We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Following a disaster, a pseudo-epidemic can occur due to redundant and duplicated data caused by infrastructure and information system disruptions. This study aims to investigate whether there have been improvements the post-disaster surveillance system in the comparison of diarrhea incidents between Central Sulawesi, Indonesia, and Cianjur, West Java, Indonesia.
Methods
We conducted an analysis of the epidemic-prone disease diarrhea before and during disasters, comparing the data with secondary data from the Early Warning Alert and Response System (EWARS) and the District Health Information System V.02 (DHIS-2).
Results
In central Sulawesi in 2018 and Cianjur in 2022, we observed an upsurge in diarrhea cases in the first week after the disaster. Although diarrhea cases increased after the disaster, they remained within acceptable outbreak criteria. Multiplication and redundant data were detected in the DHIS-2 system in Central Sulawesi, likely leading to erroneous overreporting. Changes in surveillance officers and their personal experiences during the disaster contributed to data inconsistencies. As compared to Central Sulawesi, the DHIS-2 reporting form in Cianjur was simplified as an individual form to enhance efficiency and accuracy.
Conclusions
Enhancing valid assessment and conducting thorough investigations are essential to improve surveillance protocols for epidemic-prone diseases following disasters.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.