We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Recent helioseismic estimates of the deep solar meridional flow have been contradictory. Using two years worth of GONG data, I show here that the detection of the meridional flow is ambiguous below about 0.85 solar radii.
We have derived the latitude motions of sunspots classified into three area categories using the measures of positions and areas of their umbrae from the white – light images of the Sun for the period 1906 – 1987 from the Kodaikanal Observatory archives. The latitude motions are directed equator – ward in all the three area classes. We interpret that these equator – ward latitude motions reflect the meridional flows at the three depths in the convection zone where the magnetic flux loops of the spots of the three area classes are anchored. We obtain estimates of the anchor depths through a comparison of the rotation rates of the spots in each area class with the rotation rate profiles from helioseismic inversions. The equator – ward flows measured by us thus provide evidence of the return meridional flows in the convection zone as required in the flux transport solar dynamo models. We have done an identical analysis using a similar data set derived from the photoheliogram collections of the Mt.Wilson Observatory for the period 1917 – 1985. There is good agreement between the results from the data sets of the two observatories.
Several uncertain helioseismic findings of potential interest to Jüri about the solar convection zone are briefly discussed, along with some personal optimistic hopes for the future.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.