Within-region geographical variation in Canadian Englishes has rarely been investigated on a large scale. This is at least in part due to claims of Canadian “Englishes” being largely geographically homogeneous (Chambers, 2004; Boberg, 2010; Denis, 2020), despite evidence of regional variation (Dollinger, 2019). Here, we build on older literature that documented regional variation in English spoken in British Columbia (BC). We focus on two regions in BC—the Okanagan and the Lower Mainland—examining four phonological patterns: pre-velar raising of kit, dress, and trap, and Canadian Raising of price. Using Generalized Additive Mixed Models, we find regional differences in vowel pronunciation patterns for pre-velar raising of the examined front vowels and for Canadian Raising of price. Both regions engage in Canadian Raising and pre-velar raising. From that lens, the regions are homogeneous. However, the patterns are produced in regionally specific ways, providing further evidence that regional variation exists within smaller geographical areas in Canadian English. Overall, this challenges the claims of homogeneity for English spoken in Canada and more generally invites an interrogation of what homogeneity means.

We present and evaluate the map-based accent-recognition task, in which listeners place speech fragments of regionally accented Netherlandic Standard Dutch on a map in a browser-based experiment. On the basis of 15,780 accent placements (from 1,578 participants), we demonstrate that this task successfully elicits listener associations between speech and space, which are mediated by listeners’ sociolinguistic representations. We subsequently assess the task’s validity by comparing the listeners’ map-based associations with objective dialectological distances: results show a significant correlation between production and perception and hence establish convergent validity. Finally, we use a hierarchical cluster analysis to map out listeners’ perceptual isoglosses. These reveal that the accent placements largely clustered along the province boundaries, but with dialectologically motivated deviations and subcategorizations. We discuss methodological implications for perceptual dialectology and sociolinguistic implications for Dutch.