In this reflection, I seek to determine to what degree Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Collins et al. v. Yellen genuinely indicate a final legal sanctioning of the unitary theory, and thus precipitate a serious and significant disruption in both the political status quo and the stability of the constitutional system of separated powers. After a rigorous analysis of the trajectory of the court’s approach to the removal power, I find that there are four potential outcomes for the upcoming clashes between the Trump administration and several recently removed independent agency heads. Each of these potential outcomes have important constitutional implications, especially for the role of the Supreme Court in the Constitution’s separation-of-powers system. Understanding these constitutional implications will help to prepare political scientists to analyze and interpret future judicial and executive behavior.
