Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-wdhn8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-13T20:42:03.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 12 - Actor–Network Theory and Strategy as Practice

from Part II - Theoretical Resources: Social Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2025

By
Christopher S. Chapman ,
Wai Fong Chua  and
Habib Mahama
Edited by
Damon Golsorkhi ,
Linda Rouleau ,
David Seidl  and
Eero Vaara
Damon Golsorkhi
Affiliation:
emlyon Business School
Linda Rouleau
Affiliation:
HEC Montréal
David Seidl
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Eero Vaara
Affiliation:
Saïd Business School, University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Christopher Chapman, Wai-Fong Chua and Habib Mahama discuss the varieties of points of contact between Actor–Network theory and strategy as practice research. They review the origins of Actor–Network theory and discuss three of its foundational principles: generalized symmetry, recursivity and radical indeterminacy. The authors describe how various streams of preoccupations related to strategic decision making, planning, accounting and control have dealt with these principles over time. By showing how these principles have been drawn on in empirical studies, Chapman, Chua and Mahama elaborate on how SAP researchers can draw on Actor–Network theorizing to fruitfully advance our understanding of the dispersed, complex and non-linear trajectory of strategy-making.

Keywords

strategy as practicepractice approachActor–Network Theorygeneralized symmetryrecursivityradical indeterminacy
Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice , pp. 212 - 229
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andon, P., Baxter, J. and Chua, W. F. (2023), ‘Affect and reason in uncertain accounting settings: the case of capital investment appraisal’, Accounting and Finance, https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araujo, L. and Easton, G. (1996), ‘Strategy: where is the pattern?’, Organization, 3: 361–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J., Jacobs, C., Jarzabkowski, P., Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2014), ‘Placing strategy discourse in context: sociomateriality, sensemaking, and power’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, J., Carlsson-Wall, M., Chua, W. F. and Kraus, K. (2019), ‘Accounting and passionate interests: the case of a Swedish football club’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 74: 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckert, J. (2016), Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bencherki, N., Sergi, V., Cooren, F. and Vásquez, C. (2021), ‘How strategy comes to matter: strategizing as the communicative materialization of matters of concern’, Strategic Organization, 19: 608–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloor, D. (1982), ‘Wittgenstein and Mannheim on the sociology of mathematics’, in Collins, H. M. (ed.), Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: A Source Book: 39–57. Bath: Bath University Press.Google Scholar
Bloor, D. (1991), Knowledge and Social Imagery, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boedker, C. and Chua, W. F. (2013), ‘Accounting as an affective technology: a study of circulation, agency and entrancement’, Accounting, Organisations and Society, 38: 245–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briers, M. and Chua, W. F. (2001), ‘The role of actor-networks and boundary objects in management accounting change: a field study of an implementation of activity-based costing’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26: 237–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brundin, E., Liu, F. and Cyron, T. (2022), ‘Emotion in strategic management: a review and future research agenda’, Long Range Planning, 53: 1–34.Google Scholar
Busco, C. and Quattrone, P. (2018), ‘In search of the “perfect one”: how accounting as a maieutic machine sustains inventions through generative “intensions”’, Management Accounting Research, 39: 1e16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busuioc, M. (2021), ‘Accountable artificial intelligence: holding algorithms to account public’, Administration Review, 81/5: 825–36.Google Scholar
Cabantous, L., Gond, J. and Johnson-Cramer, M. (2010), ‘Decision theory as practice: crafting rationality in organisations’, Organization Studies, 31: 1531–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caliskan, K. and Callon, M. (2009), ‘Economization, part 1: shifting attention from the economy towards processes of economization’, Economy and Society, 38: 369–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M. (2004), ‘Europe wrestling with technology’, Economy & Society, 33: 121–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M. (2009), ‘Civilizing markets: carbon trading between in vitro and in vivo experiments’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33: 535–48.Google Scholar
Callon, M. and Law, J. (1982), ‘On interests and their transformation: enrolment and counter-enrolment’, Social Studies of Science, 12: 615–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M., Lascoumes, P. and Barthe, Y. (2009), Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Translated by Burchell, G.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Callon, M., Law, J. and Rip, A. (1986), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson-Wal, M., Kaarboe, K., Kraus, K. and Meidell, A. (2021), ‘Risk management as passionate imitation: the interconnections among emotions, performance metrics, and risk in a global technology firm’, Abacus, 57: 72–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartel, M., Boxenbaum, E. and Aggeri, F. (2019), ‘Just for fun! How experimental spaces stimulate innovation in institutionalized fields’, Organization Studies, 40/1: 65–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chua, W. F. (1995), ‘Experts, networks and inscriptions in the fabrication of accounting images: a story of the representation of three public hospitals’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20: 111–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chua, W. F. and Mahama, H. (2007), ‘The effects of network ties on accounting controls in a supply alliance: a field study’, Contemporary Accounting Research, 24: 47–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chua, W. F., Fiedler, T. and Boedker, C. (2023), Projecting, Infrastructuring and Calculating: from an in vitro to an in vivo Carbon Market. Working Paper. University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Chua, W. F., Hardy, C. and Chapman, C. (2022), Enacting Control as Entangled, Sociomaterial Practice. Working Paper, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Dambrin, C. and Robson, K. (2011), ‘Tracing performance in the pharmaceutical industry: ambivalence, opacity and the performativity of flawed measures’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36: 428–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, T. (2013), ‘Analytics 3.0’, Harvard Business Review, December: 65–72.Google Scholar
Denis, J-L., Dompierre, G., Langley, A. and Rouleau, L. (2011), ‘Escalating indecision: between reification and strategic ambiguity’, Organization Science, 22/1: 225–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emirbayer, M. and Mische, A. (1998), ‘What is agency?’ American Journal of Sociology, 103(4): 962–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S. (2000), ‘Organizational routines as a source of continuous change’, Organization Science, 11/6: 611–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S. (2015), ‘Theory of routine dynamics and connections to strategy as practice’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Vaara, E., and Seidl, D. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 317–30. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S. and Orlikowski, W. J. (2011), ‘Theorizing practice and practicing theory’, Organization Science, 22/5: 1240–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraudeau, M. (2008), ‘The draft of strategy: opening up plans and their uses’, Long Range Planning, 41: 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, D. (2001), ‘Ontology matters: the relational materiality of nature and agri-food studies’, Sociologia Ruralis, 41: 182–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grand, S. and Bartl, D. (2019), ‘Making new strategic moves possible: how executive management enacts strategizing routines to strengthen entrepreneurial agility’, in Feldman, M., d’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., and Jarzabkowski, P. (eds), Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. and Williams, W. 2007), ‘Strategic tools: an empirical investigation into strategy in practice in the UK’, Strategic Change, 16: 201–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Burke, G. and Spee, P. (2015), ‘Constructing spaces for strategic work: a multimodal perspective’, British Journal of Management, 26/S1: S26–S47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Kavas, M. and Krull, E. (2021), ‘It’s practice. But is it strategy? Reinvigorating strategy-as-practice by rethinking consequentiality’, Organization Theory, 2: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Spee, P. and Smets, M. (2013), ‘Material artifacts: practices for doing strategy with “stuff”’, European Management Journal, 31/1: 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayatekin, S. A. (1998), ‘Observations on some theories of current agrarian change’, Review of African Political Economy, 25: 207–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A. and Christin, A. (2020), ‘Algorithms at work: the new contested terrain of control’, Academy of Management Anals, 14/1: 366–410.Google Scholar
Keys, P. (1998), ‘OR as technology revisited’, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49: 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunc, M. and O’Brien, F. A. (2019), ‘The role of business analytics in supporting strategy processes: opportunities and limitations’, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70/6: 974–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1986), ‘The powers of association’, in Law, J. (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? 264–80. London, Boston and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1987), Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1993), We Have Never Been Modern. Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2005), Reassembling the Social – an Introduction to Actor Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. and Lepinay, V. A. (2009), The Science of Passionate Interests: An Introduction to Gabriel Tarde’s Economic Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1986), Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Law, J. (1992), ‘Notes on the theory of the Actor-Network: ordering, strategy and heterogeneity’, Systems Practice, 5: 379–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, J. (1994), Organizing Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Law, J. (1999), ‘After ANT: complexity, naming and topology’, in Law, J., and Hassard, J. (eds), Actor Network Theory and After: 1–14. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Markus, L. (2017), ‘Datafication, organizational strategy and IS research: what’s the score?’, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 26/3: 233–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, D., Pflueger, D. and Palermo, T. (2022), ‘Accounting and the territorialization of markets: a field study of the Colorado cannabis market’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2022.101351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAfee, A. and Brynjolfsson, E. (2012), ‘Big Data: the management revolution’, Harvard Business Review, October: 1–9.Google Scholar
McGrail, R. (2008), ‘Working with substance: Actor-Network Theory and the modal weight of the material, techné’, Research in Philosophy and Technology, 12/1: 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mische, A. (2014), ‘Measuring futures in action: projective grammars in the Rio+20 debates’, Theory and Society, 43: 437–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007), ‘Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work’, Organization Studies, 28: 1435–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, A. (1992), Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitsis, T. S., Clegg, S. R., Marosszeky, M. and Rura-Polley, T. (2003), ‘Constructing the Olympic dream: a future perfect strategy of project management’, Organization Science, 14/5: 574–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, A. M., Cooper, D. J. and Coombs, R. W. (1992), ‘Fabricating budgets: a study of the production of management budgeting in the National Health Service’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17: 561–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qu, S. Q. and Cooper, D. J. (2011), ‘The role of inscriptions in producing a balanced scorecard’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36: 344–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasche, A. and Chia, R. (2009), ‘Researching strategy practices: a genealogical social theory perspective’, Organization Studies, 30: 713–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, K. (1991), ‘On the arenas of accounting change: the process of translation’, Accounting Organizations and Society, 16: 547–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, K. (1992), ‘Accounting numbers as “inscription”: action at a distance and the development of accounting’, Accounting Organizations and Society, 17: 685–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, K. and Bottausci, C. (2018), ‘The sociology of translation and accounting inscriptions: reflections on Latour and accounting research’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 54: 60–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, K., Knorr Cetina, K. and von Savigny, (eds) (2001), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schneider, F., Steiger, D., Ledermann, T., Fry, P. and Rist, S. (2010), ‘No-tillage farming: co-creation of innovation through network building’, Land Degradation and Development, 23/3: 242–55.Google Scholar
Scott, S. V. and Orlikowski, W. J. (2012), ‘Reconfiguring relations of accountability: materialization of social media in the travel sector’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37: 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, D., Jarzabkowski, P. and Grossmann-Hensel, B. (2021), ‘Strategy as practice and routine dynamics’, in Feldman, M., Pentland, B., d’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C., and Seidl, D. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics: 481–500. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skærbæk, P. and Tryggestad, K. (2010), ‘The role of accounting devices in performing strategy’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35: 108–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soderbaum, P. (1993), ‘Values, markets, and environmental policy: an Actor-Network approach’, Journal of Economic Issues, 27: 387–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, J., Coopmans, S. and Whyte, J. (2006), ‘Structure and agency? Actor-network theory and strategic organization’, Strategic Organization, 4: 303–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G. and Koch, J. (2009), ‘Organizational path dependence: opening the black box’, Academy of Management Review, 34/4: 689–709.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. B. (1990), Ideology and Modern Culture. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
van den Ende, L. and van Marrewijk, A. (2018), ‘The point of no return: ritual performance and strategy making in project organizations’, Long Range Planning, 51/3: 451–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vásquez, C., Bencherki, N., Cooren, F. and Sergi, V. (2018), ‘From “matters of concern” to “matters of authority”: studying the performativity of strategy from a communicative constitution of organization (CCO) approach’, Long Range Planning, 51/3: 417–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2006), ‘Completing the practice turn in strategy research’, Organization Studies, 27: 613–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2014), ‘Information systems strategy and strategy-as-practice: a joint agenda’, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23/1: 87–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, L. and Mouritsen, J. (2020), ‘Accounting, simultaneity and relative completeness: the sales and operations planning forecast and the enactment of the “demand chain”’, Accounting, Organisations and Society, 84: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×