We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Field tracer experiments in Borden aquifer in Canada and the Macrodispersion Experiment (MADE) Site, Mississippi, are reviewed. Both experiments injected tracers in aquifers and monitored their movements over fields at ten to hundred meters under natural gradient conditions. The behaviors of the tracer plumes at these two sites are distinctly different because the Borden aquifer is statistically homogeneous, and the aquifer of MADE is statistically heterogeneous. As a result, the validity of the classical ADE and non-Fickian dual-domain models becomes a contentious debate and deserves articulation of the differences between the ensemble mean nature of the models and the observations in one realization. The two experiments provided opportunities for understanding the limitations of applying solute transport theories and mathematical models based on soil-column experiments to real-world scenarios where heterogeneity is multi-scales, and groundwater flow varies spatiotemporally. Ignorance of the differences in scale of dominant heterogeneity and the observation, model, and interest scales is to blame. We explore and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the theories and models.
Quantifying the multiscale hydraulic heterogeneity in aquifers and their effects on solute transport is the task of this chapter. Using spatial statistics, we explain how to quantify spatial variability of hydraulic properties or parameters in the aquifer using the stochastic or random field concept. In particular, we discuss spatial covariance, variogram, statistical homogeneity, heterogeneity, isotropy, and anisotropy concepts. Field examples complement the discussion. We then present a highly parameterized heterogeneous media (HPHM) approach for simulating flow and solute transport in aquifers with spatially varying hydraulic properties to meet our interest and observation scale. However, our limited ability to collect the needed information for this approach promotes alternatives such as Monte Carlo simulation, zonation, and equivalent homogeneous media (EHM) approaches with macrodispersion approaches. This chapter details the EHM with the macordispersion concept.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.