To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This study aimed to assess the prevalence of non-sugar sweeteners (NSS) in Brazilian food products before the implementation of new nutritional labeling legislation. Specifically, we aimed to determine the eligibility of these products to contain NSS according to RDC no. 18/2008, which governed the use of NSS in Brazil during the study period.
Design:
Data were collected from 3335 packaged foods and beverages available in one of Brazil’s top 10 supermarket chains, six months following the publication of front-of-package nutrition labeling (FoPNL) and 19 months before the legislation came into force.
Setting:
The study was conducted in Brazil.
Results:
Our analysis revealed that NSS were present in 12.5% of the sampled products. Notably, high frequencies of NSS were observed in powder dessert mixes and soy drinks (100%), gelatin preparations (88.1%), chewing gum (87.1%), tea (84.6%), and carbonated beverages (71.4%). Furthermore, we found that 82% of products containing NSS made claims regarding sugar and calorie reduction, with 16.6% of these claims being inconspicuous. Additionally, 14% of products targeted controlled sugar intake diets, 0.5% aimed at sugar-restricted diets, and 4% were ineligible for NSS use. Importantly, the declared NSS content adhered to Brazilian regulatory limits.
Conclusions:
While most products complied with regulatory standards, our findings highlight the presence of ineligible products and less prominent claims, which may complicate NSS identification for consumers. Continuous monitoring of NSS prevalence, especially following the implementation of FoPNL, is essential for ensuring compliance with regulations and promoting informed consumer choices in Brazil.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.