Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-fz5kh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-09T07:49:44.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 14 - Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in the Netherlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2025

Winfred Arthur, Jr.
Affiliation:
Texas A & M University
Dennis Doverspike
Affiliation:
George Mason University
Benjamin D. Schulte
Affiliation:
Texas A & M University
Get access

Summary

This chapter examines bias and fairness in employment testing in the Netherlands, addressing twenty key questions related to historical and cultural developments, legal frameworks, professional guidelines, and psychometric issues. Although equal treatment is a fundamental legal principle, perceptions of hiring discrimination remain widespread. The chapter explores demographic shifts that have shaped discussions on employment fairness and outlines the Dutch legal framework, focusing on the Equal Treatment Act and the role of the Netherlands Institute for Human Rights in handling discrimination complaints. It also highlights the relatively limited attention given to fairness in professional guidelines for practitioners. Furthermore, the chapter evaluates how psychological tests are assessed for bias, particularly through analyses of score differences, differential item functioning, and measurement invariance, while noting the scarcity of research on predictive bias. Emerging challenges, such as algorithmic bias, are also examined. Finally, the chapter discusses recent legislative efforts to promote fairness in employment testing, including a proposed law that was rejected in 2024.

Information

Type
Chapter

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Centraal Informatiepunt Beroepen Gezondheidszorg (2022). Over het BIG register – Cijfers [About the BIG register – Numbers]. www.bigregister.nl/over-het-big-register/cijfers.Google Scholar
Central Bureau of Statistics (2020). Barometer Culturele Diversiteit [Barometer Cultural Diversity]. www.cbs.nl/barometerculturelediversiteit.Google Scholar
Central Bureau of Statistics (2022a). Hoeveel mensen met een migratieachtergrond wonen in Nederland? [How many people with a migration background live in the Netherlands?]. www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/dossier/dossier-asiel-migratie-en-integratie/hoeveel-mensen-met-een-migratieachtergrond-wonen-in-nederland-.Google Scholar
Central Bureau of Statistics (2022b). Werkloosheid naar migratieachtergrond [Unemployment by migration background]. www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/visualisaties/dashboard-arbeidsmarkt/werklozen/werkloosheid-naar-migratieachtergrond.Google Scholar
Central Bureau of Statistics (2022c). Integratie en samenleven 2022 [Integration and society 2022]. https://longreads.cbs.nl/integratie-en-samenleven-2022/.Google Scholar
Central Bureau of Statistics (2022d). Emancipatiemonitor 2022 [Emancipation monitor 2022]. https://longreads.cbs.nl/emancipatiemonitor-2022/.Google Scholar
Central Bureau of Statistics (2022e). Arbeidsparticipatie naar leeftijd en geslacht [Employment by age and sex]. www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/visualisaties/dashboard-arbeidsmarkt/werkenden/arbeidsparticipatie-naar-leeftijd-en-geslacht.Google Scholar
Commissie Testaangelegenheden Nederland (2010). COTAN Beoordelingssysteem voor de kwaliteit van tests [Commissie Testaangelegenheden Nederland assessment system for the quality of tests]. https://psynip.nl/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/COTAN-Beoordelingssysteem-2010.pdf.Google Scholar
Commissie Testaangelegenheden Nederland (2021). Aanvulling op het COTAN beoordelingssysteem m.b.t. fairnessGoogle Scholar
de Leng, W. E., Stegers-Jager, K. M., Husbands, A., Dowell, J. S., Born, M. Ph., and Themmen, A. P. N. (2017). Scoring method of a situational judgment test: Influence on internal consistency reliability, adverse impact and correlation with personality? Advances in Health Science Education, 22, 243265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9720-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Meijer, L. A., Born, M. P., Terlouw, G., and van der Molen, H. T. (2006). Applicant and method factors related to ethnic score differences in personnel selection: A study at the Dutch police. Human Performance, 19(3), 219251. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1903_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Meijer, L. A. L., Born, M. P., van Zielst, J., and van der Molen, H. T. (2010). Construct-driven development of a video-based situational judgment test for integrity: A study in a multi-ethnic police setting. European Psychologist, 15, 229236. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Meijer, L. A. L., Born, M. Ph., van Zielst, J., and van der Molen, H. T. (2007). Analyzing judgments of ethnically diverse applicants during personnel selection: A study at the Dutch police. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 139152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00376.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Soete, B., Lievens, F., Oostrom, J., and Westerveld, L. (2013). Alternative predictors for dealing with the diversity–validity dilemma in personnel selection: The constructed response multimedia test. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21(3), 239250. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, R. (2019). Verwachte baanvindduur van werklozen [Expected job finding time of the unemployed]. Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken, 35(1), 109115. https://doi.org/10.5117/2019.035.001.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutch Institute of Social Research (2017). Grenzen aan de eenheid: De beleving en waardering van diversiteit en inclusiviteit onder medewerkers van Defensie [Boundries to unity: Perceptions and appreciation of diversity and inclusivity in the Military]. www.scp.nl/publicaties/publicaties/2017/01/13/grenzen-aan-de-eenheidGoogle Scholar
Dutch Institute of Social Research (2020). Ervaren discriminatie in Nederland II [Experienced discrimination in the Netherlands II]. www.scp.nl/publicaties/publicaties/2020/04/02/ervaren-discriminatie-in-nederland-ii.Google Scholar
Dutch Institute of Social Research (2022). Arbeidsmarkt in kaart [Mapping the labor market]. https://digitaal.scp.nl/arbeidsmarkt-in-kaart-wel-en-niet-werkenden-editie-2/.Google Scholar
Eerste Kamer der Staten Generaal (2024). Wet toezicht gelijke kansen bij werving en selectie. [Law proposal: Bill on monitoring equal opportunities in recruitment and selection]. www.eerstekamer.nl/wetsvoorstel/35673_wet_toezicht_gelijke_kansenGoogle Scholar
Egberink, I. J. L., Leng, W. E. de, and Vermeulen, C. S. M. (2022). COTAN Documentatie 2009–2022. Boom Uitgevers Amsterdam. www.cotandocumentatie.nlGoogle Scholar
Egberink, I. J. L., Meijer, R. R., and Tendeiro, J. N. (2015). Investigating measurement invariance in computer-based personality testing: The impact of using anchor items on effect size indices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 126145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164414520965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Equal Treatment in Employment (Age Discrimination) Act (2004). Overheid.nl. https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0016185/2020-01-01/0Google Scholar
Equal Treatment (Men and Women) Act (1980). Overheid.nl. https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0003299/2015-07-01/0.Google Scholar
Equal Treatment of Disabled and Chronically Ill People Act (2003). Overheid.nl. https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0014915/2020-01-01/0.Google Scholar
European Commission (2018). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). https://gdpr.eu/tag/gdpr.Google Scholar
European Commission (2022). Regulatory framework proposal on artificial intelligence. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai.Google Scholar
He, J. and van de Vijver, F. J. (2013). A general response style factor: Evidence from a multi-ethnic study in the Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(7), 794800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.06.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermanussen, R., Schellekens, E., and Serail, T. (2004). Voorkeursbeleid bij werving en selectie [Affirmative action in recruitment and selection]. https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/dossier/kst-28770-11-b2.pdf.Google Scholar
Meurkens, R. C. (2014). Punitive damages. The civil remedy in American law, lessons and caveats for continental Europe. Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nederlandse Vereniging voor Personeelsmanagement & Organisatieontwikkeling (2020). NVP recruitment code: The code of conduct for recruitment & selection. www.nvp-hrnetwerk.nl/sollicitatiecode.Google Scholar
Netherlands Institute for Human Rights (n.d.). Procedure voor de behandeling van discriminatieklachten [Procedure for handing discrimination complaints]. www.mensenrechten.nl/mensenrechten-voor-jou/discriminatie-en-gelijke-behandeling/discriminatieklachten-en-verzoek.Google Scholar
Netherlands Institute for Human Rights (2021). Werkgever zelf verantwoordelijk als algoritmes bij sollicitaties discrimineren [Employer responsible if algorithms discriminate in job applications]. www.mensenrechten.nl/actueel/nieuws/2021/12/08/werkgever-zelf-verantwoordelijk-als-algoritmes-bij-sollicitaties-discrimineren.Google Scholar
Netherlands Institute for Human Rights (2022a). Monitor discriminatiezaken over 2021 [Monitor discrimination cases in 2021]. https://publicaties.mensenrechten.nl/publicatie/5940855c-f125-4126-bc61-6c11a734051b.Google Scholar
Netherlands Institute for Human Rights (2022b). Hoe gender(on)gelijk is Nederland? Hoe zit het met gelijke beloning? [How gender (in)equal is the Netherlands? What about equal pay?]. www.mensenrechten.nl/actueel/nieuws/2022/10/08/hoe-genderongelijk-is-nederland-hoe-zit-het-met-gelijke-beloning.Google Scholar
Netherlands Institute of Psychologists (2015). Code of Ethics for Psychologists 2015. https://psynip.nl/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Code-of-ethics-Beroepscode-NIP-Engels.pdf.Google Scholar
Netherlands Institute of Psychologists (2017). Guidelines for the Use of Tests. https://psynip.nl/cotan/algemene-standaard-testgebruik-ast-nip-2017/.Google Scholar
Netherlands Institute of Psychologists (2022). Artificial intelligence – Toolbox voor psychologen [Artificial intelligence – Toolbox for psychologists]. https://psynip.nl/secties/sectie-arbeid-organisatie/tools-ao/downloads-artificial-intelligence-toolbox-voor-psychologen/.Google Scholar
Nicolaas, H. and Sprangers, A. (2007). Buitenlandse migratie in Nederland 1795–2006: De invloed op de bevolkingssamenstelling [Foreign migration in the Netherlands 1975-2006: The influence on population demographics]. Bevolkingstrends: Statistisch kwartaalblad over de demografie van Nederland, Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, 4, 3246. www.cbs.nl/-/media/imported/documents/2008/02/2007-k4-b15-p32-art.pdf.Google Scholar
Niessen, A. S. M. and Meijer, R. R. (2019). Evaluatie van het selectieproces voor de rio-opleiding [Evaluation of the selection procedure fort he rio-program]. (Research Memoranda Raad voor de Rechtspraak; Vol. 14, No. 2). Council of the Judiciary.Google Scholar
Oostrom, J. K. (2022). AI en personeelsselectie: Het psychologische perspectief [AI and personnel selection: The psychological perspective]. https://psynip.nl/secties/sectie-arbeid-organisatie/tools-ao/downloads-artificial-intelligence-toolbox-voor-psychologen/.Google Scholar
Openbaar Ministerie (2021). Discriminatie cijfers in beeld [Discrimination statistics]. www.om.nl/onderwerpen/discriminatie/documenten/publicaties/discriminatie/lecd/cijfers-in-beeld/cijfers-in-beeld.Google Scholar
Politie Onderwijsraad (2021). Op zoek naar blauw talent: Motiveren, werven, selecteren en begeleiden gericht op een diverser personeelsbestand [Finding talent: Motivating, recruiting, selecting, and supervising aimed at a more diverse workforce]. www.politieonderwijsraad.nl/download/fZl12DOusg5tLFPOAryzMSZIeyIxMFGCMtNWjnld/z3rbnTMT6qKCYihkaktlUvJYhZrQd6f1zeYp0X5K/.Google Scholar
Raad voor de Rechtspraak (2021). Rechtspraak Jaarverslag 2021 [Judiciary Annual Report 2021]. https://jaarverslagrechtspraak.nl/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2022/05/Jaarverslag-Rechtspraak-2021.pdf#page=37.Google Scholar
Rijksoverheid (n.d.). Welke vragen mogen niet gesteld worden tijdens een sollicitatiegesprek? [Which questions are not allowed during a job interview?]. www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/gelijke-behandeling-op-het-werk/vraag-en-antwoord/welke-vragen-mogen-niet-gesteld-worden-tijdens-een-sollicitatiegesprek.Google Scholar
Rijksoverheid (2021). Stijging meldingen van discriminatie in 2020, kabinet neemt extra maatregelen [Increase reports of discrimination in 2020, government takes extra measures]. www.rijksoverheid.nl/actueel/nieuws/2021/06/24/stijging-meldingen-van-discriminatie-in-2020-kabinet-neemt-extra-maatregelen.Google Scholar
Stichting Arbeidsmarkt – en Opleidingsfonds Politie (2022). Meer diversiteit door project Selectievoorbereiding politie [More diversity due to project selection preparation at the police]. https://saop.nl/nieuws/meer-diversiteit-door-project-selectievoorbereiding-politie/.Google Scholar
[Supplement to the Commissie Testaangelegenheden Nederland assessment system regarding fairness]. https://psynip.nl/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/COTAN-Herzien-Fairness-addendum-per-14-07-2021.pdf.Google Scholar
te Nijenhuis, J. and van der Flier, H. (2000). Differential prediction of immigrant versus majority group training performance using cognitive ability and personality measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 5460. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
te Nijenhuis, J., de Jong, M., Evers, A., and van der Flier, H. (2004). Are cognitive differences between immigrant and majority groups diminishing? European Journal of Personality, 18, 405434. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
te Nijenhuis, J., van Dam, K., Aarts, S., and van der Flier, H. (2014). Selectors’ decision strategies when assessing immigrant job applicants. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22, 88100. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thijssen, L., Coenders, M., and Lancee, B. (2021). Ethnic discrimination in the Dutch labor market: Differences between ethnic minority groups and the role of personal information about job applicants – Evidence from a field experiment. International Migration & Integration, 22, 11251150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-020-00795-w.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal (2023). Wetsvoorstel: Wet toezicht gelijke kansen bij werving en selectie [Law proposal: Bill on monitoring equal opportunities in recruitment and selection]. www.tweedekamer.nl/kamerstukken/wetsvoorstellen/detail?id=2020Z24749&dossier=35673.Google Scholar
Wicherts, J. M. and Dolan, C. V. (2010). Measurement invariance in confirmatory factor analysis: An illustration using IQ test performance of minorities. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 29(3), 3947. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00182.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×