Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-7vssv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-09T07:49:23.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6 - Twenty Questions about Employment Testing Bias and Unfairness in France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2025

Winfred Arthur, Jr.
Affiliation:
Texas A & M University
Dennis Doverspike
Affiliation:
George Mason University
Benjamin D. Schulte
Affiliation:
Texas A & M University
Get access

Summary

Selection processes in France are governed by a comprehensive legal and regulatory framework that prioritizes fairness, non-discrimination, and equal opportunity. French labor laws explicitly prohibit discrimination based on twenty-five criteria, including sex/gender, ethnicity, disability, and age. Despite these protections, disparities persist, fueling ongoing policy debates and legislative refinements. Regulatory bodies such as the Defender of Rights oversee compliance and promote unbiased hiring practices. However, implicit biases and structural barriers continue to influence employment decisions, challenging efforts to achieve true workplace equality. Employers must balance legal obligations, diversity objectives, and test validity while adapting to evolving EU regulations, such as the AI Act (2024). The introduction of diversity labels and corporate social responsibility initiatives reflects a proactive commitment to fostering inclusive workplaces. Yet enforcement challenges remain, as rising reports of workplace discrimination highlight persistent gaps. Several recommendations have been proposed to mitigate discrimination without compromising the quality and effectiveness of selection methods.

Information

Type
Chapter

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aguinis, H. and Culpepper, S. A. (2024). Improving our understanding of predictive bias in testing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(3), 402414. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amadieu, J.-F. and Roy, A. (2019). Stéréotypes et discriminations dans le recrutement [Stereotypes and discrimination in recruitment]. Hermès, La Revue, 83, 162169. https://doi.org/10.3917/herm.083.0162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assemblée nationale constituante (1789). Déclaration des Droits de l’Homme et du Citoyen [Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen]. Légifrance. Retrieved July 1, 2025, from https://shorturl.at/Ho4m0Google Scholar
Association Française de Normalisation (n.d.a). Label Diversité [Diversity Label]. Retrieved October 30, 2024, from https://certification.afnor.org/ressources-humaines/label-diversite.Google Scholar
Association Française de Normalisation (n.d.b). Label Égalité professionnelle entre les femmes et les hommes [Professional Equality Between Women and Men Label]. Retrieved October 30, 2024, from https://certification.afnor.org/ressources-humaines/label-egalite-professionnelle-entre-les-femmes-et-les-hommes.Google Scholar
Benbassa, E. and Lecerf, J.-R. (2014). Rapport d’information relatif à la lutte contre les discriminations [Information report on the fight against discrimination]. Sénat, www.senat.fr/rap/r14-094/r14-094.html.Google Scholar
Benedetto-Meyer, M. (2024). Quelles sont les caractéristiques de l’offre de formation à la non-discrimination à l’embauche? [What are the characteristics of training programs for non-discrimination in hiring?]. Direction de l’Animation de la Recherche, des Études et des Statistiques, https://dares.travail-emploi.gouv.fr/publication/quelles-sont-les-caracteristiques-de-loffre-de-formation-la-non-discrimination.Google Scholar
Bereni, L. and Epstein, R. (2015). Instrumenter la lutte contre les discriminations: Le “label diversité” dans les collectivités territoriales [Instrumenting the fight against discrimination: The “diversity label” in local authorities]. Alliance de Recherche sur les Discriminations, https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01156953v1.Google Scholar
Bergeat, M. and Rémy, V. (2017). Comment les employeurs recrutent-ils leurs salariés? [How do employers recruit their employees?]. Direction de l’Animation de la Recherche, des Études et des Statistiques, https://dares.travail-emploi.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/pdf/2017-064-.pdf.Google Scholar
Bleich, E. (2003). Histoire des politiques françaises antidiscrimination: Du déni à la lutte [History of French anti-discrimination policies: From denial to struggle]. Hommes et Migrations, 1245, 618. https://doi.org/10.3406/homig.2003.4059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bon-Maury, G., Bruneau, C., Dherbécourt, C., Diallo, A., Flamand, J., Gilles, C. and Trannoy, A. (2016). Le coût économique des discriminations [The economic cost of discrimination]. France Stratégie, www.strategie.gouv.fr/publications/cout-economique-discriminations.Google Scholar
Borrillo, D. (2002). Les instruments juridiques français et européens dans la mise en place du principe d’égalité et de non-discrimination [French and European legal instruments in establishing the principle of equality and non-discrimination]. Revue Française des Affaires Sociales, 1, 109129. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfas.021.0109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bribosia, E., Médard Inghilterra, R. and Rorive, I. (2021). Discrimination intersectionnelle en droit: Mode d’emploi [Intersectional discrimination in law: A user guide]. Revue Trimestrielle des Droits de l’Homme, 126(2), 241274. https://doi.org/10.3917/rtdh.126.0241.Google Scholar
Calvès, G. (2008). Sanctionner ou réguler: L’hésitation des politiques de lutte contre les discriminations [Sanction or regulate: The hesitation of anti-discrimination policies]. Informations Sociales, 148(4), 3445. https://doi.org/10.3917/inso.148.0034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carcillo, S. and Valfort, M.-A. (2018). Les discriminations au travail: Femmes, ethnicité, religion, âge, apparence, LGBT [Workplace discrimination: Women, ethnicity, religion, age, appearance, LGBT]. Presses de Sciences Po.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamkhi, A., Lainé, F., Lim, Y.-M., Matus, M. and Prokovas, N. (2018). Comment les employeurs sélectionnent les candidats qu’ils retiennent dans leur recrutement? [How do employers select candidates in their recruitment process?]. France Travail, www.francetravail.org/statistiques-analyses/entreprises/offres-demploi-et-recrutements/comment-les-employeurs-selection.html?type=article.Google Scholar
Chapron, J.-P., Dubost, C. and Imalhayene, F. (2020). Labels RSE: Accompagner les entreprises et donner confiance à leurs parties prenantes [CSR Labels: Supporting companies and building stakeholder trust]. Ministère de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Relance, www.vie-publique.fr/rapport/278652-labels-rse-accompagner-les-entreprises.Google Scholar
Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés (2023). Le guide du recrutement: Fondamentaux en matière de protection des données personnelles et questions-réponses [The recruitment guide: Fundamentals of personal data protection and Q&A]. www.cnil.fr/fr/le-guide-du-recrutement.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (2001). Green Paper: Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2001:0366:FIN:EN:PDF.Google Scholar
Défenseur des droits (2015). Recruter avec des outils numériques sans discriminer [Recruiting with digital tools without discriminating]. https://juridique.defenseurdesdroits.fr/doc_num.php?explnum_id=18909.Google Scholar
Défenseur des droits (2019). Guide: Pour un recrutement sans discrimination [Guide for non-discriminatory recruitment]. www.defenseurdesdroits.fr/guide-pour-un-recrutement-sans-discrimination-175.Google Scholar
Défenseur des droits (2024). Rapport annuel d’activité 2023 [2023 Annual Activity Report]. www.defenseurdesdroits.fr/rapport-annuel-dactivite-2023-596Google Scholar
Direction de l’Animation de la Recherche, des Études et des Statistiques. (2021). Discrimination à l’embauche selon le sexe: Les enseignements d’un testing de grande ampleur [Gender-based hiring discrimination: Insights from a large-scale test]. https://dares.travail-emploi.gouv.fr/publication/discrimination-lembauche-selon-le-sexe-les-enseignements-dun-testing-de-grande-ampleur.Google Scholar
Djabi-Saïdani, A. and Pérugien, S. (2019). The shaping of diversity management in France: An institutional change analysis. European Management Review, 16(3), 667682. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12343.Google Scholar
Ernst, É. and Honoré-Rougé, Y. (2012). La responsabilité sociétale des entreprises: Une démarche déjà répandue [Corporate social responsibility: An already widespread approach]. Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques, www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/1281346.Google Scholar
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2018). Handbook on European non-discrimination law. https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2018/handbook-european-non-discrimination-law-2018-edition.Google Scholar
Faure, A. and N’Dobo, A. (2012). Double avantage ou double peine? Les effets de l’âge et du sexe des candidats sur les attitudes évaluatives et discursives des évaluateurs en situation de recrutement [Double advantage or double burden? The effects of candidates’ age and gender on evaluative and discursive attitudes of recruiters in recruitment situations]. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 94(2), 285316. https://doi.org/10.3917/cips.094.0285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaudeaux, J.-F. (2004). Aux origines philosophiques, culturelles et historiques des discriminations en France. Réflexions sur un héritage [The philosophical, cultural, and historical origins of discrimination in France: Reflections on an inheritance]. Raison Présente, 152, 1526. https://doi.org/10.3406/raipr.2004.3886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavand, A. (2013). Le recrutement: Enjeux, outils, meilleures pratiques et nouveaux standards [Recruitment: Issues, tools, best practices, and new standards]. Eyrolles.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R. and Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 5880. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grégoire, A., Buigues, C. and Niel, A. (2016). Enjeux du métier de psychologue du travail face à une commande sociale bruyante [Challenges of the profession of work psychologist in the face of a loud social demand]. Le Journal des Psychologues, 340(8), 1422. https://doi.org/10.3917/jdp.340.0014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hangartner, D., Kopp, D. and Siegenthaler, M. (2021). Monitoring hiring discrimination through online recruitment platforms. Nature, 589, 572576. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03136-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, Y., Donnellan, M. B. and Mendoza, A. M. (2019). Five-factor personality domains and job performance: A second order meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 82, 103848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huteau, M. and Lautrey, J. (2006). Les tests d’intelligence [Intelligence tests]. La Découverte.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbert, J. (2014). Les tableaux de bord RH: Construire, mettre en oeuvre et évaluer le système de pilotage [HR Dashboards: Building, Implementing, and Evaluating the Management System]. Eyrolles.Google Scholar
Institut Français d’Opinion Publique (2021). L’Observatoire Meteojob des discriminations à l’embauche [Meteojob Observatory on hiring discrimination]. www.ifop.com/publication/lobservatoire-meteojob-des-discriminations-a-lembauche/.Google Scholar
Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques (2023). France, portrait social: Édition 2023 [France, social portrait: 2023 Edition]. www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/7666953.Google Scholar
Isidro, L. (2020). Emploi de travailleurs maliens sans-papiers dans le bâtiment: Reconnaissance d’une discrimination systémique [Employment of undocumented Malian workers in construction: Recognition of systemic discrimination]. Le Droit Ouvrier, 861(4), 227231. https://doi.org/10.3917/drou.861.0227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kachoukh, F. (2014). Discriminations multiples: Rendre visible l’invisible [Multiple discrimination: Making the invisible visible]. Plein Droit, 103(4), 710. https://doi.org/10.3917/pld.103.0007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laberon, S. and Bruchon-Schweitzer, M. (2009). Les pratiques d’évaluation utilisées dans les structures de conseil en recrutement: Quelques déterminants [The assessment practices of different types of recruitment organizations: Some drivers]. Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 15(2), 111136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1420-2530(16)30178-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, J., Rouhban, O., Tanneau, P., Beauchemin, C., Ichou, M. and Simon, P. (2022). En dix ans, le sentiment de discrimination augmente, porté par les femmes et le motif sexiste [In ten years, the feeling of discrimination has increased, driven by women and the sexist motive]. Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques, www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/6473349.Google Scholar
Lemoine, C. (2023). Évolutions en psychologie du travail et des organisations [Advances in work and organizational psychology]. Le Travail Humain, 86(4), 329344. https://doi.org/10.3917/th.864.0329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levade, A. (2004). Discrimination positive et principe d’égalité en droit français [Affirmative action and the principle of equality in French law]. Pouvoirs, 111(4), 5571. https://doi.org/10.3917/pouv.111.0055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévy-Leboyer, C. (2011). Évaluation du personnel: Quels objectifs? Quelles méthodes? [Personnel assessment: What objectives? What methods?] (7th ed.). Eyrolles.Google Scholar
Lhommeau, B. and Rémy, V. (2022). Les critères de sélection du candidat: Un résumé du processus de recrutement [Candidate selection criteria: A summary of the recruitment process]. Économie et Statistique/Economics and Statistics, 534–535, 6181. https://doi.org/10.24187/ecostat.2022.534.2079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P. (2011). La discrimination multiple, un concept insaisissable par le droit du travail? Un point de vue français et comparatif [Multiple discrimination: An elusive concept in labor law? A French and comparative perspective]. Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé, 63(3), 585608. https://doi.org/10.3406/ridc.2011.20017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myors, B., Lievens, F., Schollaert, E., Van Hoye, G., Cronshaw, S. F., Mladinic, A., Rodriguez, V., Aguinis, H., Steiner, D. D., Rolland, F., Schuler, H., Frintrup, A., Nikolaou, I., Tomprou, M., Subramony, S., Raj, S. B., Tzafrir, S., Bamerger, P., Bertolino, M., … Sackett, P. R. (2008). International perspectives on the legal environment in selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(2), 206246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00040.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papon, S. (2024). Bilan démographique 2023 [2023 demographic report]. Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques, www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/7750004.Google Scholar
Pénicaud, É. and Rémila, N. (2024). 9% des personnes en emploi déclarent avoir subi des traitements inégalitaires ou des discriminations au travail en 2021 [9% of employed individuals report experiencing unequal treatment or discrimination at work in 2021]. Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques, www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/7760309.Google Scholar
Rossier, J. (ed.) (2021). L’évaluation psychologique en contexte multilingue et multiculturel: Questions et enjeux [Psychological assessment in multilingual and multicultural contexts: Questions and issues]. Mardaga.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sackett, P. R., Zhang, C., Berry, C. M. and Lievens, F. (2022). Revisiting meta-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection: Addressing systematic overcorrection for restriction of range. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(11), 20402068. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, F. L. and Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, D. D. and Gilliland, S. W. (1996). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United States. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(2), 134141. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.2.134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilmes, N. (2022). Disability, fairness, and algorithmic bias in AI recruitment. Ethics and Information Technology, 24(21). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09633-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villani, C. (2018). Donner un sens à l’intelligence artificielle: Pour une stratégie nationale et européenne [For a meaningful artificial intelligence: Towards a French and European strategy]. La Documentation française, www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/fr/rapport-de-cedric-villani-donner-un-sens-l-intelligence-artificielle-ia-49194.Google Scholar
Zu, L. (2013). ISO 26000. In Idowu, S. O., Capaldi, N., Zu, L. and Das Gupta, A. (eds.), Encyclopedia of corporate social responsibility (pp. 15071512). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28036-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×