Appendix
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 October 2025
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Introductory GrantologyA Guide for Pursuing Competitive Grants, pp. 355 - 404Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
References
Note: References indicate that studies are cited in this scoping review, while texts in the bibliography indicate that studies have been synthesized but not cited due to page limits.
Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (2005). The impact of NSF support for basic research in economics. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 79/80, 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyington, J. E., Antman, M. D., Patel, K. C., & Lauer, M. S. (2016). Towards independence: Resubmission rate of unfunded national heart, lung, and blood institute R01 research grant applications among early stage investigators. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 91(4), 556–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdoul, H., Perrey, C., Amiel, P., Tubach, F., Gottot, S., Durand-Zaleski, I., & Alberti, C. (2012). Peer review of grant applications: Criteria used and qualitative study of reviewer practices. PLoS One, 7(9), e46054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abrahamson, S. (1996). Time to return medical schools to their primary purpose: education. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 71(4), 343–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alberts, B., Kirschner, M. W., Tilghman, S., & Varmus, H. (2014). Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(16), 5773–5777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, E. M. (1960). Why are research grant applications disapproved? Science, 132(3439), 1532–1534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Álvarez-Bornstein, B., Morillo, F., & Bordons, M. (2017). Funding acknowledgments in the Web of Science: completeness and accuracy of collected data. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1793–1812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D. M., & Slade, C. P. (2016). Managing institutional research advancement: Implications from a university faculty time allocation study. Research in Higher Education, 57(1), 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. H. (1999). NIH and NSF funding mechanisms applicable to interventional radiology. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 10(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arora, A., David, P., & Gambardella, A. (1997). Reputation and competence in publicly funded science. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Auranen, O., & Nieminen, M. (2010). University research funding and publication performance – An international comparison. Research Policy, 39(6), 822–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azoulay, P., Graff Zivin, J., Li, D., & Sampat, B. (2019). Public R&D investments and private-sector patenting: Evidence from NIH funding rules. The Review of Economic Studies, 86(1), 117–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Badelt, C. (2020). Private external funding of universities: Blind alley or new opening?. Review of Managerial Science, 1–12.Google Scholar
Benway, B. M., Kalidas, P., Cabello, J. M., & Bhayani, S. B. (2009). Does citation analysis reveal association between h-index and academic rank in urology? Urology, 74(1), 30–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, D. H. (2005). An introduction to obtaining extramural funding. The Journal of Surgical Research, 128(2), 226–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Best, R. K. (2012). Disease politics and medical research funding: Three ways advocacy shapes policy. American Sociological Review, 77(5), 780–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatti, J. A., Akhtar, U., Butt, B. A., & Janjua, N. Z. (2013). Presenting budget in a research grant application. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association, 63(6), 793–796.Google Scholar
Birn, A. E. (2014). Philanthrocapitalism, past and present: The Rockefeller Foundation, the Gates Foundation, and the setting(s) of the international/global health agenda. Hypothesis, 12(1), e8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, C., & Sørensen, M. (2015). The size of research funding: Trends and implications. Science and Public Policy, 42(1), 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonetta, L. (2008). Enhancing NIH grant peer review: A broader perspective. Cell, 135(2), 201–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bordage, G., & Dawson, B. (2003). Experimental study design and grant writing in eight steps and 28 questions. Medical Education, 37(4), 376–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyer, P. G. (2007). Who’s securing grants?: Demographics of full-time faculty at two-year institutions. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 31(5), 409–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, P. G., & Cockriel, I. (2001). Grant performance of junior faculty across disciplines: Motivators and barriers. Journal of Research Administration, 2(1), 19–24.Google Scholar
Boyer, P., & Cockriel, I. (1997). Factors influencing grant writing: Perceptions of tenured and nontenured faculty. SRA Journal, 29(3/4), 61–68.Google Scholar
Boyington, J. E., Antman, M. D., Patel, K. C., & Lauer, M. S. (2016). Towards independence: Resubmission rate of unfunded national heart, lung, and blood institute R01 research grant applications among early stage investigators. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 91(4), 556�562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, M. M., Losso, I. S., & Koniaris, L. G. (2010). What is the institutional financial impact of an MD-PhD program without extramural funding? Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 22(1), 56–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, G. B., & McCauley, C. (1993). Early career achievements of National Science Foundation (NSF) graduate applicants: Looking for Pygmalion and Galatea effects on NSF winners. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(5), 815–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chval, K., & Nossaman, L. (2014). Raising the bar on external research funding: Infrastructure and strategies for enhancing faculty productivity. The Journal of Faculty Development, 28(1), 41–48.Google Scholar
Connor, U., & Mauranen, A. (1999). Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European Union research grants. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordero, C., Delino, R., Jeyaseelan, , Lansang, M., Lozano, J., Kumar, S., Moreno, S., Pietersen, M., Quirino, J., Thamlikitkul, V., Welch, V., Tetroe, J., ter Kuile, A., Graham, I., Grimshaw, J., Neufeld, V., Wells, G., & Tugwell, P. (2008). Funding agencies in low- and middle-income countries: Support for knowledge translation. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 86(7), 524–534.Google ScholarPubMed
Dickler, H., Fang, D., Heinig, S., Johnson, E., & Korn, D. (2007). New physician-investigators receiving national institutes of health research project grants: A historical perspective on the “endangered species.” JAMA, 297(22), 2496–2501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickson, T., Chen, P. D., & Taylor, B. (2019). Impact of funding allocation on physical therapist research productivity and DPT student graduates: An analysis using panel data. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 24(2), 269–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dorsey, E., de Roulet, J., Thompson, J., Reminick, J., Thai, A., White-Stellato, Z., Beck, C., George, B., & Moses, H. (2010). Funding of US biomedical research, 2003–2008. JAMA, 303(2), 137–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Endicott, K. M., & Allen, E. M. (1953). The growth of medical research 1941–1953 and the role of Public Health Service research grants. Science, 118(3065), 337–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enger, S. G., & Castellacci, F. (2016). Who gets Horizon 2020 research grants? Propensity to apply and probability to succeed in a two-step analysis. Scientometrics, 109(3), 1611–1638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernat, J. J., Yheulon, C. G., Lopez, A. J., & Warth, L. C. (2020). Does the h-index and self-citation affect external funding of orthopedic surgery research? An analysis of fellowship directors and their subspecialties. Journal of Orthopaedics, 20, 92–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallo, S. A., Thompson, L. A., Schmaling, K. B., & Glisson, S. R. (2019). The participation and motivations of grant peer reviewers: A comprehensive survey. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Gillum, L., Gouveia, C., Dorsey, E., Pletcher, M., Mathers, C., McCulloch, C., & Johnston, S. (2011). NIH disease funding levels and burden of disease. PLoS One, 6(2), e16837.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S., & Schaffer, W. T. (2016). Gender, race/ethnicity, and National Institutes of Health R01 research awards: Is there evidence of a double bind for women of color? Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 91(8), 1098–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, L. W., & Mercer, S. L. (2001). Can public health researchers and agencies reconcile the push from funding bodies and the pull from communities? American Journal of Public Health, 91(12), 1926–1929.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, C. P., Anderson, G. F., & Powe, N. R. (1999). The relation between funding by the National Institutes of Health and the burden of disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 340(24), 1881–1887.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gulbrandsen, M. & Smeby, J. C. (2005) Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Research Policy, 34(6), 932–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurwitz, D., Milanesi, E., & Koenig, T. (2014). Grant application review: The case of transparency. PLoS Biology, 12(12), e1002010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haller, M. K., & Welch, E. W. (2014). Entrepreneurial behavior of academic scientists: Network and cognitive determinants of commitment to grant submissions and award outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(4), 807–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hechtman, L. A., Moore, N. P., Schulkey, C. E., Miklos, A. C., Calcagno, A. M., Aragon, R., & Greenberg, J. H. (2018). NIH funding longevity by gender. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(31), 7943–7948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendee, W. R., Chien, S., Maynard, C. D., & Dean, D. J. (2002). The national institute of biomedical imaging and bioengineering: History, status, and potential impact. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 30(1), 2–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollenbach, A. D. (2018). A Practical Guide to Writing a Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Grant. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hong, J., Feng, B., Wu, Y., & Wang, L. (2016). Do government grants promote innovation efficiency in China’s high-tech industries? Technovation, 57–58, 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Y., Edwards, B., Brooks, K., Newhook, T., & Slingluff, C. (2015). Recent trends in National Institutes of Health funding for surgery: 2003 to 2013. The American Journal of Surgery, 209(6), 1083–1089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, M. H., & Huang, M. J. (2018). An analysis of global research funding from subject field and funding agencies perspectives in the G9 countries. Scientometrics, 115(2), 833–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, K. M., Giladi, A. M., & Chung, K. C. (2015). Factors impacting successfully competing for research funding: An analysis of applications submitted to the Plastic Surgery Foundation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 135(2), 429e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagsi, R., Motomura, A. R., Griffith, K. A., Rangarajan, S., & Ubel, P. A. (2009). Sex differences in attainment of independent funding by career development awardees. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(11), 804–811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jayasinghe, U. W., Marsh, H. W., & Bond, N. (2003). A multilevel cross‐classified modelling approach to peer review of grant proposals: The effects of assessor and researcher attributes on assessor ratings. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 166(3), 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, R., Thursby, J., & Thursby, M. C. (2010). University-industry spillovers, government funding, and industrial consulting. National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w15732/w15732.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanji, S. (2015). Turning your research idea into a proposal worth funding. The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 68(6), 458–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keenihan, S. H. (2001). Gender bias in grant application rates. Trends in Parasitology, 17(4), 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, D. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature (London), 430(6997), 311–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleer, R. (2010). Government R&D subsidies as a signal for private investors. Research Policy, 39(10), 1361–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koppelman, G. H., & Holloway, J. W. (2012). Successful grant writing. Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, 13(1), 63–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laudel, G. (2006). The art of getting funded: How scientists adapt to their funding conditions. Science and Public Policy, 33(7), 489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepori, B., Veglio, V., Heller-Schuh, B., Scherngell, T., & Barber, M. (2015). Participations to European Framework Programs of higher education institutions and their association with organizational characteristics. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2149–2178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leroy, J., Habicht, J., Pelto, G., & Bertozzi, S. (2007). Current priorities in health research funding and lack of impact on the number of child deaths per year. American Journal of Public Health, 97(2), 219–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ley, T. J., & Hamilton, B. H. (2008). The gender gap in NIH grant applications. Science, 322(5907), 1472–1474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindsay, D. R., & Allen, E. M. (1961). Medical research: Past support, future directions. Science, 134(3495), 2017–2024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madden, S., & Wiles, R. (2003). Developing a successful application for research funding. Physiotherapy, 89(9), 518–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Daniel, H. D., & O’Mara, A. (2009). Gender effects in the peer reviews of grant proposals: A comprehensive meta-analysis comparing traditional and multilevel approaches. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1290–1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Jayasinghe, U. W., & Bond, N. W. (2008). Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability. American Psychologist, 63(3), 160–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, M. R., Kopstein, A., & Janice, J. M. (2010). An analysis of preliminary and post-discussion priority scores for grant applications peer reviewed by the Center for Scientific Review at the NIH. PLoS One, 5(11), e13526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, R., Graham, I., Tetroe, J., & Volmink, J. (2018). Translating research into action: An international study of the role of research funders. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16(1), 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mongeon, P., Brodeur, C., Beaudry, C., & Larivière, V. (2016). Concentration of research funding leads to decreasing marginal returns. Research Evaluation, 25(4), 396–404.Google Scholar
Moore, A. L., Reiser, R. A., Bradley, T. W., & Zhao, W. (2016). Faculty professional development focused on identifying funding opportunities: An interactive tool. The Journal of Faculty Development, 30(3), 5–14.Google Scholar
Moses, H., Matheson, D., Cairns-Smith, S., George, B., Palisch, C., & Dorsey, E. (2015). The anatomy of medical research: US and international comparisons. JAMA, 313(2), 174–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Musambira, G., Collins, S., Brown, T., & Voss, K. (2012). From “publish or perish” to “grant or perish” examining grantsmanship in communication and the pressures on communication faculty to procure external funding for research. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 67(3), 234–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, R., Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2012). Does gender matter in grant peer review? An empirical investigation using the example of the Austrian science fund. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 220(2), 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2015). Governors, grants, and elections: Fiscal federalism in the American states. JHU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlich, D., & Shrope, N. (2012). Developing a winning grant proposal. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pachter, W., Fox, R., Zimbardo, P., & Antonuccio, D. (2007). Corporate funding and conflicts of interest: A primer for psychologists. The American Psychologist, 62(9), 1005–1015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinto, K. M., & Huizinga, D. (2018). Institutional barriers and faculty persistence: Understanding faculty grant-seeking at a predominantly undergraduate institution. The Journal of Faculty Development, 32(1), 65–72.Google Scholar
Porter, R. (2017). Reprint 2007: Why academics have a hard time writing good grants proposals. Journal of Research Administration, 48(1), 15–25.Google Scholar
Rani, K., & Luthra, R. (2011). Are research grants free from gender bias: An overview of funding pattern of CSIR extramural research projects in life sciences. Current Science, 38–42.Google Scholar
Reckhow, S., & Snyder, J. W. (2014). The expanding role of philanthropy in education politics. Educational Researcher, 43(4), 186–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichhardt, T. (1994). EPA reveals plans to double external grants. Nature, 372(6507), 583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, A. J., & Martin, B. R. (2000). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: Acritical review. Research Policy, 30(3), 509–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sattler, D. N., McKnight, P. E., Naney, L., & Mathis, R. (2015). Grant peer review: Improving inter-rater reliability with training. PLoS One, 10(6), e0130450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott Van Epps, J., & Younger, J. G. (2011). Early career academic productivity among emergency physicians with R01 grant funding. Academic Emergency Medicine, 18(7), 759–762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shavers, V. L., Fagan, P., Lawrence, D., McCaskill-Stevens, W., McDonald, P., Browne, D., … & Trimble, E. (2005). Barriers to racial/ethnic minority application and competition for NIH research funding. Journal of the National Medical Association, 97(8), 1063–1077.Google ScholarPubMed
Shepherd, J., Frampton, G. K., Pickett, K., & Wyatt, J. C. (2018). Peer review of health research funding proposals: A systematic map and systematic review of innovations for effectiveness and efficiency. PLoS One, 13(5), e0196914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shuman, K. M. (2019). Grant proposal preparation readiness: A glimpse at the education level of higher education faculty. Journal of Research Administration, 50(1), 89–107.Google Scholar
Smits, P., & Denis, J. (2014). How research funding agencies support science integration into policy and practice: An international overview. Implementation Science: IS, 9(1), 28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinmetz, J. (2007). The importance of external grant support for a public college of arts and science. Merrill Series on The Research Mission of Public Universities, 28–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenglin, M., & Cléirigh, C. (2020). Scientific grant application writing: Re/packaging text to enhance its impact. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 44, 100823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetroe, J. M., Graham, I. D., Foy, R., Robinson, N., Eccles, M. P., Wensing, M., … & Ward, J. E. (2008). Health research funding agencies’ support and promotion of knowledge translation: An international study. The Milbank Quarterly, 86(1), 125–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tricco, A. C., Thomas, S. M., Antony, J., Rios, P., Robson, R., Pattani, R., … & Straus, S. E. (2017). Strategies to prevent or reduce gender bias in peer review of research grants: A rapid scoping review. PLoS One, 12(1), e0169718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, S., Bull, A., Chinnery, F., Hinks, J., Mcardle, N., Moran, R., … & Wyatt, J. C. (2018). Evaluation of stakeholder views on peer review of NIHR applications for funding: A qualitative study. BMJ Open, 8(12), e022548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Besselaar, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Past performance, peer review and project selection: A case study in the social and behavioral sciences. Research Evaluation, 18(4), 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Slyke, C. J. (1946). New horizons in medical research. Science, 104(2711), 559–567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viergever, R., & Hendriks, T. (2016). The 10 largest public and philanthropic funders of health research in the world: What they fund and how they distribute their funds. Health Research Policy and Systems, 14(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waisbren, S. E., Bowles, H., Hasan, T., Zou, K. H., Emans, S. J., Goldberg, C., … & Longtine, J. (2008). Gender differences in research grant applications and funding outcomes for medical school faculty. Journal of Women’s Health, 17(2), 207–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, M. K. (1975). The top twenty and the rest: Big chemistry and little funding. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, 26(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witteman, H. O., Hendricks, M., Straus, S., & Tannenbaum, C. (2019). Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency. The Lancet, 393(10171), 531–540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bibliography
Adair, J. G. (1986). Research resources in Canadian university psychology departments. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 27(4), 342–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, M. M., Bhattacharyya, P., & Olejniczak, A. J. (2010). The effects of scholarly productivity and institutional characteristics on the distribution of federal research grants. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(2), 164–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Shukaili, A., & Al-Maniri, A. (2017). Writing a research proposal to the Research Council of Oman. Oman Medical Journal, 32(3), 180–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, S. N. E., Jagsi, R., Abbuhl, S. B., Lee, C. J., & Myers, E. R. (2019). Promoting gender equity in grant making: What can a funder do? The Lancet, 393(10171), e9–e11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amiri, A. R., Kanesalingam, K., Cro, S., & Casey, A. T. (2014). Does source of funding and conflict of interest influence the outcome and quality of spinal research? The Spine Journal, 14(2), 308–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ardehali, H. (2014). How to write a successful grant application and research paper. Circulation Research, 114(8), 1231–1234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, R., Hall, B. J., Doyle, J., & Waters, E. (2011). ‘Scoping the scope’ of a Cochrane review. Journal of Public Health, 33(1), 147–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (2005). The impact of NSF support for basic research in economics. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthurs, O. J. (2014). Think it through first: Questions to consider in writing a successful grant application. Pediatric Radiology, 44(12), 1507–1511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banta, M., Brewer, R., Hansen, A., & Heng-Yu, K. (2004). An innovative program for cultivating grant writing skills in new faculty members. Journal of Research Administration, 35(1), 17–24.Google Scholar
Beaudry, C., & Allaoui, S. (2012). Impact of public and private research funding on scientific production: The case of nanotechnology. Research Policy, 41(9), 1589–1606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedi, G., Van Dam, N. T., & Munafo, M. (2012). Gender inequality in awarded research grants. The Lancet, 380(9840), 474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, K. M., Gill, T. M., Brown, A. F., Zerzan, J., Elmore, J. G., & Wilson, I. B. (2007). Demystifying the NIH grant application process. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(11), 1587–1595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, A. M., & Moore, T. A. (2011). Effective grant writing. Journal of Infusion Nursing, 34(3), 167–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birkhahn, R. H., Van Deusen, S. K., Okpara, O. I., Datillo, P. A., Briggs, W. M., & Gaeta, T. J. (2006). Funding and publishing trends of original research by emergency medicine investigators over the past decade. Academic Emergency Medicine, 13(1), 95–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanco, M. A., & Lee, M. Y. (2012). Twelve tips for writing educational research grant proposals. Medical Teacher, 34(6), 450–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanco, M. A., Gruppen, L. D., ArtinoJr, A. R., Uijtdehaage, S., Szauter, K., & Durning, S. J. (2016). How to write an educational research grant: AMEE Guide No. 101. Medical Teacher, 38(2), 113–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloch, C., Graversen, E. K., & Pedersen, H. S. (2014). Competitive research grants and their impact on career performance. Minerva, 52(1), 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boardman, P. C., & Ponomariov, B. L. (2007). Reward systems and NSF university research centers: The impact of tenure on university scientists’ valuation of applied and commercially relevant research. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(1), 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogler, R. (1994). The impact of past experience on people’s preference: The case of university researchers’ dependency on funding sources. Higher Education, 28(2), 169–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L., & Van den Besselaar, P. (2010). A meta-evaluation of scientific research proposals: Different ways of comparing rejected to awarded applications. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Daniel, H. D. (2007). Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 226–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornmann, L., Wallon, G., & Ledin, A. (2008). Does the committee peer review select the best applicants for funding? An investigation of the selection process for two European molecular biology organization programmes. PLoS One, 3(10), e3480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2007). Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers’ interactions with industry. Research Policy, 36(5), 694–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, D. (1998). The role of funding agencies in the cognitive development of science. Research Policy, 27(8), 807–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, M. V., & Bouvet, M. (2010). Writing a successful NIH mentored career development grant (K award): Hints for the junior faculty surgeon. Annals of Surgery, 251(6), 1013–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, D. (2004). How to write grants: The best kept secret in the school business. The Journal, 31(10), 30–34.Google Scholar
Brownson, R. C., Colditz, G. A., Dobbins, M., Emmons, K. M., Kerner, J. F., Padek, M., … & Stange, K. C. (2015). Concocting that magic elixir: Successful grant application writing in dissemination and implementation research. Clinical and Translational Science, 8(6), 710–716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burrow-Sánchez, J. J., Martin, J. L., & Imel, Z. E. (2016). Applying for grant funding as a counseling psychologist: From thought to action. The Counseling Psychologist, 44(4), 479–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, E. G., Louis, K. S., & Blumenthal, D. (1998). Looking a gift horse in the mouth: Corporate gifts supporting life sciences research. JAMA, 279(13), 995–999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canon, B. C., Gabel, M., & Patton, D. J. (2002). External grants and publication: Sources, outlets, and implications. PS: Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 743–750.Google Scholar
Chen, S. H., Huang, M. H., & Chen, D. Z. (2013). Driving factors of external funding and funding effects on academic innovation performance in university-industry–government linkages. Scientometrics, 94(3), 1077–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chudnovsky, D., López, A., Rossi, M. A., & Ubfal, D. (2008). Money for science? The impact of research grants on academic output. Fiscal Studies, 29(1), 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, K. C., & Shauver, M. J. (2008). Fundamental principles of writing a successful grant proposal. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 33(4), 566–572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, R. C., & Carter, K. F. (2019). Successful grant applications: Follow the 4 F’s. Nursing, 49(2), 55–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, P., Herbert, D., Graves, N., & Barnett, A. G. (2016). A randomized trial of fellowships for early career researchers finds a high reliability in funding decisions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 69, 147–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crockett, S. D., Dellon, E. S., Bright, S. D., & Shaheen, N. J. (2009). A 25-year analysis of the American college of gastroenterology research grant program: Factors associated with publication and advancement in academics. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 104(5), 1097–1105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuhel-Schuckers, A., Martin-Tetreault, C., & Withers, C. (2016). The grants office and the RA generalist: Parallel life-cycles and development at small PUIs. Journal of Research Administration, 47(2), 80–93.Google Scholar
Davis, J. M., Soltis, P. S., Adams, D. C., Larkin, S. L., & Gilbert, R. A. (2020). Seed funds leverage external awards for research in natural resources and agricultural systems. Forests, 11(1), 76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jongh, T. E., Harnmeijer, J. H., Atun, R., Korenromp, E. L., Zhao, J., Puvimanasinghe, J., & Baltussen, R. (2014). Health impact of external funding for HIV, tuberculosis and malaria: Systematic review. Health Policy and Planning, 29(5), 650–662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deatherage, J. F. (2019). Strategic planning for research grant applications. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 30(23), 2867–2869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Defazio, D., Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2009). Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program. Research Policy, 38(2), 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, H. (2008). The use of cognitive and social apprenticeship to teach a disciplinary genre: Initiation of graduate students into NIH grant writing. Written communication, 25(1), 3–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinov, I. D. (2019). Flipping the grant application review process. Studies in Higher Education, 1–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Duchesne, A., Tannenbaum, C., & Einstein, G. (2017). Funding agency mechanisms to increase sex and gender analysis. The Lancet, 389(10070), 699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Easterly, D., & Pemberton, C. L. (2008). Understanding barriers and supports to proposal writing as perceived by female associate professors: Achieving promotion to professor. Research Management Review, 16(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
Ecobici, N. (2011). Accounting of the external grants and its influence on the Romanian public institutions’ surplus or deficit. Annals-Economy Series, 4, 66–69.Google Scholar
Eloy, J. A., Svider, P. F., Kovalerchik, O., Baredes, S., Kalyoussef, E., & Chandrasekhar, S. S. (2013). Gender differences in successful NIH grant funding in otolaryngology. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 149(1), 77–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falk-Krzesinski, H. J., & Tobin, S. C. (2015). How do I review thee? Let me count the ways: A comparison of research grant proposal review criteria across US federal funding agencies. The Journal of Research Administration, 46(2), 79–94.Google ScholarPubMed
Fogelholm, M., Leppinen, S., Auvinen, A., Raitanen, J., Nuutinen, A., & Väänänen, K. (2012). Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65(1), 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortin, J. M., & Currie, D. J. (2013). Big science vs. little science: How scientific impact scales with funding. PLoS One, 8(6), e65263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fortunato, S., Bergstrom, C. T., Börner, K., Evans, J. A., Helbing, D., Milojević, S., … & Vespignani, A. (2018). Science of science. Science, 359(6379), eaao0185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freel, S. A., Smith, P. C., Burns, E. N., Downer, J. B., Brown, A. J., & Dewhirst, M. W. (2017). Multidisciplinary mentoring programs to enhance junior faculty research grant success. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 92(10), 1410–1415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallo, S. A., Carpenter, A. S., & Glisson, S. R. (2013). Teleconference versus face-to-face scientific peer review of grant application: Effects on review outcomes. PLoS One, 8(8), e71693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallo, S. A., Carpenter, A. S., Irwin, D., McPartland, C. D., Travis, J., Reynders, S., … & Glisson, S. R. (2014). The validation of peer review through research impact measures and the implications for funding strategies. PLoS One, 9(9), e106474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrison, H. H., & Deschamps, A. M. (2014). NIH research funding and early career physician scientists: Continuing challenges in the 21st century. The FASEB Journal, 28(3), 1049–1058.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaughan, M., & Bozeman, B. (2002). Using curriculum vitae to compare some impacts of NSF research grants with research center funding. Research Evaluation, 11(1), 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerhardus, A., Becher, H., Groenewegen, P., Mansmann, U., Meyer, T., Pfaff, H., … & Hummers-Pradier, E. (2016). Applying for, reviewing and funding public health research in Germany and beyond. Health Research Policy and Systems, 14(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gholipour, A., Lee, E. Y., & Warfield, S. K. (2014). The anatomy and art of writing a successful grant application: A practical step-by-step approach. Pediatric Radiology, 44(12), 1512–1517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillies, D. (2014). Selecting applications for funding: why random choice is better than peer review. RT.A Journal on Research Policy and Evaluation, 2(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Ginther, D. K., Schaffer, W. T., Schnell, J., Masimore, B., Liu, F., Haak, L. L., & Kington, R. (2011). Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards. Science, 333(6045), 1015–1019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldfarb, B. (2008). The effect of government contracting on academic research: Does the source of funding affect scientific output? Research Policy, 37(1), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopkinar-Shelton, E., & Asomani-Adem, A. A. (2020). Developing grant writing skills in the humanities and social sciences: A case for increasing program-level supports. Journal of the Student Personnel Association at Indiana University, 139–142.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. B., Osganian, S. K., Emans, S. J., & Lovejoy, F. H. (2009). Gender differences in research grant applications for pediatric residents. Pediatrics, 124(2), e355–e361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, S. L. (1989). Ingredients of a successful grant application to the National Institutes of Health. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 7(1), 138–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottlieb, M., Lee, S., Burkhardt, J., Carlson, J. N., King, A. M., Wong, A. H., & Santen, S. A. (2019). Show me the money: successfully obtaining grant funding in medical education. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 20(1), 71–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grants.gov Program Management Office. (n.d.). A short summary of federal grants. Retrieved from www.grants.gov/web/grants/learn-grants/grants-101.htmlGoogle Scholar
Graves, N., Barnett, A. G., Clarke, P. (2011). Funding grant proposals for scientific research: Retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel. BMJ, 343, d4797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, L. W., & Mercer, S. L. (2001). Can public health researchers and agencies reconcile the push from funding bodies and the pull from communities? American Journal of Public Health, 91(12), 1926–1929.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greipp, M. (1987). Grant application strategies for computers in nursing education. Computers in Nursing, 5(1), 20–23.Google ScholarPubMed
Grimpe, C. (2012). Extramural research grants and scientists’ funding strategies: Beggars cannot be choosers? Research Policy, 41(8), 1448–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groves, P. S., Rawl, S. M., Wurzbach, M. E., Fahrenwald, N., Cohen, M. Z., McCarthy Beckett, D. O., … & Conn, V. (2012). Secrets of successful short grant applications. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 34(1), 6–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guillen-Grima, F., Annan, J. W., Álvarez, J. M. N., Gómez, J. M. S., & Ontoso, E. A. (2009). How to apply for research grants in allergology. Allergologia et Immunopathologia, 37(3), 146–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). An introduction to functional grammar. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanney, S. R., Grant, J., Wooding, S., & Buxton, M. J. (2004). Proposed methods for reviewing the outcomes of health research: The impact of funding by the UK’s Arthritis Research Campaign’. Health Research Policy and Systems, 2(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harper, L., Castagnetti, M., Herbst, K., Bagli, D., Kaefer, M., Beckers, G., … Kalfa, N. (2018). How to apply for a research grant: 10 tips and tricks. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 14(5), 453–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, K. (1984). Factors associated with external funding in higher education: A review of research. Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 15(3), 39–47.Google Scholar
Head, M. G., et al. (2017). Global funding trends for malaria research in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic analysis. The Lancet Global Health 5(8), e772–e781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herbert, D. L., Graves, N., Clarke, P., & Barnett, A. G. (2015). Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: A prospective study. BMJ Open, 5, e008380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heutel, G. (2014). Crowding out and crowding in of private donations and government grants. Public Finance Review, 42(2), 143–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himanen, L., Auranen, O., Puuska, H. M., & Nieminen, M. (2009). Influence of research funding and science policy on university research performance: A comparison of five countries. Science and Public Policy, 36(6), 419–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569–16572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hojjat, H., Johnson, A. P., Svider, P. F., Hong, R. S., Zuliani, G., Folbe, A. J., & Shkoukani, M. A. (2015). Scholarly investigation into otitis media: Who is receiving funding support from the National Institutes of Health? The Laryngoscope, 125(7), 1708–1714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, B., Scarrow, G., & Schellenberg, M. (2012). Translating evidence into practice: The role of health research funders. Implementation Science, 7(1), 39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horner, R. D. (2007). Demystifying the NIH grant application process: The rest of the story. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22, 1628–1629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hottenrott, H., & Lawson, C. (2014). Research grants, sources of ideas and the effects on academic research. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 23(2), 109–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howie, J. (1978). How to do it. Apply for a research grant. British Medical Journal, 2(6151), 1553–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, A. G. (2020). Public funding and the ascent of Chinese science: Evidence from the National Natural Science Foundation of China. Research Policy, 49(5), 103983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffman, W. E., & Evenson, R. E. (2006). Do formula or competitive grant funds have greater impacts on state agricultural productivity? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(4), 783–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hug, S. E., & Aeschbach, M. (2020). Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inouye, S. K., & Fiellin, D. A. (2005). An evidence-based guide to writing grant proposals for clinical research. Annals of Internal Medicine, 142(4), 274–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Islam, M., Fremeth, A., & Marcus, A. (2018). Signaling by early stage startups: US government research grants and venture capital funding. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(1), 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, B. A., & Lefgren, L. (2011). The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9–10), 1168–1177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jayasinghe, U. W., Marsh, H. W., & Bond, N. (2001). Peer review in the funding of research in higher education: The Australian experience. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4), 343–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonisch, A. I., Kligerman, S., Nagy, E., Bhargavan, M., Forman, H. P., & Sunshine, J. (2006). What characterizes academic radiology departments that secure large amounts of external funding for research? Academic Radiology. 13(12), 1513–1516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joshi, A. M., Inouye, T. M., & Robinson, J. A. (2018). How does agency workforce diversity influence Federal R&D funding of minority and women technology entrepreneurs? An analysis of the SBIR and STTR programs, 2001–2011. Small Business Economics, 50(3), 499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, K. (2012). Funding: Got to get a grant. Nature, 482(7385), 429–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, R. M., Johnson, S. B., & Kobor, P. C. (2017). NIH behavioral and social sciences research support: 1980–2016. American Psychologist, 72(8), 808–821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keskinen, S., & Silius, H. (2006). New trends in research funding – Threat or opportunity for interdisciplinary gender research? Nordic Journal of Women’s Studies, 14(2), 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kintisch, E. (2005). Researcher faces prison for fraud in NIH grant applications and papers. Science, 307(5717), 1851–1852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, J. T. (2008). Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: A literature review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2), S116–S123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleinfelder, J., Price, J. H., & Dake, J. A. (2003). Grant writing: Practice and preparation of university health educators. American Journal of Health Education, 34(1), 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, B., Diehl, K., Tscherning, K., & Helming, K. (2013). A framework for structuring interdisciplinary research management. Research Policy, 42(1), 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotchen, T. A., Lindquist, T., Malik, K., & Ehrenfeld, E. (2004). NIH peer review of grant applications for clinical research. JAMA, 291(7), 836–843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulage, K. M., Schnall, R., Hickey, K. T., Travers, J., Zezulinski, K., Torres, F., … & Larson, E. L. (2015). Time and costs of preparing and submitting an NIH grant application at a school of nursing. Nursing Outlook, 63(6), 639–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kundel, H. L., & Walsh, C. (1993). Preparing a research grant application budget. Investigative Radiology, 28, S13–S16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwekkeboom, K. L. (2014). Overview and tips for successful grant writing for infusion nurses. Journal of Infusion Nursing, 37(5), 371–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larivière, V., et al. (2010). Which Scientific Elites? On the Concentration of Research Funds, Publications and Citations. Research Evaluation 19(1), 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laudel, G. (2005). Is external research funding a valid indicator for research performance? Research Evaluation, 14(1), 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laudel, G. (2006). The ‘quality myth’: Promoting and hindering conditions for acquiring research funds. Higher Education, 52(3), 375–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leak, R. K., O’Donnell, L. A., & Surratt, C. K. (2015). Teaching pharmacology graduate students how to write an NIH grant application. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(9), 138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leberman, S. I., Eames, B., & Barnett, S. (2016). Unless you are collaborating with a big name successful professor, you are unlikely to receive funding. Gender and Education, 28(5), 644–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, T. H., Ognibene, F. P., & Schwartz, J. S. (1991). Correlates of external research support among respondents to the 1990 American Federation for Clinical Research survey. Clinical Research, 39(2), 135–144.Google Scholar
Lepori, B., Van den Besselaar, P., Dinges, M., Van der Meulen, B., Potì, B., Reale, E., … & Theves, J. (2007). Indicators for comparative analysis of public project funding: concepts, implementation and evaluation. Research Evaluation, 16(4), 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ley, T. J., & Hamilton, B. H. (2008). The gender gap in NIH grant applications. Science, 322(5907), 1472–1474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, D., & Agha, L. (2015). Big names or big ideas: Do peer-review panels select the best science proposals? Science, 348(6233), 434–438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liefner, I. (2003). Funding, resource allocation, and performance in higher education systems. Higher education, 46(4), 469–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgreen, A., Di Benedetto, C. A., Verdich, C., Vanhamme, J., Venkatraman, V., Pattinson, S., … & Khan, Z. (2019). How to write really good research funding applications. Industrial Marketing Management, 77, 232–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisanti, P., & Talotta, D. (2000). Tips for writing a NAON research grant proposal. Orthopaedic Nursing, 19(2), 61–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lisk, D. J. (1971). Why research grant applications are turned down. BioScience, 21(20), 1025–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, K., & Thomas‐Anderson, T. (2017). How community colleges are closing the skills gap through CTE and STEM funding innovations. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2017(178), 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusk, S. L. (2004). Developing an outstanding grant application. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 26(3), 367–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luukkonen, T. (2014). The European research council and the European research funding landscape. Science and Public Policy, 41(1), 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackert, M., Donovan, E. E., & Bernhardt, J. M. (2017). Applied grant writing training for future health communication researchers: The health communication scholars program. Health Communication, 32(2), 247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGroarty, E., Jimenez, T. R., Linley, J., Li, Y., Granberry-Russell, P., & Williams, K. P. (2014). External funding: Impact on promotion and retention of STEM assistant professors. Journal of Academic and Business Ethics, 8, 1.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moed, H. F. (2006). Citation analysis in research evaluation (Vol. 9). Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Moeller, R. M., & Christensen, D. M. (2009). System mapping: A genre field analysis of the National Science Foundation’s grant proposal and funding process. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19(1), 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Movsesian, M. A. (1990). Effect on physician-scientists of the low funding rate of NIH grant applications. The New England Journal of Medicine, 322, 1602–1604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munro, S., Hendrix, C. C., Cowan, L. J., Battaglia, C., Wilder, V. D., Bormann, J. E., … & Sullivan, S. C. (2019). Research productivity following nursing research initiative grants. Nursing Outlook, 67(1), 6–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, D. L., Morris, D., Lavoie, C., Leavitt, P. R., MacIsaac, H., Masson, M. E., & Villard, M. A. (2016). Bias in research grant evaluation has dire consequences for small universities. PLoS One, 11(6), e0155876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murtinho, F., Eakin, H., López-Carr, D., & Hayes, T. M. (2013). Does external funding help adaptation? Evidence from community-based water management in the Colombian Andes. Environmental Management, 52(5), 1103–1114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muscio, A., Quaglione, D., & Vallanti, G. (2013). Does government funding complement or substitute private research funding to universities? Research Policy, 42(1), 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, R., Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2012). Heterogeneity of inter-rater reliabilities of grant peer reviews and its determinants: A general estimating equations approach. PLoS One, 7(10), e48509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Narahari, A. K., Mehaffey, J. H., Hawkins, R. B., Charles, E. J., Baderdinni, P. K., Chandrabhatla, A. S., … & Ailawadi, G. (2018). Surgeon scientists are disproportionately affected by declining NIH funding rates. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 226(4), 474–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, A. W., Lamb, A. D., & Gnanapragasam, V. J. (2016). Applying for research funding. Part 2 – Writing a grant application. Journal of Clinical Urology, 9(4), 230–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, J. M., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2012). Conform and be funded. Nature, 492(7427), 34–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novello, A. (1985). Evaluation of recent research grant applications to the National Institutes of Health in the area of pediatric nephrology. Pediatric Research, 19(11), 1139–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagel, P. S., & Hudetz, J. A. (2011). An analysis of scholarly productivity in United States academic anaesthesiologists by citation bibliometrics. Anaesthesia, 66(10), 873–878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patil, S. G. (2019). How to plan and write a budget for research grant proposal? Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine, 10(2), 139–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, A. A. (2003). The effects of congressional appropriation committee membership on the distribution of federal research funding to universities. Economic Inquiry, 41(2), 325–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, A. A., & Siow, A. (2003). Does federal research funding increase university research output? Advanced in Economic Analysis & Policy, 3(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellicano, E., Dinsmore, A., & Charman, T. (2014). What should autism research focus upon? Community views and priorities from the United Kingdom. Autism, 18(7), 756–770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penrod, J. (2003). Getting funded: Writing a successful qualitative small-project proposal. Qualitative Health Research, 13(6), 821–832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, M. D., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Implementation, 13(3), 141–146.Google ScholarPubMed
Pier, E. L., Brauer, M., Filut, A., Kaatz, A., Raclaw, J., Nathan, M. J., … & Carnes, M. (2018). Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(12), 2952–2957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pohlhaus, J. R., Jiang, H., Wagner, R. M., Schaffer, W. T., & Pinn, V. W. (2011). Sex differences in application, success, and funding rates for NIH extramural programs. Academic Medicine, 86(6), 759–767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porter, R. (2004). Off the launching pad: Stimulating proposal development by junior faculty. Journal of Research Administration, 35(1), 6–12.Google Scholar
Preuss, M. (2015). Assessing grant capacity and readiness: A systematic review of the periodical literature of research administration. Research Management Review, 20(2), 1–18.Google Scholar
Price, D. J. D. S. (1963). Little science, big science. Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rad, A. E., Brinjikji, W., Cloft, H. J., & Kallmes, D. F. (2010). The H-index in academic radiology. Academic Radiology, 17(7), 817–821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reiser, R. A., Moore, A. L., Bradley, T. W., Walker, R., & Zhao, W. (2015). Supporting faculty efforts to obtain research funding: Successful practices and lessons learned. The Journal of Faculty Development, 29(3), 43–50.Google Scholar
Rezaeian, M. (2015). How to construct a successful grant proposal. World Family Medicine Journal: Incorporating the Middle East Journal of Family Medicine, 99(1645), 1–2.Google Scholar
Rezek, I., McDonald, R. J., & Kallmes, D. F. (2011). Is the h-index predictive of greater NIH funding success among academic radiologists? Academic Radiology, 18(11), 1337–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roebber, P. J., & Schultz, D. M. (2011). Peer review, program officers and science funding. PLoS One, 6(4), e18680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenkrantz, A. B., & Jiang, A. (2016). Associations between NIH funding and advanced bibliometric indices among radiological investigators. Academic radiology, 23(6), 669–674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saraykar, S., Saleh, A., & Selek, S. (2017). The association between NIMH funding and h-index in psychiatry. Academic Psychiatry, 41(4), 455–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saygitov, R. T. (2014). The impact of funding through the RF president’s grants for young scientists (the field–medicine) on research productivity: A quasi-experimental study and a brief systematic review. PLoS One, 9(1), e86969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schembri-Wismayer, P., Cuschieri, S., & Grech, V. (2018). WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): Writing a research grant–1, applying for funding. Early Human Development, 127, 106–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schumacher, D. (1994). Strategies for helping your faculty get more grants from companies. Research Management Review, 7(1), 37–52.Google Scholar
Sehgal, A. R. (2018). Number of grant applications needed to fund research faculty: A probabilistic analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 33(8), 1232–1234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silvestre, J., Abbatematteo, J. M., Chang, B., Serletti, J. M., & Taylor, J. A. (2016). The impact of National Institutes of Health funding on scholarly productivity in academic plastic surgery. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 137(2), 690–695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Singh, J., Illes, J., Lazzeroni, L., & Hallmayer, J. (2009). Trends in US autism research funding. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(5), 788–795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, J. L., Stoop, C., Young, M., Belou, R., & Held, S. (2017). Grant-writing bootcamp: An intervention to enhance the research capacity of academic women in STEM. BioScience, 67(7), 638–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, M. A., Kaufman, N. J., & Dearlove, A. J. (2013). External community review committee: A new strategy for engaging community stakeholders in research funding decisions. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 7(3), 301–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sobkowicz, P. (2015). Innovation suppression and clique evolution in peer-review-based, competitive research funding systems: An agent-based model. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 18(2), 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solans-Domènech, M., Guillamón, I., Ribera, A., Ferreira-González, I., Carrion, C., Permanyer-Miralda, G., & Pons, J. (2017). Blinding applicants in a first-stage peer-review process of biomedical research grants: An observational study. Research Evaluation, 26(3), 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonis, J. H., Triffleman, E., King, L., & King, D. (2009). How to write an NIH R13 conference grant application. Academic Psychiatry, 33(3), 256–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stavropoulou, C., et al. (2019). Most UK scientists who publish extremely highly-cited papers do not secure funding from major public and charity funders: A descriptive analysis. PLoS One, 14(2). e0211460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R., & Gordeeva, T. (1996). The Anatomy of Impact: What Makes an Article Influential? Psychological Science, 7(2), 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, D. (2009). How your grant proposal compares. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 1–4.Google Scholar
Svider, P. F., D’Aguillo, C. M., White, P. E., Pashkova, A. A., Bhagat, N., Langer, P. D., & Eloy, J. A. (2014). Gender differences in successful National Institutes of Health funding in ophthalmology. Journal of Surgical Education, 71(5), 680–688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Svider, P. F., Husain, Q., Folbe, A. J., Couldwell, W. T., Liu, J. K., & Eloy, J. A. (2014). Assessing National Institutes of Health funding and scholarly impact in neurological surgery. Journal of Neurosurgery, 120(1), 191–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Svider, P. F., Lopez, S. A., Husain, Q., Bhagat, N., Eloy, J. A., & Langer, P. D. (2014). The association between scholarly impact and National Institutes of Health funding in ophthalmology. Ophthalmology, 121(1), 423–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Svider, P. F., Mauro, K. M., Sanghvi, S., Setzen, M., Baredes, S., & Eloy, J. A. (2013). Is NIH funding predictive of greater research productivity and impact among academic otolaryngologists? The Laryngoscope, 123(1), 118–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamblyn, R., Girard, N., Qian, C. J., & Hanley, J. (2018). Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada. CMAJ, 190(16), e489–e499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thyer, B. A. (2011). Harmful effects of federal research grants. Social Work Research, 35(1), 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tress, B., Tress, G., & Fry, G. (2005). Integrative studies on rural landscapes: Policy expectations and research practice. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70(1–2), 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K., Colquhoun, H., Kastner, M., … & Kenny, M. (2016). A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tung, V. W. S., & Law, R. (2017). Evaluating external research grant proposals in tourism and hospitality: Insights from senior researchers. Tourism Recreation Research, 42(4), 457–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turaga, K. K., Green, D. E., Jayakrishnan, T. T., Hwang, M., & Gamblin, T. C. (2013). Attributes of a surgical chairperson associated with extramural funding of a department of surgery. Journal of Surgical Research, 185(2), 549–554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Arensbergen, P., & Van Den Besselaar, P. (2012). The selection of scientific talent in the allocation of research grants. Higher Education Policy, 25(3), 381–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Bekkum, J. E., Fergie, G. M., & Hilton, S. (2016). Health and medical research funding agencies’ promotion of public engagement within research: A qualitative interview study exploring the United Kingdom context. Health Research Policy and Systems, 14(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Besselaar, P., & Sandström, U. (2015). Early career grants, performance, and careers: A study on predictive validity of grant decisions. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 826–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Lee, R., & Ellemers, N. (2015). Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(40), 12349–12353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Leeuwen, T. N., & Moed, H. F. (2012). Funding decisions, peer review, and scientific excellence in physical sciences, chemistry, and geosciences. Research Evaluation, 21(3), 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velarde, K. S. (2018). The way we ask for money… The emergence and institutionalization of grant writing practices in academia. Minerva, 56(1), 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernon, D., & Rainey, J. S. (2009). The school counselor as grant writer. Journal of School Counseling, 7(19), n19.Google Scholar
Villalba, J. A., & Young, J. S. (2012). Externally funded research in counselor education: An overview of the process. Counselor Education and Supervision, 51(2), 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viner, N., Powell, P., & Green, R. (2004). Institutionalized biases in the award of research grants: A preliminary analysis revisiting the principle of accumulative advantage. Research Policy, 33(3), 443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vintzileos, W. S., Ananth, C. V., & Vintzileos, A. M. (2013). External funding of obstetrical publications: Citation significance and trends over 2 decades. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 209(2), 150.e1–150.e6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walden, P. R., & Bryan, V. C. (2010). Tenured and non-tenured college of education faculty motivators and barriers in grant writing: A public university in the South. Journal of Research Administration, 41(3), 85–98.Google Scholar
Wang, J., & Shapira, P. (2011). Funding acknowledgement analysis: An enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: The case of nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 87(3), 563–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J. (2006). External funding and firm growth: Comparing female-and male-controlled SMEs. Venture Capital, 8(1), 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitley, R., Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2018). The impact of changing funding and authority relationships on scientific innovations. Minerva, 56(1), 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wichmann-Hansen, G., & Herrmann, K. J. (2017). Does external funding push doctoral supervisors to be more directive? A large-scale Danish study. Higher Education, 74(2), 357–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiebe, N. G., & Maticka-Tyndale, E. (2017). More and better grant proposals? The evaluation of a grant-writing group at a mid-sized Canadian university. Journal of Research Administration, 48(2), 67–92.Google Scholar
Winn, A. S., Nigrovic, L. E., Lovejoy, F. H., & Sandora, T. J. (2019). Impact of a resident research grant on scholarly output during pediatric residency. Academic Pediatrics, 19(4), 477–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wisdom, J. P., Riley, H., & Myers, N. (2015). Recommendations for writing successful grant proposals: An information synthesis. Academic Medicine, 90(12), 1720–1725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witteman, H. O., Hendricks, M., Straus, S., & Tannenbaum, C. (2019). Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency. The Lancet, 393(10171), 531–540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodward, D. K., & Clifton, G. D. (1994). Development of a successful research grant application. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 51(6), 813–822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, K. D., & 2005–2006 and 2006–2007 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Grants Committees. (2008). Productivity and career paths of previous recipients of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine research grant awards. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(6), 560–566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeng, A., Shen, Z., Zhou, J., Wu, J., Fan, Y., Wang, Y., & Stanley, H. E. (2017). The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems. Physics Reports, 714, 1–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, D. (2010). Characteristics and impact of grant-funded research: A case study of the library and information science field. Scientometrics, 84(2), 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, E. Y., Shemesh, S., & Moucha, C. S. (2017). The association between scholarly impact and national institutes of health funding in orthopaedic surgery. Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, 75(4), 257–263.Google ScholarPubMed
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The PDF of this book
conforms to version 2.0 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic
(A)
level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.