References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 November 2025
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Artist's LifeThe Heartbeat of the Creative Person, pp. 156 - 158Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Acar, S., Tadik, H., Uysal, R., Myers, D., & Inetas, B. (2023). Socio-economic status and creativity: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 57(1), 138–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, J. (2022). There’s No Such Thing as Creativity: How Plato and 20th Century Psychology Have Misled Us. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2017). The Amusement Park Theoretical Model of Creativity: An attempt to bridge the domain specificity/generality gap. In Kaufman, J. C., Glaveanu, V. P., & Baer, J. (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Creativity across Domains (pp. 8–17). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) Model of Creativity. Roeper Review, 27, 158–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbot, B. (2018). “Generic” creativity as a predictor or outcome of identity development? Creativity: Theories–Research–Applications, 5, 159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charland, W. (2010). African American youth and the artist’s identity: Cultural models and aspirational foreclosure. Studies in Art Education, 51(2), 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Q., Beaty, R. E., & Qiu, J. (2020). Mapping the artistic brain: Common and distinct neural activations associated with musical, drawing, and literary creativity. Human Brain Mapping, 41(12), 3403–3419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality and Development. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Roring, R. W., & Nandagopal, K. (2007). Giftedness and evidence for reproducibly superior performance: An account based on the expert-performance framework. High Ability Studies, 18, 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregerson, M., Snyder, H., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.) (2013). Teaching Creatively and Teaching Creativity. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwell, K., & Southwick, D. (2021). Beyond 10,000 hours: Addressing misconceptions of the expert performance approach. Journal of Expertise, 4, 2.Google Scholar
Kapoor, H., & Kaufman, J. C. (2020). Meaning-making through creativity during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 595990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kapoor, H., Gurjar, S., Mahadeshwar, H., Rezaei, S., & Kaufman, J. C. (2024). Who is the most creative of them all? Art bias in laypersons’ explicit and implicit beliefs. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karwowski, M. (2021). School does not kill creativity. European Psychologist, 27(3), 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. H., Mann, T. C., Shen, X., Goncalo, J. A., & Ferguson, M. J. (2022). Implicit impressions of creative people: Creativity evaluation in a stigmatized domain. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 169, 104116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2023). The Creativity Advantage. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2018). Finding meaning with creativity in the past, present, and future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 734–749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2002). Could Steven Spielberg manage the Yankees?: Creative thinking in different domains. Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 12, 5–15.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The Four C Model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2023). Where is the when of creativity? Specifying the temporal dimension of the Four Cs of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 27(2), 194–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostroff, M. (2019). Audition Psych 101: A Refreshing Approach to the Dreaded Process. Tampa, FL: Gatekeeper Press.Google Scholar
Kostroff, M., & Garnye, J. (2022). The Stage Actor’s Handbook. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y. S., Chang, J. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2017). Why reject creative ideas? Fear as a driver of implicit bias against creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 29(3), 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibson, B. (2004). I’m Too Young to Have Breast Cancer! Washington, DC: LifeLine Press.Google Scholar
Martela, F., & Steger, M. F. (2016). The three meanings of meaning in life: Distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(5), 531–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, J. S., Melwani, S., & Goncalo, J. A. (2012). The bias against creativity: Why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psychological Science, 23(1), 13–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patston, T. J., Cropley, D. H., Marrone, R. L., & Kaufman, J. C. (2018). Teacher implicit beliefs of creativity: Is there an arts bias? Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 366–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penny, L. (2008). The highest of all the arts: Kant and poetry. Philosophy and Literature, 32(2), 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, M., Plucker, J. A., & Yang, X. (2019). Is creativity domain specific or domain general? Evidence from multilevel explanatory item response theory models. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez, M. (2023, November 5). How many hours do we spend in school? Save Our Schools. www.saveourschoolsmarch.org/how-many-hours-do-we-spend-in-school/Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2014). Creative performance, expertise acquisition, individual differences, and developmental antecedents: An integrative research agenda. Intelligence, 45, 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slayton, M. A, Bristol, A. S., & Viskontas, I. V. (2019). Factors affecting group creativity: Lessons from musical ensembles. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slayton, M. A., Romero-Sosa, J. L., Shore, K., Buonomano, D. V., & Viskontas, I. V. (2020). Musical expertise generalizes to superior temporal scaling in a Morse code tapping task. PLOS One, 15(1), e0221000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2002). The Creativity Conundrum. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.2 AAA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The PDF of this book
complies with version 2.2 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), offering more comprehensive accessibility measures for a broad range
of users and attains the highest
(AAA)
level of WCAG compliance, optimising the user experience by meeting the most extensive
accessibility guidelines.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.