To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Psychomotor disturbance has long been observed in major depressive disorder (MDD) and is thought to be a key indicator of illness course. However, dominant methods of measuring psychomotor disturbance, via self-report and clinician ratings, often lack objectivity and may be less sensitive to subtle psychomotor disturbances. Furthermore, the neural mechanisms of psychomotor disturbance in MDD remain unclear.
Methods
To address these gaps, we measured psychomotor agitation via a force variability paradigm and collected resting fMRI in 47 individuals with current MDD (cMDD) and 93 individuals with remitted MDD (rMDD). We then characterized whether resting-state cortico-cortical and cortico-subcortical connectivity related to force variability and depressive symptoms.
Results
Behaviorally, individuals with cMDD exhibited greater force variability than rMDD individuals (t(138) = 3.01, p = 0.003, Cohen’s d = 0.25). Furthermore, greater force variability was associated with less visuomotor connectivity (r(130) = −0.23, p = 0.009, 95% CI [−0.38, −0.06]). Visuomotor connectivity was significantly reduced in cMDD relative to rMDD (t(130) = −2.77, p = 0.006, Cohen’s d = −0.24) and mediated the group difference in force variability (ACME β = −0.06, 95% CI [−0.16, −0.01], p = 0.04).
Conclusions
Our findings represent a crucial step toward clarifying the pathophysiology of psychomotor agitation in MDD. Specifically, altered visuomotor functional connectivity emerged as a candidate neural mechanism, highlighting a promising direction for future research on dysfunctional visually guided movements in MDD.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.