We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The Janus faces of IVFIn vitro fertilization therapy was originally pioneered by Edwards, Steptoe and Purdy in order to help women suffering from bilateral tubal occlusion. The subsequent rise of Assisted Reproductive Therapy (ART) as a default treatment for many different forms of human infertility has been successful to the point that it has now become a major industry that exists, not just to meet the needs of its desperate patients, but to satisfy the aspirations of its shareholders. The sheer scale of the demand for ART services in the future may create several issues that will have to be addressed, including the cost of providing equitable access to such therapy and meeting the long-term health needs of the children born as a result. When conducted at scale, the ART industry will also serve to retain poor fertility genes within the population. When combined with the lack of selection pressure on human fertility in advanced affluent societies, this feature will ensure that the incidence of infertility continues to rise, fuelling the need for more ART services in a self-perpetuating spiral. This may be a boon for business but will become a millstone for Governments trying to provide equitable access to healthcare services, including ART.
This chapter examines the process of in vitro maturation (IVM), its efficacy and safety, and explores why it is not more routinely used to treat infertility and what is required to make it a more viable clinical option. The treatment of infertility is based on in vitro fertilization (IVF) as the technology of choice. IVM is an alternative approach for generating mature oocytes that eliminates or significantly reduces the need for hormonal stimulation of the ovary. The benefit of IVM is that the procedure removes the need to administer large multiple doses of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) normally used in conventional IVF treatment to women. Current IVM conditions compromise subsequent embryo development rates following fertilization. It is concluded that IVM, despite the reduced efficiencies of implantation potential and increased early miscarriage, should be viewed as having no risk of an adverse outcome to mother and child compared with conventional IVF.
Many couples whose infertility treatment requires in-vitro fertilization (IVF) also need intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) as a part of the procedure. In many respects ICSI has revolutionized infertility treatment as a whole. Both research data and clinical experience have shown that providing a sperm sample during this crucial stage of IVF/ICSI treatment could increase performance anxiety for both fertile and infertile men. The successful use of assisted reproductive technologies over the past 25 years or more has brought with it procedures that allow couples who cannot conceive using their own gametes the alternative of achieving pregnancy through the use of donated oocytes, donated sperm, and even donated embryos. The psychological evaluation is also intended to rule out gross psychopathology and depression, potential substance abuse, as well as a history of current or past family violence or abuse. Marital stability is also assessed within the context of the consultation.
This chapter reviews the literature on the effects of age on fertility in the perimenopausal woman. The effect of age on female fertility is difficult to assess because of confounding variables such as coital frequency and other biological causes associated with infertility, the use of contraception and the social and economical constraints that limit family size. The most effective assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment for perimenopausal women is oocyte donation. Infertility treatment in the perimenopausal woman raises many ethical questions. All fertility centers should establish guidelines based on the literature and their success rates to appropriately counsel patients about the likelihood of live birth based on age. These guidelines would also allow both the physician and the patient to justify treatment in those cases when the odds of success are low but are not nonexistent.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.