Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 October 2025
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- 2 Peter , pp. 245 - 256Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Achtemeier, Paul J., Green, Joel B., and Thompson, Marianne Meye. Introducing the New Testament: Its Literature and Theology. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2001.Google Scholar
Anatolios, Khaled. Deification through the Cross: An Eastern Christian Theology of Salvation. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2020.Google Scholar
Arndt, William, et al. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Auksi, Peter. Christian Plain Style: The Evolution of a Spiritual Ideal. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Aune, David E. Rereading Paul Together: Protestant and Catholic Perspectives on Justification. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2006.Google Scholar
Barclay, Katie. “Love and Violence in the Music of Late Modernity.” Popular Music and Society 41.5 (2018): 539–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartholomew, Craig G., and Goheen, Michael W.. “Story and Biblical Theology.” In Out of Egypt: Biblical Theology and Biblical Interpretation. Edited by Bartholomew, Craig, Healy, Mary, Moller, Karl, and Parry, Robin, 144–71. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2004.Google Scholar
Bateman, Herbert W. IV. “‘Memories’ about the Old Testament in Jewish and Christian Tradition Inform 2 Peter and Jude, Part 1.” JETS 67.1 (2024): 103–12.Google Scholar
Bates, Matthew. Salvation by Allegiance Alone: Rethinking Faith, Works, and the Gospel of Jesus the King. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2017.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard J. “The Apocalypse of Peter: A Jewish Christian Apocalypse from the Time of Bar Kokhba.” Apocrypha 5 (1994): 7–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauckham, Richard J. Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2008.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard J. Jesus and the God of Israel: God Crucified and Other Studies on the New Testament’s Christology of Divine Identity. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2008.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard J. “2 Peter and the Apocalypse of Peter Revisited: A Response to Jörg Frey.” In 2 Peter and the Apocalypse of Peter: Towards a New Perspective. Edited by Frey, Jörg, Dulk, Matthijs, and van der Watt, Jan, 261–81. Leiden: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Baum, Armin D. “Content and Form: Authorship Attribution and Pseudonymity in Ancient Speeches, Letters, Lectures, and Translations – A Rejoinder to Bart Ehrman.” JBL 136.2 (2017): 381–403.Google Scholar
Beilby, James K., and Eddy, Paul Rhodes. Justification: Five Views. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2011.Google Scholar
Bernier, Jonathan. Rethinking the Dates of the New Testament: The Evidence for Early Composition. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2022.Google Scholar
Bigg, Charles. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistles of St. Peter and St. Jude, ICC. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1910.Google Scholar
Bird, Michael F. The Gospel of the Lord: How the Early Church Wrote the Story of Jesus. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2014.Google Scholar
Bloesch, Donald. Holy Scripture: Revelation, Inspiration, & Interpretation. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2005.Google Scholar
Boda, Mark J. The Heartbeat of Old Testament Theology: Three Creedal Expressions, Acadia Studies in Bible and Theology. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2017.Google Scholar
Bonhoeffer, Dietrich. Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s Christmas Sermons. Translated and edited by Robertson, Edwin H.. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2011.Google Scholar
Boobyer, G. H. “The Indebtedness of 2 Peter to 1 Peter.” In New Testament Essays: Studies in Memory of T. W. Manson. Edited by Higgins, A. J. B., 34–53. Manchester: University of Manchester Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Boring, Eugene M. An Introduction to the New Testament: History, Literature, Theology. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Brueggemann, Walter. The Psalms and the Life of Faith. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Burge, David K. “A Sub-Christian Epistle? Appreciating 2 Peter as an Anti-Sophistic Polemic.” JSNT 44.2 (2021), 310–32.Google Scholar
Callan, Terrance. “Reading the Earliest Copies of 2 Peter.” Biblica 93.3 (2012): 427–50.Google Scholar
Callan, Terrence. “The Second Letter of Peter, Josephus and Gnosticism.” In 2 Peter and the Apocalypse of Peter: Towards a New Perspective. Edited by Frey, Jörg, Dulk, Matthijs, and van der Watt, Jan, 128–44. Leiden: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Callan, Terrence. “The Style of the Second Letter of Peter.” Biblica 84 (2003): 202–24.Google Scholar
Calvin, John. Commentaries on the Catholic Epistles. Edinburgh: The Calvin Translation Society, 1855.Google Scholar
Campbell, Constantine R. Paul and Union with Christ: An Exegetical and Theological Study. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2012.Google Scholar
Campbell, Constantine R. Verbal Aspect, the Indicative Mood, and Narrative: Soundings in the Greek of the New Testament. New York: Peter Lang, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Douglas A. Framing Paul: An Epistolary Biography. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2014.Google Scholar
Campbell, Douglas A. The Deliverance of God: An Apocalyptic Rereading of Justification in Paul. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar
Campbell, Douglas A. The Quest for Paul’s Gospel: A Suggested Strategy. New York: T&T Clark, 2005.Google Scholar
Chapman, Stephen B. “Reclaiming Inspiration for the Bible.” In Canon and Biblical Interpretation. Edited by Bartholomew, Craig et al., 167–206. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2006.Google Scholar
Charles, J. Daryl. “The Language and Logic of Virtue in 2 Peter 1:5–7.” BBR 8 (1998): 55–73.Google Scholar
Charles, J. Daryl. Virtue Amidst Vice: The Catalog of Virtues in 2 Peter 1, JSNTSup, 150. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Chang, Andrew D. “Second Peter 2:1 and the Extent of the Atonement.” BibSac 142 (1985): 52–63.Google Scholar
Chatraw, Joshua D., and Carson, Jack. Surprised by Doubt: How Disillusionment Can Invite Us into Deeper Faith. Grand Rapids: Brazos Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Cokayne, Karen. Experiencing Old Age in Ancient Rome. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, Oliver D. Participation and Atonement: An Analytic and Constructive Account. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2022.Google Scholar
Crisp, Oliver D., Arcadi, James M., and Wessling, Jordan, eds. Love, Divine and Human: Contemporary Essays in Systematic and Philosophical Theology. New York: Bloomsbury, 2019.Google Scholar
Crump, David. Feeling Like God: A Spiritual Journey to Emotional Wholeness. Toronto: Clements, 2005.Google Scholar
Davids, Peter H. The Letters of 2 Peter and Jude. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davids, Peter H. II Peter and Jude: A Handbook on the Greek Text. Waco: Baylor University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Davids, Peter H. A Theology of James, Peter, and Jude, Biblical Theology of the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2014.Google Scholar
Davids, Peter H. “What Glasses Are You Wearing? Reading Hebrew Narratives through Second Temple Lenses.” JETS 55.4 (2012): 763–71.Google Scholar
deSilva, David A. An Introduction to the New Testament: Contexts, Methods, and Ministry Formation. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2004.Google Scholar
deSilva, David A. “Testament of Moses.” In Dictionary of New Testament Background. Edited by Evans, Craig A. and Porter, Stanley E., 1192–99. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Dockery, David. Christian Scripture: An Evangelical Perspective on Inspiration, Authority, and Interpretation. Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 1995.Google Scholar
Dodd, C. H. The Apostolic Preaching and Its Developments. New York: Harper & Row, 1964.Google Scholar
Doering, Lutz. Ancient Jewish Letters and the Beginnings of Christian Epistolography. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donelson, Lewis R. I & II Peter and Jude, New Testament Library. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Dunn, James D. G. The Partings of the Ways: Between Christianity and Judaism and Their Significance for the Character of Christianity. Norwich: SCM Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Emerson, Matthew Y. “Does God Own a Death Star? The Destruction of the Cosmos in 2 Peter 3:l–13.” SWJT 57.2 (2015): 281–93.Google Scholar
Estelle, Bryan D. Echoes of Exodus: Tracing a Biblical Motif. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2018.Google Scholar
EstradaIII, Rodolfo Gavan. “Blaspheming Angels: The Presence of Magicians in Jude 8–10.” JETS 63.4 (2020): 739–58.Google Scholar
Evans, C. Stephen. “Canonicity, Apostolicity, and Biblical Authority.” In Canon and Biblical Interpretation. Edited by Bartholomew, Craig et al., 146–66. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2006.Google Scholar
Fanning, Buist M. Verbal Aspect in New Testament Greek. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farkasfalvy, Denis. Inspiration & Interpretation: A Theological Introduction to Sacred Scripture Washington DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Paul D. “The Meaning of Inerrancy.” In Inerrancy. Edited by Geisler, Norman L., 267–304. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1980.Google Scholar
Feldmeier, Reinhard. The First Letter of Peter: A Commentary on the Greek Text. Waco: Baylor University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Ferda, Tucker S. Jesus and His Promised Second Coming: Jewish Eschatology and Christian Origins. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2024.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, John T. “Virtue/Vice Lists.” In The Anchor Bible Dictionary. Edited by Freedman, David Noel, 857–59. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Foster, Paul. “Does the Apocalypse of Peter Help to Determine the Date of 2 Peter?” In 2 Peter and the Apocalypse of Peter: Towards a New Perspective. Edited by Frey, Jörg, Dulk, Matthijs, and van der Watt, Jan, 217–60. Leiden: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Frame, John M. The Doctrine of the Word of God, A Theology of Lordship. Vol. 4. Philipsburg: P&R, 2010.Google Scholar
Fredericksen, Paula. When Christians Were Jews: The First Generation. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fresch, Christopher J. “2 Peter.” In Discourse Analysis of the New Testament Writings. Edited by Scacewater, Todd A., 621–50. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Frey, Jörg. The Letter of Jude and the Second Letter of Peter: A Theological Commentary. Waco: Baylor University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Frey, Jörg, den Dulk, Matthijs, and van der Watt, Jan G., eds. 2 Peter and the Apocalypse of Peter: Towards a New Perspective. Leiden: Brill, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Jörg. “Second Peter in New Perspective.” In 2 Peter and the Apocalypse of Peter: Towards a New Perspective. Edited by Frey, Jörg, Dulk, Matthijs, and van der Watt, Jan, 7–74. Leiden: Brill, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frye, Michael. “Identifying a Summarizing Structure in 2 Peter 3:14–18a through Discourse Analysis.” Unpublished paper submitted to PhD Seminar. Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA, May 10, 2024.Google Scholar
Fuhr, Richard Alan Jr., and Yates, Gary E.. The Message of the Twelve: Hearing the Voice of the Minor Prophets. Nashville: B&H, 2016.Google Scholar
Galek, Kathleen, et al. “Religious Doubt and Mental Health Across the Lifespan.” Journal of Adult Development 14.1–2 (June 2007): 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallaher, Brandon, and Konstantinovsky, Julia S.. “Divine Action in Christ: The Christocentric and Trinitarian Nature of Human Cooperation with God.” In When the Son of Man Didn’t Come: A Constructive Proposal on the Delay of the Parousia. Edited by Hays, Christopher M., 147–74. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Gathercole, Simon J. The Preexistent Son: Recovering the Christologies of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2006.Google Scholar
Gilmour, Michael J. “Reflections on the Authorship of 2 Peter.” EQ 73.4 (2001): 291–309.Google Scholar
Gilmour, Michael J. The Significance of Parallels Between 2 Peter and Other Early Christian Literature, Academia Biblica 10. Atlanta; Leiden: SBL; Brill, 2002.Google Scholar
Gladd, Benjamin L., and Harmon, Matthew S.. Making All Things New: Inaugurated Eschatology for the Life of the Church. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2016.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Jonah, and Rayner, Jeremy. “The Politics of Identity in Late Modern Society.” Theory and Society 23.3 (1994): 367–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordley, Matthew. New Testament Christological Hymns: Exploring Texts, Contexts, and Significance. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Gorman, Michael J. Becoming the Gospel: Paul, Participation, and Mission. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2015.Google Scholar
Gorman, Michael J. Inhabiting the Cruciform God: Kenosis, Justification, and Theosis in Paul’s Narrative Soteriology. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar
Gorman, Michael J. Participating in Christ: Explorations in Paul’s Theology and Spirituality. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2019.Google Scholar
Graves, Michael. The Inspiration and Interpretation of Scripture: What the Early Church Can Teach Us. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2014.Google Scholar
Green, Joel B. “Narrating the Gospel in 1 and 2 Peter.” Interpretation 60.3 (2006): 262–77.Google Scholar
Green, Joel B., and Palmer, Stuart L.. In Search of The Soul: Four Views of The Mind-body Problem. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2005.Google Scholar
Grünstäudl, Wolfgang. “‘On Slavery’ A Possible Herrenwort in 2 Pet. 2:19.” Novum Testam 57 (2015): 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünstäudl, Wolfgang. Petrus Alexandrinus: Studien zum historischen und theologischen Ort des Zweiten Petrusbriefes, WUNT 2.315. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013.Google Scholar
Guinness, Os. God in the Dark: The Assurance of Faith Beyond a Shadow of Doubt. Wheaton: Crossway Books, 1996.Google Scholar
Guthrie, Donald. New Testament Introduction. 4th ed. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 1990.Google Scholar
Hafemann, Scott. “‘Noah, the Preacher of (God’s) Righteousness’: The Argument from Scripture in 2 Peter 2:5 and 9.” CBQ 76 (2014): 306–20.Google Scholar
Hagner, Donald A. The New Testament: A Historical and Theological Introduction. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2012.Google Scholar
Harrill, J. Albert. “Slavery.” In Dictionary of New Testament Background. Edited by Evans, Craig A. and Porter, Stanley E., 1124–27. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2000.Google Scholar
Harrington, Hannah K. “Sin.” In Eerdmans Dictionary of Early Judaism. Edited by Collins, John J. and Harlow, Daniel C., 1230–31. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2010.Google Scholar
Hart, David J. H. Christianity: A New Look at Ancient Wisdom. Kelowna, BC: Wood Lake, 2005.Google Scholar
Hays, Christopher M. “The Delay of the Parousia: A Traditional and Historical-Critical Reading of Scripture: Part 2.” In When the Son of Man Didn’t Come: A Constructive Proposal on the Delay of the Parousia. Edited by Hays, Christopher M., 79–108. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, Christopher M., ed. When the Son of Man Didn’t Come: A Constructive Proposal on the Delay of the Parousia. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, Richard B. The Faith of Jesus Christ: The Narrative Substructure of Gal. 3:1–4:11. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002.Google Scholar
Heide, Gale Z. “What Is New about the New Heaven and the New Earth? A Theology of Creation from Revelation 21 and 2 Peter 3.” JETS 40.1 (1997): 37–56.Google Scholar
Heiser, Michael S. The Unseen Realm: Recovering the Supernatural Worldview of the Bible. Bellingham: Lexham Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Hellerman, Joseph H. Jesus and the People of God: Reconfiguring Ethnic Identity, New Testament Monographs. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Hellerman, Joseph H. When the Church Was a Family: Recapturing Jesus’ Vision for Authentic Christian Community. Nashville: B&H, 2009.Google Scholar
Henry, Carl H. F. “Canonical Theology: An Evangelical Appraisal.” Scottish Bulletin of Evangelical Theology 8 (1990): 76–108.Google Scholar
Hoag, Gary G. Wealth in Ancient Ephesus and the First Letter to Timothy: Fresh Insights from Ephesiaca by Xenophon of Ephesus. University Park: Penn State University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Hunsberger, Bruce, and Susan Alisat, S. Pancer, Mark, and Pratt, Michael W.. “Religious Fundamentalism and Religious Doubts: Content, Connections and Complexity of Thinking.” International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 6:3 (July 1996): 201–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurtado, Larry W. Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Matthew D. “Noah, the Eighth Proclaimer of Righteousness: Understanding 2 Peter 2.5 in Light of Genesis 4.26.” JSNT 37.4 (2015): 458–69.Google Scholar
Johnson, Luke T. “The New Testament’s Anti-Jewish Slander and the Conventions of Ancient Polemic.” SBL 108.3 (1989): 419–41.Google Scholar
Judd, Andrew. Modern Genre Theory: An Introduction for Biblical Studies. HarperCollins Christian, 2024.Google Scholar
Kӓrkkӓinen, Veli-Matti. Trinity and Revelation, A Constructive Christian Theology for the Pluralist World. Vol. 2. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2014.Google Scholar
Kӓsemann, Ernst. “An Apologia for Primitive Christian Eschatology.” In Essays on New Testament Themes. Translated by W. J. Montague, 169–95. SBT 41. London: SCM, 1964.Google Scholar
Keating, James, and White, Thomas Joseph. Divine Impassibility and the Mystery of Human Suffering. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar
Keener, Craig S. “Adultery, Divorce.” In Dictionary of New Testament Background. Edited by Evans, Craig A. and Porter, Stanley E., 6–8. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2000.Google Scholar
Keener, Craig S. The Gospel of Matthew: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. N. D. The Epistles of Peter and of Jude, BNTC. London, Adam and Charles Black Limited, 1969.Google Scholar
Knopf, Rudolf. Die Briefe Petri und Juda, Kritisch-exegetischer Kommentar über das Neue Testament 12. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1912.Google Scholar
Koester, Craig R. “The Savior of the World (John 4:42).” Journal of Biblical Literature, 109 (1990): 665–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, Neal, Ingersoll-Dayton, Berit, Ellison, Christopher G., and Wulff, Keith M.. “Aging, Religious Doubt, and Psychological Well-Being.” Gerontologist 39.5 (1999): 525–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruger, Michael J. “2 Peter 3:2, the Apostolate, and a Bi-Covenantal Canon.” JETS 63.1 (2020): 5–24.Google Scholar
Kugler, Robert A. “Testaments.” In The Eerdman’s Dictionary of Early Judaism. Edited by Collins, John J. and Harlow, Daniel C., 1295–97. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2010.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Karl. “2 Peter 3:1–13.” Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 60.3 (2006): 310–12.Google Scholar
Kümmel, Werner George. Introduction to the New Testament. Rev. ed. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Ladd, George Eldon. The Presence of the Future: The Eschatology of Biblical Realism. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1974.Google Scholar
Laird, Benjamin P. Creating the Canon: Composition, Controversy, and the Authority of the New Testament. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2023.Google Scholar
Laird, Benjamin P. The Pauline Corpus in Early Christianity: Its Formation, Publication, and Circulation. Peabody: Hendrickson Academic, 2022.Google Scholar
Levenson, Jon D. The Love of God: Divine Gift, Human Gratitude, and Mutual Faithfulness in Judaism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Henry George and Scott, Robert. A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1940.Google Scholar
Lövestam, Evald. “Eschatologie und Tradition im 2 Petrusbrief.” In The New Testament Age: Essays in Honor of Bo Reicke. Vol. 2. Edited by Weinrich, William C., 287–300. Macon: Mercer University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Louw, Johannes P., and Nida, Eugene Albert. Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: Based on Semantic Domains. New York: United Bible Societies, 1996.Google Scholar
Lyons, Kelly. “Spotify Wrapped 2023: Top Songs, Artists, Podcasts and Listening Trends.” www.newsweek.com/spotify-wrapped-2023-listening-trends-1848048.Google Scholar
Lyons, William John. Canon and Exegesis: Canonical Praxis and the Sodom Narrative. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Machiela, Daniel A. “Flood.” In Eerdman’s Dictionary of Early Judaism. Edited by Collins, John. C. and Harlow, Daniel C., 645–46. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2010.Google Scholar
Makujina, John. “The ‘Trouble’ with Lot in 2 Peter: Locating Peter’s Source for Lot’s Torment.” Westminster Theological Journal 60.2 (1998): 255–69.Google Scholar
Malina, Bruce J. The New Testament World: Insights from Cultural Anthropology. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Marshall, I. Howard. New Testament Theology: Many Witnesses, One Gospel. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2004.Google Scholar
Mathews, Mark D. “The Genre of 2 Peter: A Comparison with Jewish and Early Christian Testaments.” Bulletin of Biblical Research 21.1 (2011): 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathewson, David L., and Emig, Elodi Ballantine. Intermediate Greek Grammar: Syntax of Students of the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2016.Google Scholar
Mathewson, David L. “Verbal Aspect in Imperatival Constructions in Pauline Ethical Injunctions.” Filología Neotestamentaria 9.17 (1996): 21–35.Google Scholar
Matz, Robert J., and Thornhill, A. Chadwick. Divine Impassibility: Four Views of God’s Emotions and Suffering. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2019.Google Scholar
Mayor, Joseph B. The Epistle of St. Jude and the Second Epistle of St. Peter: Greek Text with Introductions, Notes and Comments. Minneapolis: Klock and Klock, 1978.Google Scholar
McCormack, Bruce L. Justification in Perspective: Historical Developments and Contemporary Challenges. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2006.Google Scholar
McDowell, Sean. The Fate of the Apostles: Examining the Martyrdom Accounts of the Closest Followers of Jesus. New York: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar
McKnight, Scot. Kingdom Conspiracy: Returning to the Radical Mission of the Local Church. Grand Rapids: Brazos Press, 2016.Google Scholar
McKnight, Scot. The King Jesus Gospel: The Original Good News Revisited. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2016.Google Scholar
McKnight, Scot, and Modica, Joseph B.. Jesus is Lord, Caesar is Not: Evaluation Empire in New Testament Studies. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2013.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Hugh. “Americans Are Spending More Time Listening to Music Than Ever Before.” Forbes. www.forbes.com/sites/hughmcintyre/2017/11/09/americans-are-spending-more-time-listening-to-music-than-ever-before/?sh=471de9c92f7f.Google Scholar
Meier, John P. “Forming the Canon on the Edge of the Canon: 2 Peter 3:8–18.” Mid-Stream, 38 (1999): 65–70.Google Scholar
Merkle, Benjamin L. Exegetical Gems from Biblical Greek: A Refreshing Guide to Grammar and Interpretation. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2019.Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce M. “Literary Forgeries and Canonical Pseudepigrapha.” JBL 92 (1972): 5–12.Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce M. A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament. 2nd ed. London: United Bible Societies, 1994.Google Scholar
Middleton, J. Richard A New Heaven and a New Earth: Reclaiming Biblical Eschatology. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2014.Google Scholar
Miller, James C. “The Sociological Category of ‘Collective Identity’ and Its Implications for Understanding Second Peter.” In Reading Second Peter with New Eyes: Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of Second Peter. Edited by Webb, Robert L. and Watson, Duane F., 147–78. Bloomsbury, 2010.Google Scholar
Miszcyński, Damian. “Justice for Animals According to Plutarch.” Mare Nostrom 10.1 (2019): 54–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moltmann, Jürgen. The Crucified God: The Cross of Christ as the Foundation and Criticism of Christian Theology. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1993.Google Scholar
Morrison, John Douglas. Has God Said? Scripture, the Word of God, and the Crisis of Theological Authority. Eugene: Pickwick, 2006.Google Scholar
Morrison, John D. “Scripture as Word of God: Evangelical Assumption or Evangelical Question?” Trinity Journal 20:2 (1999): 165–90.Google Scholar
Moses, A. D. A. Matthew’s Transfiguration Story and Jewish-Christian Controversy, JSNT Supp 122. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Muck, Johannes. “Discours d’Adieu dans le Nouveau Testament et dans la Literature Biblique.” In Aux Sources de la Tradition Chrétienne Mélanges Offerts a M. Maurice Goguel a l’Occasion de Son Soixante-Dixième Anniversaire. Paris: Neuchâtel Delachaux & Niestlé, 1950.Google Scholar
Nellas, Panayiotis. Deification in Christ: Orthodox Perspectives on the Nature of the Human Person. Yonkers: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Neyrey, Jerome H. “The Apologetic Use of the Transfiguration in 2 Peter 1:16–21.” CBQ 42.4 (1980): 504–19.Google Scholar
Neyrey, Jerome H. “The Form and Background of the Polemic in 2 Peter.” JBL 99.3 (1980): 407–31.Google Scholar
Nickelsburg, George W. E. “Apocalyptic and Myth in 1 Enoch 6–11.” JBL 96.3 (1977): 399–404.Google Scholar
Noble, Alan. Disruptive Witness: Speaking Truth in a Distracted Age. Downers Grove: IVP, 2018.Google Scholar
Noort, Ed, and Tigchelaar, Eibert, eds. Sodom’s Sin: Genesis 18–19 and Its Interpretations. Leiden: Brill, 2021.Google Scholar
Nouwen, Henri J. M. Finding My Way Home: Pathways to Life and the Spirit. New York: Crossroad, 2001.Google Scholar
O’Mathúna, D. P. “Divination, Magic.” In Dictionary of the Old Testament: Pentateuch. Edited by Desmond Alexander, T. and Baker, David W., 457–68. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2002.Google Scholar
Oropeza, B. J. Churches under Siege of Persecution and Assimilation: Apostasy in the New Testament Communities, Volume 3: The General Epistles and Revelation. Eugene: Wipf & Stock, 2012.Google Scholar
Perkins, Pheme. First and Second Peter, James, and Jude, Interpretation: A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Picirilli, Robert E. “Allusions to 2 Peter in the Apostolic Fathers.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 33 (1988): 57–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. Verbal Aspect in the Greek of the New Testament, with Reference to Tense and Mood. New York: Peter Lang, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Stanley E., and Pitts, Andrew W.. “τοῦτο πρῶτον γινώσκοντες ὅτι in 2 Peter 1:20 and Hellenistic Epistolary Convention.” JBL 127.1 (2008): 165–71.Google Scholar
Sir Ramsay, William Mitchell. The Cities of St. Paul: Their Influence on His Life and Thought. New York: A. C. Armstrong, 1908.Google Scholar
Reed, Annette Yoshiko. Fallen Angels and the History of Judaism and Christianity: The Reception of Enochic Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Annette Yoshiko, ed. Jewish-Christianity and the History of Judaism: Collected Essays. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reese, Ruth Anne. “Narrative Method and the Letter of Second Peter.” In Reading Second Peter with New Eyes: Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of Second Peter. Edited by Webb, Robert L. and Watson, Duane F., 119–46. Bloomsbury, 2010.Google Scholar
Reese, Ruth Anne. 2 Peter & Jude, The Two Horizons New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuschling, Wyndy Corbin. “The Means and End in 2 Peter 1:3–11: The Theological and Moral Significance of Theosis.” Journal of Theological Interpretation 8.2 (2014): 275–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, Earl J. Reading 1 Peter, Jude, and 2 Peter: A Literary and Theological Commentary. Macon: Smyth and Helwys Publishing, 2013.Google Scholar
Richards, E. Randolph. Paul and First-Century Letter Writing: Secretaries, Composition and Collection. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2004.Google Scholar
Richards, E. Randolph, and Boyle, Kevin J.. “Did the Ancients Know the Testaments Were Pseudepigraphic? Implications for 2 Peter.” Bulletin for Biblical Research 30.3 (2020): 403–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodogno, Raffaele. “Shame, Guilt, and Punishment.” Law and Philosophy 28 (2009): 429–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rösel, Martin. “The Reading and Translation of the Divine Name in the Masoretic Tradition and the Greek Pentateuch.” JSOT 31 (2007): 411–28.Google Scholar
Rothwell, Jonathan. “Teens Spend Average of 4.8 Hours on Social Media Per Day.” https://news.gallup.com/poll/512576/teens-spend-average-hours-social-media-per-day.aspx.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. Kavin. Early Narrative Christology: The Lord in the Gospel of Luke. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runge, Steven E. Discourse Grammar of the Greek New Testament: A Practical Introduction for Teaching and Exegesis. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2010.Google Scholar
Runge, Steve E., and Fresch, Christopher J., eds. The Greek Verb Revisited: A Fresh Approach for Biblical Exegesis. Bellingham: Lexham Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Russell, Norman. The Doctrine of Deification in the Greek Patristic Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandy, Brent. Plowshares and Pruning Hooks: Rethinking the Language of Biblical Prophecy and Apocalyptic. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2002.Google Scholar
Schreiner, Patrick. The Kingdom of God and the Glory of the Cross, Short Studies in Biblical Theology. Wheaton: Crossway, 2018.Google Scholar
Schreiner, Patrick. The Transfiguration of Christ: An Exegetical and Theological Reading. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2024.Google Scholar
Schreiner, Thomas R. 1 & 2 Peter and Jude, Christian Standard Commentary. Nashville: Holman, 2020.Google Scholar
Schreiner, Thomas R. Faith Alone: The Doctrine of Justification and Why It Still Matters. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2015.Google Scholar
Schooping, Joshua. A Manual of Theosis: Orthodox Christian Instruction on the Theory and Practice of Stillness, Watchfulness, and Ceaseless Prayer. Olyphant: St. Theophan the Recluse Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Leonhard. Sklaverei in der Antike: Alltag und Schicksal der Unfreien. Munich: C. H. Beck, 2001.Google Scholar
Seely, Kelly Adair. A Study of Petrine Christology from Key Texts in 2 Peter. Eugene: Wipf & Stock 2021.Google Scholar
Skaggs, Rebecca. “The Spirit in 1 Peter, 2 Peter, and Jude: Transformation and Transcendence.” Pneuma 43 (2021): 538–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, Moisés, ed. New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology and Exegesis. Vol. 2. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2014.Google Scholar
Skarsaune, Oskar, and Hvalvik, Reidar, eds., Jewish Believers in Jesus: The Early Centuries. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2017.Google Scholar
Smith, Terence V. Petrine Controversies in Early Christian: Attitudes Toward Peter in Christian Writings of the First Two Centuries, WUNT 2.15. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1985.Google Scholar
Starr, J. M. Sharers in the Divine Nature: 2 Peter 1:4 in Its Hellenistic Context, Coniectanea biblica: New Testament Series. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell, 2000.Google Scholar
Steinmann, Andrew E. Genesis: An Introduction and Commentary, TOTC. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2019.Google Scholar
Streett, R. Alan. Subversive Meals: An Analysis of the Lord’s Supper Under Roman Domination During the First Century. Eugene: Wipf & Stock, 2013.Google Scholar
Strine, C. A. “Reconceiving Prophecy: Activation, Not Prognostication.” In When the Son of Man Didn’t Come: A Constructive Proposal on the Delay of the Parousia. Edited by Hays, Christopher M., 39–58. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylva, Dennis D. “A Unified Field Picture of Second Peter 1.3–15: Making Rhetorical Sense Out of Individual Images.” In Reading Second Peter with New Eyes: Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of Second Peter. Edited by Webb, Robert L. and Watson, Duane F., 91–118. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2010.Google Scholar
Teslina, Margaryta. “‘Apostles’ in 2 Peter 3.2: Literal Predecessors in Faith or Literary Records of their Witness?” JSNT 44.1 (2021): 170–93.Google Scholar
Thiede, Carsten Peter. “A Pagan Reader of 2 Peter: Cosmic Conflagration in 2 Peter 3 and the Octavius of Minucius Feux.” JSNT 26 (1986): 79–96.Google Scholar
Thiselton, Anthony C. The Two Horizons: New Testament Hermeneutics and Philosophical Description with Special Reference to Heidegger, Bultmann, Gadamer, and Wittgenstein. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1980.Google Scholar
Thomson, Christopher J. “What Is Aspect? Contrasting Definitions in General Linguistics and New Testament Studies.” In The Greek Verb Revisited: A Fresh Approach for Biblical Exegesis. Edited by Runge, Steven E. and Fresch, Christopher J., 13–80. Bellingham: Lexham Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Thornhill, A. Chadwick. The Chosen People: Election, Paul, and Second Temple Judaism. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2013.Google Scholar
Thornhill, A. Chadwick. “Does the Spirit Have a Story? A Narrative Theology of the Holy Spirit.” Journal of Theological Interpretation 14.2 (2020): 246–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, A. Chadwick. “Election and Predestination.” In The Dictionary of Paul and His Letters: A Compendium of Contemporary Biblical Scholarship. Edited by Cohick, Lynn, Gupta, Nijay, and McKnight, Scot. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2022.Google Scholar
Thornhill, A. Chadwick. “Emotional Doubt and Divine Hiddenness.” Eleutheria 1.2 (2014): 1–18.Google Scholar
Thurén, Lauri. “Style Never Goes out of Fashion: 2 Peter Re-evaluated.” In Rhetoric, Scripture and Theology: Essays from the 1994 Pretoria Conference. Edited by Porter, S. E. and Olbricht, T. H., 329–47. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Tooth, Sydney. Suddenness and Signs: The Eschatologies of 1 and 2 Thessalonians. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trapp, Michael, ed. Greek and Latin Letters: An Anthology with Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
van der Kold, Bessel. The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. London: Penguin Books, 2015.Google Scholar
Vanhoozer, Kevin J. The Drama of Doctrine: A Canonical Linguistic Approach to Christian Doctrine. Philadelphia: Westminster John Knox Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Vasaly, Ann. “Cicero’s Early Speeches.” In Brill’s Companion to Cicero. Edited by May, James M., 71–111. Leiden: Brill, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, Robert W. “The Canonical Function of 2 Peter.” Biblical Interpretation 9.1 (2001): 64–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, John H. The Lost World of Genesis One: Ancient Cosmology and the Origins Debate. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Walton, John H. The Lost World of Scripture: Ancient Literary Culture and Biblical Authority. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2013.Google Scholar
Watson, Duane F., and Callan, Terrance D.. First and Second Peter, PCNT. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2012.Google Scholar
Watson, Duane Frederick. Invention, Arrangement, and Style: Rhetorical Criticism of Jude and 2 Peter, SBL Dissertation Series, 104. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Weima, Jeffrey A. D. Paul the Ancient Letter Writer: An Introduction to Epistolary Analysis. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2016.Google Scholar
Wenham, David. “Being ‘Found’ on the Last Day: New Light on 2 Peter 3.10 and 2 Corinthians 5.3.” NTS 33 (1987): 477–79.Google Scholar
Werse, Nicholas R. “Second Temple Jewish Literary Traditions in 2 Peter.” CBQ 78 (2016): 111–30.Google Scholar
Wessling, Jordan. Love Divine: A Systematic Account of God’s Love for Humanity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Thomas H. Jesus and the Quest for Meaning: Entering Theology. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Westerholm, Stephen. Justification Reconsidered: Rethinking a Pauline Theme. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2013.Google Scholar
White, Carolinne. The Correspondence (394–419) between Jerome and Augustine of Hippo. Lewiston: Mellen, 1990.Google Scholar
White, John. “The Greek Documentary Letter Tradition Third Century BCE to Third Century CE.” Semeia 22 (1981): 89–106.Google Scholar
Wilder, Jim. Renovated; God, Dallas Willard, and the Church That Transforms. Colorado Springs: NavPress, 2020.Google Scholar
Wilder, Terry L. Pseudonymity, the New Testament, and Deception: An Inquiry into Intention and Reception. Lanham: University Press of America, 2004.Google Scholar
Wilder, Terry L. “Revisiting Pseudonymity, the New Testament, and the Noble Lie.” JBTM 19.2 (2022): 367–80.Google Scholar
Willard, Dallas. Life Without Lack: Living in the Fullness of Psalm 23. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2018.Google Scholar
Williams, Travis B. “The Amanuensis Hypothesis in New Testament Scholarship: Its Origin, Evidential Basis, and Application.” CBR 22.1 (2023): 7–82.Google Scholar
Williams, Travis B. “Confirming Scripture through Eyewitness Testimony (2 Peter 1.19a): Resolving a Crux Interpretum.” JSNT 43.4 (2021): 605–24.Google Scholar
Windisch, Hans. Die Katholischen Briefe. 3rd ed., Handbuch zum Neuen Testament 15. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1951.Google Scholar
Winters, Clifford D. “A Strange Death: Cosmic Conflagration as Conceptual Metaphor in 2 Peter 3:6–13.” Conversations with the Biblical World 33 (2013): 147–62.Google Scholar
Witherington, Ben III. Letters for Hellenized Christians. Vol. II. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2007.Google Scholar
Witherington, Ben III. The Letters to Philemon, the Colossians, and the Ephesians: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on the Captivity Epistles. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2007.Google Scholar
Witherington, Ben III, and Myers, Jason A.. New Testament Rhetoric. 2nd ed. Eugene: Cascade Books, 2022.Google Scholar
Wolters, Al. “Worldview and Textual Criticism in 2 Peter 3:10.” Westminster Theological Journal 49.2 (1987): 405–13.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. Divine Discourse: Philosophical Reflections on the Claim that God Speaks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, N. T. How God Became King: Getting to the Heart of the Gospels. New York: HarperOne, 2012.Google Scholar
Wright, N. T. Justification: God’s Plan and Paul’s Vision. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2009.Google Scholar
Wright, N. T. The New Testament and the People of God, Christian Origins and the Question of God. Vol. 1. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Wright, N. T. Surprised by Hope: Rethinking Heaven, the Resurrection, and the Mission of the Church. New York: HarperOne, 2008.Google Scholar
Wright, N. T., and Bird, Michael, The New Testament in Its World: An Introduction to the History, Literature, and Theology of the First Christians. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2019.Google Scholar
Max, Zerwick, and Grosvenor, Mary. Grammatical Analysis of the Greek New Testament. Vol. 2, Epistles-Apocalypse. Rome: Biblical Institute Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Inaccessible, or known limited accessibility
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The PDF of this book is known to have missing or limited accessibility features.
We may be reviewing its accessibility for future improvement, but final compliance is
not yet assured and may be subject to legal exceptions. If you have any questions,
please contact
accessibility@cambridge.org.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visualised data also available as non-graphical data
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.