To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Decades of research have identified a strong association between heavy cannabis use and schizophrenia (SCZ), with evidence of correlated genetic factors. However, many studies on the genetic relationship between cannabis use and psychosis have lacked data on both phenotypes within the same individuals, creating challenges due to unmeasured confounding. We aimed to address this by using multimodal data from the All of Us Research Program, which contains genetic data as well as information on SCZ diagnosis and cannabis use.
Methods
We tested the association between cannabis use disorder (CUD) and SCZ polygenic scores (PGSs) with SCZ and heavy cannabis use. We tested models where both CUD and SCZ PGSs were included as joint predictors of heavy cannabis use and SCZ case status. We defined three sets of cases based on comorbidities: relaxed (assessing for only the primary condition), strict (excluding comorbidity), and dual-comorbidity.
Results
CUD and SCZ polygenic liability were independently associated with heavy cannabis use; the SCZ PGS effect was very modest. In contrast, both SCZ and CUD PGSs were independently associated with SCZ, with independent significant effects of CUD PGS. Polygenic liability to CUD was associated with SCZ in individuals without a documented history of cannabis use, suggesting widespread pleiotropy.
Conclusions
These findings underscore the need for comprehensive models that integrate genetic risk factors for heavy cannabis use to advance our understanding of SCZ etiology.
AVATAR therapy, a digitally supported intervention, utilises avatars to promote recovery in people who experience distressing auditory hallucinations. This approach was recently evaluated in a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing brief (AV-BRF) and extended (AV-EXT) forms of therapy with treatment as usual (TAU). There was evidence for the effectiveness of therapy, particularly for AV-EXT. However, value for money needs to be assessed.
Aims
To compare separately the cost utility of the brief and extended forms of AVATAR therapy with TAU.
Method
In a three-arm randomised controlled trial the use of health services was measured, and costs (2021/2022; pounds sterling) calculated from a health and social care perspective over a 28-week follow-up period. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs; derived from the 5-level version of the EuroQol 5-Dimension questionnaire) were combined with costs.
Results
AV-BRF resulted in extra costs of £319 (95% CI, −£1558 to £2496), and AV-EXT in lower costs of £1965 (95% CI, −£1912 to £1519), compared with TAU. Over the follow-up, AV-BRF resulted in 0.0159 (95% CI, −0.0103 to 0.0422) and AV-EXT in 0.0173 (95% CI, −0.0049 to 0.0395) more QALYs than TAU. The cost per QALY for AV-BRF compared with TAU was £20 016, while AV-EXT dominated TAU (lower costs and more QALYs).
Conclusions
Neither version of AVATAR had a substantial impact on QALYs. However, AV-EXT did result in reduced care costs − albeit not statistically significant − and was potentially cost-effective compared with TAU. AV-BRF had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio that indicated lower potential cost-effectiveness. These findings are uncertain, but could still inform decision-making regarding interventions in this field.
Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are prevalent in dementia and can include depression, anxiety, agitation, aggression, disinhibition, apathy, psychosis, compulsions, eating disorders, and sleep disturbances. These symptoms can occur at different stages of the disease and vary in frequency and severity between different types of dementia. The underlying pathology of each disease can affect different brain structures, leading to overlapping symptoms and syndromes. Treatment options for NPS are limited and often based on trial and error. Nonpharmacological interventions, such as cognitive behavioral therapy and lifestyle modifications, can be effective in some cases. Pharmacological interventions, including antidepressants, antipsychotics, and stimulants, may also be used, but their efficacy is variable, and they can have side effects. Further research is needed to better understand the underlying mechanisms of NPS in dementia and to develop more effective treatment strategies.
Treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) requires a complex interaction among the patient and care partner, clinician, and health care system. Pharmacotherapy for AD includes aducanumab for patients with mild cognitive impairment mild AD dementia due to AD. Cholinesterase inhibitors are available for mild, moderate, and severe AD dementia and memantine is indicated for patients with moderate and severe AD dementia. Neuropsychiatric symptoms – agitation, psychosis, depression, apathy, insomnia – are common in AD and can be managed with psychotropic agents. Most use of psychotropics is off label and based on the phenotypic similarity between the symptoms occurring in AD and those occurring in disorders with approved indications. The first disease modifying agents for AD are moving toward clinical use in prodromal AD/mild AD dementia. These agents will make new demands on clinicians, health care systems, and patients and their care partners. Pharmacotherapy of AD is combined with recommendations for a brain-healthy lifestyle and care of the care partner.
Clinical progression during psychosis has been closely associated with grey matter abnormalities resulting from atypical brain development. However, the complex interplay between psychopathology and heterogeneous maturational trajectories challenges the identification of neuroanatomical features that anticipate symptomatic decline.
Aims
To investigate cortical volume longitudinal deviations in first-episode psychosis (FEP) using normative modelling, exploring their relationship with long-term cognitive and symptomatic outcomes, as well as their cytoarchitectural and neurobiological underpinnings.
Method
We collected magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cognitive and symptomatic data from 195 healthy controls and 357 drug-naïve or minimally medicated FEP individuals that were followed up 1, 3, 5 and 10 years following the first episode (1209 MRI scans and assessments in total). Using normative modelling, we derived subject-specific centile scores for cortical volume to investigate atypical deviations in FEP and their relationship to long-term cognitive and symptomatic deterioration. The resulting centile association maps were further characterised by examining their cytoarchitectural and neurobiological attributes using normative atlases.
Results
FEP centiles demonstrated a widespread reduction at treatment initiation, with longitudinal analysis showing an increase during treatment time, indicating convergence towards normal maturation trajectories. Interestingly, this effect was reduced in highly medicated individuals. Additionally, we found that cognitive impairments experienced during early FEP stages worsened under long-term medication. Positive symptomatology was negatively associated with regional centiles, and individuals with higher centiles benefited most from treatment. Cytoarchitectural and neurobiological analyses revealed that regional centiles related to FEP, as well as to symptomatology, were associated with specific molecular features, such as regional serotonin and dopamine receptor densities.
Conclusions
Collectively, these findings underscore the potential use of centile-based normative modelling for a better understanding of how atypical cortical development contributes to the long-term clinical progression of neurodevelopmental conditions.
According to existing evidence, during menopause transition, women with psychosis may present with exacerbated psychiatric symptoms, due to age-related hormonal changes.
Aims
We aimed to (a) replicate this evidence, using age as a proxy for peri/menopausal status; (b) investigate how clinical presentation is affected by concomitant factors, including hyperprolactinaemia, dose and metabolism of prescribed antipsychotics using cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.
Method
Secondary analysis on 174 women aged 18–65, from the IMPaCT (Improving physical health and reducing substance use in psychosis) randomised controlled trial. We compared women aged below (N = 65) and above 40 (N = 109) for (a) mental health status with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale; (b) current medications and (c) prolactin levels, at baseline and at follow-up (12/15 months later).
Results
Women aged above 40 showed higher baseline PANSS total score (mean ± s.d. = 53.4 ± 14.1 v. 48.0 ± 13.0, p = 0.01) and general symptoms scores (28.0 ± 7.4 v. 25.7 ± 7.8, p = 0.03) than their younger counterparts. Progressive sub-analysis revealed that this age-related difference was observed only in women with non-affective psychosis (n = 93) (PANSS total score: 57.1 ± 13.6 v. 47.0 ± 14.4, p < 0.005) and in those prescribed antipsychotic monotherapy with olanzapine or clozapine (n = 25) (PANSS total score: 63 ± 16.4 v. 42.8 ± 10.9, p < 0.05).
Among all women with hyperprolactinaemia, those aged above 40 also had higher PANSS positive scores than their younger counterparts. No longitudinal differences were found between age groups.
Conclusions
Women aged above 40 showed worse psychotic symptoms than younger women. This difference seems diagnosis-specific and may be influenced by antipsychotics metabolism. Further longitudinal data are needed considering the menopause transition.
Insight into psychosis is a multidimensional construct involving awareness of illness, attribution of symptoms, and perceived need for treatment. Despite extensive research, substantial variability in how insight is conceptualized and measured continues to hinder clinical assessment and cross-study comparisons.
Methods
Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines and a registered International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews protocol (CRD42024558386), we conducted a systematic search across five databases (n = 2,184). Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 15 primary scale development papers and 10 independent validation studies. We included instruments explicitly designed to assess insight in schizophrenia-spectrum, and evaluated them using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments Risk of Bias checklist. Psychometric domains assessed included content validity, structural validity, construct validity, criterion validity, internal consistency, reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability.
Results
Fifteen distinct insight scales were identified, comprising nine clinician-rated instruments, five self-report tools, and one hybrid format. Most demonstrated adequate content and structural validity, with 11 achieving ‘very good’ reliability ratings. Four scales showed the strongest overall psychometric support. However, responsiveness to clinical change was rarely tested, and cross-cultural validation remained limited. Earlier instruments primarily emphasized clinician-rated illness awareness, whereas more recent tools incorporated cognitive, neurocognitive, and subjective dimensions. Discrepancies between self-report and clinician ratings were common and often clinically meaningful. These findings underscore the need for multidimensional, psychometrically robust, and context-sensitive tools to advance both clinical assessment and research on insight in psychotic disorders.
Epilepsy affects ~50 million people worldwide and is associated with increased psychiatric comorbidities, including depression, anxiety, psychosis and suicidality. Despite this, current epilepsy management primarily focusses on seizure control, potentially overlooking mental health concerns. This article explores the challenges of integrating psychiatric care into epilepsy treatment and proposes solutions for a more holistic approach. Using a consensus development panel method, a multidisciplinary team of neurologists, psychiatrists and a lived-experience expert identified key challenges to optimising the mental health of people living with epilepsy, such as healthcare system fragmentation, underdiagnosis of mental health conditions and inadequate resources. Among the proposed solutions, the need for routine mental health screening, interdisciplinary support and collaboration, and increased research into the neuropsychiatric aspects of epilepsy were highlighted. A shift from a seizure-centric model to a patient-centred approach is advocated, emphasising biopsychosocial care and improved access to psychiatric services. We also discuss prospective practical strategies to tackle the issues identified, including collaborative care models, structured decision trees and AI-driven screening tools, to enhance diagnosis and treatment. Addressing these challenges through systemic change, research investment and service innovation should significantly improve the care and quality of life for individuals with an epilepsy and co-occurring mental health disorders.
The nosology of mania has long been a conundrum. Prior studies have alternately concluded that it is an internalizing disorder, a thought disorder, or a unique condition. Unfortunately, nearly all existing studies assessed symptoms cross-sectionally. This is problematic for syndromes that follow a more episodic course, such as mania. Here, we test whether including a history of episodes, not simply current symptoms, can help resolve the placement of mania in the meta-structure of psychopathology.
Methods
First-admission patients with psychosis from the Suffolk County Mental Health Project (N = 337) were followed across 20 years. Internalizing, thought disorder, and mania symptoms were assessed at year 20, whereas corresponding episodes (i.e. depressive, psychotic, and manic) were assessed across three intervals spanning the previous 20 years. We tested five models to determine whether mania (current and past) loaded onto the internalizing factor, the thought disorder factor, or an independent factor. A final model was validated against established markers of bipolar disorder.
Results
For depression and psychosis, current and past markers were congruent in loading onto internalizing and thought disorder factors, respectively. However, current and past markers of mania diverged: current mania was most strongly related to the thought disorder dimension, whereas past mania formed an independent factor. Classic correlates of mania – including family history, genetic risk, and neuropsychological function – were associated only with the history of mania dimension.
Conclusions
Including illness course in structural models of psychopathology suggests that mania is distinguished from internalizing and thought disorder factors, whereas assessments of current symptoms place it with psychosis. These findings require independent validation, but if replicated, they would support a separate spectrum of mania defined by the occurrence of episodes across the lifetime.
Adolescence is a critical period for brain maturation, influenced by stress and hormonal changes. Chronic stress can lead to increased allostatic load (AL), a cumulative measure of multisystem dysregulation, and insulin resistance (IR), both of which are linked to mental health disorders. We hypothesized that heightened AL and IR during adolescence (age 17) would predict the emergence of mood and psychotic symptoms in young adults.
Methods
This study used data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, a population cohort from Bristol, United Kingdom.
Results
Our results showed that elevated AL at age 17 was significantly associated with the development of mood disorder symptoms (MDS) and psychotic disorder symptoms (PDS) and the co-occurrence of mood and psychotic disorder symptoms (MPDS) at age 24 (p < 0.001). Mean AL increased progressively across these symptom groups, indicating a dose–response relationship between physiological dysregulation and mental health burden (MDS = 3.67, PDS = 3.89, and MPDS = 4.03). We also observed that IR was significantly elevated in the MDS, PDS, and MPDS groups compared to healthy controls (HCs). IR was most prevalent in the PDS group, suggesting a possible association between metabolic dysfunction and psychosis risk.
Conclusion
This study demonstrated that multisystem dysregulation in late adolescence precedes the onset of mood and psychotic symptoms in early adulthood. These results support the use of AL and metabolic markers as early indicators of psychiatric vulnerability and highlight the potential for early intervention targeting systemic dysregulation to prevent the onset of mental health disorders.
Clozapine is the only medication specifically recommended for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but research suggests that it is universally underprescribed, particularly among children and adolescents. This article discusses clinicians’ reluctance to prescribe clozapine for all age groups, and outlines its benefits for treatment-resistant schizophrenia in young people. It summarises guidelines on clozapine therapy for adults, including initiation, monitoring and adverse and side-effects, and describes how they can be applied to a younger population. Psychiatrists who care for younger people have consistently highlighted a wish for more learning opportunities focusing on clozapine, such as the content of this article.
The treatment response for the negative symptoms of schizophrenia is not ideal, and the efficacy of antidepressant treatment remains a matter of considerable controversy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of adjunctive antidepressant treatment for negative symptoms of schizophrenia under strict inclusion criteria.
Methods
A systematic literature search (PubMed/Web of Science) was conducted to identify randomized, double-blind, effect-focused trials comparing adjuvant antidepressants with placebo for the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia from database establishment to April 16, 2025. Negative symptoms were examined as the primary outcome. Data were extracted from published research reports, and the overall effect size was calculated using standardized mean differences (SMD).
Results
A total of 15 articles, involving 655 patients, were included in this review. Mirtazapine (N = 2, n = 48, SMD −1.73, CI −2.60, −0.87) and duloxetine (N = 1, n = 64, SMD −1.19, CI −2.17, −0.21) showed significantly better efficacy for negative symptoms compared to placebo. In direct comparisons between antidepressants, mirtazapine showed significant differences compared to reboxetine, escitalopram, and bupropion, but there were no significant differences between other antidepressants or between antidepressants and placebo. No publication bias for the prevalence of this condition was observed.
Conclusions
These findings suggest that adjunctive use of mirtazapine and duloxetine can effectively improve the negative symptoms of schizophrenia in patients who are stably receiving antipsychotic treatment. Therefore, incorporating antidepressants into future treatment plans for negative symptoms of schizophrenia is a promising strategy that warrants further exploration.
Schizophrenia is a chronic severe mental illness affecting 24-million people globally, associated with a life expectancy 15 years shorter than the general population. Approximately 70% of people with schizophrenia experience auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs), i.e. ‘hearing voices’. Current treatment approaches remain unsuccessful in up to 30% of cases.
Aims
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of non-pharmacological treatments for AVHs in schizophrenia spectrum disorders, assessing emerging treatment effectiveness and identifying research gaps.
Methods
A literature search was performed between 2013-2024 across five databases: PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Medline, and Web of Science. The meta-analysis included 45 studies based on predefined criteria and bias assessment. Effect sizes (Hedge’s g) were calculated using a random effects model with 95% confidence intervals. The study followed PRISMA guidelines and was pre-registered (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024598615).
Results
Our sample included 2,314 patients and fourteen interventions. The overall mean effect size was -0.298 (95% CI, [-0.470, -0.126]), representing a medium, statistically significant effect. Subgroup analyses revealed medium, statistically significant effects for both AVATAR therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). Conversely, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) showed small, non-significant effects.
Conclusions
AVATAR therapy has the strongest evidence for treating AVHs, highlighting the need for large-scale RCTs and integration into treatment guidelines. CBT requires methodological standardisation. Acceptance and commitment therapy shows promise but needs further high-quality RCTs. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques require additional trials before clinical implementation.
CBT for psychosis is an established and evolving psychological therapy. Historical controversies about the nature of psychosis persist, and more recent debates about the outcome literature lack precision, muddying the waters further. Based on our experience as clinicians, teachers and supervisors, and following NHS and national lead roles, we describe ten common misconceptions about CBT for psychosis. These include misconceptions about the evidence, the focus of therapy, ‘thinking positively’, and the nature of collaboration and the therapeutic relationship. We refute these misconceptions based on current theory, research, and best practice guidelines. We highlight the need to get out of the clinic room, measure the impact of therapy on personal recovery and autonomy, and meet training and governance requirements. It is essential that clinicians, service leads, and our professional bodies uphold core standards of care if people with psychosis are to have access to high quality CBT of the standard we would be happy to see offered to our own family and friends.
Key learning aims
(1) To recognise common misconceptions about CBT for psychosis.
(2) To counter these misconceptions theoretically and empirically – to inform ourselves, colleagues and service leads committed to ensuring high quality CBT for psychosis.
(3) To highlight statutory and professional body responsibilities to ensure parity of esteem for people with psychosis, who deserve high quality, ‘full dose’ treatments delivered by appropriately trained clinicians, and supported by robust governance systems, just as we would expect for people with physical health conditions.
Insight assessment in psychosis remains challenging in practice-oriented research.
Aims
To develop and validate a proxy measure for insight based on information from electronic health records (EHR). For that purpose, we used data on the Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD) and data from EHR notes of patients in an early psychosis intervention programme (Programa de Atención a Fases Iniciales de Psicosis, Santander, Spain).
Method
Junior and senior clinicians examined 134 clinical notes from 106 patients to explore criterion and content validity between SUMD and a clinician-rated proxy measure, using three SUMD items.
Results
In terms of criterion validity, SUMD scores correlated with the proxy (r = 0.61, P < 0.001), even after adjusting for the following confounders: type of psychotic disorder, clinical remission status and rater experience (r = 0.58, P < 0.001); and the proxy predicted good insight status (odds ratio 20.95, 95% CI 7.32–59.91, P < 0.001). Regarding content validity, the three main SUMD subscores correlated with the proxy (r = 0.55–0.60, P < 0.005). There were no significant differences in age, gender or other clinical variables, i.e. discriminant validity, and the proxy significantly correlated with validated psychometric instruments, i.e. external validity. Intraclass correlation coefficient (i.e. interrater reliability) was 0.88 (95% CI 0.59–1.00, P < 0.05).
Conclusions
This SUMD-based proxy measure was shown to have good to excellent validity and reliability, which may offer a reliable and efficient alternative for assessing insight in real-world clinical practice, EHR-based research and management. Future studies should explore its applicability across different healthcare contexts and its potential for automation, using natural language-processing techniques.
The functional outcome of patients with psychotic disturbances is associated with several overlapping premorbid, societal, neuropsychological, and clinical factors. Extracting the factors associated with functional outcomes is important for designing effective mental health interventions.
Methods
In a naturalistic prospective European multicentre study, we analysed the effects of sociodemographic, preadmission, admission, and postadmission precursors on functional outcomes in 296 patients with recent-onset psychosis (ROP) and 262 patients at clinically high risk of psychosis (CHR-P). Functioning was assessed with the Global Assessment of Functioning—symptoms and deficits version—at baseline and at the 9- and 18-month follow-ups.
Results
In the overall sample, male sex, childhood adversities, poor sociability, scholastic problems, neurocognitive deficits, and greater severity of baseline and follow-up symptoms were associated with poor functional outcomes. In contrast, a favourable work/educational situation and preadmission treatment for nonpsychotic disorders were associated with better functional outcomes. Among ROP patients, neurocognitive deficits and the severity of baseline and follow-up affective and psychotic symptoms were strongly associated with functional outcomes. Among CHR-P patients, premorbid sociability, previous treatment for affective disorders, and follow-up affective symptoms played more significant roles.
Conclusions
To improve functioning in patients in the early stages of psychosis, several factors should be considered, such as sex, childhood adversities, psychosocial development, baseline neurocognitive deficits, work/educational situation, clinical presentations, and follow-up symptoms. Personalized and integrated treatment and rehabilitation measures should be actively continued beyond the first admission period, with a particular focus on addressing both baseline and follow-up affective disturbances.
Chapter 10 demonstrates how corpus approaches support the study of various social actors. We include two case studies. The first study investigates how representations of people with obesity in the UK press contribute to stigmatisation. The analysis orients around the naming strategies to collectively and individually refer to people with obesity, as well as the adjectives used to describe them and the activities that they are reported to be involved in. Furthermore, we show that people with obesity are regularly held up as figures of ridicule and obesity is discussed in the context of social deviance, foregrounded when reporting on perpetrators of crimes. The second study uses a tailor-made annotation system to discuss referential strategies, descriptions of traits and the capacity to carry out different kinds of actions in the context of voice-hearing, to critically consider the different degrees to which people who experience psychosis personify their voices. We track these representations in the reports of those with lived experience over time and consider the implications of a social actor model for therapeutic interventions to support those with chronic mental health issues.
Clozapine is the gold standard for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. In the setting of malignancy with concurrent anti-cancer agent use, clozapine use may be of increased concern. Clozapine cessation holds its own risks. This study aims to systematically review all cases of concurrent pharmacotherapy with clozapine and anti-cancer agents and analyze the psychiatric and physical health outcomes. PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases were searched from inception to February 2025. Descriptive statistics and narrative analysis of the included cases occurred. There were 53 cases of clozapine use with anti-cancer agents, with a male to female ratio of 1.7:1 and a mean age of 45.0 years. In 30 cases, clozapine was continued without interruption, and in additional 16 cases, clozapine was recommenced after a period of interruption. In cases with clozapine interruption or discontinuation, 90% noted significant deterioration in mental state despite alternative antipsychotic treatments. There were 34 cases of neutropenia, mostly (94%) in the setting of cytotoxic chemotherapy, with low rates of neutropenic complications. The successful continuation of clozapine with anti-cancer agents can occur, although risk-benefit analysis taking into account individual, clozapine, psychiatric, and physical health factors is required. Consideration of prophylactic neutropenia protective measures should form part of the discussion with the individual and their family.