To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Remote videoconference neuropsychological assessments offer opportunities that remain under-exploited. We aimed to evaluate teleneuropsychology (TeleNP)-suitable oral and digital versions of the Symbol Digit Modalities Task (SDMT) and Trail Making Test (TMT) – widely used measures of speed and attention – by comparing them to their written counterparts.
Methods:
Three-hundred and twenty-one Australian Epilepsy Project (AEP) adult participants with seizure disorders completed the written SDMT and TMT in-person. One-hundred and forty-four of these participants also completed the oral SDMT and TMT during a remote videoconference-based assessment while 177 completed a novel, examiner-administered digital SDMT analogous measure named Symbol Decoding and a novel digital TMT remotely via custom videoconference-based software.
Results:
Oral SDMT and digital Symbol Decoding strongly correlated with in-person written SDMT (r (133) = .77, p < .001 and r (126) = .76, p < .001, respectively). Oral TMT-B was only moderately associated (r (126) = .52, p < .001) with written TMT-B and, less strongly related to measures of sustained attention and spatial working memory than its written counterpart. Digital TMT better reproduced the written test’s properties with improved association with written TMT-B (r (154) = .71, p < .001).
Conclusions:
Oral SDMT and digital Symbol Decoding are strongly correlated with in-person written SDMT. The digital TMT better captures the cognitive demands and performance characteristics of the in-person written form than does oral TMT. Videoconference-integrated digital tasks offer increased standardization and automation in administration and scoring and the potential for rich metadata, making them an attractive area for further development.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.