Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 September 2025
With
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cyril of Alexandria: Against JulianIntroduction and Translation, pp. 584 - 613Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Primary Sources
Neumann, Karl Johannes, ed. 1880a. Iuliani Imperatoris Librorum Contra Christianos Quae Supersunt. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Neumann, Karl Johannes 1880b. Kaiser Julians Bücher gegen die Christen. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Wright, Wilmer Cave. 1923. “Against the Galileans.” In The Works of the Emperor Julian, Volume iii. LCL 157. Pages 311–427. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Masaracchia, Emanuela. 1990. Giuliano Imperatore, Contra Galilaeos: Introduzione, testo critico e traduzione. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Nunzio. 2006. “Nuovi frammenti del Contra Galilaeos di Giuliano (dalle omelie di Filagato da Cerami).” BollClass 27: 89–104.Google Scholar
Giavatto, Angelo and Muller, Robert. 2018. Julien l’Empereur: Contre les Galiléens. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. 2023a. “Towards a New Edition of Julian’s Contra Galilaeos: Assessing the Material from the Syriac Transmission of Cyril’s Contra Iulianum.” Classical Quarterly 72: 850–67.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Oecolampadius, J. 1546. “Contra Iulianum apostatam pro religione Christiana libros X.” In Operum divi Cyrilli Alexandrini Episcopi Tomi Quatuor, Volume iii. Cols. 1–253. Basel.Google Scholar
Aubert, Jean. 1638. “Sancti Cyrilli Alexandriae Archiepiscopi Pro sancta Christianorum religione adversus libros athei Iuliani libri X.” In S. P. N. Cyrilli Alexandriae Archiepiscopi operum tomus sextus. Paris: Regiis Typis.Google Scholar
Burguière, Paul and Évieux, Pierre. 1985. Cyrille d’Alexandrie: Contre Julien, Tome i: Livres I et II. SC 322. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile. 2016. Cyrille d’Alexandrie: Contre Julien, Tome ii: Livres III–V. SC 582. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph and Kinzig, Wolfram. 2016. Kyrill von Alexandrien I: Gegen Julian, Teil 1: Buch 1–5. GCS 20. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kaufhold, Hubert. 2017. “Die syrischen Fragmente.” In Kyrill von Alexandrien I: Gegen Julian, Teil 2: Buch 6–10 und Fragmente. GCS 21. Pages 821–95. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kinzig, Wolfram and Brüggemann, Thomas. 2017. Kyrill von Alexandrien I: Gegen Julian, Teil 2: Buch 6–10 und Fragmente. GCS 21. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile. 2021. Cyrille d’Alexandrie: Contre Julien, Tome iv: Livres VIII–IX. SC 624. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Huber-Rebenich, Gerlinde, Rebenich, Stefan, and Schramm, Michael. 2023. Kyrill von Alexandrien. Gegen Julian. Bd. i. Bibliothek der griechischen Literatur 94.1. Stuttgart: Anton Hiersemann.Google Scholar
Ritter, Adolf Martin, Schramm, Michael, and Brüggemann, Thomas. 2023. Kyrill von Alexandrien. Gegen Julian. Bd. ii. Bibliothek der griechischen Literatur 94.2. Stuttgart: Anton Hiersemann.Google Scholar
Bidez, Joseph. 1932. L’empereur Julien: Œuvres complètes, Tome i, 1re partie: Discours de Julien César (I–V). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Bidez, Joseph 1924. L’empereur Julien: Œuvres complètes, Tome i, 2e partie: Lettres et Fragments. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Lacombrade, Christian. 1965. L’empereur Julien: Œuvres complètes, Tome ii, 2e partie: Discours de Julien Empereur (X–XII). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, Heinz-Günther. 2015. Iulianus Augustus: Opera. Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rochefort, Gabriel. 1963. L’empereur Julien: Œuvres complètes, Tome ii, 1re partie: Discours de Julien Empereur (VI–IX). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Wright, Wilmer Cave. 1913–23. The Works of the Emperor Julian. Three volumes. LCL 13, 29, 157. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ahbel-Rappe, Sara. 2010. Damascius’ Problems and Solutions concerning First Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arcari, Luca, ed. 2017. Beyond Conflicts: Cultural and Religious Cohabitations in Alexandria and Egypt between the 1st and the 6th Century ce. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athanassiadi, Polymnia 1993. “Dreams, Theurgy and Freelance Divination: The Testimony of Iamblichus.” JRS 83: 115–30.Google Scholar
Athanassiadi, Polymnia 2009. “Le traitement du mythe: De l’empereur Julien à Proclus.” In Pensée grecque et sagesse d’Orient: Hommage à Michel Tardieu, edited by Amir-Moezzi, M.-A., Dubois, J.-D., Jullien, C., and Jullien, F., 63–76. Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, Lewis. 2004. Nicaea and Its Legacy: An Approach to Fourth-Century Trinitarian Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartelink, Gerard J. M. 1983. “Homer in den Werken des Kyrillos von Alexandrien.” WS NF 17 [96]: 62–68.Google Scholar
Beers, Walter F. 2020. “Bloody Iuvenalia: Hypatia, Pulcheria Augusta, and the Beginnings of Cyril of Alexandria’s Episcopate.” In Hypatia of Alexandria, edited by LaValle Norman, Dawn and Petkas, Alex, 67–86. Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum 119. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Blank, David. 2010. “Ammonius Hermeiou and His School.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, Volume ii, edited by Gerson, Lloyd P., 654–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blummel, Lincoln H. 2014. “Luke 22:43–44: An Anti-Docetic Interpolation or an Apologetic Omission?” TC: A Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism 19: 1–35.Google Scholar
Borst, Arno. 1957–63. Der Turmbau von Babel: Geschichte der Meinungen über Ursprung und Vielfalt der Sprachen und Völker. Four volumes. Stuttgart: Anton Hiersemann Verlag.Google Scholar
Boswell, Brad. 2021. “Goats, Gods, and the Mystery of Christ: Exegesis and Narrative Conflict between Julian and Cyril.” Studia Patristica 129: 51–67.Google Scholar
Boswell, Brad 2022. “Moses the Hellenic Sage: Re-reading Julian’s Against the Galileans.” JECS 30: 245–74.Google Scholar
Boswell, Brad Forthcoming. Emperor Julian, Cyril of Alexandria, and the Narrative Conflict of Traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bouffartigue, Jean. 1992. L’empereur Julien et la culture de son temps. Collection des Études Augustiniennes. Série Antiquité 133. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Bouffartigue, Jean. 2005. “La diversité des nations et la nature des hommes: L’empereur Julien et Cyrille d’Alexandrie dans une controverse incertaine.” In Dieu(x) et hommes: Histoire et iconographie des sociétés païennes et chrétiennes de l’antiquité à nos jours. Mélanges en l’honneur de Françoise Thelamon, edited by S. Crogiez-Pétrequin, 113–26. Rouen: Université de Rouen.Google Scholar
Bouffartigue, Jean 2011. “Porphyre et Julien contre les chrétiens: Intentions, motifs et méthodes de leurs écrits.” In Le traité de Porphyre contre les chrétiens: Un siècle de recherches, nouvelles questions: Actes du colloque international organisé les 8 et 9 septembre 2009 à l’Université de Paris IV-Sorbonne, edited by Morlet, S., 407–26. Série Antiquité 190. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Bouffartigue, Jean and Patillon, Michel, eds. 1977. Porphyry: De l’abstinence. Livre 1, Vol. i. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile. 1994. Le paradoxe trinitaire chez Cyrille d’Alexandrie: Herméneutique, analyses philosophiques et argumentation théologique. Collection des Études Augustiniennes, Série Antiquité 143. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile. 1997. “Platon entre Moïse et Arius selon le Contre Julien de Cyrille d’Alexandrie.” Studia Patristica 32: 264–71.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2003. “The Mystery of the Trinity according to Cyril of Alexandria: The Deployment of the Triad and Its Recapitulation into the Unity of Diversity.” In The Theology of St. Cyril of Alexandria: A Critical Appreciation, edited by Weinandy, Thomas G. and Keating, Daniel A., 75–111. London: T. & T. Clark.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2006. “Le Dieu suprême peut-il entrer en contact avec le monde? Un débat entre païens et chrétiens sur la transcendance divine à partir du Contre Julien de Cyrille d’Alexandrie.” In La transcendance dans la philosophie grecque tardive et dans la pensée chrétienne (Actes du VIe congrès de philosophie grecque, Athènes 22–26 sept 2004), edited by E. Moutsopoulos and G. Lekkas, 177–96. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2008a. “Genèse 2–3: Mythe ou vérité? Un sujet de polémique entre païens et chrétiens dans le Contre Julien de Cyrille d’Alexandrie.” RÉAug 54: 111–33.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2008b. “L’élection d’Israël et la grâce offerte à tous: L’exégèse de Romains 9–11 selon Cyrille d’Alexandrie.” Adamantius 14: 266–85.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2008c. “Dieu peut-il être envieux ou jaloux? Un débat sur les attributs divins entre l’empereur Julien et Cyrille d’Alexandrie.” In Culture classique et christianisme. Mélanges offerts à Jean Bouffartigue, edited by D. Auger and É. Wolff, 13–25. Paris: Picard.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2011a. “1. Cyrille d’Alexandrie, Contre Julien IV, 29–48: L’épisode de Babel et l’origine de la diversité des nations.” AEPHE V 118: 157–61.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2011b. “La diversité des nations et l’élection d’Israël: Y a-t-il une influence du Contre Celse d’Origène sur le Contre les Galiléens de Julien?” In Origeniana decima: Origen as Writer: Papers of the 10th International Origen Congress, edited by Kaczmarek, Sylwia, Pietras, Henryk, and Dziadowiec, Andrzej, 803–30. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2011c. “Un dieu jaloux qui fait des émules: Interprétations patristiques d’Ex 20,5, Nb 25,11 et Dt 32,21.” In Jalousie des dieux, jalousie des hommes: Actes du colloque international organizé à Paris les 28 at 29 novembre 2008, edited by Rouillard-Bonraisin, H., 249–76. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2014. “‘Le Contre les Galiléens de l’empereur Julien répond-il au Contre Celse d’Origène?’” In ΕΝ ΚΑΛΟΙΣ ΚΟΙΝΟΠΡΑΓΙΑ: Hommages à la mémoire de Pierre-Louis Malosse et Jean Bouffartigue, edited by Amato, Eugenio, 103–28. Revue des Études Tardo-antiques, Supplément 3. Nantes: Association Textes pour l’histoire de l’Antiquité tardive.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2017. “Païens et chrétiens en concurrence: l’instrumentalisation de la philosophie dans les controverses d’Origène contre Celse et de Cyrille d’Alexandrie contre Julien.” In Philosophia in der Konkurrenz von Schulen, Wissenschaften und Religionen: Zur Pluralisierung des Philosophiebegriffs in Kaiserzeit und Spätantike, edited by Christoph Riedweg, 217–55. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2020b. “Le livre VIII du Contre Julien de Cyrille d’Alexandrie: Éléments pour la datation, le plan et la méthode de réfutation.” In Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert: Julian “Contra Galilaeos” – Kyrill “Contra Iulianum,” edited by Huber-Rebenich, Gerlinde and Rebenich, Stefan, 165–94. TU 181. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2020c. “Le prologue de l’évangile de Jean au coeur de la polémique entre l’empereur Julien et Cyrille d’Alexandrie.” In Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert: Julian “Contra Galilaeos” – Kyrill “Contra Iulianum,” edited by Huber-Rebenich, Gerlinde and Rebenich, Stefan, 195–227. TU 181. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2020d. “Le rôle de l’exégèse pour la formation du dogme chrétien dans la polémique antijuive: Le cas de la théophanie de Mambré (Gn 18).” In Exégèse, revelation et formation des dogmes dans l’antiquité tardive, edited by Santoprete, Luciana Gabriela Soares, Le Boulluec, Alain, and Timotin, Andrei, 241–67. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2021. “The Biblical Text and Its Variants at the Heart of the Debate between the Emperor Julian and Cyril of Alexandria: The Cases of Genesis 6,2 and 49,10.” ZAC 25: 284–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boys-Stones, George. 2018. Platonist Philosophy 80 bc to ad 250: An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bradbury, Scott. 2020. “Julian and the Jews.” In A Companion to Julian the Apostate, edited by Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich and Rebenich, Stefan, 267–92. Brill’s Companions to the Byzantine World 5. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bregman, Jay. 1982. Synesius of Cyrene: Philosopher-Bishop. The Transformation of the Classical Heritage 2. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisson, L. 1987. “Amélius, son œuvre, sa doctrine, son style.” ANRW 2, 36.2: 793–860.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. 2013. “Clement and Cyril of Alexandria: Confronting Platonism with Christianity.” St. Patr. 58, 6: 19–44.Google Scholar
Brüggemann, Thomas. 2020. “Ἀποστροφή in Contra Iulianum: Julian als fiktives Gegenüber Kyrills.” In Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert: Julian “Contra Galilaeos” – Kyrill “Contra Iulianum,” edited by Huber-Rebenich, Gerlinde and Rebenich, Stefan, 153–64. TU 181. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cameron, Alan and Long, Jacqueline. 1993. Barbarians and Politics at the Court of Arcadius. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil. 2014. Dialoguing in Late Antiquity. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies, Trustees for Harvard University.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil and Gaul, Niels, eds. 2017. Dialogues and Debates from Late Antiquity to Late Byzantium. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champion, Michael W. 2014. Explaining the Cosmos: Creation and Cultural Interaction in Late-Antique Gaza. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chantraine, P. 1954. “Le divin et les dieux chez Homère.” In La notion du divin depuis Homère jusqu’ à Platon, 47–79. Vandoeuvres-Geneva: Fondation Hardt.Google Scholar
Chronz, M. and Kinzig, Wolfram. 2004. “Beobachtungen zur Bucheinteilung und zum ursprünglichen Umfang von Kyrills Contra Iulianum sowie Julians Contra Galilaeos.” In “ … zur Zeit oder Unzeit” Studien zur spätantiken Theologie-, Geistes- und Kunstgeschichte und ihrer Nachwirkung, edited by Ritter, A. M., Wischmeyer, W., and Kinzig, Wolfram, 29–62. Mandelbachtal: Edition Cicero.Google Scholar
Clark, Gillian. 2000a. “Philosophic Lives and the Philosophic Life: Porphyry and Iamblichus.” In Greek Biography and Panegyric in Late Antiquity, edited by Hägg, Tomas and Rousseau, Philip, 29–51. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Gillian 2000b. Porphyry of Tyre: On Abstinence from Killing Animals. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, Kathleen. 1990. “Fatal Charades: Roman Executions Staged as Mythological Enactments.” JRS 80: 44–73.Google Scholar
Collette, Bernard. 2021. The Stoic Doctrine of Providence: A Study of Its Development and of Some of Its Major Issues. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, John Granger. 2000. The Interpretation of the New Testament in Greco-Roman Paganism. Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum 3. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Cook, John Granger 2004. The Interpretation of the Old Testament in Greco-Roman Paganism. Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum 23. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Cook, John Granger 2016. “Julian and Porphyry on the Resurrection of Jesus in the Gospels.” The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 10: 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. 2013. “Scripture as ‘One Book’: Origen, Jerome, and Cyril of Alexandria on Isaiah 29:11.” JThS 64: 137–53.Google Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. 2014. Cyril of Alexandria’s Trinitarian Theology of Scripture. Oxford Early Christian Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. 2020a. “Reconsidering the Relationship between (Pseudo-)Didymus’s De Trinitate and Cyril of Alexandria’s Contra Julianum.” JThS 71: 236–57.Google Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. 2020b. “The Influence of Eusebius’ Chronicle on the Apologetic Treatises of Cyril of Alexandria and Augustine of Hippo.” JEH 71: 693–711.Google Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. 2020c. “Cyril of Alexandria’s Contra Iulianum, Imperial Politics, and Alexandrian Philosophy (c. 416–428).” In Eastern Christianity and Late Antique Philosophy, edited by Anagnostou-Laoutides, Eva and Parry, Ken, 110–32. Texts and Studies in Eastern Christianity 18. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. 2023a. “Towards a New Edition of Julian’s Contra Galilaeos: Assessing the Material from the Syriac Transmission of Cyril’s Contra Iulianum.” Classical Quarterly 72: 850–67.Google Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. 2023b. “Cyril of Alexandria’s Renunciation of Religious Violence.” Church History 92: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. 2024. “The Emperor Julian and Cyril of Alexandria on Human Nature, Ethnicity, and Moral Progress.” ETL 100: 73–102.Google Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. 2025. “Defending the Glory of God: Cyril of Alexandria’s Political Theology at the Court of Theodosius II.” In Christian Political Cultures in Late Antiquity, edited by Flower, Richard, McEvoy, Meaghan, and Whelan, Robin. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. Forthcoming. “The Value of Human Life: Christology and Human Flourishing according to Cyril of Alexandria.” In Creation, Christology, and Human Flourishing, edited by Michael W. Champion and Matthew R. Crawford. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
De Labriolle, Pierre. 1934. La réaction païenne: Étude sur la polémique antichrétienne du Ier au VIe siècle. Paris: L’Artisan du Livre.Google Scholar
De Vita, Maria Carmen. 2020. “Callidior ceteris persecutor (Rufin. hist. 10,33): Giuliano e la questione Ariana.” In Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert: Julian “Contra Galilaeos” – Kyrill “Contra Iulianum,” edited by Huber-Rebenich, Gerlinde and Rebenich, Stefan, 39–63. TU 181. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, Jitse and Raschle, Christian R., eds. 2020. Religious Violence in the Ancient World: From Classical Athens to Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, John. 2009. “St. John in Amelius’ Seminar.” In Late Antique Epistemology: Other Ways to Truth, edited by Vassilopoulou, Panayiota and Clark, Stephen R. L., 30–43. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, J., Russell, D., and Gertz, S., trans. 2012. Aeneas of Gaza, Theophrastus. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. 1972. “Une exégèse neoplatonicienne du prologue de l’Évangile selon saint Jean.” In Épektasis: Mélanges patristiques offerts au cardinal Jean Daniélou, edited by Fontaine, Jacques and Kannengieser, Charles, 75–87. Paris: Beauchesne.Google Scholar
Dragona-Monachou, Myrto. 1994. “Divine Providence in the Philosophy of the Empire.” In ANRW 2, 36.7: 4417–90.Google Scholar
Drijvers, Jan Willem. 1992. Helena Augusta: The Mother of Constantine the Great and the Legend of Her Finding of the True Cross. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droge, Arthur J. 1989. Homer or Moses? Early Christian Interpretations of the History of Culture. Hermeneutische Untersuchungen zur Theologie 26. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Edwards, Mark. 2006. Culture and Philosophy in the Age of Plotinus. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Edwards, Mark 2015. Religions of the Constantinian Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elm, Susanna. 2012. Sons of Hellenism, Fathers of the Church: Emperor Julian, Gregory of Nazianzus, and the Vision of Rome. Transformation of the Classical Heritage 49. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Elm, Susanna 2017. “The Old Man from Tyre: Julian’s Contra Galilaeos and the Fourth-Century Nachleben of Porphyry’s Engagement with Christians.” In Die Christen als Bedrohung? Text, Kontext und Wirkung von Porphyrios’ Contra Christianos, edited by Männlein-Robert, Irmgard, 307–23. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Eubank, Nathan. 2010. “A Disconcerting Prayer: On the Originality of Luke 23:34a.” JBL 129: 521–36.Google Scholar
Fairbairn, Donald. 2003. Grace and Christology in the Early Church. Oxford Early Christian Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finamore, John F. 1988. “ΘΕΟΙ ΘΕΩΝ: An Iamblichean Doctrine in Julian’s Against the Galilaeans.” TAPhA 118: 393–401.Google Scholar
Finamore, John F. and Iles Johnston, Sarah. 2010. “The Chaldaean Oracles.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, Volume i, edited by Gerson, Lloyd P., 161–73. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Ari. 2018. The Specter of the Jews: Emperor Julian and the Rhetoric of Ethnicity in Syrian Antioch. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fowden, Garth. 1986. The Egyptian Hermes: A Historical Approach to the Late Pagan Mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Früchtel, L. 1937. “Neue Textzeugnisse zu Clemens Alexandrinus.” ZNTW 36, 1: 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaddis, M. 2005. There Is No Crime for Those Who Have Christ. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, Simon, ed. 2008. The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goulet, Richard. 2000. “Horapollon.” In Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, Volume iii, 804–06.Google Scholar
Goulet, Richard 2003. Macarios de Magnésie: Le Monogénès. Tome i: Introduction générale. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Goulet, Richard 2004. “Hypothèses récentes sur le traité de Porphyre Contre les chrétiens.” In Hellénisme et Christianisme, edited by Narcy, Michel and Rebillard, Éric, 61–109. Villeneuve-d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Goulet, Richard 2005. “Le titre de l’ouvrage.” In Porphyre. Sentences, Volume i, edited by Brisson, Luc, 11–16. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Grant, Robert M. 1964. “Greek Literature in the Treatise De Trinitate and Cyril Contra Julianum.” JThS 15: 265–79.Google Scholar
Greatrex, Geoffrey. 2018. “Zacharias Rhetor of Mytilene.” Oxford Dictionary of Late Antiquity, Volume ii, edited by Nicholson, Oliver, 1605–07. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenwood, David Neal. 2021. Julian and Christianity: Revisiting the Constantinian Revolution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Greer, Rowan and Mitchell, Margaret, eds. 2007. The “Belly-Myther” of Endor: Interpretations of I Kingdoms 28 in the Early Church. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Griffith, Sydney. 1987. “Ephrem the Syrian’s Hymns ‘Against Julian’: Meditations on History and Imperial Power.” Vig.Christ. 41: 238–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, J. G. 1948. “Human Sacrifices in Egypt: The Classical Evidence.” ASAE 48: 409–23.Google Scholar
Guida, Augusto. 1996. “Altre testimonianze e un nuovo frammento del ‘Contro i Galilei’ di Giuliano Imperatore.” In Hodoi dizēsios: Le vie della ricerca: Studi in onore di Francesco Adorno, edited by Funghi, M. Serena, 241–52. Florence: L. S. Olschki.Google Scholar
Guida, Augusto 2020. “La trasmissione del testo del Contra Galilaeos di Giuliano e un nuovo misterioso frammento.” In Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert: Julian “Contra Galilaeos” – Kyrill “Contra Iulianum,” edited by Huber-Rebenich, Gerlinde and Rebenich, Stefan, 91–109. TU 181. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Guinot, Jean-Noël. 1988. “L’exégèse du bouc émissaire chez Cyrille d’Alexandrie et Théodoret de Cyr.” Augustinianum 28: 603–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Christopher. 1997. Alexandria in Late Antiquity: Topography and Social Conflict. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hahn, Johannes. 2004. Gewalt und religiöser Konflikt: Studien zu den Auseinandersetzungen zwischen Christen, Heiden und Juden im Osten des Römischen Reiches (von Konstantin bis Theodosius II). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammerstaedt, J. 1996. “Die Vergöttlichung unwürdiger Menschen bei den Heiden als apologetisches Argument in Schriften des Sokrates, Theodoret, Cyrill von Alexandrien und Johannes Chrysostomos.” JbAC 39: 76–101.Google Scholar
Hanson, R. P. C. 1988. The Search for the Christian Doctrine of God: The Arian Controversy 318–381. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.Google Scholar
Hardy, E. R. 1982. “The Further Education of Cyril of Alexandria (412–444): Questions and Problems.” Studia Patristica 17, 1: 116–22.Google Scholar
Harries, Jill. 2012. “Julian the Lawgiver.” In Emperor and Author: The Writings of Julian the Apostate, edited by Baker-Brian, Nicholas and Tougher, Shaun, 121–36. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Harvey, Susan Ashbrook. 2006. Scenting Salvation: Ancient Christianity and the Olfactory Imagination. Transformation of the Classical Heritage 42. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Heubeck, A., West, S., and Hainsworth, J. G.. 1988. A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey. Three volumes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hintze, F. and Morenz, S.. 1954. “Ein Streitgespräch Kyrills.” Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde 79: 125–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d’Hoine, Pieter and Martijn, Marije. 2017. All from One: A Guide to Proclus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Philippe. 1994. “Damascius.” Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, Volume ii, 541–93.Google Scholar
Hombert, Pierre-Marie. 2023. “Le De Trinitate attribué à Didyme d’Alexandrie: Un nouveau status quaestionis.” Revue d’études augustiniennes et patristiques 69: 3–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Horst, Pieter W. 1993. “‘Thou Shalt Not Revile the Gods’: The LXX Translation of Exodus 22:28 (27), Its Background and Influence.” Studia Philonica 5: 1–8.Google Scholar
Huber-Rebenich, Gerlinde and Rebenich, Stefan, eds. 2020. Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert: Julian “Contra Galilaeos” – Kyrill “Contra Iulianum.” TU 181. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Huffman, Carl. 2012. “Aristoxenus’ Life of Socrates.” In Aristoxenus of Tarentum, edited by Huffman, Carl, 251–82. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
Hunt, David. 2012. “The Christian Context of Julian’s Against the Galileans.” In Emperor and Author: The Writings of Julian the Apostate, edited by Baker-Brian, Nicholas and Tougher, Shaun, 251–61. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2006a. Ethnicity and Argument in Eusebius’ Praeparatio Evangelica. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2006b. “Eusebius’ Praeparatio Evangelica as Literary Experiment.” In Greek Literature in Late Antiquity: Dynamism, Didacticism, Classicism, edited by Johnson, Scott F., 67–89. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2010. “Rethinking the Authenticity of Porphyry, contra Christianos, fr. 1.” Studia Patristica 46: 53–58.Google Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2012a. “Hellenism and Its Discontents.” In The Oxford Handbook of Late Antiquity, edited by Johnson, Scott F., 437–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2012b. “Philosophy, Hellenicity, Law: Porphyry on Origen, Again.” JHS 132: 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2013. Religion and Identity in Porphyry of Tyre: The Limits of Hellenism in Late Antiquity. Greek Culture in the Roman World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2015. “Astrology and the Will in Porphyry of Tyre.” In Causation and Creation in Classical and Late Antiquity, 186–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2017. “Early Christianity and the Classical Tradition.” In The Oxford Handbook to the Second Sophistic, edited by Richter, Daniel S. and Johnson, William A., 625–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2019. “The Fifth-Century Transformation of Apologetics in Cyril and Theodoret.” In The Fifth Century: Age of Transformation, edited by Drijvers, Jan Willem and Lenski, Noel, 247–59. Munera: Studi storici sulla Tarda Antichità 46. Bari: Edipuglia.Google Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2020. “Words at War: Textual Violence in Eusebius.” In The Violence of Small Worlds: Conflict and Social Control in Late Antiquity, edited by Cooper, Kate and Wood, Jamie, 213–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2021. “Philosophy in Eusebius and Marcellus.” In The Routledge Handbook of Early Christian Philosophy, edited by Edwards, Mark, 450–60. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. Forthcoming. “Cyril of Alexandria as a Reader of Plato.” In Platonic Principles: Studies in Honor of Lloyd Gerson, edited by Lauritzen, Frederick and Wear, Sarah Klitenic. Steubenville, OH: Franciscan University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, A. H. M., Martindale, J. R., and Morris, J.. 1971. The Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire. Three volumes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaldellis, Anthony. 2005. “Julian, the Hierophant of Eleusis, and the Abolition of Constantius’ Tyranny.” CQ 55: 652–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufhold, Hubert. 2020. “Werke des Kyrill in syrischer Überlieferung.” In Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert: Julian “Contra Galilaeos” – Kyrill “Contra Iulianum,” edited by Huber-Rebenich, Gerlinde and Rebenich, Stefan, 229–55. TU 181. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kinzig, Wolfram. 2020. “Structure and Sitz im Leben of Cyril of Alexandria’s Contra Iulianum.” In Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert: Julian “Contra Galilaeos” – Kyrill “Contra Iulianum,” edited by Huber-Rebenich, Gerlinde and Rebenich, Stefan, 111–29. TU 181. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kinzig, Wolfram and Brüggemann, Thomas. 2006. “Towards a Better Understanding of Cyril of Alexandria’s Against Julian: The Manuscripts Used by Jean Aubert in His Edition of 1638.” Studia Patristica 40: 267–74.Google Scholar
LaValle Norman, Dawn and Petkas, Alex, eds. 2020. Hypatia of Alexandria: Her Context and Legacy. Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum 119. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenski, N. 2002. Failure of Empire: Valens and the Roman State in the Fourth Century ad. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Levenson, David B. 2004. “The Ancient and Medieval Sources for the Emperor Julian’s Attempt to Rebuild the Jerusalem Temple.” JSJ 35: 409–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liébaert, Jacques. 1951. La doctrine christologique de saint Cyrille d’Alexandrie avant la querelle nestorienne. Lille: Facultés Catholiques.Google Scholar
Liebeschuetz, J. H. W. G. 2012. “Julian’s Hymn to the Mother of the Gods: The Revival and Justification of Traditional Religion.” In Emperor and Author: The Writings of Julian the Apostate, edited by Baker-Brian, Nicholas and Tougher, Shaun, 213–27. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Magree, Michael C. 2024. The Interpretation of Kenosis from Origen to Cyril of Alexandria: Dimensions of Self-Emptying in the Reception of Philippians 2:7. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malley, William J. 1978. Hellenism and Christianity: The Conflict between Hellenic and Christian Wisdom in the “Contra Galilaeos” of Julian the Apostate and the “Contra Julianum” of St. Cyril of Alexandria. Analecta Gregoriana 210. Rome: Università Gregoriana.Google Scholar
Männlein-Robert, I. 2013. “Tugend, Flucht und Ekstase: Zur ὁμοίωσις θεῷ in der Kaiserzeit und Spätantike.” In Ethik des antiken Platonismus: Der platonische Weg zum Glück in Systematik, Entstehung und historischem Kontext, edited by Ch. Pietsch, 99–111. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Marcone, Arnaldo. 2019. “Il Contro i Galilei di Giuliano edito da Voltaire. Storia – e paradossi – di un pamphlet di polemica religiosa.” In PHILOBIBLOS: Scritti in onore di Giovanni Geraci, edited by Bencivenni, A. et al., 545–66. Milan: Jouvence.Google Scholar
Marcone, Arnaldo 2020. “Pagan Reactions to Julian.” In A Companion to Julian the Apostate, edited by Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich and Rebenich, Stefan, 326–59. Brill’s Companions to the Byzantine World 5. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Mason, Hugh. 1974. Greek Terms for Roman Institutions. American Studies in Papyrology 13. Toronto: Hakkert.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Judith. 2007. The Architecture of Alexandria and Egypt c. 300 bc to ad 700. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Meijering, E. P. 1975. “Cyril of Alexandria on the Platonists and the Trinity.” In God, Being, History: Studies in Patristic Philosophy, 114–27. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Millar, Fergus. 2006. A Greek Roman Empire: Power and Belief under Theodosius II (408–450). Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Margaret M. 2022. “‘Snacking on Greek Learning’: Julian and Cyril in Scriptural σύγκρισις.” Paper delivered at the North American Patristics Society annual meeting.Google Scholar
Morlet, S. 2008. “Un nouveau témoignage sur le Contra Christianos de Porphyre?” Semitica et Classica 1: 149–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morlet, S. 2009. La Démonstration Évangélique d’Eusèbe de Césarée: Étude sur l’apologétique chrétienne à l’époque de Constantin. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Morlet, S. 2011a. “Pourquoi Dieu a-t-il interdit la connaissance du bien et du mal? La critique porphyrienne de Gn 2, 17: Le problème de ses sources et de sa postérité.” Semitica et Classica 4: 125–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morlet, S. 2011b. “Eusebius’ Polemic against Porphyry: A Reassessment.” In Reconsidering Eusebius, edited by Inowlocki, Sabrina and Zamagni, Claudio, 119–50. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 107. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, Heinz-Günther. 2001. “Kaiserlicher Held und Christenfeind: Julian Apostata im Urteil des späteren 4. und des 5. Jh.s n. Chr.” In Die Welt des Sokrates von Konstantinopel, edited by Bäbler, B. and Nesselrath, H.-G., 15–43. Munich; Leipzig: K. G. Saur.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, Heinz-Günther 2020a. “Julian’s Philosophical Writings.” In A Companion to Julian the Apostate, edited by Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich and Rebenich, Stefan, 38–63. Brill’s Companions to the Byzantine World 5. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesselrath, Heinz-Günther 2020b. “Von götterlosen Galiläern und grotesken Gräberkulten.” In Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert: Julian “Contra Galilaeos” – Kyrill “Contra Iulianum,” edited by Huber-Rebenich, Gerlinde and Rebenich, Stefan, 1–14. TU 181. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Niccolai, Lea. 2023. Christianity, Philosophy, and Roman Power: Constantine, Julian, and the Bishops on Exegesis and Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nünlist, René. 2009. The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2018. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton Classics. Princeton Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Paget, James Carleton and Gathercole, Simon, eds. 2021. Celsus in His World: Philosophy, Polemic and Religion in the Second Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadogiannakis, Yannis. 2012. Christianity and Hellenism in the Fifth-Century Greek East: Theodoret’s Apologetics against the Greeks in Context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Perrone, L. 1994. “Echi della polemica pagana sulla Bibbia negli scritti esegetici fra IV e V secolo: Le ‘Quaestiones Veteris et Novi Testamenti’ dell’ Ambrosiaster.” AnnSE 11: 161–85.Google Scholar
Pietsch, Thomas. 2023. “St Cyril of Alexandria and the Mysteries of Isis in De Adoratione.” JEH 74: 703–19.Google Scholar
Pilhofer, Peter. 1990. Presbyteron kreitton: Der Altersbeweis der jüdischen und christlichen Apologeten und seine Vorgeschichte. WUNT 39. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Rebenich, Stefan. 2020. “Julian’s Afterlife: The Reception of a Roman Emperor.” In A Companion to Julian the Apostate, edited by Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich and Rebenich, Stefan, 398–420. Brill’s Companions to the Byzantine World 5. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebenich, Stefan 2021. “‘History in Cyril’: Das historische Argument in der Schrift Contra Iulianum des Patriarchen Kyrill von Alexandrien.” In Ecclesia victrix? Zum Verhältnis von Staat und Kirche in der Spätantike: Festschrift für Klaus Martin Girardet, edited by Aydin, Karen, van Hoof, Christine, and Mathieu, Lukas, 169–85. Berlin: LIT.Google Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph. 1994. Ps-Justin (Markell von Ankyra?), Ad Graecos de vera religione (bisher “Cohortatio ad Graecos”): Einleitung und Kommentar. 2 vols. Schweizerische Beiträge zur Altertumswissenschaft 25. Basel: F. Reinhardt.Google Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph 1999. “With Stoicism and Platonism against the Christians: Structures of Philosophical Argumentation in Julian’s Contra Galilaeos.” Hermathena 166: 63–91.Google Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph 2000. “Zur handschriftlichen Überlieferung der Apologie Kyrills von Alexandrien Contra Iulianum.” Museum Helveticum 57: 151–65.Google Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph 2005. “Mythos mit geheimem Sinn oder reine Blasphemie? Julian über die mosaische Erzählung vom Sündenfall (Contra Galilaeos fr. 17,10–12 Masaracchia).” In κορυφαίῳ ἀνδρί: Mélanges offerts à André Hurst, edited by Kolde, A., Lukinovich, A., and Rey, A.-L., 367–75. Recherches et rencontres 22. Geneva: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph 2008a. “Das Verbot, vom Baum der Erkenntnis von Gut und Böse zu essen (Gen 2, 17): Zeichen eines missgünstigen Gottes? Kaiser Julian und Kyrill von Alexandrien in einer virtuellen Debatte.” In Beyond Eden: The Biblical Story of Paradise (Genesis 2–3) and Its Reception History, edited by Schmid, K. and Riedweg, Christoph, 187–208. Tübingen: Mohr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph 2008b. “Julians Exegese der Rede des Demiurgen an die versammelten Götter in Platons Timaios 41a–d.” In Culture classique et christianisme: Mélanges offerts à Jean Bouffartigue, edited by Auger, Danièle and Wolff, Étienne, 83–95. Paris: Picard.Google Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph 2011. “Alexander of Aphrodisias, De Prouidentia: Greek Fragments and Arabic Versions.” In Culture in Pieces: Essays on Ancient Texts in Honour of Peter Parsons, edited by Obbink, Dirk and Rutherford, Richard, 277–301. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph 2012. “Exegese als Kampfmittel in der Auseinandersetzung zwischen Heiden und Christen: Zum ‘Sündenbock’ von Lev 16 bei Julian und Kyrill von Alexandrien.” ZAC 16, 3: 439–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph 2020a. “A German Renaissance Humanist as Predecessors and Some Further Surprises.” In Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert: Julian “Contra Galilaeos” – Kyrill “Contra Iulianum,” edited by Huber-Rebenich, Gerlinde and Rebenich, Stefan, 257–85. TU 181. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph 2020b. “Anti-Christian Polemics and Pagan Onto-Theology: Julian’s Against the Galilaeans.” In A Companion to Julian the Apostate, edited by Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich and Rebenich, Stefan, 244–66. Brill’s Companions to the Byzantine World 5. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph and Oesterheld, Christian. 1998. “Scritto e controscritto: Per una nuova edizione di Cirillo Alessandrino Contra Iulianum.” In Giuliano Imperatore: Le sue idee, i suoi amici, i suoi avversari. Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studi, Lecce, 10–12 Dicembre 1998. Rudiae (Ricerche sul mondo classico) 10: 415–33.Google Scholar
Rigolio, Alberto. 2019. Christians in Conversation: A Guide to Late Antique Dialogues in Greek and Syriac. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, Adolf Martin. 2020. “Theologische Kontroversen innerhalb der römischen Reichskirche und ihre Widerspiegelung in der Christenpolemik Kaiser Julians.” In Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert: Julian “Contra Galilaeos” – Kyrill “Contra Iulianum,” edited by Huber-Rebenich, Gerlinde and Rebenich, Stefan, 15–38. TU 181. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Runia, David T. 1997. “The Text of the Platonic Citations in Philo of Alexandria.” In Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition: Essays Presented to John Whittaker, edited by Joyal, M., 261–92. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Runia, David T. 2023. “The Aëtian Placita and the Church Fathers: Creative Use of a Distinctive Mode of Ordering Knowledge.” In The Intellectual World of Late Antique Christianity: Reshaping Classical Traditions, edited by Ayres, Lewis, Champion, Michael, and Crawford, Matthew R., 198–220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Norman. 2000. Cyril of Alexandria. The Early Church Fathers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Russell, Norman 2007. “The Church in the Commentaries of St. Cyril of Alexandria.” International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church 7: 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandwell, Isabella. 2005. “Outlawing ‘Magic’ or Outlawing ‘Religion’? Libanius and the Theodosian Code as Evidence for Legislation against ‘Pagan’ Practices.” In The Spread of Christianity in the First Four Centuries, edited by Harris, W. V., 87–123. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schibli, Hermann S. 2002. Hierocles of Alexandria. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Hofner, Sebastian. 2020. “Reform, Routine, and Propaganda: Julian the Lawgiver.” In A Companion to Julian the Apostate, edited by Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich and Rebenich, Stefan, 124–71. Brill’s Companions to the Byzantine World 5. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Schrader, Hermann. 1888. “Zu den Fragmenten des Φιλόσοφος Ἱστορία des Porphyrios bei Cyrill von Alexandria.” AGPh 1, 3: 359–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schramm, Michael. 2017. “Platonikerzitate in Kyrill von Alexandrias Contra Iulianum.” Mus.Helv. 74: 66–85.Google Scholar
Sferlea, Gheorghe Ovidiu. 2016. “Le titre Theotokos dans les débats christologiques du IVe siècle.” Laval théologique et philosophique 72: 491–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddals, Ruth M. 1987. “Logic and Christology in Cyril of Alexandria.” JThS 38: 341–67.Google Scholar
Smith, Rowland. 1995. Julian’s Gods: Religion and Philosophy in the Thought and Action of Julian the Apostate. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Speller, Lydia Agnew. 1983. “New Light on the Photinians: The Evidence of Ambrosiaster.” JThS 34: 99–113.Google Scholar
Steel, Carlos. 2010. “Proclus.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, Volume ii, edited by Gerson, Lloyd P., 630–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stöcklin-Kaldewey, Sara. 2014. Kaiser Julians Gottesverehrung im Kontext der Spätantike. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaseanu-Döbler, Ilinca. 2013. Theurgy in Late Antiquity: The Invention of a Ritual Tradition. Beiträge zur Europäischen Religionsgeschichte 1. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres, Juana. 2009. “Emperor Julian and the Veneration of Relics.” AntTard 17: 205–14.Google Scholar
Trombley, F. 2001. Hellenic Religion and Christianization: C. 370–529. Two volumes. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Trovato, Stefano. 2012. “Un nuovo frammento e nuove testimonianze del ‘Contra Galilaeos’ di Giuliano l’Apostata.” JöByz 62: 265–79.Google Scholar
Vaccari, A. 1937. “La grecità di S. Cirillo d’Alessandria.” In Studi dedicati alla memoria di P. Ubaldi, edited by Gemelli, A., 27–39. Milan: Società Editrice “Vita e Pensiero.”Google Scholar
van Loon, Hans. 2009. The Dyophysite Christology of Cyril of Alexandria. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 96. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Riel, Gerd. 2010. “Damascius.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, Volume ii, edited by Gerson, Lloyd P., 667–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Villani, Barbara. 2022. “Creation of the Universe and Creation of Man in Cyril of Alexandria’s Early Works on the Pentateuch.” ZAC 26: 145–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viltanioti, Irini-Fotini and Marmodoro, Anna, eds. 2017. Divine Powers in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vinzent, Markus. 2000. “‘Oxbridge’ in der ausgehenden Spätantike, oder: Ein Vergleich der Schulen von Athen und Alexandrien.” ZAC 4: 49–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinzent, Markus 2001. “Halbe Heiden – Doppelte Christen: Die Festbriefe Kyrills von Alexandrien und die Datierung seines Werkes Contra Iulianum.” In Christen und Nichtchristen in Spätantike, Neuzeit und Gegenwart: Beginn und Ende des Konstantinischen Zeitalters, edited by Dörfler-Dierken, Angelika, Kinzig, Wolfram, and Vinzent, Markus, 41–60. Mandelbachtal: Edition Cicero.Google Scholar
Vössing, Konrad. 2020. “The Value of a Good Education: The School Law in Context.” In A Companion to Julian the Apostate, edited by Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich and Rebenich, Stefan, 172–206. Brill’s Companions to the Byzantine World 5. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Edwards J. 2006. City and School in Late Antique Athens and Alexandria. Transformation of the Classical Heritage 41. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Watts, Edwards J. 2010. Riot in Alexandria: Tradition and Group Dynamics in Late Antique Pagan and Christian Communities. The Transformation of the Classical Heritage 46. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Edwards J. 2017. Hypatia: The Life and Legend of an Ancient Philosopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Westerfeld, Jennifer Taylor. 2019. Egyptian Hieroglyphs in the Late Antique Imagination. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich. 2020. “Revival and Reform: The Religious Policy of Julian.” In A Companion to Julian the Apostate, edited by Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich and Rebenich, Stefan, 207–44. Brill’s Companions to the Byzantine World 5. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich and Rebenich, Stefan, eds. 2020. A Companion to Julian the Apostate. Brill’s Companions to the Byzantine World 5. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilken, Robert L. 1999. “Cyril of Alexandria’s Contra Iulianum.” In The Limits of Ancient Christianity: Essays on Late Antique Thought and Culture in Honor of R. A. Markus, edited by Klingshirn, William E. and Vessey, Mark, 42–55. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Woodbury, L. 1973. “Socrates and the Daughter of Aristides.” Phoenix 27: 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaganas, Dimitrios. 2019. La formation d’une exégèse alexandrine post-origénienne: Les Commentaires sur les Douze Prophètes et sur Isaïe de Cyrille d’Alexandrie. Traditio Exegetica Graeca 17. Leuven: Peeters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeegers-Vander Vorst, N. 1972. Les citations des poètes grecs chez les apologistes chrétiens du IIe siècle. Louvain: Publications Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Ahbel-Rappe, Sara. 2010. Damascius’ Problems and Solutions concerning First Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arcari, Luca, ed. 2017. Beyond Conflicts: Cultural and Religious Cohabitations in Alexandria and Egypt between the 1st and the 6th Century ce. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athanassiadi, Polymnia 1993. “Dreams, Theurgy and Freelance Divination: The Testimony of Iamblichus.” JRS 83: 115–30.Google Scholar
Athanassiadi, Polymnia 2009. “Le traitement du mythe: De l’empereur Julien à Proclus.” In Pensée grecque et sagesse d’Orient: Hommage à Michel Tardieu, edited by Amir-Moezzi, M.-A., Dubois, J.-D., Jullien, C., and Jullien, F., 63–76. Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, Lewis. 2004. Nicaea and Its Legacy: An Approach to Fourth-Century Trinitarian Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartelink, Gerard J. M. 1983. “Homer in den Werken des Kyrillos von Alexandrien.” WS NF 17 [96]: 62–68.Google Scholar
Beers, Walter F. 2020. “Bloody Iuvenalia: Hypatia, Pulcheria Augusta, and the Beginnings of Cyril of Alexandria’s Episcopate.” In Hypatia of Alexandria, edited by LaValle Norman, Dawn and Petkas, Alex, 67–86. Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum 119. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Blank, David. 2010. “Ammonius Hermeiou and His School.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, Volume ii, edited by Gerson, Lloyd P., 654–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blummel, Lincoln H. 2014. “Luke 22:43–44: An Anti-Docetic Interpolation or an Apologetic Omission?” TC: A Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism 19: 1–35.Google Scholar
Borst, Arno. 1957–63. Der Turmbau von Babel: Geschichte der Meinungen über Ursprung und Vielfalt der Sprachen und Völker. Four volumes. Stuttgart: Anton Hiersemann Verlag.Google Scholar
Boswell, Brad. 2021. “Goats, Gods, and the Mystery of Christ: Exegesis and Narrative Conflict between Julian and Cyril.” Studia Patristica 129: 51–67.Google Scholar
Boswell, Brad 2022. “Moses the Hellenic Sage: Re-reading Julian’s Against the Galileans.” JECS 30: 245–74.Google Scholar
Boswell, Brad Forthcoming. Emperor Julian, Cyril of Alexandria, and the Narrative Conflict of Traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bouffartigue, Jean. 1992. L’empereur Julien et la culture de son temps. Collection des Études Augustiniennes. Série Antiquité 133. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Bouffartigue, Jean. 2005. “La diversité des nations et la nature des hommes: L’empereur Julien et Cyrille d’Alexandrie dans une controverse incertaine.” In Dieu(x) et hommes: Histoire et iconographie des sociétés païennes et chrétiennes de l’antiquité à nos jours. Mélanges en l’honneur de Françoise Thelamon, edited by S. Crogiez-Pétrequin, 113–26. Rouen: Université de Rouen.Google Scholar
Bouffartigue, Jean 2011. “Porphyre et Julien contre les chrétiens: Intentions, motifs et méthodes de leurs écrits.” In Le traité de Porphyre contre les chrétiens: Un siècle de recherches, nouvelles questions: Actes du colloque international organisé les 8 et 9 septembre 2009 à l’Université de Paris IV-Sorbonne, edited by Morlet, S., 407–26. Série Antiquité 190. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Bouffartigue, Jean and Patillon, Michel, eds. 1977. Porphyry: De l’abstinence. Livre 1, Vol. i. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile. 1994. Le paradoxe trinitaire chez Cyrille d’Alexandrie: Herméneutique, analyses philosophiques et argumentation théologique. Collection des Études Augustiniennes, Série Antiquité 143. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile. 1997. “Platon entre Moïse et Arius selon le Contre Julien de Cyrille d’Alexandrie.” Studia Patristica 32: 264–71.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2003. “The Mystery of the Trinity according to Cyril of Alexandria: The Deployment of the Triad and Its Recapitulation into the Unity of Diversity.” In The Theology of St. Cyril of Alexandria: A Critical Appreciation, edited by Weinandy, Thomas G. and Keating, Daniel A., 75–111. London: T. & T. Clark.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2006. “Le Dieu suprême peut-il entrer en contact avec le monde? Un débat entre païens et chrétiens sur la transcendance divine à partir du Contre Julien de Cyrille d’Alexandrie.” In La transcendance dans la philosophie grecque tardive et dans la pensée chrétienne (Actes du VIe congrès de philosophie grecque, Athènes 22–26 sept 2004), edited by E. Moutsopoulos and G. Lekkas, 177–96. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2008a. “Genèse 2–3: Mythe ou vérité? Un sujet de polémique entre païens et chrétiens dans le Contre Julien de Cyrille d’Alexandrie.” RÉAug 54: 111–33.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2008b. “L’élection d’Israël et la grâce offerte à tous: L’exégèse de Romains 9–11 selon Cyrille d’Alexandrie.” Adamantius 14: 266–85.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2008c. “Dieu peut-il être envieux ou jaloux? Un débat sur les attributs divins entre l’empereur Julien et Cyrille d’Alexandrie.” In Culture classique et christianisme. Mélanges offerts à Jean Bouffartigue, edited by D. Auger and É. Wolff, 13–25. Paris: Picard.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2011a. “1. Cyrille d’Alexandrie, Contre Julien IV, 29–48: L’épisode de Babel et l’origine de la diversité des nations.” AEPHE V 118: 157–61.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2011b. “La diversité des nations et l’élection d’Israël: Y a-t-il une influence du Contre Celse d’Origène sur le Contre les Galiléens de Julien?” In Origeniana decima: Origen as Writer: Papers of the 10th International Origen Congress, edited by Kaczmarek, Sylwia, Pietras, Henryk, and Dziadowiec, Andrzej, 803–30. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2011c. “Un dieu jaloux qui fait des émules: Interprétations patristiques d’Ex 20,5, Nb 25,11 et Dt 32,21.” In Jalousie des dieux, jalousie des hommes: Actes du colloque international organizé à Paris les 28 at 29 novembre 2008, edited by Rouillard-Bonraisin, H., 249–76. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2014. “‘Le Contre les Galiléens de l’empereur Julien répond-il au Contre Celse d’Origène?’” In ΕΝ ΚΑΛΟΙΣ ΚΟΙΝΟΠΡΑΓΙΑ: Hommages à la mémoire de Pierre-Louis Malosse et Jean Bouffartigue, edited by Amato, Eugenio, 103–28. Revue des Études Tardo-antiques, Supplément 3. Nantes: Association Textes pour l’histoire de l’Antiquité tardive.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2017. “Païens et chrétiens en concurrence: l’instrumentalisation de la philosophie dans les controverses d’Origène contre Celse et de Cyrille d’Alexandrie contre Julien.” In Philosophia in der Konkurrenz von Schulen, Wissenschaften und Religionen: Zur Pluralisierung des Philosophiebegriffs in Kaiserzeit und Spätantike, edited by Christoph Riedweg, 217–55. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2020b. “Le livre VIII du Contre Julien de Cyrille d’Alexandrie: Éléments pour la datation, le plan et la méthode de réfutation.” In Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert: Julian “Contra Galilaeos” – Kyrill “Contra Iulianum,” edited by Huber-Rebenich, Gerlinde and Rebenich, Stefan, 165–94. TU 181. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2020c. “Le prologue de l’évangile de Jean au coeur de la polémique entre l’empereur Julien et Cyrille d’Alexandrie.” In Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert: Julian “Contra Galilaeos” – Kyrill “Contra Iulianum,” edited by Huber-Rebenich, Gerlinde and Rebenich, Stefan, 195–227. TU 181. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2020d. “Le rôle de l’exégèse pour la formation du dogme chrétien dans la polémique antijuive: Le cas de la théophanie de Mambré (Gn 18).” In Exégèse, revelation et formation des dogmes dans l’antiquité tardive, edited by Santoprete, Luciana Gabriela Soares, Le Boulluec, Alain, and Timotin, Andrei, 241–67. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile 2021. “The Biblical Text and Its Variants at the Heart of the Debate between the Emperor Julian and Cyril of Alexandria: The Cases of Genesis 6,2 and 49,10.” ZAC 25: 284–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boys-Stones, George. 2018. Platonist Philosophy 80 bc to ad 250: An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bradbury, Scott. 2020. “Julian and the Jews.” In A Companion to Julian the Apostate, edited by Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich and Rebenich, Stefan, 267–92. Brill’s Companions to the Byzantine World 5. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bregman, Jay. 1982. Synesius of Cyrene: Philosopher-Bishop. The Transformation of the Classical Heritage 2. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisson, L. 1987. “Amélius, son œuvre, sa doctrine, son style.” ANRW 2, 36.2: 793–860.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. 2013. “Clement and Cyril of Alexandria: Confronting Platonism with Christianity.” St. Patr. 58, 6: 19–44.Google Scholar
Brüggemann, Thomas. 2020. “Ἀποστροφή in Contra Iulianum: Julian als fiktives Gegenüber Kyrills.” In Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert: Julian “Contra Galilaeos” – Kyrill “Contra Iulianum,” edited by Huber-Rebenich, Gerlinde and Rebenich, Stefan, 153–64. TU 181. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cameron, Alan and Long, Jacqueline. 1993. Barbarians and Politics at the Court of Arcadius. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil. 2014. Dialoguing in Late Antiquity. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies, Trustees for Harvard University.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil and Gaul, Niels, eds. 2017. Dialogues and Debates from Late Antiquity to Late Byzantium. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champion, Michael W. 2014. Explaining the Cosmos: Creation and Cultural Interaction in Late-Antique Gaza. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chantraine, P. 1954. “Le divin et les dieux chez Homère.” In La notion du divin depuis Homère jusqu’ à Platon, 47–79. Vandoeuvres-Geneva: Fondation Hardt.Google Scholar
Chronz, M. and Kinzig, Wolfram. 2004. “Beobachtungen zur Bucheinteilung und zum ursprünglichen Umfang von Kyrills Contra Iulianum sowie Julians Contra Galilaeos.” In “ … zur Zeit oder Unzeit” Studien zur spätantiken Theologie-, Geistes- und Kunstgeschichte und ihrer Nachwirkung, edited by Ritter, A. M., Wischmeyer, W., and Kinzig, Wolfram, 29–62. Mandelbachtal: Edition Cicero.Google Scholar
Clark, Gillian. 2000a. “Philosophic Lives and the Philosophic Life: Porphyry and Iamblichus.” In Greek Biography and Panegyric in Late Antiquity, edited by Hägg, Tomas and Rousseau, Philip, 29–51. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Gillian 2000b. Porphyry of Tyre: On Abstinence from Killing Animals. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, Kathleen. 1990. “Fatal Charades: Roman Executions Staged as Mythological Enactments.” JRS 80: 44–73.Google Scholar
Collette, Bernard. 2021. The Stoic Doctrine of Providence: A Study of Its Development and of Some of Its Major Issues. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, John Granger. 2000. The Interpretation of the New Testament in Greco-Roman Paganism. Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum 3. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Cook, John Granger 2004. The Interpretation of the Old Testament in Greco-Roman Paganism. Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum 23. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Cook, John Granger 2016. “Julian and Porphyry on the Resurrection of Jesus in the Gospels.” The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 10: 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. 2013. “Scripture as ‘One Book’: Origen, Jerome, and Cyril of Alexandria on Isaiah 29:11.” JThS 64: 137–53.Google Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. 2014. Cyril of Alexandria’s Trinitarian Theology of Scripture. Oxford Early Christian Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. 2020a. “Reconsidering the Relationship between (Pseudo-)Didymus’s De Trinitate and Cyril of Alexandria’s Contra Julianum.” JThS 71: 236–57.Google Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. 2020b. “The Influence of Eusebius’ Chronicle on the Apologetic Treatises of Cyril of Alexandria and Augustine of Hippo.” JEH 71: 693–711.Google Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. 2020c. “Cyril of Alexandria’s Contra Iulianum, Imperial Politics, and Alexandrian Philosophy (c. 416–428).” In Eastern Christianity and Late Antique Philosophy, edited by Anagnostou-Laoutides, Eva and Parry, Ken, 110–32. Texts and Studies in Eastern Christianity 18. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. 2023a. “Towards a New Edition of Julian’s Contra Galilaeos: Assessing the Material from the Syriac Transmission of Cyril’s Contra Iulianum.” Classical Quarterly 72: 850–67.Google Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. 2023b. “Cyril of Alexandria’s Renunciation of Religious Violence.” Church History 92: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. 2024. “The Emperor Julian and Cyril of Alexandria on Human Nature, Ethnicity, and Moral Progress.” ETL 100: 73–102.Google Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. 2025. “Defending the Glory of God: Cyril of Alexandria’s Political Theology at the Court of Theodosius II.” In Christian Political Cultures in Late Antiquity, edited by Flower, Richard, McEvoy, Meaghan, and Whelan, Robin. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. Forthcoming. “The Value of Human Life: Christology and Human Flourishing according to Cyril of Alexandria.” In Creation, Christology, and Human Flourishing, edited by Michael W. Champion and Matthew R. Crawford. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
De Labriolle, Pierre. 1934. La réaction païenne: Étude sur la polémique antichrétienne du Ier au VIe siècle. Paris: L’Artisan du Livre.Google Scholar
De Vita, Maria Carmen. 2020. “Callidior ceteris persecutor (Rufin. hist. 10,33): Giuliano e la questione Ariana.” In Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert: Julian “Contra Galilaeos” – Kyrill “Contra Iulianum,” edited by Huber-Rebenich, Gerlinde and Rebenich, Stefan, 39–63. TU 181. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, Jitse and Raschle, Christian R., eds. 2020. Religious Violence in the Ancient World: From Classical Athens to Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, John. 2009. “St. John in Amelius’ Seminar.” In Late Antique Epistemology: Other Ways to Truth, edited by Vassilopoulou, Panayiota and Clark, Stephen R. L., 30–43. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, J., Russell, D., and Gertz, S., trans. 2012. Aeneas of Gaza, Theophrastus. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. 1972. “Une exégèse neoplatonicienne du prologue de l’Évangile selon saint Jean.” In Épektasis: Mélanges patristiques offerts au cardinal Jean Daniélou, edited by Fontaine, Jacques and Kannengieser, Charles, 75–87. Paris: Beauchesne.Google Scholar
Dragona-Monachou, Myrto. 1994. “Divine Providence in the Philosophy of the Empire.” In ANRW 2, 36.7: 4417–90.Google Scholar
Drijvers, Jan Willem. 1992. Helena Augusta: The Mother of Constantine the Great and the Legend of Her Finding of the True Cross. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droge, Arthur J. 1989. Homer or Moses? Early Christian Interpretations of the History of Culture. Hermeneutische Untersuchungen zur Theologie 26. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Edwards, Mark. 2006. Culture and Philosophy in the Age of Plotinus. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Edwards, Mark 2015. Religions of the Constantinian Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elm, Susanna. 2012. Sons of Hellenism, Fathers of the Church: Emperor Julian, Gregory of Nazianzus, and the Vision of Rome. Transformation of the Classical Heritage 49. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Elm, Susanna 2017. “The Old Man from Tyre: Julian’s Contra Galilaeos and the Fourth-Century Nachleben of Porphyry’s Engagement with Christians.” In Die Christen als Bedrohung? Text, Kontext und Wirkung von Porphyrios’ Contra Christianos, edited by Männlein-Robert, Irmgard, 307–23. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Eubank, Nathan. 2010. “A Disconcerting Prayer: On the Originality of Luke 23:34a.” JBL 129: 521–36.Google Scholar
Fairbairn, Donald. 2003. Grace and Christology in the Early Church. Oxford Early Christian Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finamore, John F. 1988. “ΘΕΟΙ ΘΕΩΝ: An Iamblichean Doctrine in Julian’s Against the Galilaeans.” TAPhA 118: 393–401.Google Scholar
Finamore, John F. and Iles Johnston, Sarah. 2010. “The Chaldaean Oracles.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, Volume i, edited by Gerson, Lloyd P., 161–73. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Ari. 2018. The Specter of the Jews: Emperor Julian and the Rhetoric of Ethnicity in Syrian Antioch. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fowden, Garth. 1986. The Egyptian Hermes: A Historical Approach to the Late Pagan Mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Früchtel, L. 1937. “Neue Textzeugnisse zu Clemens Alexandrinus.” ZNTW 36, 1: 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaddis, M. 2005. There Is No Crime for Those Who Have Christ. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, Simon, ed. 2008. The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goulet, Richard. 2000. “Horapollon.” In Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, Volume iii, 804–06.Google Scholar
Goulet, Richard 2003. Macarios de Magnésie: Le Monogénès. Tome i: Introduction générale. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Goulet, Richard 2004. “Hypothèses récentes sur le traité de Porphyre Contre les chrétiens.” In Hellénisme et Christianisme, edited by Narcy, Michel and Rebillard, Éric, 61–109. Villeneuve-d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Goulet, Richard 2005. “Le titre de l’ouvrage.” In Porphyre. Sentences, Volume i, edited by Brisson, Luc, 11–16. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Grant, Robert M. 1964. “Greek Literature in the Treatise De Trinitate and Cyril Contra Julianum.” JThS 15: 265–79.Google Scholar
Greatrex, Geoffrey. 2018. “Zacharias Rhetor of Mytilene.” Oxford Dictionary of Late Antiquity, Volume ii, edited by Nicholson, Oliver, 1605–07. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenwood, David Neal. 2021. Julian and Christianity: Revisiting the Constantinian Revolution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Greer, Rowan and Mitchell, Margaret, eds. 2007. The “Belly-Myther” of Endor: Interpretations of I Kingdoms 28 in the Early Church. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Griffith, Sydney. 1987. “Ephrem the Syrian’s Hymns ‘Against Julian’: Meditations on History and Imperial Power.” Vig.Christ. 41: 238–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, J. G. 1948. “Human Sacrifices in Egypt: The Classical Evidence.” ASAE 48: 409–23.Google Scholar
Guida, Augusto. 1996. “Altre testimonianze e un nuovo frammento del ‘Contro i Galilei’ di Giuliano Imperatore.” In Hodoi dizēsios: Le vie della ricerca: Studi in onore di Francesco Adorno, edited by Funghi, M. Serena, 241–52. Florence: L. S. Olschki.Google Scholar
Guida, Augusto 2020. “La trasmissione del testo del Contra Galilaeos di Giuliano e un nuovo misterioso frammento.” In Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert: Julian “Contra Galilaeos” – Kyrill “Contra Iulianum,” edited by Huber-Rebenich, Gerlinde and Rebenich, Stefan, 91–109. TU 181. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Guinot, Jean-Noël. 1988. “L’exégèse du bouc émissaire chez Cyrille d’Alexandrie et Théodoret de Cyr.” Augustinianum 28: 603–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Christopher. 1997. Alexandria in Late Antiquity: Topography and Social Conflict. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hahn, Johannes. 2004. Gewalt und religiöser Konflikt: Studien zu den Auseinandersetzungen zwischen Christen, Heiden und Juden im Osten des Römischen Reiches (von Konstantin bis Theodosius II). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammerstaedt, J. 1996. “Die Vergöttlichung unwürdiger Menschen bei den Heiden als apologetisches Argument in Schriften des Sokrates, Theodoret, Cyrill von Alexandrien und Johannes Chrysostomos.” JbAC 39: 76–101.Google Scholar
Hanson, R. P. C. 1988. The Search for the Christian Doctrine of God: The Arian Controversy 318–381. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.Google Scholar
Hardy, E. R. 1982. “The Further Education of Cyril of Alexandria (412–444): Questions and Problems.” Studia Patristica 17, 1: 116–22.Google Scholar
Harries, Jill. 2012. “Julian the Lawgiver.” In Emperor and Author: The Writings of Julian the Apostate, edited by Baker-Brian, Nicholas and Tougher, Shaun, 121–36. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Harvey, Susan Ashbrook. 2006. Scenting Salvation: Ancient Christianity and the Olfactory Imagination. Transformation of the Classical Heritage 42. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Heubeck, A., West, S., and Hainsworth, J. G.. 1988. A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey. Three volumes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hintze, F. and Morenz, S.. 1954. “Ein Streitgespräch Kyrills.” Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde 79: 125–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d’Hoine, Pieter and Martijn, Marije. 2017. All from One: A Guide to Proclus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Philippe. 1994. “Damascius.” Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, Volume ii, 541–93.Google Scholar
Hombert, Pierre-Marie. 2023. “Le De Trinitate attribué à Didyme d’Alexandrie: Un nouveau status quaestionis.” Revue d’études augustiniennes et patristiques 69: 3–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Horst, Pieter W. 1993. “‘Thou Shalt Not Revile the Gods’: The LXX Translation of Exodus 22:28 (27), Its Background and Influence.” Studia Philonica 5: 1–8.Google Scholar
Huber-Rebenich, Gerlinde and Rebenich, Stefan, eds. 2020. Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert: Julian “Contra Galilaeos” – Kyrill “Contra Iulianum.” TU 181. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Huffman, Carl. 2012. “Aristoxenus’ Life of Socrates.” In Aristoxenus of Tarentum, edited by Huffman, Carl, 251–82. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
Hunt, David. 2012. “The Christian Context of Julian’s Against the Galileans.” In Emperor and Author: The Writings of Julian the Apostate, edited by Baker-Brian, Nicholas and Tougher, Shaun, 251–61. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2006a. Ethnicity and Argument in Eusebius’ Praeparatio Evangelica. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2006b. “Eusebius’ Praeparatio Evangelica as Literary Experiment.” In Greek Literature in Late Antiquity: Dynamism, Didacticism, Classicism, edited by Johnson, Scott F., 67–89. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2010. “Rethinking the Authenticity of Porphyry, contra Christianos, fr. 1.” Studia Patristica 46: 53–58.Google Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2012a. “Hellenism and Its Discontents.” In The Oxford Handbook of Late Antiquity, edited by Johnson, Scott F., 437–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2012b. “Philosophy, Hellenicity, Law: Porphyry on Origen, Again.” JHS 132: 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2013. Religion and Identity in Porphyry of Tyre: The Limits of Hellenism in Late Antiquity. Greek Culture in the Roman World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2015. “Astrology and the Will in Porphyry of Tyre.” In Causation and Creation in Classical and Late Antiquity, 186–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2017. “Early Christianity and the Classical Tradition.” In The Oxford Handbook to the Second Sophistic, edited by Richter, Daniel S. and Johnson, William A., 625–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2019. “The Fifth-Century Transformation of Apologetics in Cyril and Theodoret.” In The Fifth Century: Age of Transformation, edited by Drijvers, Jan Willem and Lenski, Noel, 247–59. Munera: Studi storici sulla Tarda Antichità 46. Bari: Edipuglia.Google Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2020. “Words at War: Textual Violence in Eusebius.” In The Violence of Small Worlds: Conflict and Social Control in Late Antiquity, edited by Cooper, Kate and Wood, Jamie, 213–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2021. “Philosophy in Eusebius and Marcellus.” In The Routledge Handbook of Early Christian Philosophy, edited by Edwards, Mark, 450–60. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. Forthcoming. “Cyril of Alexandria as a Reader of Plato.” In Platonic Principles: Studies in Honor of Lloyd Gerson, edited by Lauritzen, Frederick and Wear, Sarah Klitenic. Steubenville, OH: Franciscan University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, A. H. M., Martindale, J. R., and Morris, J.. 1971. The Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire. Three volumes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaldellis, Anthony. 2005. “Julian, the Hierophant of Eleusis, and the Abolition of Constantius’ Tyranny.” CQ 55: 652–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufhold, Hubert. 2020. “Werke des Kyrill in syrischer Überlieferung.” In Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert: Julian “Contra Galilaeos” – Kyrill “Contra Iulianum,” edited by Huber-Rebenich, Gerlinde and Rebenich, Stefan, 229–55. TU 181. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kinzig, Wolfram. 2020. “Structure and Sitz im Leben of Cyril of Alexandria’s Contra Iulianum.” In Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert: Julian “Contra Galilaeos” – Kyrill “Contra Iulianum,” edited by Huber-Rebenich, Gerlinde and Rebenich, Stefan, 111–29. TU 181. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kinzig, Wolfram and Brüggemann, Thomas. 2006. “Towards a Better Understanding of Cyril of Alexandria’s Against Julian: The Manuscripts Used by Jean Aubert in His Edition of 1638.” Studia Patristica 40: 267–74.Google Scholar
LaValle Norman, Dawn and Petkas, Alex, eds. 2020. Hypatia of Alexandria: Her Context and Legacy. Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum 119. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenski, N. 2002. Failure of Empire: Valens and the Roman State in the Fourth Century ad. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Levenson, David B. 2004. “The Ancient and Medieval Sources for the Emperor Julian’s Attempt to Rebuild the Jerusalem Temple.” JSJ 35: 409–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liébaert, Jacques. 1951. La doctrine christologique de saint Cyrille d’Alexandrie avant la querelle nestorienne. Lille: Facultés Catholiques.Google Scholar
Liebeschuetz, J. H. W. G. 2012. “Julian’s Hymn to the Mother of the Gods: The Revival and Justification of Traditional Religion.” In Emperor and Author: The Writings of Julian the Apostate, edited by Baker-Brian, Nicholas and Tougher, Shaun, 213–27. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Magree, Michael C. 2024. The Interpretation of Kenosis from Origen to Cyril of Alexandria: Dimensions of Self-Emptying in the Reception of Philippians 2:7. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malley, William J. 1978. Hellenism and Christianity: The Conflict between Hellenic and Christian Wisdom in the “Contra Galilaeos” of Julian the Apostate and the “Contra Julianum” of St. Cyril of Alexandria. Analecta Gregoriana 210. Rome: Università Gregoriana.Google Scholar
Männlein-Robert, I. 2013. “Tugend, Flucht und Ekstase: Zur ὁμοίωσις θεῷ in der Kaiserzeit und Spätantike.” In Ethik des antiken Platonismus: Der platonische Weg zum Glück in Systematik, Entstehung und historischem Kontext, edited by Ch. Pietsch, 99–111. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Marcone, Arnaldo. 2019. “Il Contro i Galilei di Giuliano edito da Voltaire. Storia – e paradossi – di un pamphlet di polemica religiosa.” In PHILOBIBLOS: Scritti in onore di Giovanni Geraci, edited by Bencivenni, A. et al., 545–66. Milan: Jouvence.Google Scholar
Marcone, Arnaldo 2020. “Pagan Reactions to Julian.” In A Companion to Julian the Apostate, edited by Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich and Rebenich, Stefan, 326–59. Brill’s Companions to the Byzantine World 5. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Mason, Hugh. 1974. Greek Terms for Roman Institutions. American Studies in Papyrology 13. Toronto: Hakkert.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Judith. 2007. The Architecture of Alexandria and Egypt c. 300 bc to ad 700. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Meijering, E. P. 1975. “Cyril of Alexandria on the Platonists and the Trinity.” In God, Being, History: Studies in Patristic Philosophy, 114–27. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Millar, Fergus. 2006. A Greek Roman Empire: Power and Belief under Theodosius II (408–450). Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Margaret M. 2022. “‘Snacking on Greek Learning’: Julian and Cyril in Scriptural σύγκρισις.” Paper delivered at the North American Patristics Society annual meeting.Google Scholar
Morlet, S. 2008. “Un nouveau témoignage sur le Contra Christianos de Porphyre?” Semitica et Classica 1: 149–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morlet, S. 2009. La Démonstration Évangélique d’Eusèbe de Césarée: Étude sur l’apologétique chrétienne à l’époque de Constantin. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Morlet, S. 2011a. “Pourquoi Dieu a-t-il interdit la connaissance du bien et du mal? La critique porphyrienne de Gn 2, 17: Le problème de ses sources et de sa postérité.” Semitica et Classica 4: 125–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morlet, S. 2011b. “Eusebius’ Polemic against Porphyry: A Reassessment.” In Reconsidering Eusebius, edited by Inowlocki, Sabrina and Zamagni, Claudio, 119–50. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 107. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, Heinz-Günther. 2001. “Kaiserlicher Held und Christenfeind: Julian Apostata im Urteil des späteren 4. und des 5. Jh.s n. Chr.” In Die Welt des Sokrates von Konstantinopel, edited by Bäbler, B. and Nesselrath, H.-G., 15–43. Munich; Leipzig: K. G. Saur.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, Heinz-Günther 2020a. “Julian’s Philosophical Writings.” In A Companion to Julian the Apostate, edited by Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich and Rebenich, Stefan, 38–63. Brill’s Companions to the Byzantine World 5. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesselrath, Heinz-Günther 2020b. “Von götterlosen Galiläern und grotesken Gräberkulten.” In Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert: Julian “Contra Galilaeos” – Kyrill “Contra Iulianum,” edited by Huber-Rebenich, Gerlinde and Rebenich, Stefan, 1–14. TU 181. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Niccolai, Lea. 2023. Christianity, Philosophy, and Roman Power: Constantine, Julian, and the Bishops on Exegesis and Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nünlist, René. 2009. The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2018. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton Classics. Princeton Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Paget, James Carleton and Gathercole, Simon, eds. 2021. Celsus in His World: Philosophy, Polemic and Religion in the Second Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadogiannakis, Yannis. 2012. Christianity and Hellenism in the Fifth-Century Greek East: Theodoret’s Apologetics against the Greeks in Context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Perrone, L. 1994. “Echi della polemica pagana sulla Bibbia negli scritti esegetici fra IV e V secolo: Le ‘Quaestiones Veteris et Novi Testamenti’ dell’ Ambrosiaster.” AnnSE 11: 161–85.Google Scholar
Pietsch, Thomas. 2023. “St Cyril of Alexandria and the Mysteries of Isis in De Adoratione.” JEH 74: 703–19.Google Scholar
Pilhofer, Peter. 1990. Presbyteron kreitton: Der Altersbeweis der jüdischen und christlichen Apologeten und seine Vorgeschichte. WUNT 39. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Rebenich, Stefan. 2020. “Julian’s Afterlife: The Reception of a Roman Emperor.” In A Companion to Julian the Apostate, edited by Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich and Rebenich, Stefan, 398–420. Brill’s Companions to the Byzantine World 5. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebenich, Stefan 2021. “‘History in Cyril’: Das historische Argument in der Schrift Contra Iulianum des Patriarchen Kyrill von Alexandrien.” In Ecclesia victrix? Zum Verhältnis von Staat und Kirche in der Spätantike: Festschrift für Klaus Martin Girardet, edited by Aydin, Karen, van Hoof, Christine, and Mathieu, Lukas, 169–85. Berlin: LIT.Google Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph. 1994. Ps-Justin (Markell von Ankyra?), Ad Graecos de vera religione (bisher “Cohortatio ad Graecos”): Einleitung und Kommentar. 2 vols. Schweizerische Beiträge zur Altertumswissenschaft 25. Basel: F. Reinhardt.Google Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph 1999. “With Stoicism and Platonism against the Christians: Structures of Philosophical Argumentation in Julian’s Contra Galilaeos.” Hermathena 166: 63–91.Google Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph 2000. “Zur handschriftlichen Überlieferung der Apologie Kyrills von Alexandrien Contra Iulianum.” Museum Helveticum 57: 151–65.Google Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph 2005. “Mythos mit geheimem Sinn oder reine Blasphemie? Julian über die mosaische Erzählung vom Sündenfall (Contra Galilaeos fr. 17,10–12 Masaracchia).” In κορυφαίῳ ἀνδρί: Mélanges offerts à André Hurst, edited by Kolde, A., Lukinovich, A., and Rey, A.-L., 367–75. Recherches et rencontres 22. Geneva: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph 2008a. “Das Verbot, vom Baum der Erkenntnis von Gut und Böse zu essen (Gen 2, 17): Zeichen eines missgünstigen Gottes? Kaiser Julian und Kyrill von Alexandrien in einer virtuellen Debatte.” In Beyond Eden: The Biblical Story of Paradise (Genesis 2–3) and Its Reception History, edited by Schmid, K. and Riedweg, Christoph, 187–208. Tübingen: Mohr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph 2008b. “Julians Exegese der Rede des Demiurgen an die versammelten Götter in Platons Timaios 41a–d.” In Culture classique et christianisme: Mélanges offerts à Jean Bouffartigue, edited by Auger, Danièle and Wolff, Étienne, 83–95. Paris: Picard.Google Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph 2011. “Alexander of Aphrodisias, De Prouidentia: Greek Fragments and Arabic Versions.” In Culture in Pieces: Essays on Ancient Texts in Honour of Peter Parsons, edited by Obbink, Dirk and Rutherford, Richard, 277–301. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph 2012. “Exegese als Kampfmittel in der Auseinandersetzung zwischen Heiden und Christen: Zum ‘Sündenbock’ von Lev 16 bei Julian und Kyrill von Alexandrien.” ZAC 16, 3: 439–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph 2020a. “A German Renaissance Humanist as Predecessors and Some Further Surprises.” In Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert: Julian “Contra Galilaeos” – Kyrill “Contra Iulianum,” edited by Huber-Rebenich, Gerlinde and Rebenich, Stefan, 257–85. TU 181. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph 2020b. “Anti-Christian Polemics and Pagan Onto-Theology: Julian’s Against the Galilaeans.” In A Companion to Julian the Apostate, edited by Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich and Rebenich, Stefan, 244–66. Brill’s Companions to the Byzantine World 5. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph and Oesterheld, Christian. 1998. “Scritto e controscritto: Per una nuova edizione di Cirillo Alessandrino Contra Iulianum.” In Giuliano Imperatore: Le sue idee, i suoi amici, i suoi avversari. Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studi, Lecce, 10–12 Dicembre 1998. Rudiae (Ricerche sul mondo classico) 10: 415–33.Google Scholar
Rigolio, Alberto. 2019. Christians in Conversation: A Guide to Late Antique Dialogues in Greek and Syriac. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, Adolf Martin. 2020. “Theologische Kontroversen innerhalb der römischen Reichskirche und ihre Widerspiegelung in der Christenpolemik Kaiser Julians.” In Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert: Julian “Contra Galilaeos” – Kyrill “Contra Iulianum,” edited by Huber-Rebenich, Gerlinde and Rebenich, Stefan, 15–38. TU 181. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Runia, David T. 1997. “The Text of the Platonic Citations in Philo of Alexandria.” In Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition: Essays Presented to John Whittaker, edited by Joyal, M., 261–92. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Runia, David T. 2023. “The Aëtian Placita and the Church Fathers: Creative Use of a Distinctive Mode of Ordering Knowledge.” In The Intellectual World of Late Antique Christianity: Reshaping Classical Traditions, edited by Ayres, Lewis, Champion, Michael, and Crawford, Matthew R., 198–220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Norman. 2000. Cyril of Alexandria. The Early Church Fathers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Russell, Norman 2007. “The Church in the Commentaries of St. Cyril of Alexandria.” International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church 7: 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandwell, Isabella. 2005. “Outlawing ‘Magic’ or Outlawing ‘Religion’? Libanius and the Theodosian Code as Evidence for Legislation against ‘Pagan’ Practices.” In The Spread of Christianity in the First Four Centuries, edited by Harris, W. V., 87–123. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schibli, Hermann S. 2002. Hierocles of Alexandria. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Hofner, Sebastian. 2020. “Reform, Routine, and Propaganda: Julian the Lawgiver.” In A Companion to Julian the Apostate, edited by Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich and Rebenich, Stefan, 124–71. Brill’s Companions to the Byzantine World 5. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Schrader, Hermann. 1888. “Zu den Fragmenten des Φιλόσοφος Ἱστορία des Porphyrios bei Cyrill von Alexandria.” AGPh 1, 3: 359–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schramm, Michael. 2017. “Platonikerzitate in Kyrill von Alexandrias Contra Iulianum.” Mus.Helv. 74: 66–85.Google Scholar
Sferlea, Gheorghe Ovidiu. 2016. “Le titre Theotokos dans les débats christologiques du IVe siècle.” Laval théologique et philosophique 72: 491–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddals, Ruth M. 1987. “Logic and Christology in Cyril of Alexandria.” JThS 38: 341–67.Google Scholar
Smith, Rowland. 1995. Julian’s Gods: Religion and Philosophy in the Thought and Action of Julian the Apostate. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Speller, Lydia Agnew. 1983. “New Light on the Photinians: The Evidence of Ambrosiaster.” JThS 34: 99–113.Google Scholar
Steel, Carlos. 2010. “Proclus.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, Volume ii, edited by Gerson, Lloyd P., 630–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stöcklin-Kaldewey, Sara. 2014. Kaiser Julians Gottesverehrung im Kontext der Spätantike. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaseanu-Döbler, Ilinca. 2013. Theurgy in Late Antiquity: The Invention of a Ritual Tradition. Beiträge zur Europäischen Religionsgeschichte 1. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres, Juana. 2009. “Emperor Julian and the Veneration of Relics.” AntTard 17: 205–14.Google Scholar
Trombley, F. 2001. Hellenic Religion and Christianization: C. 370–529. Two volumes. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Trovato, Stefano. 2012. “Un nuovo frammento e nuove testimonianze del ‘Contra Galilaeos’ di Giuliano l’Apostata.” JöByz 62: 265–79.Google Scholar
Vaccari, A. 1937. “La grecità di S. Cirillo d’Alessandria.” In Studi dedicati alla memoria di P. Ubaldi, edited by Gemelli, A., 27–39. Milan: Società Editrice “Vita e Pensiero.”Google Scholar
van Loon, Hans. 2009. The Dyophysite Christology of Cyril of Alexandria. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 96. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Riel, Gerd. 2010. “Damascius.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, Volume ii, edited by Gerson, Lloyd P., 667–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Villani, Barbara. 2022. “Creation of the Universe and Creation of Man in Cyril of Alexandria’s Early Works on the Pentateuch.” ZAC 26: 145–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viltanioti, Irini-Fotini and Marmodoro, Anna, eds. 2017. Divine Powers in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vinzent, Markus. 2000. “‘Oxbridge’ in der ausgehenden Spätantike, oder: Ein Vergleich der Schulen von Athen und Alexandrien.” ZAC 4: 49–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinzent, Markus 2001. “Halbe Heiden – Doppelte Christen: Die Festbriefe Kyrills von Alexandrien und die Datierung seines Werkes Contra Iulianum.” In Christen und Nichtchristen in Spätantike, Neuzeit und Gegenwart: Beginn und Ende des Konstantinischen Zeitalters, edited by Dörfler-Dierken, Angelika, Kinzig, Wolfram, and Vinzent, Markus, 41–60. Mandelbachtal: Edition Cicero.Google Scholar
Vössing, Konrad. 2020. “The Value of a Good Education: The School Law in Context.” In A Companion to Julian the Apostate, edited by Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich and Rebenich, Stefan, 172–206. Brill’s Companions to the Byzantine World 5. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Edwards J. 2006. City and School in Late Antique Athens and Alexandria. Transformation of the Classical Heritage 41. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Watts, Edwards J. 2010. Riot in Alexandria: Tradition and Group Dynamics in Late Antique Pagan and Christian Communities. The Transformation of the Classical Heritage 46. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Edwards J. 2017. Hypatia: The Life and Legend of an Ancient Philosopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Westerfeld, Jennifer Taylor. 2019. Egyptian Hieroglyphs in the Late Antique Imagination. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich. 2020. “Revival and Reform: The Religious Policy of Julian.” In A Companion to Julian the Apostate, edited by Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich and Rebenich, Stefan, 207–44. Brill’s Companions to the Byzantine World 5. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich and Rebenich, Stefan, eds. 2020. A Companion to Julian the Apostate. Brill’s Companions to the Byzantine World 5. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilken, Robert L. 1999. “Cyril of Alexandria’s Contra Iulianum.” In The Limits of Ancient Christianity: Essays on Late Antique Thought and Culture in Honor of R. A. Markus, edited by Klingshirn, William E. and Vessey, Mark, 42–55. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Woodbury, L. 1973. “Socrates and the Daughter of Aristides.” Phoenix 27: 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaganas, Dimitrios. 2019. La formation d’une exégèse alexandrine post-origénienne: Les Commentaires sur les Douze Prophètes et sur Isaïe de Cyrille d’Alexandrie. Traditio Exegetica Graeca 17. Leuven: Peeters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeegers-Vander Vorst, N. 1972. Les citations des poètes grecs chez les apologistes chrétiens du IIe siècle. Louvain: Publications Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.