BMI-Based Figure Rating Scale for Chinese Adolescents (C-BMI-FRS)

doi:10.1017/9781009398275.014

Chapter 13 - BMI-Based Figure Rating Scale for Chinese Adolescents (C-BMI-FRS)

Published online by Cambridge University Press: aN Invalid Date NaN

Kui Wang ,

Chao-Ran Yu and

Heather L. Littleton

Edited by

Virginia Ramseyer Winter ,

Tracy L. Tylka and

Antoinette M. Landor

Show author details

Virginia Ramseyer Winter: Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Tracy L. Tylka: Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Antoinette M. Landor: Affiliation:
University of Missouri

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The Body Mass Index-Based Figure Rating Scale for Chinese Adolescents (C-BMI-FRS; Yu et al., 2022) provides a brief way to assess the body dissatisfaction of Chinese adolescents via calculating the discrepancy between their chosen actual and ideal body silhouettes. Height, weight, sex, and age data was calculated from a large sample of Chinese adolescents and a professional artist drew four equal height silhouettes for each sex (girls, boys) based on these data. The four silhouettes, which represented BMI values at the 20th, 40th, 60th, and 80th percentiles, were placed above a horizontal bar with 25 grids. Respondents choose the number (1-25) that represents the figure that they actually have and the figure they ideally would like to have. Their chosen ideal figure is then subtracted from their chosen actual figure. The figures and logistics of use, such as permissions, copyright, and contact information, are provided for readers.

Keywords

Body Mass Index-Based Figure Rating Scale for Chinese Adolescents C-BMI-FRS figure rating scale body mass index silhouettes contour drawings actual figure ideal figure actual-ideal discrepancy score China adolescents scale development psychometric evidence validity administration scoring

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Handbook of Body Image-Related Measures , pp. 38 - 39

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009398275.014 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Collins, M. E. (1991). Body figure perceptions and preferences among preadolescent children. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 10, 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-108X(199103)10:2%3C199::AID-EAT2260100209%3E3.0.CO;2-D.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRef Google Scholar

Pruis, T. A., & Janowsky, J. S. (2010). Assessment of body image in younger and older women. Journal of General Psychology, 137, 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2010.484446.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Stunkard, A. (2000). Old and new scales for the assessment of body image. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 930. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2000.90.3.930.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Yu, C-R., Yu, X-Y., Fan, Z-T., Wang, K., & Littleton, H. L. (2022). Development and validation of a BMI-based figure rating scale for Chinese adolescents. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 45(2), 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278720926714.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The PDF of this book conforms to version 2.0 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic (A) level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.

Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.

Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.

Structural and Technical Features

ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.