The pervasive integration of digital media into daily life is reshaping how individuals encounter and internalize harmful contents. Unrestricted access exposes students to emotionally disruptive materials, including depictions of violence, substance use, and harassment, raising concerns about its impact on well-being. This study examines a serial mediation model linking antisocial media exposure to subjective well-being (SWB) through school-based victimization as sequential pathways. Using data from 326 high school students in Nigeria, we applied partial least squares structural equation modeling to test hypothesized relationships. Results indicate that antisocial media exposure was not directly associated with SWB but significantly predicted experiences of teacher and peer victimization. Peer victimization mediated the relationship between antisocial media exposure and SWB (β = −0.023, 95% CI: [−0.054, −0.004], p < 0.05). Furthermore, antisocial media exposure increased the likelihood of teacher victimization, which facilitated peer victimization, ultimately compromising SWB (β = −0.030, 95% CI: [−0.058, −0.011], p < 0.05). Effects varied by gender and academic level, underscoring intersectional risks linked to media exposure. Findings highlight the need for targeted interventions addressing both teacher and peer victimization in resource-constrained educational contexts.

Both the family and school environments influence adolescents’ violence, but there is little research focusing simultaneously on the two contexts. This study analyzed the role of positive family and classroom environments as protective factors for adolescents’ violence against authority (parent abuse and teacher abuse) and the relations between antisocial behavior and child-to-parent violence or student-to-teacher violence. The sample comprised 687 Spanish students aged 12-16 years, who responded to the Family Environment Scale (FES) and the Classroom Environment Scale (CES). Structural Equation Modeling was used to test our model of violent behavior towards authority based on Catalano and Hawkins’ Social Developmental Model (1996). Perceived family cohesion and organization showed an inverse association with parent abuse, suggesting that a positive family environment was a protective factor for the development of violence against parents. Family and classroom environments had direct effects on adolescents’ violence against authority, and antisocial behavior showed a mediating effect in this relationship. The model accounted for 81% of the variance in violence against authority. As family environment was a better predictor of violence against authority than school environment, intervention efforts to reduce rates of adolescent violence should focus on helping parents to increase family cohesion and to manage conflictive relationships with their children.