wood, AllenW. (1970). Kant’s Moral Religion.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, AllenW. (1984a). “Kant’s Compatibilism.” In: Self and Nature in Kant’s Philosophy. Ed. Allen, W. Wood. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 73–101.Google Scholar
Wood, AllenW. ed. (1984b). Self and Nature in Kant’s Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, AllenW. (1989). “The Emptiness of the Moral Will.” In: The Monist 72.3, pp. 454–483.10.5840/monist198972318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, AllenW. (1990). Hegel’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139172257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, AllenW. (1999). Kant’s Ethical Thought. Modern European Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, AllenW. (2006). “The Supreme Principle of Morality.” In: The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Ed. Guyer, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 342–381.10.1017/CCOL052182303X.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, AllenW. (2020). Kant and Religion. Cambridge Studies in Religion, Philosophy, and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108381512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuerth, Julian (2014). Kant on Mind, Action, and Ethics. First edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587629.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Inaccessible, or known limited accessibility

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The PDF of this book is known to have missing or limited accessibility features. We may be reviewing its accessibility for future improvement, but final compliance is not yet assured and may be subject to legal exceptions. If you have any questions, please contact accessibility@cambridge.org.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Visualised data also available as non-graphical data
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Jaqueline Mariña, Purdue University, Indiana
  • Book: Kant's Metaphysics of the Will
  • Online publication: 06 November 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009574730.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Jaqueline Mariña, Purdue University, Indiana
  • Book: Kant's Metaphysics of the Will
  • Online publication: 06 November 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009574730.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Jaqueline Mariña, Purdue University, Indiana
  • Book: Kant's Metaphysics of the Will
  • Online publication: 06 November 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009574730.010
Available formats
×