Language and Cognitive Plasticity and Processing

doi:10.1017/9781009202336.007

Part III - Language and Cognitive Plasticity and Processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 December 2025

Edited by

Edna Andrews and

Swathi Kiran

Show author details

Edna Andrews: Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Swathi Kiran: Affiliation:
Boston University

Book contents

Get access

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Language and Brain , pp. 97 - 236

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009202336.007 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abel, S., Weiller, C., Huber, W., Willmes, K., & Specht, K. (2015). Therapy-induced brain reorganization patterns in aphasia. Brain, 138, 1097–1112.10.1093/brain/awv022CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Abo, M., Senoo, A., Watanabe, S., Miyano, S., Doseki, K., Sasaki, N., Kobayashi, K., Kikuchi, Y., & Yonemoto, K. (2004). Language-related brain function during word repetition in post-stroke aphasics. Neuroreport, 15(12), 1891–1894.10.1097/00001756-200408260-00011CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Albert, M. L., Sparks, R. W., & Helm, N. A. (1973). Melodic intonation therapy for aphasia. Archives of Neurology, 29(2), 130–131.10.1001/archneur.1973.00490260074018CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baliki, M. N., Babbitt, E. M., & Cherney, L. R. (2018). Brain network topology influences response to intensive comprehensive aphasia treatment. Neurorehabilitation, 43(1), 63–76.10.3233/NRE-182428CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bitan, T., Simic, T., Saverino, C., Jones, C., Glazer, J., Collela, B., Wiseman-Hakes, C., Green, R., & Rochon, E. (2018). Changes in resting-state connectivity following melody-based therapy in a patient with aphasia. Neural Plasticity, 2018, 13.10.1155/2018/6214095CrossRef Google Scholar

Callan, D. E., Tsytsarev, V., Hanakawa, T., Callan, A. M., Katsuhara, M., Fukuyama, H., & Turner, R. (2006). Song and speech: Brain regions involved with perception and covert production. Neuroimage, 31(3), 1327–1342.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.036CrossRef Google Scholar

Chan, M. Y., Park, D. C., Savalia, N. K., Petersen, S. E., & Wig, G. S. (2014). Decreased segregation of brain systems across the healthy adult lifespan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(46), E4997–E5006.10.1073/pnas.1415122111CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Chu, R., Meltzer, J. A., & Bitan, T. (2018). Interhemispheric interactions during sentence comprehension in patients with aphasia. Cortex, 109, 74–91.10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.022CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cohen, J. R., & D’Esposito, M. (2016). The segregation and integration of distinct brain networks and their relationship to cognition. Journal of Neuroscience, 36(48), 12083–12094.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2965-15.2016CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Deco, G., Jirsa, V. K., & McIntosh, A. R. (2011). Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12(1), 43–56.10.1038/nrn2961CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Duncan, E. S., & Small, S. L. (2018). Changes in dynamic resting state network connectivity following aphasia therapy. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 12(4), 1141–1149.10.1007/s11682-017-9771-2CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Durand, E., Masson-Trottier, M., Sontheimer, A., & Ansaldo, A. I. (2021). Increased links between language and motor areas: A proof-of-concept study on resting-state functional connectivity following personalized observation, execution and mental imagery therapy in chronic aphasia. Brain and Cognition, 148.10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105659CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fedorenko, E., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2014). Reworking the language network. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(3), 120–126.10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.006CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fridriksson, J. (2010). Preservation and modulation of specific left hemisphere regions is vital for treated recovery from anomia in stroke. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(35), 11558–11564.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2227-10.2010CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fridriksson, J., Baker, J. M., & Moser, D. (2009). Cortical mapping of naming errors in aphasia. Human Brain Mapping, 30(8), 2487–2498.10.1002/hbm.20683CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W. (2003). Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage, 19(4), 1273–1302.10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00202-7CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Geranmayeh, F., Leech, R., & Wise, R. J. S. (2016). Network dysfunction predicts speech production after left hemisphere stroke. Neurology, 86(14), 1296.10.1212/WNL.0000000000002537CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gili, T., Fiori, V., De Pasquale, G., Sabatini, U., Caltagirone, C., & P. Marangolo, P. (2017). Right sensory-motor functional networks subserve action observation therapy in aphasia. Brain Imaging Behav, 11(5), 1397–1411.10.1007/s11682-016-9635-1CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Harvey, D. Y., Wei, T., Ellmore, T. M., Hamilton, A. C., & Schnur, T. T. (2013). Neuropsychological evidence for the functional role of the uncinate fasciculus in semantic control. Neuropsychologia, 51(5), 789–801.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.01.028CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Heiss, W. D., Karbe, H., WeberLuxenburger, G., Herholz, K., Kessler, J., Pietrzyk, U., & Pawlik, G. (1997). Speech-induced cerebral metabolic activation reflects recovery from aphasia. Journal of Neuroscience, 145(2), 213–217.Google Scholar PubMed

Heiss, W. D., Thiel, A., Kessler, J., & Herholz, K. (2003). Disturbance and recovery of language function: Correlates in PET activation studies. Neuroimage, 20, Supplement 1, S42–S49.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.005CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hope, T. M. H., Leff, A. P., & Price, C. J. (2018). Predicting language outcomes after stroke: Is structural disconnection a useful predictor? Neuroimage-Clinical, 19, 22–29.10.1016/j.nicl.2018.03.037CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Johnson, J. P., Meier, E. L., Pan, Y., & Kiran, S. (2020). Pre-treatment graph measures of a functional semantic network are associated with naming therapy outcomes in chronic aphasia. Brain and Language, 207.10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104809CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Johnson, J. P., Meier, E. L., Pan, Y., & Kiran, S. (2021). Abnormally weak functional connections get stronger in chronic stroke patients who benefit from naming therapy. Brain and Language, 223.10.1016/j.bandl.2021.105042CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Keator, L. M., Yourganov, G., Basilakos, A., Hillis, A. E., Hickok, G., Bonilha, L., Rorden, C., & Fridriksson, J. (2021). Independent contributions of structural and functional connectivity: Evidence from a stroke model. Network Neuroscience, 5(4), 911–928.10.1162/netn_a_00207CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Klingbeil, J., Wawrzyniak, M., Stockert, A., & Saur, D. (2019). Resting-state functional connectivity: An emerging method for the study of language networks in post-stroke aphasia. Brain and Cognition, 131, 22–33.10.1016/j.bandc.2017.08.005CrossRef Google Scholar

Marcotte, K., Perlbarg, V., Marrelec, G., Benali, H., & Ansaldo, A. I. (2013). Default-mode network functional connectivity in aphasia: Therapy-induced neuroplasticity. Brain and Language, 124(1), 45–55.10.1016/j.bandl.2012.11.004CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Masson-Trottier, M., Sontheimer, A., Durand, E., & Ansaldo, A. I. (2021). Resting-state functional connectivity following phonological component analysis: The combined action of phonology and visual orthographic cues.” Brain sciences, 11(11), 1458.10.3390/brainsci11111458CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Meier, E. L., Johnson, J. P., & Kiran, S. (2018). Left frontotemporal effective connectivity during semantic feature judgments in patients with chronic aphasia and age-matched healthy controls. Cortex, 108, 173–192.10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.006CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Meier, E. L., Johnson, J. P, Pan, Y. & Kiran, S. (2019). “A lesion and connectivity-based hierarchical model of chronic aphasia recovery dissociates patients and healthy controls.” Neuroimage-Clinical, 23.10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101919CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Meltzer, J. A., Wagage, S., Ryder, J., Solomon, B., & Braun, A. R. (2013). Adaptive significance of right hemisphere activation in aphasic language comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 51(7), 1248–1259.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.03.007CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Naeser, M. A., Martin, P. I., Baker, E. H., Hodge, S. M., Sczerzenie, S. E., Nicholas, M., Palumbo, C. L., Goodglass, H., Wingfield, A., Samaraweera, R., Harris, G., Baird, A., Renshaw, P., & Yurgelun-Todd, D. (2004). Overt propositional speech in chronic nonfluent aphasia studied with the dynamic susceptibility contrast fMRI method. Neuroimage, 22(1), 29–41.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.016CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

New, A. B., Robin, D. A., Parkinson, A. L., Duffy, J. R., McNeil, M. R., O. Piguet, O., Hornberger, M., Price, C. J., Eickhoff, S. B., & Ballard, K. J. (2015). Altered resting-state network connectivity in stroke patients with and without apraxia of speech. NeuroImage: Clinical, 8, 429–439.10.1016/j.nicl.2015.03.013CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Postman-Caucheteux, W. A., Birn, R. M., Pursley, R. H., Butman, J. A., Solomon, J. M., Picchioni, D., McArdle, J., & Braun, A. R. (2010). Single-trial fMRI shows contralesional activity linked to overt naming errors in chronic aphasic patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(6), 1299–1318.10.1162/jocn.2009.21261CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Price, C. J., & Crinion, J. (2005). The latest on functional imaging studies of aphasic stroke. Current Opinion in Neurology, 18(4), 429–434.10.1097/01.wco.0000168081.76859.c1CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sandberg, C. W. (2017). Hypoconnectivity of resting-state networks in persons with aphasia compared with healthy age-matched adults. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11.10.3389/fnhum.2017.00091CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Saur, D., Lange, R., Baumgaertner, A., Schraknepper, V., Willmes, K., Rijntjes, M., & Weiller, C. (2006). Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke. Brain, 129(6), 1371–1384.10.1093/brain/awl090CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Siegel, J. S., Ramsey, L. E., Snyder, A. Z., Metcalf, N. V., Chacko, R. V., Weinberger, K., Baldassarre, A., Hacker, C. D., Shulman, G. L., & Corbetta, M. (2016). Disruptions of network connectivity predict impairment in multiple behavioral domains after stroke. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(30), E4367–E4376.10.1073/pnas.1521083113CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Siegel, J. S., Seitzman, B. A., Ramsey, L. E., Ortega, M., Gordon, E. M., Dosenbach, N. U. F., Petersen, S. E., Shulman, G. L., & Corbetta, M. (2018). Re-emergence of modular brain networks in stroke recovery. Cortex, 101, 44–59.10.1016/j.cortex.2017.12.019CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sparks, R., Helm, N., & Albert, M. (1974). Aphasia rehabilitation resulting from melodic intonation therapy. Cortex, 10(4), 303–316.10.1016/S0010-9452(74)80024-9CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Thiel, A., Herholz, K., Koyuncu, A., Ghaemi, M., Kracht, L. W., Habedank, B., & Heiss, W. D. (2001). Plasticity of language networks in patients with brain tumors: A positron emission tomography activation study. Annals of Neurology, 50(5), 620–629.10.1002/ana.1253CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Tinaz, S., Lauro, P., Hallett, M., & Horovitz, S. G. (2016). Deficits in task-set maintenance and execution networks in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Structure and Function, 221(3), 1413–1425.10.1007/s00429-014-0981-8CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Truzman, T., Rochon, E., Meltzer, J., Leonard, C., & Bitan, T. (2021). Simultaneous normalization and compensatory changes in right hemisphere connectivity during aphasia therapy. Brain Sciences, 11(10), 1330.10.3390/brainsci11101330CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

van Hees, S., McMahon, K., Angwin, A., de Zubicaray, G., Read, S., & Copland, D. A. (2014). A functional MRI study of the relationship between naming treatment outcomes and resting state functional connectivity in post-stroke aphasia. Human Brain Mapping, 35(8), 3919–3931.10.1002/hbm.22448CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wilson, S. M., Eriksson, D. K., Yen, M., Demarco, A. T., Schneck, S. M., & Lucanie, J. M. (2019). Language mapping in aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(11), 3937–3946.10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-RSNP-19-0031CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Xu, L., Huang, L., Cui, W., & Yu, Q. (2020). Reorganized functional connectivity of language centers as a possible compensatory mechanism for basal ganglia aphasia. Brain Injury, 34(3), 430–437.10.1080/02699052.2020.1716995CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Yang, H. Q., Bai, L., Zhou, Y., Kang, S., Liang, P. P., Wang, L. H., & Zhu, Y. F. (2017). Increased inter-hemispheric resting-state functional connectivity in acute lacunar stroke patients with aphasia. Experimental Brain Research, 235(3), 941–948.10.1007/s00221-016-4851-xCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Zhang, C., Xia, Y. Y., Feng, T., Yu, K., Zhang, H. Y., Sami, M. U., Xiang, J., & Xu, K. (2021). Disrupted functional connectivity within and between resting-state networks in the subacute stage of post-stroke aphasia. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15.10.3389/fnins.2021.746264CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Zhu, D., Chang, J., Freeman, S., Tan, Z., Xiao, J., Gao, Y., & Kong, J. (2014). Changes of functional connectivity in the left frontoparietal network following aphasic stroke. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8.10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00167CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Zhu, L., Fan, Y., Zou, Q., Wang, J., Gao, J.-H., & Niu, Z. (2014). Temporal reliability and lateralization of the resting-state language network. PLoS ONE, 9(1).Google Scholar PubMed

References

Alyahya, R. S. W., Halai, A. D., Conroy, P., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2018). Noun and verb processing in aphasia: Behavioural profiles and neural correlates. NeuroImage: Clinical, 18, 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.01.023 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Alyahya, R. S. W., Halai, A. D., Conroy, P., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2020). A unified model of post-stroke language deficits including discourse production and their neural correlates. Brain, 143(5), 1541–1554. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa074 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Berndt, R. S., Haendiges, A. N., Mitchum, C. C., & Sandson, J. (1997). Verb retrieval in aphasia. 2. Relationship to sentence processing. Brain and Language, 56(1), 107–137. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1728 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Berndt, R. S., Mitchum, C. C., & Haendiges, A. N. (1996). Comprehension of reversible sentences in “agrammatism”: A meta-analysis. Cognition, 58(3), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00682-6 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Binder, J. R. (2016). Phoneme perception. In Neurobiology of Language (pp. 447–461). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407794-2.00037-7 CrossRef Google Scholar

Binder, J. R., & Desai, R. H. (2011). The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 527–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.10.001 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19(12), 2767–2796. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp055 CrossRef Google Scholar

Bird, H., Howard, D., & Franklin, S. (2003). Verbs and nouns: The importance of being imageable. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16(2–3), 113–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0911-6044(02)00016-7 CrossRef Google Scholar

Blumstein, S. E. (2016). Psycholinguistic approaches to the study of syndromes and symptoms of aphasia. In Neurobiology of Language (pp. 923–933). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407794-2.00074-2 CrossRef Google Scholar

Bolhuis, J. J., Tattersall, I., Chomsky, N., & Berwick, R. C. (2014). How could language have evolved?PLoS Biology, 12(8), e1001934. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001934 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Pezzulo, G., & Tummolini, L. (2019). Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts. Physics of Life Reviews, 29, 120–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2018.12.001 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Breier, J. I., Hasan, K. M., Zhang, W., Men, D., & Papanicolaou, A. C. (2008). Language dysfunction after stroke and damage to white matter tracts evaluated using diffusion tensor imaging. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 29(3), 483–487. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0846 CrossRef Google Scholar

Breier, J. I., Juranek, J., & Papanicolaou, A. C. (2011). Changes in maps of language function and the integrity of the arcuate fasciculus after therapy for chronic aphasia. Neurocase, 17(6), 506–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554794.2010.547505 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Broca, P. (1861). Nouvelle observation d’aphémie produite par une lésion de la moitié postérieure des deuxième et troisième circonvolution frontales gauches. Bull Soc Anat Paris, 36, 398–407.Google Scholar

Bucur, M., & Papagno, C. (2021). An ALE meta-analytical review of the neural correlates of abstract and concrete words. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 15727. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94506-9 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Butler, R. A., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Woollams, A. M. (2014). Capturing multidimensionality in stroke aphasia: Mapping principal behavioural components to neural structures. Brain, 137(12), 3248–3266. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awu286 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Caplan, D. (1993). Toward a psycholinguistic approach to acquired neurogenic language disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2(1), 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360.0201.59 CrossRef Google Scholar

Caplan, D. (2015). The neural basis of syntatic processing. In Hillis, A. E. (Ed.), The Handbook of Adult Language Disorders (2nd ed., pp. 355–374). Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Caplan, D., & Hanna, J. E. (1998). Sentence production by aphasic patients in a constrained task. Brain and Language, 63(2), 184–218. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1998.1930 CrossRef Google Scholar

Caplan, D., Michaud, J., & Hufford, R. (2013). Short-term memory, working memory, and syntactic comprehension in aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 30(2), 77–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2013.803958 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001788 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Caramazza, A., & Shelton, J. R. (1998). Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892998563752 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. B. (1976). Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 3(4), 572–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(76)90048-1 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Catani, M., & ffytche, D. H. (2005). The rises and falls of disconnection syndromes. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 128(Pt 10), 2224–2239. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh622 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.234 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Chapman, C. A., Hasan, O., Schulz, P. E., & Martin, R. C. (2020). Evaluating the distinction between semantic knowledge and semantic access: Evidence from semantic dementia and comprehension-impaired stroke aphasia. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(4), 607–639. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01706-6 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Charidimou, A., Kasselimis, D., Varkanitsa, M., Selai, C., Potagas, C., & Evdokimidis, I. (2014). Why is it difficult to predict language impairment and outcome in patients with aphasia after stroke? Journal of Clinical Neurology, 10(2), 75. https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2014.10.2.75 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cloutman, L., Gottesman, R., Chaudhry, P., Davis, C., Kleinman, J. T., Pawlak, M., Herskovits, E. H., Kannan, V., Lee, A., Newhart, M., Heidler-Gary, J., & Hillis, A. E. (2009). Where (in the brain) do semantic errors come from?Cortex, 45(5), 641–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2008.05.013 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407 CrossRef Google Scholar

Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204 CrossRef Google Scholar

Conca, F., Borsa, V. M., Cappa, S. F., & Catricalà, E. (2021). The multidimensionality of abstract concepts: A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 127, 474–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.05.004 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

DeLeon, J., Gottesman, R. F., Kleinman, J. T., Newhart, M., Davis, C., Heidler-Gary, J., Lee, A., & Hillis, A. E. (2007). Neural regions essential for distinct cognitive processes underlying picture naming. Brain, 130(5), 1408–1422. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm011 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dell, G. S., & O’Seaghdha, P. G. (1992). Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition, 42(1–3), 287–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90046-K CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104(4), 801–838.10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Nozari, N., Faseyitan, O., & Branch Coslett, H. (2013). Voxel-based lesion-parameter mapping: Identifying the neural correlates of a computational model of word production. Cognition, 128(3), 380–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.05.007 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

den Ouden, D. B., Malyutina, S., Basilakos, A., Bonilha, L., Gleichgerrcht, E., Yourganov, G., Hillis, A. E., Hickok, G., Rorden, C., & Fridriksson, J. (2019). Cortical and structural‐connectivity damage correlated with impaired syntactic processing in aphasia. Human Brain Mapping, 40(7), 2153–2173. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24514 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Desai, R. H., Reilly, M., & van Dam, W. (2018). The multifaceted abstract brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170122. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0122 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Devinsky, O. (2009). Norman Geschwind: Influence on his career and comments on his course on the neurology of behavior. Epilepsy & Behavior, 15(4), 413–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.04.029 CrossRef Google Scholar

Diveica, V., Koldewyn, K., & Binney, R. J. (2021). Establishing a role of the semantic control network in social cognitive processing: A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. NeuroImage, 245, 118702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118702 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dronkers, N. F., Plaisant, O., Iba-Zizen, M. T., & Cabanis, E. A. (2007). Paul Broca’s historic cases: High resolution MR imaging of the brains of Leborgne and Lelong. Brain, 130(5), 1432–1441. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm042 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Duncan, J. (2010). The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: Mental programs for intelligent behaviour. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(4), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.004 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ellis, A. W., & Young, A. W. (1988). Human Cognitive Neuropsychology. L. Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar

Fedorenko, E., Behr, M. K., & Kanwisher, N. (2011). Functional specificity for high-level linguistic processing in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(39), 16428–16433. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112937108 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fedorenko, E., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2014). Reworking the language network. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(3), 120–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.006 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fodor, J. A. (1975). The Language of Thought (Digit. repr). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Fridriksson, J., Bonilha, L., & Rorden, C. (2007). Severe Broca’s aphasia without Broca’s area damage. Behavioural Neurology, 18(4), 237–238. https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/785280 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fridriksson, J., den Ouden, D.-B., Hillis, A. E., Hickok, G., Rorden, C., Basilakos, A., Yourganov, G., & Bonilha, L. (2018). Anatomy of aphasia revisited. Brain, 141(3), 848–862. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx363 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fridriksson, J., Kjartansson, O., Morgan, P. S., Hjaltason, H., Magnusdottir, S., Bonilha, L., & Rorden, C. (2010). Impaired speech repetition and left parietal lobe damage. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(33), 11057–11061. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1120-10.2010 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Friederici, A. D. (2011). The brain basis of language processing: From structure to function. Physiological Reviews, 91(4), 1357–1392. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00006.2011 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Friederici, A. D., Chomsky, N., Berwick, R. C., Moro, A., & Bolhuis, J. J. (2017). Language, mind and brain. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(10), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0184-4 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Friederici, A. D., & Gierhan, S. M. (2013). The language network. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 23(2), 250–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2012.10.002 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gainotti, G. (2010). The influence of anatomical locus of lesion and of gender-related familiarity factors in category-specific semantic disorders for animals, fruits and vegetables: A review of single-case studies. Cortex, 46(9), 1072–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2010.04.002 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Garrett, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 9, pp. 133–177). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60270-4 Google Scholar

Geschwind, N. (1965a). Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. Part I. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 88(2), 237–294. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/88.2.237 CrossRef Google Scholar

Geschwind, N. (1965b). Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. Part II. Brain, 88(3), 585–585. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/88.3.585 CrossRef Google Scholar

Geschwind, N. (1970). The organization of language and the brain. Science (New York, N.Y.), 170(3961), 940–944. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.170.3961.940 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Geva, S., Correia, M. M., & Warburton, E. A. (2015). Contributions of bilateral white matter to chronic aphasia symptoms as assessed by diffusion tensor MRI. Brain and Language, 150, 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2015.09.001 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gibson, E. (2000). The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. Image, Language, Brain: Papers from the First Mind Articulation Project Symposium., 94–126.Google Scholar

Gibson, E., Sandberg, C., Fedorenko, E., Bergen, L., & Kiran, S. (2016). A rational inference approach to aphasic language comprehension. Aphasiology, 30(11), 1341–1360. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1111994 CrossRef Google Scholar

Gleichgerrcht, E., Roth, R., Fridriksson, J., den Ouden, D., Delgaizo, J., Stark, B., Hickok, G., Rorden, C., Wilmskoetter, J., Hillis, A., & Bonilha, L. (2021). Neural bases of elements of syntax during speech production in patients with aphasia. Brain and Language, 222, 105025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2021.105025 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Hillis, A. E., Weintraub, S., Kertesz, A., Mendez, M., Cappa, S. F., Ogar, J. M., Rohrer, J. D., Black, S., Boeve, B. F., Manes, F., Dronkers, N. F., Vandenberghe, R., Rascovsky, K., Patterson, K., Miller, B. L., Knopman, D. S., Hodges, J. R., Mesulam, M. M., & Grossman, M. (2011). Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology, 76(11), 1006–1014. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821103e6 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Grodzinsky, Y. (1995). A restrictive theory of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language, 50(1), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1995.1039 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hagoort, P. (2013). MUC (memory, unification, control) and beyond. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00416 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Halai, A. D., Woollams, A. M., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2017). Using principal component analysis to capture individual differences within a unified neuropsychological model of chronic post-stroke aphasia: Revealing the unique neural correlates of speech fluency, phonology and semantics. Cortex, 86, 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.016 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Halai, A. D., Woollams, A. M., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2018). Predicting the pattern and severity of chronic post-stroke language deficits from functionally-partitioned structural lesions. NeuroImage: Clinical, 19, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.03.011 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Han, Z., Ma, Y., Gong, G., He, Y., Caramazza, A., & Bi, Y. (2013). White matter structural connectivity underlying semantic processing: Evidence from brain damaged patients. Brain, 136(10), 2952–2965. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt205 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Henseler, I., Regenbrecht, F., & Obrig, H. (2014). Lesion correlates of patholinguistic profiles in chronic aphasia: Comparisons of syndrome-, modality- and symptom-level assessment. Brain, 137(3), 918–930. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt374 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2004). Dorsal and ventral streams: A framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition, 92(1–2), 67–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.011 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007). The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(5), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2113 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hillis, A. E., & Caramazza, A. (1995). Representation of grammatical categories of words in the brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(3), 396–407. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1995.7.3.396 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hillis, A. E., & Heidler, J. (2002). Mechanisms of early aphasia recovery. Aphasiology, 16(9), 885–895. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268703 CrossRef Google Scholar

Hillis, A. E., Kane, A., Tuffiash, E., Ulatowski, J. A., Barker, P. B., Beauchamp, N. J., & Wityk, R. J. (2001). Reperfusion of specific brain regions by raising blood pressure restores selective language functions in subacute stroke. Brain and Language, 79(3), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2563 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hillis, A. E., Kleinman, J. T., Newhart, M., Heidler-Gary, J., Gottesman, R., Barker, P. B., Aldrich, E., Llinas, R., Wityk, R., & Chaudhry, P. (2006). Restoring cerebral blood flow reveals neural regions critical for naming. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(31), 8069–8073. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2088-06.2006 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hillis, A. E., Wityk, R. J., Tuffiash, E., Beauchamp, N. J., Jacobs, M. A., Barker, P. B., & Selnes, O. A. (2001). Hypoperfusion of Wernicke’s area predicts severity of semantic deficit in acute stroke. Annals of Neurology, 50(5), 561–566. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.1265 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hodgson, V. J., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Jackson, R. L. (2021). Multiple dimensions underlying the functional organization of the language network. NeuroImage, 241, 118444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118444 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hoffman, P., Binney, R. J., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2015). Differing contributions of inferior prefrontal and anterior temporal cortex to concrete and abstract conceptual knowledge. Cortex, 63, 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.09.001 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hoffman, P., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2011). Reverse concreteness effects are not a typical feature of semantic dementia: Evidence for the hub-and-spoke model of conceptual representation. Cerebral Cortex, 21(9), 2103–2112. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq288 CrossRef Google Scholar

Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92(1–2), 101–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ivanova, M. V., Isaev, D. Yu., Dragoy, O. V., Akinina, Y. S., Petrushevskiy, A. G., Fedina, O. N., Shklovsky, V. M., & Dronkers, N. F. (2016). Diffusion-tensor imaging of major white matter tracts and their role in language processing in aphasia. Cortex, 85, 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.019 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Jefferies, E., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2006). Semantic impairment in stroke aphasia versus semantic dementia: A case-series comparison. Brain, 129(8), 2132–2147. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl153 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kasselimis, D. S., Simos, P. G., Peppas, C., Evdokimidis, I., & Potagas, C. (2017). The unbridged gap between clinical diagnosis and contemporary research on aphasia: A short discussion on the validity and clinical utility of taxonomic categories. Brain and Language, 164, 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.10.005 CrossRef Google Scholar

Kemmerer, D. (2014). Word classes in the brain: Implications of linguistic typology for cognitive neuroscience. Cortex, 58, 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.05.004 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kemmerer, D. (2022). Cognitive Neuroscience of Language (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781138318427 CrossRef Google Scholar

Kolk, H. (1995). A time-based approach to agrammatic production. Brain and Language, 50(3), 282–303. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1995.1049 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kolk, H. H. J., & Van Grunsven, M. M. F. (1985). Agrammatism as a variable phenomenon. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2(4), 347–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643298508252666 CrossRef Google Scholar

Kummerer, D., Hartwigsen, G., Kellmeyer, P., Glauche, V., Mader, I., Klöppel, S., Suchan, J., Karnath, H.-O., Weiller, C., & Saur, D. (2013). Damage to ventral and dorsal language pathways in acute aphasia. Brain, 136(2), 619–629. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws354 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lacey, E. H., Skipper-Kallal, L. M., Xing, S., Fama, M. E., & Turkeltaub, P. E. (2017). Mapping common aphasia assessments to underlying cognitive processes and their neural substrates. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 31(5), 442–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968316688797 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lambon Ralph, M. A., Jefferies, E., Patterson, K., & Rogers, T. T. (2017). The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.150 CrossRef Google Scholar

Landrigan, J.-F., Zhang, F., & Mirman, D. (2021). A data-driven approach to post-stroke aphasia classification and lesion-based prediction. Brain, awab010. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awab010 CrossRef Google Scholar

Levelt, W. (2012). A History of Psycholinguistics: The Pre-Chomskyan Era. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199653669.001.0001 CrossRef Google Scholar

Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation (pp. xiv, 566). The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6393.003.0003CrossRef Google Scholar

Lichtheim, L. (1885). On aphasia. Brain, 7, 433–484. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6393.001.0001 CrossRef Google Scholar

Linebarger, M. C., Schwartz, M. F., & Saffran, E. M. (1983). Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics. Cognition, 13(3), 361–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90015-X CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lohndal, T. (2014). Introduction. In Lohndal, T., Phrase Structure and Argument Structure (1st ed., pp. 1–21). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677115.003.0001 CrossRef Google Scholar

Lorca-Puls, D. L., Gajardo-Vidal, A., White, J., Seghier, M. L., Leff, A. P., Green, D. W., Crinion, J. T., Ludersdorfer, P., Hope, T. M. H., Bowman, H., & Price, C. J. (2018). The impact of sample size on the reproducibility of voxel-based lesion-deficit mappings. Neuropsychologia, 115, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.014 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Love, T., & Oster, E. (2002). On the categorization of aphasic typologies: The SOAP (a test of syntactic complexity). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(5), 503–529. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021208903394 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lwi, S. J., Herron, T. J., Curran, B. C., Ivanova, M. V., Schendel, K., Dronkers, N. F., & Baldo, J. V. (2021). Auditory comprehension deficits in post-stroke aphasia: Neurologic and demographic correlates of outcome and recovery. Frontiers in Neurology, 12, 680248. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.680248 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Madden, E., Kendall, D., & Riley, E. (2022). Acquired disorders of reading: Modeling, assessment, and treatment. In Papathanasiou, I. & Coppens, P. (Eds.), Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorders (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.Google Scholar

Magnusdottir, S., Fillmore, P., den Ouden, D. B., Hjaltason, H., Rorden, C., Kjartansson, O., Bonilha, L., & Fridriksson, J. (2013). Damage to left anterior temporal cortex predicts impairment of complex syntactic processing: A lesion-symptom mapping study. Human Brain Mapping, 34(10), 2715–2723. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22096 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2009). Concepts and categories: A cognitive neuropsychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163532 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2011). What drives the organization of object knowledge in the brain?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(3), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.004 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Martin, N. (2022). Disorders of word production. In Papathanasiou, I. & Coppens, P. (Eds.), Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorders (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.Google Scholar

Martin, R. C., & Romani, C. (1994). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension: A multiple-components view. Neuropsychology, 8(4), 506.10.1037/0894-4105.8.4.506CrossRef Google Scholar

Matchin, W., & Hickok, G. (2020). The cortical organization of syntax. Cerebral Cortex, 30(3), 1481–1498. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhz180 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

McNeil, M. R., & Pratt, S. R. (2001). Defining aphasia: Some theoretical and clinical implications of operating from a formal definition. Aphasiology, 15(10–11), 901–911. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687040143000276 CrossRef Google Scholar

Meier, E. L., Sheppard, S. M., Goldberg, E. B., Kelly, C. R., Walker, A., Ubellacker, D. M., Vitti, E., Ruch, K., & Hillis, A. E. (2021). Dysfunctional tissue correlates of unrelated naming errors in acute left hemisphere stroke. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2021.1980593 Google Scholar

Mirman, D., Chen, Q., Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., Faseyitan, O. K., Coslett, H. B., & Schwartz, M. F. (2015). Neural organization of spoken language revealed by lesion-symptom mapping. Nature Communications, 6, 6762. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7762 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mirman, D., Landrigan, J.-F., & Britt, A. E. (2017). Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems. Psychological Bulletin, 143(5), 499–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000092 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mirman, D., Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., Coslett, H. B., & Schwartz, M. F. (2015). The ins and outs of meaning: Behavioral and neuroanatomical dissociation of semantically-driven word retrieval and multimodal semantic recognition in aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 76, 208–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.014 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Miyake, A., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1994). A capacity approach to syntactic comprehension disorders: Making normal adults perform like aphasic patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11(6), 671–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643299408251989 CrossRef Google Scholar

Mohr, J. P., Pessin, M. S., Finkelstein, S., Funkenstein, H. H., Duncan, G. W., & Davis, K. R. (1978). Broca aphasia: Pathologic and clinical. Neurology, 28(4), 311–311. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.28.4.311 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Noonan, K. A., Jefferies, E., Visser, M., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2013). Going beyond inferior prefrontal involvement in semantic control: Evidence for the additional contribution of dorsal angular gyrus and posterior middle temporal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(11), 1824–1850. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00442 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Norris, D., & McQueen, J. M. (2008). Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychological Review, 115(2), 357–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.357 CrossRef Google Scholar

Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2005). Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(3), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.5.3.263 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ostrin, R. K., & Schwartz, M. F. (1986). Reconstructing from a degraded trace: A study of sentence repetition in agrammatism. Brain and Language, 28(2), 328–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(86)90109-4 CrossRef Google Scholar

Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and language. In Imagery (pp. 7–32). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-635450-8.50008-X CrossRef Google Scholar

Pillay, S. B., Stengel, B. C., Humphries, C., Book, D. S., & Binder, J. R. (2014). Cerebral localization of impaired phonological retrieval during rhyme judgment. Annals of Neurology, 76(5), 738–746. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24266 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Riccardi, N., Yourganov, G., Rorden, C., Fridriksson, J., & Desai, R. (2020). Degradation of praxis brain networks and impaired comprehension of manipulable nouns in stroke. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(3), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01495 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rogalsky, C., Pitz, E., Hillis, A. E., & Hickok, G. (2008). Auditory word comprehension impairment in acute stroke: Relative contribution of phonemic versus semantic factors. Brain and Language, 107(2), 167–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2008.08.003 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rolheiser, T., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2011). Dynamic processing in the human language system: Synergy between the arcuate fascicle and extreme capsule. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(47), 16949–16957. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2725-11.2011 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Saffran, E. M., & Martin, N. (1990). 16. Short-term memory impairment and sentence processing: A case study. Neuropsychological Impairments of Short-Term Memory, 428. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665547.021 CrossRef Google Scholar

Saffran, E. M., Schwartz, M. F., & Marin, O. S. (1980). The word order problem in agrammatism: II. Production. Brain and Language, 10(2), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(80)90056-5 CrossRef Google Scholar

Sandberg, C. W., & Kiran, S. (2014). Analysis of abstract and concrete word processing in persons with aphasia and age-matched neurologically healthy adults using fMRI. Neurocase, 20(4), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554794.2013.770881 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schumacher, R., Halai, A. D., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2019). Assessing and mapping language, attention and executive multidimensional deficits in stroke aphasia. Brain, 142(10), 3202–3216. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awz258 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1983). Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(1), 82–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.9.1.82 Google Scholar

Schwartz, M. F. (1984). What the classical aphasia categories can’t do for us, and why. Brain and Language, 21(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(84)90031-2 CrossRef Google Scholar

Schwartz, M. F., Faseyitan, O., Kim, J., & Coslett, H. B. (2012). The dorsal stream contribution to phonological retrieval in object naming. Brain, 135(12), 3799–3814. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws300 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schwartz, M. F., Kimberg, D. Y., Walker, G. M., Faseyitan, O., Brecher, A., Dell, G. S., & Coslett, H. B. (2009). Anterior temporal involvement in semantic word retrieval: Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping evidence from aphasia. Brain, 132(12), 3411–3427. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awp284 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schwartz, M. F., Saffran, E. M., & Marin, O. S. M. (1980). The word order problem in agrammatism. Brain and Language, 10(2), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(80)90055-3 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Shain, C., Blank, I. A., Fedorenko, E., Gibson, E., & Schuler, W. (2021). Robust effects of working memory demand during naturalistic language comprehension in language-selective cortex [Preprint]. Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.18.460917 CrossRef Google Scholar

Sheppard, S. M., Meier, E. L., Kim, K. T., Breining, B. L., Keator, L. M., Tang, B., Caffo, B. S., & Hillis, A. E. (2022). Neural correlates of syntactic comprehension: A longitudinal study. Brain and Language, 225, 105068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2021.105068 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Thompson, C. K. (2003). Unaccusative verb production in agrammatic aphasia: The argument structure complexity hypothesis. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16(2–3), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0911-6044(02)00014-3 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Thothathiri, M., Kimberg, D. Y., & Schwartz, M. F. (2012). The Neural basis of reversible sentence comprehension: Evidence from voxel-based lesion symptom mapping in aphasia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(1), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00118 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Tremblay, P., & Dick, A. S. (2016). Broca and Wernicke are dead, or moving past the classic model of language neurobiology. Brain and Language, 162, 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.08.004 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Troche, J., Crutch, S., & Reilly, J. (2014). Clustering, hierarchical organization, and the topography of abstract and concrete nouns. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00360 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Tsapkini, K., Jarema, G., & Kehayia, E. (2002). A morphological processing deficit in verbs but not in nouns: A case study in a highly inflected language. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 15(3–5), 265–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0911-6044(01)00039-2 CrossRef Google Scholar

Ullman, M. T. (2013). The role of declarative and procedural memory in disorders of language. Linguistic Variation, 13(2), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.13.2.01ull CrossRef Google Scholar

Varkanitsa, M., & Caplan, D. (2018). On the association between memory capacity and sentence comprehension: Insights from a systematic review and meta-analysis of the aphasia literature. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 48, 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.03.003 CrossRef Google Scholar

Walenski, M., Europa, E., Caplan, D., & Thompson, C. K. (2019). Neural networks for sentence comprehension and production: An ALE‐based meta‐analysis of neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 40(8), 2275–2304. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24523 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Walker, G. M., Schwartz, M. F., Kimberg, D. Y., Faseyitan, O., Brecher, A., Dell, G. S., & Coslett, H. B. (2011). Support for anterior temporal involvement in semantic error production in aphasia: New evidence from VLSM. Brain and Language, 117(3), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2010.09.008 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wang, J., Conder, J. A., Blitzer, D. N., & Shinkareva, S. V. (2010). Neural representation of abstract and concrete concepts: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 31(10), 1459–1468. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20950 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Warrington, E. K. (1975). The selective impairment of semantic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27(4), 635–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640747508400525 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Warrington, E. K., & Mccarthy, R. A. (1987). Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain, 110(5), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/110.5.1273 CrossRef Google Scholar

Webster, J., & Whitworth, A. (2012). Treating verbs in aphasia: Exploring the impact of therapy at the single word and sentence levels: Verb therapy in aphasia. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 47(6), 619–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00174.x CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wernicke, C. (1874). Der Aphasische Symptomencomplex: Eine Psychologische Studie auf Anatomischer Basis. Cohn & Weigert.Google Scholar

Willmes, K., & Poeck, K. (1993). To what extent can aphasic syndromes be localized?Brain, 116(6), 1527–1540. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/116.6.1527 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Woollams, A. M., Halai, A., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2018). Mapping the intersection of language and reading: The neural bases of the primary systems hypothesis. Brain Structure and Function, 223(8), 3769–3786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-018-1716-z CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Yarkoni, T., Poldrack, R. A., Nichols, T. E., Van Essen, D. C., & Wagner, T. D. (2011). NeuroSynth: A new platform for large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/conf.fninf.2011.08.00058 Google Scholar

Yourganov, G., Fridriksson, J., Rorden, C., Gleichgerrcht, E., & Bonilha, L. (2016). Multivariate connectome-based symptom mapping in post-stroke patients: Networks supporting language and speech. Journal of Neuroscience, 36(25), 6668–6679. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4396-15.2016 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Yourganov, G., Smith, K. G., Fridriksson, J., & Rorden, C. (2015). Predicting aphasia type from brain damage measured with structural MRI. Cortex, 73, 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.09.005 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Zhao, Y., Halai, A. D., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2020). Evaluating the granularity and statistical structure of lesions and behaviour in post-stroke aphasia. Brain Communications, 2(2), fcaa062. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaa062 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

References

Alves, P., Foulon, C., Karolis, V., Bzdok, D., Margulies, D., Volle, E., & Thiebaut de Schotten, M. (2019). An improved neuroanatomical model of the default-mode network reconciles previous neuroimaging and neuropathological findings. Communications Biology, 2, 370.10.1038/s42003-019-0611-3CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Andrews-Hanna, J. (2012). The brains default network and its adaptive role in internal mentation. The Neuroscientist, 18(3), 251–270.10.1177/1073858411403316CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Andrews-Hanna, J., Reidler, J., Huang, C., & Buckner, R. (2010). Evidence for the default networks role in spontaneous cognition. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 322–335.10.1152/jn.00830.2009CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Balaev, V., Petrushevsky, A., & Martynova, O. (2016). Changes in functional connectivity of default mode network with auditory and right frontoparietal networks in poststroke aphasia. Brain Connectivity, 6(9), 714–723.10.1089/brain.2016.0419CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baliki, M., Babbitt, E., & Cherney, L. (2018). Brain network topology influences response to intensive comprehensive aphasia treatment. NeuroRehabilitation, 43(1), 63–76.10.3233/NRE-182428CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bergeron, D., Beauregard, J., Soucy, J., Verret, L., Poulin, S., Matias-Guiu, J., Cabrera-Martín, M., Bouchard, R., & Laforce, R. (2020). Posterior cingulate cortex hypometabolism in non-amnestic variants of Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 77(4), 1569–1577.10.3233/JAD-200567CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Binder, J., Desai, R., Graves, W., & Conant, L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19(12), 2767–2796.10.1093/cercor/bhp055CrossRef Google Scholar

Biswal, B., Yetkin, F., Haughton, V., & Hyde, J. (1995). Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 34(4).10.1002/mrm.1910340409CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bonakdarpour, B., Rogalski, E., Wang, A., Sridhar, J., Mesulam, M., & Hurley, R. (2017). Functional connectivity is reduced in early-stage primary progressive aphasia when atrophy is not prominent. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 31(2), 101–106.10.1097/WAD.0000000000000193CrossRef Google Scholar

Braga, R., DiNicola, L., Becker, H., & Buckner, R. (2020). Situating the left-lateralized language network in the broader organization of multiple specialized large-scale distributed networks. Journal of Neurophysiology, 124(5), 1415–1448.10.1152/jn.00753.2019CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Buckner, R., Andrews-Hanna, J., & Schacter, D. (2008.) The brain’s default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 1–38.10.1196/annals.1440.011CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Buckner, R., & Krienen, F. (2013). The evolution of distributed association networks in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(12), 648–665.10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.017CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Buckner, R., Sepulcre, J., Talukdar, T., Krienen, F., Liu, H., Hedden, T., Andrews-Hanna, J., Sperling, R., & Johnson, K. (2009). Cortical hubs revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity: Mapping, assessment of stability, and relation to Alzheimer’s disease. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(6), 1860–1873.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5062-08.2009CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Campbell, K., & Tyler, L. (2018). Language-related domain-specific and domain-general systems in the human brain. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 21, 132–137.10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.04.008CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Clemens, B., Jung, S., Mingoia, G., Weyer, D., Domahs, F., & Willmes, K. (2014). Influence of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right angular gyrus on brain activity during rest. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e95984.10.1371/journal.pone.0095984CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Collins, J., Montal, V., Hochberg, D., Quimby, M., Mandelli, M., Makris, N., Seeley, W., Gorno-Tempini, M., & Dickerson, B. (2017). Focal temporal pole atrophy and network degeneration in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia. Brain, 140(2), 457–471.10.1093/brain/aww313CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cordes, D., Haughton, V. M., Arfanakis, K., Wendt, G. J., Turski, P. A., Moritz, C. H., Quigley, M. A., & Meyerand, M. E. (2000). Mapping functionally related regions of brain with functional connectivity MR imaging. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 21(9), 1636–1644.Google Scholar PubMed

Damoiseaux, J., Beckmann, C., Arigita, E., Barkhof, F., Scheltens, P., Stam, C., Smith, S., & Rombouts, S. (2008). Reduced resting-state brain activity in the “default network” in normal aging. Cerebral Cortex, 18(8), 1856–1864.10.1093/cercor/bhm207CrossRef Google Scholar

Davey, C., Pujol, J., & Harrison, B. (2016). Mapping the self in the brain’s default mode network. NeuroImage, 132, 390–397.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.022CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

de Aguiar, V., Zhao, Y., Faria, A., Ficek, B., Webster, K., Wendt, H., Wang, Z., Hillis, A., Onyike, C., Frangakis, C., Caffo, B., & Tsapkini, K. (2020). Brain volumes as predictors of tDCS effects in primary progressive aphasia. Brain and Language, 200, 104707.10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104707CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dixon, M., Andrews-Hanna, J., Spreng, R., Irving, Z., Mills, C., Girn, M., & Christoff, K. (2017). Interactions between the default network and dorsal attention network vary across default subsystems, time, and cognitive states. NeuroImage, 147, 632–649.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.073CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dreyer, F., Doppelbauer, L., Büscher, V., Arndt, V., Stahl, B., Lucchese, G., Hauk, O., Mohr, B., & Pulvermüller, F. (2021). Increased recruitment of domain-general neural networks in language processing following intensive language-action therapy: fMRI evidence from people with chronic aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 30(1S), 455–465.10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00150CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Duncan, E.S., Anakkathil-Pradeep, A., & Small, S. (2020). A review of biological interventions in chronic aphasia. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 23(Suppl 2).10.4103/aian.AIAN_549_20CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Duncan, E. S., & Small, S. L. (2016). Increased modularity of resting state networks supports improved narrative production in aphasia recovery. Brain Connectivity, 6(7), 524–529.10.1089/brain.2016.0437CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Elton, A., & Gao, W. (2015). Task-positive functional connectivity of the default mode network transcends task domain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(12), 2369–2381.10.1162/jocn_a_00859CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Farrás-Permanyer, L., Mancho-Fora, N., Montalà-Flaquer, M., Bartrés-Faz, D., Vaqué-Alcázar, L., Peró-Cebollero, M., & Guàrdia-Olmos, J. (2019). Age-related changes in resting-state functional connectivity in older adults. Neural Regeneration Research, 14(9), 1544–1555.10.4103/1673-5374.255976CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ficek, B., Wang, Z., Zhao, Y., Webster, K., Desmond, J., Hillis, A., Frangakis, C., Faria, A., Caffo, B., & Tsapkini, K. (2019). The effect of tDCS on functional connectivity in primary progressive aphasia. NeuroImage: Clinical, 19, 703–715.10.1016/j.nicl.2018.05.023CrossRef Google Scholar

Flöel, A., Meinzer, M., Kirstein, R., Nijhof, S., Deppe, M., Knecht, S., & Breitenstein, C. (2011). Short-term anomia training and electrical brain stimulation. Stroke, 42(7), 2065–2067.10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.609032CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., Corbetta, M., Van Essen, D. C., & Raichle, M. E. (2005). The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proceeings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(27), 9673–9678.10.1073/pnas.0504136102CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Geng, W., Zhang, J., Shang, S., Chen, H., Shi, M., Jiang, L., Yin, X., & Chen, Y. (2022). Reduced functional network connectivity is associated with upper limb dysfunction in acute ischemic brainstem stroke. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 16(2), 802–810.10.1007/s11682-021-00554-0CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Geranmayeh, F., Leech, R., & Wise, R. (2016). Network dysfunction predicts speech production after left hemisphere stroke. Neurology, 86(14), 1296–1305.10.1212/WNL.0000000000002537CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gola, K., Thorne, A., Veldhuisen, L., Felix, C., Hankinson, S., Pham, J., Shany-Ur, T., Schauer, G., Stanley, C., Glenn, S., Miller, B., & Rankin, K. (2015). Neural substrates of spontaneous narrative production in focal neurodegenerative disease. Neuropsychologia, 79(Pt A), 158–171.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.022CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gordon, E., Laumann, T., Marek, S., Raut, R., Gratton, C., Newbold, D., Greene, D., Coalson, R., Snyder, A., Schlaggar, B., Petersen, S., Dosenbach, N., & Nelson, S. (2020). Default-mode network streams for coupling to language and control systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(29), 17308–17319.10.1073/pnas.2005238117CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Hillis, A. E., Weintraub, S., Kertesz, A., Mendez, M., Cappa, S. F., Ogar, J. M., Rohrer, J. D., Black, S., Boeve, B. F., Manes, F., Dronkers, N. F., Vandenberghe, R., Rascovsky, K., Patterson, K., Miller, B. L., Knopman, D. S., Hodges, J. R., Mesulam, M. M., & Grossman, M. (2011). Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology, 76(11), 1006–1014.10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821103e6CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Griffis, J., Nenert, R., Allendorfer, J., Vannest, J., Holland, S., Dietz, A., & Szaflarski, J. (2017). The canonical semantic network supports residual language function in chronic post-stroke aphasia. Human Brain Mapping, 38(3), 1636–1658.10.1002/hbm.23476CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hampson, M., Peterson, B. S., Skudlarski, P., Gatenby, J. C., & Gore, J. C. (2002). Detection of functional connectivity using temporal correlations in MR images. Human Brain Mapping, 15(4), 247–262.10.1002/hbm.10022CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Huang, Y., Mohan, A., McLeod, S., Luckey, A., Hart, J., & Vanneste, S. (2021). Polarity-specific high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation of the anterior and posterior default mode network improves remote memory retrieval. Brain Stimulation, 14(4), 1005–1014.10.1016/j.brs.2021.06.007CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Huber, W., Weniger, D., Poeck, K., & Willmes, K. (1980.) [The Aachen Aphasia Test rationale and construct validity (author’s translation)]. Der Nervenarzt, 51(8), 475–482.Google Scholar

Johnson, J., Meier, E., Pan, Y., & Kiran, S. (2020). Pre-treatment graph measures of a functional semantic network are associated with naming therapy outcomes in chronic aphasia. Brain and Language, 207, 104809.10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104809CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kertesz, A. (2006). Western Aphasia Battery (Revised), PsychCorp, San Antonio, Tx.10.1037/t15168-000CrossRef Google Scholar

Koch, G., Bonnì, S., Pellicciari, M., Casula, E., Mancini, M., Esposito, R., Ponzo, V., Picazio, S., Di Lorenzo, F., Serra, L., Motta, C., Maiella, M., Marra, C., Cercignani, M., Martorana, A., Caltagirone, C., & Bozzali, M. (2018). Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the precuneus enhances memory and neural activity in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroImage, 169, 302–311.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.048CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Laforce, R., Tosun, D., Ghosh, P., Lehmann, M., Madison, C., Weiner, M., Miller, B., Jagust, W., & Rabinovici, G. (2014). Parallel ICA of FDG-PET and PiB-PET in three conditions with underlying Alzheimer’s pathology. NeuroImage: Clinical, 4, 508–516.10.1016/j.nicl.2014.03.005CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lehmann, M., Ghosh, P., Madison, C., Laforce, R., Corbetta-Rastelli, C., Weiner, M., Greicius, M., Seeley, W., Gorno-Tempini, M., Rosen, H., Miller, B., Jagust, W., & Rabinovici, G. (2013a). Diverging patterns of amyloid deposition and hypometabolism in clinical variants of probable Alzheimer’s disease. Brain, 136(Pt 3), 844–858.10.1093/brain/aws327CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lehmann, M., Madison, C., Ghosh, P., Miller, Z., Greicius, M., Kramer, J., Coppola, G., Miller, B., Jagust, W., Gorno-Tempini, M., Seeley, W., & Rabinovici, G. (2015). Loss of functional connectivity is greater outside the default mode network in nonfamilial early-onset Alzheimer’s disease variants. Neurobiology of Aging, 36(10), 2678–2686.10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.06.029CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lehmann, M., Madison, C., Ghosh, P., Seeley, W., Mormino, E., Greicius, M., Gorno-Tempini, M., Kramer, J., Miller, B., Jagust, W., & Rabinovici, G. (2013b). Intrinsic connectivity networks in healthy subjects explain clinical variability in Alzheimer’s disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(28), 11606–11611.10.1073/pnas.1221536110CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lustig, C., Snyder, A., Bhakta, M., OBrien, K., McAvoy, M., Raichle, M., Morris, J., & Buckner, R. (2003). Functional deactivations: Change with age and dementia of the Alzheimer type. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(24), 14504–14509.10.1073/pnas.2235925100CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Maddy, K., Capilouto, G., & McComas, K. (2014). The effectiveness of semantic feature analysis: An evidence-based systematic review. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 57(4), 254–267.10.1016/j.rehab.2014.03.002CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mak, L., Minuzzi, L., MacQueen, G., Hall, G., Kennedy, S., & Milev, R. (2017). The default mode network in healthy individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Connectivity, 7(1), 25–33.10.1089/brain.2016.0438CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Malagurski, B., Liem, F., Oschwald, J., Mérillat, S., & Jäncke, L. (2020). Longitudinal functional brain network reconfiguration in healthy aging. Human Brain Mapping, 41(17), 4829–4845.10.1002/hbm.25161CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mandelli, M., Vilaplana, E., Brown, J., Hubbard, H., Binney, R., Attygalle, S., Santos-Santos, M., Miller, Z., Pakvasa, M., Henry, M., Rosen, H., Henry, R., Rabinovici, G., Miller, B., Seeley, W., & Gorno-Tempini, M. (2016). Healthy brain connectivity predicts atrophy progression in non-fluent variant of primary progressive aphasia. Brain, 139(Pt 10), 2778–2791.10.1093/brain/aww195CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mandelli, M., Welch, A., Vilaplana, E., Watson, C., Battistella, G., Brown, J., Possin, K., Hubbard, H., Miller, Z., Henry, M., Marx, G., Santos-Santos, M., Bajorek, L., Fortea, J., Boxer, A., Rabinovici, G., Lee, S., Deleon, J., Rosen, H., Miller, B., Seeley, W., & Gorno-Tempini, M. (2018). Altered topology of the functional speech production network in non-fluent/agrammatic variant of PPA. Cortex, 108, 252–264.10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.002CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Marcotte, K., Perlbarg, V., Marrelec, G., Benali, H., & Ansaldo, A. I. (2013) Default-mode network functional connectivity in aphasia: Therapy-induced neuroplasticity. Brain and Language, 124(1), 45–55.10.1016/j.bandl.2012.11.004CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Margulies, D., Ghosh, S., Goulas, A., Falkiewicz, M., Huntenburg, J., Langs, G., Bezgin, G., Eickhoff, S., Castellanos, F., Petrides, M., Jefferies, E., & Smallwood, J. (2016). Situating the default-mode network along a principal gradient of macroscale cortical organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(44), 12574–12579.10.1073/pnas.1608282113CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mars, R., Neubert, F., Noonan, M., Sallet, J., Toni, I., & Rushworth, M. (2012). On the relationship between the “default mode network” and the “social brain.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 189.10.3389/fnhum.2012.00189CrossRef Google Scholar

Martersteck, A., Sridhar, J., Rader, B., Coventry, C., Parrish, T., Mesulam, M., & Rogalski, E. (2020). Differential neurocognitive network perturbation in amnestic and aphasic Alzheimer disease. Neurology, 94(7), e699–e704.10.1212/WNL.0000000000008960CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mason, M., Norton, M., Van Horn, J., Wegner, D., Grafton, S., & Macrae, C. (2007). Wandering minds: The default network and stimulus-independent thought. Science, 315(5810), 393–395.10.1126/science.1131295CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mazoyer, B., Zago, L., Mellet, E., Bricogne, S., Etard, O., Houdé, O., Crivello, F., Joliot, M., Petit, L., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2001). Cortical networks for working memory and executive functions sustain the conscious resting state in man. Brain Research Bulletin, 54(3), 297–298.10.1016/S0361-9230(00)00437-8CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Menke, R., Meinzer, M., Kugel, H., Deppe, M., Baumgärtner, A., Schiffbauer, H., Thomas, M., Kramer, K., Lohmann, H., Flöel, A., Knecht, S., & Breitenstein, C. (2009). Imaging short- and long-term training success in chronic aphasia. BMC Neuroscience, 10, 118.10.1186/1471-2202-10-118CrossRef Google Scholar

Mevel, K., Landeau, B., Fouquet, M., La Joie, R., Villain, N., Mézenge, F., Perrotin, A., Eustache, F., Desgranges, B., & Chételat, G. (2013). Age effect on the default mode network, inner thoughts, and cognitive abilities. Neurobiology of Aging, 34(4), 1292–1301.10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.08.018CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Miao, G., Rao, B., Wang, S., Fang, P., Chen, Z., Chen, L., Zhang, X., Zheng, J., Xu, H., & Liao, W. (2022). Decreased functional connectivities of low-degree level rich club organization and caudate in post-stroke cognitive impairment based on resting-state fMRI and radiomics features. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15, 796530.10.3389/fnins.2021.796530CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mineroff, Z., Blank, I., Mahowald, K., & Fedorenko, E. (2018). A robust dissociation among the language, multiple demand, and default mode networks: Evidence from inter-region correlations in effect size. Neuropsychologia, 119, 501–511.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.09.011CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Muller, A. M., & Meyer, M. (2014). Language in the brain at rest: New insights from resting state data and graph theoretical analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 228.10.3389/fnhum.2014.00228CrossRef Google Scholar

Musso, M., Hübner, D., Schwarzkopf, S., Bernodusson, M., LeVan, P., Weiller, C., & Tangermann, M. (2022). Aphasia recovery by language training using a brain–computer interface: A proof-of-concept study. Brain Communications, 4(1), fcac008.10.1093/braincomms/fcac008CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Naeser, M., Ho, M., Martin, P., Hamblin, M., & Koo, B. (2020). Increased functional connectivity within intrinsic neural networks in chronic stroke following treatment with red/near-infrared transcranial photobiomodulation: Case series with improved naming in aphasia. Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery, 38(2), 115–131.10.1089/photob.2019.4630CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ng, K., Lo, J., Lim, J., Chee, M., & Zhou, J. (2016). Reduced functional segregation between the default mode network and the executive control network in healthy older adults: A longitudinal study. NeuroImage, 133, 312–330.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.029CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nicolas, K., Goodin, P., Visser, M., Michie, P., Bivard, A., Levi, C., Parsons, M., & Karayanidis, F. (2021). Altered functional connectivity and cognition persists 4 years after a transient ischemic attack or minor stroke. Frontiers in Neurology, 12, 612177.10.3389/fneur.2021.612177CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ossenkoppele, R., Cohn-Sheehy, B., La Joie, R., Vogel, J., Möller, C., Lehmann, M., van Berckel, B., Seeley, W., Pijnenburg, Y., Gorno-Tempini, M., Kramer, J., Barkhof, F., Rosen, H., van der Flier, W., Jagust, W., Miller, B., Scheltens, P., & Rabinovici, G. (2015). Atrophy patterns in early clinical stages across distinct phenotypes of Alzheimer’s disease. Human Brain Mapping, 36(11), 4421–4437.10.1002/hbm.22927CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ousdal, O., Kaufmann, T., Kolskår, K., Vik, A., Wehling, E., Lundervold, A., Lundervold, A., & Westlye, L. (2020). Longitudinal stability of the brain functional connectome is associated with episodic memory performance in aging. Human Brain Mapping, 41(3), 697–709.10.1002/hbm.24833CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pearson, J. (2019). The human imagination: The cognitive neuroscience of visual mental imagery. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 20(10), 624–634.10.1038/s41583-019-0202-9CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Persson, J., Pudas, S., Nilsson, L., & Nyberg, L. (2014). Longitudinal assessment of default-mode brain function in aging. Neurobiology of Aging, 35(9), 2107–2117.10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.03.012CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Popal, H., Quimby, M., Hochberg, D., Dickerson, B., & Collins, J. (2020). Altered functional connectivity of cortical networks in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia. NeuroImage: Clinical, 28, 102494.10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102494CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Putcha, D., Eckbo, R., Katsumi, Y., Dickerson, B., Touroutoglou, A., & Collins, J. (2022). Tau and the fractionated default mode network in atypical Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Communications, 4(2), fcac055.10.1093/braincomms/fcac055CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pytel, V., Cabrera-Martín, M., Delgado-Álvarez, A., Ayala, J., Balugo, P., Delgado-Alonso, C., Yus, M., Carreras, M., Carreras, J., Matías-Guiu, J., & Matías-Guiu, J. (2021). Personalized repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for primary progressive aphasia. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 84(1), 151–167.10.3233/JAD-210566CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Raichle, M., MacLeod, A., Snyder, A., Powers, W., Gusnard, D., & Shulman, G. (2001). A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 676–682.10.1073/pnas.98.2.676CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sambataro, F., Murty, V., Callicott, J., Tan, H., Das, S., Weinberger, D., & Mattay, V. (2010). Age-related alterations in default mode network: Impact on working memory performance. Neurobiology of Aging, 31(5), 839–852.10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.05.022CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sandberg, C. W., Bohland, J. W., & Kiran, S. (2015). Changes in functional connectivity related to direct training and generalization effects of a word finding treatment in chronic aphasia. Brain and Language, 150, 103–116.10.1016/j.bandl.2015.09.002CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schafer, R., & Constable, T. (2009). Modulation of functional connectivity with the syntactic and semantic demands of a noun phrase formation task: A possible role for the default network. NeuroImage, 46(3), 882–890.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.017CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Seeley, W., Menon, V., Schatzberg, A., Keller, J., Glover, G., Kenna, H., Reiss, A., & Greicius, M. (2007). Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27(9), 2349–2356.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5587-06.2007CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Seghier, M. L., & Price, C. J. (2012). Functional heterogeneity within the default network during semantic processing and speech production. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 281.10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00281CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Siegel, J., Seitzman, B., Ramsey, L., Ortega, M., Gordon, E., Dosenbach, N., Petersen, S., Shulman, G., & Corbetta, M. (2018). Re-emergence of modular brain networks in stroke recovery. Cortex, 101, 44–59.10.1016/j.cortex.2017.12.019CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sihvonen, A., Leo, V., Ripollés, P., Lehtovaara, T., Ylönen, A., Rajanaro, P., Laitinen, S., Forsblom, A., Saunavaara, J., Autti, T., Laine, M., Rodríguez-Fornells, A., Tervaniemi, M., Soinila, S., & Särkämö, T. (2020). Vocal music enhances memory and language recovery after stroke: Pooled results from two RCTs. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, 7(11), 2272–2287.10.1002/acn3.51217CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Skipper, J. (2022). A voice without a mouth no more: The neurobiology of language and consciousness. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 140, 104772.10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104772CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Smits, M., Jiskoot, L., & Papma, J. (2014). White matter tracts of speech and language. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT, and MR, 35(5), 504–516.10.1053/j.sult.2014.06.008CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Spinelli, E., Mandelli, M., Miller, Z., Santos-Santos, M., Wilson, S., Agosta, F., Grinberg, L., Huang, E., Trojanowski, J., Meyer, M., Henry, M., Comi, G., Rabinovici, G., Rosen, H., Filippi, M., Miller, B., Seeley, W., & Gorno-Tempini, M. (2017). Typical and atypical pathology in primary progressive aphasia variants. Annals of Neurology, 81(3), 430–443.10.1002/ana.24885CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Spreng, R., & Schacter, D. (2012). Default network modulation and large-scale network interactivity in healthy young and old adults. Cerebral Cortex, 22(11), 2610–2621.10.1093/cercor/bhr339CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Staffaroni, A., Brown, J., Casaletto, K., Elahi, F., Deng, J., Neuhaus, J., Cobigo, Y., Mumford, P., Walters, S., Saloner, R., Karydas, A., Coppola, G., Rosen, H., Miller, B., Seeley, W., & Kramer, J. (2018). The longitudinal trajectory of default mode network connectivity in healthy older adults varies as a function of age and is associated with changes in episodic memory and processing speed. The Journal of Neuroscience, 38(11), 2809–2817.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3067-17.2018CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Tomasi, D., & Volkow, N. (2012). Resting functional connectivity of language networks: Characterization and reproducibility. Molecular Psychiatry, 17(8), 841–854.10.1038/mp.2011.177CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Tuladhar, A., Snaphaan, L., Shumskaya, E., Rijpkema, M., Fernandez, G., Norris, D., & de Leeuw, F. (2013). Default mode network connectivity in stroke patients. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e66556.10.1371/journal.pone.0066556CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Uddin, L., Yeo, B., & Spreng, R. (2019). Towards a universal taxonomy of macro-scale functional human brain networks. Brain Topography, 32(6), 926–942.10.1007/s10548-019-00744-6CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Vitali, P., Abutalebi, J., Tettamanti, M., Danna, M., Ansaldo, A., Perani, D., Joanette, Y., & Cappa, S. (2007). Training-induced brain remapping in chronic aphasia: A pilot study. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 21(2), 152–160.10.1177/1545968306294735CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Weiler, M., Fukuda, A., Massabki, L., Lopes, T., Franco, A., Damasceno, B., Cendes, F., & Balthazar, M. (2014). Default mode, executive function, and language functional connectivity networks are compromised in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Current Alzheimer Research, 11(3), 274–282.10.2174/1567205011666140131114716CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Whitwell, J., Jones, D., Duffy, J., Strand, E., Machulda, M., Przybelski, S., Vemuri, P., Gregg, B., Gunter, J., Senjem, M., Petersen, R., Jack, C., & Josephs, K. (2015). Working memory and language network dysfunctions in logopenic aphasia: A task-free fMRI comparison with Alzheimer’s dementia. Neurobiology of Aging, 36(3), 1245–1252.10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.12.013CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Williams, K., Numssen, O., & Hartwigsen, G. (2022). Task-specific network interactions across key cognitive domains. Cerebral Cortex, 32(22), 5050–5071.10.1093/cercor/bhab531CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Xu, K., Niu, N., Li, X., Chen, Y., Wang, D., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., Li, H., Wei, D., Chen, K., Cui, R., Zhang, Z., & Yao, L. (2022). The characteristics of glucose metabolism and functional connectivity in posterior default network during nondemented aging: Relationship with executive function performance. Cerebral Cortex, 33(6), 2901–2911.10.1093/cercor/bhac248CrossRef Google Scholar

Xu, X., Yuan, H., & Lei, X. (2016). Activation and connectivity within the default mode network contribute independently to future-oriented thought. Scientific Reports, 6, 21001.10.1038/srep21001CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Yeshurun, Y., Nguyen, M., & Hasson, U. (2021). The default mode network: Where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 22(3), 181–192.10.1038/s41583-020-00420-wCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Zhang, C., Cahill, N. D., Arbabshirani, M. R., White, T., Baum, S. A., & Michael, A. M. (2016). Sex and age effects of functional connectivity in early adulthood. Brain Connectivity, 6(9), 700–713.10.1089/brain.2016.0429CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Zhang, C., Xia, Y., Feng, T., Yu, K., Zhang, H., Sami, M., Xiang, J., & Xu, K. (2021). Disrupted functional connectivity within and between resting-state networks in the subacute stage of post-stroke aphasia. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15, 746264.10.3389/fnins.2021.746264CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Zhu, D., Chang, J., Freeman, S., Tan, Z., Xiao, J., Gao, Y., & Kong, J. (2014). Changes of functional connectivity in the left frontoparietal network following aphasic stroke. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 167.10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00167CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Zhu, H., Zhou, P., Alcauter, S., Chen, Y., Cao, H., Tian, M., Ming, D., Qi, H., Wang, X., Zhao, X., He, F., Ni, H., & Gao, W. (2016). Changes of intranetwork and internetwork functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Journal of Neural Engineering, 13(4), 046008.10.1088/1741-2560/13/4/046008CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

References

Ackerman, D. J., & Friedman-Krauss, A. H. (2017). Preschoolers’ executive function: Importance, contributors, research needs and assessment options. ETS Research Report Series, 2017(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12148 CrossRef Google Scholar

Alarcón-Rubio, D., Sánchez-Medina, J. A., & Prieto-García, J. R. (2014). Executive function and verbal self-regulation in childhood: Developmental linkages between partially internalized private speech and cognitive flexibility. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.11.002 CrossRef Google Scholar

Alexander, M. P. (2006). Impairments of procedures for implementing complex language are due to disruption of frontal attention processes. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12(2), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617706060309 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Annese, J., Schenker-Ahmed, N. M., Bartsch, H., Maechler, P., Sheh, C., Thomas, N., … & Corkin, S. (2014). Postmortem examination of patient HM’s brain based on histological sectioning and digital 3D reconstruction. Nature Communications, 5(1), 3122. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4122 CrossRef Google Scholar

Archibald, L. M., & Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Short‐term and working memory in specific language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 41(6), 675–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820500442602 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Atilgan, H., Town, S. M., Wood, K. C., Jones, G. P., Maddox, R. K., Lee, A. K., & Bizley, J. K. (2018). Integration of visual information in auditory cortex promotes auditory scene analysis through multisensory binding. Neuron, 97(3), 640–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.12.034 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 89 –195. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60422-3 CrossRef Google Scholar

Avons, S. E., Wragg, C. A., Cupples, W. L., & Lovegrove, W. J. (1998). Measures of phonological short-term memory and their relationship to vocabulary development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(4), 583–601. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716400010377 CrossRef Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736359 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4 (11), 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01538-2 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(3), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9924(03)00019-4 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baddeley, A. D. (1966). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic and formal similarity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(4), 362–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640746608400055 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. A. (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). Academic Press. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(6), 575–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(75)80045-4 CrossRef Google Scholar

Baddeley, A., & Wilson, B. (1985). Phonological coding and short-term memory in patients without speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(4), 490–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596x(85)90041-5 CrossRef Google Scholar

Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105(1), 158–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.105.1.158 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Banerjee, S., Snyder, A. C., Molholm, S., & Foxe, J. J. (2011). Oscillatory alpha-band mechanisms and the deployment of spatial attention to anticipated auditory and visual target locations: Supramodal or sensory-specific control mechanisms? Journal of Neuroscience, 31(27), 9923–9932. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4660-10.2011 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Barry, D. N., & Maguire, E. A. (2019). Remote memory and the hippocampus: A constructive critique. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.11.005 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Best, V., Ozmeral, E. J., & Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2007). Visually-guided attention enhances target identification in a complex auditory scene. Journal for the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 8 (2), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-007-0073-z CrossRef Google Scholar

Bisaz, R., Travaglia, A., & Alberini, C. M. (2014). The neurobiological bases of memory formation: From physiological conditions to psychopathology. Psychopathology, 47(6), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1159/000363702 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Blumenfeld, R. S., & Ranganath, C. (2007). Prefrontal cortex and long-term memory encoding: An integrative review of findings from neuropsychology and neuroimaging. The Neuroscientist, 13(3), 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858407299290 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bosse, M.-L., Tainturier, M. J., & Valdois, S. (2007). Developmental dyslexia: The visual attention span deficit hypothesis. Cognition, 104(2), 198–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.009 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Botvinick, M., & Braver, T. (2015). Motivation and cognitive control: From behavior to neural mechanism. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 83–113. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015044 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bozeat, S., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Graham, K. S., Patterson, K., Wilkin, H., Rowland, J., Rogers, T. T., & Hodges, J. R. (2003). A duck with four legs: Investigating the structure of conceptual knowledge using picture drawing in semantic dementia. Cognitive neuropsychology, 20(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290244000176 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1486.001.0001 CrossRef Google Scholar

Brill-Schuetz, K., & Morgan-Short, K. (2014). The role of procedural memory in adult second langauge acquisition. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 36(36). https://doi.org/10.1037/e502412013–500 Google Scholar

Broadbent, D. E. (1952). Failures of attention in selective listening. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44(6), 428–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057163 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Brod, G., Werkle-Bergner, M., & Shing, Y. L. (2013). The influence of prior knowledge on memory: A developmental cognitive neuroscience perspective. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 139. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00139 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Brown, G. J., Ferry, R. T., & Meddis, R. (2010). A computer model of auditory efferent suppression: Implications for the recognition of speech in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(2), 943–954. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3273893 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Buckner, R. L. (2002). Frontally mediated control processes contribute to source memory retrieval. Neuron, 35(5), 817–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00866-8 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cabeza, R., & Moscovitch, M. (2013). Memory systems, processing modes, and components: Functional neuroimaging evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612469033 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31 CrossRef Google Scholar

Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 77–126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001788 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Chavez-Arana, C., Catroppa, C., Carranza-Escarcega, E., Godfrey, C., Yanez-Tellez, G., Prieto-Corona, B., … Anderson, V. (2018). A systematic review of interventions for hot and cold executive functions in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 43(8), 928–942. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsy013 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cherry, E.C. (1953) Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 974–979. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1907229 CrossRef Google Scholar

Cheung, H. (1996). Nonword span as a unique predictor or second-language vocabulary language. Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 867. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.5.867 CrossRef Google Scholar

Chiou, H. S., & Kennedy, M. R. T. (2009). Switching in adults with aphasia. Aphasiology, 23(7–8), 1065–1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030802642028 CrossRef Google Scholar

Choinski, M., Szelag, E., Wolak, T., & Szymaszek, A. (2020). Working memory in aphasia: The role of temporal information processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.589802 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ciaramelli, E., Burioanová, H., Vallesi, A., Cabeza, R., & Moscovitch, M. (2020). Funcitonal interplay between posterior parietal cortex and hippocampus durign detection of memory targets and non-targets. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.563768 CrossRef Google Scholar

Coelho, C. A. (2007). Management of discourse deficits following traumatic brain injury: Progress, caveats, and needs. Seminars in Speech and Language, 28(2), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-970570 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Conrad, R., & Hull, A. J. (1964). Information, acoustic confusion and memory span. British Journal of Psychology, 55(4), 429–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1964.tb00928.x CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Conti-Ramsden, G., Ullman, M. T., & Lum, J. A. (2015). The relation between receptive grammar and procedural, declarative, and working memory in specific language impairment. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1090. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01090 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 769–786. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196772 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn755 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Corkin, S. (1968). Acquisition of motor skill after bilateral medial temporal-lobe excision. Neuropsychologia. 6(3), 255–265.10.1016/0028-3932(68)90024-9CrossRef Google Scholar

Covington, M. A., He, C., Brown, C., Naçi, L., McClain, J. T., Fjordbak, B. S., Semple, J., & Brown, J. (2005). Schizophrenia and the structure of language: The linguist’s view. Schizophrenia Research, 77(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2005.01.016 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cowan, N. (2008). What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory?. In Sossin, W. S., Lacaille, J.-C., Castellucci, V. F., & Belleville, S. (Eds.), Progress in Brain Research (Vol. 169, pp. 323–338). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(07)00020-9 Google Scholar

Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6 CrossRef Google Scholar

Datta, R., & DeYoe, E. A. (2009). I know where you are secretly attending! The topography of human visual attention revealed with fMRI. Vision Research, 49(10), 1037–1044. https://10.1016/j.visres.2009.01.01410.1016/j.visres.2009.01.014CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Davachi, L., & Dobbins, I. G. (2008). Declarative memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(2), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00559.x CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

de Abreu, P. M. J. E., Gathercole, S. E., & Martin, R. (2011). Disentangling the relationship between working memory and language: The roles of short-term storage and cognitive control. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.06.002 CrossRef Google Scholar

DeDe, G., Ricca, M., Knilans, J., & Trubl, B. (2014). Construct validity and reliability of working memory tasks for people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 28(6), 692–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2014.895973 CrossRef Google Scholar

Dew, I. T. Z., & Cabeza, R. (2011). The porous boundaries between explicit and implicit memory: Behavioral and neural evidence. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1224(1), 174–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05946.x CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dickerson, B. C., & Eichenbaum, H. (2010). The episodic memory system: Neurocircuitry and disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology, 35(1), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2009.126 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dudai, Y., & Morris, R. G. (2013). Memorable trends. Neuron, 80(3), 742–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.039 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Durlach, N. I., Mason, C. R., Kidd, G. Jr., Arbogast, T. L., Colburn, H. S., & Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2003). Note on informational masking (L). The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(6), 2984–2987. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1570435 CrossRef Google Scholar

Ebert, K. D., & Kohnert, K. (2011). Sustained attention in children with primary language impairment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(5), 1372–1384. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0231)CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Eichenbaum, H. (2001). The hippocampus and declarative memory: Cognitive mechanisms and neural codes. Behavioral Brain Research, 127(1–2), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00365-5 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

El Hachioui, H., Visch-Brink, E. G., Lingsma, H. F., van de Sandt-Koenderman, M. W., Dippel, D. W., Koudstaal, P. J., & Middelkoop, H. A. (2014). Nonlinguistic cognitive impairment in poststroke aphasia. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 28(3), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968313508467 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00160 CrossRef Google Scholar

Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(3), 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.309 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Estes, K. G., Evans, J. L., & Else-Quest, N. M. (2007). Differences in the nonword repetition performance of children with and without specific language impairment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/015)CrossRef Google Scholar

Ettlinger, M., Bradlow, A. R., & Wong, P. C. (2014). Variability in the learning of complex morphophonology. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(4), 807–831. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000586 CrossRef Google Scholar

Fahy, J. K. (2014). Language and executive functions: Self-talk for self-regulation. Perspectives on Language Learning and Education, 21(2), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1044/lle21.2.61 CrossRef Google Scholar

Failing, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2018). Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(2), 514–538. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1380-y CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fallon, M., Peelle, J. E., & Wingfield, A. (2006). Spoken sentence processing in young and older adults modulated by task demands: Evidence from self-paced listening. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61, P10–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/Geronb/61.1.P10 Google Scholar

Fatzer, S. T., & Roebers, C. M. (2012). Language and executive functions: The effect of articulatory suppression on executive functioning in children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 13(4), 454–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2011.608322 CrossRef Google Scholar

Fernández, G. (2017). The medial prefrontal cortex is a critical hub in the declarative memory system. In Axmacher, N. & Rasch, B. (Eds.), Cognitive Neuroscience of Memory Consolidation (pp. 45–56). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45066-7_3 CrossRef Google Scholar

Foster, J. J., & Awh, E. (2019). The role of alpha oscillations in spatial attention: Limited evidence for a suppression account. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.11.001 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Foster, J. L., Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., Hicks, K. L., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2014). Shortened complex span tasks can reliably measure working memory capacity. Memory & Cognition, 43(2), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0461-7 CrossRef Google Scholar

Frankland, P. W., Josselyn, S. A., & Köhler, S. (2019). The neurobiological foundation of memory retrieval. Nature neuroscience, 22(10), 1576–1585. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-019-0493-1 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fridriksson, J., Nettles, C., Davis, M., Morrow, L., & Montgomery, A. (2006). Functional communication and executive function in aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 20(6), 401–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200500075781 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Friedman, N. P., & Robbins, T. W. (2021). The role of the prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function. Neuropsychopharmacology, 47(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01132-0 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Altamirano, L. J., Corley, R. P., Young, S. E., Rhea, S. A., & Hewitt, J. K. (2016). Stability and change in executive function abilities from late adolescence to early adulthood: A longitudinal twin study. Developmental Psychology, 52(2), 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000075 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Robinson, J. L., & Hewitt, J. K. (2011). Developmental trajectories in toddlers’ self-restraint predict individual differences in executive functions 14 years later: A behavioral genetic analysis. Developmental Psychology, 47(5), 1410–1430. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023750 CrossRef Google Scholar

Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., Corley, R. P., & Hewitt, J. K. (2008). Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(2), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.201 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fritz, J. B., Elhilali, M., David, S. V., & Shamma, S. A. (2007). Auditory attention: Focusing the searchlight on sound. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17(4), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2007.07.011 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fuhs, M. W., & Day, J. D. (2011). Verbal ability and executive functioning development in preschoolers at head start. Developmental Psychology, 47(2), 404–416. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021065 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Garon, N., Bryson, S. E., & Smith, I. M. (2008). Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 31–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.31 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Complexities and constraints in nonword repetition and word learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(4), 599–613. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640606053X CrossRef Google Scholar

Gathercole, S. E., Alloway, T. P., Willis, C., & Adams, A.-M. (2006). Working memory in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93(3), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.08.003 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gathercole, S. E., Hitch, G. J., Service, E., & Martin, A. J. (1997). Phonological short-term memory and new word learning in children. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 966–979. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.966 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gathercole, S. E., & Masoura, E. V. (2005). Contrasting contributions of phonological short‐term memory and long‐term knowledge to vocabulary learning in a foreign language. Memory, 13(3–4), 422–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210344000323 CrossRef Google Scholar

Gherri, E., & Eimer, M. (2011). Active listening impairs visual perception and selectivity: An ERP study of auditory dual-task costs on visual attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(4), 832–844. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21468 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gordon, J. K., & Dell, G. S. (2003). Learning to divide the labor: An account of deficits in light and heavy verb production. Cognitive Science, 27(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2701_1 CrossRef Google Scholar

Graf Estes, K., Evans, J. L., & Else-Quest, N. M. (2007). Differences in the nonword repetition performance of children with and without specific language impairment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(1), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/015)CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(3), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.11.3.501 Google Scholar PubMed

Gray, S. I., Levy, R., Alt, M., Hogan, T. P., & Cowan, N. (2022). Working memory predicts new word learning over and above existing vocabulary and nonverbal IQ. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 65(3), 1044–1069. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_jslhr-21-00397 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Green, J. J., Doesburg, S. M., Ward, L. M., & McDonald, J. J. (2011). Electrical neuroimaging of voluntary audio spatial attention: Evidence for a supramodal attention control network. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(10), 3560–3564. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.5758-10.2011 CrossRef Google Scholar

Green, J. J., Teder-Sälejärvi, W. A., & McDonald, J. J. (2005). Control mechanisms mediating shifts of attention in auditory and visual space: A spatio-temporal ERP analysis. Experimental Brain Research, 166(3), 358–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2377-8 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Händel, B. F., Haarmeier, T., & Jensen, O. (2011). Alpha oscillations correlate with the successful inhibition of unattended stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(9), 2494-2502. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21557 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Helm-Estabrooks, N. (2002). Cognition and aphasia: A discussion and a study. Journal of Communication Disorders, 35(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9924(02)00063-1 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Henson, R. N. A., Burgess, N., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Recoding, storage, rehearsal and grouping in verbal short-term memory: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 38(4), 426–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00098-6 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hodges, J. R., & Graham, K. S. (2001). Episodic memory: Insights from semantic dementia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 356(1413), 1423–1434. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2001.0943 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2007). The neuropsychology of frontotemporal dementia. Frontotemporal Dementia Syndromes, 35(102–133), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316135457.006 Google Scholar

Howland, K. (2014). Developing executive control skills in preschool children with language impairment. Perspectives on Language Learning and Education, 21(2), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1044/lle21.2.51 CrossRef Google Scholar

Hughes, C., Ensor, R., Wilson, A., & Graham, A. (2010). Tracking executive function across the transition to school: A latent variable approach. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565640903325691 CrossRef Google Scholar

Hughes, R. W., & Marsh, J. E. (2017). The functional determinants of short-term memory: Evidence from perceptual-motor interference in verbal serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(4), 537–551. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000325 Google Scholar PubMed

Hula, W. D., & McNeil, M. R. (2008). Models of attention and dual-task performance as explanatory constructs in aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29(3), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1082882 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Humphreys, G. W., & Forde, E. M. (2001). Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: “Category-specific” neuropsychological deficits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3), 453–509. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x01004150 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Humphreys, G. W., Price, C. J., & Riddoch, M. J. (1999). From objects to names: A cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychological Research, 62(2–3), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004260050046 CrossRef Google Scholar

Hunt, R. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(4), 421–445. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1023 CrossRef Google Scholar

Hurlstone, M. J., & Hitch, G. J. (2018). How is the serial order of a visual sequence represented? Insights from transposition latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(2), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000440 Google Scholar

Hurlstone, M. J., Hitch, G. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2014). Memory for serial order across domains: An overview of the literature and directions for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 140(2), 339–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034221 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modeling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(3), 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1038/35058500 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Jarrold, C., Thorn, A. S. C., & Stephens, E. (2009). The relationships among verbal short-term memory, phonological awareness, and new word learning: Evidence from typical development and Down syndrome. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(2), 196–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.07.001 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Javadi, A. H., & Walsh, V. (2012). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the left dorsolateral the prefrontal cortex modulates declarative memory. Brain Stimulation, 5(3), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2011.06.007 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Jensen, O., Bonnefond, M., & VanRullen, R. (2012). An oscillatory mechanism for prioritizing salient unattended stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(4), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.002 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Joanisse, M. F., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: A connectionist model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(13), 7592–7597. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.13.7592 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Jones, S. M., Bailey, R., Barnes, S. P., & Partee, A. (2016). Executive function mapping project: Untangling the terms and skills related to executive function and self-regulation in early childhood. OPRE Report # 2016-88, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/opre/efmapping_report_101416_final_508.pdf Google Scholar

Jonker, T. R., Seli, P., & MacLeod, C. M. (2015). Retrieval-induced forgetting and context. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(4), 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415573203 CrossRef Google Scholar

Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.122 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and Effort (Vol. 1063). Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kapa, L. L., & Erikson, J. A. (2020). The relationship between word learning and executive function in preschoolers with and without developmental language disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(7), 2293–2307. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_jslhr-19-00342 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kapa, L. L., & Plante, E. (2015). Executive function in SLI: Recent advances and future directions. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 2(3), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474–015-0050-x CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Karr, J. E., Areshenkoff, C. N., Rast, P., Hofer, S. M., Iverson, G. L., & Garcia-Barrera, M. A. (2018). The unity and diversity of executive functions: A systematic review and re-analysis of latent variable studies. Psychological Bulletin, 144(11), 1147–1185. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000160 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kaushanskaya, M., Park, J. S., Gangopadhyay, I., Davidson, M. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2017). The relationship between executive functions and language abilities in children: A latent variable approach. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(4), 912–923. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_jslhr-l-15-0310 CrossRef Google Scholar

Kelly, S. P., Lalor, E. C., Reilly, R. B., & Foxe, J. J. (2006). Increases in alpha oscillatory power reflect an active retinotopic mechanism for distracter suppression during sustained visuospatial attention. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95(6), 3844–3851. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01234.2005 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kempe, V., Brooks, P. J., & Kharkhurin, A. (2010). Cognitive predictors of generalization of Russian grammatical gender categories. Language Learning, 60(1), 127–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00553.x CrossRef Google Scholar

Kennedy, M. R. T., & Coelho, C. (2005). Self-regulation after traumatic brain injury: A framework for intervention of memory and problem solving. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26(04), 242–255. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-922103 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kidd, G. Jr., (2017). Enhancing auditory selective attention using a visually guided hearing aid. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(10), 3027–3038. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_jslhr-h-17-0071 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kidd, G. Jr., & Colburn, H. S. (2017). Informational masking in speech recognition. In Middlebrooks, J. C., Simon, J. Z., Popper, A. N., & Fay, R. R. (Eds.), The Auditory System at the Cocktail Party (pp. 75–109). Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-51662-2_4CrossRef Google Scholar

Kidd, G. Jr., Favrot, S., Desloge, J. G., Streeter, T. M., & Mason, C. R. (2013). Design and preliminary testing of a visually guided hearing aid. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(3), EL202–EL207. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4791710 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kidd, G. Jr., Jennings, T. R., & Byrne, A. J. (2020). Enhancing the perceptual segregation and localization of sound sources with a triple beamformer. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 148(6), 3598–3611. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0002779 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kidd, G. Jr., Mason, C. R., Swaminathan, J., Roverud, E., Clayton, K. K., & Best, V. (2016). Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(1), 132-144. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4954748 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kim, W. B., & Cho, J.-H. (2020). Encoding of contextual fear memory in hippocampal–amygdala circuit. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15121-2 Google Scholar PubMed

Kintsch, W., Patel, V. L., & Ericsson, K. A. (1999). The role of long-term working memory in text comprehension. Psychologia, 42(4), 186–198.Google Scholar

Kirchner, W. K. (1958). Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(4), 352–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043688 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kirkham, N. Z., Cruess, L., & Diamond, A. (2003). Helping children apply their knowledge to their behavior on a dimension-switching task. Developmental Science, 6(5), 449–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00300 CrossRef Google Scholar

Klatte, M., Lee, N., & Hellbruck, J. (2002). Effects of irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression on serial recall of heard and read materials. Psychologische Beiträge, 44(2), 166–186.Google Scholar

Klauer, K. C., & Zhao, Z. (2004). Double dissociations in visual and spatial short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(3), 355–381. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.355 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Klimesch, W. (2012). Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(12), 606–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.007 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kuhn, L. J., Willoughby, M. T., Vernon-Feagans, L., Blair, C. B., & The Family Life Project Key Investigators. (2016). The contribution of children’s time-specific and longitudinal expressive language skills on developmental trajectories of executive function. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 148, 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.03.008 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kuperberg, G. R., Kreher, D. A., & Ditman, T. (2010). What can event-related potentials tell us about language, and perhaps even thought, in schizophrenia? International Journal of Psychophysiology, 75(2), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.09.005 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lang, C. J., & Quitz, A. (2012). Verbal and nonverbal memory impairment in aphasia. Journal of Neurology, 259(8), 1655–1661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-6394-1 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

LeDoux, J. E. (2014). Coming to terms with fear. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(8), 2871–2878. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1400335111 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Levine, B., Dawson, D., Boutet, I., Schwartz, M. L., & Stuss, D. T. (2000). Assessment of strategic self-regulation in traumatic brain injury: Its relationship to injury severity and psychosocial outcome. Neuropsychology, 14(4), 491–500. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.14.4.491 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lidstone, J. S. M., Meins, E., & Fernyhough, C. (2010). The roles of private speech and inner speech in planning during middle childhood: Evidence from a dual task paradigm. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107(4), 438–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.06.002 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Liew, J. (2011). Effortful control, executive functions, and education: Bringing self-regulatory and social-emotional competencies to the table. Child Development Perspectives, 6(2), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00196.x CrossRef Google Scholar

Logue, S. F., & Gould, T. J. (2014). The neural and genetic basis of executive function: Attention, cognitive flexibility, and response inhibition. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 123, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2013.08.007 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lu, K., Xu, Y., Yin, P., Oxenham, A. J., Fritz, J. B., & Shamma, S. A. (2017). Temporal coherence structure rapidly shapes neuronal interactions. Nature Communications, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13900 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Maddox, R. K., Atilgan, H., Bizley, J. K., & Lee, A. K. (2015). Auditory selective attention is enhanced by a task-irrelevant temporally coherent visual stimulus in human listeners. eLife, 4. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.04995 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mädebach, A., Jescheniak, J. D., Oppermann, F., & Schriefers, H. (2011). Ease of processing constrains the activation flow in the conceptual-lexical system during speech planning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(3), 649–660. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022330 Google Scholar PubMed

Majerus, S. (2019). Verbal working memory and the phonological buffer: The question of serial order. Cortex, 112, 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.04.016 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Majerus, S., Poncelet, M., Grefee, C., & Van der Linden, M. (2006). Relations between vocabulary development and verbal short-term memory for serial order and item information. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93(2), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.07.005 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Martella, D., Casagrande, M., & Lupiáñez, J. (2011). Alerting, orienting and executive control: The effects of sleep deprivation on attentional networks. Experimental Brain Research, 210(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2605-3 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Martin, K. I., & Ellis, N. C. (2012). The roles of phonological short-term memory and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 379–413. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000125 CrossRef Google Scholar

Martin, N., Kohen, F., Kalinyak-Fliszar, M., Soveri, A., & Laine, M. (2012). Effects of working memory load on processing of sounds and meanings of words in aphasia. Aphasiology, 26(3–4), 462–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.619516 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Martin, R. C. (2021). The critical role of semantic working memory in language comprehension and production. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(4), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721421995178 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2018). Memory (encoding, storage, retrieval). In Biswas-Diener, R. & Diener, E. (Eds.), General Psychology FA18 (pp. 117–140). Noba Project.Google Scholar

McGaugh, J. L., Cahill, L., & Roozendaal, B. (1996). Involvement of the amygdala in memory storage: Interaction with other brain systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93(24), 13508–13514. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.24.13508 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Melton, A. W. (1963). Implications of short-term memory for a general theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(63)80063-8 CrossRef Google Scholar

Meneghetti, C., De Beni, R., Pazzaglia, F., & Gyselinck, V. (2011). The role of visuo-spatial abilities in recall of spatial descriptions: A mediation model. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(6), 719–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.015 CrossRef Google Scholar

Menon, V., & D’Esposito, M. (2022). The role of PFC networks in cognitive control and executive function. Neuropsychopharmacology, 47(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01152-w CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mesgarani, N., Fritz, J., & Shamma, S. (2010). A computational model of rapid task-related plasticity of auditory cortical receptive fields. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 28(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-009-0181-3 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.3 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Miller, E. K. (2013). The “working” of working memory. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 15(4), 411–418. https://doi.org/10.31887/dcns.2013.15.4/emiller CrossRef Google Scholar

Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24(1), 167–202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Miller, E. K., Lundqvist, M., & Bastos, A. M. (2018). Working memory 2.0. Neuron, 100(2), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.023 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Miller, S., McCulloch, S., & Jarrold, C. (2015). The development of memory maintenance strategies: Training cumulative rehearsal and interactive imagery in children aged between 5 and 9. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00524 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Milner, B., Corkin, S., & Teuber, H. L. (1968). Further analysis of the hippocampal amnesic syndrome: A 14-year follow-up study of H.M. Neuropsychologia, 6(3), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(68)90021-3 CrossRef Google Scholar

Milner, B., Squire, L. R., & Kandel, E. R. (1998). Cognitive neuroscience and the study of memory. Neuron, 20(3), 445–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896–6273(00)80987-3 CrossRef Google Scholar

Mirsky, A. F., Anthony, B. J., Duncan, C. C., Ahearn, M. B., & Kellam, S. G. (1991). Analysis of the elements of attention: A neuropsychological approach. Neuropsychology Review, 2(2), 109–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01109051 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429458 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Miyake, A., Emerson, M. J., Padilla, F., & Ahn, J. (2004). Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: The effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cueing paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 115, 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.12.004 CrossRef Google Scholar

Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mohapatra, B., & Marshall, R. S. (2019). Performance differences between aphasia and healthy aging on an executive function test battery. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22(4), 487–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2019.1691262 CrossRef Google Scholar

Morey, C. C., Cowan, N., Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2011). Flexible attention allocation to visual and auditory working memory tasks: Manipulating reward induces a trade-off. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(2), 458–472. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-010-0031-4 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Morgan-Short, K., Faretta-Stutenberg, M., Brill-Schuetz, K. A., Carpenter, H., & Wong, P. C. (2014). Declarative and procedural memory as individual differences in second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000715 CrossRef Google Scholar

Morgan-Short, K., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M. T. (2012). Explicit and implicit langauge training differentially affect the achievement of native-like brain activation patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(4), 933–947. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00119 CrossRef Google Scholar

Morris, N., & Jones, D. M. (1990). Memory updating in working memory: The role of the central executive. British Journal of Psychology, 81(2), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02349.x CrossRef Google Scholar

Mosse, E. K., & Jarrold, C. (2008). Short article: Hebb learning, verbal short-term memory, and the acquisition of phonological forms in children. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(4), 505–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701680779 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Müller, U., Kerns, K. A., & Konkin, K. (2012). Test-retest reliability and practice effects of executive function tasks in preschool children. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26(2), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2011.645558 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Munson, B., Kurtz, B. A., & Windsor, J. (2005). The influence of vocabulary size, phonotactic probability, and word likeness on nonword repetitions of children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(5), 1033–1047. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/072)CrossRef Google Scholar

Murayama, K., Miyatsu, T., Buchli, D., & Storm, B. C. (2014). Forgetting as a consequence of retrieval: A meta-analytic review of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1383–1409. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037505 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Murray, L. L. (1999). Review attention and aphasia: Theory, research and clinical implications. Aphasiology, 13(2), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870399402226 CrossRef Google Scholar

Murray, L. L. (2012). Attention and other cognitive deficits in aphasia: Presence and relation to language and communication measures. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(2), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0067)CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Murray, L., Salis, C., Martin, N., & Dralle, J. (2018). The use of standardized short-term and working memory tests in aphasia research: A systematic review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 28(3), 309–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2016.1174718 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nadel, L., & Moscovitch, M. (1997). Memory consolidation, retrograde amnesia and the hippocampal complex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7(2), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4388(97)80010-4 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nadel, L., Samsonovich, A., Ryan, L., & Moscovitch, M. (2000). Multiple trace theory of human memory: Computational, neuroimaging, and neuropsychological results. Hippocampus, 10(4), 352–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-1063(2000)10:4<352::aid-hipo2>3.0.co;2-d 3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nasar, J., Hecht, P., & Wener, R. (2008). Mobile telephones, distracted attention, and pedestrian safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(1), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.04.005 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nicholas, M., & Connor, L. T. (2017) People with aphasia using AAC: Are executive functions important? Aphasiology, 31(7), 819–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2016.1258539 CrossRef Google Scholar

Nicholas, M., Sinotte, M. P., & Helm-Estabrooks, N. (2011). C-speak aphasia alternative communication program for people with severe aphasia: Importance of executive functioning and semantic knowledge. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 21(3), 322–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2011.559051 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Norris, D., & Kalm, K. (2021). Chunking and data compression in verbal short-term memory. Cognition, 208, 104534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104534 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136 CrossRef Google Scholar

Obermeyer, J., Schlesinger, J., & Martin, N. (2020). Evaluating the contribution of executive functions to language tasks in cognitively demanding contexts. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 29(1S), 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_ajslp-cac48-18-0216 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ojemann, G. A., Schoenfield-McNeill, J., & Corina, D. (2009). The roles of human lateral temporal cortical neuronal activity in recent verbal memory encoding. Cerebral Cortex, 19(1), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn071 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Olsson, C., Arvidsson, P., & Blom Johansson, M. (2019). Relations between executive function, language, and functional communication in severe aphasia. Aphasiology, 33(7), 821–845. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2019.1602813 CrossRef Google Scholar

Olsson, C., Arvidsson, P., & Blom Johansson, M. (2020). Measuring executive function in people with severe aphasia: Comparing neuropsychological tests and informant ratings. NeuroRehabilitation, 46(3), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.3233/nre-192998 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Oppermann, F., Jescheniak, J. D., & Görges, F. (2014). Resolving competition when naming an object in a multiple-object display. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(1), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0465-5 CrossRef Google Scholar

Oswald, F. L., McAbee, S. T., Redick, T. S., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2015). The development of a short domain-general measure of working memory capacity. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1343–1355. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0543-2 CrossRef Google Scholar

Packard, M. G., and McGaugh, J. L. (1996). Inactivation of hippocampus or caudate nucleus with lidocaine differentially affects expression of place and response learning. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 65(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1006/nlme.1996.0007 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Papagno, C., & Vallar, G. (1992). Phonological short-term memory and learning of novel words: The effect of phonological similarity and item length. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 44 (1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749208401283 CrossRef Google Scholar

Papagno, C., Valentine, T., & Baddeley, A. (1991). Phonological short-term memory and foreign-language vocabulary learning. Journal of Memory & Language, 30(3), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596x(91)90040-q CrossRef Google Scholar

Park, J., Miller, C. A., Sanjeevan, T., van Hell, J. G., Weiss, D. J., & Mainela-Arnold, E. (2019). Bilingualism and attention in typically developing children and children with developmental language disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(11), 4105–4118. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_jslhr-l-18-0341 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pauls, L. J., & Archibald, L. M. (2016). Executive functions in children with specific language impairment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(5), 1074–1086. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_jslhr-l-15-0174 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Peng, P., Barnes, M., Wang, C., Wang, W., Li, S., Swanson, H. L., Dardick, W., & Tao, S. (2018). A meta-analysis on the relation between reading and working memory. Psychological Bulletin, 144(1), 48–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000124 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Peristeri, E., Tsimpli, I. M., Dardiotis, E., & Tsapkini, K. (2020). Effects of executive attention on sentence processing in aphasia. Aphasiology, 34(8), 943–969. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2019.1622647 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Peteranderl, S., & Oberauer, K. (2018). Serial recall of colors: Two models of memory for serial order applied to continuous visual stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 46(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0741-0 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Poldrack, R. A., & Gabrieli, J. D. (1997). Functional anatomy of long-term memory. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 14(4), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004691-199707000-00003 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109(2), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Potagas, C., Kasselimis, D., & Evdokimidis, I. (2011). Short-term and working memory impairments in aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 49(10), 2874–2878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.06.013 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Purdy, M. (2002). Executive function ability in persons with aphasia. Aphasiology, 16(4–6), 549–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030244000176 CrossRef Google Scholar

Rankin, E., Newton, C., Parker, A., & Bruce, C. (2014). Hearing loss and auditory processing ability in people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 28(5), 576–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2013.878452 CrossRef Google Scholar

Reber, P. J. (2008). Cognitive neuroscience of declarative and nondeclarative memory. In Guadagnoli, M., Benjamin, A. S., de Belle, J. S., Etnyre, B., & Polk, T. A. (Eds.), Human Learning: Biology, Brain and Neuroscience (Vol. 139, pp. 113–123). Elsevier.10.1016/S0166-4115(08)10010-3CrossRef Google Scholar

Reber, P. J. (2013). The neural basis of implicit learning and memory: A review of neuropsychological and neuroimaging research. Neuropsychologia, 51(10), 2026–2042. https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.06.019 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Richmond, J., & Nelson, C. A. (2007). Accounting for change in declarative memory: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Developmental Review, 27(3), 349–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.04.002 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Roelofs, A., & Piai, V. (2011). Attention demands of spoken word planning: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00307 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rogalsky, C., Matchin, W., & Hickok, G. (2008). Broca’s area, sentence comprehension, and working memory: An fMRI study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.014.2008 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rogers, T., Hodges, J., Patterson, K., & Lambon Ralph, M. (2003). Object recognition under semantic impairment: The effects of conceptual regularities on perceptual decisions. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(5–6), 625–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000053 CrossRef Google Scholar

Rogers, T. T., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Garrard, P., Bozeat, S., McClelland, J. L., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2004). Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: A neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychological Review, 111(1), 205–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.111.1.205 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Romberg, A. R., & Saffran, J. R. (2010). Statistical learning and language acquisition. WIREs Cognitive Science, 1(6), 906–914. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.78 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Romero Lauro, L. J., Reis, J., Cohen, L. G., Cecchetto, C., & Papagno, C. (2010). A case for the involvement of phonological loop in sentence comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 48(14), 4003–4011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.10.019 CrossRef Google Scholar

Rudner, M., & Rönnberg, J. (2008). The role of the episodic buffer in working memory for language processing. Cognitive Processing, 9(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-007-0183-x CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Saffran, J. R. (2020). Statistical language learning in infancy. Child Development Perspectives, 14(1), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12355 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Saffran, J. R., & Kirkham, N. Z. (2018). Infant statistical learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011805 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schacter, D. L., & Dodson, C. S. (2001). Misattribution, false recognition and the sins of memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 356(1413), 1385–1393. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2001.0938 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schendan, H. E. (2012). Semantic memory. In Ramachandran, V. S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (pp. 350–358). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375000-6.00315-3 CrossRef Google Scholar

Schmidt-Wilcke, T., Poljansky, S., Hierlmeier, S., Hausner, J., & Ibach, B. (2009). Memory performance correlates with gray matter density in the ento-/perirhinal cortex and posterior hippocampus in patients with mild cognitive impairment and healthy controls: A voxel based morphometry study. NeuroImage, 47(4), 1914–1920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.092 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schneider, D., Herbst, S. K., Klatt, L.-I., & Wöstmann, M. (2021). Target enhancement or distractor suppression? Functionally distinct alpha oscillations form the basis of attention. European Journal of Neuroscience, 55(11–12), 3256–3265. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15309 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schnur, T. T., Schwartz, M. F., Brecher, A., & Hodgson, C. (2006). Semantic interference during blocked-cyclic naming: Evidence from aphasia. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(2),199–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.002 CrossRef Google Scholar

Seer, C., Sidlauskaite, J., Lange, F., Rodríguez-Nieto, G., & Swinnen, S. P. (2021). Cognition and action: A latent variable approach to study contributions of executive functions to motor control in older adults. Aging, 13(12), 15942–15963. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.203239 CrossRef Google Scholar

Seidenberg, M. S., & Plaut, D. C. (2014). Quasiregularity and its discontents: The legacy of the past tense debate. Cognitive Science, 38(6), 1190–1228. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12147 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Shamma, S. A., Elhilali, M., & Micheyl, C. (2011). Temporal coherence and attention in auditory scene analysis. Trends in Neurosciences, 34(3), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2010.11.002 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2008). Paying attention to reading: The neurobiology of reading and dyslexia. Development and Psychopathology, 20(4), 1329–1349. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579408000631 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Shiffrin, R. M., & Atkinson, R. C. (1969). Storage and retrieval processes in long-term memory. Psychological Review, 76(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027277 CrossRef Google Scholar

Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2008). Object-based auditory and visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(5), 182–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.003 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J. (1997). Working memory: A view from neuroimaging. Cognitive Psychology, 33(1), 5–42. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1997.0658 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Smyth, M. M., & Pendleton, L. R. (1990). Space and movement in working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 42(2), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749008401223 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sohlberg, M. M., & Mateer, C. A. (1987). Effectiveness of an attention-training program. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 9(2), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638708405352 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sohlberg, M. M., & Mateer, C. A. (2001). Cognitive Rehabilitation: An Integrative Neuropsychological Approach. Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Souza, A. S., & Oberauer, K. (2018). Does articulatory rehearsal help immediate serial recall? Cognitive Psychology, 107, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.09.002 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Squire, L. R. (1992). Declarative and nondeclarative memory: Multiple brain systems supporting learning and memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4(3), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1992.4.3.232 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Squire, L. R. (2009a). Memory and brain systems: 1969–2009. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(41), 12711–12716. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3575-09.2009 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Squire, L. R. (2009b). The legacy of patient HM for neuroscience. Neuron, 61(1), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.023 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Squire, L. R., & Alvarez, P. (1995). Retrograde amnesia and memory consolidation: A neurobiological perspective. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5(2), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4388(95)80023-9 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Squire, L. R., Genzel, L., Wixted, J. T., & Morris, R. G. (2015). Memory consolidation. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 7(8), a021766. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a021766 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Squire, L. R., & Zola, S. M. (1996). Structure and function of declarative and nondeclarative memory systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93(24), 13515–13522. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.24.13515 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Squire, L. R., & Zola, S. M. (1998). Episodic memory, semantic memory, and amnesia. Hippocampus, 8(3), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-1063(1998)8:3<205::aid-hipo3>3.0.co;2-i 3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Stein, J. (2014). Dyslexia: The role of vision and visual attention. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 1(4), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-014-0030-6 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Stern, P., & Shalev, L. (2013). The role of sustained attention and display medium in reading comprehension among adolescents with ADHD and without it. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(1), 431–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.08.021 CrossRef Google Scholar

Storm, B. C., & Levy, B. J. (2012). A progress report on the inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 40(6), 827–843. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421–012-0211-7 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Stuss, D. T. (2011). Functions of the frontal lobes: Relation to executive functions. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17(5), 759–765. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617711000695 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Szalárdy, O., Tóth, B., Farkas, D., György, E., & Winkler, I. (2019). Neuronal correlates of informational and energetic masking in the human brain in a multi-talker situation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00786 CrossRef Google Scholar

Teuber, H. L. (1972). Unity and diversity of frontal lobe functions. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 32(2), 615–656.Google Scholar PubMed

Thakur, C. S., Wang, R. M., Afshar, S., Hamilton, T. J., Tapson, J. C., Shamma, S. A., & van Schaik, A. (2015). Sound stream segregation: A neuromorphic approach to solve the “cocktail party problem” in real-time. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00309 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Thut, G., Nietzel, A., Brandt, S. A., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2006). Alpha-band electroencephalographic activity over occipital cortex indexes visuospatial attention bias and predicts visual target detection. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(37), 9494–9502. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0875-06.2006 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Treisman, A. M. (1960). Contextual cues in selective listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(4), 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416732 CrossRef Google Scholar

Tucha, L., Aschenbrenner, S., Koerts, J., & Lange, K. W. (2012). The five-point test: Reliability, validity, and normative data for children and adults. PLoS ONE, 7(9), e46080. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046080 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In Tulving, E. & Donaldson, W. (Eds.), Organization of Memory (pp. 381–403). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Tulving, E. (2002). Does memory encoding exist? In Naveh-Benjamin, M., Moscovitch, M., & Roediger, H. L. III (Eds.), Perspectives on Human Memory and Cognitive Aging: Essays in Honor of Fergus Craik (pp. 6–27). Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Tulving, E., & Pearlstone, Z. (1966). Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5(4), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(66)80048-8 CrossRef Google Scholar

Ullman, M. T. (2001). A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(10), 717–726. https://doi.org/10.1038/35094573 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ullman, M.T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92(1–2), 231–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ullman, M. T. (2016). The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiological model of language learning, knowledge, and use. In Neurobiology of Language (pp. 953–968). Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-407794-2.00076-6CrossRef Google Scholar

Ullman, M. T. (2020). The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiologically motivated theory of first and second language 1. In Theories in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 128–161). Routledge.10.4324/9780429503986-7CrossRef Google Scholar

Ullman, M. T., Corkin, S., Coppola, M., Hickok, G., Growdon, J. H., Koroshetz, W. J., & Pinker, S. (1997). A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(2), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1997.9.2.266 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114(1), 104–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.114.1.104 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Vallat-Azouvi, C., Weber, T., Legrand, L., & Azuovi, P. (2007). Working memory after severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13(05), 770–780. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617707070993 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Verde, M. F. (2012). Retrieval-induced forgetting and inhibition: A critical review. In Ross, B. H. (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation, (Vol. 56, pp. 47–80). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-394393-4.00002-9 Google Scholar

Villard, S., & Kidd, G. Jr. (2019). Effects of acquired aphasia on the recognition of speech under energetic and informational masking conditions. Trends in Hearing, 23, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216519884480 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Villard, S., & Kiran, S. (2015). Between-session intra-individual variability in sustained, selective, and integrational non-linguistic attention in aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 66, 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.026 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Villard, S., & Kiran, S. (2017). To what extent does attention underlie language in aphasia? Aphasiology, 31(10), 1226–1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2016.1242711 CrossRef Google Scholar

Vossel, S., Geng, J. J., & Fink, G. R. (2014). Dorsal and ventral attention systems: Distinct neural circuits but collaborative roles. The Neuroscientist, 20(2), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858413494269 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Vugs, B., Hendriks, M., Cuperus, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2014). Working memory performance and executive function behaviors in young children with SLI. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.10.022 CrossRef Google Scholar

Wager, T. D., & Smith, E. E. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of working memory: A meta-analysis. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3(4), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.3758/cabn.3.4.255 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wagner, A. D., Shannon, B. J., Kahn, I., & Buckner, R. L. (2005). Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(9), 445–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.001 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Waters, G. S., Rochon, E., & Caplan, D. (1992). The role of high-level speech planning in rehearsal: Evidence from patients with apraxia of speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(1), 54–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90005-I CrossRef Google Scholar

Wiebe, S. A., Espy, K. A., & Charak, D. (2008). Using confirmatory factor analysis to understand executive control in preschool children: I. Latent structure. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 575–587. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.575 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T. A., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In Musch, J. & Klauer, K. C. (Eds.), The Psychology of Evaluation: Affective Processes in Cognition and Emotion (pp. 189–217). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar

Worden, M. S., Foxe, J. J., Wang, N., & Simpson, G. V. (2000). Anticipatory biasing of visuospatial attention indexed by retinotopically specific alpha-bank electroencephalography increases over occipital cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(6), RC63. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.20-06-j0002.2000 CrossRef Google Scholar

Yee, E., Chrysikou, E. G., Hoffman, E., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2013). Manual experience shapes object representations. Psychological Science, 24(6), 909–919. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612464658 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Zhang, M., Alamatsaz, N., & Ihlefeld, A. (2021). Hemodynamic responses link individual differences in informational masking to the vicinity of superior temporal gyrus. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.675326 Google Scholar

References

Altmann, G. T., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247–264.10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Altmann, G. T., & Kamide, Y. (2007). The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 502–518.10.1016/j.jml.2006.12.004CrossRef Google Scholar

Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 364–390.10.1016/0010-0285(85)90013-1CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bonhage, C. E., Mueller, J. L., Friederici, A. D., & Fiebach, C. J. (2015). Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension. Cortex, 68, 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.014 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Boudewyn, M. A., Long, D. L., & Swaab, T. Y. (2015). Graded expectations: Predictive processing and the adjustment of expectations during spoken language comprehension. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(3), 607–624. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0340-0 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Brennan, J. R., Dyer, C., Kuncoro, A., & Hale, J. T. (2020). Localizing syntactic predictions using recurrent neural network grammars. Neuropsychologia, 146, 107479.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107479CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Brothers, T., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2021). Word predictability effects are linear, not logarithmic: Implications for probabilistic models of sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 116, 104174.10.1016/j.jml.2020.104174CrossRef Google Scholar

Brothers, T., & Traxler, M. J. (2016). Anticipating syntax during reading: Evidence from the boundary change paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(12), 1894.Google Scholar PubMed

Brothers, T., Dave, S., Hoversten, L. J., Traxler, M. J., & Swaab, T. Y. (2019). Flexible predictions during listening comprehension: Speaker reliability affects anticipatory processes. Neuropsychologia, 135, 107225.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107225CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Brothers, T., Swaab, T. Y., & Traxler, M. J. (2015). Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: Prediction takes precedence. Cognition, 136, 135–149.10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.017CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Brothers, T., Swaab, T. Y., & Traxler, M. J. (2017). Goals and strategies influence lexical prediction during sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 203–216.10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.002CrossRef Google Scholar

Buac, M., Tauzin-Larché, A., Weisberg, E., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2019). Effect of speaker certainty on novel word learning in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(4), 883–895.10.1017/S1366728918000536CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Choi, W., Lowder, M. W., Ferreira, F., Swaab, T. Y., & Henderson, J. M. (2017). Effects of word predictability and preview lexicality on eye movements during reading: A comparison between young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 32, 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000160 CrossRef Google Scholar

Clark, A. (2013). Expecting the world: Perception, prediction, and the origins of human knowledge. The Journal of Philosophy, 110(9), 469–496. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20131109/2 CrossRef Google Scholar

Clement, F, Koenig, M, & Harris, P. (2004). The ontogenesis of trust. Mind & Language, 19, 360–379.10.1111/j.0268-1064.2004.00263.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Dave, S., Brothers, T. A., & Swaab, T. Y. (2018). 1/f neural noise and electrophysiological indices of contextual prediction in aging. Brain Research, 1691, 34–43.10.1016/j.brainres.2018.04.007CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dave, S., Brothers, T. A., Traxler, M. J., Ferreira, F., Henderson, J. M., & Swaab, T. Y. (2018). Electrophysiological evidence for preserved primacy of lexical prediction in aging. Neuropsychologia, 117, 135–147.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.05.023CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dave, S., Brothers, T., Hoversten, L. J., Traxler, M. J., & Swaab, T. Y. (2021). Cognitive control mediates age-related changes in flexible anticipatory processing during listening comprehension. Brain Research, 1768, 147573.10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147573CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Delaney-Busch, N., Morgan, E., Lau, E. F., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2017). Comprehenders rationally adapt semantic predictions to the statistics of the local environment: A Bayesian model of trial-by-trial N400 amplitudes. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, London.Google Scholar

DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1117–1121.10.1038/nn1504CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Drieghe, D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2005). Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 954–969.Google Scholar PubMed

Dussias, P. E., Kroff, J. R. V., Tamargo, R. E. G., & Gerfen, C. (2013). When gender and looking go hand in hand: Grammatical gender processing in L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000915 CrossRef Google Scholar

Eddine, S. N., Brothers, T., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2022). The N400 in silico: A review of computational models. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 76, 123–206.Google Scholar

Elman, J. L. (2004). An alternative view of the mental lexicon. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 301–306.10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.003CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Elman, J. L., & McClelland, J. L. (1988). Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: Compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 143–165.10.1016/0749-596X(88)90071-XCrossRef Google Scholar

Fazekas, J., Jessop, A., Pine, J., & Rowland, C. (2020). Do children learn from their prediction mistakes? A registered report evaluating error-based theories of language acquisition. Royal Society Open Science, 7(11), 180877. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180877 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 44(4), 491–505.10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00531.xCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Federmeier, K. D., Wlotko, E. W., De Ochoa-Dewald, E., & Kutas, M. (2007). Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing. Brain Research, 1146, 75–84.10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.101CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ferreira, F., & Chantavarin, S. (2018). Integration and prediction in language processing: A synthesis of old and new. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(6), 443–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418794491 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fitz, H., & Chang, F. (2019). Language ERPs reflect learning through prediction error propagation. Cognitive Psychology, 111, 15–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.03.002 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Friston, K. (2018). Does predictive coding have a future?Nature Neuroscience, 21(8), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0200-7 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gibson, E., Bergen, L., & Piantadosi, S. T. (2013). Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 8051–8056.10.1073/pnas.1216438110CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gwilliams, L., Marantz, A., Poeppel, D., & King, J.-R. (2023). Top-down information shapes lexical processing when listening to continuous speech. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 39, 1045–1058.10.1080/23273798.2023.2171072CrossRef Google Scholar

Hale, J. (2001). A probabilistic Earley parser as a psycholinguistic model. In Second meeting of the North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.10.3115/1073336.1073357CrossRef Google Scholar

Hale, J. (2003). The information conveyed by words in sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 101–123.10.1023/A:1022492123056CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hale, J. (2006). Uncertainty about the rest of the sentence. Cognitive Science, 30, 643–672.10.1207/s15516709cog0000_64CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hale, J. (2016). Information‐theoretical complexity metrics. Language and Linguistics Compass, 10(9), 397–412.10.1111/lnc3.12196CrossRef Google Scholar

Heikel, E., Sassenhagen, J., & Fiebach, C. J. (2018). Decoding semantic predictions from EEG prior to word onset (p. 393066). bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/393066 CrossRef Google Scholar

Heilbron, M., Armeni, K., Schoffelen, J.-M., Hagoort, P., & de Lange, F. P. (2022). A hierarchy of linguistic predictions during natural language comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(32), e2201968119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2201968119 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hess, D. J., Foss, D. J., & Carroll, P. (1995). Effects of global and local context on lexical processing during language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 62.10.1037/0096-3445.124.1.62CrossRef Google Scholar

Hintzman, D. L. (1986). “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411–428.10.1037/0033-295X.93.4.411CrossRef Google Scholar

Huang, K. J., Arehalli, S., Kugemoto, M., Muxica, C., Prasad, G., Dillon, B., & Linzen, T. (2023). Surprisal does not explain syntactic disambiguation difficulty: Evidence from a large-scale benchmark. Preprint on PsyArXiv.10.31234/osf.io/z38u6CrossRef Google Scholar

Huettig, F. (2015). Four central questions about prediction in language processing. Brain Research, 1626, 118–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.014 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Jaswal, V. K., & Neely, L. A. (2006). Adults don’t always know best: Preschoolers use past reliability over age when learning new words. Psychological Science, 17(9), 757–758.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01778.xCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Johnson, K., & Sjerps, M. J. (2021). Speaker normalization in speech perception. In Pardo, J. S., Nygaard, L. C., Remez, R. E., & Pisoni, D. B., (Eds.), The Handbook of Speech Perception, 145–176. John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119184096.ch6CrossRef Google Scholar

Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 133–156.10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00023-8CrossRef Google Scholar

Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163.10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363.10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363CrossRef Google Scholar

Kinzler, K. D., Corriveau, K. H., & Harris, P. L. (2011). Children’s selective trust in native‐accented speakers. Developmental Science, 14(1), 106–111.10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00965.xCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kinzler, K. D., Dupoux, E., & Spelke, E. S. (2007). The native language of social cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(30), 12577–12580.10.1073/pnas.0705345104CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Koenig, M. A., & Harris, P. L. (2005). Preschoolers mistrust ignorant and inaccurate speakers. Child Development, 76, 1261–1277.10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00849.xCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Koenig, M. A., & Woodward, A. L. (2010). Sensitivity of 24-month-olds to the prior inaccuracy of the source: Possible mechanisms. Developmental Psychology, 46(4), 815.10.1037/a0019664CrossRef Google Scholar

Koenig, M. A., Clément, F., & Harris, P. L. (2004). Trust in testimony: Children’s use of true and false statements. Psychological Science, 15(10), 694–698.10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00742.xCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kroczek, L. O., & Gunter, T. C. (2021). The time course of speaker-specific language processing. Cortex, 141, 311–321.10.1016/j.cortex.2021.04.017CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kuperberg, G. R. (2021). Tea with milk? A hierarchical generative framework of sequential event comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science, 13, 256–298.10.1111/tops.12518CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31, 32–59.10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kutas, M., DeLong, K. A., & Smith, N. J. (2011). A look around at what lies ahead: Prediction and predictability in language processing. Predictions in the Brain: Using Our Past to Generate a Future, 190207(10.1093).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195395518.003.0065CrossRef Google Scholar

Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203–205. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7350657 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kutas, M., & Iragui, V. (1998). The N400 in a semantic categorization task across 6 decades. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 108(5), 456–471.10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00023-9CrossRef Google Scholar

Kutas, M., Van Petten, C. K., & Kluender, R. (2006). Psycholinguistics electrified II (1994–2005). In Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 659–724). Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012369374-7/50018-3CrossRef Google Scholar

Lau, E., Stroud, C., Plesch, S., & Phillips, C. (2006). The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis. Brain and Language, 98(1), 74–88.10.1016/j.bandl.2006.02.003CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211.10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211CrossRef Google Scholar

Levelt, W. J. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42, 1–22.10.1016/0010-0277(92)90038-JCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106, 1126–1177.10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28(2), 203–208.10.3758/BF03204766CrossRef Google Scholar

Lupyan, G., & Clark, A. (2015). Words and the World: Predictive Coding and the Language-Perception-Cognition Interface. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(4), 279–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415570732 CrossRef Google Scholar

MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101(4), 676.10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25(1–2), 71–102.10.1016/0010-0277(87)90005-9CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375.10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375CrossRef Google Scholar

Metusalem, R., Kutas, M., Urbach, T. P., Hare, M., McRae, K., & Elman, J. L. (2012). Generalized event knowledge activation during online sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 545–567.10.1016/j.jml.2012.01.001CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Morales, L., Paolieri, D., Dussias, P. E., Kroff, J. R. V., Gerfen, C., & Bajo, M. T. (2016). The gender congruency effect during bilingual spoken-word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(2), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000176 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Morris, R. K. (1994). Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 92–103.Google Scholar PubMed

Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165–178.10.1037/h0027366CrossRef Google Scholar

Ness, T., & Meltzer‐Asscher, A. (2021a). From pre‐activation to pre‐updating: A threshold mechanism for commitment to strong predictions. Psychophysiology, 58(5), e13797.10.1111/psyp.13797CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ness, T., & Meltzer-Asscher, A. (2021b). Rational adaptation in lexical prediction: The influence of prediction strength. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 622873.10.3389/fpsyg.2021.622873CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nieuwland, M. S., Arkhipova, Y., & Rodríguez-Gómez, P. (2020). Anticipating words during spoken discourse comprehension: A large-scale, pre-registered replication study using brain potentials. Cortex, 133, 1–36.10.1016/j.cortex.2020.09.007CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nieuwland, M. S., Politzer-Ahles, S., Heyselaar, E., Segaert, K., Darley, E., Kazanina, N., Von Grebmer Zu Wolfsthurn, S., Bartolozzi, F., Kogan, V., & Ito, A. (2018). Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension. ELife, 7, e33468.10.7554/eLife.33468CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Perdomo, M., & Kaan, E. (2021). Prosodic cues in second-language speech processing: A visual world eye-tracking study. Second Language Research, 37, 349–375.10.1177/0267658319879196CrossRef Google Scholar

Pickering, M. J., & Gambi, C. (2018). Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review. Psychological Bulletin, 144(10), 1002. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000158 CrossRef Google Scholar

Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 105–110.10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.002CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 329–392. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12003238 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (1998). Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 940–961.Google Scholar

Poulton, V. R., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2022). Can you hear what’s coming? Failure to replicate ERP evidence for phonological prediction. Neurobiology of Language, 3, 556–574.10.1162/nol_a_00078CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rao, R. P. N., & Ballard, D. H. (1999). Predictive coding in the visual cortex: A functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nature Neuroscience, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/4580 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In Black, A. H. & Prokasy, W. F. (Eds.), Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory (Vol. 2, pp. 64–99). Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar

Ryskin, R., Levy, R. P., & Fedorenko, E. (2020). Do domain-general executive resources play a role in linguistic prediction? Re-evaluation of the evidence and a path forward. Neuropsychologia, 136, 107258.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107258CrossRef Google Scholar

Ryskin, R., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2023). Prediction during language comprehension: What is next?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2023.08.003 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sabbagh, M. A., & Baldwin, D. A. (2001). Learning words from knowledgeable versus ignorant speakers: Links between preschoolers’ theory of mind and semantic development. Child Development, 72(4), 1054–1070.10.1111/1467-8624.00334CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1991). Contextual constraint and lexical processing. In Advances in Psychology (Vol. 77, pp. 23–45). North-Holland.Google Scholar

Schwanenflugel, P. J., & LaCount, K. L. (1988). Semantic relatedness and the scope of facilitation for upcoming words in sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 344–354.Google Scholar

Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1985). The influence of sentence constraint on the scope of facilitation for upcoming words. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 232–252.10.1016/0749-596X(85)90026-9CrossRef Google Scholar

Scofield, J., & Behrend, D. A. (2008). Learning words from reliable and unreliable speakers. Cognitive Development, 23(2), 278–290.10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.01.003CrossRef Google Scholar

Singleton, J. L., & Newport, E. L. (2004). When learners surpass their models: The acquisition of American Sign Language from inconsistent input. Cognitive Psychology, 49(4), 370–407.10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.05.001CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Steedman, M., & Altmann, G. (1989). Ambiguity in context: A reply. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4(3–4), SI105–SI122. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690968908406365 CrossRef Google Scholar

Stoet, G., (2017). PsyToolkit: A novel web-based method for running online questionnaires and reaction-time experiments. Teaching of Psychology, 44, 24–31.10.1177/0098628316677643CrossRef Google Scholar

Stroop, J. R., (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643.10.1037/h0054651CrossRef Google Scholar

Swanson, L. R. (2016). The predictive processing paradigm has roots in Kant. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 10. www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2016.0007910.3389/fnsys.2016.00079CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Szewczyk, J. M., & Schriefers, H. (2013). Prediction in language comprehension beyond specific words: An ERP study on sentence comprehension in Polish. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(4), 297–314.10.1016/j.jml.2012.12.002CrossRef Google Scholar

Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268(5217), 1632–1634.10.1126/science.7777863CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Trammel, T., Khodayari, N., Luck, S. J., Traxler, M. J., & Swaab, T. Y. (2023). Decoding semantic relatedness and prediction from EEG: A classification method comparison. NeuroImage, 277, 120268.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120268CrossRef Google Scholar

Traxler, M. J. (2014). Trends in syntactic parsing: Anticipation, Bayesian estimation, and good-enough parsing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 605–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.08.001 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Traxler, M. J. (2023). Introduction to Psycholinguistics: Understanding Language Science (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Traxler, M. J., Foss, D. J., Seely, R. E., Kaup, B., & Morris, R. K. (2000). Priming in sentence processing: Intralexical spreading activation, schemas, and situation models. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 581–595.10.1023/A:1026416225168CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Van Berkum, J. J., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 443.Google Scholar PubMed

Van Wonderen, E., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2023). Lexical prediction does not rationally adapt to prediction error: ERP evidence from pre-nominal articles. Journal of Memory and Language, 132, 104435.10.1016/j.jml.2023.104435CrossRef Google Scholar

Wang, L., Schoot, L., Brothers, T., Alexander, E., Warnke, L., Kim, M., … & Kuperberg, G. R. (2023). Predictive coding across the left fronto-temporal hierarchy during language comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 33, 4478–4497.10.1093/cercor/bhac356CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wang, L., Wlotko, E., Alexander, E., Schoot, L., Kim, M., Warnke, L., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2020). Neural evidence for the prediction of animacy features during language comprehension: Evidence from MEG and EEG representational similarity analysis. Journal of Neuroscience, 40(16), 3278–3291. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1733-19.2020 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wicha, N. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(7), 1272–1288.10.1162/0898929041920487CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D. (2012). So that’s what you meant! Event-related potentials reveal multiple aspects of context use during construction of message-level meaning. NeuroImage, 62(1), 356–366.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.054CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Zipf, G. K. (1935). (reprinted 1965). The Psycho-Biology of Language. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.2 AAA

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The PDF of this book complies with version 2.2 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), offering more comprehensive accessibility measures for a broad range of users and attains the highest (AAA) level of WCAG compliance, optimising the user experience by meeting the most extensive accessibility guidelines.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.

Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.

Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.

Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.

Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.

Book contents

Part III - Language and Cognitive Plasticity and Processing

Information

Access options

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

References

References

References

References

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.2 AAA

Why this information is here

Accessibility Information

Content Navigation

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Visual Accessibility

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive