Frisch Lecture

doi:10.1017/9781009589727.001

Part I - Frisch Lecture

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 November 2025

Edited by

Victor Chernozhukov ,

Johannes Hörner ,

Eliana La Ferrara and

Iván Werning

Show author details

Victor Chernozhukov: Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Johannes Hörner: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Eliana La Ferrara: Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Iván Werning: Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Advances in Economics and Econometrics
Twelfth World Congress
, pp. 1 - 2

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009589727.001 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2026

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abdellaouia, M., Barrios, C., and Wakker, P. P. (2007). “Reconciling introspective utility with revealed preference: Experimental arguments based on prospect theory,” Journal of Econometrics, 138(1), 356–378.10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.05.025CrossRef Google Scholar

Anscombe, F. J., and Aumann, R. J. (1963). “A definition of subjective probability,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34(1), 199–205.10.1214/aoms/1177704255CrossRef Google Scholar

Argenziano, R., and Gilboa, I. (2019). “Perception-theoretic foundations of weighted utilitarianism,” The Economic Journal, 129(620), 1511–1528.10.1111/ecoj.12622CrossRef Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. (1950). “A difficulty in the concept of social welfare,” Journal of Political Economy, 58(4), 328–346.10.1086/256963CrossRef Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values. Cowles Commission Monograph No. 12, 1st ed.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. (1963). Social Choice and Individual Values. Cowles Commission Monograph No. 12, 2nd ed.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. (1967). “Public and private values.” In Hook, S. (ed.), Human Values and Economic Policy. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. (1977). “Extended sympathy and the possibility of social choice,” The American Economic Review, 67(1), 219–225.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. (1983). “Contributions to welfare economics.” In Brown, E. C. and Solow, R. M. (eds.), Paul Samuelson and Modern Economic Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 15–30.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. (1984). “The principle of rationality in collective decisions.” In Collected Papers of Kenneth J. Arrow, vol. 1: Social Choice and Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Atkinson, A. B. (2009). “Economics as a moral science,” Economica, 76(s1), 791–804.10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00788.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Ayer, A. J. (1978). Interviewed by Bryan Magee on his television series Men of Ideas. BBC.Google Scholar

Bailey, M. J. (1979). “The possibility of rational social choice in an economy,” Journal of Political Economy, 87(1), 37–56.10.1086/260738CrossRef Google Scholar

Bergson, A. (1938). “A reformulation of certain aspects of welfare economics,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 52(2), 310–334.10.2307/1881737CrossRef Google Scholar

Bernheim, B. D. (1984). “Rationalizable strategic behavior,” Econometrica, 52(4), 1007–1028.10.2307/1911196CrossRef Google Scholar

Bernheim, B. D., and Rangel, A. (2007). “Toward choice-theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics,” The American Economic Review, 97(2), 464–470.10.1257/aer.97.2.464CrossRef Google Scholar

Bernstein, R. J. (1983). Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Binmore, K. (1998). “The evolution of fairness norms,” Rationality and Society, 10(3), 275–301.10.1177/104346398010003001CrossRef Google Scholar

Bjerkholt, O. (2008). “Ragnar Frisch on scientific economics.” Working Paper, University of Oslo.Google Scholar

Bjerkholt, O., and Qin, D. (2010). “Teaching economics as a science: The 1930 Yale lectures of Ragnar Frisch.” Memorandum 05/2010, Oslo University, Department of Economics.Google Scholar

Boadway, R. (2016). “Cost–benefit analysis.” In Adler, M. and Fleurbaey, M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Well-being and Public Policy. Oxford Handbooks Online.Google Scholar

Bossert, W. (1991). “On intra- and interpersonal utility comparisons,” Social Choice and Welfare, 8, 207–219.10.1007/BF00177659CrossRef Google Scholar

Bossert, W., and Weymark, J. (2004). “Utility in social choice.” In Barbera, S., Hammond, P., and Seidl, C. (eds.), Handbook of Utility, vol 2. New York: Springer, p. 1122.Google Scholar

Brent, R. (2011). Handbook of Cost–Benefit Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Broome, J. (2008). “Can there be a preference-based utilitarianism? In Fleurbaey, M., Salles, M., and Weymark, J. A. (eds.), Justice, Political Liberalism, and Utilitarianism: Themes from Harsanyi and Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 221–238.10.1017/CBO9780511619595.010CrossRef Google Scholar

Chauvin, K. (2020). “Unacknowledged heterogeneity in communication.” Working Paper, Department of Economics, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Coakley, M. (2016). “Interpersonal comparisons of the good: Epistemic not impossible,” Utilitas, 3, 288–313.10.1017/S0953820815000266CrossRef Google Scholar

Cowles, A. (1960). “Ragnar Frisch and the founding of the Econometric Society,” Econometrica, 28(2), 173–174.10.2307/1907715CrossRef Google Scholar

D’Aspremont, C., and Gevers, L. (1977). “Equity and the informational basis of collective choice,” The Review of Economic Studies, 44(2), 199–209.10.2307/2297061CrossRef Google Scholar

de Scitovsky, T. (1941). “A note on welfare propositions in economics,” The Review of Economic Studies, 9(1), 77–88.10.2307/2967640CrossRef Google Scholar

Diamond, P. A. (1967). “Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparison of utility: Comment,” Journal of Political Economy, 75(5), 765–766.10.1086/259353CrossRef Google Scholar

Echenique, F., and Saito, K. (2017). “Response time and utility,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 139, 49–59.10.1016/j.jebo.2017.04.008CrossRef Google Scholar

Edgeworth, F. Y. (1881). Mathematical Psychics. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Eriksson, N., Wu, S., Do, C. B., Kiefer, A. K., Tung, J. Y., Mountain, J. L., et al. (2012). “A genetic variant near olfactory receptor genes influences cilantro preference,” BMC Flavour, 1, 22.Google Scholar

Feldman, A. M., and Serrano, R. (2008). “Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem: Two simple single-profile versions,” Harvard College Mathematics Review, 2(2), 46–57.Google Scholar

Fishburn, P. (1970). Utility Theory for Decision Making. New York: Wiley.10.21236/AD0708563CrossRef Google Scholar

Fleurbaey, M., and Hammond, P. (2004). “Interpersonally comparable utility.” In Barbera, S., Hammond, P., and Seidl, C. (eds.), Handbook of Utility, vol. 2. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Fleurbaey, M., and Maniquet, F. (2008). “Utilitarianism versus fairness in welfare economics.” In Fleurbaey, M., Salles, M., and Weymark, J. A. (eds.), Justice, Political Liberalism, and Utilitarianism: Themes from Harsanyi and Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 263–280.10.1017/CBO9780511619595.012CrossRef Google Scholar

Fleurbaey, M., and Mongin, P. (2005). “The news of the death of welfare economics is greatly exaggerated,” Social Choice and Welfare, 25(4), 381–418.10.1007/s00355-005-0010-1CrossRef Google Scholar

Friedman, M. (1955). “What all is utility?,” The Economic Journal, 65(259), 405–409.10.2307/2227317CrossRef Google Scholar

Frisch, R. (1926a). “Kvantitativ formulering av den teoretiske økonomikks lover,” Statsøkonomisk Tidsskrift, 40, 299–334.Google Scholar

Frisch, R. (1926b). “Sur un problème d’Économie pure,” Norsk Mathematisk Forenings Skrifter, 1, 1–40.Google Scholar

Frisch, R. (1964). “Dynamic utility,” Econometrica, 32(3), 418–424.CrossRef Google Scholar

Frisch, R. (1970). “From utopian theory to practical applications: The case of econometrics.” Lecture to the Memory of Alfred Nobel, June 17.Google Scholar

Fryxell, L. (2019). “A theory of experienced utility and utilitarianism.” Working Paper, Northwestern University.Google Scholar

Gaertner, W. (2002). “Domain restrictions.” In Arrow, K. J., Sen, A. K., and Suzumura, K. (eds.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 131–170.10.1016/S1574-0110(02)80007-8CrossRef Google Scholar

Galperti, S., and Strulovici, B. (2017). “A theory of intergenerational altruism,” Econo-metrica, 85(4), 1175–1218.10.3982/ECTA13937CrossRef Google Scholar

Gerasimou, G. (2021). “Simple preference intensity comparisons,” Journal of Economic Theory, 192, 105199.10.1016/j.jet.2021.105199CrossRef Google Scholar

Gibbard, A. F. (1968/2014). “Social choice and the Arrow conditions,” Economics and Philosophy, 30(3), 269–284. Printed from an unpublished manuscript written in 1968.10.1017/S026626711400025XCrossRef Google Scholar

Gilboa, I. (2009). Theory of Decision under Uncertainty. Econometric Society Monograph. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gilboa, I. (2014). “On the interpretation of probabilities.” Posting on the Decision Theory Forum, November 27.Google Scholar

Goodman, L. A., and Markowitz, H. (1952). “Social welfare functions based on individual rankings,” American Journal of Sociology, 58(3), 257–262.10.1086/221147CrossRef Google Scholar

Grant, S., Kajii, A., Polak, B., and Safra, Z. (2006). “Generalized utilitarianism and Harsanyi’s impartial observer theorem.” Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 1578, Yale University.Google Scholar

Grant, S., Kajii, A., Polak, B., and Safra, Z. (2010). “Generalized utilitarianism and Harsanyi’s impartial observer theorem,” Econometrica, 78(6), 1939–1971.Google Scholar

Greaves, H. (2017). “A reconsideration of the Harsanyi–Sen–Weymark debate on utilitarianism,” Utilitas, 29(2), 175–213.10.1017/S0953820816000169CrossRef Google Scholar

Gul, F., and Pesendorfer, W. (2001). “Temptation and self-control,” Econometrica, 69(6), 1403–1435.10.1111/1468-0262.00252CrossRef Google Scholar

Gul, F., and Pesendorfer, W. (2007). “Welfare without happiness,” American Economic Review, 97(2), 471–476.10.1257/aer.97.2.471CrossRef Google Scholar

Hammond, P. J. (1976). “Equity, Arrow’s conditions, and Rawls’ difference principle,” Econometrica, 44(4), 793–804.10.2307/1913445CrossRef Google Scholar

Hammond, P. J. (1991). “Independence of irrelevant interpersonal comparisons,” Social Choice and Welfare, 8(1), 1–19.10.1007/BF00182445CrossRef Google Scholar

Hansson, B. (1973). “The independence condition in the theory of social choice,” Theory and Decision, 4, 25–49.10.1007/BF00133397CrossRef Google Scholar

Harsanyi, J. C. (1953). “Cardinal utility in welfare economics and in the theory of risk-taking,” Journal of Political Economy, 61(5), 434–435.10.1086/257416CrossRef Google Scholar

Harsanyi, J. C. (1955). “Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility,” Journal of Political Economy, 63(4), 309–321.10.1086/257678CrossRef Google Scholar

Hausman, D. M. (2011). Preference, Value, Choice, and Welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139058537CrossRef Google Scholar

Hicks, J. R. (1939). “The foundations of welfare economics,” The Economic Journal, 49(196), 696–712.10.2307/2225023CrossRef Google Scholar

Hildreth, C. (1953). “Alternative conditions for social orderings,” Econometrica, 21(1), 81–94.10.2307/1906944CrossRef Google Scholar

Igersheim, H. (2019). “The death of welfare economics: History of a controversy,” History of Political Economy, 51(5), 827–865.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Diener, E., and Schwarz, N. (1999). Well-Being: Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., and Sarin, R. (1997). “Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 375–405.10.1162/003355397555235CrossRef Google Scholar

Kaldor, N. (1939). “Welfare propositions of economics and interpersonal comparisons of utility,” The Economic Journal, 49(195), 549–552.10.2307/2224835CrossRef Google Scholar

Kemp, M. C., and Ng, Y.-K. (1976). “On the existence of social welfare functions, social orderings and social decision functions,” Economica, 43(169), 59–66.10.2307/2553016CrossRef Google Scholar

Knight, F. (1947). Freedom and Reform: Essays in Economic and Social Philosophy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Kreps, D. M. (1988). Notes on the Theory of Choice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Kreps, D. M. (2013). Microeconomic Foundations I. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Le Breton, M., and Weymark, J. (1996). “An introduction to Arrovian social welfare functions on economic and political domains.” In Schofield, N. (ed.), Collective Decision-Making: Social Choice and Political Economy. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 25–61.10.1007/978-94-015-8767-9_2CrossRef Google Scholar

Lehtinen, A. (2007). “A farewell to IIA.” Working Paper, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar

List, C. (2003). “Are interpersonal comparisons of utility indeterminate?,” Erkenntnis, 58, 229–260.CrossRef Google Scholar

Little, I., and Mirrlees, J. (1974). Project Appraisal and Planning for Developing Countries. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Machina, M. J. (1981). “‘Rational’ decision making versus ‘rational’ decision modelling?,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 13(24), 163–175.10.1016/0022-2496(81)90041-9CrossRef Google Scholar

Mankiw, D. G. (2015). Principles of Economics, 7th ed. London: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., and Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Maskin, E. (2014). “The Arrow Impossibility Theorem: Where do we go from here?” In Maskin, E. and Sen, A. (eds.), The Arrow Impossibility Theorem. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 43–55.10.7312/mask15328-004CrossRef Google Scholar

Maskin, E. (2020). “A modified version of Arrow’s IIA condition,” Social Choice and Welfare, 54, 203–209.10.1007/s00355-020-01241-7CrossRef Google Scholar

Mayston, D. J. (1974). The Idea of Social Choice. London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-01547-4CrossRef Google Scholar

McCloskey, D. (2012). “Happyism: The creepy new economics of pleasure.” The New Republic, June 8.Google Scholar

McComiskey, B. (1997). “Gorgias, ‘On non-existence’: Sextus Empiricus, ‘Against the logicians’ 1.65-87, translated from the Greek text in Hermann Diels’s ‘Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker’,” Philosophy & Rhetoric, 30(1), 45–49.Google Scholar

Nagel, T. (1974). “What is it like to be a bat?,” The Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435–450.10.2307/2183914CrossRef Google Scholar

Nash, J. F. (1950). “The bargaining problem,” Econometrica, 18(2), 155–162.10.2307/1907266CrossRef Google Scholar

Nash, J. F. (1953). “Two-person cooperative games,” Econometrica, 21(1), 128–140.10.2307/1906951CrossRef Google Scholar

Nebel, J. M. (2021). “Utils and shmutils,” Ethics, 131(3), 571–599.10.1086/712578CrossRef Google Scholar

Ng, Y.-K. (1975). “Bentham or Bergson? Finite sensibility, utility functions and social welfare functions,” The Review of Economic Studies, 42(4), 545–569.CrossRef Google Scholar

Parks, R. P. (1976). “An impossibility theorem for fixed preferences: A dictatorial Bergson–Samuelson welfare function,” The Review of Economic Studies, 43(3), 447–450.10.2307/2297221CrossRef Google Scholar

Pazner, E. (1979). “Equity, nonfeasible alternatives and social choice: A reconsideration of the concept of social welfare.” In Laffont, J. J. (ed.), Aggregation and Revelation of Preferences. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Pearce, D. G. (1983). “Nonpaternalistic sympathy and the inefficiency of consistent intertemporal plans.” Final Chapter of Princeton Doctoral Dissertation, reprinted in Jackson, M. and McClennan, A. (eds.), Foundations in Economic Theory: A Volume in Honor of Hugo F. Sonnenschein. New York: Springer (2008).Google Scholar

Pearce, D. G. (1984). “Rationalizable strategic behavior and the problem of perfection,” Econometrica, 52(4), 1029–1050.10.2307/1911197CrossRef Google Scholar

Pearce, D. G. (1995). “Arrow’s theorem on its head: A Bayesian perspective on social choice.” Working Paper, Yale University.Google Scholar

Pollak, R. A. (1979). “Bergson–Samuelson social welfare functions and the theory of social choice,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93(1), 73–90.10.2307/1882599CrossRef Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674042605CrossRef Google Scholar

Ray, D. (1987). “Nonpaternalistic intergenerational altruism,” Journal of Economic Theory, 41(1), 112–132.10.1016/0022-0531(87)90008-1CrossRef Google Scholar

Robbins, L. (1932). An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Roberts, K. W. S. (1980a). “Interpersonal comparability and social choice theory,” The Review of Economic Studies, 47(2), 421–439.10.2307/2297002CrossRef Google Scholar

Roberts, K. W. S. (1980b). “Social choice theory: The single-profile and multi-profile approaches,” The Review of Economic Studies, 47(2), 441–450.10.2307/2297003CrossRef Google Scholar

Roberts, K. W. S. (1997). “Objective interpersonal comparisons of utility,” Social Choice and Welfare, 14(1), 79–96.10.1007/s003550050053CrossRef Google Scholar

Robertson, D. H. (1951). “Utility and all that,” The Manchester School, 19(2), 111–142.10.1111/j.1467-9957.1951.tb00006.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Rothenberg, J. (1961). The Measurement of Social Welfare. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Rubinstein, A. (1984). “The single profile analogues to multi profile theorems: Mathematical logic’s approach,” International Economic Review, 25(3), 719–730.10.2307/2526229CrossRef Google Scholar

Rubinstein, A. (2007). “Instinctive and cognitive reasoning: A study of response times,” The Economic Journal, 117(523), 1243–1259.10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02081.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Saari, D. G. (1995). “Inner consistency or not inner consistency: A reformulation is the answer.” In Barnett, W. A., Moulin, H., Salles, M., and Schofield, N. J. (eds.), Social Choice, Welfare, and Ethics: Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium in Economic Theory and Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 187–212.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1937). “A note on measurement of utility,” The Review of Economic Studies, 4(2), 155–161.10.2307/2967612CrossRef Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1938). “The numerical representation of ordered classifications and the concept of utility,” The Review of Economic Studies, 6(1), 65–70.10.2307/2967540CrossRef Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1947). Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1952). “Probability, utility, and the independence axiom,” Econometrica, 4(20), 670–678.10.2307/1907649CrossRef Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1963). “D. H. Robertson,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 77(4), 517–536.10.2307/1879448CrossRef Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1967). “Arrow’s mathematical politics.” In Hook, S. (ed.), Human Values and Economic Policy. New York: New York University Press, pp. 41–52.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1977). “Reaffirming the existence of ‘reasonable’ Bergson–Samuelson social welfare functions,” Economica, 44(173), 81–88.10.2307/2553553CrossRef Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1981). “Bergsonian welfare economics.” In Rosefielde, S. (ed.), Economic Welfare and the Economics of Soviet Socialism: Essays in Honor of Abram Bergson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 223–266.10.1017/CBO9780511895821.011CrossRef Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1987). “Sparks from Arrow’s anvil.” In Fiewel, G. R. (ed.), Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 154–178.10.1007/978-1-349-07357-3_4CrossRef Google Scholar

Savage, L. J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Schotter, A. (2003). “Decision making with naive advice,” American Economic Review, 93(2), 196–201.10.1257/000282803321947047CrossRef Google Scholar

Sen, A. (1970). Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day. Sen, A. (1987). “Social choice.” In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., and Newman, P. (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, vol. 4. London: Macmillan, pp. 382–393.Google Scholar

Sen, A. (2011). “The informational basis of social choice.” In Arrow, K. J., Sen, A., and Suzumura, K. (eds.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 29–46.Google Scholar

Sen, A. (2017). Collective Choice and Social Welfare. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Stevenson, B., and Wolfers, J. (2013). “Subjective well-being and income: Is there any evidence of satiation?,” American Economic Review, 103(3), 598–604.10.1257/aer.103.3.598CrossRef Google Scholar

Strasnick, S. L. (1975). “Preference priority and the maximization of social welfare.” PhD thesis, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Strotz, R. H. (1955). “Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization,” The Review of Economic Studies, 23(3), 165–180.10.2307/2295722CrossRef Google Scholar

Vasquez, J., and Weretka, M. (2019). “Mutual empathy in games.” Working Paper, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar

Vickrey, W. (1945). “Measuring marginal utility by reactions to risk,” Econometrica, 13(4), 319–333.10.2307/1906925CrossRef Google Scholar

Weymark, J. (1991). “A reconsideration of the Harsanyi–Sen debate on utilitarianism.” In Elster, J. and Roemer, J. (eds.), Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 255–320.10.1017/CBO9781139172387.009CrossRef Google Scholar

Weymark, J. (2005). “Measurement theory and the foundations of utilitarianism,” Social Choice and Welfare, 25, 527–555.10.1007/s00355-005-0017-7CrossRef Google Scholar

Yeatman, R. J., and Sellar, W. C. (1930). 1066 and All That: A Memorable History of England. London: Methuen Publishing.Google Scholar

Young, P. (1976). “Optimal voting rules,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(1), 51–64.10.1257/jep.9.1.51CrossRef Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Inaccessible, or known limited accessibility

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The PDF of this book is known to have missing or limited accessibility features. We may be reviewing its accessibility for future improvement, but final compliance is not yet assured and may be subject to legal exceptions. If you have any questions, please contact accessibility@cambridge.org.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.

Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.