To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This study investigated the dose difference (DD) in the surrounding dose area using the real-time motion tracking (RTMT) system in tomotherapy.
Method:
Seven stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy treatment plans with a single lesion were used for the investigations. Each treatment plan was evaluated for the Gamma passing rate (GPR) analysis in a static target motion using the ArcCHECK® phantom. Subsequently, each plan was matched with 8 clinical respiratory cycles to simulate moving target motion. The DD was calculated through point-to-point comparison and expressed as the frequency of the DD levels. The DD frequency was analysed for significant correlations with the target travelling distance, target size and respiratory frequency.
Result:
The GPR for criteria of 3%/2mm and 3%/3mm revealed values of 97·8 ± 1·9% and 99·5 ± 0·6%, respectively, for static motion. The highest frequency of DD was in the 5 – 10% range. A significant correlation was found between the target travelling distance and the frequency of percent DD at the 2·0 – 3·0% and 10·0 – 15·0% levels, as well as between target size and the frequency of percent DD at the 0·0 – 4·0% and 10·0 – 25·0% levels. Finally, no significant correlation was found between the frequency of percent DD and respiratory frequency.
Conclusion:
RTMT introduced the DD in the surrounding treatment area. The DD was found to be up to 15·0% at 119·5 mm (water-equivalent distance) from the phantom centre. The DD was varied depending on the target travelling distance and size, but it did not depend on the respiratory frequency.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.