Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Figure
- List of table
- Notes on contributors
- Introduction
- Part I What are human rights?
- Part II How do human rights relate to group rights and culture?
- Part III What do human rights require of the global economy?
- Part IV How do human rights relate to environmental policy?
- 11 Human rights in a hostile climate
- 12 A human rights approach to energy, poverty and gender inequality
- 13 Pollution wolves in scientific sheep’s clothing
- Part V Is there a human right to democracy?
- Part VI What are the limits of rights enforcement?
- Part VII Are human rights progressive?
- Index
- References
11 - Human rights in a hostile climate
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2013
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Figure
- List of table
- Notes on contributors
- Introduction
- Part I What are human rights?
- Part II How do human rights relate to group rights and culture?
- Part III What do human rights require of the global economy?
- Part IV How do human rights relate to environmental policy?
- 11 Human rights in a hostile climate
- 12 A human rights approach to energy, poverty and gender inequality
- 13 Pollution wolves in scientific sheep’s clothing
- Part V Is there a human right to democracy?
- Part VI What are the limits of rights enforcement?
- Part VII Are human rights progressive?
- Index
- References
Summary
According to mainstream science, humanity faces a time of emerging global environmental crises. Massive increases in economic output and human population over the last two centuries or so are putting increasing pressure on natural systems, including those basic to the support of human and other forms of life, such as climate, fresh water, oceans and natural habitat. In this context, hard questions arise about how a human rights approach can help us to understand and act on these concerns.
This chapter investigates such questions through the example of global climate change. It makes three central claims. First, climate change and similar problems pose a profound ethical challenge to existing institutions and theories. Second, a human rights approach can play a role in addressing this challenge through its articulation, development and defense of a basic but often neglected ethical intuition. Nevertheless, third, there remains much to be done. In particular, early work tends to overplay the initial advantages of human rights as such, and underestimate the role played by specific conceptions of human rights that are much more controversial and ambitious. Moreover, current human rights paradigms are not directed to the central characteristics of the profound challenge. Given all this, a practical and theoretical reorientation is needed. This has implications for the evolving project of political philosophy on a global, intergenerational and ecological scale.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Human RightsThe Hard Questions, pp. 211 - 230Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013
References
. 2011. “Does Anthropogenic Climate Change Violate Human Rights?” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14, 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Climate Change and Human Rights: Unpacking the Issues.” Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 38, 511–524.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Cosmopolitan Justice, Rights and Climate Change.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 19, 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2008. “Human Rights, Climate Change, and Discounting.” Environmental Politics 17, 536–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2009. “Climate Change and the Future: Discounting for Time, Wealth, and Risk.” Journal of Social Philosophy 40, 163–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2010. “Climate Change, Human Rights and Moral Thresholds.” In Stephen Humphreys, ed., Human Rights and Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in Stephen M. Gardiner, Simon Caney, Dale Jamieson and Henry Shue, eds., Climate Ethics: Essential Readings. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 255–278. (Page references are to this version.)Google Scholar
. 2009. Decision 2/ CP.15, “Copenhagen Accord,” in FCCC/CP/2009/11/Add.1
and . 1992. “Against the Social Discount Rate.” In Peter Laslett and James Fiskin, eds., Justice Between Age Groups and Generations. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 144–161.Google Scholar
. 1967. “The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect.”Oxford Review 5: 5–15.Google Scholar
2004. “The Global Warming Tragedy and the Dangerous Illusion of the Kyoto Protocol.” Ethics and International Affairs 18, 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011a. A Perfect Moral Storm: The Ethical Challenge of Climate Change. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011b. “Rawls and Climate Change: Does Rawlsian Political Philosophy Pass the Global Test?” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14: 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011c. “Is No One Responsible for Global Environmental Tragedy? Climate Change as a Challenge to Our Ethical Concepts.” In Denis Arnold, ed., Ethics and Global Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, pp. 38–59.Google Scholar
2007. “Human Rights versus Emission Rights: Climate Justice and the Equitable Distribution of Ecological Space.” Ethics and International Affairs 21, 431–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. 2010. Human Rights and Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
. 2008. Climate Change and Human Rights: A Rough Guide. Geneva: International Council on Human Rights.Google Scholar
. 1992. “Ethics, Public Policy and Global Warming.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 17, 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2010. “Climate Change, Responsibility and Justice.” Science and Engineering Ethics 16, 431–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
. Unpublished. “Human Rights, Future Generations and Climate Change: New Synergy or Costly Distraction?” Manuscript on file with author.
, and . 2011. Human Rights and Climate Change: A Review of the International Legal Dimensions. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “Historical Injustice and the Right of Return.” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 5, 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 2005. “Article 2 of the UNFCCC: Historical Origins, Recent Interpretations.” Climatic Change 73: 195–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Foreword.” In ICHRP, Climate Change and Human Rights: A Rough Guide. Geneva: International Council on Human Rights, pp. v–vi.Google Scholar
. 2010. “The Increasing Currency and Relevance of Rights-Based Perspectives in the International Negotiations on Climate Change.” Journal of Environmental Law 22: 391–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Foreword.” In ICHRP, Climate Change and Human Rights: A Rough Guide. Geneva: International Council on Human Rights, pp. iii–iv.Google Scholar
. 1992. “The Unavoidability of Justice.” In Andrew Hurrell and Benedict Kingsbury, eds., The International Politics of the Environment. Oxford University Press, pp. 373–97.Google Scholar
. 1972. Stockholm Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment.
2007. Malé Declaration on the Human Dimension of Global Climate Change (November 14, 2007).
. 1992. Available at: .
. 2009. Report on the Relationship Between Climate Change and Human Rights, UN Doc. A/HRC/10/61 (January 15, 2009).
. 2008. Atmospheric Justice: A Political Theory of Climate Change. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 9
- Cited by