We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The observational parameter space that allows us to detect and describe nonsingle stars is enormous. It comes from the fact that binary stars are very numerous, present themselves with a huge variety of physical properties and have signatures in all astronomical fundamental techniques (astrometry, photometry, spectroscopy). It is, therefore, not a surprise that any significant improvement in observational astronomical facilities has an important impact on our knowledge of binaries. We are currently in an era where the development of various large-scale surveys is impressive. Among them, Gaia and LSST are exceptional surveys that have and likely will have a profound and long-lasting impact on the astronomical landscape. This chapter reviews the status of these two projects, and considers how they improve our knowledge of binary stars.
Many aspects of the evolution of stars, and in particular the evolution of binary stars, are beyond our ability to model them in detail. Instead, we rely on observations to guide our often phenomenological models and pin down uncertain model parameters. To do this statistically requires population synthesis. Populations of stars modelled on computers are compared to populations of stars observed with our best telescopes. The closest match between observations and models provides insight into unknown model parameters and hence the underlying astrophysics. This chapter reviews the impact that modern big-data surveys will have on population synthesis, the large parameter space problem that is rife for the application of modern data science algorithms and some examples of how population synthesis is relevant to modern astrophysics.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.