Intelligence Theory, Assessment, and Research: The Israeli Experience

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511616648.008

7 - Intelligence Theory, Assessment, and Research: The Israeli Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Gerald Matthews and

Edited by

Moshe Zeidner: Affiliation:
University of Haifa
Gerald Matthews: Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati
Richard D. Roberts: Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Robert J. Sternberg: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut

Book contents

Get access

Summary

OVERVIEW

Modern-day Israel, much like the United States, may aptly be described as a test-oriented and test-consumed society. During the first few decades of its existence, Israeli society almost miraculously managed to come to grips with a multitude of pressing social problems, including helping large numbers of immigrant children to assimilate into Israeli society. This process demanded a concerted effort at raising the standards of the educational system as a whole. Standardized aptitude and intelligence tests have a particularly formidable presence in the Israeli school system. These tests are primarily employed to serve the following functions: screening and diagnosis, student selection, classification, and placement (e.g., streaming). They have also been used to identify and select children for special programs, research and program evaluation, and vocational guidance and counseling (Zeidner, 1990b). In addition, scholastic aptitude tests are employed in the Israeli university system for purposes of student selection, classification, and placement (Beller, 1992, 1993; Zeidner, 1987b).

Generally, intelligence and ability assessments have important pedagogical, social, and economic implications for social systems. Because of the heterogeneous nature of the Israeli population, hosting more than 100 linguistic subcultures, Israeli researchers have understandably been concerned with group differences in ability and achievement, and in developing equitable methods of testing. Furthermore, given that Israel is severely deficient in natural resources, policy makers have realized that the development of its human intellectual resources is not only an economic vital investment, but is perhaps the only road to Israel's survival.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: International Handbook of Intelligence , pp. 212 - 247

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616648.008 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adler, C. (1984). Social integration in the context of the development of Israel's educational system. In Y. Amir & S. Sharan (Eds.), Social desegregation: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 21–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Alexander, H.(1999). A Jewish view of human learning. International Journal of Children's Spirituality, 4, 155–164CrossRef Google Scholar

Bar-On, R. (1997). The Emotional Intelligence Inventory (EQ-I): Technical manual. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems

Bashi, Y. (1976). Verbal and nonverbal abilities of students in grades four, six and eight in the Arab sector. Jerusalem: School of Education, Hebrew University

Bashi, J., Cahan, S., & Davis, D. (1981). An examination of academic achievement in Israeli Arabic-language elementary school. Jerusalem: Hebrew University and Ministry of Education

Beller, M. (1992). Admissions procedures in Israeli Universities: Psychometric and social considerations. Research report. Jerusalem: National Institute for Testing and Evaluation

Beller, M. (1993). Admission to higher education in Israel: Current dilemmas and proposed solutions. Research report #178A. Jerusalem: National Institute for Testing and Evaluation

Ben-Shakhar, G., & Beller, M.(1983). On the cultural fairness of psychological tests. Megamot Behavioral Sciences Quarterly, 28, 42–56Google Scholar

Ben-Shakhar, G., & Sheffer, L.(2001). The relationship between the ability to divide attention and standard measures of general cognitive abilities. Intelligence, 29, 293–306CrossRef Google Scholar

Ben-Simon, A., & Nevo, B. (1986). Differences in achievement on intercollegiate psychometric exam among different ethnic groups. Research report # 50. Jerusalem: National Institute for Testing and Evaluation

Blass, N., & Amir, B. (1984). Integration in education: The development of a policy. In Y. Amir & S. Sharan (Eds.), Social desegregation: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 63–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Cahan, S. (1998). Intelligence scale for children. Revised Manual. Hebrew Version of Wechsler's 1974 version. Jerusalem: Psychoeducational services and H. Szold institute

Cahan, S., & Ganor, Y. (1995). Cognitive gender differences among Israeli children. Sex Roles, 32, 469–484CrossRef Google Scholar

Canter, D. (Ed.). (1985). Facet theory: Approaches to social research. New York: Springer

Davis, D., Bashi, Y., & Cahan, S.(1977). Birth order and intellectual development: The confluence model in the light of cross-cultural evidence. Science, 196, 1470–1472CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Donlon, F. T. (Ed.). (1984). The College Board technical handbook for the Scholastic Aptitude Test and Achievement tests. New York: College Entrance Examinations Board

Elbedour, S., Bouchard, J. T., & Mi Hur, Y.(1997). Similarity in general mental ability in Bedouin full and half siblings. Intelligence, 25, 71–82CrossRef Google Scholar

Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R., & Gross, S. (1997). The learning potential assessment device. In D. P. Flanagain, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment (pp. 297–311). New York: Guilford Press

Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers. Baltimore: University Park Press

Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. B., & Miller, R. (1980). Instrumental enrichment. Baltimore: University Park Press

Gafni, N., & Beller, M. (1989). A test of the fairness in usage of psychometric exams for two gender groups. Research report # 95. Jerusalem: National Institute for Testing and Evaluation

Gafni, N., Beller, M., & Bronner, S. (2000). A cross-cultural perspective on gender differences in higher education: Admissions and scholastic achievement. Research report. Jerusalem: National Institute for Testing and Evaluation

Ganzach, Y., Saporta, I., & Weber, Y. (2000). Interaction in linear versus logistic models: A substantive Illustration using the relationship between Motivation, ability and performance. Organization research methods, 3, 237–253CrossRef Google Scholar

Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radex. In P. F. Lazarsfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences (pp. 258–348). New York: Free Press

Guttman, L. (1965a). The structure of interrelations among intelligence tests. In Proceedings of the 1964 invitational conference on testing problems. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service

Guttman, L. A. (1965b). A faceted definition of intelligence. In R. Eiferman (Ed.), Studies in psychology: Scripta Hierosolymita (Vol. 14, 166–81). Jerusalem: Hebrew University Press

Guttman, L. (1967). The development of nonmetric space analysis: A letter to Professor John Ross. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2, 71–82. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing ServiceCrossRef

Guttman, L. (1969). Integration of test design and analysis. In Proceedings of the 1969 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service

Guttman, R., & Guttman, L.(1974). Cross-cultural stability of an intercorrelation pattern of abilities. Human Biology, 35, 53–59Google Scholar

Guttman, L., & Levy, S.(1980). Two structural laws for intelligence. Megamot, 25, 421–438 (in Hebrew)Google Scholar

Guttman, L., & Levy, S.(1991). Two structural laws for intelligence. Intelligence, 15, 79–103CrossRef Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press

Kaplan, Z., Weiser, M., Reichenberg, A., Rabinowitz, J., Caspi, A., Bodner, E., & Zohar, J.(2002). Motivation to serve in the military influences vulnerability to future posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychiatry Research, 109, 45–49CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1996). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC). Israeli version of interpretive manual. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sports

Kennet-Cohen, T. (2001). Differential prediction and validity of college entrance exams by candidates' socio-economic status (in Hebrew). Jerusalem: National Institute for Testing and Evaluation

Kennet, T., & Oren, C. (1988). A test of the cultural fairness of the use of college entrance system in two universities. Research report # 78. Jerusalem: National Institute for Testing and Evaluation

Kennet-Cohen, T., Bronner, S., & Oren, C. (1995). A meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the selection process to universities in Israel. Jerusalem: National Institute for Testing and Evaluation

Kennett-Cohen, T., & Oren, C. (1993). Validity and fairness of psychometric exams and matriculation diploma in prediction of first year grades among elderly students (in Hebrew). Research report. Jerusalem: National Institute for Testing and Evaluation

Kfir, P.(1988). Achievements and aspirations among boys and girls in high school: A comparison of two Israeli ethnic groups. American Educational Research Journal, 5, 184–198Google Scholar

Koop, T. (1985). Replication of Guttman's structure of intelligence. In D. Canter (Ed.), Facet theory: Approaches to social research (pp. 59–96). New York: SpringerCrossRef

Kozulin, A., & Rand, Y. (2000). Experience of mediated learning: An impact of Feuerstein's theory in education and psychology. Oxford: Pergamon

Kugelmass, S., & Lieblich, A. (1975). A developmental study of the Arab child in Israel. Scientific Report. Ford Foundation Grant 015.1261

Kugelmass, S., Lieblich, A., & Bossik, D.(1974). Patterns of intellectual ability in Jewish and Arab children in Israel. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5, 184–198CrossRef Google Scholar

Levinson, S. (1986). Psychological tests in the schools. Ha'artez. Tel-Aviv: Schoken

Levy, S. (1985). Lawful roles of facets in social theories. In D. Canter (Ed.), Facet theory: Approaches to social research (pp. 59–96). New York: SpringerCrossRef

Lieblich, A. (1973). WPPSI-Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. Jerusalem: Psychological Corporation and Hebrew University

Lieblich, A., Ben-Shachar, S., &. Ninio, A (1976). WISC-R Hebrew Manual Psychological Corporation and Israeli Ministry of Education (in Hebrew)

Lieblich, A. (1983). Intelligence patterns among ethnic and minority groups in Israel. In M. Nisan & U. Last (Eds.), Between education and psychology (pp. 335–357). Jerusalem: Magnes Press (in Hebrew)

Lieblich, A. (1985). Sex differences in intelligence test performance of Jewish and Arab school children in Israel. In M. Safir, M. T. Mednick, D. Israeli, and J. Bernard (Eds.), Women's worlds: From the new scholarship. New York: Praeger

Lieblich, A., Ben-Shahar-Segev, N., & Ninio, A. (1980). WISC-R Manual for Arabic Examiner (in Arabic). Jerusalem: Psycho-Counselling Services

Lieblich, A., & Kugelmass, S.(1981). Patterns of intellectual ability of Arab school children in Israel. Intelligence, 5, 311–320CrossRef Google Scholar

Marshalek, B., Lohman, D. F., & Snow, E. R.(1983). The complexity continuum in the Radex and hierarchical model of intelligence. Intelligence, 7, 107–127CrossRef Google Scholar

Matthews, G., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. (2002). Emotional intelligence: Science and myth. Cambridge: MIT Press

Minkowitch, A., Davis, D., & Bashi, Y. (1982). Success and failure in Israeli elementary education. New Brunswick: NJ: Translation Books

Most, B., & Zeidner, M. (1995). Constructing personality and intelligence test instruments: Methods and issues. In D. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 475–503). New York: PlenumCrossRef

Nevo, B. (1993a). A multifaceted taxonomy of intelligence tests: A proposal. Assessment Update, 5, 14

Nevo, B.(1993b). In search of correctness typology for intelligence. New Ideas in Psychology, 11, 391–397CrossRef Google Scholar

Nevo, B.(1995). Examinee Feedback Questionnaire: Reliability and validity measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 499–504CrossRef Google Scholar

Nevo, B., & Chawarski, C. M.(1997). Individual differences in practical intelligence and success in immigration. Intelligence, 25, 83–92CrossRef Google Scholar

Nevo, B., & Oren, C.(1986). Concurrent validity of the American Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) and the Israeli Inter-University Psychometric Entrance Test (IUPET). Educational & Psychological Measurement, 46, 723–725CrossRef Google Scholar

Ortar, G. R. (1966). Milta Intelligence Test. Jerusalem: Hebrew University

Raven, J. C. (1960). Guide to using the Standard Progressive Matrices. London: Lewis

Raviv, A., Margalith, M., Raviv, A., & Sade, F.(1981). The cognitive patterns of Israeli learning disabled children as reflected in the Hebrew version of the WISC-R. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 411–415CrossRef Google Scholar

Raviv, A. (1989). School psychology in Israel. In P. A. Saigh & T. Oakland (Eds.), International perspectives on psychology in the schools (pp. 11–124). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Roberts, R. D., Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G.(2001). Does emotional intelligence meet traditional standards for an intelligence? Some new data and conclusions. Emotion, 1, 196–231CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Safir, M. P.(1986). The effects of nature or of nurture on sex differences in intellectual functioning. Sex Roles, 14, 581–590CrossRef Google Scholar

Saklofske, D., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.). (1995). International handbook of personality and intelligence. New York: Plenum

Samuda, R. J. (1975). Psychological testing of American minorities. New York: Harper & Row

Schlesinger, I. M., & Guttman, L.(1969). Smallest space analysis of intelligence and achievement tests. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 95–100CrossRef Google Scholar

Snow, R. E., Kyllonen, P. C., & Marshalek, B. (1984). The topography of ability and learning correlations. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 48–103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Tziner, A., & Rimmer, A.(1984). Examination of an extension of Guttman's model of ability tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 59–69CrossRef Google Scholar

Tzuriel, D. (2001). Dynamic assessment of young children. New York: Kluwer/Plenum

Zeidner, M.(1985). A cross-cultural test of the situational bias hypothesis – The Israeli scene. Evaluation and Program Planning, 8, 367–376CrossRef Google Scholar

Zeidner, M.(1986a). Sex differences in scholastic aptitude: The Israeli scene. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 847–852CrossRef Google Scholar

Zeidner, M.(1986b). Are Scholastic Aptitude Tests in Israel biased towards Arab student candidates? Some Israeli findings. Higher Education, 15, 507–522CrossRef Google Scholar

Zeidner, M.(1987a). The validity of college admission indices for Jews and Arabs in Israel. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 587–589CrossRef Google Scholar

Zeidner, M.(1987b). Test of the cultural bias hypothesis: Some Israeli findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 38–48CrossRef Google Scholar

Zeidner, M.(1987c). A cross-cultural test of sex bias in the predictive validity of scholastic aptitude examinations: Some Israeli findings. Evaluation and Program Planning, 10, 289–295CrossRef Google Scholar

Zeidner, M.(1988a). Age as a factor in scholastic aptitude test performance: The Israeli scene. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 9, 139–149CrossRef Google Scholar

Zeidner, M.(1988b). Cultural fairness in aptitude testing revisited: A cross-cultural parallel. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 257–262CrossRef Google Scholar

Zeidner, M.(1990a). Perceptions of ethnic group modal intelligence: Reflections of cultural stereotypes or intelligence test scores?Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 214–231CrossRef Google Scholar

Zeidner, M.(1990b). School-based assessment research in Israel: Current state and future directions. McGill Journal of Education, 25, 37–64Google Scholar

Zeidner, M.(1990c). Does test anxiety bias scholastic aptitude test performance by gender and sociocultural group?Journal of Personality and Personality Assessment, 55, 145–160CrossRef Google Scholar

Zeidner, M.(1991). Test anxiety and aptitude test performance in an actual college admission testing situation: Temporal considerations. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 101–109CrossRef Google Scholar

Zeidner, M. (1995). Personality trait correlates of intelligence. In D. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 299–319). New York: PlenumCrossRef

Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York: Plenum

Zeidner, M., & Feitelson, D.(1989). Probing the validity of intelligence tests for preschool children: A smallest space analysis. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 7, 175–193CrossRef Google Scholar

Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2000). Intelligence and personality. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.)., Handbook of intelligence (2nd ed., pp. 581–610.). NY: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G., & Roberts, R.(2001). Slow down, you move too fast: Emotional intelligence remains an “elusive” intelligence. Emotions, 1, 265–275CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Zeidner, M., & Nevo, B. (1992). Test anxiety in examinees in a college admission testing situation: Incidence, dimensionality, and cognitive correlates. In K. A. Hagtvet & T. B. Johnsen (Eds.), Advances in test anxiety research, (Vol. 7, pp. 288–303). Bristol, PA: Zeitlinger Publishers

Zeidner, M., Roberts, R., & Matthews, G. (2002). Can emotional intelligence be schooled? A critical review. Educational Psychologist, 37, 215–231CrossRef Google Scholar

Zohar, D.(1998). An additive model of test anxiety: Role of exam-specific expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 330–340CrossRef Google Scholar

Zohar, D., & Brandt, Y. (2002). Relationships between appraisal factors during stressful encounters: A test of alternative models. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping: An International Journal, 15, 149–161CrossRef Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.