Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-69cd664f8f-nfhdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-13T06:15:16.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2025

Georgia Kernell
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Inside Parties
How Party Rules Shape Membership and Responsiveness
, pp. 219 - 234
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, Christopher H. 1978. “Measuring Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 22(3):475510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James, Clark, Michael, Ezrow, Lawrence, and Glasgow, Garrett. 2006. “Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties’ Policy Shifts, 1976–1998.” American Journal of Political Science 50(3):513529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James and Samuel Merrill, III. 2008. “Candidate and Party Strategies in Two-Stage Elections Beginning with a Primary.” American Journal of Political Science 52(2):344359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James, Samuel Merrill, III, and Grofman, Bernard. 2005. “Does France’s Two-Ballot Presidential Election System Alter Candidates’ Policy Strategies?French Politics 3(2):98123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James and Somer-Topcu, Zeynep. 2009. “Policy Adjustment by Parties in Response to Rival Parties’ Policy Shifts: Spatial Theory and the Dynamics of Party Competition in twenty-five Post-War Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 39(4):825846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Troy L., Li, Yuanxia, and Liu, Hao. 2020. “A Replication of Beyond the Turk: Alternative Platforms for Crowdsourcing Behavioral Research – Sometimes Preferable to Student Groups.” AIS Transactions on Replication Research 6:122.Google Scholar
Adserá, Alicia, Boix, Carles, and Payne, Mark. 2003. “Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19(2):445490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1983. “A Downsian Spatial Model with Party Activism.” American Political Science Review 77(4):974990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 2011. Why Parties? A Second Look. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H. and McGinnis, Michael D.. 1989. “A Model of Party Constraints on Optimal Candidate Positions.” Mathematical and Computer Modeling 12(4/5):437450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto and Spear, Stephen E.. 1988. “An Overlapping Generations Model of Electoral Competition.” Journal of Public Economics 37(3):359379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J. and Just, Aida. 2013. “Legitimacy From Above: The Partisan Foundations of Support for the Political System in Democracies.” European Political Science Review 5(3):335362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, James M., Jr., and Charles Stewart, III. 2001. “Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 45(1):136159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen and Iyengar, Shanto. 1995. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Aranson, Peter H. and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1972. “Spatial Strategies for Sequential Elections” in Probability Models of Collective Decision Making, eds. Richard, G. Niemi and Herbert, F. Weisberg. Columbus, OH: Charles, E. Merrill Publishing Company, pp. 298331.Google Scholar
Bakker, Ryan, Liesbet Hooghe, Seth Jolly, Gary Marks, Jonathan Polk, Rovny, Jan, Steenbergen, Marco, and Anna Vachudova, Milada. Accessed 2020. 1999–2019 Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File. Version 1.2.3. chesdata.eu.Google Scholar
Bale, Tim, Webb, Paul, and Poletti, Monica. 2018. “Grassroots. Britain’s Party Members: Who They Are, What They Think, and What They Do.” London: Mile End Institute, Queen Mary University of London.Google Scholar
Baras, Montserrat, Argelaguet, Jordi, and Correa, Patricia. 2010. “Radiographie des Militants des Partis Politiques en Espagne.” Pôle Sud (2):6582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior 24(2):117150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawn, Kathleen, Martin Cohen, David Karol, Masket, Seth, Noel, Hans and Zaller, John. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10(3):571597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednar, Jenna. 2009. The Robust Federation: Principles of Design. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth. 2007. “Electoral Laws as Political Consequences: Explaining the Origins and Change of Electoral Institutions.” Annual Review of Political Science. 10:363390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth and Laver, Michael. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, Timothy and Burgess, Robin. 2002. “The Political Economy of Government Responsiveness: Theory and Evidence from India.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(4):14151451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bille, Lars. 2001. “Democratizing a Democratic Procedure: Myth or Reality?: Candidate Selection in Western European Parties, 1960–1990.” Party Politics 7(3):363380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bille, Lars, Hans Jørgen Nielsen, Roger Buch Jensen, Hansen, Bernhard, and Elklit, Jørgen. 2001. “The Danish Party Members, 2000.” https://digidata.rigsarkivet.dk/aflevering/37024Google Scholar
Black, Duncan. 1948. “On the Rationale of Group Decision-Making.” Journal of Political Economy 56(1):2334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Duncan. 1958. The Theory of Committees and Elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blair, Tony. 2019. Reported in The Guardian article by Rajeev Syal (December 18, 2019) “Ditch Corbyn’s ‘Misguided Ideology’, Tony Blair urges Labour.” www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/dec/18/tony-blair-urges-labour-to-ditch-jeremy-corbyn-misguided-ideologyGoogle Scholar
Blais, André. 2000. To Vote or Not to Vote?: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondel, Jean. 1978. Political Parties: A Genuine Case for Discontent? London, UK: Wildwood House.Google Scholar
Blyth, Mark and Katz, Richard. 2005. “From Catch-all Politics to Cartelisation: The Political Economy of the Cartel Party.” West European Politics 28(1):3360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bormann, Nils-Christian and Golder, Matt. 2013. “Democratic Electoral Systems Around the World, 1946–2011.” Electoral Studies 32(2):360369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brader, Ted and Tucker, Joshua A. 2012. “Following the Party’s Lead: Party Cues, Policy Opinion, and the Power of Partisanship in Three Multiparty Systems.” Comparative Politics 44(4):403403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brader, Ted, Lorenzo De Sio, Aldo Paparo, and Joshua A Tucker. 2020. “‘Where You Lead, I Will Follow’: Partisan Cueing on High-Salience Issues in a Turbulent Multiparty System.” Political Psychology 41(4):795812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David, Han, Hahrie, and Pope, Jeremy C.. February 2007. “Primary Elections and Candidate Ideology: Out of Step with the Primary Electorate?Legislative Studies Quarterly 32(1):79105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen. 2013. “Electing Extremists? Party Primaries and Legislative Candidates in Mexico.” Comparative Politics 45(4):398417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budge, Ian, Robertson, David, Hearl, Derek (eds.). 1987. Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-war Election Programmes in 19 Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burden, Barry C. 2004. “Candidate Positioning in US Congressional Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 34(2):211227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burst, Tobias, Werner Krause, Pola Lehmann, Jirka Lewandowski, Theres Matthieß, Merz, Nicolas, Regel, Sven, and Zehnter, Lisa. 2020. “The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2020a.” https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu/datasetsGoogle Scholar
Byman, Daniel L. and Pollack, Kenneth M.. 2001. “Let Us Now Praise Great Men: Bringing the Statesman Back In.” International Security 25(4):107146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caillaud, Bernard and Tirole, Jan. 2002. “Parties as Political Intermediaries.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(4):14531489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Gurin, Gerald, and Miller, Warren E.. 1954. The Voter Decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Company.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Phillip E., Miller, Warren E. and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Cancela, João and Geys, Benny. 2016. “Explaining Voter Turnout: A Meta-analysis of National and Subnational Elections.” Electoral Studies 42:264275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Brady, David W., and Cogan, John F.. 2002. “Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members’ Voting.” American Political Science Review 96(1):127140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John M and Polga-Hecimovich, John. 2006. “Primary Elections and Candidate Strength in Latin America.” The Journal of Politics 68(3):530543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Royce and Nalepa, Monika. 2020. “The Personal Vote and Party Cohesion: Modeling the Effects of Electoral Rules on Intraparty Politics.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 32(1):3669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carty, R. Kenneth. 2004. “Parties as Franchise Systems: The Stratarchical Organizational Imperative.” Party Politics 10(1):524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, Katherine, Kamara, Abou Bakarr, and Meriggi, Niccoló F. 2021. “An Experiment in Candidate Selection.” American Economic Review 111(5):15751612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Christine and Tavits, Margit. 2011. “Informal Influences in Selecting Female Political Candidates.” Political Research Quarterly 64(2):460471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Peter B. and Wilson, James Q.. 1961. “Incentive Systems: A Theory of Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 6(2):129166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Marty, Karol, David, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2008. The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Lindberg, Staffan I., Teorell, Jan et al. 2022. “V-Dem Dataset v12.” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemds22Google Scholar
Corbyn, Jeremy. 2015. “Leader of the Labour Party Acceptance Speech.” Victory Speech by Labour Party Leader Jeremy Corbyn [Accessed: 2022 08 31]. https://jeremycorbyn.org.uk/5912/Google Scholar
Corbyn, Jeremy. 2016. Reported in The Guardian article by Anushka Asthana, Rajeev Syal, and Jessica Elgot (June 28, 2016) “Labour MPs Prepare for Leadership Contest after Corbyn Loses confidence Vote.” www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/28/jeremy-corbyn-loses-labour-mps-confidence-voteGoogle Scholar
Courea, Eleni. 2021, July 24. “Huge Legal Bills Leave Labour Feeling the Pinch.” The Times Online Edition.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1987. The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 2010. “Swing Voters, Core Voters, and Distributive Politics” in Political Representation, eds. Ian Shapiro, Susan C. Stokes, Elisabeth Jean Wood, and Alexander S. Kirshner. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Vol. 23 of California Series on Social Choice and Political Economy Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crines, Andrew Scott, Jeffery, David, and Heppell, Timothy. 2018. “The British Labour Party and Leadership Election Mandate(s) of Jeremy Corbyn: Patterns of Opinion and Opposition within the Parliamentary Labour Party.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 28(3):361379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, William and Young, Lisa. 2002. “Policy Attitudes of Party Members in Canada: Evidence of Ideological Politics.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 35(4):859880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, William and Young, Lisa. 2008. “Factors Influencing the Decision of the Young Politically Engaged to Join a Political Party: An Investigation of the Canadian Case.” Party Politics 14(2):345369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, William P. and Blais, André. 2012. Politics at the Centre: The Selection and Removal of Party Leaders in the Anglo Parliamentary Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell L. and Wattenberg, Martin P.. 2000. “Unthinkable Democracy: Political Change in Advanced Industrialized Democracies” in Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, eds. Russell, J. Dalton and Martin, P. Wattenberg. London, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 318.Google Scholar
Dassonneville, Ruth. 2019. “Dataset Net Volatility in Western Europe.” https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AOVSGVGoogle Scholar
De Boef, Suzanna and Kellstedt, Paul M. 2004. “The Political (and Economic) Origins of Consumer Confidence.” American Journal of Political Science 48(4):633649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, De Marchi and Laver, Michael. 2023. The Governance Cycle in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
den Ridder, Josje, van Holsteyn, Joop, and Koole, Ruud. 2015. “Party Membership in the Netherlands” in Party Members and Activists, eds. van Haute, Emilie and Gauja, Anika. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dow, Jay K. and Endersby, James W.. 2004. “Multinomial Probit and Multinomial Logit: A Comparison of Choice Models for Voting Research.” Electoral Studies 23(1):107122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., Peterson, Erik, and Slothuus, Rune. 2013. “How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation.” American Political Science Review 107(1):5779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: John Wiley. Translated by North, Barbara and North, Robert.Google Scholar
Elgot, Jessica. 2016. “Labour NEC Wins Bid to Deny New Members a Leadership Vote.” The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/aug/12/labour-wins-appeal-against-ruling-allowing-new-members-a-leadership-voteGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Leon D. 1967. Political Parties in Western Democracies. New York: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Ezrow, Lawrence, Catherine De Vries, Marco Steenbergen, and Edwards, Erica. 2011. “Mean Voter Representation and Partisan Constituency Representation: Do Parties Respond to the Mean Voter Position or to their Supporters?Party Politics 17(3):275301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faucher-King, Florence and Treille, Eric. 2003. “Managing Intra-party Democracy: Comparing the French Socialist and British Labour Party Conferences.” French Politics 1(1):6182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feddersen, Timothy and Sandroni, Alvaro. 2006. “The Calculus of Ethical Voting.” International Journal of Game Theory 35(1):125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feddersen, Timothy J. 2004. “Rational Choice Theory and the Paradox of Not Voting.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(1):99112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard. 1978. Home Style: House Members in their Districts. Boston, MA: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Ferraz, Claudio and Finan, Frederico. 2011. “Electoral Accountability and Corruption: Evidence from the Audits of Local Governments.” American Economic Review 101(4):12741311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1976. “The Voting Decision: Instrumental and Expressive Aspects.” The Journal of Politics 38(2):390413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortunato, David, Lin, Nick C.N., Stevenson, Randolph T. and Wessel Tromborg, Mathias. 2021. “Attributing Policy Influence under Coalition Governance.” American Political Science Review 115(1):252268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frendreis, John, Gitelson, Alan R., Jenkins, Shannon, and Roscoe, Douglas D.. 2003. “Testing Spatial Models of Elections: The Influence of Voters and Elites on Candidate Issue Positions.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28(1):77101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabel, Matthew J and Huber, John D. 2000. “Putting Parties in their Place: Inferring Party Left-right Ideological Positions from Party Manifestos Data.” American Journal of Political Science 44(1):94103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Michael. 1988. “Introductionand “Conclusion” in Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secret Garden of Politics, eds. Gallagher, Michael and Marsh, Michael. London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Michael and Marsh, Michael. 2002. Days of Blue Loyalty: The Politics of Membership of the Fine Gael Party. Dublin, IE: PSAI Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Michael and Marsh, Michael. 2004. “Party Membership in Ireland: The Members of the Fine Gael.” Party Politics 10(4):407425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasgow, Garrett. 2001. “Mixed Logit Models for Multiparty Elections.” Political Analysis 9(1):116136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golder, Matt, Golder, Sona N, and Siegel, David A. 2012. “Modeling the Institutional Foundation of Parliamentary Government Formation.” The Journal of Politics 74(2):427445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golder, Sona N. 2010. “Bargaining Delays in the Government Formation Process.” Comparative Political Studies 43(1):332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golder, Sona Nadenichek. 2006. The Logic of Pre-Electoral Coalition Formation. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Donald, Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identity of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, Zachary and Haber, Matthias. 2016. “Leadership Competition and Disagreement at Party National Congresses.” British Journal of Political Science 46(3):611632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Zachary and Haber, Matthias. 2017. “Maintaining Partisan ties: Preference divergence and partisan collaboration in Western Europe.” Party Politics 23(1):3042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grofman, Bernard. 2004. “Downs and Two-Party Convergence.” Annual Review of Political Science 7(1):2546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmel, Robert and Janda, Kenneth. 1994. “An Integrated Theory of Party Goals and Party Change.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 6(3):259287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, John C. 1977. “Morality and the Theory of Rational Behavior.” Social Research: An International Quarterly 44(4):623656.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, John C. 1992. “Game and Decision Theoretic Models in Ethics.” Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications 1:669707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspel, Moshe, Remington, Thomas F, and Smith, Steven S. 1998. “Electoral Institutions and Party Cohesion in the Russian Duma.” The Journal of Politics 60(2):417439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassell, Hans J. G. 2016. “Party Control of Party Primaries: Party Influence in Nominations for the U.S. Senate.” The Journal of Politics 78(1):7587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazan, Reuven Y. 1997. “Executive-legislative Relations in an Era of Accelerated Reform: Reshaping Government in Israel.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22(3):329350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazan, Reuven Y and Rahat, Gideon. 2000. “Representation, Electoral Reform, and Democracy: Theoretical and Empirical Lessons from the 1996 Elections in Israel.” Comparative Political Studies 33(10):13101336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazan, Reuven Y. and Rahat, Gideon. 2010. Democracy Within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and their Political Consequences. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidar, Knut. 2015. “Party Membership in Norway” in Party Members and Activists, eds. van Haute, Emilie and Gauja, Anika. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heidar, Knut and Saglie, Jo. 2003. “A Decline of Linkage? Intra-Party Participation in Norway, 1991–2000.” European Journal of Political Research 42(6):761786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermansen, Jan H., Lars Bille, Roger Buch, Jørgen Elklit, Bernhard Hansen, Jørgen Nielsen, Hans, and Pedersen, Karina. 2003. Undersøgelsen af medlemmerne af de danske partiorganisationer: dokumentation. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Hinojosa, Magda. 2012. Selecting Women, Electing Women: Political Representation and Candidate Selection in Latin America. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Hirano, Shigeo and Snyder, James M., Jr. 2019. Primary Elections in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=kiUBwgEACAAJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hobolt, Sara Binzer, and Klemmensen, Robert. 2008. “Government Responsiveness and Political Competition in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 41(3):309337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkin, Jonathon. 2001. “Bringing the Members Back In? Democratizing Candidate Selection in Britain and Spain.” Party Politics 7(3):343361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotelling, Harold. 1929. “Stability in Competition.” The Economic Journal 39(153):4157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John D. 1996. Rationalizing Parliament: Legislative Institutions and Party Politics in France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John D. and Bingham Powell, G., Jr. 1994. “Congruence between Citizens and Policymakers in Two Visions of Liberal Democracy.” World Politics 46(3):291326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John D., Kernell, Georgia, and Leoni, Eduardo L.. 2005. “Institutional Context, Cognitive Resources and Party Attachments Across Democracies.” Political Analysis 13(4):365386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichino, Nahomi and Nathan, Noah L. 2013. “Do Primaries Improve Electoral Performance? Clientelism and Intra-Party Conflict in Ghana.” American Journal of Political Science 57(2):428441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Indridason, Indridi H. and Helgi Kristinsson, Gunnar. 2013. “Primary Consequences: The Effects of Candidate Selection through Party Primaries in Iceland.” Party Politics 21(4):565576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA). 2022. “Compulsory Voting.” www.idea.int/data-tools/data/voter-turnout/compulsory-votingGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben and Soskice, David. 2006. “Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More than Others.” American Political Science Review 100(2):165181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jääskeläinen, Arto. 2003. The Finnish Election System: Overview. Helsinki, Finland: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1983. The Politics of Congressional Elections. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Janda, Kenneth. 1980. Political Parties; A Cross-National Survey. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, M Kent, Stoker, Laura, and Bowers, Jake. 2009. “Politics across generations: Family transmission reexamined.” The Journal of Politics 71(3):782799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessee, Stephen A. 2010. “Voter Ideology and Candidate Positioning in the 2008 Presidential Election.” American Politics Research 38(2):195210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John Sides, Chris Tausanovitch, Vavreck, Lynn, and Warshaw, Christopher. 2018. “On the Representativeness of Primary Electorates.” British Journal of Political Science 50(2):677685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Boris. 2019. “Boris Johnson’s Guarantee.” www.conservatives.com/our-planGoogle Scholar
Jowell, Tessa. 2016. “Good Morning Britain.” Interview by ITV. June 29, 2016. Video.Google Scholar
Kam, Christopher J. 2009. Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics. New York:Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp, Jeffrey A. and Banducci, Susan A.. 2008. “Political Efficacy and Participation in Twenty-Seven Democracies: How Electoral Systems Shape Political Behaviour.” British Journal of Political Science 38(2):311334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher F. and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2015. “Who Caucuses? An Experimental Approach to Institutional Design and Electoral Participation.” British Journal of Political Science 45(2):329351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard S. 2001. “The Problem of Candidate Selection and Models of Party Democracy.” Party Politics 7(3):277296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter. 1992. Party Organizations: A Data Handbook on Party Organizations in Western Democracies, 1960–90. London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter. 1994. How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party.” Party Politics 1(1):528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard S., Peter Mair, Luciano Bardi, Bille, Lars, Deschouwer, Kris et al. 1992. “The Membership of Political Parties in European Democracies, 1960–1990.” European Journal of Political Research 22(3):329345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kedar, Orit. 2005. “When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancing in Parliamentary Elections.” American Political Science Review 99(2):185199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keefer, Philip. 2007. “Clientelism, Credibility, and the Policy Choices of Young Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 51(4):804821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemahlioglu, Ozge, Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca, and Hirano, Shigeo. 2009. “Why Primaries in Latin American Presidential Elections?The Journal of Politics 71(1):339352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney, Patrick J. and Rice, Tom W.. 1987. “The Relationship between Divisive Primaries and General Election Outcomes.” American Journal of Political Science 31(1):3144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernell, Georgia. 2013. Political Party Organizations, Civic Representation, and Participation. In Representation: Elections and Beyond, ed. Jack, H Nagel and Rogers, M Smith. New York, NY: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Kernell, Georgia. 2015. “Party Nomination Rules and Campaign Participation.” Comparative Political Studies 28(3):233255.Google Scholar
Key, V.O. 1956. American State Politics: An Introduction. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Key, V.O. 1958. Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1989. Congressman’s Voting Decisions. 3rd ed. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchheimer, Otto. 1966. “The Transformation of West European Party Systems” in Political Parties and Political Development, eds. Joseph LaPalombara and Myron Weiner. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 177200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1988. “Organization and Strategy of Belgian and West German Ecology Parties: A New Dynamic of Party Politics in Western Europe?Comparative Politics 20(2):127154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1989. “The Internal Politics of Parties: The Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited.” Political Studies 37(3):400421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Hofferbert, Richard I., and Budge, Ian. 1994. Parties, Policies, and Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Koole, Ruud. 2007. “Partymembers: Representing the Voters and Selecting the Leaders with Evidence from the Dutch Case.” unpublished manuscript presented at the May 2007 meeting of the ECPR Joint Sessions, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Kosiara-Pedersen, Karina. 2015. “Party Membership in Denmark” in Party Members and Activists, eds. van Haute, Emilie and Gauja, Anika. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kosiara-Pedersen, Karina, Scarrow, Susan E, and Van Haute, Emilie. 2017. “Rules of Engagement? Party Membership Costs, New Forms of Party Affiliation, and Partisan Participation” in Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation, and Power, eds. Susan, E. Scarrow, Paul, D. Webb, and Thomas Poguntke. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 234258.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kropko, Jonathan. 2008. Choosing between Multinomial Logit and Multinomial Probit Models for Analysis or Unordered Choice Data. Ph.D. thesis, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Laakso, Markku and Taagepera, Rein. 1979. “‘Effective’ Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12(1):327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labour Party of Britain. 2013. “The Labour Party Rule Book.” www.labour.org.uk.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael and Garry, John. 2000. “Estimating Policy Positions from Political Texts.” American Journal of Political Science 44(3):619634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaverMichael, and Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1996. Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2003. “From Labor Politics to Machine Politics: The Transformation of Party-union Linkages in Argentine Peronism, 1983–1999.” Latin American Research Review 38(3):336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberal Party of Canada. 2016. “Constitution of the Liberal Party of Canada.” www.liberal.ca/legacy-uploads/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/constitution-en.pdf.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lundell, Krister. 2004. “Determinants of Candidate Selection: The Degree of Centralization in Comparative Perspective.” Party Politics 10(1):2547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madrid, Raúl. 2005. “Ethnic Cleavages and Electoral Volatility in Latin America.” Comparative Politics 38(1):120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Peter. 1997. Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 2008. “Electoral Volatility and the Dutch Party System: A Comparative Perspective.” Acta Politica 43(2–3):235253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Peter and van Biezen, Ingrid. 2001. “Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies, 1980-2000.” Party Politics 7(1):521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattila, Mikko and Raunio, Tapio. 2006. “Cautious Voters-Supportive Parties.” European Union Politics 7(4):427449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, John D. 1973. “Opinion Structure of Political Parties: The Special Law of Curvilinear Disparity.” Political Studies 21(2):135151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Thomas Erskine. 2015. Treatise on the Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament (Cambridge Library Collection – British and Irish History, 19th Century). First published in 1844. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
May’s Special Law of Curvilinear Disparity in East-Central Europe: Pragmatists and Ideologues in the Czech Christian Democratic Party. 2007. unpublished manuscript presented at the May 2007 meeting of the ECPR Joint Sessions, Helsinki.Google Scholar
McCurley, Carl and Mondak, Jeffery J.. 1995. “Inspected by #1184063113: The Influence of Incumbents’ Competence and Integrity in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 39(4):864–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, Anthony J. 2002. “The Advantages of Ideological Cohesion: A Model of Constituency Representation and Electoral Competition in Multiparty Democracies.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 14(1):3770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, Barrie. 2016. “Trudeau aims to ‘open’ Liberal Party, offer free membership.” www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/trudeau-pushing-to-tranform-liberal-party-membership-rules/article29505140/Google Scholar
McKenzie, Robert T. 1955. British Political Parties: the Distribution of Power within the Conservative and Labour Parties. London: Heinemann Educational Publishers.Google Scholar
Meguid, Bonnie M. 2005. “Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success.” American Political Science Review 99(3):347359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meguid, Bonnie M. 2008. Party Competition between Unequals: Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michels, Robert. 1962. Political parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Free Press. Originally published in 1911.Google Scholar
Miliband, Edward. 2015. Reported in The Independent article (no authors listed) (September 12, 2015) “Jeremy Corbyn Wins Labour Leadership Contest: As it Happened.” www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/jeremy-corbyn-wins-labour-leadership-contGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E and Stokes, Donald E. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57(1):4556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1995. “Competence, Integrity, and the Electoral Success of Congressional Incumbents.” Journal of Politics 48(4):1043–69.Google Scholar
Morton, Rebecca B. 1987. “A group majority voting model of public good provision.” Social Choice and Welfare 4(2):117131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, Rebecca B. 1991. “Groups in rational turnout models.” American Journal of Political Science 35(3):758776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moskowitz, Daniel J. and Schneer, Benjamin. 2019. “Reevaluating Competition and Turnout in U.S. House Elections.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 14(2):191223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand. 1998. “Explaining the Electoral Success of Green Parties: A Cross-national Analysis.” Environmantal Politics 7(4):145154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang C. and Strøm, Kaare. 1999. Policy, Office, or Votes?: How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narud, Hanne Marthe and Skare, Audun. 1999. “Are Party Activists the Party Extremists? The Patterns of Opinion in Political Parties.” Scandinavian Political Studies 22(1):4565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassmacher, Karl-Heinz and Ballington, Julie. 2003. Funding of Political Parties and Election Campaigns. Stockholm: International IDEA.Google Scholar
NBC News/Wall Street Journal. 2015. “NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll: March 2015 [Dataset].” Roper #31113638, Version. Hart Research Associates/Public Opinion Strategies [producer]. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research [distributor].Google Scholar
Norrander, Barbara. 1989. “Ideological Representativeness of Presidential Primary Voters.” American Journal of Political Science 33(3):570587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1995. “May’s Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited: Leaders, Officers, Members and Voters in British Political Parties.” Party Politics 1(1):2947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2002. Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrogorski, Moisei. 1964. Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. Originally published in 1902.Google Scholar
Panebianco, Angelo. 1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Karina, Lars Bille, Roger Buch, Elklit, Jørgen, Hansen, Bernhard, and Jørgen Nielsen, Hans. 2004. “Sleeping or Active Partners? Danish Party Members at the Turn of the Millennium.” Party Politics 10(4):367383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Mogens N. 1979. “The Dynamics of European Party Systems: Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility.” European Journal of Political Research 7(1):126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peer, Eyal, Brandimarte, Laura, Samat, Sonam, and Acquisti, Alessandro. 2017. “Beyond the Turk: Alternative Platforms for Crowdsourcing Behavioral Research.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 70:153163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pemstein, Daniel, Marquardt, Kyle L., Eitan Tzelgov, Yi-ting Wang, Juraj Medzihorsky, Joshua Krusell, Miri, Farhad, and von Römer, Johannes. 2022. The V-Dem Measurement Model: Latent Variable Analysis for Cross-National and Cross-Temporal Expert-Coded Data. V-Dem Working Paper No. 21, University of Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute.Google Scholar
Pennings, Paul and Hazan, Reuven Y.. 2001. “Democratizing Candidate Selection: Causes and Consequences.” Party Politics 7(3):267275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilet, Jean-Benoit and Cross, William. 2014. The Selection of Political Party Leaders in Contemporary Parliamentary Democracies: A Comparative Study. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poguntke, Thomas. 1993. Alternative Politics: The German Green Party. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. 1983. Consequences of Party Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Eleanor Neff and Tucker, Joshua A. 2014. “Revisiting Electoral Volatility in Post-Communist Countries: New Data, New Results and New Approaches.” British Journal of Political Science 44(1):123147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Jr., G. Bingham. 2000. Elections As Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam and Sprague, John. 1986. Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ranney, Austin. 1965. Pathways to Parliament: Candidate Selection in Britain. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Ranney, Austin. 1981. “Candidate Selection” in Democracy at the Polls: A Comparative Study of Competitive National Elections, eds. David Butler, Howard R. Penniman, and Austin Ranney. Washington, DC and London: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, pp. 75106.Google Scholar
Rayner, Gordon. 2016. “The Inside Story of how Boris Johnson’s 2016 Leadership Campaign was Torpedoed by Michael Gove.” The Guardian. www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/06/20/inside-story-boris-johnsons-2016-leadership-campaign-torpedoedGoogle Scholar
Reith, Peter. 2011. Review of the 2010 Federal Election. Technical report Liberal Party.Google Scholar
Rosema, Martin. 2006. “Partisanship, candidate evaluations, and prospective voting.” Electoral Studies 25(3):467488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbluth, Frances McCall and Shapiro, Ian. 2018. Responsible Parties: Saving Democracy from Itself. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J. and Mark Hansen, John. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Saglie, Jo and Heidar, Knut. 2004. “Democracy within Norwegian Political Parties: Complacency or Pressure for Change?Party Politics 10(4):385405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scarrow, Susan E. 1994. “The ‘Paradox of Enrollment’: Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Party Memberships.” European Journal of Political Research 25(1):4160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarrow, Susan E. 2015. Beyond Party Members: Changing Approaches to Partisan Mobilization. New York: Oxford Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
Scarrow, Susan E. and Gezgor, Burcu. 2010. “Declining Memberships, Changing Members? European Political Party Members in a New Era.” Party Politics 16(6):823843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarrow, Susan E., Webb, Paul D., and Poguntke, Thomas (eds.). 2017. Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation, and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarrow, Susan E., Webb, Paul, and Farrell, David. 2000. “From Social Integration to Electoral Contestation: The Changing Distribution of Power Within Political Parties” in Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, eds. Dalton, Russell and Wattenberg, Martin. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 129156.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Farrar and Rinehart, Inc.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1984. “On the Theory of Party Organization.” The Journal of Politics 46(2):369400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Serra, Gilles. 2011. “Why Primaries? The Party’s Tradeoff Between Policy and Valence.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 23(1):2151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyd, Patrick and Whiteley, Paul. 1992. Labour’s Grass Roots: The Politics of Party Membership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyd, Patrick and Whiteley, Paul. 2004. “British Party Members: An Overview.” Party Politics 10(4):355366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shachar, Ron and Nalebuff, Barry. 1999. “Follow the Leader: Theory and Evidence on Political Participation.” American Economic Review 89(3):525547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Eric. 2021. “The UK and the Labour Party” in Europe and the Left: Resisting the Populist Tide, ed. James, L. Newell. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 189210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shomer, Yael. 2009. “Candidate Selection Procedures, Seniority, and Vote-seeking Behavior.” Comparative Political Studies 42(7):945970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, James M., Jr. and Michael M Ting. 2011. “Electoral Selection with Parties and Primaries.” American Journal of Political Science 55(4):782796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somer-Topcu, Zeynep. 2017. “Agree or Disagree: How do Party Leader Changes affect the Distribution of Voters’ Perceptions.” Party Politics 23(1):6675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, Stuart N and Wlezien, Christopher. 2010. Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spoon, Jae-Jae. 2011. Political Survival of Small Parties in Europe. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spoon, Jae-Jae and Klüver, Heike. 2014. “Do Parties Respond? How Electoral Context Influences Party Responsiveness.” Electoral Studies 35:4860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spoon, Jae-Jae and Klüver, Heike. 2019. “Party Convergence and Vote Switching: Explaining Mainstream Party Decline across Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 58(4):10211042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, S. C. 1999. “Political Parties and Democracy.” Annual Review of Political Science 2(1):243267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strogatz, Steven H. 1994. Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Tavits, Margit. 2013. Post-Communist Democracies and Party Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, Richard. 1980. “Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1(1):3960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudeau, Justin, quoted in article by Elizabeth McMillan and David Irish. 2016. “Justin Trudeau calls for more ‘open and accessible’ Liberal Party at Halifax meeting.” www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/ns-liberal-agm-1.3517532Google Scholar
Uhlaner, Carole J. 1989. “Rational Turnout: The Neglected Role of Groups.” American Journal of Political Science 33(2):390422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valen, Henry and Marthe Narud, Hanne. 2007. “The Conditional Party Mandate: A Model for the Study of Mass and Elite Opinion Patterns.” European Journal of Political Research 46(3):293318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Biezen, Ingrid. 2004. “Political Parties as Public Utilities.” Party Politics 10(6):701722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Biezen, Ingrid. 2005. “On the Theory and Practice of Party Formation and Adaptation in New Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 44(1):147174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Haute, Emilie and Gauja, Anika. 2015. “Conclusion” in Party Members and Activists, eds. van Haute, Emilie and Gauja, Anika. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Haute, Emilie and Gauja, Anika (eds.). 2015. Party Members and Activists. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Haute, Emilie, Anissa Amjahad, Arthur Borriello, Close, Caroline, and Sandri, Giulia. 2013. “Party Members in a Pillarised Partitocracy. An Empirical Overview of Party Membership Figures and Profiles in Belgium.” Acta Politica 48(1):6891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Haute, Emilie and Paulis, Emilien. Accessed 2018. MAPP Dataset Version 2.0. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.61234Google Scholar
van Haute, Emilie, Paulis, Emilien, and Sierens, Vivien. 2018. “Assessing Party Membership Figures: the MAPP Dataset.” European Political Science 17:366377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Nie, Norman H., and Jae on Kim. 1987. Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparison. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ware, Alan. 1996. Political Parties and Party Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, Tom. 2016. “Tom Watson: My Party is in Peril.” Interview by BBC. June 29, 2016. Video, 00:13. www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-politics-36668607Google Scholar
Watts, Jake and Bale, Tim. 2019. “Populism as an Intra-Party Phenomenon: The British Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 21(1):99115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, Steven. 2007. “Intraparty Opinion Structure, Dominant Factions and Party Behavior: Moving Beyond May’s Law.” unpublished manuscript presented at the May 2007 meeting of the ECPR Joint Sessions, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Wessels, Bernhard. 1999. European Parliament and Interest Groups. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press, chapter 6, pp. 105128.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Paul. 2009. “Government Effectiveness and Political Participation in Britain.” Representation 45(1):2144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, Paul F. 2011. “Is the Party Over? The Decline of Party Activism and Membership across the Democratic World.” Party Politics 17(1):2144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, Paul F and Seyd, Patrick. 1996. “Rationality and Party Activism: Encompassing Tests of Alternative Models of Political Participation.” European Journal of Political Research 29(2):215234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, Paul F. and Seyd, Patrick. 1998. “The Dynamics of Party Activism in Britain: A Spiral of Demobilization?British Journal of Political Science 28(1):113137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, Paul F. and Seyd, Patrick. 2002. High-Intensity Participation. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, Paul F, Seyd, Patrick, Richardson, Jeremy, and Bissell, Paul. 1994. “Explaining Party Activism: The Case of the British Conservative Party.” British Journal of Political Science 24(1):7994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, Paul, Seyd, Patrick, and Richardson, Jeremy. 1994. True Blues: The Politics of Conservative Party Membership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widfeldt, Anders. 1995. “Party Membership and Party Representativeness” in Beliefs in Government Volume One: Citizens and the State, eds. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter and Fuchs, Dieter. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 134182.Google Scholar
Young, Lisa and Cross, William. 2002. “The Rise of Plebiscitary Democracy in Canadian Political Parties.” Party Politics 8(6):673699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Georgia Kernell, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Book: Inside Parties
  • Online publication: 25 February 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009514705.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Georgia Kernell, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Book: Inside Parties
  • Online publication: 25 February 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009514705.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Georgia Kernell, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Book: Inside Parties
  • Online publication: 25 February 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009514705.014
Available formats
×