Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Figure
- List of table
- Notes on contributors
- Introduction
- Part I What are human rights?
- Part II How do human rights relate to group rights and culture?
- 4 The significance of cultural differences for human rights
- 5 Groups and human rights
- 6 Entangled
- 7 What does cultural difference require of human rights?
- Part III What do human rights require of the global economy?
- Part IV How do human rights relate to environmental policy?
- Part V Is there a human right to democracy?
- Part VI What are the limits of rights enforcement?
- Part VII Are human rights progressive?
- Index
- References
5 - Groups and human rights
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2013
By
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Figure
- List of table
- Notes on contributors
- Introduction
- Part I What are human rights?
- Part II How do human rights relate to group rights and culture?
- 4 The significance of cultural differences for human rights
- 5 Groups and human rights
- 6 Entangled
- 7 What does cultural difference require of human rights?
- Part III What do human rights require of the global economy?
- Part IV How do human rights relate to environmental policy?
- Part V Is there a human right to democracy?
- Part VI What are the limits of rights enforcement?
- Part VII Are human rights progressive?
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
Human rights are rights possessed by human beings, and human beings are individual beings. An individualism that gives primary moral standing to individuals is therefore built into the very idea of human rights. However, the description “individualist” is often applied to human rights in a more far-reaching and pejorative sense. Human rights are sometimes said to manifest an atomistic conception of human life in which individuals are set apart from one another and channeled away from communal to more individualistic forms of life. Human rights, the charge goes, fail to recognize and to provide adequately for the social nature of human beings and the value of human community. The charge is not easily sustained (Howard 1995). Human rights are thoroughly social in both context and purpose and, rather than steering people away from communities, they aim to secure the freedoms and social arrangements that are essential for living a decent human life of any sort, including the most communitarian of communal forms of life.
There is, however, one aspect of the argument over the “individualism” of human rights that continues to divide the proponents of human rights as well as to attract the attention of the critics: the relationship between groups and human rights. There is continuing division over whether human rights can be group rights or whether they can be possessed only by individuals taken severally. It is that question that I investigate in this chapter.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Human RightsThe Hard Questions, pp. 100 - 114Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013
References
. 2005. “Human Rights, Individualism and Cultural Diversity.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8: 265–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Universal Rights in Theory and Practice, 2nd edn. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
2007. “The Relative Universality of Human Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 29: 281–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. 2005. Minorities within Minorities: Equality, Rights and Diversity. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
1996. Taking Suffering Seriously: The Importance of Collective Human Rights. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
1994. “Human Rights, Peoples, and the Right to Self-Determination.” In , ed., Group Rights. Toronto University Press, pp. 186–214.Google Scholar
. 1991. “Some Confusions Concerning Collective Rights.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 4: 292–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1999. “Group Rights and Group Oppression.” Journal of Political Philosophy 7: 353–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2010. “Cultures, Group Rights and Group-Differentiated Rights.” In Maria Dimova-Cookson and Peter Stirk, eds., Multiculturalism and Moral Conflict. London: Routledge, pp. 38–57.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Recasting the Right to Self-Determination: Group Rights and Political Participation.” Social Theory and Practice 30: 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2002. “Group Rights, Human Rights and Citizenship.” European Journal of Philosophy 10: 178–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. “Collective Interests and Collective Rights.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 49: 127–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2002. “Mistresses of their own Destiny: Group Rights, Gender and Realistic Rights of Exit.” Ethics 112: 205–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997. “Group Rights and Ethnicity.” In Ian Shapiro and Will Kymlicka, eds., Ethnicity and Group Rights. New York University Press, pp. 187–221.Google Scholar
. 2001. Multicultural Jurisdictions: Cultural Differences and Women’s Rights. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1999. “Against Collective Rights.” In Steven Lukes and Christian Joppke, eds., Multicultural Questions. Oxford University Press, pp. 158–180.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 4
- Cited by