Book contents
- Global Perspectives on the Definition, Assessment, and Reduction of Bias and Unfairness in Employment Testing
- Educational and Psychological Testing in a Global Context
- Global Perspectives on the Definition, Assessment, and Reduction of Bias and Unfairness in Employment Testing
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Series Editor Foreword
- Chapter 1 An Introduction to and Summary of Global Perspectives from Twenty-Three Countries on the Definition, Assessment, and Reduction of Bias and Unfairness in Employment Testing
- Chapter 2 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Australia
- Chapter 3 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Belgium
- Chapter 4 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Canada
- Chapter 5 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in China
- Chapter 6 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in France
- Chapter 7 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Germany
- Chapter 8 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Ghana
- Chapter 9 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Greece
- Chapter 10 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in India
- Chapter 11 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Italy
- Chapter 12 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Japan
- Chapter 13 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Mexico
- Chapter 14 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in the Netherlands
- Chapter 15 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Nigeria
- Chapter 16 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Poland
- Chapter 17 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Romania
- Chapter 18 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in South Africa
- Chapter 19 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in South Korea
- Chapter 20 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Spain
- Chapter 21 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Sweden
- Chapter 22 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Türkiye
- Chapter 23 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in the United Kingdom
- Chapter 24 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in the United States
- Index
- References
Chapter 19 - Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in South Korea
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 November 2025
Book contents
- Global Perspectives on the Definition, Assessment, and Reduction of Bias and Unfairness in Employment Testing
- Educational and Psychological Testing in a Global Context
- Global Perspectives on the Definition, Assessment, and Reduction of Bias and Unfairness in Employment Testing
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Series Editor Foreword
- Chapter 1 An Introduction to and Summary of Global Perspectives from Twenty-Three Countries on the Definition, Assessment, and Reduction of Bias and Unfairness in Employment Testing
- Chapter 2 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Australia
- Chapter 3 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Belgium
- Chapter 4 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Canada
- Chapter 5 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in China
- Chapter 6 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in France
- Chapter 7 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Germany
- Chapter 8 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Ghana
- Chapter 9 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Greece
- Chapter 10 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in India
- Chapter 11 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Italy
- Chapter 12 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Japan
- Chapter 13 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Mexico
- Chapter 14 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in the Netherlands
- Chapter 15 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Nigeria
- Chapter 16 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Poland
- Chapter 17 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Romania
- Chapter 18 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in South Africa
- Chapter 19 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in South Korea
- Chapter 20 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Spain
- Chapter 21 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Sweden
- Chapter 22 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in Türkiye
- Chapter 23 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in the United Kingdom
- Chapter 24 Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in the United States
- Index
- References
Summary
The Korean term insamansa – “human resources are everything” –‘captures the deep value the nation places on personnel. Despite long-standing recognition of their importance, formal selection systems have emerged only recently. This chapter examines bias and fairness in Korean personnel selection through historical, legal, and societal lenses. Korea’s transformation from the labor-intensive industries of the 1960s–1980s to a technology-driven economy in the 2000s has reshaped perceptions of employment fairness. Current workplace protections primarily address sex and disability discrimination through laws such as the Equal Employment Opportunity and Work-Family Balance Assistance Act. Although the Fair Hiring Procedure Act aims to reduce biased practices, challenges persist in ensuring the validity and fairness of selection methods. Moreover, the increasing use of artificial intelligence in hiring raises concerns over algorithmic bias. The chapter calls for evidence-based policies and robust statistical methods to improve validity and fairness in Korea’s evolving labor market.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Global Perspectives on the Definition, Assessment, and Reduction of Bias and Unfairness in Employment Testing , pp. 390 - 404Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (AERA, APA, & NCME) (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. AERA.Google Scholar
Bae, J., and Rowley, C. (2001). The impact of globalization on HRM: The case of Korea. Journal of World Business, 36(4), 402–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9516(01)00064-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, C. M. (2015). Differential validity and differential prediction of cognitive ability tests: Understanding test bias in the employment context. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 435–463. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bognanno, M. F. (1988). Korea’s industrial relations at the turning point. Korea Development Institute.Google Scholar
Cho, J. (2005). Human resource management, corporate governance structure and corporate performance in Korea: A comparative analysis of Japan, US and Korea. Japan and the World Economy, 17(4), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japwor.2004.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Corte, W., Lievens, F., and Sackett, P. R. (2007). Combining predictors to achieve optimal trade-offs between selection quality and adverse impact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1380–1393. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1380CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Corte, W., Sackett, P. R., and Lievens, F. (2020). Robustness, sensitivity, and sampling variability of Pareto-optimal selection system solutions to address the quality-diversity trade-off. Organizational Research Methods, 23(3), 535–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118825301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dos Santos, L. M. (2020). Stress, burnout, and turnover issues of Black expatriate education professionals in South Korea: Social biases, discrimination, and workplace bullying. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 3851. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113851CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eo, S., Lee, J., and Kim, Y. (2022). Verification of Adverse Impact in Korean Business Context. Journal of Organization and Management, 46, 83–108. https://doi.org/10.36459/jom.2022.46.1.83Google Scholar
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Civil Service Commission, Department of Labor, & Department of Justice (1978). Adoption by four agencies of uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. Federal Register, 43, 38290–38315.Google Scholar
Fields, G. S. (1994). Changing labor market conditions and economic development in Hong Kong, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan, China. The World Bank Economic Review, 8(3), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/8.3.395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heo, U., Jeon, H., Kim, H., and Kim, O. (2008). The political economy of South Korea: Economic growth, democratization, and financial crisis. Maryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies, 2008(2), 1–24. https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mscas/vol2008/iss2/1Google Scholar
Hough, L. M., Oswald, F. L., and Ployhart, R. E. (2001). Determinants, detection and amelioration of adverse impact in personnel selection procedures: Issues, evidence and lessons learned. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1–2), 152–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, C., and Oh, B. (2022). Taste-based gender discrimination in South Korea. Social Science Research, 104, 102671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102671CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, D. O., and Bae, J. (2017). Employment relations and HRM in South Korea. Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H. and Sung, S. (2011). The exploration on the effect of core employee management system on gender diversity – Job positions & industry memberships. The Women’s Studies, 80(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.33949/tws.2011.1.001Google Scholar
Kim, S., Zhang, C., Chung, H., Kim, Y., and Choi, S. Y. (2020). Why do women value credentials? Perceptions of gender inequality and credentialism in South Korea. International Journal of Educational Development, 73, 102158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ku, M., Ma, K., Kim, C., Cha, H., and Jung, D. (2021) Redressing systemic employment discrimination against women in Korea. Korean Women’s Development Institute.Google Scholar
Kwon, Y. (2020). The reality and history of Korean labor rights-from “respect for labor” and human rights to labor citizenship right. Industrial Labor Studies, 26(1), 217–269.Google Scholar
Kwon, S. (2021). Is Blind Recruitment fair? A theoretical review of recruitment fairness. Journal of Business Research, 36, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.22903/jbr.2021.36.1.87Google Scholar
Lim, W. (2004). The origin and evolution of the Korean economic system. In Suh, Chung-Sok and Tcha, Moon Joong (eds.), The Korean economy at the crossroads (pp. 61–72). Routledge.Google Scholar
Meade, A. W., and Fetzer, M. (2009). Test bias, differential prediction, and a revised approach for determining the suitability of a predictor in a selection context. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 738–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109331487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Human Rights Commission of Korea (2020). A study for establishing judgment standards of discrimination. NHRCK. https://library.humanrights.go.kr/search/detail/CATCAZ000000053262Google Scholar
Noh, S., and Kaspar, V. (2003). Perceived discrimination and depression: Moderating effects of coping, acculturation, and ethnic support. American Journal of Public Health, 93(2), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.2.232CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., and Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 679–703. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PyburnJr., K. M., Ployhart, R. E., and Kravitz, D. A. (2008). The diversity–validity dilemma: Overview and legal context. Personnel Psychology, 61(1), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00108.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sackett, P. R., Zhang, C., Berry, C. M., and Lievens, F. (2023). Revisiting the design of selection systems in light of new findings regarding the validity of widely used predictors. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 16(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2023.24Google Scholar
Shin, K. (2006). Social changes in contemporary Korea: Reflection on the period of rapid industrial growth. Economy and Society, 69, 10–39. http://uci.or.kr/G704-000107.2006.69.006Google Scholar
Shin, K. (2018) Fairness of employment – Focusing on recruitment corruption. Journal of Labour Law, 67, 83–118.Google Scholar
Siegel, J., Pyun, L., and Cheon, B. Y. (2019). Multinational firms, labor market discrimination, and the capture of outsider’s advantage by exploiting the social divide. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(2), 370–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218769634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP) (2018). Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures (5th ed.) SIOP. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2018.195Google Scholar
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP) (2023). Considerations and recommendations for the validation and use of AI-based assessments for employee selection. SIOP. www.siop.org/Portals/84/SIOP%20Considerations%20and%20Recommendations%20for%20the%20Validation%20and%20Use%20of%20AI-Based%20Assessments%20for%20Employee%20Selection%20010323.pdf?ver=5w576kFXzxLZNDMoJqdIMw%3d%3dGoogle Scholar
Song, Q. C., Tang, C., Newman, D. A., and Wee, S. (2023). Adverse impact reduction and job performance optimization via pareto-optimal weighting: A shrinkage formula and regularization technique using machine learning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(9), 1461–1485. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001085CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tung, R. L., Paik, Y., and Bae, J. (2013). Korean human resource management in the global context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(5), 905–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.755818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, I. (2015). Cross-cultural perceptions of clan control in Korean multinational companies: A conceptual investigation of employees’ fairness monitoring based on cultural values. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(8), 1076–1097. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.922600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.