As increasing numbers of students disclose mental health conditions, this study is the first to examine mental health status as a critical variable in foreign language anxiety research. Using a mixed-methods approach and drawing on data from 262 languages students at the Open University, it systematically compares foreign language speaking anxiety (FLSA) experiences between students with and without declared mental health conditions. Vocabulary retrieval emerged as the primary anxiety trigger common to all learners, however, significant distinctions emerged: students without mental health conditions expressed more academic-focused anxieties, whereas those with mental health conditions faced confidence and identity-based barriers. Students with mental health challenges are less likely to speak spontaneously and undertake spoken assessments, often opting to avoid online synchronous sessions entirely, requiring different coping strategies. The findings are analysed through a Universal Learning Design lens and reveal the need for tailored support and innovative pedagogical solutions, including AI-powered practice environments and self-compassion interventions specifically designed for online language learning contexts, to address the emotional barriers faced by students with mental health conditions. The study offers broader implications for inclusive (language) course design and learner engagement.

This article explores how online language learners encounter foreign language speaking anxiety (FLSA), what mitigating strategies they apply to manage synchronous online tutorials, and what their asynchronous speaking practices are. In a large-scale mixed methods study, we gathered survey data from 307 language learners at a UK online and distance learning university and conducted in-depth group interviews with 10 students focusing on their FLSA experience and perceptions regarding synchronous and asynchronous speaking activities. The results reveal that the triggers of FLSA and the mitigating strategies learners apply partly overlap with those in the face-to-face context but are partly specific to the online environment (e.g. breakout rooms, vicarious learning). The use of technology can be anxiety-inducing (e.g. cameras) as well as supportive (e.g. online translation tools and dictionaries). Novel findings of the study are that avoidance strategies are more nuanced in this context, ranging from complete avoidance of tutorials to full engagement via the chat, and that the use of breakout rooms magnifies learners’ emotions and is one of the main triggers of FLSA. This might be helpful for practitioners – also beyond language courses – in scaffolding and optimising their small group activities online.