Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of School–University Partnerships
- The Cambridge Handbook of School–University Partnerships
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I The History and Conceptual Foundations of School–University Partnerships
- Part II Teachers and Learning to Teach in School–University Partnerships
- Part III Equity and Student Learning in School–University Partnerships
- Part IV Leadership in School–University Partnerships
- Part V Community Schools as School–University Partnerships
- Part VI Inquiry and Innovation in School–University Partnerships
- Introduction to Part VI: Inquiry and Innovation in School–University Partnerships
- 37 Exploring the Promise and Possibility of Innovation in Professional Development Schools
- 38 Locating Practitioner Inquiry within the Professional Development School Movement
- 39 Teacher Inquiry in Professional Development Schools
- 40 Leveraging Action Research to Create Innovative P-12 Systems Change in School–University Partnerships
- 41 Professional Development Schools as Networked, Systemic Innovations
- 42 Pre-Collegiate Grow Your Own Programs as Innovative School–University Partnerships
- 43 What’s Needed Now
- 44 Commentary on Part VI: Inquiry and Innovation in School–University Partnerships
- Part VII Funding, Policy, and the Politics of School–University Partnerships
- Part VIII Looking at School–University Partnerships across Geographic and Cultural Borders
- Index
- References
40 - Leveraging Action Research to Create Innovative P-12 Systems Change in School–University Partnerships
from Part VI - Inquiry and Innovation in School–University Partnerships
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2025
Edited in association with
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of School–University Partnerships
- The Cambridge Handbook of School–University Partnerships
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I The History and Conceptual Foundations of School–University Partnerships
- Part II Teachers and Learning to Teach in School–University Partnerships
- Part III Equity and Student Learning in School–University Partnerships
- Part IV Leadership in School–University Partnerships
- Part V Community Schools as School–University Partnerships
- Part VI Inquiry and Innovation in School–University Partnerships
- Introduction to Part VI: Inquiry and Innovation in School–University Partnerships
- 37 Exploring the Promise and Possibility of Innovation in Professional Development Schools
- 38 Locating Practitioner Inquiry within the Professional Development School Movement
- 39 Teacher Inquiry in Professional Development Schools
- 40 Leveraging Action Research to Create Innovative P-12 Systems Change in School–University Partnerships
- 41 Professional Development Schools as Networked, Systemic Innovations
- 42 Pre-Collegiate Grow Your Own Programs as Innovative School–University Partnerships
- 43 What’s Needed Now
- 44 Commentary on Part VI: Inquiry and Innovation in School–University Partnerships
- Part VII Funding, Policy, and the Politics of School–University Partnerships
- Part VIII Looking at School–University Partnerships across Geographic and Cultural Borders
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter illuminates how the action research methodology is well-suited to tackle common problems within school–university partnerships (SUPs) and generate systems-level change. This innovation is described through the story of a collaborative action research study in a SUP induction program that resulted in systemic change to the school district and the university teacher preparation program. The purpose of the action research was to design, implement, and evaluate interventions that enhanced a school district’s induction program. Interventions included a virtual New Teacher Orientation during the COVID-19 pandemic that created school-based learning communities for 200 new teachers and a virtual professional learning community that built mentoring capacity among teacher leaders. The authors suggest that SUPs would benefit from engaging in action research that addresses systems level change and that SUPs should leverage action research to address complex common problems, such as teacher retention.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of School–University Partnerships , pp. 637 - 658Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Alim, H. S. & Paris, D. (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 497–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley-Marudas, M. F. M., Dutton, J., Ellenbogen, C., Huang, G. H. C., & Schwab, S. (2021). Exploring veteran teachers’ collaborative action research experiences through a school–university partnership: “Old dogs” try new tricks. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 22(1), 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, R. W. (2014). The new teacher educator: Preparing teacher educators for partnership work. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education in Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Burns, R. W., Haraf, S., Perrone-Britt, F., Porter, M., Bellas, A., Johnson, W., & Hailey-Brown, L. (2020). The influence of teacher leadership on elementary students in an urban Professional Development School (PDS). School–University Partnerships, 12(4), 67–85.Google Scholar
Cantatore, F., Crane, L. H., & Wilmoth, D. (2016). Defining clinical education: Parallels in practice. Australian Journal of Clinical Education, 1(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catelli, L. A. (2003). School-college partners: Action research and focus group findings on what is important in preparing quality teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association in Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Catelli, L. A. (2011). Response to Section III: What’s needed now. Teachers College Record, 113(14), 486–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catelli, L. A., & Carlino, J. (2001). Collaborative action research to assess student learning and effect change. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 5(1), 105–112.Google Scholar
Catelli, L. A., Costello, J., & Padovano, K. (2000). Action research in the context of a school–university partnership: Its value, problems, issues and benefits. Educational Action Research, 8(2), 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Cochran-Smith, M., & Villegas, A. M. (2015). Framing teacher preparation research: An overview of the field, part 1. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(1), 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2014). Doing action research in your own organization (4th ed.). Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dana, N. F., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2009). The reflective educator’s guide to classroom research: Learning to teach and teaching to learn through practitioner inquiry (2nd ed.). Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L. (2014). Strengthening clinical preparation: The holy grail of teacher education. Peabody Journal of Education, 89(4), 547–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dresden, J., Kittleson, J., & Wenner, J. (2014). Clinically rich practices in teacher education. In Ferrara, J., Nath, J., & Guadarrama, I. (Eds.), Creating visions for PDS partnerships (pp. 43–60). Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. (2005). Let’s get beyond community and practice: The many meanings of learning by participating. The Curriculum Journal, 16(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958517042000336809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.10.1111/0161-4681.00141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gecker, J. (2021, September 22). Covid-19 creates direct U.S. shortage of teachers, school staff. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/business-science-health-education-california-b6c495eab9a2a8f1a3ca068582c9d3c7.Google Scholar
Gilbertson, E. (2022). Cultivating community to support new teachers: Navigating complexity in a school–university partnership [Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia]. ProQuest.Google Scholar
Goodlad, J. I. (1988). School–university partnerships for educational renewal: Rationale and concepts. In Sirotnik, K. A. & Goodlad, J. I. (Eds.), School–university partnerships in action: Concepts, cases, and concerns (pp. 3–31). Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re‐imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunzicker, J. (2020). The impact of teacher leadership on student learning in Professional Development Schools (PDS): Action research is important. School–University Partnerships, 12(4), 1–9.Google Scholar
Ingersoll, R. M. (2012). Beginning teacher induction what the data tell us: Induction is an education reform whose time has come. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(8), 47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233.10.3102/0034654311403323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, J. & Burns, R.W. (2020). (Re)Designing programs: A vision for equity-centered clinically based teacher preparation. Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J., Yendol-Hoppey, D., & Dana, N.F. (2015). Preparing the next generation of teacher educators: The role of practitioner inquiry. Action in Teacher Education, 37(4), 373–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffries, R. B., & Nelson, S. (2020). Enacting equity through action research in Professional Development Schools (PDS). School–University Partnerships, 12(4), 153–160.Google Scholar
Johnston, M. (1997). Contradictions in collaboration: New thinking on school/university partnerships. Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Kirschner, B. W., Dickinson, R., & Blosser, C. (1996). From cooperation to collaboration: The changing culture of a school/university partnership. Theory into Practice, 35(3), 205–213.10.1080/00405849609543724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: a.k.a. the Remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84.10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (2008). Teachers in professional communities: Improving teaching and learning. Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Manfra, M. (2019). Action research and systematic, intentional change in teaching practice. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 163–196.10.3102/0091732X18821132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., & Kavanagh, S. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113493807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, H.R. (2020). Start where you are but don’t stay there: Understanding diversity, opportunity gaps, and teaching in today’s classrooms (2nd ed.). Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
National Association for Professional Development Schools (2008). What it means to be a Professional Development School. The Executive Council and Board of Directors.Google Scholar
National Association for Professional Development Schools (2021). What it means to be a Professional Development School: The nine essentials (2nd ed.). Author.Google Scholar
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (2010, November). Transforming teacher education through clinical practice: A national strategy to prepare effective teachers. Blue Ribbon Panel on Clinical Preparation and Partnerships for Improved Student Learning.Google Scholar
Nguyen, T., Pham, L., Springer, M., & Crouch, M. (2019). The factors of teacher attrition and retention: An updated and expanded meta-analysis of the literature. EdWorkingPaper No.19–149, 1–72. Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://edworkingpapers.com/ai19-149.Google Scholar
Noguera, P. (2003). City schools and the American dream: Reclaiming the promise of public education. Teacher College Press.Google Scholar
Perna, M. (2022, January 4). Why education is about to reach a crisis of epic proportions. Forbes. www.forbes.com/sites/markcperna/2022/01/04/why-education-is-about-to-reach-a-crisis-of-epic-proportions/?sh=a42a5cf78c7b.Google Scholar
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of action research: Concise paperback edition. Sage.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C., & Zenkov, K. (Eds.) (2015). Social justice, the Common Core, and closing the instructional gap: Empowering diverse learners and their teachers. Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Sandholtz, J. H., & Finan, E. C. (1998). Blurring the boundaries to promote school–university partnerships. Journal of Teacher Education, 49(1), 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlechty, P. C., & Whitford, B. L. (1988). Shared problems and shared vision: Organic collaboration. In Sirotnik, K. A. & Goodlad, J. I. (Eds.), School–University partnerships in action: Concepts, cases, and concerns (pp. 205–225). Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Smeets, K., & Ponte, P. (2009). Action research and teacher leadership. Professional development in education, 35(2), 175–193.10.1080/13674580802102102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somekh, B., & Zeichner, K. (2009). Action research for educational reform: Remodeling action research theories and practices in local contexts. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 5–21.10.1080/09650790802667402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanulis, R. N. (1995). Classroom teachers as mentors: Possibilities for participation in a professional development school context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(4), 331–344.10.1016/0742-051X(94)00035-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, E. D., & Woo, A. (2021). Job-related stress threatens the teacher supply: Key finding from the 2021 state of the US teacher survey. Technical Appendixes. Research Report. RR-A1108-1. RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Teitel, L. (2003). The Professional Development Schools handbook: Starting, sustaining and assessing partnerships that improve student learning. Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Tunks, J. L. (2011). Action research as primary vehicle for inquiry in the Professional Development School. Teachers College Record, 113(14), 463–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villegas, A. & Lucas, T. (2002). Educating culturally responsive teachers: A coherent approach. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Warren, M. R., & Goodman, D. (2018). Lift me up, don’t push me out: Voices from the front lines of the education justice movement. Beacon.Google Scholar
Yendol-Hoppey, D. & Franco, Y. (2014). In search of signature pedagogy for PDS teacher education: A review of articles published in school–university partnerships. School–University Partnerships, 7(1), 17–34.Google Scholar
Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college-and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeichner, K. (2019). Moving beyond, asset, equity, and justice-oriented teacher education. Teachers College Record, 121(6), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeichner, K. (2020). Preparing teachers as democratic professionals. Action in Teacher Education, 42(1), 38–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zenkov, K., Corrigan, D., Beebe, R., Sell, C., & Sells, S. (2013). Professional Development Schools (PDSs) and social justice education: Alternative notions of “quality” for future city teachers. School–University Partnerships, 6(1), 15–32.Google Scholar
Zenkov, K., Lague, M., & Azevedo, P. C. (2020). SEED, “Seeds,” “Stories of Injustice,” and the equity ideals of our partnerships: A program in formation and pre-/in-service teachers as bridges to equity. School–University Partnerships, 13(3), 5–21.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The PDF of this book
complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.