We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Early prehistoric accounts of water cycling in nature refer only to, or hint at, the atmospheric phase of the water cycle. Wherever evaporation is alluded to, it is mostly assumed to take place from rivers and the sea. Speculations on the origin of these streams or on whether or how their water returns to where the streams originated, came later in Greek antiquity. This era produced essentially four competing theories on this, namely the seawater filtration theory, the underground condensation theory, the concept of pre-existing underground primal water, likely based on mythology and less accepted by the philosophers, and the rainfall percolation theory. Although the latter contains the essence of our present understanding, it took nearly another 23 centuries before it became the only remaining one to be fully accepted. In recorded history it can be followed as a thread running through the works of the pre-Socratics, the post-Aristotelian Peripatetics, Vitruvius in ancient Rome, Buridan and other medieval Schoolmen, Bartas, Palissy, and Gassendi in the Renaissance, Mariotte, Ray, and Van Musschenbroek at the dawn of modern science, and finally Dalton in the early nineteenth century.
Immanuel Kant's lectures on anthropology are divided into two parts. After a short, programmatic introduction there follows first an empirical psychology modeled after the third part of Baumgarten's Metaphysica. For the initially untitled second part, there is no textbook precedent. To use a modern turn of phrase, the second part of the lecture could be described on the whole as 'differential psychology'. From the mid-1770s, variously executed but similarly intentioned presentations of this sort came to conclude and climax in an attempt to characterise the human species as a whole. This internal development, which is also reflected in novel terminology, includes Kant's Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. The view of the human being associated with physical theology does, however, offer a striking contrast to the alternative 'determination of man' formulated from the beginning in the lectures on anthropology.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.