Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-gnk9b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-27T10:54:17.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2025

Geraldo Vidigal
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Adjudicating over Anarchy
Judicial Remedies, Compliance, and Enforcement in International Law
, pp. 532 - 596
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2026

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Abass, Ademola, Regional Organisations and the Development of Collective Security (London: Hart Publishing, 2004)Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, Communitarian International Relations: The Epistemic Foundations of International Relations (New York: Routledge, 2005)Google Scholar
Alder, Murray Colin, The Inherent Right of Self-Defence in International Law (Dordrecht: Springer, 2012)Google Scholar
Alland, Dennis, Justice privée et ordre juridique international (Paris: Pedone, 1994)Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., and Helfer, Laurence R., Transplanting International Courts – The Law and Politics of the Andean Tribunal of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., Helfer, Laurence R., and Madsen, Mikael Rask, International Court Authority (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018)Google Scholar
Alvarez, Jose E., International Organizations as Law-Makers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan F., Jurisdiction of International Tribunals (The Hague: Kluwer, 2003)Google Scholar
Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan F., Local Remedies in International Law, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan Felix, Jurisdiction of Specific International Tribunals (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan Felix, International Arbitral Jurisdiction (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009)Google Scholar
Amr, Mohamed Sameh M., The Role of the International Court of Justice as the Principal Judicial Organ of the United Nations (The Hague: Kluwer, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzilotti, Dionisio, Teoria generale della responsabilità dello stato nel diritto internazionale (Firenze: F. Iumachi, 1902)Google Scholar
Armstrong, David, Theo, Farrell, and Hélène, Lambert, International Law and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aron, Raymond, Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations (New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 2003)Google Scholar
Austin, John, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (London: John Murray, 1832)Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert, The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic, 1984)Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert, The Evolution of Cooperation, Revised Edition (New York: Basic, 2006)Google Scholar
Babu, Rajesh, Remedies under the WTO Legal System (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bankas, Ernest K., The State Immunity Controversy in International Law: Private Suits against Sovereign States in Domestic Courts, 2nd edn (Berlin: Springer, 2022)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barents, René, Remedies and Procedures before the EU Courts, 2nd edn (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2016)Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (London: T. Payne and Son, 1780)Google Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagadish N., and Hugh, T. Patrick (eds.), Aggressive Unilateralism: America’s 301 Trade Policy and the World Trading System (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Henry Campbell, Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th edn (Saint Paul: West, 1991)Google Scholar
Blaeu, Johannes, and others, Corpus Iuris Civilis (Amsterdam: Blaeu and Elsevier, 1659)Google Scholar
Borchard, Edwin M., Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad (New York: Banks Law, 1928)Google Scholar
Bower, Adam, Norms without the Great Powers: International Law and Changing Social Standards in World Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brierly, James, The Law of Nations (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1928)Google Scholar
Broude, Tomer, and Yuval, Shany, Multi-Sourced Equivalent Norms in International Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011)Google Scholar
Brown, Chester, A Common Law of International Adjudication (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J., Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995)Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002)Google Scholar
Burgorgue-Larsen, Laurence, The 3 Regional Human Rights Courts in Context – Justice That Cannot Be Taken for Granted (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgorgue-Larsen, Laurence, and Amaya, Ubeda de Torres, The Inter-American Court of Human Rights – Case Law and Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgstaller, Markus, Theories of Compliance with International Law (Leiden: Brill, 1995)Google Scholar
Burke, John (ed.), Jowitt’s Dictionary of English Law, 2nd edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1977)Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Charles, Jones, and Richard, Little, The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çali, Başak, The Authority of International Law: Obedience, Respect, and Rebuttal (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Eric H., Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations (London: MacMillan, 1939/1946)Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Antonia Handler, Chayes, The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Cheng, Bin, General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (London: Stevens, 1953)Google Scholar
Collier, John G., and Vaughan, Lowe, The Settlement of Disputes in International Law: Institutions and Procedures (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Combacau, Jean, Le pouvoir de sanction de l’ONU: étude théorique de la coercition non militaire (Paris: A. Pedone, 1974)Google Scholar
Corten, Olivier, The Law against War: The Prohibition on the Use of Force in Contemporary International Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Paul, and Gráinne, De Búrca, EU Law, Texts, Cases and Materials, 6th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, James, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, 8th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, James, State Responsibility: The General Part (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, James, The Law of State Responsibility: The General Part (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dam, Kenneth W., The GATT: Law and International Economic Organization (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970)Google Scholar
Davis, Christina L., Why Adjudicate? Enforcing Trade Rules in the WTO (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Dawidowicz, Martin, Third-Party Countermeasures in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domingo, Rafael, The New Global Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörfler, Thomas, Security Council Sanctions Governance: The Power and Limits of Rules (Oxford: Routledge, 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Zachary, The International Law of Investment Claims (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W., The Sanctions Paradox: Economic Statecraft and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W., All Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Eagleton-Pierce, Matthew, Symbolic Power in the World Trade Organization (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Ebers, Martin, Rechte, Rechtsbehelfe und Sanktionen im Unionsprivatrecht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellickson, Robert, Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrall, Jeremy Matam, United Nations Sanctions and the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Roger, Improving Compliance with International Law (Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia, 1981)Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Gerald, The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Fonteles, Samuel Sales, Remédios Constitucionais, 5th edn (Salvador: Juspodivm, 2023)Google Scholar
Fox, Hazel, and Philippa, Webb, The Law of State Immunity, 3rd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015)Google Scholar
Francioni, Francesco, and James, Gordley (eds.), Enforcing International Cultural Heritage Law, Cultural Heritage Law and Policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., The Power of Legitimacy among Nations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon L., The Morality of Law, Revised Edition (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969)Google Scholar
Furedi, Frank, Authority: A Sociological History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaillard, Emmanuel, and Savage, John, Fouchard, Gaillars, Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration (The Hague: Kluwer, 1999)Google Scholar
Gaillard, Emmanuel, and Yas, Banifatemi (eds.), Annulment of ICSID Awards (New York: Juris, 2004)Google Scholar
García-Amador, F.V., The Changing Law of International Claims, vol. 575 (Dobbs Ferry: Oceana, 1984)Google Scholar
Garner, Brian A. (ed.), Black’s Law Dictionary, 9th edn (Saint Paul: West, 2004)Google Scholar
Gateva, Eli, European Union Enlargement Conditionality (New York: Palgrave, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L., and Posner, Eric A., The Limits of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Christine, International Law and the Use of Force, 4th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Christine, Judicial Remedies in International Law (Oxford: Clarendon, 1987)Google Scholar
Green, James A., Collective Self-Defence in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2024)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grewe, Wilhelm G., The Epochs of International Law (Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Nienke, Harlan, Grant Cohen, Andreas, Føllesdal, and Geir, Ulfstein (eds.), Legitimacy and International Courts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grotius, Hugo, The Law of War and Peace (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005)Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo, The Rights of War and Peace (transl. A.C. Campbell) (Clark: Lawbook Exchange, 1901)Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo, The Rights of War and Peace: Including the Law of Nature and of Nations (transl. A.C. Campbell) (New York: Nabu, 2011)Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew, How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambro, Edvard, L’Exécution des Sentences Internationales (Liège: Vaillant-Carmanne, 1936)Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961)Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis, How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy, 2nd edn (New York: Columbia University Press, 1979 [1968])Google Scholar
Hillebrecht, , Courtney, Domestic Politics and International Human Rights Tribunals: The Problem of Compliance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovell, Devika, The Power of Process: The Value of Due Process in Security Council Sanctions Decision-Making (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, Robert, Hélène, Ruiz Fabri, Geir, Ulfstein, and Michelle, Q. Zang (eds.), The Legitimacy of International Trade Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudec, Robert E., Adjudication of International Trade Disputes, Thames Essay No. 16 (London: Trade Policy Research Center, 1978)Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E., Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System (Salem, NH: Butterworth, 1991)Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew, On Global Order: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iovane, Massimo, La Riparazione nella Teoria e nella Prassi dell’Illecito Internazionale (Milan: Giuffrè, 1990)Google Scholar
Jha, Green B.P., International Nuclear Law and Nuclear Liability (The Hague: Kluwer, 1998)Google Scholar
Jhering, Rudolf von, L’esprit du droit romain dans ses diverses phases de son développement, 3rd edn (Paris: A. Marescq, 1878)Google Scholar
Johns, Leslie, Strengthening International Courts: The Hidden Costs of Legalization (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Paul, Slovic, and Amos, Tversky (eds.), Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982/2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaikobad, Kaiyan Homi, Interpretation and Revision of International Boundary Decisions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Principles of International Law (New York: Rinehart, 1952)Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, The Law of the United Nations (London: Stevens & Sons, 1951)Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, The Law of the United Nations: A Critical Analysis of Its Fundamental Problems (Clark: Lawbook Exchange, 2011)Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, The Pure Theory of Law (transl. Max Knight) (Clark: Lawbook Exchange, 2005)Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan, A Critique of Adjudication (fin de siècle) (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Klein, Natalie, Dispute Settlement in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D., International Regimes (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1983)Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich V., Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Development of International Law by the International Court (London: Steven, 1958)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011 [1933])CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, Jonathan, and Elizabeth, A. Martin (eds.), Oxford Dictionary of Law, 7th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laycock, Douglas, Modern American Remedies, 3rd edn (New York: Aspen, 2002)Google Scholar
Laycock, Douglas, Modern American Remedies, 4th edn (New York: Aspen, 2010)Google Scholar
Leben, Charles, Les sanctions privatives de droits ou de qualité dans les organisations internationales spécialisées: recherches sur les sanctions internationales et l’évolution du droit des gens (Bruxelles: Bruylant, 1979)Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned, A Cultural Theory of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Lucy, William, Understanding and Explaining Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert, A Study on Authority (transl. Joris de Bres) (London: Verso, 2008)Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa L., Coercive Cooperation: Explaining Multilateral Economic Sanctions (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrills, J.G., International Dispute Settlement, 5th edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miéville, China, Between Equal Rights: A Marxist Theory of International Law (Leiden: Brill, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milde, Michael, International Air Law and ICAO, 3rd edn (The Hague: Eleven, 2016)Google Scholar
Miles, Cameron A., Provisional Measures before International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, Kate, The Origins of International Investment Law: Empire, Environment and the Safeguarding of Capital (Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Helen V., Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Möhrlein, Rosa, The Multiplicity of Judicial Functions of International Courts and Tribunals. An Inquiry with a Focus on the International Court of Justice (Groningen: Chimaira, 2024)Google Scholar
Mommsen, Theodor, Römisches Staatsrecht, 3rd edn (Leipzig: S. Hirzel, 1888)Google Scholar
Montaldo, Stefano, Francesco, Costamagna, and Alberto, Miglio (eds.), EU Law Enforcement: The Evolution of Sanctioning Powers (London: Routlege, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, John Bassett, History and Digest of the International Arbitrations to Which the United States Has Been a Party (Washington, DC: US Government, 1989)Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J., Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 5th edn (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1978)Google Scholar
Morrisson, Wayne (ed.), Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England (London: Cavendish, 2013)Google Scholar
Nantwi, E.K., The Enforcement of International Judicial Decisions and Arbitral Awards in Public International Law (Leiden: Sijthoff, 1966)Google Scholar
Nordquist, Myron H. (ed.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 – A Commentary (Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1989)Google Scholar
North, Douglass C., Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990/2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connell, Mary Ellen, International Dispute Resolution: Cases and Materials (Durham, NC: Carolina Academic, 2012)Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas, World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations (New York: Routledge, 1989/2012)Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Lassa, International Law: A Treatise (New York: Longmans Green, 1905)Google Scholar
Özsu, Umut, Completing Humanity: The International Law of Decolonization, 1960–82 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2024)Google Scholar
Paddeu, Federica, Justification and Excuse in International Law: Concept and Theory of General Defences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paine, Joshua, The Functions of International Adjudication and International Environmental Litigation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2024)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palazón Garrido, María Luisa, Los Remedios Frente al Incumplimiento en el Derecho Comparado (Navarra: Aranzadi, 2014)Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, Optimal Protection of International Law: Navigating between European Absolutism and American Voluntarism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralston, Jackson H., International Arbitration from Athens to Locarno (Standford: Stanford University Press, 1929)Google Scholar
Reece Thomas, Katherine, The Commercial Activity Exception to State Immunity: An Introduction (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2024)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiners, Nina, Transnational Lawmaking Coalitions for Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisman, William M., Systems of Control in International Adjudication and Arbitration: Breakdown and Repair (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Reisman, William Michael, Nullity and Revision – The Review and Enforcement of International Judgments and Awards (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971)Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, Remedies for Human Rights Violations: A Two-Track Approach to Supra-national and National Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romani, Francesco, Belligerent Reprisals from Enforcement to Reciprocity: A New Theory of Retaliation in Conflict (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2024)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenne, Shabtai, Breach of Treaty (Cambridge: Grotius, 1985)Google Scholar
Rosenne, Shabtai, Interpretation, Revision and Other Recourse from International Judgments and Awards (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenne, Shabtai, Provisional Measures in International Law: The International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Rosenne, Shabtai, The Law and Practice of the International Court, 1920–2005, 4th edn (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz Fabri, Hélène, and Michel, Erpelding, The Mixed Arbitral Tribunals, 1919–1939 – An Experiment in the International Adjudication of Private Rights (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2023)Google Scholar
Ruys, Tom, ‘Armed Attack’ and Article 51 of the UN Charter: Evolutions in Customary Law and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Sabahi, Burzu, Compensation and Restitution in Investor-State Arbitration: Principles and Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Sarooshi, Dan, International Organizations and Their Exercise of Sovereign Powers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., The Multilateralization of International Investment Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph, The ICSID Convention: A Commentary, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, Constanze, Compliance with Decisions of the International Court of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James B. (ed.), Reports to the Hague Conferences of 1899 and 1907 (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1917)Google Scholar
Scott, James B. (ed.), The Proceedings of the Hague Peace Conferences: The Conference of 1907: Translation of the Official Texts, vol. II (Hague: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1921)Google Scholar
Scott, James B. (dir.), The Proceedings of the Hague Peace Conferences – The Conference of 1899 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1920)Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin, Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Malcolm N., International Law, 6th edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelton, Dinah, Remedies in International Human Rights Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, Bhek P., Unilateral Denunciation of Treaty Because of Prior Violations of Obligations by Other Party (The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, William (ed.), Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities (Boston: Little Brown, 1870)Google Scholar
Squatrito, Theresa, Oran, R. Young, Andreas, Føllesdal, and Geir, Ulfstein (eds.), The Performance of International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St John, Taylor, The Rise of Investor-State Arbitration: Politics, Law, and Unintended Consequences (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoica, Victor, Remedies before the International Court of Justice: A Systemic Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec, The Judicial Construction of Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tams, Christian J., Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thirlway, Hugh, The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tistounet, Eric, The UN Human Rights Council: A Practical Anatomy (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trachtman, Joel P., The Economic Structure of International Law (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treves, Tullio, et al. (eds.), Non-Compliance Procedures and Mechanisms and the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements (The Hague: TMC Asser, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., Why People Obey the Law (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzanakopoulos, Antonios, Disobeying the Security Council: Countermeasures against Wrongful Sanctions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vattel, Emmerich de, Le Droit des Gens ou Principes de la loi naturelle, appliqués à la conduite et aux affaires des Nations et des Souverains (Neuchâtel: A. Londres, 1758)Google Scholar
Venzke, Ingo, How Interpretation Makes International Law: On Semantic Change and Normative Twists (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villiger, Mark E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villiger, Mark Eugen, Customary International Law and Treaties: A Manual on the Theory and Practice of the Interrelation of Sources, 2nd edn (Hague: Kluwer, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Bogdandy, Armin, and Ingo, Venzke, In Whose Name? A Public Law Theory of International Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Vrdoljak, Ana Filipa, International Law, Museums and the Return of Cultural Objects (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Waibel, Michael, Sovereign Defaults before International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherall, Thomas, Jus Cogens: International Law and Social Contract (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H.H., Antonio, Cassese, and Marina, Spinedi, International Crimes of State: A Critical Analysis of the ILC’s Draft Article 19 on State Responsibility (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteman, Marjorie M. (ed.), Digest of International Law (Washington: US Government Printing Office, 1970)Google Scholar
Wilcox, Clair, A Charter for World Trade (New York: MacMillan, 1949)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WTO, GATT Disputes: 1948–1995 Volume 1: Overview and One-Page Case Summaries (Geneva: WTO, 2018)Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Carmen, Rogue States as Norm Entrepreneurs: Black Sheep or Sheep in Wolves’ Clothing? (Cham: Springer, 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt, Tanya, Is CITES Protecting Wildlife? Assessing Implementation and Compliance (Oxon: Routledge, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiouri, Maria, The Breach of a Treaty: State Responses in International Law (Leiden: Brill | Nijhoff, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Oran R., Compliance and Public Authority: A Theory with International Application (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979)Google Scholar
Young, Oran R., Governance in World Affairs (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Oran R., International Governance: Protecting the Environment in a Stateless Society (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Zoller, Elisabeth, Peacetime Unilateral Remedies: An Analysis of Countermeasures (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Publishers, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W., Keohane, Robert O., Andrew, Moravcsik, Anne-Marie, Slaughter, and Duncan, Snidal, ‘The Concept of Legalization’ (2000) 54(3) International Organization 401433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdulqawi, Yusuf, ‘The Notion of “Armed Attack” in the Nicaragua Judgment and Its Influence on Subsequent Case Law’ (2012) 25(2) Leiden Journal of International Law 461470Google Scholar
Abizadeh, Arash, ‘The Grammar of Social Power: Power-To, Power-With, Power-Despite and Power-Over’ (2023) 71(1) Political Studies 319CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adler, Emanuel, ‘Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics’ (1997) 3(3) European Journal of International Relations 319363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ago, Roberto, ‘Binding Advisory Opinions of the International Court of Justice’ (1991) 85(3) American Journal of International Law 439451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ago, Roberto, ‘Le délit International’ (1939) 68 Hague Recueil 415554Google Scholar
Alexander, Klint W., and Soukup, Bryan J., ‘Obama’s First Trade War: The US-Mexico Cross-Border Trucking Dispute and the Implications of Strategic Cross-Sector Retaliation on U.S. Compliance under NAFTA’ (2010) 28(2) Berkeley Journal of International Law 313364Google Scholar
Al-Qahtani, Mutlaq, ‘The Role of the International Court of Justice in the Enforcement of Its Judicial Decisions’ (2002) 15(4) Leiden Journal of International Law 781802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alschner, Wolfgang, ‘Amicable Settlements of WTO Disputes: Bilateral Solutions in a Multilateral System’ (2014) 13(1) World Trade Review 65102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, Philip, ‘Resisting the Merger and Acquisition of Human Rights by Trade Law: A Reply to Petersmann’ (2002) 13(4) European Journal of International Law 815844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J., ‘Agents or Trustees? International Courts in Their Political Context’ (2008) 14(1) European Journal of International Relations 3363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J., ‘The European Court’s Political Power’ (1996) 19(3) West European Politics 458487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J., Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Helfer, Laurence R., ‘Theorizing the Judicialization of International Relations’ (2019) 63(3) International Studies Quarterly 449463, 450–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J., Gathii, James T., and Helfer, Lawrence R., ‘Backlash against International Courts in West, East and Southern Africa: Causes and Consequences’ (2016) 27(2) European Journal of International Law 293328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J., Helfer, Laurence R., and Madsen, Mikael RaskHow Context Shapes the Authority of International Courts’ (2016) 79(1) Law and Contemporary Problems 136Google Scholar
Ambos, Kai, ‘International Criminal Procedure: “Adversarial”, “Inquisitorial” or Mixed?3 International Criminal Law Review (2003) 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Scott D., and Blanchet, Justine, ‘The United States’ Experience and Practice in Suspending WTO Obligations’, in Bown, Chad P. and Pauwelyn, Joost (eds.), The Law, Economics and Politics of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 172202Google Scholar
Anderson, Kenneth, ‘The Ottawa Convention Banning Landmines, the Role of International Non-Governmental Organizations and the Idea of International Civil Society’ (2000) 11(1) European Journal of International Law 91120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antkowiak, Thomas M., ‘Remedial Approaches to Human Rights Violations: The Inter-American Court of Human Rights and Beyond’ (2008) 46(2) Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 351419Google Scholar
Arato, Julian, ‘Subsequent Practice and Evolutive Interpretation: Techniques of Treaty Interpretation over Time and Their Diverse Consequences’ (2010) 9 The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 443494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, ‘What Is Authority?’, in Hannah Arendt, between Past and Future (New York: Penguin, 1968), 91141Google Scholar
Ascensio, Hervé, ‘La notion de juridiction internationale en question’, in Société Française de Droit International, La Juridictionnalisation du Droit International (Paris: Pedone, 2003), 163202Google Scholar
Azaria, Danae, ‘The Legal Significance of Expert Treaty Bodies Pronouncements for the Purpose of the Interpretation of Treaties’ (2020) 22(1) International Community Law Review 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azaria, Danae, ‘Trade Countermeasures for Breaches of International Law outside the WTO’ (2022) 71(2) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 389421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badanova, Ielyzaveta, ‘Jurisdictional Immunities v Grave Crimes: Reflections on New Developments from Ukraine’ (8 September 2022) EJIL: Talk!, available at www.ejiltalk.org/jurisdictional-immunities-v-grave-crimes-reflections-on-new-developments-from-ukraineGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, Kyle, ‘Remedies in the WTO: An Economic Perspective’, in Janow, Merit E., Donaldson, Victoria J., and Yanovitch, Alan (eds.), The WTO Governance, Dispute Settlement and Developing Countries (New York: Juris, 2008), 733770Google Scholar
Baluarte, David C., ‘Strategizing for Compliance: The Evolution of the Compliance Phase of Inter-American Court Litigation and the Strategic Imperative for Victims’ Representatives’ (2012) 27(2) American University International Law Review 263321Google Scholar
Barber, Rebecca, ‘An Exploration of the General Assembly’s Troubled Relationship with Unilateral Sanctions’ (2021) 70(2) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 343375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barboza, Julio, ‘The Beagle Channel Dispute: Reflections of the Agent of Argentina’ (2014) 13(1) Chinese Journal of International Law 147170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, John, ‘The Different Forms of Reparation: Compensation’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain, and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 599611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Lorand, ‘Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings’ (2001) 35(3) Journal of World Trade 499519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Lorand, ‘Jurisdiction and Applicable Law Clauses in International Law: Where Does a Tribunal Find the Principal Norms Applicable to the Case before It?’, in Broude, Tomer and Shany, Yuval (eds.), Multi-Sourced Equivalent Norms in International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2011), 115140Google Scholar
Batselé, Filip, ‘Foreign Investors of the World, Unite! The International Association for the Promotion and Protection of Private Foreign Investments (APPI) 1958–1968’ (2023) 34(2) European Journal of International Law 415447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Matthew A., ‘The Constituent Foundations of the Rally-Round-the-Flag Phenomenon’ (2002) 46(2) International Studies Quarterly 263298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, R.R., ‘International Law in “Her Infinite Variety”‘ (1980) 23 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bederman, David J., ‘Constructivism, Positivism, and Empiricism in International Law’ (2001) 89(2) Georgetown Law Journal 469540Google Scholar
Bederman, David, ‘Counterintuiting Countermeasures’ (2002) 96(4) American Journal of International Law 817832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer, Yishai, ‘Regulating Armed Reprisals: Revisiting the Scope of Lawful Self-Defense’ (2020) 59(1) Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 117Google Scholar
Bello, Judith H., ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Less is More’ (1996) 90(3) American Journal of International Law 416418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermann, George A., ‘Understanding ICSID Article 54’ (2020) 35(2) ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 311342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Lisa, ‘Opting Out of the Legal System: Extralegal Contractual Relations in the Diamond Industry’ (1992) 21(1) The Journal of Legal Studies 115157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besson, Samantha, ‘European Legal Pluralism After Kadi’ (2009) 5(2) European Constitutional Law Review 237264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Andrea, ‘Human Rights and the Magic of Jus Cogens’ (2008) 19(3) European Journal of International Law 491508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilder, Richard B., ‘International Third Party Dispute Settlement’ (1989) 17(3) Denver Journal of International Law & Policy 471Google Scholar
Bjorge, Eirik, ‘Opposability and Non-Opposability in International Law’ (2021) British Yearbook of International Law OnlineCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bondar, Kateryna, ‘Annulment of ICSID and Non-ICSID Investment Awards: Differences in the Extent of Review’ (2015) 32(6) Journal of International Arbitration 621640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borchard, Edwin M., ‘Editorial Comment – Declaratory Judgments in International Law’ (1935) 29(3) American Journal of International Law 488492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borger, Julian, ‘South Africa’s President and ANC Sow Confusion over Leaving ICC’ (25 April 2023) The Guardian, available at www.theguardian.com/world/2023/apr/25/south-africas-president-and-party-sow-confusion-over-leaving-iccGoogle Scholar
Born, Gary, ‘A New Generation of International Adjudication’ (2012) 61(4) Duke Law Journal 775879Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, ‘Social Space and Symbolic Power’ (1989) 7(1) Sociological Theory 1425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdon, Pierre, and Pauline, Marcou, Aux Origines de la Notion de Remède pour Traiter les Vices de la Formation des Contrats Civils et Administratifs (2022) 4 Revue des Contrats 92Google Scholar
Boyes, Christina, Eldredge, Cody D., Megan, Shannon, and Kelebogile, Zvobgo, ‘Social Pressure in the International Human Rights Regime: Why States Withdraw Treaty Reservations’ (2023) 54(1) British Journal of Political Science 241258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuss, Fritz, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement: An Economic Analysis of Four EU–US Mini Trade Wars – A Survey’ (2004) 4(3) Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 275317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewster, Rachel, ‘The Remedy Gap: Institutional Design, Retaliation, and Trade Law Enforcement’ (2011) 80(1) George Washington Law Review 102158Google Scholar
Briggs, Herbert, ‘Unilateral Denunciation of Treaties: The Vienna Convention and the International Court of Justice’ (1974) 68(1) American Journal of International Law 5158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronckers, Marco, and Freya, Baetens, ‘Reconsidering Financial Remedies in WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2013) 16(2) Journal of International Economic Law 281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronckers, Marco, and Giovanni, Gruni, ‘Retooling the Sustainability Standards in EU Free Trade Agreements’ (2021) 24(1) Journal of International Economic Law 2554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broude, Tomer, ‘Behavioral International Law’ (2015) 163(4) University of Pennsylvania Law Review 10991157Google Scholar
Brown, Chester, ‘The Inherent Powers of International Courts and Tribunals’ (2005) 76(1) British Yearbook of International Law 195244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlie, Ian, ‘Remedies in the International Court of Justice’, in Lowe, Vaughan and Fitzmaurice, Malgosia (eds.), Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 566580Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, ‘Enforcement Mechanisms in International Law and International Environmental Law’, in Beyerlin, Ulrich, Stoll, Peter-Tobias, and Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds.), Ensuring Compliance with Multilateral Environmental Agreements (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2006), 123Google Scholar
Brunée, Jutta, ‘Compliance Control’, in Ulfstein, Geir, Marauhn, Thilo, and Zimmermann, Andreas (eds.), Making Treaties Work: Human Rights, Environment and Arms Control (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 373390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J., ‘International Law and the Practice of Legality: Stability and Change’ (2018) 49(4) Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 429456Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, ‘Promoting Compliance with Multilateral Environmental Agreements’, in Brunnée, Jutta, Doelle, Meinhard, and Rajamani, Lavanya (eds.), Promoting Compliance in an Evolving Climate Regime (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 3866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buergenthal, Thomas, ‘Proliferation of International Courts and Tribunals: Is It Good or Bad?’ (2001) 14(2) Leiden Journal of International Law 267275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burelli, Camilla, ‘The Deterrent Effect of Financial Sanctions Pursuant to Article 260(2) TFEU in the Context of Violations of Environmental Obligations’ (2023) 3(3) Italian Review of International and Comparative Law 367–395Google Scholar
Burgorgue-Larsen, Laurence, ‘The Powers of the Court to Monitor Compliance with Its Judgments’, in Burgorgue-Larsen, Laurence and Ubeda de Torres, Amaya (eds.), The Inter-American Court of Human Rights – Case Law and Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 171210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busse, Dietrich, ‘Semantic Strategies as a Means of Politics: Linguistic Approaches to the Analysis of “Semantic Struggles”‘, in Ahonen, Pertti (ed.), Tracing the Semiotic Boundaries of Politics (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1993), 121147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, Michael, ‘Terrorism, the Use of Force and International Law After 11 September’ (2002) 51(2) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 401414Google Scholar
Cançado Trindade, Antonio Augusto, ‘Exhaustion of Local Remedies in International Law and the Role of National Courts’ (1986) 17(3/4) Archiv des Völkerrechts 333370Google Scholar
Canizzarro, Enzo, and Palchetti, Paolo, ‘Ultra Vires Acts of International Organizations’, in Klabbers, Jan and Wallendahl, Asa (eds.), Research Handbook on the Law of International Organizations (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2011), 365388Google Scholar
Caroli, Paolo, ‘Compensation without Recognition: The German-Italian Dispute over War Crime Compensation and Transnational Justice’ (6 June 2022) Verfassungsblog, available at https://verfassungsblog.de/compensation-without-recognitionGoogle Scholar
Caron, David D., ‘Towards a Political Theory of International Courts and Tribunals’ (2006) 24(2) Berkeley Journal of International Law 401422Google Scholar
Caserta, Salvatore, and Madsen, Mikael Rask, ‘Between Community Law and Common Law: The Rise of the Caribbean Court of Justice at the Intersection of Regional Integration and Post-Colonial Legacies’ (2016) 79(1) Law and Contemporary Problems 89115Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, ‘Remarks on Scelle’s Theory of ‘Role Splitting’ (Dédoublement Fonctionnel) in International Law’ (1990) 1(1) European Journal of International Law 210231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, Jonathan, ‘Third Party Dispute Settlement and International Law’ (1998) 36(1) Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 65126Google Scholar
Charney, Jonathan, ‘Third State Remedies in International Law’ (1989) 10(1) Michigan Journal of International Law 57101Google Scholar
Charnovitz, Steve, ‘Should the Teeth Be Pulled? An Analysis of WTO Sanctions’, in Kennedy, Daniel L. M. and Southwick, James D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade – Essays in Honour of Robert E. Hudec (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 602635Google Scholar
Charnovitz, Steve, ‘The WTO’s Problematic “Last Resort” against Noncompliance’ (2002) 57(3) Aussenwirtschaft 409434Google Scholar
Chinese Society of International Law, ‘The South China Sea Arbitration Awards: A Critical Study’ (2018) 17(2) Chinese Journal of International Law 207268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Susan, ‘Judicial Enforcement of Arbitration Awards under the ICSID and New York Conventions’ (1995) 28 NYU Journal of International Law & Politics 175216Google Scholar
Christiano, Tom, ‘Authority’, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2020)Google Scholar
Claes, Monica, ‘The Primacy of EU Law in European and National Law’, in Arnull, Anthony and Chalmers, Damian (eds.), Oxford Handbook of European Union Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 178202Google Scholar
Closa, Carlos, and Gisela, Hernández, ‘Defining and Operationalising Defiant Non-Compliance in the EU: The Rule of Law Case’ (2025) 63(3) Journal of Common Market Studies 964986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Harlan Grant, ‘Can International Law Work? A Constructivist Expansion’ (2009) 27(2) Berkeley Journal of International Law 636678Google Scholar
Cohen, Harlan Grant, ‘International Law’s Erie Moment’ (2013) 34(3) Michigan Journal of International Law 249302Google Scholar
Cohen, Harlan Grant, ‘Theorizing Precedent in International Law’, in Bianchi, Andrea, Peat, Daniel, and Windsor, Matthew (eds.), Interpretation in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 268289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combacau, Jean, ‘Le chapitre VII de la Charte des Nations Unies: résurrection ou métamorphose ?’, in Rafâa, Ben Achour and Slim, Laghani (eds.), Les nouveaux aspects du droit international – Colloque des 14, 15 et 16 avril 1994 (Pedone, 1994), 139162Google Scholar
Contesse, Jorge, ‘Contestation and Deference in the Inter-American Human Rights System’ (2016) 79(1) Law & Contemporary Problems 123170Google Scholar
Costa, Oriol, ‘The Unexpected EU Leadership on Landmines: The Influence of the Ottawa Convention on the EU’ (2009) 18(3) European Security 245261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cover, Robert M., ‘The Bonds of Constitutional Interpretation: Of the Word, the Deed, and the Role’ (1986) 20(4) Georgia Law Review 815833Google Scholar
Cover, Robert M., ‘The Supreme Court, 1982 Term-Foreword: Nomos and Narrative’ (1983) 97(1) Harvard Law Review 168Google Scholar
Cover, Robert M., ‘Violence and the Word’ (1986) 95(8) Yale Law Journal 16011629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, James, ‘The Relationship between Sanctions and Countermeasures’, in Gowlland-Debbas (ed.), United Nations Sanctions and International Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law, 2007), 5768Google Scholar
Crawford, James, and Simon, Olleson, ‘The Exception of Non-Performance: Links between the Law of Treaties and the Law of State Responsibility’ (2000) 21(1) Australian Yearbook of International Law 5585Google Scholar
Crawford, James, ‘Multilateral Rights and Obligations in International Law’ (2006) 319 RdC 325482Google Scholar
d’Argent, Pierre, ‘Reparations and Compliance’, in Bannelier, Karine, Christakis, Theodore, and Heathcote, Sarah (eds.), The ICJ and the Evolution of International Law – The Enduring Impact of the Corfu Channel Case (London: Routledge, 2012), 335356Google Scholar
Dai, Xinyuan, ‘Why Comply? The Domestic Constituency Mechanism’ (2005) 59(2) International Organization 363398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, William J., ‘Compliance Problems in WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2009) 42(1) Cornell International Law Journal 120162Google Scholar
de Chazournes, Laurence Boisson, and Antonella Angelini, ‘After “The Court Rose”: The Rise of Diplomatic Means to Implement the Pronouncements of the International Court of Justice’ (2012) 11(1) Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 134Google Scholar
Dempsey, Michelle Madden, ‘Authority, Obedience, and Justification’ (2021) 90(2) University of Cincinnati Law Review 408453Google Scholar
De Silva, Nicole, and Plagis, Misha Ariana, ‘NGOs, International Courts, and State Backlash against Human Rights Accountability: Evidence from NGO Mobilization against Tanzania at the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights’ (2023) 57(1) Law & Society Review 3660Google Scholar
Diakité, Maïmouna, and Baize, Zoé, ‘Sanctions by International Organizations and Judicial Review: The Case of Mali vs the Conference of Heads of States and Government of the WAEMU’ (2024) 51(2) Legal Issues of Economic Integration 171194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, William, ‘Res Judicata’, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Domingo, Rafael, ‘Das Binom auctoritas-potestas im römischen und modernen Recht’ (1998) 4 Orbis Iuris Romani 7Google Scholar
Domínguez Redondo, Elvira, ‘The Universal Periodic Review of the UN Human Rights Council: An Assessment of the First Session’ (2008) 7(3) Chinese Journal of International Law 721734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, George W., ‘Enforcement and the Evolution of Cooperation’ (1997) 19(2) Michigan Journal of International Law 319344Google Scholar
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Barsoom, Peter N., ‘Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation?’ (1996) 50(3) International Organization 379406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, George W., and Jones, Michael A., ‘Reputation, Compliance, and International Law’ (2002) 31(S1) The Journal of Legal Studies S95S114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W., ‘Bargaining, Enforcement, and Multilateral Sanctions: When Is Cooperation Counterproductive?’ (2000) 54(1) International Organization 73102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W., ‘The Hidden Hand of Economic Coercion’ (2003) 57(3) International Organization 643659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drogula, Fred K., ‘Imperium, Potestas, and the Pomerium in the Roman Republic’ (2007) 56(4) Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 419452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, ‘The Model of Rules I’ (1967) 35(1) University of Chicago Law Review 1446Google Scholar
Ehring, Lothar, ‘The European Community’s Experience and Practice in Suspending WTO Obligations’, in Bown, Chad P. and Pauwelyn, Joost (eds.), The Law, Economics and Politics of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 244280Google Scholar
Eichberger, Fabian Simon, ‘Give a Court an Inch and It Will Take a Yard? The Exercise of Jurisdiction over Incidental Issues’ (2021) 81(1) ZaöRV 235–264Google Scholar
Fassbender, Bardo, ‘Targeted Sanctions Imposed by the UN Security Council and Due Process Rights’ (2006) 3(2) International Organizations Law Review 437448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fikfak, Veronika, ‘Compliance and Compensation: Money as a Currency of Human Rights’, in Murray, Rachel and Long, Debra (eds.), Research Handbook on Implementation of Human Rights in Practice (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2022), 4567Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn, ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’ (1998) 52(4) International Organization 887917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Gerald, ‘The Law and Procedure of International Court of Justice, 1951–4: Questions of Jurisdiction, Competence and Procedure’ (1958) 34(1) British Yearbook of International Law 169Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Malgosia A., and Redgwell, Catherine, ‘Environmental Non-Compliance Procedures and International Law’ (2000) 31 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 3565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, MalgosiaAngst of the Exceptio Inadimplenti Non Est Adimplendum in International Law’, in Bartels, Lorand and Paddeu, Federica (eds.), Exceptions in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020), 285304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forlati, Serena, ‘Reactions to Non-Performance of Treaties in International Law’ (2012) 25(4) Leiden Journal of International Law 759790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox-Decent, Evan, ‘Fiduciary Authority and the Service Conception’, in Gold, Andrew S. and Miller, Paul B. (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 363387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., ‘Icy Day at the ICJ’ (1985) 79(2) American Journal of International Law 379384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., ‘The Power of Legitimacy and the Legitimacy of Power’ (2006) 100(1) American Journal of International Law 88106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon L., ‘Human Interaction and the Law’ (1969) 14 American Journal of Jurisprudence 136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon L., ‘Law as an Instrument of Social Control and Law as a Facilitation of Human Interaction’ (1975) 1(1) BYU Law Review 8996Google Scholar
Gaeta, Paola, and Labuda, Patryk I., ‘Trying Sitting Heads of State: The African Union versus the ICC in the Al Bashir and Kenyatta Cases’, in Chernor Jalloh, Charles and Bantekas, Ilias (eds.), The International Criminal Court and Africa (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 4879Google Scholar
Gallie, W.B., ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’ (1956) 56 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 167198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gantz, David A., ‘Dispute Settlement under the NAFTA and the WTO: Choice of Forum Opportunities and Risks for the NAFTA Parties’ (1999) 14(4) American University International Law Review 10251106Google Scholar
Garcia Blesa, Juan J., ‘Indeterminacy, Ideology and Legitimacy in International Investment Arbitration: Controlling International Private Networks of Legal Governance?’ (2022) 35(5) International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 1967–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gattini, Andrea, ‘Breach of the Obligation to Prevent and Reparation Thereof in the ICJ’s Genocide Judgment’ (2007) 18(4) European Journal of International Law 695713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazzini, Tarcisio, and Attila, Tanzi, ‘Handle with Care: Umbrella Clauses and MFN Treatment in Investment Arbitration’ (2013) 14(6) Journal of World Investment & Trade 9781008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgiev, George Stephanov, ‘The Award in Saluka Investments v Czech Republic’, in Michael Reisman, W. (ed.), The Reasons Requirement in International Investment Arbitration (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008), 149171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, and McAdams, Richard H., ‘Adjudicating in Anarchy: An Expressive Theory of International Law’ (2004) 45(4) William and Mary Law Review 12291339Google Scholar
Gneezy, Uri, and Rustichini, Aldo, ‘A Fine Is a Price’ (2000) 29(1) Journal of Legal Studies 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L., and Posner, Eric A., ‘A Theory of Customary International Law’ (1999) 66(4) University of Chicago Law Review 11131177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorobets, Kostiantyn, ‘Peaks and Valleys: Contemplating the Authority of International Law’, in Westerman, Pauline et al. (eds.), Conceptual (Re)Constructions of International Law (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2022), 171194Google Scholar
Gray, Christine, ‘Is There an International Law of Remedies?’ (1985) 56(1) British Yearbook of International Law 2579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Christine, ‘Remedies in International Dispute Settlement’, in Romano, Cesare P. R., Alter, Karen J., and Shany, Yuval (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 871889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Christine, ‘The Choice between Restitution and Compensation’ (1999) 10(2) European Journal of International Law 413423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Christine, ‘Types of Remedies in ICJ Cases: Lessons for the WTO’, in Weiss, Friedl and Wiers, Jochem (eds.), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures (London: Cameron May, 2000), 401415Google Scholar
Greenwood, Lucy, ‘Does Bifurcation Really Promote Efficiency?’ (2011) 28(2) Journal of International Arbitration 105111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilfoyle, Douglas, and Miles, Cameron, ‘Provisional Measures and the MV Arctic Sunrise’ (2014) 108(2) American Journal of International Law 271287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T., ‘A Compliance-Based Theory of International Law’ (2002) 90(6) California Law Review 18231887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T., ‘International Tribunals: A Rational Choice Analysis’ (2008) 157 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 171Google Scholar
Hakimi, Monica, ‘Making Sense of Customary International Law’ (2020) 118(8) Michigan Law Review 14871537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakimi, Monika, ‘The Work of International Law’ (2017) 58(1) Harvard International Law Journal 146Google Scholar
Hammond, Felicity, ‘A Balancing Act: Using WTO Dispute Settlement to Resolve Regional Trade Agreement Disputes’ (2012) 4(2) Trade, Law and Development 421–452Google Scholar
Harvard Research on ‘Responsibility of States for Damage Done in Their Territory to the Person or Property of Foreigners’ (1929) 20 American Journal of International Law Special Supplement 133–239Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona, and Shapiro, Scott J., ‘Outcasting: Enforcement in Domestic and International Law’ (2011) 121(2) Yale Law Journal 252349Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication’ (1997) 107(2) Yale Law Journal 273391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo’ (2005) 93(3) California Law Review 899956Google Scholar
Hellquist, Elin. “Regional Organizations and Sanctions against Members: Explaining the Different Trajectories of the African Union, the League of Arab States, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.” (2014) KFG Working Paper Series, No. 59. Berlin: Free University BerlinGoogle Scholar
Hess, Burkard, ‘The International Law Commission’s Draft Convention on the Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property’ (1993) 4(2) European Journal of International Law 269282Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, ‘Policy Considerations and the International Judicial Process’ (1968) 17(1) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 5884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, ‘The Place of International Law in the Settlement of Disputes by the Security Council’ (1970) 64(1) American Journal of International Law 118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horlick, Gary N., ‘Problems with the Compliance Structure of the WTO Dispute Resolution Process’, in Kennedy, Daniel L. M. and Southwick, James D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 636645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovell, Devika, ‘Unfinished Business of International Law: The Questionable Legality of Autonomous Sanctions’ (2019) 113 American Journal of International Law Unbound 140145Google Scholar
Howse, Robert, and Teitel, Ruti G., ‘Beyond Compliance: Rethinking Why International Law Really Matters’ (2010) 1(2) Global Policy 127136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudec, Robert E., ‘Broadening the Scope of Remedies in WTO Dispute Settlement’, in Weiss, Friedl and Wiers, Jochem (eds.), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures (London: Cameron May, 2000), 345376Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E., Kennedy, Daniel L.M., and Sgarbossa, Mark, ‘A Statistical Profile of GATT Dispute Settlement Cases: 1948–1989’, 2 Minnesota Journal of International Law (1993) 1Google Scholar
Hudson, Manley O., ‘The Central American Court of Justice’ (1932) 26(4) American Journal of International Law 759786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huerta-Goldman, Jorge A., ‘Is Retaliation Useful? Observations and Analysis of Mexico’s Experience’, in Bown, Chad P. and Pauwelyn, Joost (eds.), The Law, Economics and Politics of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 281309Google Scholar
Huneeus, Alexandra, ‘Constitutional Lawyers and the Inter-American Court’s Varied Authority’ (2016) 79(1) Law & Contemporary Problems 179207Google Scholar
Jackson, John H., ‘International Law Status of WTO Dispute Settlement Reports: Obligation to Comply or Option to “Buy Out”?’ (2004) 98(1) American Journal of International Law 109125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, John H., ‘The Birth of the GATT-MTN System: A Constitutional Appraisal’ (1980) 12(1) Law & Policy in International Business 2158Google Scholar
Jackson, John H., ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding – Misunderstandings on the Nature of Legal Obligation’ (1997) 91(1) American Journal of International Law 6064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacur, Francesca Romanin, ‘The Non-Compliance Procedure of the 1987 Montreal Protocol to the 1985 Vienna Convention on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer’, in Treves, Tullio et al. (eds.), Non-Compliance Procedures and Mechanisms and the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements (The Hague: TMC Asser, 2009), 1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janig, Phillip, ‘State Immunity from Non-Judicial Measures of Constraint’ (2025) 74(1) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 179204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janeba, Eckhard, ‘Regulatory Chill and the Effect of Investor State Dispute Settlements’ (2019) 27(4) Review of International Economics 11721198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrosson, Charles, ‘Réflexions sur l’imperium’, in Etudes offertes à Pierre Bellet (Paris: Litec, 1991), 245268Google Scholar
Jay, Zoe, and Matt, Killingsworth, ‘To Arrest or Not Arrest? South Africa, the International Criminal Court, and New Frameworks for Assessing Noncompliance’ (2024) 68(2) International Studies Quarterly 1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, Robert, ‘The Judicial Enforcement of International Obligations’ (1987) 47(1) ZaöRV 324Google Scholar
Jónsdóttir, Helga, ‘The Kyoto Protocol Compliance System: Is the System Effective Enough to Ensure Compliance?’, Thesis, Stockholms universitet, 2013Google Scholar
Joyce, Edward J., and Biddle, Gary C., ‘Anchoring and Adjustment in Probabilistic Inference in Auditing’ (1981) 19(1) Journal of Accounting Research 120145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaempfer, William H., and Lowenberg, Anton D., ‘Unilateral Versus Multilateral International Sanctions: A Public Choice Perspective’ (1999) 43(1) International Studies Quarterly 3758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalala, Tshibangu, ‘La décision de l’O.U.A. de ne plus respecter les sanctions décrétées par l’O.N.U. Contre la Libye: désobéissance civile des États africains à l’égard de l’O.N.U.’ (1999) 32(2) Revue Belge de Droit International 545568Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, Jörg, ‘Uncertainty in the Formal Sources of International Law: Customary International Law and Some of Its Problems’ (2004) 15(3) European Journal of International Law 523553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamminga, Menno T., ‘Confiscating Russia’s Frozen Central Bank Assets: A Permissible Third-Party Countermeasure?’ (2023) 70(1) Netherlands International Law Review 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearns, Jason E., and Charnovitz, Steve, ‘Adjudicating Compliance in the WTO: A Review of DSU Article 21.5’ (2002) 5(2) Journal of International Economic Law 331352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Helen, Corina, Heri, and Réka, Piskóty, ‘Something Ventured, Nothing Gained? – Remedies before the ECtHR and Their Potential for Climate Change Cases’ (2022) 22(3) Human Rights Law Review 132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, ‘Sanctions under the Charter of the United Nations’ (1946) 12(4) Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 429441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, ‘Compulsory Adjudication of International Disputes’ (1943) 37(3) American Journal of International Law 397406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, ‘The Pure Theory of Law and Analytical Jurisprudence’ (1941) 55(1) Harvard Law Review 4470Google Scholar
Khachvani, David, ‘Compensation for Unlawful Expropriation: Targeting the Illegality’ (2017) 32(2) ICSID Review 385403Google Scholar
Kindji, Kévine, and Faure, Michael, ‘Assessing Reparation of Environmental Damage by the ICJ: A Lost Opportunity?’ (2019) 57 Questions of International Law 533Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, ‘Foreword: Is the Proliferation of International Courts and Tribunals a Systemic Problem’ (1999) 31(4) New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 679696Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, ‘The Concept of Compliance as a Function of Competing Conceptions of International Law’ (1998) 19(2) Michigan Journal of International Law 345Google Scholar
Kiššová, Sára, ‘An Overview of the Doctrine of Ultra Vires from the Perspective of the German Federal Constitutional Court and the Polish Constitutional Court’ (2022) 2(1) Slovak Yearbook of European Union Law 3358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju, ‘Internalization through Socialization’ (2005) 54(4) Duke Law Journal 975982Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju, ‘The Future of Lou Henkin’s Human Rights Movement’ (2007) 38(2) Columbia Human Rights Law Review 487504Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Case Concerning Passage through the Great Belt’ (1996) 27(3) Ocean Development & International Law 255269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘The Place of Law in Collective Security’ (1996) 17(2) Michigan Journal of International Law 455490Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D., ‘Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’ (1982) 36(2) International Organization 185205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriebaum, Ursula, ‘Evaluating Social Benefits and Costs of Investment Treaties: Depoliticization of Investment Disputes’, in Katia Fach Gómez, Gourgourinis, Anastasios, and Titi, Catherine (eds.), International Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict (Cham: Springer, 2020), 231254Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju, ‘Why Do Nations Obey International Law?’ (1997) 106(8) Yale Law Journal 25992659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronman, Anthony, ‘Hart, Austin, and the Concept of a Legal System: The Primacy of Sanctions’ (1974–1975) 84(3) Yale Law Journal 584607Google Scholar
Kubálková, Vendulka, ‘Foreign Policy, International Politics, and Constructivism’, in Kubálková, Vendulka (ed.), Foreign Policy in a Constructed World (New York: M.E. Sharpe, 2001), 1537Google Scholar
Kulick, Andreas, ‘Article 60 ICJ Statute, Interpretation Proceedings, and the Competing Concepts of Res Judicata’ (2015) 28(1) Leiden Journal of International Law 73100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwiatkowska, Barbara, ‘Southern Bluefin Tuna (New Zealand v. Japan; Australia v. Japan), Order on Provisional Measures (ITLOS Cases Nos. 3 and 4)’ (2000) 94(1) American Journal of International Law 150159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafer, Celso, ‘The Dispute Settlement System in the World Trade Organization’, Gilberto Amado Memorial Lecture, 18 June 1996Google Scholar
Lamp, Nicolas, ‘How Some Countries Became ‘Special’: Developing Countries and the Construction of Difference in Multilateral Trade Lawmaking’ (2015) 18(4) Journal of International Economic Law 743771Google Scholar
Langford, Malcolm, Behn, Daniel, and Lie, Runar Hilleren, ‘The Revolving Door in International Investment Arbitration’ (2017) 20(2) Journal of International Economic Law 301331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanzoni, Niccolò, ‘The Authority of ICJ Advisory Opinions as Precedents: The Mauritius/Maldives Case’ (2022) 2(1) Italian Review of International and Comparative Law 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauterpacht, Elihu, ‘Partial Judgments and the Inherent Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice’, in Lowe, Vaughan and Fitzmaurice, Malgosia (eds.), Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice – Essays in Honour of Sir Robert Jennings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 465486Google Scholar
Laycock, Douglas, ‘How Remedies Became a Field: A History’ (2008) 27 Review of Litigation 161, 165Google Scholar
Leach, Philip, ‘Beyond the Bug River – A New Dawn for Redress before the European Court of Human Rights?’ (2005) 10(2) European Human Rights Law Review 148Google Scholar
Leczykiewicz, Dorota, ‘Effectiveness of EU Law before National Courts: Direct Effect, Effective Judicial Protection, and State Liability’, in Arnull, Anthony and Chalmers, Damian (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 212239Google Scholar
Lieblich, Eliav, ‘The Death and Life of the Prohibition on Forcible Reprisals’, (2025) 51 Yale Journal of International Law [forthcoming]Google Scholar
Lipson, Michael, ‘Transaction Cost Estimation and International Regimes: Of Crystal Balls and Sheriff’s Posses’ (2004) 6(1) International Studies Review 122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lixinski, Lucas, ‘Mechanisms of Systemic Change in Regional Human Rights Courts: Switching between Legitimacy and Impact’ (2019) 8(1) Cambridge International Law Journal 60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longobardo, Marco, ‘The Italian Constitutional Court’s Ruling against State Immunity When International Crimes Occur: Thoughts on Decision No 238 of 2014’ (2015) 16(1) Melbourne Journal of International Law 255Google Scholar
Longobardo, Marco, ‘State Immunity and Judicial Countermeasures’ (2021) 32(2) European Journal of International Law 457484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, Vaughan, ‘Res Judicata and the Rule of Law in International Arbitration’ (1996) 8(1) African Journal of International and Comparative Law 3858Google Scholar
Maggi, Giovanni, ‘The Role of Multilateral Institutions in International Trade Cooperation’ (1999) 89(1) The American Economic Review 190214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magid, Per, ‘The Post-Adjudicative Phase’, in Pack, Connie and Lee, Roy S. (eds.), Increasing the Effectiveness of the International Court of Justice – Proceedings of the ICJ/UNITAR Colloquium to Celebrate the 50th Anniversary of the Court (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 1997), 324347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magliveras, Konstantinos D., ‘Legal and Procedural Issues Arising from the Expulsion of the Russian Federation from the Council of Europe’ (2023) 23(1) International and Comparative Law Review 95116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, F.A., ‘The Consequences of an International Wrong in International and National Law’ (1976) 48(1) British Yearbook of International Law 165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle, and Tomazos, Anastasios, ‘Comments on Joost Pauwelyn’s Paper: “How to Win a WTO Dispute Based on Non-WTO Law?”‘, in Griller, Stefan (ed.), At the Crossroads (Wien: Springer, 2008), 5585Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P., ‘The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders’ (2005) 52(4) International Organization 943969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, Simon, ‘Non-Compliance Procedures’ (2016) 27 Yearbook of International Environmental Law 131136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Lisa L., ‘against Compliance’, in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 591610Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa L., ‘Credibility, Costs, and Institutions: Cooperation on Economic Sanctions’ (1993) 45(3) World Politics 406432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C., ‘Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place’ (2000) 11(4) European Journal of International Law 763813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Pierre, ‘Imperium et mesures provisoires’, in Haldy, Jacques, Rapp, Jean-Marie, and Ferrari, Phidias (eds.), Mélanges de procédure et d’arbitrage en l’honneur de Jean-François Poudret (Lausanne: Université de Lausanne, 1999), 437456Google Scholar
McAdams, Richard H., ‘The Expressive Power of Adjudication’ (2005) 2005(5) University of Illinois Law Review 10431121Google Scholar
McGregor, Lorna, ‘State Immunity and Human Rights: Is There a Future after Germany v. Italy?’ (2013) 11(1) Journal of International Criminal Justice 125145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, Juliette, ‘Declaratory Judgments of the International Court of Justice’ (2012) 25 Hague Yearbook of International Law 107158Google Scholar
McIntyre, JulietteRules Are Rules: Reconceiving Monetary Gold as a Rule of Procedure, (2021) 115 AJIL Unbound 144148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, Campbell, ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(C) of the Vienna Convention’ (2005) 54(2) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 279319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J., ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’ (1995) 19(3) International Security 549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric, ‘Mixed Claim Commissions and the Once Centrality of the Protection of Aliens’, in De la Rasilla, Ignacio and Viñuales, Jorge (eds.), Experiments in International Adjudication: Historical Accounts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019), 89117Google Scholar
Mendel, Mark E., ‘Retaliation in the WTO: The Experience of Antigua and Barbuda in US – Gambling’, in Bown, Chad P. and Pauwelyn, Joost (eds.), The Law, Economics and Politics of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 310318Google Scholar
Mercurio, Bryan, ‘Why Compensation Cannot Replace Trade Retaliation in the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding’ (2009) 8(2) World Trade Review 315338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meshel, Tamar, ‘225 Years to the Jay Treaty: Interstate Arbitration between Progress and Stagnation’ (2020) 3(1) International Comparative, Policy & Ethics Law Review 134Google Scholar
Methymaki, Eleni, and Tzanakopoulos, Antonios, ‘Freedom with Their Exception: Jurisdiction and Immunity as Rule and Exception’, in Bartels, Lorand and Paddeu, Federica (eds.), Exceptions in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020), 158181Google Scholar
Methymaki, Eleni, and Tzanakopoulos, Antonios, ‘Mechanisms of Systemic Change in Regional Human Rights Courts: Swinging the Pendulum between Legitimacy and Impact’ (2019) 8(1) Cambridge International Law Journal 6083Google Scholar
Michaels, Ralf, and Joost, Pauwelyn, ‘Conflict of Norms or Conflict of Laws: Different Techniques in the Fragmentation of Public International Law’ (2012) 22(3) Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 349376Google Scholar
Milanovic, Marko, ‘State Responsibility for Genocide: A Follow-Up’ (2007) 18(4) European Journal of International Law 669694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, Cameron, ‘Provisional Measures and the “New” Plausibility in the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice’ (2018) 88(1) British Yearbook of International Law 149Google Scholar
Miron, M.C., ‘International Law and Religion in Latin America: The Beagle Channel Dispute’ (2005) 28(1) Suffolk Transnational Law Review 134Google Scholar
Mitchell, Ronald B., ‘Compliance Theory: An Overview’, in Cameron, James, Werksman, Jacob, and Roderick, Peter (eds.), Improving Compliance with International Environmental Law (London: Earthscan, 1996), 328Google Scholar
Moehlecke, Carolina, ‘The Chilling Effect of International Investment Disputes: Limited Challenges to State Sovereignty’ (2020) 64(1) International Studies Quarterly 125145Google Scholar
Moiseienko, Anton, ‘Legal: The Freezing of the Russian Central Bank’s Assets’ (2023) 34(4) European Journal of International Law 10071020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montana i Mora, Miguel, ‘A GATT With Teeth: Law Wins over Politics in the Resolution of International Trade Disputes’ (1993) 31(1) Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 131–195Google Scholar
Moore, John Norton, ‘Enhancing Compliance with International Law: A Neglected Remedy’ (1999) 39(4) Virginia Journal of International Law 8811016Google Scholar
Moser, Patricia Tarre, ‘Non-Recognition of State Immunity as a Judicial Countermeasure to Jus Cogens Violations: The Human Rights Answer to the ICJ Decision on the Ferrini Case’ (2012) 4(3) Gottingen Journal of International Law 809852Google Scholar
Mutangi, Tarisai, ‘Enforcing Compliance with the Judgments of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights: Prospects and Challenges’, in Aderomola, Adeola (ed.), Compliance with International Human Rights Law in Africa (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022), 183232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Steven Lee, ‘Russia Releases Greenpeace Ship’ (6 June 2014) New York TimesGoogle Scholar
Negm, Namira, ‘The Sanctions Regime of the African Union in Response to Unconstitutional Changes of Government’, in Johnstone, Ian and Ratner, Steven (eds.), Talking International Law: Legal Argumentation outside the Courtroom (New York: Oxford University Press, 2022), 218245Google Scholar
Newton, Michael, ‘Reconsidering Reprisals’ (2010) 20(3) Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 361388Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, André, ‘The Role of National Courts in Inducing Compliance with International and European Law: A Comparison’, in Cremona, Marise (ed.), Compliance and the Enforcement of EU Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 125147Google Scholar
Norman, George, and Trachtman, Joel P., ‘The Customary International Law Game’ (2005) 99(3) American Journal of International Law 541580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nossal, Kim Richard, ‘International Sanctions as International Punishment’ (1989) 43(2) International Organization 301322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nottage, Hunter, ‘Evaluating the Criticism That WTO Retaliation Rules Undermine the Utility of WTO Dispute Settlement for Developing Countries’, in Bown, Chad P. and Pauwelyn, Joost (eds.), The Law, Economics and Politics of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 319338Google Scholar
Nzelibe, Jide, ‘The Case against Reforming the WTO Enforcement Mechanism’ (2008) 1(1) University of Illinois Law Review 319363Google Scholar
Nzelibe, Jide, ‘The Credibility Imperative: The Political Dynamics of Retaliation in the World Trade Organization’s Dispute Resolution Mechanism’ (2005) 6(1) Theoretical Inquiries in Law 215254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberthür, Sebastian, and Lefeber, René, ‘Holding Countries to Account: The Kyoto Protocol’s Compliance System Revisited After Four Years of Experience’ (2010) 1(1) Climate Law 133158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connell, Mary Ellen, ‘Debating the Law of Sanctions’ (2002) 13(1) European Journal of International Law 6379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connell, Mary Ellen, ‘The Popular But Unlawful Armed Reprisal’ (2018) 44 Ohio Northern University Law Review 325Google Scholar
O’Connor, Bernard, and Margareta, Djordjevic, ‘Practical Aspects of Monetary Compensation: The US – Copyright Case’ (2005) 8(1) Journal of International Economic Law 127154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oellers-Frahm, Karin, ‘Article 94 UN Charter’, in Zimmerman, Andreas et al. (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 159181Google Scholar
Oellers-Frahm, Karin, ‘Multiplication of International Courts and Tribunals and Conflicting Jurisdiction – Problems and Possible Solutions’ (2001) 5(1) Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online 67104Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, Alexander, ‘Political Life of Treaties: Indeterminacy, Interpretation and Political Consequences’ (2021) 20(3) Chinese Journal of International Law 545560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osiander, Andreas, ‘Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth’ (2001) 55(2) International Organization 251287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palestini, Stefano, ‘Regional Organizations and the Politics of Sanctions against Undemocratic Behaviour in the Americas’ (2021) 42(4) International Political Science Review 469483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmeter, David, and Alexandrov, Stanimir A., ‘“Inducing Compliance” in WTO Dispute Settlement’, in Kennedy, Daniel L. M and Southwick, James D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade – Essays in Honour of Robert E. Hudec (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 646670Google Scholar
Papanicolopulu, Irini, ‘Procedures and Mechanisms on Compliance under the 1976/1995 Barcelona Convention on the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea and its Protocols’, in Treves, Tullio et al. (eds.), Non-Compliance Procedures and Mechanisms and the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 165182Google Scholar
Paparinskis, Martins, ‘A Case against Crippling Compensation in International Law of State Responsibility’ (2020) 83(6) Modern Law Review 12461286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paparinskis, Martins, ‘Investors’ Remedies under EU Law and International Investment Law’ (2016) 17(6) Journal of World Investment & Trade 919945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parisi, Francesco, and Ghei, Nita, ‘The Role of Reciprocity in International Law’ (2004) 36(1) Cornell Journal of International Law 93123Google Scholar
Paulsson, Jan, ‘Arbitration without Privity’ (1995) 10(2) ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 232257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulsson, Jan, ‘Jurisdiction and Admissibility’, in Global Reflections on International Law: Commerce and Dispute Resolution: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Robert Briner (Paris: ICC Publishing, 2005), 601617Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Editorial Comment: Adding Sweeteners to Softwood Lumber: The WTO–NAFTA “Spaghetti Bowl” is Cooking’ (2006) 9(1) Journal of International Economic Law 197206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Enforcement and Countermeasures in the WTO: Rules Are Rules – Toward a More Collective Approach’ (2000) 94(2) American Journal of International Law 335347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavel, Carmen E., ‘Is International Law a Hartian Legal System?’ (2018) 31(3) Ratio Juris 307325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavone, Tommaso, and Daniel Kelemen, R., ‘The Evolving Judicial Politics of European Integration: The European Court of Justice and National Courts Revisited’ (2019) 25(4) European Law Journal 352373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peat, Daniel C., ‘Perception and Process: Towards a Behavioural Theory of Compliance’ (2022) 13(2) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 179203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peat, Daniel, Veronika, Fikfak, and van der Zee, Eva, ‘Behavioural Compliance Theory’ (2022) 13(2) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 167178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelc, Krzysztof J., ‘The Politics of Precedent in International Law: A Social Network Application’ (2014) 108(3) American Political Science Review 547564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellet, Alain, ‘The ILC’s Articles on State Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts and Related Texts’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain, and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 7594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellet, Alain, and Müller, Daniel, ‘Article 38’, in Zimmermann, Andreas, Tams, Christian J., Oellers-Frahm, Karin, and Tomuschat, Christian (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary, 3rd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), 9241008Google Scholar
Pollack, Mark A., ‘Political Science in International Adjudication’, in Romano, Cesare P. R., Alter, Karen J., and Shany, Yuval (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 388407Google Scholar
Prete, Luca, ‘The Systemic Criterion in the Use of Infringement Proceedings’ (2023) 24(5) German Law Journal 10111032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priem, Claudia, ‘International Investment Treaty Arbitration as a Potential Check for Domestic Courts Refusing Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards’ (2013) 10 NYU Journal of Law & Business 189221Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D., ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games’ (1988) 42(2) International Organization 427460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puig, Sergio, ‘No Right without a Remedy: Foundations of Investor-State Arbitration’ (2014) 35(3) University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 829861Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, and Anne-Marie, Slaughter, ‘International Law, International Relations and Compliance’, in Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A (eds.), The Handbook of International Relations (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002), 538558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph, ‘Authority and Justification’ (1985) 14(1) Philosophy & Public Affairs 329Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, ‘Authority, Morality and Law’ (1985) 68(3) Monist 195324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph, ‘The Problem of Authority: Revisiting the Service Conception’ (2006) 90(4) Minnesota Law Review 10031044Google Scholar
Reinisch, August, ‘The Use and Limits of Res Judicata and Lis Pendens as Procedural Tools to Avoid Conflicting Dispute Settlement Outcomes’ (2004) 3 Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 3777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisman, W. Michael, ‘The Enforcement of International Judgments’ (1969) 63 American Journal of International Law 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, Sylvia A., ‘The Article 21.5/22 Problem: Clarification through Bilateral Agreements?’ (2000) 3(4) Journal of International Economic Law 553568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigaux, Francois, ‘Hans Kelsen on International Law’ (1998) 9 European Journal of International Law 381408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripley, Charles, ‘The Central American Court of Justice (1907–1918): Rethinking the World’s First Court’ (2018) 19(1) Diálogos 4772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogstad, Adrian, ‘When Stigmatization Fails: Russia and Aggression in Ukraine’ (2022) 7(4) Journal of Global Security Studies 120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, Cesare P.R., ‘Legitimacy, Authority, and Performance: Contemporary Anxieties of International Courts and Tribunals’ (2020) 114(1) American Journal of International Law 149163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, Cesare P.R., ‘The Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies: The Pieces of the Puzzle’ (1999) 31(4) N.Y.U. Journal of International Law & Policy 709Google Scholar
Root, Elihu, ‘The Sanction of International Law’ (1908) 2 ASIL Proceedings 1427Google Scholar
Rose, Cecily, ‘Appeal Relating to the Jurisdiction of the ICAO Council’ (2021) 115(2) American Journal of International Law 301316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, Gregory, ‘Reconsidering the Auctoritas of Augustus’ (2013) 103 Journal of Roman Studies 115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruse-Khan, Henning Grosse, ‘A Pirate of the Caribbean? The Attraction of Suspending TRIPS Obligations’ (2008) 11(2) Journal of International Economic Law 313357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruys, Tom, ‘Sanctions, Retortions and Countermeasures: Concepts and International Legal Framework’, in van den Herik, Larissa (ed.), Research Handbook on UN Sanctions and International Law (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2017), 1950Google Scholar
Sand, Peter H., ‘Enforcing CITES: The Rise and Fall of Trade Sanctions’ (2013) 22(3) Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 251263Google Scholar
Sarkin, Jeremy Julian, ‘Will the International Criminal Court (ICC) Be Able to Secure the Arrest of Vladimir Putin When He Travels? Understanding State Cooperation through Other ICC Non-Arrest Cases against Malawi, Chad, Nigeria, the Democratic Republic of Congo, South Africa, Djibouti, Uganda, and Jordan’ (2023) 12(1) International Human Rights Law Review 2668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scelle, Georges, ‘Le phénomène juridique du dédoublement fonctionnel’, in Schätzel, Walter (ed.), Rechtsfragen der Internationalen Organisation – Festschriftfir H. Wehberg (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1956), 324342Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, ‘Compensation for Expropriation’ (1984) 78(1) American Journal of International Law 121130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, ‘The Enforcement of International Judicial and Arbitral Decisions’ (1960) 54(1) American Journal of International Law 124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, ‘The Quasi-Judicial Role of the Security Council and the General Assembly’ (1964) 58(4) American Journal of International Law 962984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, Frederick, ‘Was Austin Right After All? On the Role of Sanctions in a Theory of Law’ (2010) 22 Ratio Juris 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank, and Ulrich, Sedelmeier, ‘Governance by Conditionality: EU Rule Transfer to the Candidate Countries of Central and Eastern Europe’ (2004) 11(5) Journal of European Public Policy 661679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N., ‘Below the Threshold Cyber Operations: The Countermeasures Response Option and International Law’ (2014) 54(3) Virginia Journal of International Law 697732Google Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Non-Pecuniary Remedies in ICSID Arbitration’ (2004) 20(4) International Arbitration 325332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph, ‘The Brčko Award of 14 February 1997’ (1998) 11(1) Leiden Journal of International Law 7184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Warren F., and Sykes, Alan O., ‘The Economic Structure of Renegotiation and Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organization’ (2002) 31(S1) The Journal of Legal Studies S179S204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scobbie, Ian, ‘Res Judicata, Precedent and the International Court: A Preliminary Sketch’ (1999) 20 Australian Yearbook of International Law 299317Google Scholar
Scott, James Brown, ‘The Hague Court Reports’ (Hague: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1916)Google Scholar
Sending, Ole Jacob, ‘Constitution, Choice and Change: Problems with the “Logic of Appropriateness” and Its Use in Constructivist Theory’ (2002) 8(4) European Journal of International Relations 443470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory, and Ganin, Daniel, ‘Extrapolating Purpose from Practice: Rebalancing or Inducing Compliance’, in Bown, Chad P. and Pauwelyn, Joost (eds.), The Law, Economics and Politics of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 73108Google Scholar
Shany, Yuval, ‘Jurisdiction and Admissibility’, in Romano, Cesare P. R., Alter, Karen J., and Shany, Yuval (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 779804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Scott J., ‘Authority’, in Jules L. Coleman, Kenneth Einar Himma, and Scott J. Shapiro (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 382439Google Scholar
Shaw, Malcolm N., ‘A Practical Look at the International Court of Justice’, in Evans, Malcolm D. (ed.), Remedies in International Law: The Institutional Dilemma (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998), 201221Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn, and Finnemore, Martha, ‘Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics’ (2001) 4 Annual Review of Political Science 391416Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno, ‘From Bilateralism to Community Interests’ (1994) 250 RdC 217–384Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno, ‘Reciprocity’ (2008) Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law para. 1–15Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno, and Tams, Christian J., ‘1969 Vienna Convention: Article 60 – Termination or Suspension of the Operation of a Treaty as a Consequence of Its Breach’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 13511378Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., ‘Compliance with International Agreements’ (1998) 1 Annual Review of Political Science 7593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter Burley, Anne-Marie, ‘International Law and International Relations: A Dual Agenda’ (1993) 87(2) American Journal of International Law 205239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith-van Lin, Lorraine, ‘Non-Compliance and the Law and Politics of State Cooperation: Lessons from the Al Bashir and Kenyatta Cases’, in Bekou, Olympia and Birkett, Daley (eds.), Cooperation and the International Criminal Court: Perspectives from Theory and Practice (Leiden: Brill/Nijhoff, 2016), 114140Google Scholar
Snyder, Franklin G., ‘Nomos, Narrative, and Adjudication: Toward a Jurisgenetic Theory of Law’ (1999) 40(5) William and Mary Law Review 16231725Google Scholar
Steinberg, Richard, ‘Wanted – Dead or Alive: Realism in International Law’, in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 146172Google Scholar
Stevenson, Drury D., ‘Reverse Bifurcation’ (2008) 75(4) University of Cincinnati Law Review 213261Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E. and Andrew Kosenko, A Proposal for Russian Asset Seizure, (2024) Economic Studies at BrookingsGoogle Scholar
Stoler, Andrew L., ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement Process: Did the Negotiators Get What They Wanted?’ (2004) 3(1) World Trade Review 99118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoltz, Daniella, and Van Schaack, Beth, ‘It’s Never Too Late to Say “I’m Sorry”: Sovereign Apologies over the Years’, Just Security (2021)Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., ‘Social Norms and Social Roles’ (1996) 96 Columbia Law Review 903968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., ‘On the Expressive Function of Law’ (1996) 144(5) University of Pennsylvania Law Review 20212053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, Alan O., ‘Constructive Unilateral Threats in International Commercial Relations: The Limited Case for Section 301’ (1992) 23(2) Law and Policy in International Business 263330Google Scholar
Sykes, Alan O., ‘Optimal Sanctions in the WTO: The Case for Decoupling’ (2019) 14 Journal of International Economic Law 545570Google Scholar
Sykes, Alan O., ‘Optimal Sanctions in the WTO: The Case for Decoupling (and the Uneasy Case for the Status Quo)’, in Bown, Chad P. and Pauwelyn, Joost (eds.), The Law, Economics and Politics of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 339371Google Scholar
Sykes, Alan O., ‘Public Versus Private Enforcement of International Economic Law: Standing and Remedy’ (2005) 34(2) Journal of Legal Studies 631666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, Alan O., ‘The Remedy for Breach of Obligations under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Damages or Specific Performance?’, in Bronckers, Marco and Quick, Reinhard (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honour of John H. Jackson (The Hague: Kluwer, 2000), 347357Google Scholar
Szabó, Marcel, ‘The Implementation of the Judgment of the ICJ in the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Dispute’ (2009) 39(4) Environmental Policy and Law 97103Google Scholar
Tallerico, Thomas J., and Behrendt, J. Adam, ‘The Use of Bifurcation and Direct Testimony Witness Statements in International Commercial Arbitration Proceedings’ (2003) 3(1) Journal of International Arbitration 2045Google Scholar
Talmon, Stefan A. G., ‘The South China Sea Arbitration: Is There a Case to Answer?’, in Talmon, Stefan and Jia, Bing Bing (eds.), The South China Sea Arbitration: A Chinese Perspective (Oxford: Hart, 2014), 1558Google Scholar
Thirlway, Hugh, ‘The Indication of Provisional Measures by the International Court of Justice’, in Bernhardt, Rudolf (ed.), Interim Measures indicated by International Courts (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994), 135Google Scholar
Thirlway, Hugh, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960–1989’ (2011) 81(1) British Yearbook of International Law 13170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Alexander, ‘The Rational Enforcement of International Law: Solving the Sanctioners’ Dilemma’ (2009) 1(2) International Theory 307321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thouvenin, Jean-Marc, ‘Articulating UN Sanctions with Unilateral Restrictive Measures’, in Beaucillon, Charlotte (ed.), Research Handbook on Unilateral and Extraterritorial Sanctions (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2021), 152174Google Scholar
Tomuschat, Christian, ‘Article 19’, in Simma, Bruno et al. (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, Volume I, 3rd (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 650681Google Scholar
Tomuschat, Christian, ‘Obligations Arising for States without or against Their Will’ (1993) 241 RdC 269374Google Scholar
Torterola, Ignacio, and Gosis, Diego Brian, ‘Argentina’, in Hamilton, Jonathan C., Garía-Bolívar, Omar E., and Otero, Hernando (eds.), Latin American Arbitration and Investment Protection (Leiden: Brill, 2012), 543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, Jesse, ‘Medellín Stands Alone: Common Law Nations Do Not Show a Shared Postratification Understanding of the ICJ’ (2009) 34(2) Yale Journal of International Law 463495Google Scholar
Trachtman, Joel P., ‘The WTO Cathedral’ (2007) 43(1) Stanford Journal of International Law 127167Google Scholar
Triepel, Heinrich, Droit international et droit interne (Paris: Pédone, 1920)Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel, ‘Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’ (1974) 185(4157) Science 11241131CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel, ‘The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice’ (1981) 211(4481) Science 453458CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tzanakopoulos, Antonios, ‘The Right to Be Free from Economic Coercion’ (2015) 4(3) Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 616633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urs, Priya, ‘Obligations Erga Omnes and the Question of Standing before the International Court of Justice’ (2021) 34(2) Leiden Journal of International Law 505525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urs, Priya, ‘The Elusiveness of “Interdependent Obligations” and the Invocation of Responsibility for Their Breach’ (2024) British Yearbook of International Law 1–48Google Scholar
Valles, Cherise M., and Brendan, McGivern, ‘The Right to Retaliate under the WTO Agreement: The “Sequencing Problem”‘ (2000) 34(3) Journal of World Trade 6384Google Scholar
van Aaken, Anne, ‘Behavioral International Law and Economics’ (2014) 55 (2) Harvard International Law Journal 421481Google Scholar
van Aaken, Anne, ‘Primary and Secondary Remedies in International Investment Law and National State Liability: A Functional and Comparative View’, in Schill, Stephan W. (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 721756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Aaken, Anne, and Betül, Simsek, ‘Rewarding in International Law’ (2021) 115(2) American Journal of International Law 195241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Erp, Judith, ‘Shaming and Compliance’, in van Rooij, Benjamin and Sokol, Daniel (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Compliance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021), 438460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Rooij, Benjamin, ‘Behavioral Jurisprudence: The Quest for Knowledge about the Ex-Ante Function of Law and Behavior’ (2020) 22(1) Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies 5777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venzke, Ingo, ‘Between Power and Persuasion: On International Institutions’ Authority in Making Law’ (2013) 4(3) Transnational Legal Theory 354373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeer-Künzli, Annemarieke, ‘Diallo: Between Diplomatic Protection and Human Rights’ (2013) 4(3) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 487514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidigal, Geraldo, ‘Enforcing Democracy at the Regional Level: Paraguay’s Suspension before the Mercosur Court’ (2013) 2(2) Cambridge International Law Journal 337349Google Scholar
Vidigal, Geraldo, ‘Living without the Appellate Body: Multilateral, Bilateral and Plurilateral Solutions to the WTO Dispute Settlement Crisis’ (2019) 20(6) Journal of World Investment & Trade 862890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidigal, Geraldo, ‘Re-Assessing WTO Remedies: The Prospective and the Retrospective’ (2013) 16(3) Journal of International Economic Law 505–534Google Scholar
Vidigal, Geraldo, ‘Regional Trade Adjudication and the Rise of Sustainability Disputes: Korea – Labor Commitments and Ukraine – Wood Export Bans’ (2022) 116(3) American Journal of International Law 567–590Google Scholar
Vidigal, Geraldo, ‘Remedies and Compliance’, in Bethlehem, Daniel, McRae, Donald, Neufeld, Rodney, and Van Damme, Isabelle (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022), 967990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidigal, Geraldo, ‘Why Is There So Little Litigation under Free Trade Agreements? Retaliation and Adjudication in International Dispute Settlement’ (2017) 20(4) Journal of International Economic Law 927–956Google Scholar
Viñuales, Jorge E., and Bentolila, Dolores, ‘The Use of Alternative (Non-Judicial) Means to Enforce Investment Awards against States’, in Laurence Boisson de Chazournes, Kohen, Marcelo, and Viñuales, Jorge E. (eds.), Diplomatic and Judicial Means of Dispute Settlement (Leiden: Brill, 2012), 247272Google Scholar
von Stein, Jana, ‘The Engines of Compliance’, in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 477501Google Scholar
Walker, Herman, ‘The Chicken War’ (1964) 58(3) American Journal of International Law 671–685Google Scholar
Webber, Jeremy, ‘The Grammar of Customary Law’ (2009) 54(4) McGill Law Journal 579–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weil, Prosper, ‘Towards Relative Normativity in International Law?’ (1983) 77(3) American Journal of International Law 413442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H., ‘The Transformation of Europe’ (1991) 100(8) Yale Law Journal 24032483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’ (1992) 46(2) International Organization 391425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendtlandt, Matthew, ‘SGS v Philippines and the Role of ICSID Tribunals in Investor-State Contract Disputes’ (2008) 43(3) Texas International Law Journal 523564Google Scholar
White, Nigel, and Abass, Ademola, ‘Countermeasures and Sanctions’, in Evans, Malcolm (ed.), International Law, 3rd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 521547Google Scholar
Wuerth, Ingrid, ‘Compliance’, in d’Aspremont, Jean and Singh, Sahib (eds.), Concepts for International Law: Contributions to Disciplinary Thought (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2019), 117134Google Scholar
Yannaca-Small, Katia, ‘Case Comment – BIVAC v Paraguay versus SGS v Paraguay – The Umbrella Clause Still in Search of One Identity’ (2013) 28(2) ICSID Review 307340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoo, John C., and Posner, Eric, ‘Judicial Independence in International Tribunals’ (2005) 93(1) California Law Review 174Google Scholar
Yoshida, O., ‘Soft Enforcement of Treaties: The Montreal Protocol’s Noncompliance Procedure and the Functions of Internal International Institutions’ (1999) 10(2) Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 95142Google Scholar
Zarbiyev, Fuad, ‘International Law in an Age of Post-Shame’ (2020) 9(3) ESIL Reflections 115Google Scholar
Ziemele, Ineta, ‘International Courts and Ultra Vires Acts’, in Caflisch et al. (eds.), Droits de l’Homme – Regards de Strasbourg. Liber Amicorum Luzius Wildhaber (Kehl am Rhein: N.P. Engel, 2007), 537558Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Wim, Beyond Indeterminacy: On Reputation and Interpretation in International Law’ (PhD Thesis defended at the University of Amsterdam, 2023, on file with author)Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Inaccessible, or known limited accessibility

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The PDF of this book is known to have missing or limited accessibility features. We may be reviewing its accessibility for future improvement, but final compliance is not yet assured and may be subject to legal exceptions. If you have any questions, please contact accessibility@cambridge.org.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Visualised data also available as non-graphical data
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Geraldo Vidigal, University of Amsterdam
  • Book: Adjudicating over Anarchy
  • Online publication: 18 December 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316673072.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Geraldo Vidigal, University of Amsterdam
  • Book: Adjudicating over Anarchy
  • Online publication: 18 December 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316673072.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Geraldo Vidigal, University of Amsterdam
  • Book: Adjudicating over Anarchy
  • Online publication: 18 December 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316673072.015
Available formats
×