Before proceeding to the Jewish polemic against specific Christian doctrines, it is necessary to outline the theoretical basis upon which such criticism was made. The Jewish polemicists’ assertion that the central Christian dogmas were illogical and self-contradictory presupposed a firm philosophical foundation for its justification. Similarly the use of philosophical arguments implied a definite view of the relation between religion and reason. How the Jewish polemicists perceived this relationship will be discussed here.
According to the Jewish philosophical polemicists, one of the main differences between Judaism and Christianity lay in the former's conformity to reason and the latter's irrationality. To support this contention, the polemicists developed methods of distinguishing between their own doctrines, which they claimed to be rational, and Christian beliefs, which, they argued, contradicted the findings of reason. An examination of their approach will elucidate the theoretical basis of the various Jewish philosophical critiques of Christianity.
Explanations of Christian Belief in Irrational Doctrines
Jewish theologians sought, in the first place, to render an account to themselves of the phenomenon of Christian belief in rationally unacceptable doctrines. They tried to gain some psychological insight into this kind of belief by pondering the force of training and habit.
This insight appears to have been offered first by Judah Halevi (ca.1075-1141) in the opening passages of his Kuzari, a philosophical defense of Judaism. He began this work with succinct statements of the doctrines of. the philosophers, Christians, Muslims, and Jews, fictionally presented to the King of the Khazars. In rejecting, in turn, philosophy, Christianity, and Islam, the King did not, in fact, address himself to any specific doctrines. For instance, philosophy was rejected because it did not provide an answer to the King's personal quest.2 Similarly, he did not accept Islam because one of its claims to truth was based on the beauty of the Quran, which was written in a language the King did not understand. 3 In his reply to the Christian scholar, the King said:
I see here no logical conclusion; nay, logic rejects most of what you say. If both appearance and experience are so palpable that they take hold of the heart, compelling belief in a thing of which one is not convinced, they render the matter more feasible by a semblance of logic.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.