We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Women with reproductive difficulties often feel stigmatized and isolated. Information concerning their specific experience can help plan psychosocial interventions.
Objectives
The study aims to analyze reproductive difficulties representations in women with different coping orientations.
Methods
Participants: 48 women (aged 24-43) from support groups arranged by the “You Are Not Alone” non-profit organization for women with reproductive issues. Based on the questionnaire “Types of Orientations in Difficult Situation”, participants were divided into three groups: approach coping (N=16), avoidance coping (N=9), ambivalent coping (N=23). Content analysis was conducted based on stories about reproduction difficulties experiences.
Results
Table 1
Groups
Categories
Approach coping
Ambivalent coping
Avoidance coping
1.Emotions
Negative emotions
31%
43%
Hope
31%
Mobilization to solve the problem
48%
Severe emotional state
9%
67%
No emotion
38%
33%
2.Goals
Birth of a child
81%
61%
44%
Acceptance/inner harmony
13%
26%
Understanding the cause of difficulties
7%
13%
Maintaining the integrity of the body
56%
3.Worst-case scenario
No child
56%
70%
33%
Illness/depression/insanity
13%
44%
Own death
13%
4%
22%
Denial of the possibility of the worst-case scenario
19%
9%
4.Best-case scenario
Having a child
100%
91%
67%
Accepting infertility
6%
Improving own health
33%
Objective indicator: perinatal losses
6%
27%
14%
Conclusions
We identified three types of representation of reproductive difficulties in women: approaching the goal of having a child; avoidance (fear of own death/illness/insanity or not having a child); ambivalent coping (alternating approach/avoidance). Funding: The study was funded by RFBR, project number 20-013-00838.
Disclosure
No significant relationships.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.